Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, July 2008, p. 3131-3140, Vol. 76, No. 7
0019-9567/08/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.01696-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.


Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia,1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191042
Received 19 December 2007/ Returned for modification 17 February 2008/ Accepted 19 April 2008
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Several pieces of evidence have recently suggested that the competence circuit regulates traits that may be important for aspects of pneumococcal physiology beyond genetic exchange. Microarray profiling revealed that activation of the competence pathway increased the expression of more than 120 genes, or approximately 6% of the bacterial genome (27). Fewer than 30 of these genes were required for transformation (27), suggesting that other phenotypic characteristics may be coregulated with the induction of competence. The competence pathway was recently linked to the virulence of this pathogen. Mutants lacking the ComD receptor were shown to be attenuated in models of both pneumonia and bacteremia (2, 16), while deletion of the ComAB peptide transporter decreased virulence in the bacteremia model but not in a pneumonia model (2, 16). Perturbation of the competence system in the opposite direction by administration of synthetic CSP has also been shown to produce a similar effect, improving survival of mice infected intravenously with S. pneumoniae (24). The competence pathway has been linked to several additional aspects of pneumococcal biology that are likely to be relevant to survival in vivo, including bacterial aggregation and biofilm formation (25, 27, 34).
The impact of the competence system on pneumococcal colonization of the upper respiratory tract, however, has not been well characterized. Because asymptomatic carriage in the upper respiratory tract represents the environment in which S. pneumoniae exists most commonly and from which the bacterium spreads to colonize new hosts, we investigated the effect of the competence pathway on colonization of this site. Our earlier work had demonstrated that deletion of the pneumococcal CiaRH two-component system strongly attenuates such colonization (29). Consistent with other studies of the CiaRH system (7, 8, 10), this ciaRH deletion also increased expression of genes in the competence regulon (29). Repression of competence genes by the CiaRH system involves the activity of the HtrA protease (30), which also contributes to the colonization potential of the organism (29). These observations motivated our further examination of the contribution of the competence system during colonization. Because the ciaRH and htrA mutations that impaired colonization derepressed competence, we sought to evaluate the effects of increased competence signaling as well as decreased competence during colonization.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Pneumococcal strains used in this study
|
comDE double mutant was likewise unable to become competent in the presence of CSP, whereas the comAB deletion mutant was able to be transformed in response to exogenous CSP. Insertion of the Janus cassette downstream of comE did not affect the transformation profile of the bacterium. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. PCR primers used in this study
|
Nasal colonization model. Each bacterial inoculum was prepared by growth to an OD620 of approximately 0.3, washed, and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline. Strains for use in competitive colonization experiments were mixed in a 1:1 ratio. Randomized groups of 10 to 14 newborn Sprague-Dawley rats (Taconic, Germantown, NY) were inoculated intranasally with 2 x 106 to 6 x 106 CFU of each strain. Colonization was monitored by serial washings of the nasopharynx of each animal on days 1, 2, 4, and 7 following inoculation, as previously described (29, 36). The density of bacteria in the recovered fluid was measured by colony counting; selective media were used to distinguish strains in competitive colonization assays. The relative strength of each competitive interaction was estimated by calculating a competitive index, defined as the ratio of CFU/ml of streptomycin-resistant to kanamycin-resistant bacteria recovered in nasal washings on day 7 for two competing strains divided by the ratio in the inoculum. All procedures were performed in accordance with institutional animal care guidelines.
Transformation assays. Pneumococcal strains were inoculated into C+Y medium from colonies scraped off tryptic soy agar plates and grown for 2 h at 37°C before being diluted in fresh medium to achieve an OD620 of approximately 0.01. At target growth densities, aliquots were removed and mixed with P1301 DNA (conferring novobiocin resistance) at a final concentration of 2 µg/ml. Samples were incubated at 30°C for 40 min before the addition of 2 U/ml DNase I (Roche) and then at 37°C for 90 min. Transformation efficiency was calculated as the ratio of the number of colonies counted on serial dilutions plated in the presence of novobiocin to that in the absence of antibiotics. Where appropriate, CSP was added to samples at a final concentration of 1 µg/ml and samples were incubated for 10 min at 30°C before the addition of transforming DNA. Assays for the Trt (transformation resistant to trypsin) phenotype, which indicates competence activation, were performed as previously described (30). In these assays, transformation is measured in the presence of exogenous trypsin, which digests extracellular CSP and prevents induction of competence unless mutational activation of the pathway turns it on downstream of the detection of CSP (15).
