Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Immunology

Cellular Immunity in a Cutaneous Model of Cryptococcosis

Judith E. Domer, Frank L. Lyon, Juneann W. Murphy
Judith E. Domer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank L. Lyon
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juneann W. Murphy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The temporal development of cellular immune responses in mice inoculated cutaneously with viable Cryptococcus neoformans 145 was determined in vivo and in vitro by comparing several antigen preparations for their efficacy in the assays selected. Three antigens derived from C. neoformans 145, viz., a culture filtrate preparation (CneF-145), a membrane extract (B-HEX), and soluble cytoplasmic substances (SCS), were compared for their ability to detect delayed hypersensitivity (DH) in vivo in a footpad assay or to stimulate lymphocytes in vitro in a thymidine incorporation assay. DH to B-HEX could be demonstrated as early as 1 week after infection, whereas significant responses to SCS and CneF-145 were not regularly detected until 3 weeks after infection. Substantial reactions were observed to all three antigens up to 12 weeks, although they peaked at 2 to 3 weeks. Reactions to B-HEX and SCS were somewhat better than those to CneF. Differences in the efficacies of the three antigens were not obvious after the sixth week of infection, however. In vitro, lymph node cells from infected animals were stimulated significantly with all three antigens beginning at week 1. As with DH, however, responses to CneF-145 were usually less than those to SCS and B-HEX. In vitro lymphocyte responses waned after approximately 6 weeks, whereas DH responses were clearly positive through 12 weeks. In addition to the studies in infected animals, animals immunized with heat-killed cells of C. neoformans 145 or 184 were tested 6 to 8 days later for DH with CneF-145, CneF-184, or B-HEX derived from C. neoformans 145. The CneF-145 and CneF-184 were equally effective for detecting DH, regardless of the cryptococcal strain used for immunization. Likewise, the B-HEX detected equivalent responses in mice sensitized with each cryptococcal strain. Since all three antigens were soluble and easily extracted and since each elicited significant cellular immune responses in infected animals, further studies involving their specificity and the nature of their reactive components seems warranted as they may help evaluate immune responses in humans infected with this fungus.

FOOTNOTES

  • ↵† Present address: Delta Corrosion, Belle Chasse, LA 70131.

  • Copyright © 1983, American Society for Microbiology
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Cellular Immunity in a Cutaneous Model of Cryptococcosis
Judith E. Domer, Frank L. Lyon, Juneann W. Murphy
Infection and Immunity Jun 1983, 40 (3) 1052-1059; DOI:

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cellular Immunity in a Cutaneous Model of Cryptococcosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cellular Immunity in a Cutaneous Model of Cryptococcosis
Judith E. Domer, Frank L. Lyon, Juneann W. Murphy
Infection and Immunity Jun 1983, 40 (3) 1052-1059; DOI:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522