Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, May 2008, p. 1889-1896, Vol. 76, No. 5
0019-9567/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.01511-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Institute of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, The Bartholin Building, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark,1 The Institute for Genomic Research, J. Craig Venter Institute, 9712 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, Maryland 208502
Received 14 November 2007/ Returned for modification 8 January 2008/ Accepted 20 February 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The mitis group streptococci, like Streptococcus mitis and Streptococcus oralis, are attractive models for analysis of the intricate relationship between commensals and the host. These organisms are abundant members of the microbiota on all surfaces in the oral cavity and pharynx from birth and throughout life, and they can be easily accessed for sampling (1, 8, 12, 19, 27, 29, 34). Although true commensals, many of the mitis group streptococci are opportunistic pathogens implicated in dental caries (4, 36), in subacute bacterial endocarditis (17, 23), in bacteremia in immunocompromised patients (13, 16, 35, 38), and occasionally in cases of extraoral diseases, such as brain abscesses, meningitis, eye infections, and pneumonia (3, 5, 25, 26, 31). Moreover, S. mitis, in particular, is strikingly closely related to Streptococcus pneumoniae despite distinct differences in its pathogenic potential (M. Kilian, K. Poulsen, T. Blomqvist, L. S. Håvarstein, M. Bek-Thomsen, and U. B. S. Sørensen, submitted for publication). Studies of these streptococci may therefore provide important insight into molecular determinants of the different lifestyles of commensals and pathogens.
Previous cross-sectional and longitudinal studies focusing on the S. mitis population in newborns and infants demonstrated that there are numerous clones assigned to this species in the respiratory tract of each individual. Of the multiple genotypes detected in infants sampled at intervals of weeks to months over a 1-year period, only a few were isolated on more than one occasion (15, 20). Isolates from adults showed the same degree of clonal diversity, but some of the clones colonizing adults were more stably present, although their abundance fluctuated (15, 20). Similar population kinetics was observed for S. oralis in dental plaque (2). Three hypotheses were considered to explain the origin of the multiple new clones that appear to be acquired over time by infants and adults (15). Continuous acquisition over time from close contacts undoubtedly contributes to the process, but the limited sharing of detectable S. mitis genotypes between family members observed in two independent studies suggests that this is not the main factor (14, 20). Frequent emergence of new genotypes in an individual as a result of homologous recombination within the pool of streptococci carried by the individual is an attractive hypothesis for these naturally transformation-competent bacteria, but this hypothesis is not supported by experimental data for S. mitis (15). Rather, the presence of largely different clonal S. mitis populations in different niches in the upper respiratory tract (15, 20) points to transmission between different habitats combined with fluctuations in the abundance of individual clones, the levels of most of which are below the level detectable by the traditional culture technique. In support of this theory a recent study demonstrated that there is intraoral transfer of S. mitis clones in neonates and that the representation of such clones in samples from different habitats varied (20).
Attempts to study populations of S. mitis and S. oralis have been hampered by difficulties in differentiation of these two species. Introduction of the species Streptococcus infantis (18) and Streptococcus pseudopneumoniae (3) further emphasized the problems of differentiation based on traditional phenotypic tests and 16S rRNA sequences, and recent results reported by us demonstrated that neither phenotypic characteristics nor analysis of 16S rRNA sequences allows differentiation of these species (16; Kilian et al., submitted). With this background, it is fair to conclude that previous studies of S. mitis populations may have encompassed several of these mitis group species, which may have affected conclusions concerning the degree of diversity of populations of S. mitis and S. oralis carried by single individuals. We recently demonstrated that S. mitis, S. oralis, and S. infantis indeed do constitute distinct populations of bacteria, although the populations are less coherent than traditionally expected for bacterial species (Kilian et al., submitted). Unambiguous differentiation of these species and, more surprisingly, of the majority of individual clones of these species is feasible based on the sequence of the glucose dehydrogenase gene (gdh) (Kilian et al., submitted).
