Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PATHOGENESIS

Occurrence of Virulence-Associated Properties inEnterobacter cloacae

Rogéria Keller, Margareth Z. Pedroso, Rosana Ritchmann, Rosa M. Silva
Rogéria Keller
Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia, e Parasitologia and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margareth Z. Pedroso
Departamento de Pediatria, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 04023-062 São Paulo, SP, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosana Ritchmann
Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, 04039-030 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosa M. Silva
Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia, e Parasitologia and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.2.645-649.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Enterobacter cloacae is not a primary human pathogen but has been considered to be an important cause of nosocomial infections. Even so, there are almost no reports on its ability to produce recognized virulence-associated properties. In this study, we show that most of the E. cloacae strains examined were resistant to serum bactericidal activity and were able to produce aerobactin and mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin, and all of them could adhere to and invade HEp-2 cells. Since E. cloacae is part of the normal intestinal floras of many individuals, we believe that infectious disease due to endogenous E. cloacae might be a result of both host predisposing factors and the bacterial virulence determinants that we have detected in this survey.

Enterobacter cloacae is part of the normal flora of the gastrointestinal tract of 40 to 80% of people and is widely distributed in the environment (15, 19, 39). Like most members of the familyEnterobacteriaceae, these organisms are capable of causing opportunistic infections in hospitalized or debilitated patients (18, 19). They were recognized as a minor cause of hospital infection in a survey published in 1981 (31). Since then, clinical awareness of the potential of E. cloacae strains to cause disease has been reflected in the increasing number of epidemiologic studies of these microorganisms showing that they could be a serious cause of nosocomial gram-negative bacteremia (9, 17-19, 23).

Many studies have demonstrated that the environment and personnel usually are not the source for most infections (8, 18, 19). In fact, it is accepted that these infections often arise from the patient’s endogenous microflora, particularly those of the gastrointestinal tract (17, 18).

E. cloacae has an intrinsic resistance to ampicillin and narrow-spectrum cephalosporins and exhibits a high frequency of mutation to resistance to expanded-spectrum and broad-spectrum cephalosporins (37, 41). These characteristics, associated with the frequent endogenous carriage of E. cloacae, may result in abnormally high levels of this organism in the bowels of hospitalized patients, especially those who have received cephalosporins (17, 18). Intestinal overgrowth of a given species, usually due to antibiotic therapy, may precede bacterial translocation to mesenteric lymph nodes or to the bloodstream (4, 5). Several authors have suggested that the mechanism of hospital infections caused by E. cloacae usually corresponds to endogenous translocation from the digestive tract (4, 5, 17, 18). This idea was proven to be true when in 1992 Lambert-Zechovsky et al. (26) reported for the first time results of molecular analysis strongly supporting the endogenous nature of systemic bacteremia and meningitis due to E. cloacae.

Enterobacteria involved in extraintestinal infections, (mainlyEscherichia coli) are known to possess virulence-associated characteristics that distinguish them from random fecal isolates. A number of studies have elucidated the epidemiology and significance of these virulence-associated properties, including somatic antigens, adhesins, serum resistance, and production of enterotoxins, colicins, siderophores, and hemolysin (reviewed in reference16). Moreover, penetration of the epithelial layer of the intestinal mucosa is a key virulence mechanism of several enteric pathogens, such as Salmonella, Shigella,Escherichia, and Yersinia species, which can be assayed in vitro with human epithelial cell lines, such as HEp-2 cells, an epidermoid carcinoma line derived from human larynx (2, 14, 27).

The fact that E. cloacae is still considered a typical commensal and that, so far, there has been no evidence to suggest that its clinical significance extends beyond opportunistic infections may explain why there are, with rare exceptions, no studies related to its ability to produce the virulence-associated properties mentioned above for other microorganisms. To provide an overview of this subject, we have studied 54 strains of E. cloacae isolated from various sources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.A total of 54 E. cloacaestrains were included in this study: 28 from clinical specimens (blood, urine, and secretions) from hospitalized patients, 5 from catheters, 2 from the scalp, and 19 from the feces of healthy volunteers. All of the strains had been isolated recently in the diagnostic laboratory of a Public Health Hospital or at the Discipline of Microbiology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. The strains were identified as recommended by Brenner (10).