RNA isolation and RT. RNA was prepared, using a hot phenol lysis protocol as previously described (29), from in vitro cultures grown in C+Y medium at pH 7.4 to an OD620 of approximately 0.08. Purified RNA samples in 50 µl distilled H2O were digested with 1 U Turbo DNase (Ambion, Austin, TX) for 60 min at 37°C. An additional 1 U of DNase was added to each sample after the first 30 min of the incubation. DNase was inactivated using 6 µl DNase inactivation reagent (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's protocol. RNA aliquots were reverse transcribed by first mixing 2 µl of RNA with 1 µl random nonamers (50 µM; Sigma, Saint Louis, MO), 1 µl of 10 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and 9 µl distilled H2O. The mixtures were heated to 70°C for 10 min and chilled on ice. To each sample was then added 1 µl Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen), 4 µl 5x first-strand synthesis buffer, 1 µl 0.1 M dithiothreitol, and 1 µl RNase Out (Invitrogen). Replicate samples were processed without reverse transcriptase. For reverse transcription (RT), samples were incubated at room temperature for 5 min before being moved to a heat block equilibrated at 42°C. Immediately after transfer, the block setting was adjusted to 50°C for 60 min of incubation with an initial temperature gradient. Samples were finally heated to 70°C for 15 min, followed by digestion with 0.5 µl RNase H for 20 min at 37°C.
Quantitative PCR. cDNA samples were analyzed by quantitative PCR, using primers and probes designed for comE. Transcript levels for comE were normalized to those of rpoA as an internal control. The sequences of the primers and probes used for comE were 5'-AGCTCATTCGTCATTACAATCCTTACG-3', 5'-CAAAATCTAGGGCTGATACCTGGT-3', and 5'-6-carboxyfluorescein-TTTGCGACTCTAACATATAAAT-nonfluorescent quencher-3'. The sequences of the primers and probes used for rpoA were 5'-CAGAAGATGCTTTAGGGCTTTCAG-3', 5'-CATCACTTCAGTTGACTTAGCAATCTCA-3', and 5'-6-carboxyfluorescein-TCAAGATGTTCTGTCAAAATA-nonfluorescent quencher-3'. Dilutions of cDNA samples were mixed with 900 nM of each primer and 45 nM of probe in TaqMan universal PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed using a model 7500 sequence detection system (Applied Biosystems). Serial dilutions of cDNA prepared from pneumococcal cultures stimulated with CSP to activate competence were used to generate standard curves for relative quantitation.
|
|
|---|
The comE(D143Y) mutation was generated again in the wild-type background, using overlap-extension PCR, in order to verify that the observed Trt phenotype arose from this mutation rather than from a change elsewhere in the genome. A comE(D143Y) PCR product was used to replace the counterselectable Janus cassette that had been placed downstream of comE because deletion of comE itself prevents subsequent transformation. Transformants were screened by sequencing to identify a clone in which the comE(D143Y) mutation had been incorporated through recombination within the flanking regions of the PCR product. This strain was designated MSP110 and displayed the predicted Trt phenotype (data not shown). Consistent with competence activation, the comE(D143Y) strain developed a high level of spontaneous competence during growth in vitro (Fig. 1A). In contrast, its wild-type parent strain became competent only in response to exogenous CSP. Both strains became refractory to stimulation with CSP at high densities. These data support the conclusion that the comE(D143Y) mutation causes a response similar to that triggered by exposure to CSP.
