Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PATHOGENESIS

Identification of Virulence-Associated Characteristics in Clinical Isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica Lacking Classical Virulence Markers

Travis Grant, Vicki Bennett-Wood, Roy M. Robins-Browne
Travis Grant
Microbiological Research Unit, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Children’s Hospital, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vicki Bennett-Wood
Microbiological Research Unit, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Children’s Hospital, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roy M. Robins-Browne
Microbiological Research Unit, Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Royal Children’s Hospital, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.3.1113-1120.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Yersinia enterocolitica is an important enteric pathogen which has well-defined virulence determinants that allow the bacteria to become established in their hosts and overcome host defenses. A number of strains obtained from patients with diarrhea, however, lack these genes. Accordingly, the mechanisms by which they cause disease are uncertain. Most of these isolates belong to biotype 1A. Strains of this biotype are also frequently isolated from a variety of nonclinical sources, such as food, soil, water, and healthy animals, and there is evidence that some of these strains are avirulent. In this study we investigated 111 strains of Y. enterocoliticabiotype 1A, 79 from symptomatic humans and 32 from nonclinical sources, for virulence-associated characteristics. DNA hybridization studies showed that none of the strains carried sequences homologous with pYV, the ∼70-kb Yersinia virulence plasmid. Some strains hybridized with DNA probes for one of the following chromosomal virulence-associated genes: ail (7.2%), myfA(11.7%), ystA (0.9%), and ystB (85%). In addition, 33 strains (29.7%) produced an enterotoxin that was reactive in infant mice. However, the frequencies of these virulence-associated properties in clinical and nonclinical isolates were similar. Clinical isolates invaded HEp-2 cells and Chinese hamster ovary cells to a significantly greater extent than nonclinical strains (P ≤ 0.002). In addition, clinical strains colonized the intestinal tracts of perorally inoculated mice for significantly longer periods than nonclinical isolates (P ≤ 0.01). Light and electron microscopic examination of tissue culture cells incubated with invasive yersiniae revealed that the bacteria invaded selected cells in large numbers but spared others, suggesting that biotype-1A strains of Y. enterocolitica may invade cells by a novel mechanism. These results indicate that some clinical isolates of Y. enterocolitica which lack classical virulence markers may be able to cause disease via virulence mechanisms which differ from those previously characterized in enteropathogenic Yersiniaspecies.

Yersinia enterocoliticais an important human pathogen which causes a variety of disorders, ranging from nonspecific diarrhea to invasive disease such as mesenteric lymphadenitis, hepatosplenic abscesses, and septicemia (5, 10, 37). The heterogenous nature of Y. enterocolitica, including differences in virulence, has led to the division of the species into subgroups based upon biochemical behavior and lipopolysaccharide O antigens (5, 37). At present, six biotypes are recognized, of which biotype 1B and biotypes 2 through 5 are regarded as including primary pathogens (5, 22, 26, 37, 40). The primary pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica are recognized in part by their ability to invade tissue culture cells in large numbers (7, 27, 29, 35). Genes which contribute this ability include the inv andail genes on the bacterial chromosome and yadA, which is borne on a ca. 70-kb virulence plasmid known as pYV (4, 7, 27). Interestingly, however, other pYV-borne genes impede bacterial penetration of epithelial cells and macrophages, with the result that Y. enterocolitica is located extracellularly in infected animals (9, 15). Chromosomal genes other thaninv and ail which may also contribute to virulence include yst (also known as ystA), which encodes a heat-stable enterotoxin (YST-a), myf, which encodes the production of fibrillae (Myf), and the urease gene complex (11, 12, 21).

Biotype-1A strains of Y. enterocolitica, which generally are considered to be avirulent, are highly heterogenous, and include a large number of O serogroups (5, 37). They occur throughout the world in a wide range of environments and generally lack the genotypic and phenotypic markers associated with virulence of classical invasive strains of Y. enterocolitica, such as pYV,ail, myf, ystA, or a functionalinv gene (12, 21, 28, 35, 40, 41, 45). Moreover, biotype-1A strains of environmental origin do not colonize the gastrointestinal tracts of experimentally inoculated animals (33, 42, 48). Despite these observations, some biotype-1A strains have been implicated as a cause of gastrointestinal disease. For example, a nosocomial outbreak of gastroenteritis in Canada involving nine patients was attributed to a strain of Y. enterocoliticabiotype 1A, serogroup O:5 (36). In several countries, moreover, including Australia, Canada, The Netherlands, New Zealand, the Republic of Georgia, South Africa, Switzerland, and the United States of America, a significant proportion of Y. enterocolitica isolates obtained from patients with diarrhea belong to biotype 1A (3, 6, 17, 32, 34, 39, 46, 47). In addition, a prospective case control study with Chilean children showed that biotype-1A strains were significantly associated with diarrhea (30), and a clinical study in Switzerland demonstrated that the illness associated with biotype-1A strains of Y. enterocolitica was indistinguishable from that due to classical virulent biotypes (6).

