Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, September 2007, p. 4506-4513, Vol. 75, No. 9
0019-9567/07/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.00487-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Australian Bacterial Pathogenesis Program and Centre for Metals in Biology, School of Molecular and Microbial Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
Received 5 April 2007/ Returned for modification 29 May 2007/ Accepted 15 June 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The innate immune response produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS). ROS, which include a superoxide anion (O2–·), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and a hydroxyl radical (HO·), cause damage to proteins, nucleic acids, and cell membranes (24, 38).
Nitric oxide (NO), produced by inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), is recognized as an important mediator of the innate immune response to infection (10). NO interacts with biomolecules within its immediate environment to form other RNS, such as S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) and nitrosothiols through interactions with glutathione (GSH) and thiols, respectively. RNS possess antimicrobial activity through their interaction with numerous targets within the bacterial cell. NO and S-nitrosothiols can inhibit bacterial DNA replication via the release of zinc from metalloproteins (35). NO also inhibits bacterial respiration (29, 36). By inhibiting ribonucleotide reductase, RNS limit the availability of precursors for synthesis and repair of DNA (21). There is also evidence that Fe-S clusters of some proteins are targets for RNS.
In humans and animal model systems, it has been shown that there are increased levels of iNOS expression and NO production upon microbial infection (12, 28). In the case of otitis media, it is the middle ear epithelium that responds to invading pathogens, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and H. influenzae, by releasing proinflammatory cytokines and other mediators, a process that might facilitate invasion (27, 34, 39). In experiments with ear effusions from patients, it has been shown that middle ear infections result in the induction of expression of iNOS (23) and that the resulting NO production has a role in bacterial killing in this environment. If iNOS was inhibited, there was little NO present, and a decrease in bacterial killing was observed (28). RNS defense mechanisms have been described for the enteric pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. This bacterium possesses a number of enzymes with the ability to metabolize RNS. The flavohemoglobin Hmp, the flavorubredoxin NorV, and the nitrite reductase Nrf all have the ability to reduce NO, and the class III alcohol dehydrogenase (AdhC) has been shown to reduce GSNO (10, 22). In S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, it has been shown that Hmp plays the principle role in defense against NO, and the hmp mutant is avirulent in a mouse model system (1). AdhC from Escherichia coli has been shown to use GSNO as a substrate (22), but AdhC was not essential for virulence in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (1).
Recently, we described a MerR-like regulator in Neisseria gonorrhoeae which we called Neisseria MerR-like Regulator (NmlR). We have established that NmlR regulates its own expression and that of a divergently transcribed gene, adhC (18). The adhC gene encodes a class III alcohol dehydrogenase that, in different systems, is known to possess NADH-GSNO oxidoreductase activity (22). A survey of bacterial genome sequences identified NmlR homologs in numerous bacteria, including several pathogens. NmlR forms a subfamily of the MerR family, which includes a member in H. influenzae, NmlRHI. Here we describe experiments to investigate the regulation of adhC by NmlRHI and the function of AdhC in defense against nitrosative stress. The organization and function of this system were also compared in a collection of encapsulated and NTHi strains.
|
|
|---|
Chromosomal inactivation of adhC and nmlRHI. A 1.3-kb DNA fragment containing nmlRHI and flanking DNA sequences was amplified by PCR from H. influenzae using the following primers: HI0186KOF (5'-ACTCACATTCGCCACATTCA-3') and HI0186KOR (5'-CACGGATTAAGCCTGTTCCT-3'). A 2.0-kb DNA fragment containing adhC and flanking DNA sequences was amplified by PCR from H. influenzae using the following primers: HI0185KOF (5'-CAGTGCCAATACCAATGCAC-3') and HI0185KOR (5'-CGTTTTAATTCGGCAATTTGA-3'). PCR was carried out at 96°C for 10 min, then 30 cycles of 96°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 3 min, followed by a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were purified (using a QIAquick PCR purification kit) and cloned into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega), creating the plasmids pGEM-T::nmlRHI-ko and pGEM-T::adhC-ko. These plasmids were digested with BsaBI and FalI (New England Biolabs), respectively (Fig. 1), and treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase. The kanamycin-resistant gene cassette from pUC4Kan was isolated by digestion with HincII and extracted from a 1% agarose gel by using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (QIAGEN). This cassette has no promoter or terminator and does not effect transcription or create a polar effect. The kanamycin-resistant cassette was phosphorylated and cloned into the digested clones pGEM-T::nmlRHI-ko and pGEM-T::adhC-ko. The orientation of the insert was identified, and plasmids containing the kanamycin resistance open reading frame (ORF) in the same orientation as the genes were selected. The resulting plasmids, pGEM-T::nmlRHI-ko::kan and pGEM-T::adhC-ko::kan, were linearized with NdeI and Sau96I, respectively, before being transformed into H. influenzae Rd KW20. Transformation into H. influenzae was performed as described by Herriott et al. (14). Competent H. influenzae was incubated with linearized DNA at 37°C for 30 min. Mutants were created by double crossover, and recombinant colonies were selected on BHI plates with 20 µg/ml kanamycin.