![]() View larger version (11K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Transformation efficiencies of wild-type S. pneumoniae strain P1534 and comE(D143Y) strain MSP110 (A) or ciaRH strain JKP109 (B) in the presence and absence of exogenous CSP-1. No transformed bacteria were detected for the samples marked with asterisks; symbols for these data points represent the limit of detection of the assay, which decreases as the total number of bacteria in the sample rises.
|
In the competitive model, the
comE strain steadily outcompeted an isogenic streptomycin-resistant (Smr) wild-type strain (Fig. 2A). A kanamycin-resistant control strain with the Janus cassette downstream of comE (Kmr comE+) did not show a competitive effect of the same magnitude (Fig. 2G). The latter competition, between the Kmr comE+ strain and the Smr wild-type strain, is hereafter referred to as the reference competition and served as a baseline for evaluation of the specific fitness effects associated with mutations in the competence pathway. Comparisons between strains were made on the basis of the log competitive index (Fig. 3A), where a value of zero would indicate no difference between a pair of strains. The log competitive index of –0.87 for the reference competition was significantly less than the neutral value of 0 (P < 0.0001; Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and indicates a small advantage for the Kmr comE+ strain over the Smr wild type during colonization. This may reflect a fitness cost associated with the rpsL mutation conferring streptomycin resistance, as documented for other bacteria (3). The log competitive index of –2.15 seen with the
comE strain was significantly lower than that of the reference competition (P < 0.001) and indicates a fitness advantage attributable to deletion of comE.
![]() View larger version (14K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Competitive colonization assays of wild-type S. pneumoniae strain P1534 (Smr) versus the competence mutant strains P1538 ( comE) (A), JKP158 ( comDrev) (B), P1535 ( comDfor) (C), P1537 ( comAB) (D), and TMP133 ( comDE) (F). (E) Competitive colonization of the Smr competence-activated comE(D143Y) strain MSP110 versus the Kmr comE+ control. (G) Reference competition of the Smr wild-type strain P1534 versus the Kmr comE+ control strain JKP102, which has the Janus cassette in the intergenic region downstream of comE. Values are displayed as medians and interquartile ranges for colonization of at least 11 pups with each pair of strains. Differences in colonization levels between pairs of competing strains at each time point were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's correction (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001). The dotted lines represent the limit of detection of the assay.
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. (A) Competitive indices based on colonization levels at day 7 for the experiments shown in Fig. 2. Values are shown as medians and interquartile ranges. The competitive index for each pair of competing strains was compared with that for the reference competition (filled bar [wild type versus comE+ strain]), using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's correction (*, P < 0.05; ***, P < 0.001; ns, not significant). (B) Competitive indices for growth in vitro. Values represent means ± standard deviations based on at least three independent determinations. The competitive index for each pair of strains was compared with that for the reference competition (filled bar [wild type versus comE+ strain]), using analysis of variance with Dunnett's multiple comparison correction (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ns, not significant).
|
comE strain might be explained by differential recovery of the mutant and wild-type strains during the washing process, we dissected nasal tissues 8 days after inoculation to directly assess colonization levels. A log competitive index favoring the
comE strain (median, –2.38; range, –1.56 to –3.37) was also observed with tissue samples, with a value similar to that obtained from nasal washings. To assess the potential impact of in vivo recombination between strains during mixed colonization, we examined 96 colonies that were recovered from nasal washings on plates without either streptomycin or kanamycin throughout the course of the experiment. These colonies were tested to determine their resistance patterns. No colonies were found that were either sensitive to both antibiotics or resistant to both antibiotics. It is therefore unlikely that competition from an in vivo recombinant that may have gained fitness through the restoration of a streptomycin-sensitive rpsL allele explains the displacement of the streptomycin-resistant wild type during mixed colonization.