If biotype-1A strains of Y. enterocolitica are able to cause disease, their pathogenic mechanisms are not clear because they lack the well-established virulence markers of primary pathogenic strains ofY. enterocolitica. Some Y. enterocolitica strains produce variants of YST-a, known as YST-b and YST-c (20, 52, 53), but their prevalence and contribution to disease are not known. In addition, a biotype-1A strain of serogroup O:6 was reported to produce a novel heat-stable enterotoxin, termed YST-II. This toxin differs from YST-a in a number of respects, including its mechanism of action, which does not appear to involve activation of guanylate cyclase (41). Other putative virulence determinants in this or other biotype-1A strains have not been investigated or reported.

As biotype-1A strains of Y. enterocolitica are so heterogenous and occupy such a diverse range of environmental niches, we hypothesized that there may be a subset of these bacteria which are capable of causing disease but which lack the classical virulence markers of Yersinia species and therefore cannot be identified by assays for these markers. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis by examining a collection of biotype-1A strains of clinical and nonclinical origins for virulence-associated determinants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacteria.One hundred eleven strains of Y. enterocolitica biotype 1A, isolated from diverse sources in widespread geographic areas, were provided by a number of investigators and selected from our culture collection to represent a variety of serogroups. Seventy-nine strains were obtained from the feces of humans who displayed symptoms consistent with intestinal yersiniosis. Twenty-four strains were of food or environmental origin; of these, 9 were from milk, 10 were from other foods (predominantly vegetables), 3 were from water, 1 was from soil, and 1 was from hay. Another eight strains were isolated from animals which did not exhibit any clinical evidence of infection. In this report, bacteria isolated from food or environmental sources and from healthy animals are collectively referred to as nonclinical strains, whereas isolates from symptomatic humans are designated clinical strains. All bacteria were maintained at −70°C in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, Hampshire, England) containing 30% glycerol. Before testing, their identity was confirmed as Y. enterocolitica biotype 1A by standard biochemical techniques (2, 51).

Two invasive strains of Y. enterocolitica, A2635 (biotype 1B, serogroup O:8) and W22703c (biotype 2, serogroup O:9), were used as controls (40). Both of these strains carry theinv, ail, and ystA genes. In addition, A2635 carries pYV, while W22703c does not. Y. enterocoliticaJP273 and YE2v, which carry mutations in the inv andail genes, respectively (27), were obtained from V. L. Miller, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo., who derived them from Y. enterocolitica 8081 (biotype 1B, serogroup O:8). pYV-cured derivatives of these strains, referred to as JP273c and YE2c, respectively, were obtained by passaging the bacteria three times on BHI agar containing 20 mM sodium oxalate and 20 mM MgCl2at 37°C (18). Escherichia coli HB101(pVM101) and E. coli HB101(pVM103), which express the invand ail genes of Y. enterocolitica, respectively, were also provided by V. L. Miller. For all studies, strains ofY. enterocolitica were grown on BHI agar or in BHI broth at 28°C, whereas E. coli strains were grown in the same media at 37°C.

DNA methods and plasmids.DNA extractions, restriction enzyme digestions, ligations, and transformations into E. coli were performed by standard techniques (1, 43). DNA probes for pYV, ail, inv, and ystAwere prepared and used to examine colony blots of the test bacteria at high stringency as described previously (40, 41). Oligonucleotide DNA probes for the ystB and ystCvariants of the ystA gene were designed to correspond to the variable regions of the respective genes. The ystB probe was 5′-ACTCAGACCCCATCGCCTTCAGAA-3′, corresponding to nucleotides 232 to 255 of the ystB gene (GenBank accession no. D88145 ), whereas the ystC probe was 5′-GTTGGTGATGTATCATCGTCAACAATAGCT-3′, corresponding to nucleotides 79 to 108 of the published sequence (20). Oligonucleotide probes were end labeled with [γ-32P]dATP (DuPont, New York, N.Y.) by using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). A DNA probe formyfA was prepared by PCR amplification of a 280-bp fragment of myfA from strain W22703c using the primers and conditions described previously (21). The resultant fragment was cloned into the SmaI site of pBluescript (SK−; Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) to create the plasmid pMyf2. Sequence analysis confirmed that pMyf2 contained the PCR product derived frommyfA. The myfA gene probe was then prepared by digesting pMyf2 with EcoRV and BamHI, purifying the 280-bp fragment, and labeling it with [α-32P]dATP (DuPont) by random priming (16). The ymoA gene was sought in 20 biotype-1A isolates (10 clinical and 10 nonclinical) by performing PCR on 1 μl of an overnight culture of each test strain that had been resuspended in distilled water and boiled for 5 min. DNA was amplified by using AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Roche, Branchburg, N.J.) and primers ymoA-C (5′-GACTTTTCTCAGGGGAATAC-3′) and ymoA-D (5′-GCTCAACGTTGTGTGTCT-3′) under the following conditions: 94°C for 60 s (melting), 50°C for 60 s (annealing), and 72°C for 60 s (extension), repeated for 35 cycles.

