Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PATHOGENESIS

Inoculum Composition and SalmonellaPathogenicity Island 1 Regulate M-Cell Invasion and Epithelial Destruction by Salmonella typhimurium

M. Ann Clark, Barry H. Hirst, Mark A. Jepson
M. Ann Clark
Department of Physiological Sciences, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barry H. Hirst
Department of Physiological Sciences, Medical School, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark A. Jepson
Cell Imaging Facility and Department of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TD, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.2.724-731.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

In the mouse model of Salmonella typhimurium infection, the specialized antigen-sampling intestinal M cells are the primary route of Salmonella invasion during the early stages of infection. Under certain experimental conditions, M-cell invasion is accompanied by M-cell destruction and loss of adjacent regions of the follicle-associated epithelium (FAE), although the conditions responsible for expression of the cytotoxic phenotype in a proportion of previous studies have not been defined. In the present study, we have demonstrated that the cytotoxic effect exerted by wild-typeS. typhimurium on mouse Peyer’s patch FAE is dependent on the inoculum composition. We have also demonstrated that the extent of FAE destruction correlates with the extent of M-cell invasion. Bacteria inoculated in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth induce extensive FAE loss and exhibit efficient M-cell invasion, whereas bacteria inoculated in phosphate-buffered saline fail to induce significant FAE disruption and invade M cells at significantly lower levels. Similarly, inoculation in LB significantly enhances invasion of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells by wild-type S. typhimurium. Mutants defective for expression of invA, a component of Salmonellapathogenicity island 1 which is vital for efficient invasion of cultured cells, fail to induce FAE destruction and, when inoculated in LB, are attenuated for M-cell invasion. Variation in invgene expression is, therefore, one possible mechanism by which inoculate composition may regulate the virulence of wild-type S. typhimurium. Our findings suggest that the composition of the gut luminal contents may be critical in determining the outcome of naturally acquired Salmonella infections and that both vaccine formulation and dietary status of vaccine recipients may significantly affect the efficacy and safety of liveSalmonella oral vaccine delivery systems.

Salmonella species are an important group of pathogens which infect a wide range of hosts to cause a variety of disease syndromes. One feature common to all of these disease syndromes is that following oral ingestion, the bacterium must penetrate the intestinal epithelial barrier prior to the initiation of disease. The mechanisms by which Salmonellainvade the intestinal epithelium are unclear, although in vitro studies have identified several genes which are required to optimize S. typhimurium invasion of epithelial cells. Many of these genes are located in Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI1), located at centisome 63 on the Salmonella typhimurium chromosome. These genes encode a type III protein secretion system together with several of its target proteins (for a review, see reference16). In vitro studies have demonstrated that invasion of cultured cells by Salmonella species is modulated by a variety of environmental and growth conditions, including oxygen tension, osmolarity, carbohydrate availability, and bacterial growth phase (13, 24, 27, 35-37). Environmental modulation of in vitro invasion is achieved by the regulation of SPI1-encoded invasion gene expression via a complex array of transcription factors (1, 2, 21, 25, 32) which are thought to ensure that invasion gene expression and consequently epithelial invasion by S. typhimurium are maximal under conditions present in the gut lumen.

The primary sites of Salmonella invasion in the host intestine are the ileal Peyer’s patches and possibly also the cecal lymphoid patches (4). The follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) which overlies these gut-associated lymphoid tissues includes the specialized antigen-sampling M cells which are a major site of invasion by a diverse range of pathogens (14, 19, 28). Recent studies suggest that M cells play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis ofS. typhimurium since, at least during the early stages of infection, these cells are the primary site of S. typhimurium invasion in the mouse intestine (7, 22). The role of the SPI1-encoded genes in M-cell invasion is unclear, although recently we have demonstrated that strains carrying mutations in the inv genes of SPI1 are severely attenuated for invasion of cultured cells but retain the capacity to invade mouse M cells (8).

The interaction of S. typhimurium with intestinal M cells induces the formation of prominent membrane protrusions termed membrane ruffles (7, 8, 22). In addition, under certain experimental conditions, wild-type strains of S. typhimurium induce M-cell destruction and extensive sloughing of adjacent areas of FAE (3, 10, 22, 31, 33). The factors regulating the cytotoxicity of S. typhimurium have not been identified, although it is notable that previous studies have used markedly different experimental protocols (3, 7, 8, 10, 22, 31, 33).

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the phenomenon of M-cell cytotoxicity is dependent on the composition of the S. typhimurium inoculate. In addition, we have investigated the role of the inv genetic locus in Salmonella-induced cytotoxicity. Our results demonstrate that inoculate composition determines the extent of both M-cell invasion and the capacity to induce epithelial disruption. While S. typhimurium invades M cells by both inv-dependent and inv-independent mechanisms, mutants defective for invA are unable to cause epithelial disruption and, under conditions which promote invasion and FAE destruction by the wild type, are attenuated for M-cell invasion. These findings suggest that variation in expression of SPI1-encoded invasion genes is one possible mechanism by which inoculate composition may regulate M-cell invasion and FAE destruction by wild-type S. typhimurium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture.Wild-type S. typhimurium strains IR715 and SR11 and mutant strain SB111 (an isogenic nonpolar invA mutant of SR11 [30]) were prepared as previously described (7, 8). Briefly, a single colony grown on Luria-Bertani (LB) agar was inoculated into 2 ml of LB broth and incubated with agitation at 37°C for 7 h. From this starter culture, 103 bacteria were inoculated into 5 ml of LB broth (in a 6-ml vial) and grown as a static culture overnight (16 h) at 37°C. Alternatively, to obtain stationary-phase bacteria grown under nutrient-limiting conditions, 103 bacteria were inoculated into 5 ml of LB broth in a 30-ml vial and shaken vigorously overnight at 37°C. To determine the effect of inoculum composition, the bacteria were then pelleted and resuspended three times in either the original LB growth broth, phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4 (PBS), or PBS supplemented with 0.14 M mannitol, 5 g of yeast extract per liter, or 10 g of tryptone per liter. In the remaining studies, bacteria were used directly in the LB growth broth, without pelleting and resuspension.