We expected that blockade of the competence pathway by deletion of comD—located immediately upstream of comE and also required for competence—would result in an enhancement of fitness similar to that with comE deletion. This effect was not observed with a comD deletion mutant constructed with the Janus cassette inserted in the same direction as transcription of the comCDE locus (
comDfor) (Fig. 2C and 3A). Instead, the
comDfor mutation caused a significant increase in competitive index relative to the reference competition value. Because the competitive index is calculated from the ratio of streptomycin-resistant to kanamycin-resistant bacteria, this elevated value indicates a loss of colonization fitness in the kanamycin-resistant
comDfor strain. When the comD deletion was constructed with the Janus cassette in the reverse orientation (
comDrev) (Fig. 2B and 3A), however, the resulting strain showed an enhanced colonization fitness similar to that of the
comE strain.
A strain with a deletion spanning both comD and comE was also tested in the colonization model. This
comDE mutation did not cause a change in the competitive index relative to the reference competition value (Fig. 2F and 3A). The interpretation of this result, however, is complicated by the fact that this mutation, unlike the comD and comE single mutations, also significantly slowed the growth of the bacteria in vitro, as described below (Fig. 3B).
Impact of competence mutations on comE expression.
Because the difference observed between the
comDfor and
comDrev strains suggested the likelihood of a polar effect on the downstream comE gene, comE transcript levels were measured by quantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 4). The
comDfor mutation resulted in constitutive expression of comE at a level similar to that achieved by the wild type activated by CSP. The
comDrev mutation, in contrast, reduced the baseline level of comE transcripts to below that of the unstimulated wild type and prevented induction of comE expression in response to CSP. As anticipated, the competence-activating comE(D143Y) mutation resulted in increased expression of comE, even in the absence of stimulation by exogenous CSP.
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Relative levels of comE transcripts in strains P1534 (wild type), P1538 ( comE), JKP158 ( comDrev), P1535 ( comDfor), and MSP110 [comE(D143Y)], measured by quantitative RT-PCR. Values are normalized to transcript levels for the wild type after stimulation with exogenous CSP (assigned a value of 1) and represent means ± standard deviations for RNAs isolated from three independent cultures of each strain. No transcript was detected for the comE strain; values shown for this strain represent the limit of detection of the assays. Expression levels were compared to that of the wild type after treatment with CSP, using analysis of variance with Dunnett's multiple comparison correction (**, P < 0.01; ns, not significant). CSP treatment (filled bars) caused a significant increase in comE expression for the wild type (P < 0.01) but did not significantly change comE transcript levels for any of the other strains.
|
comAB and wild-type strains during colonization.
Deletion of comAB did not significantly affect colonization compared to that of the reference competition (Fig. 2D and 3A) when the
comAB and wild-type strains were inoculated at equivalent levels. Because comAB encodes the transporter required for export and processing of CSP, the
comAB strain does not develop spontaneous competence yet retains the ability to respond to CSP released by other bacteria. During cocolonization with bacteria that have the potential to develop competence, such stimulation might mask differences between the
comAB strain and the wild type. However, because the
comAB strain cannot participate in the autocatalytic loop by which activation of the competence system promotes further release of CSP, the potential for cross-stimulation should be reduced if the ratio of wild-type to
comAB bacteria is decreased. We therefore determined the competitive index for cocolonization with the wild-type and
comAB strains inoculated at a 1:5 ratio. Under these conditions, the competitive index was significantly higher than that observed with inoculation of the same strains at a 1:1 ratio (Fig. 5), corresponding to increased recovery of the streptomycin-resistant wild-type strain relative to that of the
comAB strain. This finding suggests that the
comAB mutation reduces colonization fitness unless stimulation from CSP released by the wild type is available to activate competence in the
comAB strain.
