Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, February 2008, p. 759-766, Vol. 76, No. 2
0019-9567/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.01147-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Centre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le paludisme, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso,1 The African Malaria Network Trust, Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology Building, P.O. Box 33207, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,2 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark,3 Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana,4 Department of Parasitology, Biomedical Primate Research Centre, Lange Kleiweg 139, 2288 GJ Rijswijk, The Netherlands,5 Ministry of Health, Ghana, P.O. Box M44, Accra, Ghana,6 Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom7
Received 18 August 2007/ Returned for modification 4 October 2007/ Accepted 26 November 2007
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Merozoite surface protein 3 (MSP3) and glutamate-rich protein (GLURP) are the leading targets of cytophilic antibodies effective in ADCI. Cytophilic antibodies to these molecules were shown to be predominant in protected individuals, while noncytophilic antibodies were predominant in nonprotected individuals (35, 42). These two proteins were shown to have a complementary effect that provides a rationale for combining these two antigens in a hybrid vaccine formulation (42).
MSP1-19 and apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) antibodies have also been shown to be associated with a reduced risk of clinical malaria (5, 12). The antibodies to AMA1 have been reported to have high levels of parasite growth inhibitory activity in a growth inhibition assay (37). Bivalent monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies, as well as their respective monovalent Fab segments, inhibit the invasion of Plasmodium merozoites into erythrocytes. ADCI was not reported as an important effector mechanism for AMA1 and MSP1-19 antibodies, but their biological activity is linked to the specificity/avidity of the Fab portion and, most likely, not to the Fc portion.
Each of these antigens (MSP3, GLURP, MSP1-19, and AMA1) has been included in malaria vaccine candidates which have already undergone phase 1 trials in Europe, the United States, Africa, and Australia, and the protective efficacies of these malaria vaccine antigens will ultimately be tested in phase II or III vaccine trials in Africa. In preparation for evaluating the efficacy of the vaccine in field trials, it is important to investigate the natural immune response to the vaccine antigens and to determine the association between immune responses and protection against clinical malaria.
The present study was designed to (i) characterize the profiles of IgG, IgG subclass, and IgM responses to MSP3, GLURP, MSP1-19, and AMA1 antigens and (ii) examine the relationship between natural antibody isotype responses to these antigens and protection against clinical malaria. This study is part of the work of the Afro-immunoassay network (AIA) which aims to develop standardized immunological assays to contribute to the validation of putative malaria vaccine candidate antigens for development and inclusion in a future malaria vaccine.
|
|
|---|
Study population. The population of Balonghin (approximately 1,600) belongs almost exclusively to the Mossi ethnic group and lives by subsistence farming. All children aged 0.5 to 15 years in June 2003 and resident in the village were listed from the Demographic Surveillance database and invited to participate.
Study design and sample collection.
The study was approved by the Burkina Faso Ministry of Health. Consent was obtained from a parent or guardian of each participating child. A cross-sectional survey was carried out in June, before the beginning of the high malaria transmission season, to obtain a venous blood sample from each child for immunological assays. Samples of 5 ml of blood were taken in a tube containing EDTA as an anticoagulant. Thick and thin blood films were prepared for microscopic examination, and plasma samples were stored at –20°C. The axillary temperature was taken twice, once under each arm, with appropriate quality control procedures. Children with fever, defined as a mean axillary temperature of
37.5°C or a history of fever in the last 48 h were given presumptive malaria treatment (with chloroquine) and an antipyretic (paracetamol).
Active case detection for malaria episodes was conducted during the high malaria transmission season from July to October by a team of study nurses who were resident in the village. Each child was visited daily to take his or her axillary temperature, and if the child had fever, presumptive treatment with chloroquine and paracetamol was given according to the national guidelines that applied at the time of the study. A blood sample was taken, and thick and thin blood films were prepared for measurement of parasitemia by microscopy.
Parasitological diagnosis. Thick and thin blood films were air dried, thin blood films were fixed with methanol, and both were stained with Giemsa 3% solution. One hundred high-power fields (HPF) were examined, and the number of malaria parasites of each species and stage recorded. The number of parasites per microliter of blood was calculated by assuming 20 white blood cells per high-power field and a fixed white cell count of 8,000/µl.
