Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Infection and Immunity, May 2009, p. 2168-2176, Vol. 77, No. 5
0019-9567/09/$08.00+0 doi:10.1128/IAI.01350-08
Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Biomedical Research Center, Ulsan University Hospital, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 682-714, Republic of Korea,1 Immunomodulation Research Center and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Ulsan, Ulsan 680-749, Republic of Korea,2 Cardiovascular Medical Research Center and Department of Prescriptionology, University of Dongguk, Gyeongju City, Gyeongbuk 780-714, Republic of Korea,3 Department of Bio-Technology, Hoseo University, 29-1 Sechuli, Baebang-Myun, Asan City, Chungnam-Do 336-795, Republic of Korea4
Received 5 November 2008/ Returned for modification 4 January 2009/ Accepted 12 February 2009
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 4-1BB (CD137) receptor, a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily (TNFRSF 9), is expressed on activated T cells (43), and the in vivo effects of 4-1BB activation on T-cell-dependent immune responses, such as eradication of established tumors (29), antiviral responses (1), and enhancement of the memory pool of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells (34), have been well defined. However, recent findings indicate that 4-1BB activation also plays an important role in other immune cells. 4-1BB is constitutively expressed on innate immune cells, including neutrophils (24), dendritic cells (10), natural killer (NK) cells (28), mast cells (31), and eosinophils (9). Its activation results in proliferation, gamma interferon secretion, and tumor rejection by NK cells (28); the production of cytokines by dendritic cells and the expression of costimulatory molecules on these cells (10); proliferation, survival, and cytokine production in human monocytes (21); and abrogation of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-mediated antiapoptotic functions of human neutrophils (17). Previously, we reported that 4-1BB-deficient (4-1BB–/–) mice are very susceptible to L. monocytogenes infection because the antibacterial activity of their neutrophils is defective (24). Furthermore, pretreatment of agonistic anti-4-1BB monoclonal antibody (MAb) markedly increased the survival of L. monocytogenes-infected 4-1BB+/+ mice. In this study, we further characterized the mechanism of 4-1BB-mediated protection of L. monocytogenes-infected mice. We found that activation of 4-1BB in the early phase of L. monocytogenes infection rapidly stimulated the induction of proinflammatory cytokines/chemokines and the subsequent recruitment and activation of neutrophils and monocytes into the bacterium-infected livers.
|
|
|---|
Antibodies and reagents.
Hybridoma cells (3E1 and 3H3) were a kind gift of R. Mittler (Emory University, Atlanta, GA). 3E1, 3H3, and RB6-8C5 cells were purified from ascites fluid, and control rat immunoglobulin G (IgG) was purified from rat serum using a protein G column (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Anti-4-1BB MAb (3E1) was conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) for flow cytometry. The following antibodies were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA) unless otherwise stated: FITC-conjugated rat IgG2a, purified anti-CD16/CD32 (Fc
III/IIR), FITC-conjugated anti-Ly6G (1A8), FITC-conjugated anti-CD62L (MEL-14), biotin-conjugated anti-Ly6C (AL-21), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-neutrophil (7/4; Serotec, United Kingdom), PE-conjugated anti-F4/80 (BM8; eBioscience, San Diego, CA), PE-conjugated anti-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II (SF1-1.1), PE-conjugated anti-CD4 (L3T4), PE-conjugated anti-CD8 (53-6.7), PE-conjugated anti-DX5
, PE-conjugated anti-CD11c (HL3), PE-conjugated anti-TREM-1(174031; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), PE-conjugated anti-CXCR2 (242216; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), and PE-conjugated anti-CD11b (M170) MAbs. To produce heat-inactivated 3E1 (HI-3E1), 3E1 was incubated for 20 min at 80°C.