Mouse gut loop studies.Ligated jejunal/ileal Peyer’s patch-containing gut segments were created in anesthetized adult female BALB/c mice as described previously (7, 8) and infected with the bacterial (3 × 109 bacteria/ml) or control preparations. After an appropriate incubation period, the mice were culled by cervical dislocation and the gut loops were rapidly removed. Harvested tissues were pinned flat, mucosal surface uppermost, on cork boards, rinsed thoroughly in PBS, and fixed in either 2% glutaraldehyde (in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.3) at 4°C or methanol (−20°C) for at least 2 h. To facilitate subsequent examination of the FAE, villi were then microdissected away from the domes.

Glutaraldehyde-fixed tissues which had been infected, unless otherwise stated, for 60 min were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as described previously (6) and examined with a Cambridge S240 SEM. All tissues were examined blind, and the extent of FAE destruction on each dome was assigned a score of 0 to 4, where 0 denotes negligible damage (loss of <20 single cells or <4 small cell clusters), 1 denotes low levels of damage (loss of ≥20 single cells or ≥4 but <10 small cell clusters), 2 denotes moderate damage (loss of ≥10 small cell clusters or ≥5 large cell clusters), 3 denotes extensive damage (loss of ≥1/6 FAE), and 4 denotes very extensive damage (loss of ≥1/2 FAE), small and large cell clusters being defined as areas equivalent to >4 but <10 cells and ≥10 cells, respectively.

Methanol-fixed tissues infected for 15 min were processed for immunocytochemical localization of bacteria by staining with anti-Salmonella antibodies and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibodies (7). M cells were localized by immersion for 60 min in tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC)-conjugated Ulex europaeus agglutinin 1 (UEA1; 67 μg/ml; Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, United Kingdom), a marker of mouse Peyer’s patch M cells (6). The stained tissues were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) and examined with a Bio-Rad MRC-600 confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) equipped with a krypton-argon mixed-gas laser. S. typhimurium association with the FAE was quantified by analyzing the z series of confocal optical sections of randomly selected areas of FAE from four discrete predetermined peripheral regions of infected Peyer’s patch domes. M-cell-associated bacteria were classified as adhered or invaded, invaded bacteria being defined as those at least 2 μm below the strongly UEA1-stained M-cell surface. Areas where the FAE was obscured (e.g., by mucus) were excluded from analysis.

In vitro studies.The effect of inoculum composition on invasion of cultured epithelial cells by wild-type S. typhimurium was also examined. S. typhimurium IR715 was grown as described above and then pelleted and resuspended three times in fresh LB or PBS. After dilution in LB or PBS to a concentration of approximately 108/ml, the bacterial preparations were added to Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) strain I cells cultured on permeable supports (Anocell; 0.5 cm2; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) as described previously (20). After 15 min of incubation at 37°C, the cell monolayers were washed six times in PBS to remove nonadherent bacteria and transferred to PBS at 0°C to prevent further invasion. S. typhimurium adhesion and invasion was then quantified by differential immunocytochemical staining as described previously (20). Briefly, the monolayers were incubated sequentially (at 0°C) with goat anti-Salmonella antibodies and FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-goat immunoglobulin to label extracellular bacteria. After permeabilization in methanol, the monolayers were incubated with anti-Salmonella antibodies and TRITC-conjugated rabbit anti-goat immunoglobulin at room temperature to label extracellular and intracellular bacteria. Monolayers were then examined with a Leica DM RBE epifluorescence microscope. Counts of adherent (FITC-labeled) and total (TRITC-labeled) bacteria associated with the monolayers were made in 10 randomly selected fields (ca. 5,000 μm2 per field) and used to calculate both the numbers of adhered and invaded bacteria per unit area.

Statistical analyses.The extent of FAE destruction (as defined by dome score values) induced by alternative inocula was initially analyzed by a Kruskal-Wallis test, which revealed that FAE damage was significantly affected by the composition of the gut loop inoculum. Data obtained for pairs of alternative inocula were subsequently analyzed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison tests. Statistical analyses of S. typhimurium association (adhesion and invasion, as defined by CLSM) with FAE cells in vivo and MDCK cells in vitro were performed by Mann-Whitney U tests. For all statistical tests, P values of <0.05 were considered significant; for direct comparisons of alternative inocula, the data analyzed were obtained from experiments performed on the same day and using the same batch of mice.

