Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, July 2008, p. 2888-2894, Vol. 76, No. 7
0019-9567/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.00232-08
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Department of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands,1 Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), University of Amsterdam, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,2 Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut3
Received 18 February 2008/ Returned for modification 20 March 2008/ Accepted 8 April 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The innate response, the complement system in particular, plays a crucial role in the eradication of invading pathogens. The complement system is important in the initiation of attack against B. burgdorferi. The spirochetes are opsonized and also directly killed by the formation of the lytic pore-forming membrane attack complex (MAC) (3, 23). B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. garinii, and B. afzelii isolates are able to activate complement both by the classical pathway and by the alternative pathway in nonimmune human serum (NHS) in the absence of specific antibodies, but they differ in susceptibility to complement-mediated killing (28). Serum-resistant Borrelia strains are able to evade complement-mediated killing by binding to complement regulators of the alternative complement pathway, i.e., binding factor H and factor H-like protein-1 (FHL-1) to CRASP-1Bb (15), CRASP-2Bb (9), OspE (10), and/or CRASP-3Bb (16) proteins, or by expressing a CD59-like complement inhibitory molecule (24). The split products after complement activation are also important because of chemotaxis and the infiltration of immune cells in the Borrelia-infected tissue. Altogether, there are several reasons for the spirochetes to protect themselves against complement activation. In this study, we show that the tick salivary protein Salp15 plays a role in the protection of serum-sensitive B. garinii strains and intermediately resistant B. burgdorferi strains against direct killing by the complement system.
|
|
|---|
Purification of recombinant I. scapularis and I. ricinus Salp15. For the purification of Iscap Salp15 (GenBank accession number AAK97817), salp15 was cloned in frame in Drosophila melanogaster cells in conjunction with a His tag, a V5 epitope, and a resistance gene for hygromycin as described previously (1). Salp15 Iric-1 (GenBank accession number ABU93613) was purified using Drosophila cells expressing salp15 together with a resistance gene for blastomycin (J. W. Hovius, T. J. Schuijt, K. A. de Groot, J. T. T. H. Roelofs, A. Oei, J. A. Marquart, C. van 't Veer, T. van der Poll, N. Ramamoorthi, E. Fikrig, and A. P. van Dam, submitted for publication). The Schneider Drosophila cells expressing the salp15 gene from I. scapularis or I. ricinus were selected with hygromycin (500 µg ml–1) or blastomycin (25 µg ml–1), respectively, and were grown in large spinner flasks together with penicillin and streptomycin (Invitrogen) for 3 days. The Drosophila cells were subsequently induced with copper sulfate with a final concentration of 500 mM for 4 days and centrifuged at 1,000 x g for 15 min. The supernatant was filtered using a 0.22-µm filter (Millipore). Both Salp15 Iric-1 and Iscap Salp15 were purified from the supernatant by use of the HisTrap Ni2+ column (GE Healthcare) and eluted with 100 mM imidazole. The eluted fractions were filtered through a 0.22-µm filter and concentrated with a 5-kDa concentrator (Vivascience) through centrifugal concentration.
The purity of the purified Salp15 was checked by silver staining (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's recommendations, and the concentration was determined with the Bradford assay.
NHS. Serum samples used were derived from one donor and were checked for the absence of antibodies against B. burgdorferi by Western blot analysis. Heat inactivation of NHS was achieved by incubation of the serum samples at 56°C for 30 min.
Assays for detection of complement-mediated killing of spirochetes and Salp15 protection. Two serum-sensitive B. garinii strains, the A87S and the VSBP strains, and two intermediately resistant B. burgdorferi sensu stricto strains, VS215 and B31, were used (107 spirochetes ml–1). Spirochetes (2.5 x 105) were preincubated with bovine serum albumin (BSA), Salp15 Iric-1, or Iscap Salp15 (80 µg/ml) for 30 min at 33°C. They were then incubated with NHS or heat-inactivated NHS and examined after 1.5 h, 4.5 h, and 24 h. The two parameters of borreliacidal effect that were recorded are immobilization and bleb formation of the spirochetes. Immotile spirochetes were considered dead (28). The percentages of immotile spirochetes for 200 spirochetes per well were assessed. In a separate titration experiment, different Salp15 concentrations, ranging from 5 µg/ml to 160 µg/ml, were also tested in the same way.
To find out if membrane-bound Salp15 protects the spirochetes against antibody-independent complement-mediated killing, the spirochetes were washed twice with BSK-H medium (4,000 x g, 10 min) after incubation with Salp15 Iric-1. After removal of unbound Salp15 by washing, the spirochetes were subjected to 12.5% NHS and examined for borreliacidal effect after 1.5 h, 4.5 h, and 24 h of incubation.
Subculture of B. garinii VSBP after incubation with I. ricinus Salp15. The serum-sensitive B. garinii VSBP strain was preincubated with Salp15 Iric-1 for 60 min at 33°C. Then, spirochetes were exposed to 50% NHS for 24 h. As described above, the surviving spirochetes were subcultured in BSK-H medium for 7 days. This selection process was repeated twice.