Resistance to serum bactericidal activity.The resistance of the bacterial strains to serum bactericidal activity was tested by the turbidimetric assay performed in 96-well flat-bottom microplates (Corning, Inc., Corning, N.Y.) according to the methodology described by Pelkonen and Finne (33). Briefly, an overnight bacterial growth in Luria-Bertani broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) was diluted (1/100) in fresh medium and grown until the exponential phase. Bacterial cells were harvested and resuspended in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered-saline (PBS [pH 7.4]) at 4°C to a concentration of ∼107 cells/ml. Seventy-five microliters of each bacterial suspension was distributed in the microplate wells. An equal volume of a pool of sera prepared from blood obtained from healthy human volunteers was added to each well to achieve a final concentration of 50%. Each strain was tested in triplicate with both normal serum and heat-inactivated serum (56°C, 30 min). Microplates were incubated at 37°C, and the growth ability of each strain was assessed by measurement of the optical density at 620 nm (OD620) (Titertek-Multiskan MCC/340 MK-2; Flow Laboratories, Inc., McLean, Va.) for 3 h at 30-min intervals.E. coli K-12 strain 711 was used as the sensitive control. The strains were considered serum resistant when they were able to grow equally in both fresh serum (complement active) and heat-inactivated serum (complement inactive).

Aerobactin production.Aerobactin production was assayed by the method of Carbonetti and Williams (11). Briefly,E. coli indicator strain LG1522 cells (11) were grown to 5 × 107 bacteria/ml in 3 ml of M9 broth supplemented with 0.4% glucose, 50 μg of thiamine per ml, and 200 μM α,α′-dipyridyl (all from Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Mo.). Bacteria were pour plated (107 cells) on M9 agar medium. Testing strains grown in the same broth medium were spotted onto the indicator strain, and plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C. E. coli LG1315 (43) and K-12 strains were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

Hemagglutination activity.In general, the media and methods used to test hemagglutination were those described by Adegbola and Old (1). Bacteria were grown statically in 10 ml of nutrient broth (Difco) at 30 and 37°C and subcultured six times at 3-day intervals. The cultures were then centrifuged at 2,000 ×g for 15 min and concentrated by resuspension in 1 ml of saline (NaCl, 0.85% [wt/vol]) to approximately 5 × 109 cells/ml. Fresh chicken, guinea pig, horse, human (group O only), pig, sheep, and ox erythrocytes and tannic acid (Sigma)-treated ox erythrocytes were used at a concentration of 3% in saline. The tests were performed in glass slides by mixing equal volumes (30 μl) of erythrocytes and bacterial suspensions.

Interaction with HEp-2-cultured cells.The methods used were described by Maurelli et al. (30) with modifications. HEp-2 cells (∼4 × 105 cells) were grown over tissue culture coverslips in flat-bottom centrifuge tubes with 19-mm-diameter (Vidrolabor; Ind. e Com. de Vidros para Laboratórios, São Paulo, Brazil) containing Eagle’s modified minimal essential medium (DMEM) (Sigma) with 10% (vol/vol) fetal calf serum (FCS) (Cultilab, Campinas, SP, Brazil) for 48 h at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. After being washed with prewarmed PBS, the monolayer was infected with ∼108 bacteria (determined by OD and with a growth curve (OD660 × number of viable bacterial cells) from an overnight growth in tryptic soy broth (Difco), resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 2% FCS and 2%d-mannose (Sigma), and centrifuged in a swinging rotor at 600 × g for 10 min at room temperature. After an incubation period of 2 h at 37°C (infection period), the monolayer was washed with PBS and then further incubated in fresh DMEM–2% FCS–2% d-mannose for an additional 4 h (multiplication period). The monolayer was washed with PBS, and associated bacteria were released by treatment with 0.1% Triton X-100 (E. Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in PBS for 5 min at room temperature and then were quantitated by plate counting. The number of internalized bacteria was determined as described above, except that 100 μg of gentamicin (Sigma) per ml was added to kill the extracellular bacteria during the multiplication period. The results analyzed represent the mean value of triplicate assays.