Malaria antigens used for antibody measurement. The following antigens were used to measure the antibodies: AMA1 (25), GLURP (44), MSP1-19 (8), and MSP3 (7). The antigen description is summarized in Table 1.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Description of the antigens used for the measurement of antibodies
|
Measurement of antibody responses. At the baseline survey, children were screened for the presence of hemoglobinopathy, and antibody responses were measured only in children whose blood was of the normal hemoglobin type, AA. Malaria is less common in those with abnormal hemoglobin (3, 4, 15), and the protective effect of abnormal hemoglobin types against malaria morbidity is reported to be due to the impairment of parasite growth inside red blood cells which, in addition, may involve a modulation of immune response leading to a faster acquisition of immunity (2, 28, 34). Since it might be difficult to adjust for these effects in the analysis, children with hemoglobinopathies were excluded.
Specific IgG, IgM, and IgG subclass levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the long synthetic peptide MSP3, recombinant GLURP, recombinant MSP1-19, and recombinant AMA1. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was done by following a standardized methodology described in the AIA standard operating procedures (procedure numbers AIA-007-03, AIA-001-03, and AIA-013-03), as described elsewhere (27, 41). In brief, microtiter plates (Maxisorp F 96 439454; NUNC) were coated with long synthetic peptides LR55 MSP3 (1 µg/ml in phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]), recombinant GLURP (0.5 µg/ml in PBS), and recombinant MSP1-19 (1 µg/ml in PBS), incubated overnight at 4°C, and blocked with 3% dry, nonfat skim milk powder in PBS-Tween 20 for 1 h. Plasma samples diluted 1:200 (IgG and IgM) or 1:25 (IgG subclasses) were added in duplicate and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Plates were washed four times between steps. Plates were developed with either peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-human IgG or IgM (secondary antibody) (H10007 and H15007; Caltag).
For IgG subclasses, the secondary antibody was a mouse anti-human monoclonal IgG subclass (I-9513, clone HP-6002 for IgG1 and IgG2 [Sigma]; M08011, clone ZG4 for IgG3 [Sky Bio], and M11014, clone RJ4 for IgG4) and the revealing was done with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (M3007; Caltag).
Bound secondary antibodies for IgG and IgM and the third antibodies for IgG subclasses were quantified by staining with ready-to-use TMB (3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine) substrate. The optical density was read at 450 nm, with a reference at 620 nm, in a plate reader (Multiskan Ascent, Finland), and the optical density value of the test sample was converted into arbitrary units by means of a standard curve for each plate.
The positive-control plasma samples were from positive Liberian plasma samples, and the negative controls were Danish plasma samples from Statens Serum Institute (Copenhagen, Denmark).
Statistical analysis.
Data were double entered using Epi Info version 6.0 and analyzed using Stata version 9.2 (Statcorp, TX). Children were considered to have a clinical malaria episode if they had an axillary temperature of
37.5°C and parasitemia of
5,000 parasites/µl (30). The clinical malaria incidence rates were calculated as the number of episodes divided by the time at risk. For each antigen, negative binomial regression was used to investigate the association between the levels of antibody measured at baseline and the incidence rate of clinical malaria. The levels of total IgG and IgM and each IgG subclass were analyzed for each antigen in turn. The antibody values were transformed to log base 2 so that the rate ratio (RR) would correspond to a doubling of antibody level. To investigate whether the relationship between malaria incidence and antibody level was nonlinear, a likelihood ratio test was used to compare the fit of the model when antibody level was included as a categorical or a continuous variable. When antibody values were 0, indicating levels below the detection limit, two approaches were used. If fewer than 10% of observations were below the detection limit, the 0 values were assigned a nominal value equal to half the smallest measured value for that variable. If 10% or more of the observations were 0 values, then the variable was treated as categorical, with the first category containing the 0 values and the measured values divided into two groups, above and below the median; a likelihood ratio test was used to determine the P value for the association with that antibody. Age at enrolment was considered to be an important potential confounder and was included in the regressions as a factor with categories defined by quintiles. To model seasonality in malaria incidence, the month of surveillance was included in the models as a factor. To avoid double counting of malaria episodes, any episode occurring within 28 days of a primary episode was ignored, and the 28 days after each episode did not contribute to the total time at risk. To explore the impact of presumptive treatments on the results, a time-dependent variable defined to represent the effect of treatment on the risk of malaria was included in the model. To construct a parsimonious model using all the immunological variables, first, a model was produced for each antigen; in this model, each IgG subclass and total IgG and IgM were candidates for inclusion, provided that, when considered singly, the P value for association with malaria incidence was 0.1 or less. Variables were then removed if the P value for the likelihood ratio test was more than 0.1 and provided that removal did not change the coefficients of variables in the model by more than 10%. Second, the variables in these models were combined in a final model in a similar way. In the secondary analyses, the interactions between the immunological variables and the presence of parasitemia at baseline were examined for their effects on malaria incidence; baseline parasitemia was not considered as a potential confounder in the primary analyses, but its effects were considered in secondary analyses. LOESS smoothing was used to produce plots of antibody level against age using R software. The antibody response associations with age were analyzed by Spearman rank correlation.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Study participant flow chart. Hb, hemoglobin.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Characteristics of the study population
|
![]() View larger version (58K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. (a) IgG and IgM levels at baseline in relation to age. The line shows the LOESS smoothed estimate of the geometric mean. (b) IgG subclass levels at baseline in relation to age. The line shows the LOESS smoothed estimate of the geometric mean.