RESULTS

Effect of inoculum composition. (i) FAE destruction.SEM examination of tissues infected for 60 min with wild-type S. typhimurium strain IR715 resuspended in PBS revealed the presence of M-cell-associated ruffles but little evidence of M-cell cytotoxicity or FAE loss (Fig. 1a and b). In contrast,S. typhimurium resuspended in the original LB growth broth induced extensive FAE damage (Fig. 1c to f) typically characterized by areas of cell loss which were surrounded by cells denuded of microvilli and associated with the presence of invading bacteria (Fig. 1e and f). The areas of cell loss varied in size from single cells (presumably M cells) and small cell clusters to large areas of FAE which were frequently scattered around the periphery of the domes, a location which corresponds to the sites of maximum M-cell expression (Fig. 1d). Very extensive areas of FAE representing over half of the dome surface were lost from a proportion (15% [16 of 109]) of infected domes (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

SEM images of mouse Peyer’s patch tissues infected for 60 min with wild-type S. typhimurium strain IR715 resuspended in PBS (a and b) or LB (c to f). (a and b) Bacteria in PBS fail to exert a cytotoxic effect. Shown are whole dome (a) and localized area of a dome surface (b), both with an intact FAE. M cells in panel b either display a normal microvillous morphology (M) or possess membrane ruffles (arrow). (c to f) Destruction of FAE by bacteria resuspended in LB. (c and d) Whole domes, with loss of extensive areas of FAE in panel c (arrows) and loss of localized, peripheral regions of FAE in panel d (arrows). (e) Localized region of FAE showing relatively unaffected areas interspersed by damaged regions (arrows). (f) High-power view of FAE, depicting an area of FAE loss (lower left), an intermediate zone of cells denuded of microvilli (arrows), and a relatively unaffected region (upper mid-right). Bacteria are visible in the damaged areas. Bars: a, c, and d, 100 μm; b and f, 10 μm; e, 20 μm.

The dome score values obtained by SEM examination of 13 Peyer’s patches from six mice infected with IR715 in LB and 12 Peyer’s patches from six mice infected with IR715 in PBS (mean dome scores = 2.2 and 0.7, respectively [Table 1]) were analyzed by Dunn’s multiple-comparison tests. These analyses revealed that inoculum composition significantly (P < 0.001) affects the capacity of S. typhimurium to exert a cytotoxic effect on mouse Peyer’s patch FAE following 60 min of incubation in gut loops. At this time point, bacteria in PBS induced minor damage to the FAE, as indicated by the mean dome score values (0.7 for bacteria in PBS and 0.1 for control PBS [Table 1]), although this damage was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). In contrast, bacteria in LB induced extensive FAE damage which was significantly greater (P < 0.001) than that associated with the control inoculum LB (mean dome scores = 2.2 and 0.04, respectively [Table 1]). Time course studies revealed that bacteria in LB fail to induce significant FAE destruction after only 15 min of incubation in mouse gut loops (mean dome score = 0.2) but that damage is significant (P < 0.001) after 30 min and becomes increasingly extensive after longer incubation periods (mean dome scores = 1.9, 2.2, and 3.2 after 30, 60, and 120 min of incubation, respectively). After 60 min of infection in LB, bacteria grown to stationary phase under nutrient-limiting conditions induced FAE damage comparable to that induced by bacteria grown under our standard protocol where bacteria were grown in static, closed tubes (mean dome scores = 3.2 and 3.0, respectively).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Effects of inoculum composition and the invAgene on FAE destruction by S. typhimurium after 60 min of infection of mouse Peyer’s patch gut loops

The induction of cytotoxicity by bacteria resuspended in the original LB growth broth was dependent on the simultaneous presence of bacteria and LB broth and was independent of inoculum components which had accumulated in the LB broth during prolonged bacterial growth, since FAE destruction was absent from tissues incubated with filtered bacterial growth broth (mean dome score = 0.1 [Table 1]) and bacteria resuspended in fresh LB induced FAE destruction comparable to that induced by bacteria resuspended in the original LB growth broth (mean dome scores = 1.9 and 2.2, respectively).Salmonella-induced cytotoxicity was also independent of the pelleting and resuspension of bacteria during inoculum preparation, since IR715 prepared with or without three phases of pelleting and resuspension in the original LB growth broth induced similar levels of FAE damage (mean dome scores = 2.2 and 2.1, respectively).

To determine whether the relatively high osmolarity of LB (424 mosmol/liter) relative to that of PBS (292 mosmol/liter) might be solely responsible for the observed effect of inoculum composition onSalmonella-induced cytotoxicity, bacteria were resuspended in PBS supplemented with 0.14 M mannitol (440 mosmol/liter) and incubated for 60 min in mouse gut loops. SEM examination of infected tissues revealed that raising the osmolarity of PBS failed to enhanceSalmonella-induced FAE cell cytotoxicity (mean dome score = 0.8, compared to 0.7 for bacteria in unsupplemented PBS [Table 1]). In contrast, supplementation of PBS with either yeast extract or tryptone at concentrations equivalent to those in LB was sufficient to increase Salmonella-induced FAE cell cytotoxicity (mean dome scores = 2.8 and 2.7, respectively [Table1]) to that observed following bacterial inoculation in LB, whereas FAE damage was absent from control tissues incubated with PBS supplemented with either yeast extract or tryptone (mean dome scores = 0, [Table 1]).