To check for adherence pattern and bacterial internalization, the assays were performed as described above, except that eucaryotic cell monolayers were grown over tissue culture coverslips. At the end of the multiplication period, the monolayers were fixed with methanol, stained with Giemsa (E. Merck), and observed under a light microscope. For electron microscopy examination, the monolayers were washed in PBS and fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.05 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2) (Sigma). The cells were then gently scraped, washed in 9% sucrose (Sigma) in the same buffer, and prepared for transmission electron microscopy as described by Reynolds (34). Nonadherent and noninvasive laboratory strain E. coli HB101 and enteroinvasive E. coli strain O28ac 9/82 were used as controls.

Cytotoxic activity.Hemolytic activity was determined by the presence of a clear halo around bacterial colonies after overnight incubation at 37°C on blood agar base (Difco) with 5% sheep erythrocytes with or without 10 mM CaCl2 (6). The cytotoxic effect on HeLa cells was assayed as described by Gentry (20).

Colony hybridization assays.The search for DNA homology with adherence and invasion genes already described for enterobacteria was performed by colony hybridization according to the method described by Maas (29). The DNA probes used were labeled by nick translation (35) with [α-32P]dATP (Amersham International plc, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) and are listed below: aggregative adherence, 1,000-bp XbaI-SmaI fragment from plasmid pCVD432 (3); diffuse adherence, 350-bpPstI fragment from plasmid pSLM852 (7); attaching-effacing, 1,000-bp SalI-KpnI fragment from plasmid pCVD434 (22); and invasion, 2,500-bpHindIII fragment from plasmid pCVD419 (38).E. coli K-12 strains carrying the same plasmids used as the sources of the probe fragments and E. coli K-12 strains carrying plasmids pBR322 and pUC8 were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

RESULTS

Serum resistance, aerobactin production, and hemagglutination activity.As shown in Table 1, serum resistance (the ability of a bacterial strain to grow in a pool of sera not depleted of complement as well as in the absence of complement [achieved by heating]) was a typical feature of most E. cloacae strains in this study. Curiously, the only four sensitive strains were blood isolates. Aerobactin production was also a very common characteristic among the strains studied, mainly in those isolated from blood, secretions, and the scalp (Table 1). A summary of the hemagglutination abilities of the 54 strains is presented in Table1. All of the strains could agglutinate guinea pig erythrocytes in the absence of d-mannose (mannose-sensitive hemagglutination [MSHA]), except for two strains isolated from feces, which agglutinated only chicken or tannic acid-treated ox erythrocytes. In regard to the other erythrocyte species, the most frequently agglutinated were chicken (87.0%), horse and tannic acid-treated ox (72.2%), and human (68.5%). It is worth mentioning that about 65% of the strains were able to agglutinate erythrocytes of at least four different species. On the contrary, mannose-resistant hemagglutination (MRHA) was observed with only one strain, which was isolated from urine (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Detection of serum resistance, aerobactin production, and hemagglutination activity among E. cloacae isolates from different sources

Association with HEp-2 cells.All of the 54 E. cloacae strains were able to associate with HEp-2 cells in either a diffuse pattern or in clusters (Fig.1), regardless of the origin of the strain. Transmission electron microscopy revealed a very intimate contact between the bacterium and cell membrane or microvilli (Fig.2). Quantification of associated bacteria was performed by counting the CFU per milliliter, and the results are presented in Table 2. The values were higher than 106 CFU/ml for 88.9% (48 of 54) of the strains. Compared to the nonpathogenic E. coli strain HB101, the great majority of the strains showed a statistically higher efficiency of association with HEp-2 cells (P < 0.001 [compared by two-tailed Student’s t test]).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Association of E. cloacae with HEp-2 epithelial cells. Bacterial cells can be seen associated with the eucaryotic cell membrane in clusters (strain 05/91 [A]) or in a diffuse adherence pattern (strain 04/91 [B]). Magnification, ×1,000.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Transmission electron micrograph showing adherence ofE. cloacae to HEp-2 cells. Bacterial cells appear in close contact with the cell membrane and microvilli.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Association of E. cloacae with HEp-2 cells according to clinical source of isolate