In the present study we reinvestigated the clonal diversity and dynamics of S. mitis in potential habitats in the oral cavity and pharynx by using a culture-independent method previously used to explore microbial diversity in complex habitats, such as soil (24), the bovine rumen (37), the oral cavity (1), and other environmental and human habitats. In addition to S. mitis, this study included S. oralis and S. infantis and was based on cloning and sequencing of close to 10,000 PCR amplicons of the housekeeping gene gdh amplified from pooled samples collected from two adults on two occasions separated by 2 years.
|
|
|---|
DNA extraction and PCR amplification. Bacteria in the samples were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 300 µl of a lysozyme solution (0.05 M Tris-HCl [pH 8], 20% sucrose, 1 mg/ml lysozyme, 100 U/ml mutanolysin). After incubation at 37°C for 1 h, 250 µl of lysis buffer (10% Sarkosyl, 0.5 M EDTA, MilliQ H2O) and 100 µl of a 10-mg/ml proteinase K solution were added. After incubation at 55°C for 2 h, an additional 100 µl of the 10-mg/ml proteinase K solution was added, and the preparation was incubated at 37°C overnight. DNA was extracted with phenol-chloroform (1:1) and precipitated with ethanol (96%). The quality and amount of DNA were determined by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. An approximately 650-bp internal fragment of the glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (gdh) was amplified with primers 5'-ATG GAC AAA CCA GCN AGY TT-3' (forward primer) and 5'-GCT TGA GGT CCC ATR CTN CC-3' (reverse primer). Previous use of this primer set with a comprehensive collection of mitis, anginosus, salivarius, and mutans group streptococci revealed that it amplifies the gdh target sequence in all strains of S. oralis, S. mitis, S. infantis, S. pneumoniae, and S. pseudopneumoniae and in some strains of the taxon "Streptococcus mitis biovar 2," which according to recent phylogenetic analyses is a distinct species more closely related to S. oralis than to S. mitis. No other Streptococcus species gave amplicons with this primer set (Kilian et al., submitted). Duplicate PCR amplification reactions were carried out for each sample using 50-µl (total volume) mixtures containing approximately 3 ng of whole-cell DNA as the template, 10 µM of each primer, and Platinum PCR SuperMix (Invitrogen Corporation, California). The amplification conditions comprised 2 min of incubation at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 1 min at 72°C and then a final extension for 7 min at 72°C. Amplification products were visualized by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel supplemented with ethidium bromide.
Genomic libraries and sequencing. Libraries of the gdh amplicons were prepared for each sample using pools of the two independent amplification products. PCR amplification products were ligated into the pCR 4-TOPO cloning vector (Invitrogen) and cloned into Escherichia coli One Shot electrocompetent cells (Invitrogen) by electroporation performed with a Bio-Rad electroporator (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Cloning and transformation reactions were performed as described by the supplier. Transformants were plated onto YET/2 agar (Invitrogen) supplemented with 100 µg/ml ampicillin and incubated overnight at 37°C. From the libraries constructed using baseline samples from subjects A and B, approximately 1,800 and 3,700 colonies, respectively, were picked for sequencing. From the two libraries constructed using the 2-year follow-up samples, approximately 2,500 clones from each subject were sequenced. Plasmid purification and sequencing of the inserts were performed at the J. Craig Venter Science Foundation Joint Technology Center (Rockville, MD).
Sequence analysis. Raw sequences were processed using Lucy, version 1.20p (http://www.tigr.org/software/sequencing.shtml), a program that performs automated sequence quality assessment, confidence reassurance, vector trimming, and vector removal. The initial alignment of amplified sequences from each of the individuals was performed with the Clustal software in MEGA3.1 (21). The sequences were manually edited, and sequences shorter than 400 bp were omitted. Corrected sequences were grouped, and representative sequences were identified with the program FastgroupII available at http://phage.sdsu.edu/research/tools/fastgroup/. Representatives of the identified sequence variants were resequenced in the opposite direction for quality control. Potential chimeric molecules artificially assembled during the PCR were identified by comparing phylogenetic trees based on the 5' end and the 3' end of representative sequences. Phylogenetic associations of identified gdh alleles were determined by including gdh sequences from the type strains of S. mitis (NCTC12261), S. oralis (NCTC11427), S. infantis (GTC849), S. pneumoniae (NCTC7465), and S. pseudopneumoniae (CCUG49455), as well as two reference strains of the taxon known as "S. mitis biovar 2," in the phylogenetic analysis. The analysis was performed with MEGA3.1 by using the Minimum Evolution algorithm and the Kimura two-parameter model (21). The robustness of the clusters obtained was evaluated by bootstrap analysis using 500 resamplings.