Assay for mouse-reactive enterotoxin.The ability of bacteria to produce enterotoxin was assessed in infant mice as described previously (41). Briefly, bacteria were cultured with shaking in Trypticase soy broth (BBL, Cockeysville, Md.) containing 0.6% (wt/vol) yeast extract (Oxoid) at 28°C for 48 h. Bacterial cells were removed by centrifugation, and 0.1 ml of the supernatant was administered by gavage to 2- to 3-day-old BALB/c mice in groups of three. After 2 h, mice were killed and the mean ratio of intestinal weight to the remaining body weight was determined. Ratios greater than 0.09 were considered indicative of enterotoxin production.

Bacterial adhesion to and invasion of tissue culture cells.Quantitative assays of bacterial adhesion to and invasion of tissue culture cells were performed as described previously (38). Briefly, HEp-2 (human pharyngeal epithelial) cells were cultured until almost confluent in 24-mm-diameter plastic wells (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) containing minimal Eagle’s medium (MEM) supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated (at 56°C for 30 min) fetal calf serum (CSL, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) and 20 mM HEPES (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells were cultured in α-MEM containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mM glutamine, and 20 mM HEPES. Twenty million CFU of each test strain was incubated for 3 h with tissue culture cells, which were then washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove nonadherent bacteria. For the adhesion assay, cells were immediately lysed with 0.1% digitonin (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) and the number of cell-associated bacteria was determined on agar plates (38). For the invasion assay, cells were incubated for a further 90 min in tissue culture medium containing 100 μg of gentamicin/ml, after which the gentamicin was removed by two washes with PBS. Tissue culture cells were then lysed with digitonin, and the number of intracellular bacteria was determined as described above. In a modification of the above assay, designed to determine the extent to which bacteria replicated in tissue culture cells, medium containing 100 μg of gentamicin/ml was replaced with medium containing 10 μg of gentamicin/ml, after which the bacteria and tissue culture cells were incubated for a further 18 h. Tissue culture cells were then lysed with digitonin, and the bacteria were counted as described above.

Microscopic examination of bacterium-cell interactions.For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), HEp-2 or CHO cells were grown to approximately 80% confluency in 50-mm-diameter plastic petri dishes (Becton Dickinson, Plymouth, England), after which 108bacteria were incubated with the tissue culture cells for 3 h at 37°C. The cells were then washed three times with PBS to remove nonadherent bacteria and were fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 1 h. After further washing, the cell monolayer was scraped off with a rubber policeman. Cells were then centrifuged to form a pellet, which was postfixed in 2.5% osmium tetroxide for 1 h, dehydrated through a graded acetone series, and embedded in Epon-araldite epoxy resin. Thin sections were cut and stained with 10% uranyl acetate and 2.5% lead citrate before viewing under a Philips CM12 electron microscope at 60 kV.

For light microscopic examination, 2 × 107 CFU was incubated at 37°C for 3 h with HEp-2 or CHO cells cultured on glass coverslips (50). Nonadherent bacteria were removed by three washes with PBS, and the cells were fixed with 100% methanol for 10 min. Cells were then stained with Giemsa stain (BDH, Dorset, England) and viewed by light microscopy.

Colonization of mice with Y. enterocolitica.Six-week-old BALB/c mice were inoculated by gavage with 100 μl of a 10% solution of sodium bicarbonate, followed 30 min later by approximately 109 CFU of a test strain suspended in 200 μl of PBS. For each bacterial strain, three mice infected with the strain were killed by CO2 inhalation on days 2, 3, 4, 7, 10, 15, and 23 after inoculation. Portions of ileum, cecum, colon, mesenteric lymph node, liver, spleen, and femoral bone marrow were removed aseptically from each animal. Each sample was then weighed and diluted 1/10 (wt/vol) in PBS. The samples were then homogenized with a Polytron homogenizer (Kinematica, Lucerne, Switzerland), and the number of viable bacteria was determined on duplicate Yersiniaselective agar plates (CIN; Oxoid).