Binding of I. ricinus Salp15 to B. garinii VSBP in overlay assay. B. garinii VSBP lysates were obtained from 100-ml cultures that were grown to a density of 1 x 108 spirochetes/ml. Lysates were separated by 12.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and blotted onto an Immobilon-P membrane (Millipore) to have approximately similar amounts of OspC, as determined by Coomassie staining. After the membrane was incubated overnight in blocking buffer (1% BSA, 3% milk in TBS-0.05% Tween), it was incubated with 1 µg/ml purified Salp15 Iric-1 in blocking buffer for 1.5 h at room temperature, washed, and consequently incubated with a 1:5,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated V5 antibody (Invitrogen) in blocking buffer. Blots were developed by enhanced chemiluminescence.
Binding assay of Salp15 Iric-1 to B. garinii VSBP by immunofluorescence. Purified Salp15 Iric-1 was biotinylated by incubating 1 mg/ml Salp15 with 0.25 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-biotin (Pierce) for 45 min at 4°C. Unbound sulfo-NHS-biotin was removed by dialysis against 25 mM lysine in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) overnight and four times against PBS for 15 min at 4°C.
Biotinylated purified Salp15 Iric-1 was incubated with B. garinii VSBP spirochetes for 30 min at 33°C. The spirochetes were washed twice with PBS-1% BSA and were resuspended in PBS-1% BSA, air dried on microscope slides overnight, and fixed in 100% methanol. Slides were incubated with bisbenzimide and streptavidine-Cy3 (Sigma) and examined with a fluorescence microscope (Axioscop 2 mot plus; Carl Zeiss).
Detection of terminal C5b-9 complement complexes. B. garinii strain VSBP was preincubated with either BSA, Iscap Salp15, or Salp15 Iric-1 for 30 min at 33°C. Then, the spirochetes were incubated in BSK-H medium containing 12.5% NHS for 30 min. The spirochetes were washed twice with PBS-1% BSA. They were resuspended in PBS-1% BSA, air dried on microscope slides overnight, and fixed in 100% methanol. Spirochetes were detected by incubation with human serum containing antibodies against B. burgdorferi, and the C5b to C9 (C5b-9; one molecule each of C5b, C6, C7, and C8 and one or more molecules of C9) complement complexes were indicated with monoclonal mouse C5b-9 antibodies (Dako). Slides were washed with PBS-1% BSA and incubated with an anti-human immunoglobulin G-fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled antibody (BioMerieux) and an anti-mouse Cy3 antibody (Jackson). After slides were washed and were mounted with Mowiol, they were visualized by confocal microscopy using a fluorescence microscope (Axioscop 2 mot plus; Carl Zeiss). At least 100 spirochetes were counted, and the experiment was performed two times.
Statistical analysis. The protection of spirochetes against complement-mediated killing by Salp15 Iric-1 or Iscap Salp15 was compared to the protection by the control protein BSA. The chi-square test was used for the analysis of proportions, where absolute numbers of spirochetes were used in cross tabulations. Crude relative risks for surviving different circumstances were estimated as odds ratios (OR) and presented with both 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) and P values. Tests were performed using SPSS 14 software. Calculated P values of <0.05 were considered significant.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Spirochetes are protected against complement-mediated killing in the presence of Salp15 Iric-1 or Iscap Salp15. Serum-sensitive B. garinii strains VSBP (A) and A87S (B) were incubated with 12.5% NHS, while intermediately resistant B. burgdorferi strains VS215 (C) and B31 (D) were incubated with 50% NHS, after they had been preincubated for 30 min with BSA, Iscap Salp15, or Salp15 Iric-1. As a control, spirochetes were also incubated with heat-inactivated NHS. After 1.5 h, 4.5 h, and 24 h of incubation with serum, the percentages of immotile spirochetes were determined. Two hundred spirochetes were counted.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Protective effect of Salp15 Iric-1 or Iscap Salp15 compared to that of BSA
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Protective effect of Salp15 Iric-1 compared to that of Iscap Salp15
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Salp15 Iric-1 binds to the surfaces of B. garinii VSBP spirochetes. Spirochetes were preincubated with biotinylated Salp15 Iric-1 (A) or biotinylated BSA (B). Spirochetes were detected with bisbenzimide (blue) and bound Salp15 or BSA was detected using streptavidin-Cy3 (red). (C) Both Iscap Salp15 and Salp15 Iric-1 bind B. burgdorferi N40 (1) and B. garinii VSBP (2) in the overlay binding assay. The arrow indicates Salp15 bound to OspC. M, molecular mass.
|
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Membrane-bound Salp15 Iric-1 protects B. garinii VSBP against complement-mediated killing. Spirochetes were preincubated with BSA or Salp15 for 60 min. Subsequently, BSA or Salp15 was removed by washing as indicated in Materials and Methods, and spirochetes were exposed to 12.5% NHS. Percentages of immotile spirochetes were determined for samples and for controls in which Salp15 was still present. Standard deviations, based on duplicate countings of two independent experiments, are included. The asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference between the groups (P < 0.0001).
