IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Igietseme, J U
Right arrow Articles by Rank, R G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Igietseme, J U
Right arrow Articles by Rank, R G

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, August 1994, p. 3528-3535, Vol. 62, No. 8
0019-9567/1994/$04.00+0     DOI:

research-article

An in vitro model for immune control of chlamydial growth in polarized epithelial cells.

J U Igietseme, P B Wyrick, D Goyeau, and R G Rank

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205.

ABSTRACT

A polarized epithelial culture system and chlamydia-specific T-cell lines and clones were employed to investigate the ability and mechanisms by which T cells control the growth of chlamydiae in epithelial cells. Monolayers of polarized mouse epithelial cells were infected with the Chlamydia trachomatis agent of mouse pneumonitis (MoPn) and then exposed to antigen-stimulated MoPn-specific T-cell lines and clones. The results revealed that in vivo-protective MoPn-specific T-cell lines and clone 2.14-0 were capable of inhibiting the growth of MoPn in polarized epithelial cells. In contrast, the nonprotective MoPn-specific T-cell clone 2.14-3, naive splenic T cells, and a control T-cell clone could not inhibit the growth of MoPn in epithelial cells. Transmission electron microscopic analysis of infected epithelial cells which were exposed to clone 2.14-0 confirmed the absence of an established infection, as deduced from the virtual absence of inclusions in the cells. Antigen-specific activation of clone 2.14-0 was required for the MoPn-inhibitory function, since the absence of antigenic stimulation or stimulation with a heterologous chlamydial agent did not result in MoPn growth inhibition. Activation of clone 2.14-0 resulted in acquisition of the capacity to inhibit growth of both homologous (MoPn) and heterologous chlamydial agents. Close interaction between epithelial cells and clone 2.14-0 was required for the MoPn-inhibitory action, because separation of the cell types by a filter with a pore size of 0.45, 3.0, or even 8.0 microns abrogated MoPn inhibition. Protective T cells may act at close range in the epithelium to control chlamydial growth, possibly involving short-range-acting cytokines. The ability of antigen-stimulated T-cell lines and clones to inhibit chlamydial growth in polarized epithelial cultures could be a useful method for identifying protective T-cell clones and antigenic peptide fragments containing protective epitopes.


Infection and Immunity, August 1994, p. 3528-3535, Vol. 62, No. 8
0019-9567/1994/$04.00+0     DOI:




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.