IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anantha, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Donnenberg, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anantha, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Donnenberg, M. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect. Immun., Jan 1998, 122-131, Vol 66, No. 1
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology

Role of BfpF, a member of the PilT family of putative nucleotide- binding proteins, in type IV pilus biogenesis and in interactions between enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and host cells

RP Anantha, KD Stone and MS Donnenberg
Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.

Adherence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) to epithelial cells is dependent on a type IV fimbria, termed the bundle-forming pilus (BFP). A cluster of 14 genes is required for expression of BFP. The eighth gene in the cluster, bfpF, encodes a putative nucleotide- binding protein which resembles the PilT protein of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. It has been proposed that PilT is required for the retraction of the P. aeruginosa pilus, which results in twitching motility. To test the role of BfpF in BFP function and EPEC pathogenesis, two different mutations were constructed in the bfpF gene, one in the cloned gene cluster in a laboratory E. coli strain and one in wild-type EPEC. Neither mutation affected prepilin synthesis, leader sequence processing, or pilus biogenesis. However, both mutations resulted in increased localized adherence. In addition, the EPEC bfpF mutant displayed increased aggregation. The EPEC bfpF mutant was not deficient in attaching and effacing activity or invasion capacity. These results suggest that BfpF decreases aggregation and adherence by EPEC but that subsequent steps in EPEC pathogenesis do not require this protein.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.