Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, November 2008, p. 4999-5005, Vol. 76, No. 11
0019-9567/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.00045-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University, Ueda 3-18-8, Morioka, Iwate 020-8550, Japan,1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, 8-1 Kawada-cho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan,2 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki 036-8562, Japan,3 The Corporation for Production and Research of Laboratory Primates, Hachimandai 1-1, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0843, Japan4
Received 13 January 2008/ Returned for modification 26 February 2008/ Accepted 7 August 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
We undertook research to explore, using a PCR walking technique, whether there were additional SAGT genes on plasmid pF5, because many mobile genetic elements carry various SAGT genes (2, 10, 11, 18, 33). As predicted, pF5 carries two novel toxin genes, designated ses and set, in addition to selj and selr. These two new toxins act as superantigens and exhibit emetic activity in primates. In parallel, we found that SElR also exhibits emetic activity in primates. As a result, we propose changing the name of SElR to SER. We also discuss the causative toxin of the Fukuoka case and the emetic activity of staphylococcal toxins designated SEl-type toxins.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
|
PCR walking of pF5. PCR walking of the pF5 selj and selr flanking region was performed using a Genome Walker Universal kit (Clontech Laboratories, Mountain View, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. This method is used to amplify regions of unknown DNA sequences flanking a region of known DNA sequence. The PCR fragments obtained were subcloned to pGEM-Easy (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI) and sequenced with an ABI3100 Avant DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The DNA sequences obtained were assembled by Genetyx-Mac software, version 13 (Genetyx, Tokyo, Japan). Identification of open reading frames (ORFs) was performed with ORF Finder (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html), and the identified ORFs were annotated by a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) search of the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) (http://blast.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/top-j.html). The N-terminal signal peptide sequences of SES and SET were predicted using the online signal peptide prediction software SignalP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP) (17). Multiple alignments and the construction of the phylogenetic tree for SEs and SEls were performed using ClustalW software (28).
Expression of rSES and rSET in a GST fusion system. To construct the recombinant SES (rSES) and rSET expression plasmids, PCR primers including the BamHI and SalI sites were designed to amplify the ses and set gene fragments corresponding to their mature toxin sequences (Table 2). The gene fragments of ses and set were amplified by PCR using Pyrobest DNA polymerase (Takara, Shiga, Japan). After digestion with BamHI and SalI, the PCR products were subcloned into pGEX6P-1 glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion expression vector and designated pKSX (which included ses) and pKTX (which included set), respectively. Nucleotide sequences were verified using an ABI3100 Avant DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Expression, purification of the GST-fused recombinant proteins, and cleavage and removal of the GST tag from rSES and rSET were performed by the methods previously described (19, 22). The resulting rSES and rSET had five additional amino acid residues, GPLGS, at the N termini of the mature forms of SES and SET. Preparation of rSEA and rSElR was as previously described (6, 19).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Primer sequences and predicted sizes of PCR products
|
Analysis of requirement for MHC class II molecules in activation of T cells by toxins. T cells were obtained by the S-2-aminoethylisothiouronium-treated sheep red blood cell rosette method. They were further enriched by removal of CD16–, CD14–, CD19–, and HLA-DR+ cells, using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to those antigens and anti-mouse immunoglobulin-coated magnetic beads (Dynabeads; Dynal, Oslo, Norway) (8, 9). L cells transfected with the DR4 gene (8124 L cells) and control L cells (8400 cells) were prepared as previously described (30). L cells were then treated with mitomycin C, irradiated with an MBR-1404R X-ray generator (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) to block proliferation, and used as accessory cells for T-cell activation by rSES, rSET, and SEA. We then measured interleukin-2 (IL-2) production from stimulated T cells to measure T-cell activation. IL-2 activity in culture supernatants was determined with IL-2-dependent CTLL-2 (9, 30). The assays were performed in triplicate for samples and standards, and the data obtained are presented as units of IL-2 per milliliter. In parallel, we examined the effects of the antibody to HLA-DR on T-cell response (30).