Bacteria and infection of mice. L. monocytogenes was obtained from the Korean Type Culture Collection (ATCC 19111). The bacteria were grown in brain heart infusion broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) at 37°C for 18 h, and aliquots were frozen at –80°C. In each experiment, the viability of the frozen aliquots, which was always more than 90%, was confirmed by plating them on brain heart infusion agar (Difco). Mice were i.v. infected via the left tail vein with L. monocytogenes suspended in 200 µl of PBS, and 100 µg of rat IgG or 3E1 in 200 µl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was i.v. injected into the mice via the right tail vein on the indicated days. For depletion of neutrophils, anti-Gr-1 MAb RB6-8C5 (500 µg/mouse) was intraperitoneally injected 2 days before infection.
Isolation of HILs. Hepatic infiltrated leukocytes (HILs) were prepared as described previously (24). In brief, a liver was perfused with Ca2+ Mg2+-free Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS) and pressed through a stainless steel mesh, and the leukocytes were purified on 40% to 70% Percoll gradients (Amersham Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden). The cells were washed with HBSS three times and used for fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis and for measuring phagocytic activity and reactive oxygen species (RO) generation. For FACS analysis, cells were washed with FACS buffer (PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% sodium azide), incubated with Fc Block (2.4G2) for 10 min on ice, and stained with antibodies for specific markers. All samples were subsequently analyzed by FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). To obtain highly pure neutrophils and monocytes, the isolated hepatic leukocytes were sorted to CD11b+ Gr-1int or CD11b+ Gr-1hi cells using a FACSvantage SE (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).
Isolation of cells from bone marrow.
Neutrophils were isolated from bone marrow according to the method of Lowell and Berton (26) with minor modifications. Long bones from mice (humerus, femur, and tibia) were removed, the ends were clipped, and then they were flushed using a 27-gauge needle and ice-cold Ca2+ Mg2+-free HBSS. Clumps of marrow were broken up by repeated pipetting. Cells from the marrow were centrifuged at 500 x g at 4°C for 5 min and resuspended in 4 ml of HBSS. They were placed in a 15-ml polypropylene tube and layered over a four-step gradient (52%, 65%, 70%, and 75% Percoll diluted with HBSS). The tube was centrifuged at 1,500 x g for 30 min at 4°C in a swinging-bucket rotor using the slow brake to prevent disruption of the layers during deceleration. The cells were then removed from the polymorphonuclear-leukocyte-enriched fraction at the interface of the 70% and 75% layers, diluted with 10 ml of HBSS, and sedimented for 7 min at 1,500 x g. Monocytes were isolated from bone marrow by immunomagnetic-bead depletion with streptavidin microbeads after incubation with biotin-conjugated CD4, CD8
, MHC class II, B220, CD43, and CD24. After incubation with antibodies, the negatively fractionated cells were obtained with a magnetically activated cell sorter (Miltenyi). The cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics and counted. Routinely, purities as determined by flow cytometric analysis were >85% for neutrophils and >90% for monocytes.
Determination of viable L. monocytogenes in liver and spleen. L. monocytogenes-infected mice were anesthetized with ketamine, and their livers were perfused with sterile RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS to wash bacteria out of their blood vessels. The numbers of viable bacteria (CFU) in livers and spleens were determined by plating serial dilutions of organ homogenates in PBS containing 0.05% Triton X-100 and counting the colonies.
Histology and immunostaining. Livers were excised on the indicated days postinfection (p.i.), fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and embedded in paraffin. Deparaffinized sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Sigma-Aldrich). For in situ detection of cells infiltrated into the liver, frozen 6-µm-thick liver sections were prepared at 12 h p.i. and stained with FITC-conjugated anti-CD11b MAb and PE-conjugated anti-Gr-1 MAb or FITC-conjugated anti-CD11b MAb and PE-conjugated F4/80 MAb. Slides were mounted in GVA mounting solution (Zymed, San Francisco, CA) and examined using a laser scanning confocal microscope (FV500; Olympus, London, United Kingdom).