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effect of inoculum ratio on competitive colonization with S. pneumoniae. Competitive indices are based on colonization levels at day 7 for the strain pairs P1534 (Smr wild type)-P1537 (Kmr comAB) and MSP110 [Smr comE(D143Y)]-JKP102 (Kmr comE+ control). Inoculum ratios were varied as indicated; data for 1:1 inoculation experiments are from experiments shown in Fig. 3. Values are shown as medians and interquartile ranges. Differences in competitive indices at the two inoculum ratios were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's correction (**, P < 0.01; ns, not significant).
|
Dual colonization with the comE(D143Y) strain and the Kmr comE+ control strain presents another situation in which cross-stimulation may reduce the differences between strains. In this case, activation of the competence circuit in the comE(D143Y) strain may cause enhanced release of CSP and thereby promote increased development of competence in the control strain. We therefore tested whether reducing the ratio of comE(D143Y) to control strain bacteria would impact the outcome of competitive colonization. Although a small increase in the competitive index was observed, this difference was not significant (Fig. 5). It is possible, however, that even at a reduced density the comE(D143Y) strain is able to stimulate competence in the control strain, because unlike the
comAB strain, for which a density-dependent effect was observed, the control strain has a normal competence circuit and should be able to participate in autocatalytic activation of competence once it begins to be triggered.
Competence mutations and growth in vitro.
Competence activation through exposure to CSP is known to delay pneumococcal growth (24). We therefore tested the impact of our set of competence mutations during competitive growth in vitro to determine whether the effects seen during colonization might be attributed to general effects on growth rate. A competitive index for growth in vitro was defined as the ratio of CFU/ml of streptomycin-resistant versus kanamycin-resistant bacteria for the two strains after 4.5 h of growth divided by the ratio immediately after mixing. The competitive indices consistently showed that kanamycin-resistant strains containing the Janus cassette grew better in vitro than the isogenic streptomycin-resistant control strain (Fig. 3B). Deletion of comAB, comD, or comE did not significantly change the competitive index relative to that of the reference competition in vitro. The comDE deletion, however, was associated with a significant increase in the competitive index in vitro, reflecting reduced recovery of the kanamycin-resistant
comDE strain relative to the streptomycin-resistant control. The comE(D143Y) competence-activating mutation also significantly decreased recovery of the mutant strain (streptomycin resistant in this case) relative to the Kmr comE+ control strain following in vitro growth. Because the pattern of competitive indices measured in vitro did not mirror that seen in vivo, we concluded that the fitness effects of the comE and comD mutations are specific for colonization. The slow growth of the
comDE and comE(D143Y) strains in vitro, however, may have affected the ability of these two strains to compete during nasal colonization.
Competence activation is not responsible for
ciaRH colonization defect.
Deletion of the CiaRH two-component system impairs pneumococcal colonization in the background of a serotype 3 strain and increases expression of the competence regulon (29). In the serotype 2 background used in this study, deletion of ciaRH also triggered spontaneous transformation that was not observed in the wild-type strain (Fig. 1B). The level of transformation measured in the
ciaRH strain, however, was substantially lower than the level achieved by the wild type in the presence of CSP. We then asked whether this intermediate level of competence activation contributes to the colonization defect seen with ciaRH deletion. Second mutations inactivating competence were constructed in the context of a ciaRH deletion. As seen with the serotype 3 strain studied previously, the
ciaRH mutation severely attenuated colonization in the serotype 2 background even in the absence of competition from another pneumococcal strain (Fig. 6A). Insertion of the Janus cassette to delete either comAB or comE did not correct the colonization defect caused by loss of ciaRH (Fig. 6B).
![]() View larger version (7K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Nasal colonization with single strains of S. pneumoniae. (A) Wild type (P1534) and ciaRH (JKP109) strains; (B) ciaRH comAB (JKP114) and ciaRH comE (JKP116) strains. Values are shown as medians and interquartile ranges for colonization of groups of 10 to 13 pups with each strain. Differences in colonization levels between the wild-type and ciaRH strains at each time point were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's correction (***, P < 0.001); neither of the double mutant strains showed significant differences from the ciaRH strain at any of the time points. The dotted line represents the limit of detection of the assay.