Since gentamicin does not penetrate the eucaryotic cell membrane, it is accepted that the survival of HEp-2 cell-associated sensitive bacteria after gentamicin treatment means that they are internalized. According to this assumption, although with variable efficiency, all of the 44 gentamicin-sensitive E. cloacae strains tested were able to internalize into HEp-2 cells (Table 3). It is important to mention that feces isolates could be as invasive as blood isolates. It is worth mentioning that the percentage of associated bacteria that were internalized was usually very low: less than 2% (0.1 to 1.9%) for 23 strains, between 2 and 8.3% for 16 strains, and between 10.3 and 59.2% for 5 strains. On the other hand, high association counts were not always accompanied by high invasion counts. Electron microscopy of HEp-2 cells infected with E. cloacae confirmed its invasion ability (Fig.3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

HEp-2 cell invasion of E. cloacae according to clinical source of isolate

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Transmission electron micrograph showing E. cloacae inside the cytoplasm of HEp-2 cells. The arrow points to a bacterial cell enclosed by a membrane-bound vacuole.

Hemolytic activity, cytotoxin production, and hybridization with DNA probes.None of the 54 E. cloacae strains tested were hemolytic, produced cytotoxin in the biological assay, or hybridized with the adherence and invasion DNA probes used.

DISCUSSION

It seems likely that the patient’s own flora, particularly from the gastrointestinal tract, may be responsible for the nosocomial infections caused by E. cloacae in debilitated patients. Since the large intestine is a reservoir of possibly thousands of types of commensal bacteria, it would be reasonable to expect that those which are involved in endogenous extraintestinal infections are apparently more virulent than and possess virulence-associated characteristics that distinguish them from random fecal isolates.

The serum resistance presented by most of the E. cloacaestrains in this study is a common feature of a variety of other gram-negative bacteria that invade and survive in the human bloodstream (36, 40). As in the other examples, this finding suggests that serum resistance may be an important determinant of virulence inE. cloacae. The only four E. cloacae strains that we have found to be sensitive to complement-mediated killing were isolated from blood samples. This is not a controversial result, since it is already known that serum from some bacteremic patients may be ineffective in bactericidal assays utilizing the infecting, homologous organism, even though the strain is fully susceptible to serum from healthy individuals (36).

We have shown that E. cloacae is able to produce aerobactin. The production of this siderophore in one strain ofEnterobacter (Aerobacter) aerogenes(21) and one strain of E. cloacae (42) has already been reported. There are no other studies, to our knowledge, of the production of aerobactin in clinical isolates ofE. cloacae. Der Vartanian et al. (13) have suggested that aerobactin influences either the extent of bacterial translocation from the intestinal tract, the extent of bacterial multiplication in tissues following translocation, or both. Thus, aerobactin secretion in vivo could be an important step in the stages of the infection cycle during which intestine-populating opportunistic bacteria effectively colonize the gut, penetrate the mucous layer covering the intestinal villi, translocate out of intestinal lumen through the epithelial cells, and finally spread to organs within which they may survive.

The search for the production of hemagglutinins among the E. cloacae strains has demonstrated that all but one produced a mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin compatible with the presence of type 1 fimbriae. On the other hand, MRHA was not found, except for in one strain isolated from urine. These results are in agreement with those of Adegbola and Old (1), who found MSHA but not MRHA in most of the E. cloacae strains studied.

Using the HEp-2 cell-line as a model, it was verified that E. cloacae has the ability to adhere to and invade eucaryotic cells. There was no correlation between adherence and the presence of hemagglutinins, since the adhesion assays were carried out in the presence of 2% d-mannose, all of the strains were adherent, and all but one were only MSHA positive. Very recently, Livrelli et al. (28), studying the adherence of 14 E. cloacae clinical isolates to the human cell line Intestine 407, showed that 10 strains were weakly adherent, while 2 others (one involved in bloodstream infection) were strongly adherent. In agreement with our findings, Livrelli et al. have found no relationship between the adhesive pattern and the eventual production of specific fimbriae. Further studies will be carried out in order to determine the adhesin(s) involved in the interaction with HEp-2 cells. Our results have also shown that E. cloacae is in general much less invasive to HEp-2 cells than the enteroinvasive E. colistrain used as control. De Kort et al (12) demonstrated that a strain of E. cloacae isolated from a patient with septicemia was able to invade and survive within rabbit gut enterocytes in situ, although with much lower efficiency than that of an invasive strain of Salmonella typhimurium. We are not aware of any other reports of the ability of E. cloacae to invade eucaryotic cells either in vitro or in vivo.