Statistical analysis.Data were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney test (two-tailed), the log-rank test, or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. A critical P value of 0.05 was used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Examination of biotype-1A strains for virulence-associated genes ofYersinia species.Although all 111 strains of Y. enterocolitica biotype 1A hybridized with the DNA probe prepared from the inv gene of Y. enterocolitica, thus confirming their identity as Yersinia species (40), no strain was recognized by probes prepared from pYV. Eight strains, four of human origin and four nonclinical isolates, were recognized by the probe for the ail gene (Table1). Six of these strains (two clinical and four nonclinical) showed weak hybridization compared to the positive control. The myfA probe hybridized with 13 strains, 11 of which were isolated from humans and 2 of which were nonclinical. Sequences homologous to ystA were detected in only one strain—a clinical isolate. By contrast, 95 (85.6%) strains were recognized by the ystB probe, 69 of which were clinical isolates, and 26 of which were nonclinical. No strain was recognized by the ystC probe. The differences in the frequency of carriage of virulence-associated genes by clinical and nonclinical isolates were not significant (Table 1). All 20 biotype-1A strains (10 clinical and 10 nonclinical) examined for ymoA by PCR yielded a product of the expected size and nucleotide sequence, suggesting that theymoA gene occurs in all Y. enterocolitica strains regardless of potential virulence.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Prevalence of virulence-associated genes ofY. enterocolitica and enterotoxin activity inY. enterocolitica strains of biotype 1A

Production of enterotoxin.In an earlier study, we showed that a clinical isolate of Y. enterocolitica biotype 1A produced a novel enterotoxin, which we termed YST-II (41). To determine if the ability to produce enterotoxin is a feature of clinical isolates of biotype-1A strains in general, we examined culture supernatants of Y. enterocolitica biotype-1A strains for enterotoxin(s) that was reactive in infant mice. Positive results were obtained with 20 of 79 clinical isolates and with 13 of 32 strains isolated from other sources (P = 0.17 by two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) (Table 1). Although none of these strains hybridized with the ystA or ystC gene probe, 27 (17 clinical and 10 nonclinical) hybridized with the ystBprobe, suggesting that YST-b may contribute to the enterotoxigenicity of these bacteria. Six enterotoxin-secreting strains (three clinical and three nonclinical) were not recognized by the probes forystA, ystB, or ystC, suggesting that these bacteria may produce an unidentified enterotoxin. Since YST-II has not been purified and the gene encoding its production has not been identified, we were unable to determine if the enterotoxigenicity of these bacteria was due to the presence of YST-II or to that of another, as yet uncharacterized, enterotoxin.

Adherence to and invasion of tissue culture cells.The ability of Y. enterocolitica to invade epithelial cells is an important correlate of virulence (28, 44). One reason that strains of biotype 1A are generally regarded as avirulent is that they invade tissue culture cells to a lesser extent than Y. enterocolitica strains of virulent biotypes (25, 44). In this study, we investigated biotype-1A strains of clinical and nonclinical origins to determine if they differed in terms of their ability to adhere to or invade cultured epithelial cells.

Thirty-seven strains, twenty-five of clinical origin and twelve from other sources, were examined in a quantitative assay of adherence to HEp-2 cells (38). Most strains in the two groups adhered in large numbers, and there was no significant difference between strains of clinical and nonclinical origins (P = 0.31 by two-tailed Mann-Whitney test) (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Abilities of clinical and nonclinical strains ofY. enterocolitica biotype 1A to adhere to (A) and invade (B) HEp-2 cells and to adhere to (C) and invade (D) CHO cells. Approximately 107 CFU was incubated with epithelial cells for 3 h before nonadherent bacteria were removed by three washes. To determine the number of adhesive bacteria, some epithelial cells were lysed and the cell-associated bacteria were enumerated. To determine the number of intracellular bacteria, other epithelial cells were incubated in fresh tissue culture medium containing 100 μg of gentamicin/ml for 90 min before epithelial cells were lysed and bacteria were enumerated. Data are expressed as percentages of the original inoculum and are means from at least two separate experiments using duplicate wells. In the box-and-whisker plots, the horizontal line within the box is the median value, the limits of the box are the 10th and 90th percentiles, and the whiskers are the 5th and 95th percentiles. The difference in adhesion between the two groups of isolates is not significant (P = 0.3 for HEp-2 cells and P = 0.14 for CHO cells by the Mann-Whitney test). The difference in invasion between the two groups of isolates is significant (P = 0.002 for HEp-2 cells andP < 0.001 for CHO cells).