Analysis of TCR Vβ repertoires of SES- or SET-reactive human T cells.
rSES-, rSET-, or anti-CD3-induced T-cell blasts were obtained by stimulating PBMCs with 20 ng of rSES or rSET/ml, or with 5 µg of MAbs to anti-CD3/ml, for 3 days and expanding harvested blasts for 4 days in the presence of 100 U of recombinant human IL-2/ml (Shionogi, Osaka, Japan). The T-cell blasts obtained were stained with MAbs to TCR Vβ elements (IOTest Beta Mark kit; Beckman Coulter, Miami, FL). Samples were analyzed on an EPICS XL cytometer (Beckman Coulter) with FlowJo software, as previously described (22, 26). The Vβ frequencies of the T-cell preparations were expressed as percentages on CD3+ T cells. We determined SE-specific reactive T cells when an increased percentage of a certain Vβ element-positive T cells was observed in all donors. TCR V
expression in rSET- or anti-CD3-induced T-cell blasts was analyzed by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) (22, 23).
Emesis assay. In this study we conducted two types of emesis assays. First, experiments using cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) were conducted at the Tsukuba Primate Research Center of the National Institute of Biomedical Innovation of Japan (Tsukuba City, Ibaragi) under the approval of the Animal Ethics Committee of Iwate University and Tsukuba Primate Research. Monkeys used in the experiments were individually housed in stainless steel cages in rooms kept at 23 to 27°C and 50 to 70% humidity, using a 12-h/12-h light/dark cycle. An emesis assay using a primate model was performed according to Bergdoll's monkey feeding test (3) with a slight modification. rSEA, rSElR, rSES, and rSET were dissolved in 10 ml of sterile distilled water and fed by nasogastric intubation without anesthesia to young (4-year-old) female cynomolgus monkeys at a dose of 100 µg/kg. The monkeys were kept under continuous observation for 5 h after intragastric administration of the toxin. If monkeys did not appear to exhibit emetic reactions during the first 5 h, the monkey cages were checked for the presence of vomited material every morning for 2 weeks. In addition, all monkeys were subjected to routine observation every morning, and their appetites and stools were observed for abnormalities throughout the experimental period.
The emesis assay with house musk shrews was performed by a method described elsewhere (6, 7), under the approval of the Animal Ethics Committee at Iwate University. Healthy adult (1.5- to 14-month-old) house musk shrews (Suncus murinus; Nihon Clea, Tokyo, Japan) were kept at 22 to 25°C in a room lit for 12 h from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Purified rSElR, rSES, or rSET was diluted in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2). Two hundred microliters of rSElR, rSES, or rSET appropriately diluted was injected intraperitoneally into each house musk shrew. The animals were observed for emesis for 3 h after intraperitoneal administration. The number of vomiting episodes, the time of each vomiting episode, the length of time before the first vomiting episode, and behavioral changes were recorded.
RT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from S. aureus cultures using an RNeasy spin column (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Purified total RNA was treated with DNase I (Roche Diagnostics K.K., Basel, Switzerland) to degrade contaminating genomic DNA. cDNA was synthesized with SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, NY) and random primer (Gibco BRL). As a control for genomic DNA contamination, total RNA was also subjected to PCR but without the RT step. The ses and set cDNAs were detected with the primer sets shown in Table 2. femA, a cytoplasmic protein gene involved in the biosynthesis of staphylococcal cell walls, was used as the control for RNA isolation and RT-PCR (15).
Preparation of specific antibodies and detection of SES and SET in S. aureus cultures. Anti-rSES and anti-rSET rabbit sera were prepared by immunizing rabbits with purified rSES or rSET, as previously reported (24). Titers of antiserum were monitored by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Specific antibodies were purified from hyperimmune sera using a MAbTrap kit (GE Healthcare UK Ltd., Buckinghamshire, England). Using these specific antibodies, production of SES and SET from S. aureus isolates harboring pF5 was determined. Culture supernatants of these isolates were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA) by the method described by Towbin et al. (29). Reactive signals were detected using a horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G goat antibody (Bio-Rad) and an ECL Plus system (GE Healthcare UK Ltd.) in accordance with the manufacturers instructions.