|
Relationship between levels of total IgG, IgG subclasses, and IgM to MSP3, MSP1-19, GLURP, and AMA1 and subsequent P. falciparum malaria episodes. A total of 116/286 children (41%) had one or more episodes of malaria. Sixty-four children had one episode, 46 had two episodes, 5 had three episodes, and 1 child had four episodes (Fig. 1). In total, there were 175 episodes of clinical malaria, an incidence rate of 2.4 episodes per child per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0 to 2.8) (Table 2).
In crude (unadjusted) analyses, levels of total IgG to MSP3, GLURP, AMA1, and MSP1-19 were associated with reduced risk of malaria; the association was less marked for AMA1 and MSP1-19 than for MSP3 and GLURP. IgMs to MSP3 and GLURP were associated with reduced malaria incidence, the association for MSP1–19 was weak, and there was no evidence of an association for AMA1 (Table 3).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. IRRs for the association between total IgG or IgM level and malaria incidence
|
IgG2 and IgG4, which had large proportions of zero values, were treated as categorical variables, and IgG1 and IgG3 were treated as continuous variables. When these IgG subclasses were considered, none of the subclasses of IgG to MSP3 were significantly associated with malaria incidence; of the subclasses of IgG to GLURP, the association was strongest for IgG3 (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.91; P = 0.004) and IgG4. There was also a significant association for IgG1 to AMA1 (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.97; P = 0.013). When IgM was considered, there was no evidence of an association with malaria incidence for MSP3, MSP1-19, or AMA1, and for GLURP, the association was moderate, with borderline statistical significance (Tables 4 and 5).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Age-adjusted IRRs for the association of cytophilic IgGs (IgG1 and IgG3) with malaria incidence
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Age-adjusted IRRs for the association of noncytophilic IgGs (IgG2 and IgG4) with malaria incidence
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 6. Adjusted RRs for immunological variables independently associated with malaria risk in the final model
|
The incidence of malaria decreased sharply with age; part of this decrease was explained by the immunological variables in the final model (Table 6), but age remained strongly associated with malaria incidence, indicating that, while the immunological variables explained some of the reduction in malaria incidence with increasing age, substantial unexplained variation remained. There was no evidence of interactions with baseline parasitemia for IgG or IgM to AMA1.
|
|
|---|
For MSP3, MSP1-19, and GLURP, the levels of total IgG antibodies increased with increasing age, reflecting cumulative exposure to malaria parasites and, possibly, gradual maturation of the immune system over time. These findings confirm those of earlier studies of blood-stage antigens carried out in areas where malaria is endemic (30, 32, 36). However, for IgM, an association with age was evident for GLURP and MSP1-19, but not for AMA1 and MSP3, showing that the induction of these antibodies might differ according to the nature of the antigen and the level of malaria transmission.
Previous studies using human sera from individual members of populations in areas of malaria endemicity have found evidence of an association between the levels of total IgG to MSP3, MSP1-19, and GLURP and a reduced subsequent risk of clinical malaria (5, 20, 30, 39, 42), although results have not been consistent across all studies (19, 42). For GLURP antigens, the IgG antibodies generated were shown to be associated with a lower risk of clinical malaria in the majority of studies, while for MSP3 and MSP1-19, the situation has remained controversial. Our data show that GLURP-specific IgGs were negatively correlated with P. falciparum clinical malaria, but we found no evidence for associations with MSP1-19 and AMA1. There was a borderline statistically significant association for MSP3; the wide CI for the RR indicates that we cannot exclude the possibility that the level of IgG to this antigen is associated with reduced risk of clinical malaria. Previous studies carried out in the same area found that the presence of a positive antibody response to MSP3 and GLURP long synthetic peptides at the beginning of the malaria high transmission season was associated with a reduced risk of clinical malaria (30). As with IgG, IgM antibodies have previously been shown to recognize and bind directly to trophozoite- or schizont-infected red blood cells (33). Although displaying lower affinity for antigen than IgG isotypes, IgM displays increased avidity because of its pentameric structure. Neutralization and agglutination of merozoites and parasitized red blood cells by antibodies have been shown to be possible protective mechanisms during Plasmodium infection (17). In this study, there was no evidence of an association of IgM to MSP3, MSP1-19, or AMA1 with malaria incidence and only weak evidence for IgM to GLURP. These findings conflict with those of previous reports that have suggested a protective role for IgM antibodies against malaria infection (9, 45) and disease severity (13).
