IAI FigSearch
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
IAI Accepts, published online ahead of print on 26 February 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
IAI.01718-06v1
75/5/2307    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brissette, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lukehart, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brissette, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Lukehart, S. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Infect. Immun. doi:10.1128/IAI.01718-06
Copyright (c) 2007, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanisms of Decreased Susceptibility to {beta}-defensins by Treponema denticola

Catherine A. Brissette and Sheila A. Lukehart*

Departments of Pathobiology, Oral Biology, and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: lukehart{at}u.washington.edu.


   Abstract

Treponema denticola, a periodontal pathogen, is relatively resistant to human beta-defensins (h{beta}D), small cationic antimicrobial peptides produced by a number of cells, including the gingival epithelium. We have previously demonstrated, using two independent methods, that T. denticola proteases are not responsible for decreased vulnerability to defensins. In this study, we confirm that the major outer membrane protease, dentilisin, is not responsible for T. denticola insensitivity to defensins, and explore several other possible mechanisms including reduced binding to the bacterial surface and efflux pump activity. It has been suggested that some bacteria mask their surfaces with serum proteins. T. denticola grown in a serum-free medium did not demonstrate increased susceptibility to h{beta}D-2, suggesting that cloaking of the outer surface with host proteins is not involved in defensin resistance. Nonetheless, we demonstrate that T. denticola binds significantly less h{beta}D-2 and -3 as compared to susceptible organisms, suggesting that the unusual outer membrane composition of T. denticola may discourage cationic peptide binding. Efflux pumps have been shown to mediate resistance to antibiotics and cationic peptides in other bacteria and their role in T. denticola's relative resistance to {beta}-defensins was investigated. Three inhibitors of bacterial ATP-binding cassette (ABC) efflux pumps had no effect on T. denticola's susceptibility to h{beta}D-2 or -3. In contrast, a proton motive force inhibitor, CCCP, increased susceptibility of T. denticola to killing by h{beta}D-3, demonstrating a potential role for efflux pumps (other than ABC pumps) in resistance to that peptide. Our data suggest that the combination of decreased defensin binding and efflux of any peptide which enters the cytoplasm may explain T. denticola's relative resistance to human {beta}-defensins.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
J. Bacteriol. J. Virol. Eukaryot. Cell
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.