Despite their high levels of adhesion, strains of biotype 1A invaded HEp-2 cells relatively poorly, with less than 0.05% of the original inoculum recovered (Fig. 1B). In contrast, the control strains, W22703c and 8081c, exhibited levels of invasion of 15 and 21% respectively. Interestingly, however, clinical isolates of biotype 1A penetrated HEp-2 cells to a significantly greater extent than nonclinical isolates (P = 0.002) (Fig. 1B). To determine if environmental factors influenced invasive capacity, we repeated the assay after growing the bacteria at 28 or 37°C, under aerobic or anaerobic conditions, and in MEM tissue culture medium, but none of these treatments significantly altered their invasive ability (data not shown). Consequently, we examined 10 clinical and 10 nonclinical isolates (the same strains investigated for the presence ofymoA) for their ability to invade CHO cells. The numbers of bacteria in the two groups of strains which adhered to CHO cells were similar (P = 0.14 by the Mann-Whitney test) (Fig. 1C) but approximately 50-fold less than the number which adhered to HEp-2 cells. Despite their relatively poor adherence, however, clinical isolates invaded CHO cells in numbers 10- to 100-fold greater than those which penetrated HEp-2 cells (Fig. 1D). The bacteria recovered from these cells ranged between 0.15 and 1.1% of the original inoculum for clinical strains and between 0.02 and 0.5% for nonclinical isolates (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1D). By comparison, the control strains, W22703c and 8081c, invaded CHO cells efficiently, with 21 and 29% of the original inoculum recovered, respectively (data not shown). Isolates which possessed sequences homologous to ailor myfA did not invade HEp-2 or CHO cells more efficiently than those which lacked these sequences (data not shown).

Microscopic examination of epithelial cells.The interaction of Y. enterocolitica biotype-1A strains with HEp-2 and CHO cells was investigated by TEM and by light microscopy. TEM examination of HEp-2 cells inoculated with 10 different biotype-1A strains revealed bacteria loosely associated with the tissue culture cells (data not shown). Although occasional bacteria were identified within some HEp-2 cells, cells containing more than two bacteria were rarely observed and the vast majority of cells were uninfected (data not shown). Light microscopic examination of these cells showed that the bacteria did not exhibit any characteristic pattern of adherence analogous to the diffuse, localized, or aggregative phenotypes of some strains of diarrheagenic E. coli (31).

TEM examination of CHO cells incubated with Y. enterocolitica 937 (biotype 1A, serogroup O:6) revealed that some cells contained 20 to 30 internalized bacteria, although most cells were not infected (Fig. 2A). The impression that the majority of cells were not infected was verified by examination of serial sections above and below that shown in Fig. 2A. Some intracellular bacteria appeared to be replicating. This suspicion was confirmed by quantitative culture of internalized bacteria in CHO cells which had been incubated for various times in medium containing gentamicin (Table 2). Gentamicin was used because it kills extracellular (but not internalized) bacteria and hence would prevent any bacteria which may have escaped from the tissue culture cells during the course of the assay from reentering these cells (19).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

TEM of CHO cells incubated for 3 h with representative strains of Y. enterocolitica: 937 (biotype 1A, invasive) (A), AM5 (biotype 1A, noninvasive) (B), and W22703c (biotype 2, invasive) (C). Findings similar to those illustrated in panels A and B were observed with eight other strains of Y. enterocolitica biotype 1A, five invasive and three noninvasive. Bar = 1 μm.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Effect of prolonged incubation on the number of internalized bacteria recovered from CHO cellsa

To determine if this pattern of invasion of CHO cells is a characteristic of other biotype 1A strains, three clinical isolates (Y. enterocolitica AC12 [serogroup O:6,30], T83 [serogroup O:5], and 61525 [serogroup O:6,30]) and the two most invasive nonclinical isolates, CIDC 2064 (potato [serogroup O:5]) and CIDC 7134 (hay [serogroup O:6,31]), were chosen for further investigation by TEM. The results of these studies showed that these bacteria invaded CHO cells in a manner similar to that of strain 937. By contrast, CHO cells infected with poorly invasive biotype-1A strains of nonclinical origin, including two milk isolates, Y. enterocolitica AM5 (serogroup O:6) (Fig. 2B) and Y. enterocolitica AM8 (serogroup O:13,15), and two water isolates, IP2222 (serogroup O:36) and Eco88 (serogroup O:29), revealed no more than two bacteria per cell, with the great majority of cells being uninfected.