Nucleotide sequence accession number. The nucleotide sequence of flanking SEl genes in plasmid pF5 was submitted to the GenBank, EMBL, and DDBJ databases and assigned accession number AB330135.
|
|
|---|
|
View larger version (5K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Location of the two new superantigen-like genes in the selj and selr flanking regions. An 11,335-bp nucleotide sequence of the selr (ORF3) and selj (ORF4) flanking region was determined, and two new superantigen-like genes, ses (ORF6) and set (ORF5), were identified.
|
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Phylogenetic tree of SEs and SEls, including SES and SET. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method based on amino acid sequences. Five distinct groups can be observed. SES is most closely related to SElN and belongs to the SEA group, while SET is distinct from the SEA, SEB, and SEI groups.
|
10 but not those bearing Vβ (23). We analyzed the TCR V
specificity of SET-induced activation of human T cells by RT-PCR. Frequencies of T cells bearing all V
elements tested were similar in SET-induced T-cell blasts and anti-CD3-induced T-cell blasts (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (13K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Mitogenic activity of SES and SET. PBMCs were isolated from human blood samples and incubated with a number of concentrations of rSEA, rSES, and rSET. Means and standard errors for triplicate wells from a single experiment are shown.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. MHC class II molecule requirement for T-cell activation by SES and SET
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. TCR Vβ specificities of SES and SET
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Representative dot plots of Vβs for CD3-gated events from PBMCs stimulated with SES (A) and anti-CD3 (B). MAbs against Vβ9, Vβ16, and Vβ17 were labeled with phycoerythrin (PE), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), or PE and FITC, respectively. Numbers indicate the percentage of T cells expressing a particular Vβ element.
|
Emetic activities of rSElR, rSES, and rSET. rSES, rSET, and rSElR were examined for emetic activity using the monkey feeding test, which has been recognized as the gold standard to confirm "enterotoxin" activity of staphylococcal SAGTs. It is possible to think that all SEs, including SEl types, have emetic activity in primates, although their emetic activities are not equal. An observation period of 5 h may be insufficient to detect the weak emetic activity of some of the enterotoxins. Thus, we checked the emetic activity of the three SAGTs and rSEA as a positive control in cynomolgus monkeys for 24 h or more.
The results are summarized in Table 5. rSEA induced emetic reactions in six of seven monkeys at a dose of 100 µg/kg within 1 to 4 h after intragastric administration. Each monkey had from 2 to more than 10 emetic episodes. rSES induced emetic reactions in two of four animals at a dose of 100 µg/kg within 1 to 3 h postadministration, and five to seven emetic episodes per monkey were observed. rSElR induced emetic reactions in two of six monkeys at a dose of 100 µg/kg within 2 to 3 h postadministration, and six to eight emetic episodes per monkey were observed. Due to its clear emetic activity, we propose that SElR be designated SER. rSET did not induce an emetic reaction in four monkeys within 5 h at a dose of 100 µg/kg, but in one of the four monkeys, we found vomitus several times on monkey cage floor either within 24 h or during subsequent days. In another monkey, vomitus was observed on the 5th and 12th days postadministration. The delayed emetic reactions seen in SET administration were not observed for administrations of SEA, SER and SES.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Emetic response of Macaca fascicularis to SER, SES, and SET
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 6. Emetic response of Suncus murinus to SER, SES, and SET
|
Production of SES and SET in S. aureus strains isolated in the Fukuoka outbreak. In order to check whether SES and SET are produced by the S. aureus strains isolated from the Fukuoka outbreak, we conducted two experiments. First, total RNA isolated from Fukuoka 5 was subjected to RT-PCR analysis for ses and set mRNA transcription for a number of time points during bacterial growth. Figure 5A shows the Fukuoka 5 strain growth curve and the results of RT-PCR at each point. ses and set mRNAs were transcribed at all phases of growth of S. aureus Fukuoka 5. Second, Western blot analysis was employed to investigate whether SES and SET proteins were present in the culture supernatants of S. aureus isolates (Fukuoka 5, Fukuoka 6, and Fukuoka 7). The results showed that significant amounts of SES and SET were detected in all culture supernatants from these bacteria (Fig. 5B).
![]() View larger version (31K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Expression of ses and set. (A) Detection of ses and set mRNAs by RT-PCR. S. aureus Fukuoka 5 was cultured at 37°C and collected for RNA isolation at 0 to 7 h after inoculation. The Fukuoka 5 growth curve was graphed by determining the optical density at 600 nm (O.D.600). (B) Detection of SES and SET in culture supernatants of S. aureus strains harboring plasmid pF5 (Fukuoka 5, Fukuoka 6, and Fukuoka 7) by Western blotting.