|
C5b-9 deposition is inhibited by Salp15 Iric-1 or Iscap Salp15. To examine the influence of Salp15 against complement-mediated killing, we investigated, by use of an immunofluorescence assay, the differences in deposition of C5b-9 terminal complement complexes between spirochetes that had been incubated with Salp15 Iric-1, Iscap Salp15, or BSA (control) and then exposed to NHS. When B. garinii VSBP was first incubated with Salp15 Iric-1 or Iscap Salp15, significantly fewer (P < 0.0001) C5b-9 complement complexes were found on the membranes of the spirochetes (Fig. 4A to C). Of the spirochetes that had been incubated with BSA and 12.5% NHS, 90% had C5b-9 complement complexes on their membrane, while 52% and 15% of the spirochetes showed C5b-9 deposition after incubation with Iscap Salp15 and Salp15 Iric-1, respectively (Fig. 4D).
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Inhibition of C5b-9 deposition by Salp15. B. garinii VSBP was preincubated with BSA (A), Iscap Salp15 (B), or Salp15 Iric-1 (C) before being subjected to 12.5% NHS. Spirochetes were double labeled with antibodies specific for Borrelia spirochetes (green) and specific for C5b-9 complement complexes (red). (D) Deposition of C5b-9 complexes was strongly inhibited in the presence of Iscap Salp15 and even more by Salp15 Iric-1. Bars indicate standard deviations, based on duplicate countings of two independent experiments. One hundred spirochetes were counted, and the experiment was performed two times. The asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0001) between the BSA- and Salp15 Iric-1-treated groups, the double asterisk shows a significant difference (P < 0.0001) between the BSA- and Iscap Salp15-treated groups, and the triple asterisk indicates a significant difference (P < 0.0001) between the Iscap Salp15- and Salp15 Iric-1-treated groups.
|
|
|
|---|
Serum-resistant strains use CRASPs and Erps to bind plasma proteins factor H and FHL-1, which enables the spirochetes to inactivate the C3 convertase complex (9, 15, 16).
Because serum-sensitive strains do not have their own mechanism to protect themselves against complement-mediated killing, they might benefit from binding proteins from their environment that protect them against this part of the innate immune system, which explains why serum-sensitive B. garinii strains are protected to a great extent in comparison to intermediately resistant B. burgdorferi strains (Fig. 1; Table 1).
During the blood meal of ticks, Salp15 is secreted into the tick salivary glands, and it was shown that Salp15 mRNA levels were 13-fold higher and Salp15 protein levels in the salivary glands were 1.6-fold higher in engorged ticks when they were infected with B. burgdorferi (25). Not only for spirochetes, but also for ticks it is extremely important that the immune system of the host is suppressed. When complement is activated, anaphylatoxins and other proinflammatory mediators are able to trigger degranulation of mast cells and attract phagocytes. Additionally, this may explain why the ticks infected with spirochetes upregulate salp15.
Ticks have a cocktail of salivary proteins which are necessary to take an effective blood meal. It has already been shown that they use Salp15 to inhibit the activation and proliferation of CD4+ T cells by binding to its CD4 receptor (1, 6, 13). In addition, tick salivary proteins have been found to inhibit B cells (8), dendritic cells (4, 11), NK cells (17), neutrophils (20), and macrophages (7). Isac (5, 27) and Salp20 (26) are two salivary proteins that were shown to inhibit the alternative pathway of the complement system. This is the first description of a microorganism binding from the vector a protein that protects the pathogen against the complement system (Fig. 3). Since surface-bound Salp15 was able to protect Borrelia even in the absence of free unbound Salp15, it appeared that the protective effect was not caused by the neutralization of C5b-9 formation, at least not completely. When spirochetes were preincubated with Salp15, they were all found to bind Salp15 Iric-1 (Fig. 2) and Iscap Salp15 on their surfaces. For spirochetes, this protection is crucial for survival, since activation of the complement system also initiates the membrane attack pathway, which results in the MAC consisting of one molecule each of C5b, C6, C7, and C8 and one or more molecules of C9 (Fig. 4). We also demonstrated that Salp15 protects the spirochetes against the formation of the MAC complex. When spirochetes were incubated with Iscap, Salp15 deposition of the terminal C5b-9 complement complexes was reduced by 38% compared to what was seen for spirochetes that were incubated with BSA. The effect of Salp15 Iric-1 was even more evident and reduced deposition of C5b-9 by 75% (Fig. 4D). These findings show that Salp15 gives protection not only against bactericidal antibodies but also against the complement system, a very important part of the innate immune system. These results can also explain why higher spirochetal loads in organs of naive mice were found when the inoculated spirochetes were preincubated with Salp15 (25).
In summary, both I. ricinus Salp15 and Iscap Salp15 are able to give protection against complement-mediated killing when bound on the membranes of Borrelia spirochetes. The spirochetal protecting effect against the complement system is possibly crucial in the initial infection of the vertebrate host. These findings make it even more interesting to target Salp15 for a vaccine, especially for the prevention of transmission of serum-sensitive strains.
Published ahead of print on 21 April 2008. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»