Measurement of cytokines by the CBA method. Mice were killed; blood and whole liver tissues were collected, weighed, and homogenized in an equal volume of PBS containing protease inhibitors; and the supernatants were collected by centrifugation. The cytokines in the supernatants were quantified using a cytometric bead array (CBA) kit (BD Biosciences) on a FACSCaliber cytometer equipped with CellQuest Pro and CBA software (Becton Dickinson). For measuring the production of cytokines from cultured neutrophils or monocytes, isolated cells were seeded at 4 x 105 cells/well in a 96-well culture plate in RPMI 1640 medium (containing 10% FBS and antibiotics) and cultured with combinations of rat IgG, 3E1 (5 µg/ml), HI-3E1 (5 µg/ml), and heat-killed L. monocytogenes (4 x 106 bacteria/well). After 24 and 48 h, culture supernatants were collected, and cytokines in the supernatants were quantified by the CBA method, as described above.
RT-PCR and RPA. Total RNA was isolated from liver tissues using TRIzol (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), and levels of specific cytokine/chemokine mRNAs were determined by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and the RNase protection assay (RPA) method, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Riboquant; BD Pharmingen). For RT-PCR, 2 µg of RNA was reverse transcribed using primers specific for MIP-2 (forward, 5'-CCACTCTCAAGGGCGGTCAA; reverse, 3'-CCCCTTATCCCCAGTCTCTTTCAC), interleukin 1β (IL-1β) (forward, 5'-TGAAATGCCACCTTTTGACA; reverse, 3'-AGCTCATATGGGTCCGACAG), IL-12p35 (forward, 5'-GATGACATGGTGAAGACGGCC; reverse, 3'-GGAGGTTTCTGGCGCAGAGT), IL-12p40(forward, 5'-CTGGCCAGTACACCTGCCAC; reverse, 3'-GTGCTTCCAACGCCAGTTCA), and GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) (forward, 5'-ATCATCTCCGCCCCTTCTGC; reverse, 3'-CCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAG). The PCR products were stained with ethidium bromide after electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels. For RPA, 5 µg of total RNA was hybridized with [32P]UTP-labeled riboprobes (mCK-2b and mCK-5c; BD Pharmingen) overnight at 56°C. After hybridization, unhybridized single-stranded RNA was digested with RNase. The protected RNA was then purified by phenol-chloroform extraction and ethanol precipitation. The samples were subjected to electrophoresis on a 6% polyacrylamide/7 M urea gel. The gel was dried and subjected to autoradiographic analysis.
Determination of phagocytosis and ROS. For determination of phagocytosis, HILs were prepared, stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD11b and Cy5-conjugated anti-Gr-1 MAb, and incubated with FITC-labeled dextran (Molecular Probes, OR) at a final concentration of 0.5 mg/ml. After 0, 10, 20, or 60 min of incubation, the cells were cooled to 4°C, washed four times with cold PBS, and analyzed by FACS. For measuring ROS generation, HILs were stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD11b MAb and Cy5-conjugated anti-Gr-1 MAb. The oxidation-sensitive dye 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA) (Molecular Probes, St. Louis, MO) (2 µM) was added and incubated at 37°C for 25 min. Samples were washed and analyzed by FACS for fluorescent signals within the CD11b+ Gr-1int or CD11b+ Gr-1hi populations (see below).
Statistical analysis. Statistical evaluation of differences between experimental groups was performed with the log rank test for mouse survival curves and with Student's t test.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (69K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Anti-4-1BB MAb administration rescues L. monocytogenes-infected mice. (A) Groups of eight mice were infected with 2 x 105 L. monocytogenes bacteria/mouse at 0 h and injected with 3E1 (100 µg) at the indicated times. Survival was monitored daily up to 30 days after infection. (B) Anti-4-1BB MAb administration is effective at up to 10 LD100. Groups of 10 mice were infected with 5 x 105, 1 x 106, or 2 x 106 L. monocytogenes bacteria/mouse and injected with 100 µg of 3E1 or rat IgG. (C) Mice were infected with 2 x 105 L. monocytogenes bacteria, and the numbers of CFU in the spleen and liver were determined on days 1, 2, 3, 5, and 14 p.i. The data are from one representative of three independent experiments and are expressed as means plus standard errors. **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. ND, not detected. (D) Livers and spleens from the mice in panel C were collected on day 4 p.i., paraffin sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Magnification: a, c, e, and g, x20; b and f, x400; and d and h, x100.
|
Anti-4-1BB MAb induces rapid recruitment of CD11b+ Gr-1int and CD11b+ Gr-1hi cells into the liver.