Estimation of diversity. Rarefaction curves and richness estimates were calculated with the program EstimateS, version 8.0, available at http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/EstimateS. The sample-based Mao Tau method was used to compute the rarefaction curves. The bias-corrected Chao1 estimator of species richness was calculated after 100 randomizations of sampling without replacement.
Sequence divergence within species. The range of divergence within the targeted gdh sequence in a collection of epidemiologically independent isolates of S. mitis, S. oralis, and S. infantis was determined on the basis of pairwise distances calculated using MEGA3.1. Only isolates that were distinct at other gene loci were included. The gdh sequences included 62 sequences from S. mitis, 47 sequences from S. oralis, and 12 sequences from S. infantis. The origin of these strains has been described previously (16; Kilian et al., submitted).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. Representative gdh nucleotide sequences have been deposited in the GenBank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under accession numbers EU486460 to EU486523 and EU486526 to EU486538.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Distribution of pairwise sequence distances for a fragment of the gdh gene in collections of independent isolates of S. mitis (n = 62), S. oralis (n = 47), and S. infantis (n = 12). By comparison, the range of genetic distances among alleles of housekeeping genes of S. pneumoniae is 0 to 0.012. The lower cutoff distance used to define distinct alleles in this study was 0.01.
|
Sorting of all sequences, after exclusion of assumed chimeras, resulted in identification of a total of 39 gdh alleles. Phylogenetic analysis of these sequences together with reference gdh sequences of the type strains of S. mitis, S. oralis, S. infantis, S. pneumoniae, and S. pseudopneumoniae by the Minimum Evolution algorithm in MEGA3.1 identified three distinct clusters supported by significant bootstrap values, each of which contained one type strain (Fig. 2). The only exception was the mitis cluster, which, in agreement with our previous observations (Kilian et al., submitted), included the S. pneumoniae and S. pseudopneumoniae sequences. We excluded the possibility that sequences in the libraries originated from S. pneumoniae, which is a rare organism in the oral cavity and only occasionally colonizes the pharynx of healthy adults. Furthermore, according to our previous observations, gdh sequences of S. pneumoniae are monophyletic. We previously observed that S. pseudopneumoniae has gdh alleles that cluster with S. mitis alleles (Kilian et al., submitted). As no information on the occurrence of this recently described species is available, we cannot exclude the possibility that some of the clones ascribed to S. mitis may represent S. pseudopneumoniae. None of the gdh sequences amplified from the samples clustered with the sequences from two reference strains of "S. mitis biovar 2."
![]() View larger version (8K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Consensus Minimum Evolution tree showing phylogenetic associations and genetic diversity of gdh alleles amplified from samples from two individuals. Bootstrap values, based on 500 replicates, are shown for the major branches. Alleles from subjects A and B are designated A and B, respectively. The boldface values that follow the allele designations are the numbers of identical sequences in the sequenced samples of the gene libraries.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Numbers of sequences allocated to S. mitis, S. oralis, and S. infantis by cluster analysis and inferred numbers of genotypes detected for each species in two individuals at two observation times separated by 2 years
|
Coverage of alleles represented in gene libraries.
The total number of genotypes present in each of the two individuals was estimated by the nonparametric estimator of total richness Chao1. Based on these calculations, the number of alleles present in subject A was
22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 21 to 31). Thus, the 21 alleles observed (95% CI, 18 to 24) represented 95.5% (95% CI, 77.4 to 85.7%) of the estimated alleles. The estimated total richness in subject B was 18, and 18 alleles (range, 17 to 19 alleles) were observed, indicating that the coverage was 100% (95% CI, 94.7 to 105.9%) (Fig. 3).