Many studies have shown that MSP3, GLURP, and MSP1-19 contain B-cell epitopes that are targeted by cytophilic IgGs, such as IgG1 and IgG3, and, in conjunction with blood mononuclear cells via their Fc
RII receptors, trigger the release of killing factors, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (11, 35, 36, 43). AMA1 is a target of antibodies that prevent parasites from invading red blood cells in vitro (23, 25). Our data showed that antibody responses to these four antigens are predominantly cytophilic, of the IgG1 and IgG3 subclasses; however, only IgG3 to GLURP and IgG1 to AMA1 were associated with a lower risk of subsequent malaria episodes in this study. These data are consistent with those reported by Dodoo et al. in Ghana, Oeuvray et al. in Senegal, and Soe et al. in east Asia, where cytophilic antibody responses were reported to be associated with a reduced risk of clinical malaria (20, 36, 42). In addition, we found a significant negative association between the levels of noncytophilic IgG4 against GLURP and clinical malaria incidence. These epidemiological results are in contrast with the in vitro observation that noncytophilic antibodies can inhibit the bridging of merozoites to human monocytes by cytophilic antibodies against the same antigenic target and thereby reduce the ability of the latter to control parasite multiplication by the ADCI mechanism (10). Furthermore, it has been shown that noncytophilic IgG4 antibodies against blood-stage antigens (GLURP, MSP1, MSP2, and RESA) are associated with enhanced risk of infection and with a high risk of malaria attack (6). IgG4 responses can develop as a result of repeated exposure, as suggested by Aalberse and colleagues, who showed that prolonged immunization results in an IgG4-dominated antibody response (1). Nevertheless, we cannot exclude the possibility that this isotype may be an indicator of a specific cytokine response responsible for protection. This is consistent with previous findings showing a genetic linkage of parasitemia to chromosome 5q31-q33, which contains genes encoding cytokines involved in isotype switching toward IgG4 and in the proliferation, differentiation, and activation of immune system cells (16, 31, 38).
However, the levels of IgG4 and IgG2 detected were low, suggesting a need for further investigations of noncytophilic antibody specificities and their role in protection against malaria.
Antibodies against MSP1-19 were also predominantly of the IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes, in agreement with the results of previous studies from countries in Africa where malaria is endemic (14, 22). In some studies, scientists have found that high levels of anti-MSP1 IgG1 antibodies are associated with protection against malaria attacks (22), whereas in other studies, the scientists failed to observe such an association (19). In our study, cytophilic isotypes against MSP1-19 were not associated with malaria incidence. In east Asia, Soe et al. reported that MSP1-19 IgG and IgG1 subclass responses were predominant in individuals who did not develop malaria (42).
In our study, children were kept under daily active surveillance and were treated presumptively with chloroquine if they had a fever. This reduces malaria incidence and, hence, the power of the study, but is also a potential source of bias if the frequency of treatment is associated with baseline immune responses. Not all treatments were recorded, which limited our attempts to adjust for these effects. Exposure to malaria is an important potential confounder in immunoepidemiological studies, and inadequate measurement and adjustment for differences in exposure may lead to underestimation of the strength of associations between immunological variables and malaria incidence.
In this paper, we have shown that antibody responses against GLURP (IgG3 and IgG4) and AMA1 (IgG1) were associated with reduced clinical malaria incidence. Currently included in malaria vaccine formulations for clinical trials in humans, these two blood-stage antigens offer good prospects for a vaccine since epidemiological and laboratory data suggest that immune responses targeting these antigens are associated with a reduced risk of clinical malaria in many areas with different malaria endemicities. A series of ongoing studies using the same standardized methods will verify this hypothesis in different epidemiological settings. Nevertheless, the best option to confirm whether these observed associations reflect functional protection from malaria remains efficacy trials of the vaccine candidates based on these antigens.
This investigation received support from AMANET and The Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs (DGIS).
Published ahead of print on 10 December 2007. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2010 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»