To identify the cellular/molecular mechanisms underlying the remarkable effects of 3E1 on L. monocytogenes infection, we characterized the cells that infiltrated the livers of infected mice. For this, we infected mice with a sublethal dose of 2 x 104 L. monocytogenes bacteria (0.1 LD100). HILs were isolated from the L. monocytogenes-infected mice, and leukocyte subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 2A, at 16 h p.i. the numbers of CD4+, CD8+, B220+ (B cells), or DX5
+ (NK) cells in HILs were little increased by L. monocytogenes infection and were comparable to those in the 3E1- and control antibody-treated mice. In contrast, the number of CD11b+ Gr-1+ cells was greatly increased by L. monocytogenes infection in both the control and 3E1-treated mice. However, the 3E1-treated mice had much higher numbers of these cells than the controls. Detailed kinetic analysis revealed that the CD11b+ Gr-1+ cells were divided into two subsets, CD11b+ Gr-1int and CD11b+ Gr-1hi, whose numbers depended on the level of Gr-1 expression; there was a higher percentage of these two cell populations in the HILs of 3E1-treated mice than in those of control mice at 4 and 8 h p.i. (Fig. 2B). The total number of these two cell populations in the liver was also higher in 3E1 mice than control mice between 4 and 16 h p.i. (Fig. 2C and D). However, at 24 h p.i. and thereafter, the numbers and percentages of the two types of cell were comparable in the 3E1-treated and control mice. In parallel with the increased number of CD11b+ Gr-1int and CD11b+ Gr-1hi cells, 3E1-treated mice had lower numbers of L. monocytogenes bacteria than control mice at 8 and 16 h p.i. (Fig. 2E). Furthermore, in agreement with the flow cytometric results (Fig. 2B), immunohistochemical microscopic observation revealed more CD11b+ Gr-1+ and CD11b+ F4/80+ cells in liver sections of the 3E1-treated mice than in those of the controls (Fig. 2F). F4/80 is a surface marker for monocytes/macrophages.
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Anti-4-BB MAb treatment rapidly recruits CD11b+ Gr-1int and CD11b+ Gr-1hi cells to the livers of L. monocytogenes-infected mice with a concurrent decrease in the number of L. monocytogenes bacteria in the liver. (A to D) Mice were infected with 2 x 104 L. monocytogenes bacteria and treated with 100 µg of 3E1 or rat IgG. At the indicated time points, they were anesthetized, the livers were perfused with PBS, and HILs were isolated as described in Materials and Methods. (A) Numbers of CD4+, CD8+, B220+, DX5 +, and CD11b+ Gr-1+ cells in the livers of L. monocytogenes-infected mice. HILs isolated from mice at 16 h p.i. were stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD4, -CD8, -B220, -DX5 , or -CD11b or FITC-conjugated anti-Gr-1 antibody and analyzed by FACS. Each point represents the mean plus standard error (SE) of five mice per group. (B) Time-dependent increase of CD11b+ Gr-1int and CD11b+ Gr-1hi cells. HILs from L. monocytogenes-infected mice were isolated at the indicated times, stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD11b and FITC-conjugated anti-Gr-1 antibody, and analyzed by FACS. (C and D) Total numbers of CD11b+ Gr-1int (C) and CD11b+ Gr-1hi cells (D) were calculated from the number of HILs per liver, and the proportion of each subset was obtained by FACS analysis. (E) Mice were infected with 2 x 104 L. monocytogenes bacteria and injected with 100 µg of 3E1 or rat IgG. At the indicated times p.i., mice were killed, livers were isolated, and the number of CFU/liver was determined. The results are the means plus SE of five mice per group. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. (F) Immunohistochemical identification of CD11b+ F4/80+ and CD11b+ Gr-1+ cells in livers of L. monocytogenes-infected and 3E1-treated mice. Mice were infected with 2 x 104 CFU L. monocytogenes and injected with 100 µg of 3E1 or rat IgG. At 8 h p.i., frozen liver sections were prepared and stained for CD11b (green) and Gr-1 (red) or CD11b (green) and F4/80 (red). The sections were viewed and photographed using a laser scanning confocal fluorescence microscope system (magnification, x200).