|
|
|
|---|
The magnitude of the competitive effect associated with the
comE mutation was substantial, corresponding to an increase in relative abundance of the
comE strain of 2.14 log10 units (nearly 140-fold) over 7 days. Of this increase, 1.28 log10 units (18.9-fold change) can be attributed directly to deletion of comE, as the excess effect beyond that seen with a control insertion of the resistance cassette directly downstream of comE. This change would correspond to a 50% daily increase in relative abundance of a comE null mutant in competition with wild-type S. pneumoniae. Pneumococcus therefore appears to incur a substantial fitness cost in order to maintain a functional comE gene compared to the potential advantage that might be gained by its elimination. The nature of the selective advantage for which ComE is nonetheless retained remains to be elucidated. These experiments, however, provide evidence that this function is unlikely to be utilization of the competence pathway for acquisition of extracellular DNA as a nutrient on the mucosal surface, as suggested for transformation in other bacteria (9, 28), because loss of this resource would be predicted to impair rather than improve colonization fitness.
The observation that comD deletion—also blocking competence—does not similarly enhance colonization unless the mutation is constructed in a manner that causes a polar decrease in comE transcription indicates that the signaling events that control fitness for colonization differ from those that regulate the development of competence. Several signaling models could be considered to explain such discordant effects of comD and comE deletions during colonization. (i) The unactivated form of ComE could regulate the transcription of an additional set of genes beyond those induced by activation of ComE in response to CSP. If such a set included genes affecting colonization, a deletion of comE causing loss of the ComE protein entirely would be predicted to impact colonization differently from a loss of comD, causing only inactivation of ComE. Although activation of the ComE response regulator is often presumed to correspond to its phosphorylation, this correspondence has not been demonstrated experimentally. Studies of two-component signaling in other organisms have revealed diversity in signaling architectures in which stimuli may regulate either kinase or phosphatase activities of sensor kinases and in which dephosphorylation occasionally may correspond to the "active" state of a response regulator (31). We therefore consider changes in ComE signaling in terms of its activation (i.e., the signaling state required for induction of genetic competence in response to detection of CSP by the ComD sensor kinase) rather than its phosphorylation. (ii) ComE could be activated by factors in vivo, independent of the ComD sensor kinase. In vitro, however, none of our mutants lacking comD displayed competence. Alternative phosphate donors that might activate ComE could include noncognate histidine kinases as well as the small-molecule phosphate donor acetyl phosphate (37). The efficiency of ComE activation through such an alternative pathway—if activation corresponds to phosphorylation—might be enhanced in the
comD strain if ComD possesses, in addition to its kinase activity, a phosphatase activity that is able to dephosphorylate its cognate response regulator, such as that described for other sensor kinases (13, 19). The lack of effect on colonization seen with the competence-activating comE(D143Y) mutation, however, provides evidence against this model. (iii) ComD could interact with an alternative target, such as a noncognate response regulator. Such cross talk with another two-component signaling system could be facilitated in the absence of the cognate response regulator ComE. This model may be excluded because colonization enhancement is seen in the absence of ComD in the
comDrev mutant.
Of these models, the first—involving effects of the unactivated form of ComE—is supported by the observation that the
comDrev mutant displays enhanced colonization similar to that of the
comE mutant. This
comDrev mutation causes a polar decrease in comE transcription. In contrast, the
comDfor mutation increases comE transcription and results in reduced colonization fitness. Because the
comDfor strain lacks the ComD histidine kinase, increased comE transcription in this background is expected to result in overexpression of the unactivated form of the ComE response regulator. Consistent with this prediction, the
comDfor strain does not display competence in either the presence or absence of CSP. Our results therefore suggest that increases in unactivated ComE impair colonization, while decreases in unactivated ComE enhance colonization.
Although this model would also predict enhanced colonization by the
comDE double mutant strain, this strain unexpectedly displayed an in vitro growth deficit not seen with any of the individual mutations in comD or comE. The basis for this growth deficit is uncertain, but as a consequence, comparisons of the impact of competence mutations on colonization are most appropriately focused on those strains that do not affect growth in vitro. We cannot currently determine whether the growth deficit of the
comDE strain counterbalances a colonization advantage associated with the loss of comE to produce the neutral result observed in vivo.