![]() View larger version (5K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Organization of the nmlRHI and adhC gene cluster of H. influenzae. The DNA sequence for the intergenic spacer region of adhC-estD (HI0185 and HI0184) to nmlRHI (HI0186) is shown. The –10 and –35 promoter elements for PnmlRHI are boxed and annotated –10 nmlRHI and –35 nmlRHI; for PadhC, they are underlined and annotated –10 adhC and – 35 adhC. The dyad symmetry is indicated with arrows. The start of translation is in bold type.
|
A chromosomal preparation from the H. influenzae adhC gene was sheared by repeatedly passing it through a needle (23 gauge by 1.5 inches; Terumo Corp.). The sheared product was transformed into clinical isolates of H. influenzae. Site-specific recombination of adhC::Kanr into the chromosome was confirmed by PCR amplification with HIadhCkOF-F (5'-AAAGGCTTTTTCTCCCCAAG-3') and HIadhCkOF-R (5'-CAAACGTTTCGGGCCTAATA-3').
Reverse transcriptase PCR. RNA was extracted from H. influenzae Rd KW20 and H. influenzae nmlRHI strains by using a QIAGEN RNeasy minikit. RNA was quantified using an A260 reading. RNA was checked for DNA contamination by PCR, and no product was detected. Prior to the reverse transcriptase (RT) reaction, RNA was further treated to remove any residual DNA by using Promega DNase (Promega). The RT reaction was performed using a QIAGEN Omniscript reverse transcriptase kit. Following the RT reaction, a multiplex PCR was performed with primers for the 16S rRNA gene (16SFOR, 5'-AGTCCACGCCCTAAACGATGT-3'; 16SREV, 5'-TACTCCCCAGGCGGTCAAT-3') and primers from estD (E1, 5'-CCCAAGGCTGCTCGGTC-3') to adhC (A1, 5'-TTCAACGCGTCCGTTCCAA-3'). PCR was carried out with New England Biolabs Taq polymerase using an initial 96°C for 10 min followed by 30 cycles of 96°C for 45 s, 54°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 30 s and a final elongation step of 72°C for 10 min.
Growth assays. Growth assays were performed with H. influenzae strains using CDM. Cells were grown overnight in 5 ml of CDM and, prior to the assay, were measured at an optical density of 600 nm (OD600; Hitachi U-3000 spectrophotometer) to standardize the amount of cells inoculated. From the overnight culture, 1 ml was inoculated into 50 ml of CDM in a 250-ml conical flask. Different specific concentrations of stress agent were added to the medium. Cultures were incubated aerobically at 37°C with shaking at 190 rpm. OD600 measurements were taken at different time points for 10 h. The assays were done in triplicate. Assay results were represented as growth curves over this period or, for clarity for the large set of clinical isolates, as percentages of survival at this time point.
GSNO reductase enzyme assays. NADH-dependent GSNO reductase activity was measured as previously described (22). Fresh overnight cultures of H. influenzae were inoculated into 100 ml of CDM in 500-ml conical flasks and grown aerobically at 37°C with shaking at 190 rpm until an OD600 measurement between 0.4 and 0.7 was obtained. The cells were harvested (5,000 x g at 4°C for 10 min) and washed twice with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) before resuspension in 2 ml of phosphate buffer. The suspension was frozen at –80°C, thawed at room temperature, given a brief vortexing, and frozen again at –80°C. This freeze-thaw process was performed four more times before the cells were centrifuged at 13,000 x g at 4°C for 15 min. The final supernatant (cell extract) was used for assays. The total protein concentration of the supernatant was determined spectrophotometrically using the formula protein (mg/ml) = 1.55 x A280–0.76 x A260 (19). GSNO reductase activity was expressed as µmol of NADH oxidized per minute per mg of total protein. The assays were done in triplicate.