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. In the livers of L. monocytogenes-infected mice, the CD11b+ Gr-1int cells are monocytes and CD11b+ Gr-1hi cells are neutrophils. Mice were infected with 2 x 104 L. monocytogenes bacteria and injected with 100 µg of 3E1. At 16 h p.i., HILs were isolated, stained with antibodies, and analyzed by FACS. (A) Cells were double stained with PE-conjugated anti-CD11b and FITC-conjugated anti-Gr-1 antibodies and gated on CD11b+ Gr-1int (R2) and CD11b+ Gr-1hi (R3). R2 and R3 cells were further analyzed by SSC and forward scatter (FSC) parameters. (B) Expression of surface markers on CD11b+ Gr-1int cells and CD11b+ Gr-1hi cells. HILs were triple stained with antibodies for CD11b, Gr-1, and each surface marker. After being gated on CD11b+ Gr-1int (R2) and CD11b+ Gr-1hi (R3) as in panel A, R2 and R3 cells were further analyzed for the expression of 7/4, F4/80, Mac-3, Ly6C, Ly6G, or CXCR2. (C) Nuclear morphology reveals that CD11b+ Gr-1int cells are monocytes and CD11b+ Gr-1hi cells are neutrophils. The R2 and R3 cells in panel A were sorted by FACS, cytospun, and stained with Diff-Quik. The top row shows the purity of the sorted cells, and bottom row shows photomicrographs (magnification, x1,000). The data are representative of experiments repeated three times with four mice per group.
|
) and its receptor (8, 15), IL-6 (7), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1) and its receptor CCR2 (22, 40, 41), IL-12 (39), or gamma interferon (16) are much more susceptible to L. monocytogenes infection. We determined cytokine/chemokine levels in the liver at early times of infection. As shown in Fig. 4A, levels of TNF-
, IL-6, and MCP-1 in control antibody-treated mice did not change up to 16 h p.i. In contrast, the levels of those cytokines in the 3E1-treated mice started to increase as early as 30 min p.i. and were significantly higher than those of control mice. In 3E1-treated mice, TNF-
and IL-6 peaked at 1 h p.i. and MCP-1 at 2 h p.i. Thereafter, cytokine levels gradually decreased to basal levels at 16 h p.i. The induction profiles of cytokines in sera were the same as in the liver (data not shown). An increase in the transcript levels of MIP-2, IL-1β, and IL-12 was also observed (Fig. 4B). HI-3E1 had no effect on the levels of TNF-
, suggesting there was no contamination with endotoxin in our system (Fig. 4C).
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Anti-4-1BB MAb administration to L. monocytogenes-infected mice rapidly enhances levels of TNF- , IL-6, and MCP-1 in the liver. (A and B) Mice were infected with 2 x 104 L. monocytogenes bacteria and injected with 100 µg of 3E1 or rat IgG. At the indicated times p.i., the livers were perfused with PBS. The concentrations of cytokines in liver homogenates were determined using a CBA kit (A), and message levels by RT-PCR (B). (C) Naïve or L. monocytogenes-infected mice were i.v. injected with PBS, rat IgG, 3E1, or HI-3E1. After 2 h, the levels of TNF- in liver homogenates were determined. The data are representative of experiments repeated three times with three mice per group. Data are means ± standard errors. ***, P < 0.001.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Anti-4-1BB MAb administration to L. monocytogenes-infected mice induces activation and maturation of monocytes (Mo) and neutrophils (Neu) in HILs. Mice were infected with 2 x 104 L. monocytogenes bacteria and injected with 100 µg of 3E1 or rat IgG. At 16 h p.i., HILs were isolated and stained with PE-conjugated anti-Gr-1 and Cy-conjugated anti-CD11b MAbs. (A) Anti-4-1BB MAb-induced phagocytic activity. Cells were incubated with FITC-dextran for the indicated times, washed, and analyzed for FITC-positive cells among the CD11b+ Gr-1int or CD11b+ Gr-1hi cells by FACS. Gray histogram, cells kept on ice; dotted lines, cells from rat IgG-treated mice; solid lines, cells from 3E1-treated mice. (B) Anti-4-1BB MAb induces ROS generation. HILs