(ii) M-cell invasion.To determine whether S. typhimurium invasion of the FAE was also influenced by inoculate composition we examined tissues incubated with bacteria for only 15 min, since at this earlier time point, even bacteria suspended in LB failed to induce significant FAE cell damage, and quantification at later time points is of little value since invasion is obscured by the onset of Salmonella-induced cytotoxicity. Tissues dual stained to localize bacteria and M cells were examined by CLSM; as previously described (7, 8), in all tissues examined, the vast majority of FAE-associated bacteria were associated with the M cells. Our dual-staining technique permitted discrimination between M-cell-adherent and M-cell-invaded bacteria (Fig.2), since the M-cell marker UEA1 strongly stains the apical surface of M cells (Fig. 2a), and consequently the position of bacteria relative to the M-cell surface can be readily identified by examination of the z series of confocal optical sections. Localization of M-cell-internalized bacteria was further assisted by very much weaker, diffuse UEA1 staining of the M-cell cytoplasm (Fig.2c). Cumulated data from four Peyer’s patches infected with IR715 in LB (total area FAE = 2.5 × 105μm2) and five Peyer’s patches infected with IR715 in PBS (total area FAE = 2.4 × 105 μm2) revealed that S. typhimurium invasion of M cells was significantly greater (P < 0.05) when inoculated in LB (3.45 ± 1.35 bacteria per 1,000 μm2; mean ± standard error of the mean [SE]) than when inoculated in PBS (0.07 ± 0.06 bacteria per 1,000 μm2; mean ± SE), demonstrating that invasion of M cells is enhanced by exposure to LB. Inoculate composition had a less dramatic effect on bacterial adhesion, although S. typhimurium adherence to M cells was still significantly greater (P < 0.05) when inoculated in LB (9.68 ± 1.07 bacteria per 1,000 μm2; mean ± SE) than when inoculated in PBS (1.14 ± 0.12 bacteria per 1,000 μm2; mean ± SE). The observed increase in bacterial adherence (8-fold) associated with inoculation in LB may be a contributory factor to the increase in invasion (49-fold) but cannot be the sole factor involved.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

CLSM images of mouse Peyer’s patch FAE infected for 15 min with wild-type S. typhimurium strain IR715 suspended in LB and dually stained for M cells (a and c) and bacteria (b and d). (a and b) Surface views. Adhesion of three bacteria to the surface of an M-cell is accompanied by redistribution of M-cell surface UEA1 staining (a, arrow). (c and d) Images at 6-μm depth. A bacterium (d) has invaded an M cell (c, arrow); localization of bacteria within the M cell is facilitated by weak UEA1 staining of the M-cell cytoplasm. Bar = 5 μm.

(iii) Invasion of cultured epithelial cells.Following a 15-min infection with S. typhimurium IR715, invasion of MDCK cells was significantly greater (P < 0.0001) when the bacteria were inoculated in LB (2.14 ± 0.58 bacteria per 1,000 μm2; mean ± SE; n = 12) than in PBS (0.14 ± 0.05 bacteria per 1,000 μm2; mean ± SE; n = 12), demonstrating that inoculum composition has an effect in vitro similar to that observed in vivo. Inoculum composition had a much smaller effect on bacterial adhesion to MDCK cells, although adhesion was also significantly greater (P < 0.05) when bacteria were inoculated in LB (0.61 ± 0.12 bacteria per 1,000 μm2; mean ± SE; n = 12) than in PBS (0.22 ± 0.06 bacteria per 1,000 μm2; mean ± SE; n = 12). In common with the results obtained in vivo, the observed increase in bacterial adhesion (3-fold) can be only a minor contributory factor in the observed increase in bacterial invasion (15-fold) associated with inoculation in LB.

Effect of mutation in the invA gene. (i) FAE destruction.In common with IR715, infection of mouse gut loops for 60 min with the alternative wild-type strain SR11 suspended in PBS failed to induce FAE destruction (8), whereas infection with SR11 suspended in LB resulted in extensive FAE destruction (Fig. 3a and b) similar to that observed for IR715 (Fig. 1c to f). In contrast, while infection with the invAmutant SB111 induced M-cell ruffles, M-cell destruction and FAE loss were virtually absent (Fig. 3c and d) even after bacterial inoculation in LB. Statistical analyses of the dome score values obtained from 9 Peyer’s patches in three mice infected with SR11 and 15 Peyer’s patches in seven mice infected with SB111 (mean dome scores = 2.4 and 0.1, respectively [Table 1]) confirmed that, when bacteria are inoculated in LB, mutation in invA significantly (P < 0.001) attenuates Salmonella-induced FAE cell cytotoxicity. The invA mutant SB111 failed to induce FAE damage beyond that associated with the control inoculum LB (mean dome scores = 0.1 and 0.04, respectively [Table 1]), in contrast to the wild-type strain SR11, which induced significant FAE damage (P < 0.001).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

SEM images of mouse Peyer’s patch tissues infected for 60 min with wild-type S. typhimurium strain SR11 (a and b) or its isogenic invA mutant SB111 (c and d), both suspended in LB. (a and b) Destruction of FAE by SR11. (a) Whole dome, showing peripheral regions of destruction (arrows); (b) localized region of FAE, depicting an area of FAE destruction (arrows) characterized by cell loss, microvillous denudation and the presence of associated bacteria, and a relatively unaffected area of FAE (upper region). (c and d) The invA mutant SB111 fails to exert a cytotoxic effect. Shown are whole dome (c) and localized area of a dome surface, both with an intact FAE. In panel d, the FAE is composed of enterocytes, a goblet cell (G), and M cells displaying a normal microvillous morphology (M) or surface membrane ruffles (arrows). Bars: a and c, 100 μm; b and d, 10 μm.