|
|
|
|---|
Our study revealed that SER and SES induced emetic reactions in cynomolgus monkeys at a dose of 100 µg/kg in two to six animals and in two to four animals, respectively, within the first 5 h after SES administration (under the standard examination). SEA induced emetic reactions in six or seven animals. Other reports indicate that the 50% effective dose of SEA in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) is 5 µg/animal (3, 4); therefore, it seems likely that SER and SES are weaker in emetic activity than SEA. It is noteworthy that SET induced an atypical emetic reaction in cynomolgus monkeys. Two of four animals examined exhibited emetic reactions only after significant time lapses: at 24 h postadministration in one animal and at 5 days postadministration in another animal. We consider that the mechanisms of the SE-induced emetic responses are fundamentally the same and that the prolonged incubation time for the SET-induced emetic response reflected its weak emetic activity compared with SEA, SER, and SES. However, it seems that further analysis is necessary to obtain a conclusion. As no well-recognized SEs with strong emetic activity, such as SEA to SEE and SEG to SEI, were detected in the causative bacteria from the Fukuoka outbreak, it seems likely that SER, SES, and/or SElJ was the causative toxin of this outbreak. One of these toxins, or any of these three toxins acting additively with one another, would have produced vomiting.
SE/SEl-type toxins exhibit similarities in their amino acid sequences. In most cases, emetic reactions in primates induced by staphylococcal SAGTs with strong emetic activity have been observed within 5 h of toxin ingestion (4). This length of observation time seems insufficient for observing emetic activities caused by staphylococcal SAGTs with low emetic activity. We assume that a longer observation period will reveal emetic activity caused by newly identified SAGTs. As expected, emetic reactions induced by SET were observed after the routine observation period was over. Because many S. aureus strains isolated in food poisoning cases carry multiple genes for the SEl-type toxins, in addition to genes for the classical SEs (5, 21), it seems important to examine the possible emetic activity of SEl-type toxins. We have started to investigate this subject, to illuminate the complete picture of the emetic activity of staphylococcal SAGTs in association with staphylococcal food poisoning.
Our study showed that a major portion of human T cells reactive to SES are TCR Vβ9+ and that TCR Vβ16+ T cells are a minor reactive fraction of these T cells. This TCR Vβ skewing resembles that of SElN, which is phylogenetically related to SES and has been shown to selectively stimulate human T cells harboring TCR Vβ9 (10). Vβ skewing similarity between phylogenetically related SAGTs has been well established (31). The assay system used in the present study to analyze the Vβ repertoire in SAGT-reactive human T cells, however, was not complete. The panel of MAbs used in the present study did not cover all TCR Vβ elements in human T cells. As shown in Table 4, the percentage of Vβ elements in T cells stimulated by SES shown as "other," which were not covered by the anti-Vβ MAbs available, was 44.5%, much higher than the control value (24.1%), suggesting that the assay system failed to detect another SES-reactive fraction. The percentage of "other" Vβ elements reactive to SET was 33.9%, much higher than the control value (Table 4), suggesting the presence of a SET-reactive fraction which was missed the present assay system. Alternatively, SET may have activated T cells in TCR V
-specific manner. Another possibility is that SET may have activated T cells in a polyclonal manner, which is not restricted by particular sets of TCR Vβ and TCR V
specificities. Further analysis is needed to elucidate the nature of the superantigenic activity of SET in detail.
We employed house musk shrews as an experimental animal model to test emetic reactions caused by SAGTs, in addition to the primate model. Although the monkey feeding assay is a valid method to examine human food poisoning by SEs, it seems important to make an attempt to develop a suitable assay system using small animals to investigate emetic reactions induced by staphylococcal SAGTs. In the emesis assay using house musk shrews, intraperitoneal injection of SER or SES induced various levels of emetic reactions. It seems that SEs can induce emetic reactions through two potentially different mechanisms, their enterotoxic activity and their superantigenic activity. At present, we cannot say that this system can replace the system using monkeys to examine SE-induced food poisonings. Recently, Hu et al. showed that intraperitoneal injection of SEA increased 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) release in the small intestine and induced emetic reaction through stimulation of the 5-HT type 3 receptor on vagal afferent neurons in house musk shrews (7). Currently, we cannot define which mechanism, superantigenic activity of SEA or enterotoxigenic activity of SEA per se, triggered the 5-HT release in the small intestine in SEA-injected house musk shrews. Further study is needed to clarify which mechanism is responsible for the emetic reactions induced by injection of staphylococcal SAGTs in house musk shrews.
This work was supported in part by grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (grants 16380205, 18580304, and 18590439).
Published ahead of print on 18 August 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
-specific expansion of T cells. J. Immunol. 170:4148-4154.This article has been cited by other articles:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»