IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tzipori, S.
Right arrow Articles by Donohue-Rolfe, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tzipori, S.
Right arrow Articles by Donohue-Rolfe, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect. Immun., 09 1995, 3621-3627, Vol 63, No. 9
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

The role of the eaeA gene in diarrhea and neurological complications in a gnotobiotic piglet model of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection

S Tzipori, F Gunzer, MS Donnenberg, L de Montigny, JB Kaper and A Donohue-Rolfe
Division of Infectious Diseases, Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine, North Grafton, Massachusetts 01536, USA.

We reported previously that mutation of the chromosomal gene eaeA from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) serotype O157:H7 prevented bacterial attachment in vivo. Attachment was restored when the EHEC or enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) eaeA gene was introduced into the mutant on a plasmid. In this communication we have compared in gnotobiotic piglets the pathogenicities of wild-type O157:H7 strain 86- 24 and its eaeA mutant UMD619 with those of the two plasmid- complemented strains expressing IntiminO157 (EHEC) and IntiminO127 (EPEC). 86-24 colonized the surface and glandular epithelium of the large intestine and induced diarrhea, while UMD619 did not colonize any intestinal site and induced little or no diarrhea. Surprisingly, strain UMD619 expressing IntiminO127 behaved in pigs more like EPEC than EHEC strains; it colonized the distal half of the small intestine and the surface of the large intestine, inducing serious diarrhea. In contrast, strain UMD619 expressing IntiminO157 colonized the colon extremely poorly, inducing little or no diarrhea. While only the two strains causing extensive attachment--86-24 and UMD619 expressing IntiminO127-- induced diarrhea, neurological symptoms attributed to Shiga-like toxin II occurred equally in all four groups of animals. The intimate bacterial attachment and mucosal damage were not a prerequisite for Shiga-like toxin II translocation from the gut lumen into the circulation. IntiminO127 appears not only to facilitate intimate attachment to cells but also to influence the site of intestinal colonization and other characteristics of EPEC infection.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.