(ii) M-cell invasion.CLSM analysis of dually stained FAE from seven Peyer’s patches infected for 15 min with SR11 (total area FAE = 8.4 × 105 μm2) and six Peyer’s patches infected with SB111 (total area FAE = 5.5 × 105 μm2) revealed that significantly more (P < 0.05) wild-type SR11 (1.73 ± 5.51 bacteria per 1,000 μm2; mean ± SE) than invAmutant SB111 (0.15 ± 0.07 bacteria per 1,000 μm2; mean ± SE) bacteria invaded M cells demonstrating that under these inoculum conditions, the invA mutation attenuates M-cell invasion. The invA mutation also induced a small, but not statistically significant, attenuation of M-cell adhesion (P = 0.0734), the level of M-cell adhesion by the parental wild-type strain SR11 being 4.10 ± 0.97 bacteria per 1,000 μm2 (mean ± SE) compared with 1.37 ± 0.42 bacteria per 1,000 μm2 (mean ± SE) for theinvA mutant SB111.

DISCUSSION

We have demonstrated that the capacity of wild-type strains ofS. typhimurium to induce M-cell damage and FAE disruption in the mouse gut loop model of infection is dependent on the inoculum composition. This observation accounts for the divergent results previously obtained following S. typhimurium infection of mouse gut loops. After a 60-min infection period, extensive FAE destruction is induced by bacteria suspended in bacterial growth broth (22, 31, 33) and is absent if the bacteria are suspended in PBS (7, 8, 10). The S. typhimurium-induced FAE damage observed by us in the present study and by others in previous studies (3, 22, 31, 33) was similar to the Peyer’s patch ulcerations induced by S. typhi in human typhoid fever (29), an observation which further validates the mouse model of S. typhimurium infection as a model of human typhoid. Interestingly, there is some evidence that S. typhi also induces M-cell destruction following incubation in mouse Peyer’s patch gut loops (23), although it is unclear whether this damage equates to the lesions associated with S. typhimuriuminfection (31).

Our results also demonstrate that in addition to regulating FAE destruction, inoculum composition determines the extent of M (and MDCK) cell invasion by S. typhimurium. Efficient M-cell invasion correlates with the induction of cytotoxicity, which suggests that M-cell invasion and Salmonella-induced cytotoxicity are closely related events. Daniels et al. (10) demonstrated that bacteria in PBS induce extensive FAE destruction only after prolonged incubation periods (180 min) in mouse gut loops. Together with our data, this observation suggests thatSalmonella-induced cytotoxicity is delayed by bacterial inoculation in PBS as a consequence of the observed decrease in bacterial invasion or, alternatively, that bacteria in PBS fail to express the destructive phenotype and require growth conditions present within the tissues to stimulate expression of the appropriate genes. Although we found no evidence in the present study that cytotoxicity and invasion are separately regulated, this possibility cannot be excluded, particularly since recent evidence suggests that M-cell destruction, but not invasion, is linked to expression ofslyA (10).

We have demonstrated that M-cell invasion can proceed via bothinv-dependent (this study) and inv-independent (reference 8 and this study) routes. In our previous study using bacteria suspended in PBS (8), the extents of invasion by wild-type and invA mutant strains appeared to be similar, although the possibility that the invA mutation can cause a small attenuation in invasion could not be excluded since quantification was impractical due to variable and relatively low numbers of bacteria which invaded under these inoculum conditions. In the present study, bacterial suspension in LB increased invasion by wild-type bacteria, thereby facilitating quantification, and we were able to demonstrate that under these alternative inoculum conditions,inv-dependent invasion is more efficient thaninv-independent invasion. Since it is now clear that when inoculated in LB, an intact invA gene is essential for efficient M-cell invasion, we must now qualify our previous observation that mutation in SPI1 has no apparent effect on M-cell invasion (8) to include only those bacteria inoculated in PBS.

In the present study, when inoculated in LB, the invA mutant was attenuated for M-cell invasion by ca. 12-fold, a figure which is less than that observed for this and other invA mutants in cultured cells (100- to 500-fold [8, 17]) but is consistent with the observations that invA mutants exhibit increased 50% lethal dose values and decreased Peyer’s patch colonization following oral inoculation of mice but still readily kill infected animals (17). Assuming that M-cell invasion is the major route of intestinal invasion by invA mutants (as indicated by our gut loop studies), the latter observation clearly demonstrates that the inv-independent route of M-cell invasion is of clinical significance. Since wild-type bacteria in PBS exhibited levels of M-cell invasion similar to those exhibited by theinvA mutant, we propose that the low levels of M-cell invasion associated with bacterial inoculation in PBS may similarly be sufficient to cause disease. This observation may be relevant to the real-life situation, since similarly low levels of bacterial invasion may occur in unhealthy individuals whose diet is largely restricted to fluids. Our observation that invasion by the inv-independent route is unaccompanied by FAE destruction is consistent with the failure of other groups to detect FAE destruction by invmutants (22, 33), although at this stage it is unclear whether failure of inv mutants to induce FAE destruction is solely a result of insufficient bacterial invasion, or whether SPI1-encoded proteins have an additional role in the destructive process. Some previous studies have failed to demonstrate M-cell invasion by SPI1 mutants (22, 33), a result which is inconsistent either with our observations (reference8 and this study) or the relatively modest increase in oral 50% lethal dose values associated with these mutations (17, 33). We suggest that given the uneven distribution of FAE-associated bacteria (7, 19), the low levels of M-cell invasion exhibited by SPI1 mutants which we have identified by CLSM examination of large areas of FAE may be overlooked in studies which have used transmission electron microscopy to examine relatively small samples of M cells.