were stained with 2 µM DCF-DA for 30 min and analyzed for DCF-DA-positive cells among CD11b+ Gr-1int or CD11b+ Gr-1hi gated cells by FACS. Open histogram, unstained cells; filled histogram, cells stained with DCF-DA. GeoM, geometric mean. (C) Anti-4-1BB MAb enhances the expression of maturation/activation surface markers on the monocytes and neutrophils of L. monocytogenes-infected mice. Mice were infected with 2 x 104 L. monocytogenes bacteria and injected with 100 µg of 3E1 or rat IgG. At 16 h p.i., HILs were isolated, stained with Cy-conjugated anti-CD11b, PE-conjugated anti-Gr-1, and FITC-conjugated surface marker antibodies. The cells were first gated on CD11b+ Gr-1int or CD11b+ Gr-1hi and analyzed for each expression marker. One experiment representative of three is shown.
|
In vitro stimulation of neutrophils by anti-4-1BB MAb causes production of IL-6 and TNF-
and upregulation of chemokine mRNAs.
Although 3E1 administration to L. monocytogenes-infected mice induced activation and infiltration of neutrophils and monocytes into the bacterium-infected livers, it was not clear whether 3E1 exerted its effects directly on those cells or whether the cells were secondarily activated by 3E1. Murine neutrophils constitutively express 4-1BB (24), but murine monocytes do not, unless they are induced to differentiate into dendritic cells (our unpublished data). Consistent with the status of 4-1BB expression on the surface of each cell type, we found that 3E1 could directly stimulate the expression of cytokine genes and proteins in neutrophils, but not in monocytes. As shown in Fig. 6A, 3E1 induced the production of IL-6 and TNF-
in cultures of neutrophils. 3E1 and heat-killed L. monocytogenes induced neutrophils to produce these cytokines synergistically, suggesting the existence of signaling cross talk between 4-1BB and pattern recognition receptors. MCP-1 was not produced in response to 3E1 and/or heat-killed L. monocytogenes in neutrophils. As expected, 3E1 did not induce monocytes to produce these cytokines, although heat-killed L. monocytogenes strongly induced IL-6, TNF-
, and MCP-1 production by the monocytes (Fig. 6A). 3E1 also strongly increased levels of chemokine/cytokine transcripts, such as those for IL-1β, IL-1R
, IL-6, MIF, Ltn, MIP-1
, MIP-1β, IP-10, and TCA-3 in neutrophils, as determined by the RPA method (Fig. 6B). In addition, we found that 3E1 significantly enhanced the phagocytic activities of neutrophils in vitro (Fig. 6C). These results suggest that 3E1 may directly activate neutrophils to be efficient bacterium-killing cells in L. monocytogenes-infected mice and that monocyte activation and recruitment into bacterium-infected livers may be secondary effects of 4-1BB stimulation of other cells.
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. In vitro addition of anti-4-1BB MAb induces production of cytokines/chemokines in neutrophils, but not monocytes. (A) Neutrophils and monocytes were purified from the bone marrow of naïve mice. The cells were cultured in 96-well culture plates with combinations of rat IgG (5 µg/ml), 3E1 (5 µg/ml), HI-3E1 (5 µg/ml), and heat-killed L. monocytogenes (HKLM) (1 x 104 bacteria/well). After 24 h, the concentrations of each cytokine/chemokine in the culture supernatants were measured with a CBA kit. (B) Total RNA was isolated from neutrophils cultured with control rat IgG or 3E1 for 12 h using TRIzol reagent. Cytokine and chemokine mRNA levels were quantified by an RNase protection assay as described in Materials and Methods. (C) Increase of neutrophil phagocytic activity by 4-1BB stimulation. Neutrophils purified from bone marrow were incubated with FITC-dextran (1 mg/ml) and rat IgG or 3EI (1 µg/ml) for the indicated times, washed, and analyzed by FACS for FITC-positive cells. The results are from one representative of three independent experiments and are expressed as means plus standard deviations. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01.