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Rarefaction analysis based on the gdh clone libraries generated from samples collected from subjects A and B. The curves reflecting the observed [Mao Tau (obs.)] and estimated [Chao1 (Estim.)] richness values plotted as a function of the number of sampled clones demonstrate that virtually all genotypes were detected.
|
Figure 4 shows the longitudinal aspects deduced from the results of the two observations separated by 2 years. The data showed that 18 of the 39 genotypes present at the baseline observation time were redetected 2 years later (Fig. 4). In subject A, the 11 redetected genotypes included four S. mitis clones, two S. oralis clones, and five S. infantis clones. The seven clones that were stably present in subject B included three S. mitis clones and four S. oralis clones, whereas none of the three initially identified S. infantis clones were redetected after 2 years. Of the 56 clones detected in the two subjects at the time of the second observation, 38 were not detected at the initial sampling time. The abundance of persistent genotypes was observed to fluctuate; some genotypes showed significant fluctuations (e.g., clone A12, which represented 75% of all sequences in the initial sample but only 1% of the sequences in the second sample), while others showed minor variations (Fig. 4).
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Dynamics of clones of S. mitis (black circles and lines), S. oralis (red circles and lines), and S. infantis (green circles and lines) detected on two occasions separated by 2 years in samples from all niches within the oral cavity and pharynx of two adult subjects. Circles connected by a line represent a clone detected on both occasions. Other clones were detected on only one occasion.
|
|
|
|---|
To fulfill the aim of the study, we needed a method with sensitivity and discriminatory power that exceeded the sensitivity and discriminatory power of traditional culture techniques. The PCR-based strategy used has been successfully employed in studies of the biodiversity of complex microbial ecosystems (1, 24, 28, 37). Instead of 16S rRNA sequences, which reveal species diversity, our target marker was the gdh housekeeping gene. Due to the unusual sequence divergence in housekeeping genes of S. mitis, S. oralis, and S. infantis, which exceeds the sequence divergence of corresponding genes in pathogens like S. pneumoniae by a factor 10 (Kilian et al., submitted) (Fig. 1), this method is capable of detecting individual clones of the three commensal species with a high degree of accuracy (Kilian et al., submitted). Sequencing of close to 10,000 clones from the gdh libraries generated from the samples collected from the two subjects on two occasions separated by 2 years ensured detection of clones that constituted minor proportions (<0.1%) of the populations of the three species.
By nature, our method allows comparison of only one gene locus, which theoretically limits its discriminatory power. However, comprehensive phylogenetic analysis of a large collection of isolates supported by polyphasic taxonomic analysis demonstrated that gdh sequences provided unambiguous and reliable information about species affiliation and that sharing of the same allele by more strains is rare (Kilian et al., submitted), as confirmed by the data shown in Fig. 1. In contrast, recent studies demonstrated that no known phenotypic trait can be used to differentiate the species in question (16). As a consequence, previous conclusions concerning the diversity of S. mitis and S. oralis populations (2, 14, 15, 20) conceivably were based on mixtures of species.
Artifacts in the form of chimeric sequences are a potential risk in PCR-based analyses of complex microbiota. In this context it may be important that the streptococci in question are naturally competent for transformation and that the mosaic structures of genes reflect the fact that homologous recombination contributed to their evolution (9, 10, 16, 22, 30). Therefore, our attempt to eliminate artificial chimeric sequences by discarding the sequences showing discordant phylogenetic affiliations at the two ends may, theoretically, have resulted in an underestimate of the natural diversity among the sequences.