The mechanisms by which bacterial inoculation in LB enhances invasion and FAE destruction by wild-type S. typhimurium are unclear. It is unlikely that the observed phenomena are a consequence of variations in media pH or oxygen tension, since LB and PBS have similar pH values and the bacterial inocula were prepared in identical fashions to eliminate variations in oxygen tension. Our experiments with high-osmolarity PBS also demonstrate that the effect of LB on S. typhimurium virulence is not solely a consequence of medium osmolarity. In combination with the observation that addition of either yeast extract or tryptone to PBS raises the levels ofSalmonella-induced FAE cell cytotoxicity to those associated with bacterial suspension in LB, these findings suggest that the observed increase in S. typhimurium virulence associated with bacterial inoculation in LB may be a consequence of components present in all these media. The possible effect of inoculate composition on Salmonella virulence could be mediated nonspecifically by effects on bacterial growth phase or by more subtle effects on the physiological status of the bacteria, although during our experiments we attempted to minimize the effects of variations in bacterial growth phase by using bacteria derived from overnight cultures at high concentration in the test inocula. In addition, we demonstrated that bacteria grown to stationary phase under nutrient-limiting conditions still readily induce FAE destruction when inoculated in LB. These data suggest that FAE invasion and destruction are regulated by one or more components of LB which are not exhausted by growth to stationary phase. Addition of tryptone or yeast extract to PBS had effects on FAE destruction similar to those of bacterial inoculation in LB, suggesting that amino acid supply may be critical to the destruction process. This proposal is consistent with the observation that Salmonella invasion in vitro is reduced by prolonged inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis, as is likely to occur in bacteria suspended in PBS (26). It is possible that enhanced motility of bacteria suspended in LB relative to those in PBS (unpublished observation) contributed to the increase in bacterial adhesion observed both in vitro and in vivo following inoculation in LB, although other factors may also have affected bacterial adherence. It is clear, however, that variations in bacterial adherence were not alone sufficient to account for the observed effects of inoculum composition on bacterial invasion, and additional factors must have contributed to the effect of inoculum composition on S. typhimurium virulence.

It is possible that inoculum composition modifies S. typhimurium virulence by regulating the expression ofSalmonella-encoded genes which control invasion and bacterium-induced FAE destruction. This hypothesis is consistent with previous studies which have demonstrated that in vitro expression of the SPI1-encoded invasion genes (including inv) and, consequently, S. typhimurium invasion of epithelial cell lines are regulated by a variety of environmental and growth conditions, including growth phase, oxygen tension, osmolarity, and pH, via a complex group of transcription factors (1, 2, 5, 18, 21, 25, 32). The complexity of this system is emphasized by the observation that invasion gene expression is regulated in a coordinate manner and is dramatically repressed if only a single factor is suboptimal (2). In this study, we have demonstrated that theinv genetic locus is essential both for efficient M-cell invasion when bacteria are suspended in LB and forSalmonella-induced FAE destruction. From these results, it is tempting to speculate that the observed increase in M-cell invasion and FAE destruction by wild-type S. typhimurium associated with inoculation in LB may be a consequence of enhanced invgene expression in this medium. It is clear that further studies are required to identify the medium components responsible for the observed effects of inoculum composition on Salmonella virulence and to characterize the mechanisms involved.

Our finding that S. typhimurium invasion and cytotoxicity are regulated by inoculum composition suggests that experiments designed to identify the genetic basis of Salmonellainvasion and epithelial destruction must be interpreted with caution, since both the inoculum composition and dietary intake of the experimental animals may affect the observed bacterial virulence. While our studies have so far been restricted to the mouse gut loop model of infection, intragastric infection of mice with wild-type S. typhimurium similarly results in M cell destruction and FAE loss (3, 10), and it may therefore be hypothesized that inoculum composition and the nutritional state of the animal also influence the outcome of orally acquired Salmonella infections. Since any FAE loss is likely to result in extensive invasion by this and other gut luminal microorganisms, our observations suggest that the composition of the gut luminal contents (which is in turn affected by the foodstuffs ingested) is crucial for determining the outcome of naturally acquired Salmonella infections. To further investigate the possible effects of dietary intake on the outcome ofSalmonella infection in the naturally infected host, future experiments should be based on conditions which more closely mimic the natural situation (i.e., oral infection of bacteria in feedstuffs or water) and the effects of inoculum size, feedstuff composition, and gastric and intestinal environments on Salmonella virulence in both healthy and diseased individuals should be determined. Interestingly, in addition to the clinical syndromes which may result from the acute stages of S. typhimurium-induced M-cell destruction and FAE loss, it has been proposed that uncontrolled penetration of microorganisms and nutritional macromolecules through damaged areas of intestinal epithelium may also result in chronic disease syndromes due to the excessive stimulation of antigen-presenting cells and activation of potentially damaging inflammatory reactions (9, 11). These pathogenic mechanisms may account for the observations that lymphoid follicle ulceration is an early feature of Crohn’s disease (15, 34) and that M-cell degeneration is present in a proportion of patients suffering from spondylarthropathy (9). The possible role of M-cell destruction in these disease processes awaits further investigation.