|
|
|
|---|
, MCP-1, and IL-6 in sera and livers as early as 30 min p.i., while levels of these proteins were little changed in L. monocytogenes-infected control mice up to 16 h p.i. (Fig. 4). Message levels of IL-1, IL-12, and MIP-2 were also highly increased by anti-4-1BB MAb administration. Some of these cytokines/chemokines in the L. monocytogenes-infected mice were possibly produced by 4-1BB-activated neutrophils, because direct addition of 3E1 to neutrophils increased proteins and message levels for these chemokines/cytokines, except for MCP-1 (Fig. 6). Because monocytes do not express 4-1BB and neutrophils do not produce MCP-1 in response to 4-1BB stimulation, the presence of MCP-1 in sera of 3E1-treated mice is probably not caused by direct action of 3E1 on neutrophils or monocytes. It may be induced by cells activated by bacterial products or by the IL-6 produced by the 4-1BB-stimulated neutrophils (Fig. 6). It has been shown that IL-6 binds to soluble IL-6 receptors, forming a complex that induces the endothelial cells, mesothelial cells, or fibroblasts at inflammatory sites to release MCP-1 (19, 37, 42). In parallel with the rapid induction of chemokine/cytokine levels, recruitment of neutrophils/monocytes into the livers of 3E1-treated mice was faster than that for control antibody-treated mice (Fig. 2B, C, and D). The liver plays a crucial role in eradicating blood-infected L. monocytogenes. It has been shown that most of the L. monocytogenes bacteria introduced via the i.v. route are trapped in the liver, bound to the surfaces of Kupffer cells (liver-resident macrophages), and are subsequently killed by infiltrated neutrophils (13). Depleting neutrophils or blocking mobilization of neutrophils into the liver in L. monocytogenes-infected mice results in a marked increase in the number of L. monocytogenes bacteria in the liver (6, 35), and the mice die of liver failure (36). Therefore, the rapid infiltration of neutrophils into livers is critical for early defense against L. monocytogenes infection, and this may be one mechanism of 4-1BB-mediated protection of L. monocytogenes-infected mice.
It is also conceivable that 4-1BB signaling on infiltrated neutrophils results in their activation to form efficient bacterium-killing cells. 4-1BB-4-1BB ligand (4-1BBL) interaction may well occur normally during bacterial infection. 4-1BBL is predominantly expressed on murine antigen-presenting cells (APCs), such as dendritic cells, monocytes/macrophages, and activated B cells (12, 33). Although expression of 4-1BBL on Kupffer cells has not been examined, there is a good possibility that it is also expressed on the surfaces of these cells, one of the liver-resident APCs. In addition, Kupffer cells bind neutrophils via CD11b/CD18-CD54 interaction in L. monocytogenes-infected mice (14). Thus, during Kupffer cell-neutrophil binding or some other kind of APC-neutrophil binding in the livers of L. monocytogenes-infected mice, 4-1BB-4-1BBL interaction may occur; the neutrophils may be activated by the 4-1BB signaling induced by 4-1BBL in APCs or by an administered anti-4-1BB MAb, and this could be synergized by bacterial products present on the surfaces of the APCs (Fig. 6).
In summary, our data show that 4-1BB stimulation in the early phase of L. monocytogenes infection contributes to the effective control of bacteria by rapid production of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines and subsequent infiltration of neutrophils and monocytes. A strategy for achieving 4-1BB activation using antibody or 4-1BBL molecules may be useful in the treatment of listeriosis.
This work was supported by the 2008 Research Fund of the University of Ulsan. S. A. Ju, J. D. Kim, and S. C. Lee were supported by a Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (KRF-2007-412-J00302), and S. M. Park, Q. T. Nguyen, and B. H. Seong were supported by the Second Project of BK21, the Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development.
Published ahead of print on 23 February 2009. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»