The density-dependent colonization defect associated with the
comAB strain provides further support for the hypothesis that unactivated ComE impairs colonization. In this strain, ComE activation would depend on cross-stimulation by CSP released by the cocolonizing wild-type strain. When the wild type is abundant, the potential for such stimulation would be increased, and under these conditions, colonization by the
comAB strain was strong. With the wild type being less abundant, however, the potential for ComE activation in the
comAB mutant would be reduced. Indeed, when the ratio of wild-type to
comAB bacteria in the inoculum was reduced, the mutant strain displayed decreased fitness for colonization. The density dependence of the
comAB colonization phenotype furthermore argues against the second signaling model presented above (i.e., in vivo activation of ComE through an alternative pathway). If activation of ComE during colonization were independent of CSP, a pattern consistent with cross-stimulation of the
comAB strain by CSP released by the wild type would not be expected. The observation of this density-dependent effect also provides indirect evidence that the competence system is activated at some level in the wild type during colonization, because release of CSP would be necessary for cross-stimulation of the
comAB strain. Although we have attempted to demonstrate this activation directly through transcriptome amplification and quantitative RT-PCR performed directly on nasal washing samples, the sensitivity of these assays has not been consistently high enough to measure transcript levels from these limited samples. It should be noted that similar cross-stimulation by extracellular CSP is unlikely to occur with the
comD and
comE mutants because these strains can neither respond to CSP nor participate in the autocatalytic loop that amplifies its production during competence.
The observation that the competence-activating comE(D143Y) mutation does not significantly impact colonization further supports the model that levels of the unactivated form of ComE, rather than the activated form, affect colonization potential. A density-dependent effect on fitness might also have been anticipated during cocolonization with the wild-type and comE(D143Y) strains if the latter increased the level of ComE activation in the former. Although the competitive index shifted slightly toward less strong colonization by the wild type when the abundance of the activated comE(D143Y) strain was reduced, this change was not significant. The potential to observe a density-dependent fitness effect may be reduced in this situation (compared to the competition between
comAB and wild-type strains) because CSP from the comE(D143Y) strain may trigger a positive feedback loop, amplifying its production by the cocolonizing wild type even with a reduced population of comE(D143Y) bacteria. Alternatively, the level of spontaneous competence activation in the wild type during colonization may be high enough that additional stimulation by the comE(D143Y) strain does not produce a substantial effect. Finally, the finding that secondary mutations blocking competence do not restore colonization fitness to the
ciaRH strain indicates that the colonization deficit of the
ciaRH strain is not due to its enhanced competence activation and is likewise consistent with colonization being affected by the unactivated form of ComE.
Although the cause of the colonization advantage conferred by loss of unactivated ComE is not currently known, it appears likely to stem from transcriptional effects on an uncharacterized portion of the ComE regulon governed by unactivated ComE. The colonization advantage appears to be specific to the in vivo environment, as competitive indices measured during growth in vitro did not mirror the results of competition during colonization. We have examined the impact of mutations in the competence pathway on adherence to cultured epithelial cell lines and have not observed substantial changes associated with deletion of comE. Pneumococcal biofilm formation was recently linked to the induction of competence as well (25). Our observation of robust colonization by the
comE strain, however, suggests either that such biofilms are not required for efficient colonization of the infant rat nasopharynx or that alternative pathways are sufficient to stimulate biofilm formation in vivo. S. pneumoniae has also been demonstrated to undergo allolysis, or fratricide, in which competent pneumococci lyse a subpopulation of noncompetent pneumococci present in the same culture (reviewed in reference 6). While this process is likely to be important in generating the pool of extracellular DNA available for transformation, our study suggests that such allolysis does not determine the outcome of competition between strains during colonization. Further work will be required to define the regulatory events controlled by the unactivated form of ComE and the impact of these events on colonization.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant K08 AI052129 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to M.E.S. as well as by institutional funding from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Published ahead of print on 28 April 2008. ![]()
Present address: Division of Medical Sciences, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St., Boston, MA 02115. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»