The 54 strains analyzed in this study were unable to produce hemolysin or cytotoxin. Reports about the production of toxins by E. cloacae are very scarce. Recently, Paton and Paton (32) isolated a strain that produced Shiga-like toxin II-related cytotoxin from a patient with hemolytic-uremic syndrome. Klipstein and Engert (24, 25) have isolated strains capable of producing heat-stable and heat-labile enterotoxins from patients with tropical sprue. In our study, the production of enterotoxins was not evaluated, since none of the strains was isolated from patients with gastrointestinal disease.

Under normal conditions, E. cloacae is no more than a harmless gut commensal organism. However, in patients receiving antibiotic therapy, E. cloacae strains may be selected and may excessively grow in the gastrointestinal tract. This work has shown that E. cloacae strains, including those isolated from feces, possess some virulence properties recognized as important in the onset of extraintestinal infections. Since they have the ability to adhere to and invade eucaryotic cells, it is clear that they would have the possibility of becoming systemic after intestinal translocation. Once outside the gastrointestinal tract, they would take advantage of being serum resistant and being able to chelate iron to survive and spread within the host. There is no doubt about the opportunistic nature of E. cloacae infections, but the presence of specific virulence determinants may play a definitive role in allowing them to happen.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Tania A. T. Gomes for kindly providing the fragment DNA probes and to Mônica A. M. Vieira for technical assistance with the hybridization procedures. We also thank E. Freymuller from the Centro de Microscopia Eletrônica, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, for providing the conditions under which we could perform the electron microscopy analysis. We are especially grateful to Tania Mara I. Vaz from the Section of Bacteriology of Instituto Adolpho Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil, for confirming the biotyping of the strains. Finally, our special thanks goes to Lilian R. M. Marques for critical review of the manuscript.