PCR-based sequence analysis of clinical isolates of H. influenzae. PCR using primers HIadhCko-scr and HInmlRko-scr was used to generate a DNA fragment covering the adhC-nmlRHI region of 33 clinical isolates of H. influenzae. PCR was carried out using Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs) and the following conditions: 96°C for 10 min and then 30 cycles of 96°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 3 min, followed by a final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were sequenced using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The nucleotide sequences have been submitted to GenBank under accession numbers EF523999 to EF524031.
|
|
|---|
NmlRHI regulates the adhC-estD operon. We have already established that in N. gonorrhoeae, NmlR regulates the expression of the adhC-estD operon (18). Using primers from within the estD and adhC genes of H. influenzae, we first performed RT-PCR. This generated a 560-bp product, which was the expected size if the mRNA derived from adhC and estD was contiguous (Fig. 2A, lane 2). RT-PCR was then performed using RNA extracted from the H. influenzae wild type and the nmlRHI mutant and, using known RNA concentrations for the RT reaction and a multiplex PCR with a 16S rRNA gene as a standard, the yields of the 560-bp adhC-estD RT-PCR products were compared. Figure 2 shows that there was significantly more of the adhC-estD RT-PCR product from H. influenzae (Fig. 2A, lane 2) than from the nmlRHI mutant (Fig. 2A, lane 1). Thus, we concluded that the adhC-estD genes form an operon that requires NmlRHI for maximal expression.
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Regulation of the adhC-estD operon. (A) Analysis of transcription of adhC-estD using RT-PCR. Template RNA from H. influenzae Rd KW20 (lane 2) and H. influenzae nmlRHI (lane 1). RNA size marker (lane 3) and the PCR product using genomic DNA (lane 4). (B) Consensus NmlR binding site. The binding sites as determined by in silico analysis for H. influenzae strains are as follows: Rd KW20 (Hi RdKW20) (GenBank accession number L42023; nucleotide coordinates 200673-200692), R2846 (accession number AADO0000000; coordinates 86235-86258), R2866 (accession number AADP0000000; coordinates 46407-46387), 86-028NP (accession number CP000057; coordinates 261657-261638), Lactobacillus plantarum (Lac.plant) (accession number CR377164; coordinates 2681213-2681231), Enterococcus faecium (En.faec) (accession number AAAK00000000; coordinates 9495-9515), Clostridium acetobutylicum (Cl.aceto) (accession number AE001437.1; coordinates 113616-113636), Oceanobacillus iheyensis (Oc.ihey) (accession number BA000028; coordinates 841653-841673), Streptococcus pneumoniae (Str.pn) (accession number AE008532; coordinates 9226-9245), Streptococcus agalactiae (Str.aga) (accession number AE0014211; coordinates 10838-10861), and Neisseria meningitidis (NMA) (accession number AL162756.2; coordinates 80451-80471), as well as the two proven binding sites by genetic studies for NmlR in N. gonorrhoeae PadhC (Ng PadhC) and PcopA (Ng PcopA) (18). The dyad symmetries are underlined. (C) WebLogo consensus sequence for the binding site for NmlR.
|
H. influenzae Rd KW20 AdhC exhibits NADH-dependent GSNO reductase activity. Class III alcohol dehydrogenases have been shown to catalyze the reduction of GSNO using NADH as an electron donor (22). We tested whether this activity was also associated with AdhC in H. influenzae by determining NADH-GSNO oxidoreductase activity in cell extracts. Figure 3A shows that the rate of GSNO-dependent oxidation of NADH in the nmlRHI mutant was more than 10-fold lower than in wild-type cells. In the adhC mutant strain, most of the GSNO reductase activity was reduced compared to that of both the nmlRHI mutant and the wild type. This indicates that AdhC is responsible for the NADH-dependent GSNO reductase activity in H. influenzae.
