This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nichols, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, J. W.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infection and Immunity, February 2002, p. 591-600, Vol. 70, No. 2
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0     DOI: 70.2.591-600.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Differences in Components at Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Reaction Sites in Mice Immunized with Either a Protective or a Nonprotective Immunogen of Cryptococcus neoformans

Kasie L. Nichols, Sean K. Bauman, Fredda B. Schafer, and Juneann W. Murphy*

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73190

Received 24 August 2001/ Returned for modification 11 October 2001/ Accepted 30 October 2001

Cell-mediated immunity is the major protective mechanism against Cryptococcus neoformans. Delayed swelling reactions, i.e., delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH), in response to an intradermal injection of specific antigen are used as a means of detecting a cell-mediated immune (CMI) response to the antigen. We have found previously that the presence of an anticryptococcal DTH response in mice is not always indicative of protection against a cryptococcal infection. Using one immunogen that induces a protective anticryptococcal CMI response and one that induces a nonprotective response, we have shown that mice immunized with the protective immunogen undergo a classical DTH response characterized by mononuclear cell and neutrophil infiltrates and the presence of gamma interferon and NO. In contrast, immunization with the nonprotective immunogen results in an influx of primarily neutrophils and production of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-{alpha}) at the DTH reaction site. Even when the anticryptococcal DTH response was augmented by blocking the down-regulator, CTLA-4 (CD152), on T cells in the mice given the nonprotective immunogen, the main leukocyte population infiltrating the DTH reaction site is the neutrophil. Although TNF-{alpha} is increased at the DTH reaction site in mice immunized with the nonprotective immunogen, it is unlikely that TNF-{alpha} activates the neutrophils, because the density of TNF receptors on the neutrophils is reduced below control levels. Uncoupling of DTH reactivity and protection has been demonstrated in other infectious-disease models; however, the mechanisms differ from our model. These findings stress the importance of defining the cascade of events occurring in response to various immunogens and establishing the relationships between protection and DTH reactions.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, P.O. Box 26901, BMSB 1053, Oklahoma City, OK 73190. Phone: (405) 271-3110. Fax: (405) 271-3117. E-mail: juneann-murphy{at}ouhsc.edu.

Editor: T. R. Kozel


Infection and Immunity, February 2002, p. 591-600, Vol. 70, No. 2
0019-9567/01/$04.00+0     DOI: 70.2.591-600.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lindell, D. M., Ballinger, M. N., McDonald, R. A., Toews, G. B., Huffnagle, G. B. (2006). Immunologic Homeostasis during Infection: Coexistence of Strong Pulmonary Cell-Mediated Immunity to Secondary Cryptococcus neoformans Infection While the Primary Infection Still Persists at Low Levels in the Lungs. J. Immunol. 177: 4652-4661 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kleinschek, M. A., Muller, U., Brodie, S. J., Stenzel, W., Kohler, G., Blumenschein, W. M., Straubinger, R. K., McClanahan, T., Kastelein, R. A., Alber, G. (2006). IL-23 Enhances the Inflammatory Cell Response in Cryptococcus neoformans Infection and Induces a Cytokine Pattern Distinct from IL-12. J. Immunol. 176: 1098-1106 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mansour, M. K., Yauch, L. E., Rottman, J. B., Levitz, S. M. (2004). Protective Efficacy of Antigenic Fractions in Mouse Models of Cryptococcosis. Infect. Immun. 72: 1746-1754 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Blackstock, R., Murphy, J. W. (2004). Role of Interleukin-4 in Resistance to Cryptococcus neoformans Infection. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio. 30: 109-117 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Bauman, S. K., Huffnagle, G. B., Murphy, J. W. (2003). Effects of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha on Dendritic Cell Accumulation in Lymph Nodes Draining the Immunization Site and the Impact on the Anticryptococcal Cell-Mediated Immune Response. Infect. Immun. 71: 68-74 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Huang, C., Nong, S.-h., Mansour, M. K., Specht, C. A., Levitz, S. M. (2002). Purification and Characterization of a Second Immunoreactive Mannoprotein from Cryptococcus neoformans That Stimulates T-Cell Responses. Infect. Immun. 70: 5485-5493 [Abstract] [Full Text]