The patterns of adhesion and invasion of biotype-1A Y. enterocolitica were compared with those of strains W22703c and 8081c, which bear classical chromosomally encoded virulence markers but were cured of pYV. Although both of these strains lack the plasmid-encoded adhesin YadA, they adhered strongly to and invaded CHO cells with a more even distribution than that observed with biotype-1A yersiniae (Fig. 2C). To determine if the difference in the patterns of adhesion and invasion between biotype-1A yersiniae and other biotypes was due to invasin or Ail, Y. enterocolitica JP273c (Inv−) and YE2c (Ail−) and E. coliHB101(pVM101) (Inv+) and HB101(pVM103) (Ail+) were investigated in the CHO cell assay and examined by TEM. These studies showed that the Y. enterocoliticamutants and E. coli strains all displayed a far more even distribution of host cells invaded than invasive strains of biotype 1A (data not shown). To confirm the observation that invasive strains of yersiniae biotype 1A invade only some CHO cells, we repeated the assay with CHO cells grown on glass coverslips. Light-microscopic examination of these cells confirmed that invasive strains of biotype 1A examined by TEM adhered to and/or invaded selected CHO cells, while sparing the majority (Fig. 3A). This pattern of adherence and invasion was not observed with poorly invasive strains of environmental origin (Fig. 3B) or with the control strain W22703c (serogroup O:9, biotype 2) (Fig. 3C).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

CHO cells incubated for 3 h with representative strains of Y. enterocolitica: 937 (biotype 1A, invasive) (A), AM5 (biotype 1A, noninvasive) (B), and W22703c (biotype 2, invasive) (C). Large numbers of strain 937 are associated with groups of five or more CHO cells, whereas only a few bacteria (arrows) of strain AM5 are associated with these cells. Strain W22703c demonstrates a more even pattern of association with the CHO cells. Findings similar to those illustrated in panels A and B were observed with eight other strains of Y. enterocolitica biotype 1A, five invasive and three noninvasive. Giemsa stain was used. Bar = 5 μm.

Colonization of mice by Y. enterocolitica biotype 1A.To investigate the ability of biotype-1A Y. enterocolitica to colonize the gastrointestinal tracts of mice, two clinical isolates, Y. enterocolitica 937 and 61525, and two which were not of clinical origin, Y. enterocolitica AM5 and IP2222, were administered perorally to adult BALB/c mice, which were then examined for the presence of the bacteria in the small and large intestines and in selected abdominal organs. The results showed that, compared with nonclinical strains, bacteria of clinical origin were detected for longer periods in the ileum (median, 5.5 versus 2.5 days; P = 0.003 by the log-rank test), cecum (7 versus 2 days; P = 0.01), and colon (10 versus 4 days;P = 0.003) in infected mice (Fig.4). None of the strains tested was detected in the liver, spleen, or bone marrow at any time after infection, although Y. enterocolitica 937 and the control strain, W22703c, were cultured from mesenteric lymph nodes on the 2nd and 3rd days, respectively (data not shown).

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Colonization of BALB/c mice by strains of Y. enterocolitica. Mice were inoculated by gavage with one of four strains of biotype-1A Y. enterocolitica, namely, clinical isolate 61525 (•) or 937 (▪) or nonclinical isolate IP2222 (○) or AM5 (□). Each point represents the mean CFU obtained from the ilea (A), ceca (B), or colons (C) of three mice at the times indicated after inoculation. The duration of colonization by clinical isolates in all three sites was significantly longer than that for the nonclinical strains (P ≤ 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Although biotype-1A Y. enterocolitica strains were once regarded as avirulent, the findings of several clinical and epidemiological studies suggest that these bacteria produce gastrointestinal symptoms similar to those caused by pYV-bearing strains of biotypes 1B and 2 through 5 (6, 30). Despite this evidence of pathogenicity, however, there are few reported studies of the pathogenic properties of biotype-1A yersiniae. The aim of this investigation was to identify virulence-associated markers of these bacteria.

To achieve this, we compared the virulence-associated characteristics of 79 biotype-1A isolates from symptomatic humans with those of 32 strains obtained from healthy animals, food, and the environment. The hypothesis underlying this approach was that biotype-1A strains ofY. enterocolitica may differ in pathogenicity, with clinical isolates more likely to display virulence-associated properties than bacteria obtained from other sources. In choosing the strains for this study, we took care to ensure that the bacteria came from a variety of sources and represented a wide range of serogroups.

In agreement with previous studies, we found that strains of biotype 1A did not carry pYV and possessed other classical Yersiniavirulence factors only infrequently (13, 40). A possible exception to this was YST-b, which was detected by DNA hybridization in 85% of clinical and nonclinical strains. However, the frequencies of YST-b in clinical and nonclinical isolates were similar (P > 0.2). Moreover, the role of this toxin in the pathogenicity of Y. enterocolitica in general is unproven.

Some strains possessed sequences homologous to ail andmyfA, which previously were considered to be restricted to highly invasive strains (21, 28, 40). The presence of these sequences was not associated with increased adhesion or invasion in vitro, however, suggesting that these genes may not be expressed in these bacteria, as is the case with inv (35, 40). The general lack of classical virulence genes in biotype-1A strains ofY. enterocolitica indicates clear differences between the virulence mechanisms of these bacteria and those of Y. enterocolitica strains of other biotypes.