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Roles for H. influenzae, H. influenzae adhC, and H. influenzae nmlRHI in GSNO metabolism. (A) S-Nitrosoglutathione reductase activities of H. influenzae strains Rd KW20 wild type (Rd), Rd KW20 adhC (Rd adhC), and Rd KW20 nmlRHI (Rd nmlR). Y-axis error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation of the mean. Each assay experiment was conducted in triplicate and repeated with separated bacterial cultures for both strains. (B) Effect of GSNO on H. influenzae, H. influenzae adhC, and H. influenzae nmlRHI. Wild-type strain Rd KW20 was grown in CDM ( ) as were Rd KW20 adhC (X) and Rd KW20 nmlRHI ( ). Results are shown alongside results for each strain grown in the presence of 0.5 mM GSNO, shown as dotted lines (Rd KW20 [ ] Rd KW20 adhC [] and Rd KW20 nmlRHI [X]. Y-error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation of the mean. Experiments were conducted in triplicate.
|
The genome sequences of NTHi harbor the adhC-nmlRHI system. Initial in silico analysis identified the nmlRHI-adhC system within various strains of H. influenzae, including the NTHi strains R2866, R2846, and 86-028NP. When these strains of H. influenzae were analyzed, their systems showed considerable identity to the system in strain Rd KW20, with some exceptions. In strain 86-028NP, adhC has been annotated as a pseudogene. It contains a mutation that results in a premature stop codon terminating the protein at amino acid 109, suggesting that this strain might not make a functional AdhC. There were also polymorphisms observed in the adhC-nmlRHI intergenic spacer region, including an impaired dyad symmetry and –10 and –35 promoter elements in strain R2866. These differences between the nontypeable genome strains and our previous observation that adhC of N. gonorrhoeae is a pseudogene (31) suggested the possibility that the role in defense against GSNO demonstrated in strain Rd KW20 (as described above) may not be representative of H. influenzae clinical isolates.
Clinical isolates of H. influenzae have a functional adhC gene as part of their GSNO defense mechanisms. A collection of 33 clinical isolates of H. influenzae was used to measure the activity and genetic variation of the adhC-nmlRHI system. A region covering the adhC and nmlRHI genes and intergenic spacer region was sequenced and aligned. The adhC gene of strain 86-028NP has a premature stop codon. No other strain contained this mutation. There were some variations in the operator/promoter region of the different strains. Many strains (NTHi strains 1247, 1207, 1181, 1124, 723, and 667 and capsular strains R539, R540, R543, R546, R1831, R3368, R3230, R874, and RM7004 and the Eagan strain) included a mutation which resulted in an altered –10 element (less optimal, 4/6 consensus, and shortened spacer region) for the PnmlRHI compared to that of the Rd KW20 strain. Strain R2866 had a shortened dyad symmetry, and strain 176 (an NTHi strain) had a mutation which interrupted the dyad symmetry.
Enzyme assays were performed using representative strains of each of the variations, as well as clinical isolates of both NTHi and capsular strains, which were identical to Rd KW20 (strains 981, 447, R541, and R3327). Strain 86-028NP had very low GSNO reductase activity, close to 10-fold less than that of Rd KW20, consistent with the prediction that adhC from 86-028NP is a nonfunctional gene (Fig. 4). Strain R2866 also exhibited very low GSNO reductase activity, presumably as a result of a nonoptimal operator/promoter region (as noted above). Although there was some variation in the activities of GSNO reductase in the other strains tested, the majority of strains had activity levels similar to that of Rd KW20. The exceptions were strain 176, which had twofold higher activity than Rd KW20, and strain 723, which had an activity level that was lower than that of Rd KW20 but higher than those of 86-028NP and R2866.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of GSNO on clinical isolates of H. influenzae. S-Nitrosoglutathione reductase activities of H. influenzae strains are shown with filled bars. Y-error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation of the mean. Each enzyme assay experiment was conducted in triplicate and repeated with separated bacterial cultures for both strains. The sensitivities of clinical isolates of H. influenzae to GSNO are shown with open bars. Separate cultures were grown in CDM and CDM with 0.5 mM GSNO. The growth was followed over 18 h, and the results are presented as the percentages of CFU/ml in 0.5 mM GSNO relative to that of CDM alone. Y-error bars indicate ±1 standard deviation of the mean. Each assay experiment was conducted in triplicate.