In recent years there has been much interest in the use of attenuatedSalmonella strains as carriers of heterologous antigens in oral vaccine delivery systems (reviewed in reference12). Our observations that inoculum composition significantly affects the virulence of S. typhimurium have important implications for the design of Salmonella-based vaccines, since they suggest that vaccine formulation and intestinal contents of the vaccine recipient may have significant effects on both vaccine efficacy and safety. Live Salmonella-based vaccines should clearly be designed such that intestinal epithelial invasion is sufficient to ensure effective immunization but that bacterial invasion occurs in the absence of significant damage to the FAE. Identification of the molecular mechanisms responsible for intestinal invasion and FAE destruction by Salmonella species must now be priority areas for research.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank A. J. Bäumler for providing S. typhimurium IR715 and J. E. Galán for providing strains SR11 and SB111. We also thank T. A. Booth, Biomedical Electron Microscopy Unit, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, for assistance with scanning electron microscopy.

This work was supported by Wellcome Trust Veterinary Research Fellowship 041573/Z/94/Z awarded to M.A.C. Additional support was supplied by Royal Society equipment grant 17996 to M.A.J. The School of Medical Sciences Cell Imaging Facility, University of Bristol, is supported by Medical Research Council Infrastructure Award G4500006.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 13 May 1997.
    • Returned for modification 19 June 1997.
    • Accepted 20 November 1997.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bajaj V.,
    2. Hwang C.,
    3. Lee C. A.
    hilA is a novel ompR/toxR family member that activates the expression of Salmonella typhimurium invasion genes. Mol. Microbiol. 18 1995 715 727
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bajaj V.,
    2. Lucas R. L.,
    3. Hwang C.,
    4. Lee C. A.
    Co-ordinate regulation of Salmonella typhimurium invasion genes by environmental and regulatory factors is mediated by control of hilA expression. Mol. Microbiol. 22 1996 703 714
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bäumler A. J.,
    2. Tsolis R. M.,
    3. Heffron F.
    The lpf fimbrial operon mediates adhesion of Salmonella typhimurium to murine Peyer’s patches. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93 1996 279 283
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Carter P. B.,
    2. Collins F. M.
    The route of enteric infection in normal mice. J. Exp. Med. 139 1974 1189 1203
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. 5.↵
    1. Clark C. G.,
    2. MacDonald L. A.,
    3. Ginocchio C. C.,
    4. Galán J. E.,
    5. Johnson R. P.
    Salmonella typhimurium InvA expression probed with a monoclonal antibody to the C-terminal peptide of InvA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 136 1996 263 268
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Clark M. A.,
    2. Jepson M. A.,
    3. Simmons N. L.,
    4. Booth T. A.,
    5. Hirst B. H.
    Differential expression of lectin binding sites defines mouse intestinal M cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 41 1993 1679 1687
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Clark M. A.,
    2. Jepson M. A.,
    3. Simmons N. L.,
    4. Hirst B. H.
    Preferential interaction of Salmonella typhimurium with mouse Peyer’s patch M cells. Res. Microbiol. 145 1994 543 552
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Clark M. A.,
    2. Reed K. A.,
    3. Lodge J.,
    4. Stephen J.,
    5. Hirst B. H.,
    6. Jepson M. A.
    Invasion of murine intestinal M cells by Salmonella typhimurium inv mutants severely deficient for invasion of cultured cells. Infect. Immun. 64 1996 4363 4368
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cuvelier C. A.,
    2. Quatacker J.,
    3. Mielants H.,
    4. DeVos M.,
    5. Veys E.,
    6. Roels H.
    M cells are damaged and increased in number in inflamed human ileal mucosa. Eur. J. Morphol. 31 1993 87 91
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Daniels J. J. D.,
    2. Autenrieth I. B.,
    3. Ludwig A.,
    4. Goebel W.
    The gene slyA of Salmonella typhimurium is required for destruction of M cells and intracellular survival but not for invasion or colonization of the murine small intestine. Infect. Immun. 64 1996 5075 5084
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. DeVos M.,
    2. Cuvelier C.,
    3. Mielants H.,
    4. Veys E.,
    5. Barbier F.,
    6. Elewaut A.
    Ileocolonoscopy in seronegative spondylarthropathy. Gastroenterology 96 1989 339 344
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Dougan G.
    The molecular basis for the virulence of bacterial pathogens: implications for oral vaccine development. Microbiology 140 1994 215 224
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Ernst R. K.,
    2. Dombroski D. M.,
    3. Merrick J. M.
    Anaerobiosis, type 1 fimbriae, and growth phase are factors that affect invasion of HEp-2 cells by Salmonella typhimurium. Infect. Immun. 58 1990 2014 2016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Fujimura Y.,
    2. Owen R. L.
    M cells as portals of infection: clinical and pathophysiological aspects. Infect. Agents Dis. 5 1996 144 156
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fujimura Y.,
    2. Kamoi R.,
    3. Ida M.
    Pathogenesis of aphthoid ulcers in Crohn’s disease: correlative findings by magnifying colonoscopy, electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry. Gut 38 1996 724 732
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Galán J. E.
    Molecular genetic bases of Salmonella entry into host cells. Mol. Microbiol. 20 1996 263 271
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Galán J. E.,
    2. Curtiss R. III.
    Cloning and molecular characterization of genes whose products allow Salmonella typhimurium to penetrate tissue culture cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86 1989 6383 6387
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Galán J. E.,
