This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Cryz, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, D. N.
Right arrow Articles by Cryz, S. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, April 1999, p. 2030-2034, Vol. 67, No. 4
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Expanded Safety and Immunogenicity of a Bivalent, Oral, Attenuated Cholera Vaccine, CVD 103-HgR Plus CVD 111, in United States Military Personnel Stationed in Panama

David N. Taylor,1,* José L. Sanchez,2,dagger José M. Castro,3 Carlos Lebron,1 Carlos M. Parrado,3 David E. Johnson,4 Carol O. Tacket,5 Genevieve A. Losonsky,5 Steven S. Wasserman,5 Myron M. Levine,5 and Stanley J. Cryz6

U.S. Naval Medical Research Institute Detachment, Lima, Peru1; U.S. Army Medical Research Unit, Brazil2; USA MEDDAC3 and U.S. Southern Command,4 Panama; Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 212015; and Swiss Serum and Vaccine Institute, Berne, Switzerland6

Received 16 October 1998/Returned for modification 18 November 1998/Accepted 8 January 1999

To provide optimum protection against classical and El Tor biotypes of Vibrio cholerae O1, a single-dose, oral cholera vaccine was developed by combining two live, attenuated vaccine strains, CVD 103-HgR (classical, Inaba) and CVD 111 (El Tor, Ogawa). The vaccines were formulated in a double-chamber sachet; one chamber contained lyophilized bacteria, and the other contained buffer. A total of 170 partially-immune American soldiers stationed in Panama received one of the following five formulations: (a) CVD 103-HgR at 108 CFU plus CVD 111 at 107 CFU, (b) CVD 103-HgR at 108 CFU plus CVD 111 at 106 CFU, (c) CVD 103-HgR alone at 108 CFU, (d) CVD 111 alone at 107 CFU, or (e) inactivated Escherichia coli placebo. Among those who received CVD 111 at the high or low dose either alone or in combination with CVD 103-HgR, 8 of 103 had diarrhea, defined as three or more liquid stools. None of the 32 volunteers who received CVD 103-HgR alone or the 35 placebo recipients had diarrhea. CVD 111 was detected in the stools of 46% of the 103 volunteers who received it. About 65% of all persons who received CVD 103-HgR either alone or in combination had a fourfold rise in Inaba vibriocidal titers. The postvaccination geometric mean titers were comparable among groups, ranging from 450 to 550. Ogawa vibriocidal titers were about twice as high in persons who received CVD 111 as in those who received CVD 103-HgR alone (600 versus 300). The addition of CVD 111 improved the overall seroconversion rate and doubled the serum Ogawa vibriocidal titers, suggesting that the combination of an El Tor and a classical cholera strain is desirable. While CVD 111 was previously found to be well tolerated in semiimmune Peruvians, the adverse effects observed in this study indicate that this strain requires further attenuation before it can be safely used in nonimmune populations.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Enteric Infections, Division of Communicable Diseases and Immunology (DCD&I), Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, D.C. 20307-5100. Phone: 202-782-0639. Fax: 202-782-0748. E-mail: col_david_taylor{at}wrsmtp-ccmail.army.mil.

dagger Present address: U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion & Preventive Medicine, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010-5422.


Infection and Immunity, April 1999, p. 2030-2034, Vol. 67, No. 4
0019-9567/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Grabenstein, J. D., Pittman, P. R., Greenwood, J. T., Engler, R. J.M. (2006). Immunization to Protect the US Armed Forces: Heritage, Current Practice, and Prospects. Epidemiol Rev 28: 3-26 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dennehy, P. H. (2001). Active Immunization in the United States: Developments over the Past Decade. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 14: 872-908 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chiang, S. L., Mekalanos, J. J. (2000). Construction of a Vibrio cholerae Vaccine Candidate Using Transposon Delivery and FLP Recombinase-Mediated Excision. Infect. Immun. 68: 6391-6397 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sathyamoorthy, V., Hall, R. H., McCardell, B. A., Kothary, M. H., Ahn, S. J., Ratnayake, S. (2000). Purification and Characterization of a Cytotonic Protein Expressed In Vitro by the Live Cholera Vaccine Candidate CVD 103-HgR. Infect. Immun. 68: 6062-6065 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • MASTROENI, P, BOWE, F, CAHILL, R, SIMMONS, C, DOUGAN, G (1999). Vaccines against gut pathogens. Gut 45: 633-635 [Full Text]