|
|
|
|---|
Class III alcohol dehydrogenases have been characterized in a number of bacteria, including Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Paracoccus denitrificans (2, 33). Both of these bacteria are facultative methylotrophs; thus, it is essential that they are able to defend against toxic formaldehyde. In these bacteria, there is clear evidence that the AdhC functions as an NAD+-dependent dehydrogenase that oxidizes hydroxymethylglutathione (formed from the reaction of formaldehyde and GSH). A mutant lacking adhC in R. sphaeroides was highly sensitive to killing by methanol, indicative of an inability to remove formaldehyde. In E. coli, the expression of adhC is controlled by the FrmR transcriptional repressor that has been shown to respond to formaldehyde but not to GSNO (13). Inspection of the genomic organization of the adhC gene cluster in S. enterica serovar Typhimurium suggests a similar pattern of regulation, although no analysis of gene expression has been reported. In the case of R. sphaeroides, the expression of adhC in response to formaldehyde is positively and negatively regulated by two sensor histidine kinase-response regulator two-component systems (15). These data support the conclusion that in enteric bacteria and in facultative methylotrophs, the expression of adhC is associated with defense against aldehyde stress. There were no differences in sensitivity to formaldehyde between the H. influenzae strain Rd KW20 and the adhC strain (data not shown).
A key difference between the adhC system in H. influenzae and that in E. coli appears to be in regulation of their expression. In H. influenzae, there is no FrmR repressor, and the complex sensor histidine kinase-response regulator system that regulates expression of adhI in response to methanol/formaldehyde in R. sphaeroides also appears to be absent. Instead, regulation is via NmlRHI, and the nmlR-adhC gene pair is found in a number of bacteria, including N. gonorrhoeae, for which it was first described (18). In the pathogen Neisseria, NmlR is the sole MerR-like regulator, and there are three regulatory targets, adhC, trxB, and copA (18). In contrast, H. influenzae harbors three MerR-like regulators. Analysis of the binding sites for NmlR homologs from the bacteria which harbor an nmlR-adhC pair has identified a significant degree of identity between the dyad symmetries of these predicted binding sites, and a consensus sequence has been formulated (Fig. 2). Our analysis predicts NmlRHI has only one target within the H. influenzae genome, the divergent adhC gene (Fig. 1). The NmlRHI-AdhC system is distinctive from the previously published NmlR system of N. gonorrhoeae, not only in its regulon but also because, as we have recently reported for N. gonorrhoeae, the adhC is nonfunctional (31). Together with the difference in the genes that NmlR and NmlRHI regulate, these distinctive features may indicate differences in the signal to which these NmlR regulators respond. We have not yet identified the stress signal to which NmlRHI responds. The transcription factor contains two cysteine residues that are conserved in all proteins of the NmlR subfamily, except for those in streptococci (Stroeher et al., submitted). It is tempting to suggest that the activation of NmlRHI may involve oxidation of these cysteine residues, as observed for a number of other transcription factors (30). The trigger for this may be disulfide stress, although this needs to be tested in future experiments. It is also possible, considering the role for GSNO, that the cysteine residues are nitrosalated and that this is acting as the switch to an activator form for NmlRHI.
Analysis of adhC from the genome sequences of nontypeable strains 86-028NP, R2846, and R2866 indicated variations that might result in nonfunctional AdhC (strain 86-028NP) or reduction of adhC expression (strain R2866). This casts doubt on the importance of adhC in GSNO defense as a general mechanism in H. influenzae. Assays of AdhC expression and GSNO defense in a set of 33 clinical isolates confirmed that these genome strains were atypical, with all other strains expressing high levels of AdhC activity that correlated well with GSNO defense. Chromosomal inactivation of adhC from a selection of these clinical strains resulted in a significant loss of GSNO reductase activity.
Our study suggests that the adhC-nmlRHI system may be important for virulence in H. influenzae. NO is recognized as a key component of the innate immune response to bacterial pathogens, particularly the niches inhabited by H. influenzae. Specifically with the ear, nose, and throat, different studies have shown that NO is produced in response to infection and that NO functions in restricting the spread of bacteria from this niche (20). Also, relevant studies have shown the survival of H. influenzae in macrophage lines and adenoid tissues and have identified NO production and the antimicrobial functions of NO in otitis media (8, 20, 23, 25, 27). A study which used H. influenzae to examine bacterial meningitis in rats has shown that NO was important in increasing the blood-brain barrier permeability, although it did not investigate the antimicrobial activity of NO (5). Implicit in these results but not elaborated is that while increasing NO levels have a role in bacterial passage from the blood to the brain, maybe through altering cerebral blood flow or brain edema or other consequences of subarachnoid space inflammation, the bacteria need to be able to defend against the levels of NO being produced. Our studies identify the adhC-nmlRHI system as the major mechanism in H. influenzae for defense against GSNO, a stress which is physiologically relevant in a host environment producing NO, and show that this system is functional in most clinical isolates.
Published ahead of print on 25 June 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»