This work was supported by Centro de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nı́vel Superior, CAPES.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 14 July 1997.
    • Returned for modification 23 September 1997.
    • Accepted 25 November 1997.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Adegbola R. A.,
    2. Old D. C.
    Fimbrial haemagglutinins in Enterobacter species. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129 1983 2175 2180
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Baldini M. M.,
    2. Nataro J. P.,
    3. Kaper J. B.
    Localization of a determinant for HEp-2 adherence by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 52 1986 334 336
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Baudry B.,
    2. Savarino S. J.,
    3. Vial P.,
    4. Kaper J. B.,
    5. Levine M. M.
    A sensitive and specific DNA probe to identify enteroaggregative Escherichia coli, a recently discovered diarrheal pathogen. J. Infect. Dis. 161 1990 1249 1251
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Berg R. D.
    Translocation of indigenous bacteria from the intestinal tract Human intestinal microflora in health and disease. Hentges D. J. 1983 333 351 Academic Press, Inc. New York, N.Y
  5. 5.↵
    1. Berg R. D.,
    2. Garlington A. W.
    Translocation of certain indigenous bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract to the mesenteric lymph nodes and other organs in a gnotobiotic mouse model. Infect. Immun. 23 1979 403 411
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Beutin L.
    The different hemolysins of Escherichia coli. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 180 1991 167 182
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Bilge S. S.,
    2. Clausen C. R.,
    3. Lau W.,
    4. Moseley S. L.
    Molecular characterization of a fimbrial adhesin, F1845, mediating diffuse adherence of diarrhea-associated Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells. J. Bacteriol. 171 1989 4281 4289
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Bingen E.,
    2. Denamur E.,
    3. Lambert-Zechovsky N.,
    4. Brahhimi N.,
    5. El Lakany M.,
    6. Elion J.
    Rapid genotyping shows the absence of cross-contamination in Enterobacter cloacae nosocomial infection. J. Hosp. Infect. 21 1992 95 101
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bodey G. P.,
    2. Elting L. S.,
    3. Rodriguez S.
    Bacteremia caused by Enterobacter: 15 years of experience in a cancer hospital. Rev. Infect. Dis. 13 1991 550 558
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Brenner D. J.
    The genus Enterobacter The prokaryotes. A handbook of habitats, isolation, and identification of bacteria Starr M. P., Stopl H., Trüper H. G., Ballows A., Schlegel H. G. II 1981 1173 1180 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Germany
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Carbonetti N. H.,
    2. Williams P. H.
    A cluster of five genes specifying the aerobactin iron uptake system of plasmid ColV-K30. Infect. Immun. 46 1984 7 12
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. De Kort G.,
    2. Bolton A.,
    3. Martin G.,
    4. Stephen J.,
    5. van de Klundert J. A. M.
    Invasion of rabbit ileal tissue by Enterobacter cloacae varies with the concentration of OmpX in the outer membrane. Infect. Immun. 62 1994 4722 4726
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Der Vartanian M.,
    2. Jaffeux B.,
    3. Contrepois M.,
    4. Chavarot M.,
    5. Girardeau J.-P.,
    6. Bertin Y.,
    7. Martin C.
    Role of aerobactin in systemic spread of an opportunistic strain of Escherichia coli from the intestinal tract of gnotobiotic lambs. Infect. Immun. 60 1992 2800 2807
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Donnenberg M. S.,
    2. Donohue-Rolfe A.,
    3. Keusch G. T.
    A comparison of HEp-2 cell invasion by enteropathogenic and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 57 1990 83 86
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Dudley D. J.,
    2. Guentzel M. N.,
    3. Ibarra M. J.,
    4. Moore B. E.,
    5. Sagik B. P.
    Enumeration of potentially pathogenic bacteria from sewage sludges. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 39 1980 118 126
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Eisenstein B. I.,
    2. Jones G. W.
    The spectrum of infections and pathogenic mechanisms of Escherichia coli. Adv. Intern. Med. 33 1988 231 252
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Falkiner F. R.
    Enterobacter in hospital. J. Hosp. Infect. 20 1992 137 140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Flynn D. M.,
    2. Weinstein R. A.,
    3. Nathan C.,
    4. Gaston M. A.,
    5. Kabins S. A.
    Patients’ endogenous flora as a source of “nosocomial” Enterobacter in cardiac surgery. J. Infect. Dis. 156 1987 363 368
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gaston M. A.
    Enterobacter: an emerging nosocomial pathogen. J. Hosp. Infect. 11 1988 197 208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gentry M. K.,
    2. Dalrymple J. M.
    Quantitative microtiter cytotoxicity assay for Shigella toxin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 12 1980 361 366
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gibson F.,
    2. Margrath D. I.
    The isolation and characterization of hydroxamic acid (aerobactin) formed by Aerobacter aerogenes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 192 1969 175 184
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jerse A. E.,
    2. Yu J.,
    3. Tall B. D.,
    4. Kaper J. B.
    A genetic locus of enteropathogenic E. coli necessary for the production of attaching and effacing lesions on tissue culture cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87 1990 7839 7843
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. John J. F. Jr.,
    2. Sharbaugh R. J.,
    3. Bannister E. R.
