Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Letters to the Editor

Reflux in the Mouse Model of Urinary Tract Infection

James R. Johnson
James R. Johnson
Infectious Diseases (111F)
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.12.6063-6064.1998
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Two studies recently published in Infection and Immunity involved a mouse model of ascending urinary tract infection (UTI) (1, 6). The inoculation conditions used in both studies, i.e., 20 to 50 μl of bacterial suspension inoculated into the bladder, had been found in a previous study from the same laboratory to produce immediate vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in a substantial proportion of mice (2).

As recognized by these and other investigators, VUR should be avoided in the mouse model of UTI because it introduces bacteria directly into the upper urinary tract, thereby bypassing important proximal steps in pathogenesis (but in an uncontrolled fashion), and because it can cause hydrostatic injury to the renal parenchyma, thereby rendering the model unrepresentative of uncomplicated ascending UTI in humans (2, 3). The investigators’ previous study, in which VUR could be avoided only by reduction of the inoculum volume to 10 μl and inoculation into the urethra rather than the bladder (2), was cited for the methods used in the recent studies despite the use of larger volumes and inoculation into the bladder in the recent studies (1, 6).

High levels of kidney infection were observed in the recent studies (1, 6), whereas negligible levels were achieved in the investigators’ previous study with the same bacterial strain (strain 1677) when VUR-free inoculation conditions were used (2). This finding suggests that inoculation-induced VUR may have accounted for some or most of the kidney infections encountered in the recent studies, a possibility which calls into question the physiological relevance of the studies’ findings. Interpretation of results thus would be aided by knowledge of whether experiments were done to confirm that the inoculation conditions used did not induce immediate VUR. In addition, since others have documented that 25 to 50 μl can be inoculated into the mouse bladder without causing VUR (4, 5), whereas Hopkins et al. previously found this not to be the case (2), it would be of considerable value to current or future users of the mouse model to know what VUR-avoidance measures Hopkins et al. may have introduced since their previous study (2).

  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Hopkins W. J.,
    2. Gendron-Fitzpatrick A.,
    3. Balish E.,
    4. Uehling D. T.
    Time course and host responses to Escherichia coli urinary tract infection in genetically distinct mouse strains.Infect. Immun.66199827982802
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Hopkins W. J.,
    2. Hall J. A.,
    3. Conway B. P.,
    4. Uehling D. T.
    Induction of urinary tract infection by intraurethral inoculation with Escherichia coli: refining the murine model.J. Infect. Dis.1711995462465
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Johnson J. R.,
    2. Manivel J. C.
    Vesicoureteral reflux induces renal trauma in a mouse model of ascending, unobstructed pyelonephritis.J. Urol.145199113061311
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Johnson J. R.,
    2. Brown J. J.
    Defining inoculation conditions for the mouse model of ascending urinary tract infection that avoid immediate vesicoureteral reflux yet produce renal and bladder infection.J. Infect. Dis.1731996746749
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mobley H. L. T.,
    2. Jarvis K. G.,
    3. Elwood J. P.,
    4. Whittle D. I.,
    5. Lockatell C. V.,
    6. Rusell R. G.,
    7. Johnson D. E.,
    8. Donnenberg M. S.,
    9. Warren J. W.
    Isogenic P-fimbrial deletion mutants of pyelonephritogenic Escherichia coli: the role of αGal(1-4)βGal binding in virulence of a wild-type strain.Mol. Microbiol.101993143155
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Morin M. D.,
    2. Hopkins W. J.
    Treatment of mice with staphylococcal enterotoxin B enhances resolution of an induced Escherichia coli urinary tract infection and stimulates production of proinflammatory cytokines.Infect. Immun.66199824662470
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

AUTHORS’ REPLY

AUTHOR’S REPLY

My colleagues and I appreciate the observations and comments of Dr. Johnson regarding two recent articles on susceptibility and resistance of mice to an induced Escherichia coli urinary tract infection (UTI) (1-2, 1-3). Of particular interest were the inoculation procedures used in these studies and the effect of inoculation on development of kidney infections.

The objectives of the first study (1-1) were to demonstrate possible differences in the susceptibility and immune responses of different inbred mouse strains to an induced E. coli UTI. These experiments examined the UTI resolution patterns and host inflammatory and antibody-forming cell responses of 10 mouse strains inoculated with the same bacterial strain and were conducted over an extended period of time. During the course of these and other studies (1-3) of induced UTIs in mice, we examined the effects of inoculum volume and route on vesicoureteral reflux and induction of kidney infections. Our results indicated that large inoculum volumes delivered into the bladder increased the incidence of kidney infections. A majority of the 10 mouse strains in the susceptibility/host response study had been screened by using a 50-μl bladder inoculum prior to our examination of inoculation conditions. Consequently, the remaining mice were also inoculated with a 50-μl volume to maintain consistency. It is thus possible that kidney infections observed in some mouse strains could be attributed to inoculation-associated reflux. It is important to note, however, that even under these conditions, not all mouse strains developed kidney infections and there were differences in severity among strains both early and late in the course of infection. We also noted that inflammatory and splenic antibody-forming cell responses were positively correlated with kidney infection intensity and believe this would be the case regardless of how the kidney infections were induced.

The objective of the second study (4) was to examine the effect of superantigen exposure on the resolution of bladder infection and induction of cytokines. Mice in these experiments were inoculated with E. coli instilled into the bladder in a 20-μl volume. We did not evaluate kidney infections in these mice and, therefore, do not have information on infection intensities or cytokine production in the kidneys. The reported effects of staphylococcal enterotoxin B on bladder infection resolution and cytokine induction are not likely to be affected by inoculation conditions.

  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1-1.↵
    1. Hopkins W. J.,
    2. Gendron-Fitzpatrick A.,
    3. Balish E.,
    4. Uehling D. T.
    Time course and host responses to Escherichia coli urinary tract infection in genetically distinct mouse strains. Infect. Immun. 66 1998 2798 2802
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 1-2.↵
    1. Hopkins W. J.,
    2. Hall J. A.,
    3. Conway B. P.,
    4. Uehling D. T.
    Induction of urinary tract infection by intraurethral inoculation with Escherichia coli: refining the murine model. J. Infect. Dis. 171 1995 462 465
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 1-3.↵
    1. Morin M. D.,
    2. Hopkins W. J.
    Treatment of mice with staphylococcal enterotoxin B enhanced resolution of induced Escherichia coli urinary tract infection and stimulates production of proinflammatory cytokines. Infect. Immun. 66 1998 2466 2470
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Reflux in the Mouse Model of Urinary Tract Infection
James R. Johnson
Infection and Immunity Dec 1998, 66 (12) 6063-6064; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.12.6063-6064.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reflux in the Mouse Model of Urinary Tract Infection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Reflux in the Mouse Model of Urinary Tract Infection
James R. Johnson
Infection and Immunity Dec 1998, 66 (12) 6063-6064; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.12.6063-6064.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
    • AUTHOR’S REPLY
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Escherichia coli Infections
Urinary Tract Infections
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522