The key novel finding of the present study was that biotype-1A strains of clinical origin invaded epithelial cells, especially CHO cells, in significantly greater numbers than bacteria obtained from other sources (Fig. 1). The finding that biotype-1A Y. enterocoliticainvaded CHO cells more efficiently than HEp-2 cells is reminiscent of invasion mediated by Ail (27), but there was no correlation between invasive capacity and the presence of ail-homologous sequences, suggesting that biotype-1A yersiniae penetrate cells by a novel mechanism. In keeping with published observations (25, 44), biotype-1A yersiniae invaded tissue culture cells, including CHO and other polarized epithelial-cell lines, such as CaCo-2 and T84 cells (data not shown), less efficiently than the plasmidless biotype-2 strain W22703c. However, as classical pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica carry pYV, the products of which impede bacterial invasion of epithelial cells, these bacteria remain extracellular in host tissues (9, 15). Thus, it is conceivable that in infected tissues, more biotype-1A yersiniae (which never carry pYV) are located intracellularly than are classical pathogenic strains. The finding that individual isolates in the clinical and nonclinical groups overlapped in terms of their invasive capacities was not surprising, given that some clinical isolates may be nonpathogens which were obtained from patients whose symptoms were attributable to another cause and that some strains isolated from nonclinical sources were pathogens, given that the source of such bacteria is likely to be food, milk, water, or domestic animals (37).

The mechanisms which strains of biotype 1A used to invade epithelial cells is not known. The observation that bacteria penetrated selected tissue culture cells within a monolayer, while sparing others, suggests that biotype-1A strains invade cells by a novel process. The alternative hypothesis that clinical strains replicated more rapidly within the cells they had penetrated than nonclinical strains was discounted by the demonstration that strains 937 and T83 (clinical) and strains AM5 and IP2222 (nonclinical), which exhibited two distinct patterns of invasion (Fig. 2 and 3), grew at comparable rates within CHO cells they had invaded (Table 2). Interestingly, however, all four biotype-1A strains replicated more efficiently in CHO cells than the highly invasive biotype-2 strain or the E. coli control (Table 2). This observation points to another feature of biotype-1A strains which could be explored as a means to elucidate their virulence mechanisms.

The tendency for bacteria to associate with selected cells could be due to the presence of specific receptors at certain phases of the cell cycle, as has been suggested for E. coli, Clostridium difficile, and Listeria monocytogenes (14, 23, 24, 49). It is possible that invasion is not a virulence determinant of these bacteria but simply an in vitro marker of virulent strains. However, the capacity of biotype-1A yersiniae to penetrate tissue culture cells corresponded with an ability to colonize the intestinal tracts of orally inoculated mice. These two properties are likely to be linked, because bacteria which penetrate the intestinal epithelium would persist in the intestinal tract for longer periods than less-invasive strains. Studies to examine the invasive capacity of biotype-1A strains in vivo are currently in progress.

We previously suggested that the ability of biotype-1A Y. enterocolitica to cause diarrhea may be linked to its ability to produce the heat-stable enterotoxin YST-II (41). In this study, however, we found that only some of the clinical isolates we studied produced a mouse-reactive enterotoxin and that the proportions of enterotoxigenic bacteria were similar among clinical and nonclinical isolates. Interpretation of these findings is complicated by the facts that Y. enterocolitica seems capable of producing a variety of mouse-reactive enterotoxins, including YST-a, YST-b, YST-c, and YST-II, and that carriage of a yst gene does not invariably correspond to the presence of the toxin in culture supernatants. This may be because the genes are not functional or because their expression is reduced in vitro, possibly by ymoA, which modulates expression of the ystA gene in classical pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica (8). The finding that six toxin-secreting strains did not hybridize with any of the probes for YST-a, YST-b, or YST-c, suggests that these bacteria may produce an alternative toxin(s), possibly YST-II. This matter should be clarified when a probe for YST-II becomes available.

In conclusion, we have shown that Y. enterocolitica strains of biotype 1A associated with disease are able to invade epithelial cells and to colonize the intestines of mice. The mechanism by which these bacteria cause diarrhea is uncertain but may be due to the production of enterotoxin or of other, as yet unknown, virulence determinants. Current work in our laboratory is directed towards identifying these determinants.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the many investigators who provided the strains that were the focus of this study, in particular S. Bell, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia; S. Fenwick, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand; J. G. Morris, Jr., and A. Sulakvelidze, University of Maryland, Baltimore; and G. Wauters, Catholic University of Louvain, Louvain, Belgium. We are also indebted to V. L. Miller for the gift of Y. enterocolitica JP273 and YE2v, and E. coli HB101(pVM101) and HB101(pVM103).