    2. Curtiss R. III.
    Expression of Salmonella typhimurium genes required for invasion is regulated by changes in DNA supercoiling. Infect. Immun. 58 1990 1879 1885
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Giannasca P. J.,
    2. Neutra M. R.
    Interactions of microorganisms with intestinal M cells: mucosal invasion and induction of secretory immunity. Infect. Agents Dis. 2 1993 242 248
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Jepson M. A.,
    2. Lang T. F.,
    3. Reed K. A.,
    4. Simmons N. L.
    Evidence for a rapid, direct effect on epithelial monolayer integrity and transepithelial transport in response to Salmonella invasion. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 432 1996 225 233
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Johnston C.,
    2. Pegues D. A.,
    3. Hueck C. J.,
    4. Lee C. A.,
    5. Miller S. I.
    Transcriptional activation of Salmonella typhimurium invasion genes by a member of the phosphorylated response-regulator superfamily. Mol. Microbiol. 22 1996 715 727
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jones B. D.,
    2. Ghori N.,
    3. Falkow S.
    Salmonella typhimurium initiates murine infection by penetrating and destroying the specialized epithelial M cells of the Peyer’s patches. J. Exp. Med. 180 1994 15 23
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kohbata S.,
    2. Yokoyama H.,
    3. Yabuuchi E.
    Cytopathogenic effect of Salmonella typhi GIFU 10007 on M cells of murine ileal Peyer’s patches in ligated ileal loops: an ultrastructural study. Microbiol. Immunol. 30 1986 1225 1237
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Lee C. A.,
    2. Falkow S.
    The ability of Salmonella to enter mammalian cells is affected by bacterial growth state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87 1990 4304 4308
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Lee C. A.,
    2. Jones B. D.,
    3. Falkow S.
    Identification of a Salmonella typhimurium invasion locus by selection for hyperinvasive mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89 1992 1847 1851
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. MacBeth K. J.,
    2. Lee C. A.
    Prolonged inhibition of bacterial protein synthesis abolishes Salmonella invasion. Infect. Immun. 61 1993 1544 1546
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Mills S. D.,
    2. Finlay B. B.
    Comparison of Salmonella typhi and Salmonella typhimurium invasion, intracellular growth and localization in cultured human epithelial cells. Microb. Pathog. 17 1994 409 423
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Neutra M. R.,
    2. Pringault E.,
    3. Kraehenbuhl J.-P.
    Antigen sampling across epithelial barriers and induction of mucosal immune responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14 1996 275 300
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Owen R. L.
    M cells—entryways of opportunity for enteropathogens. J. Exp. Med. 180 1994 7 9 (Commentary.)
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Pace J.,
    2. Hayman M. J.,
    3. Galán J. E.
    Signal transduction and invasion of epithelial cells by S. typhimurium. Cell 72 1993 505 514
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Pascopella L.,
    2. Raupach B.,
    3. Ghori N.,
    4. Monack D.,
    5. Falkow S.,
    6. Small P. L. C.
    Host restriction phenotypes of Salmonella typhi and Salmonella gallinarum. Infect. Immun. 63 1995 4329 4335
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Pegues D. A.,
    2. Hantman M. J.,
    3. Behlau I.,
    4. Miller S. I.
    PhoP/PhoQ transcriptional repression of Salmonella typhimurium invasion genes: evidence for a role in protein secretion. Mol. Microbiol. 17 1995 169 181
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Penheiter K. L.,
    2. Mathur N.,
    3. Giles D.,
    4. Fahlen T.,
    5. Jones B. D.
    Non-invasive Salmonella typhimurium mutants are avirulent because of an inability to enter and destroy M cells of ileal Peyer’s patches. Mol. Microbiol. 24 1997 697 709
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.↵
    1. Rickert R. R.,
    2. Carter H. W.
    The “early” ulcerative lesion of Crohn’s disease: correlative light- and scanning electron-microscopic studies. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2 1980 11 19
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Schiemann D. A.
    Association with MDCK epithelial cells by Salmonella typhimurium is reduced during utilization of carbohydrates. Infect. Immun. 63 1995 1462 1467
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Schiemann D. A.,
    2. Schope S. R.
    Anaerobic growth of Salmonella typhimurium results in increased uptake by Henle 407 epithelial and mouse peritoneal cells in vitro and repression of a major outer membrane protein. Infect. Immun. 59 1991 437 440
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Tartera C.,
    2. Metcalf E. S.
    Osmolarity and growth phase overlap in regulation of Salmonella typhi adherence to and invasion of human intestinal cells. Infect. Immun. 61 1993 3084 3089
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Inoculum Composition and SalmonellaPathogenicity Island 1 Regulate M-Cell Invasion and Epithelial Destruction by Salmonella typhimurium
M. Ann Clark, Barry H. Hirst, Mark A. Jepson
Infection and Immunity Feb 1998, 66 (2) 724-731; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.2.724-731.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inoculum Composition and SalmonellaPathogenicity Island 1 Regulate M-Cell Invasion and Epithelial Destruction by Salmonella typhimurium
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Inoculum Composition and SalmonellaPathogenicity Island 1 Regulate M-Cell Invasion and Epithelial Destruction by Salmonella typhimurium
M. Ann Clark, Barry H. Hirst, Mark A. Jepson
Infection and Immunity Feb 1998, 66 (2) 724-731; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.2.724-731.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Peyer's Patches
Salmonella Typhimurium

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522