S. oralis, S. mitis, and S. infantis are all members of the mitis group, which currently includes 12 recognized species. We have previously demonstrated that the primer set used in this study amplifies the target gdh sequence exclusively in all strains of S. mitis, S. oralis, S. infantis, S. pneumoniae, and S. pseudopneumoniae and in some strains previously assigned to "S. mitis biovar 2" (Kilian et al., submitted). Phylogenetic analysis of gdh sequences revealed distinct clusters of S. oralis and S. infantis. However, S. pneumoniae and S. pseudopneumoniae each constitute single lineages within a distinct cluster of multiple lineages, the remainder of which currently belong to S. mitis (Kilian et al., submitted). These phylogenetic relationships are also reflected in the tree shown in Fig. 2. Although some gdh alleles obtained in the present study were closely related to the reference sequences for S. pneumoniae, we excluded the possibility that they originated from this species based on our previous observation that gdh sequences of S. pneumoniae form a monophyletic subcluster (Kilian et al., submitted). However, we cannot exclude the possibility that some of the gdh sequences represent the recently described organism S. pseudopneumoniae, for which no information on occurrence is available. As indicated by the separate clustering of the two reference strains of "S. mitis biovar 2," none of the sequences amplified from the samples represented this taxon. In agreement with our previous observation based on comprehensive phylogenetic analysis, "S. mitis biovar 2" represents a distinct species that is more closely related to S. oralis than to S. mitis.
At the time of the first sampling, a total of 39 distinct gdh alleles (21 alleles in subject A and 18 alleles in subject B) were detected in the two individuals. According to the total richness estimate, these numbers represent approximately 95.5 and 100% of the total number of distinct alleles in the libraries established for the two subjects. We equated these figures with the number of clones while recognizing that this may have caused a marginal underestimate of the actual number of clones due to potential sharing of gdh alleles by distinct clones (Table 1). Of the 39 clones present at the time of the baseline observation, 18 were redetected at the time of the second observation. Combined with the fact that 38 of 56 clones identified at the second sampling time were not detected at the initial sampling time, these observations suggest that acquisition and loss contribute to the strikingly unstable population dynamics of each of the three species, but we cannot exclude the possibility that some of these clones were present on both occasions but below the detection level. The suggestion that acquisition contributes to this phenomenon is in agreement with the previously observed transfers of S. oralis clones among cohabiting couples (2) and occasional sharing of S. mitis clones by infants and their parents (11, 14).
Possible biases introduced by the PCR-based technique prevent the relative abundance of a genotype from being precisely determined from its proportional representation among amplified sequences. Yet previous studies demonstrated good agreement between the proportions of bacterial species detected by in situ hybridization and the relative proportions in clone libraries (7, 33). On this basis, Fig. 4 clearly demonstrates that the majority of the clones carried by the two individuals studied accounted for minor proportions of the populations of the respective species. It is conceivable that such clones would have been missed by cultivation even if multiple isolates were examined. Furthermore, Fig. 4 shows examples of fluctuations from minor proportions to predominance and vice versa. This finding is in agreement with our hypothesis that part of the apparent acquisition and loss of clones observed in cultivation studies may be explained by such fluctuations (11, 15, 20). Furthermore, our longitudinal data demonstrate that such fluctuations also affect the balance between individual species. While S. oralis was the predominant species among the three species harbored by the two individuals at the baseline sampling time, both subjects exhibited a shift toward predominance of S. mitis 2 years later (Table 1). Due to the fact that this study was based on pooled samples from multiple surfaces in the oral cavity and pharynx, we could not discern if such fluctuations are confined to particular habitats.
In conclusion, this study revealed significant clonal diversity within populations of S. mitis, S. oralis, and S. infantis carried by individuals in the upper respiratory tract. The total number of clones, the demonstration of numerous clones in proportions that are not detectable by traditional culture methods, and the observed significant changes in proportions over time demonstrate that the populations of commensal streptococci in the oral cavity and pharynx are constantly changing due to significant fluctuations in the relative proportions of existing clones and species possibly combined with loss and acquisition from close contacts. One important biological implication of these findings is that, in contrast to individual clones of potential pathogens, like the closely related organism S. pneumoniae, commensal bacteria are not subject to rapid elimination by the adaptive mucosal immune system. Rather, the observed fluctuations in abundance of individual clones of commensal streptococci are due to interactions within the complex microbiota, the nature of which is largely unknown.
Published ahead of print on 3 March 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»