IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shepard, C C
Right arrow Articles by Walker, L L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shepard, C C
Right arrow Articles by Walker, L L

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1976 October; 14(4): 919-928

Immunity to Mycobacterium leprae infections in mice stimulated by M. leprae, BCG, and graft-versus-host reactions.

C C Shepard, R Van Landingham and L L Walker

ABSTRACT

Infections of mice with Mycobacterium leprae in one rear foot pad immunized them against a second infection in the other rear foot pad. Purified bacilli harvested from the first infection also produced immuniy when injection into the foot pads of previously uninfected mice. Injections of BCG afforded similar protection, but had no adjuvant effect on M. leprae. M. duvali, a cultivable mycobacterium that is reported to be more closely related antigenically to M. leprae than BCG is, provided much less protection against M. leprae challenge than BCG did. Moreover, when M. duvali was mixed with BCG, it was not any more effective than BCG alone. Graft-versus-host reactions, induced by injections of parental spleen cells into F1 hybrids, provided no protection against M. tuberculosis and M. marinum challenge. They gave moderate protection against M. leprae in one experiment but not in another with a different schedule. Allogenic spleen cells had a protective effect when injected locally into the infected foot pad. The effect produced by these injections of spleen cells was a delay in the appearance of bacterial growth; however, there was no decrease in the rate of logarithmic growth when it did appear and no reduction in the eventual plateau level.


Infect Immun. 1976 October; 14(4): 919-928




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1976 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.