IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertin, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertin, A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect Immun. 1992 August; 60(8): 3117-3121

Comparison of susceptibility of inbred and outbred infant mice to Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin STa.

A Bertin

Laboratoire de Pathologie Infectieuse et Immunologie, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre de Recherches de Tours, Nouzilly, France.

ABSTRACT

Comparison of the susceptibility of outbred OF1 and inbred BALB/c, C57BL/6, DBA/2, and CBA mice to heat-stable toxin (STa) of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli was made at different levels of induced secretion. STa was able to elicit fluid accumulation into the intestine of each strain of mice; however, quantitatively different results were obtained. Results were as usual expressed by gut weight/remaining body weight ratios. Fluid accumulation weight and fluid accumulation weight/remaining body weight ratios were also estimated. Values obtained for BALB/c and OF1 mice were never significantly different, but values for OF1 mice were significantly higher than those for DBA and C57BL/6 mice at the highest concentrations of toxin (toxin dilutions of 1/2, 1/4, and 1/5). At the highest toxin concentration, gut weight/remaining body weight ratio in C57BL/6 mice was significantly lower than that for every other strain, but the fluid accumulation value obtained for DBA mice did not differ from that for C57BL/6 mice. Fluid accumulation values for DBA mice were also significantly lower at toxin dilutions of 1/5 and 1/8 than those for every other strain, and this was also the case when estimating the fluid accumulation weight/remaining body weight ratio at a dilution of 1/8. Although the intestine of each strain of mice was able to respond to STa by fluid accumulation, differences in susceptibility of the STa receptor could exist and make DBA mice more resistant to enterotoxigenic E. coli diarrhea.


Infect Immun. 1992 August; 60(8): 3117-3121




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.