    Enterobacter cloacae: bacteremia, epidemiology, and antibiotic resistance. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4 1982 13 28
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Klipstein F. A.,
    2. Engert R. F.
    Partial purification and properties of Enterobacter cloacae heat-stable enterotoxin. Infect. Immun. 13 1976 1307 1314
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Klipstein F. A.,
    2. Engert R. F.
    Immunological interrelationships between cholera toxin and the heat-labile and heat-stable enterotoxins of coliform bacteria. Infect. Immun. 18 1977 110 117
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Lambert-Zechovsky N.,
    2. Bingen E.,
    3. Denamur E.,
    4. Brahimi N.,
    5. Brun P.,
    6. Mathieu H.,
    7. Elion J.
    Molecular analysis provides evidence for the endogenous origin of bacteremia and meningitis due to Enterobacter cloacae in an infant. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15 1992 30 32
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Lassen J.,
    2. Kapperud G.
    Serotype-related HEp-2 cell interaction of Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect. Immun. 52 1986 85 89
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Livrelli V.,
    2. De Champs C.,
    3. Di Martino P.,
    4. Darfeuille-Michaud A.,
    5. Forestier C.,
    6. Joly B.
    Adhesive properties and antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella,Enterobacter, and Serratia clinical isolates involved in nosocomial infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34 1996 1963 1969
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Maas R.
    An improved colony hybridization method with significantly increased sensitivity for detection of single genes. Plasmid 10 1983 296 298
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Maurelli A. T.,
    2. Blackmon B.,
    3. Curtiss R. III.
    Temperature-dependent expression of virulence genes in Shigella species. Infect. Immun. 43 1984 195 201
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    National Survey of Infection in Hospitals. 1981. The general distribution of infection. J. Hosp. Infect.2(Suppl.):13–17.
  32. 32.↵
    1. Paton A. W.,
    2. Paton J. C.
    Enterobacter cloacae producing a Shiga-like toxin II-related cytotoxin associated with a case of hemolytic-uremic syndrome. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34 1996 463 465
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Pelkonen S.,
    2. Finne J.
    A rapid turbidimetric assay for the study of serum sensitivity of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 42 1987 53 57
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    1. Reynolds E. S.
    The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell. Biol. 17 1963 208 212
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Rigby P. W. J.,
    2. Diekman M.,
    3. Rhodes C.,
    4. Berg P.
    Labeling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. J. Mol. Biol. 113 1977 237 251
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Roantree R. J.,
    2. Rantz L. A.
    A study of the relationship of the normal bactericidal activity of human serum to bacterial infection. J. Clin. Invest. 39 1960 72 81
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Sanders C. C.,
    2. Sanders W. E. Jr.
    Emergence of resistance during therapy with the newer β-lactam antibiotics: role of inducible β-lactamase and implications for the future. Rev. Infect. Dis. 5 1983 639 648
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Small P. L. C.,
    2. Falkow S.
    Development of a DNA probe for the virulence plasmid of Shigella spp. and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli Microbiology—1986. Leive L., Bonventre P. F., Morello T. A., Silver S. D., Wu H. C. 1986 121 124 American Society for Microbiology Washington, D.C
  39. 39.↵
    1. Sommers H. M.
    The indigenous microbiota of the human host The biologic and clinical basis of infectious diseases. Youmans G. P., Paterson P. Y., Sommers H. M. 1985 65 80 Saunders Philadelphia, Pa
  40. 40.↵
    1. Taylor P. W.
    Bactericidal and bacteriolytic activity of serum against gram-negative bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 47 1983 46 83
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Then R. L.
    Ability of newer beta-lactam antibiotics to induce beta-lactamase production in Enterobacter cloacae. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 6 1987 451 455
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    1. Van Tiel-Menkveld G. J.,
    2. Vervuurt J. M.,
    3. Oudega B.,
    4. de Graaf F. K.
    Siderophore production by Enterobacter cloacae and a common receptor protein for the uptake of aerobactin and cloacin DF13. J. Bacteriol. 150 1982 490 497
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 43.↵
    1. Williams P. H.,
    2. Warner P. J.
    ColV plasmid-mediated colicin V-independent iron uptake system of invasive strains of Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 29 1980 411 416
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Occurrence of Virulence-Associated Properties inEnterobacter cloacae
Rogéria Keller, Margareth Z. Pedroso, Rosana Ritchmann, Rosa M. Silva
Infection and Immunity Feb 1998, 66 (2) 645-649; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.2.645-649.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Occurrence of Virulence-Associated Properties inEnterobacter cloacae
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Occurrence of Virulence-Associated Properties inEnterobacter cloacae
Rogéria Keller, Margareth Z. Pedroso, Rosana Ritchmann, Rosa M. Silva
Infection and Immunity Feb 1998, 66 (2) 645-649; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.2.645-649.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Enterobacter cloacae

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522