This work was supported in part by grants from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and the Royal Children’s Hospital Research Foundation.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 8 October 1997.
    • Returned for modification 23 November 1997.
    • Accepted 19 December 1997.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ausubel F. M.,
    2. Brent R.,
    3. Kingston R. E.,
    4. Moore D. D.,
    5. Seidman J. G.,
    6. Smith J. A.
    Current protocols in molecular biology. 1991 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, N.Y
  2. 2.↵
    1. Barrow G. I.,
    2. Feltham R. K. A.
    Cowan and Steel’s manual for the identification of medical bacteria 3rd ed. 1993 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, United Kingdom
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bissett M. L.,
    2. Powers C.,
    3. Abbott S. L.,
    4. Janda J. M.
    Epidemiologic investigations of Yersinia enterocolitica and related species: sources, frequency, and serogroup distribution. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28 1990 910 912
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bliska J. B.,
    2. Copass M. C.,
    3. Falkow S.
    The Yersinia pseudotuberculosis adhesin YadA mediates intimate bacterial attachment to and entry into HEp-2 cells. Infect. Immun. 61 1993 3914 3921
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bottone E. J.
    Yersinia enterocolitica: the charisma continues. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 10 1997 257 276
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Burnens A. P.,
    2. Frey A.,
    3. Nicolet J.
    Association between clinical presentation, biogroups and virulence attributes of Yersinia enterocolitica strains in human diarrhoeal disease. Epidemiol. Infect. 116 1996 27 34
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Cornelis G.,
    2. Laroche Y.,
    3. Balligand G.,
    4. Sory M.-P.,
    5. Wauters G.
    Yersinia enterocolitica, a primary model for bacterial invasiveness. Rev. Infect. Dis. 9 1987 64 87
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Cornelis G.,
    2. Sluiters C.,
    3. Delor I.,
    4. Geib D.,
    5. Kaninga K.,
    6. Lambert de Rouvroit C.,
    7. Sory M.-P.,
    8. Vanooteghem J.-C.,
    9. Michiels T.
    ymoA, a Yersinia enterocolitica chromosomal gene modulating the expression of virulence functions. Mol. Microbiol. 5 1991 1023 1034
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cornelis G. R.,
    2. Wolf-Watz H.
    The Yersinia Yop virulon: a bacterial system for subverting eukaryotic cells. Mol. Microbiol. 23 1997 861 867
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Cover T. L.,
    2. Aber R. C.
    Yersinia enterocolitica. N. Engl. J. Med. 321 1989 16 24
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. de Koning-Ward T. F.,
    2. Robins-Browne R. M.
    Contribution of urease to acid tolerance in Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect. Immun. 63 1995 3790 3795
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Delor I.,
    2. Cornelis G. R.
    Role of Yersinia enterocolitica YST toxin in experimental infection of young rabbits. Infect. Immun. 60 1992 4269 4277
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Delor I.,
    2. Kaeckenbeeck A.,
    3. Wauters G.,
    4. Cornelis G. R.
    Nucleotide sequence of yst, the Yersinia enterocolitica gene encoding the heat-stable enterotoxin, and prevalence of the gene among pathogenic and nonpathogenic yersiniae. Infect. Immun. 58 1990 2983 2988
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Eveillard M.,
    2. Fourel V.,
    3. Barc M. C.,
    4. Kernéis S.,
    5. Coconnier M.-H.,
    6. Karjalainen T.,
    7. Bourlioux P.,
    8. Servin A. L.
    Identification and characterization of adhesive factors of Clostridium difficile involved in adhesion to human colonic enterocyte-like Caco-2 and mucus-secreting HT29 cells in culture. Mol. Microbiol. 7 1993 371 381
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Fällman M.,
    2. Persson C.,
    3. Wolf-Watz H.
    Yersinia proteins that target host cell signalling pathways. J. Clin. Invest. 99 1997 1153 1157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Feinberg A. P.,
    2. Vogelstein B.
    Addendum. A technique for radiolabelling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity. Anal. Biochem. 137 1984 266 267
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Fenwick S. G.,
    2. McCarthy M. D.
    Yersinia enterocolitica is a common cause of gastroenteritis in Auckland. N. Z. Med. J. 108 1995 269 271
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Higuchi K.,
    2. Smith J. L.
    Studies on the nutrition and physiology of Pasteurella pestis. VI. A differential plating medium for the estimation of the mutation rate to avirulence. J. Bacteriol. 81 1961 605 608
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Homes B.,
    2. Quie P. G.,
    3. Windhorst W. B.
    Protection of phagocytized bacteria from the killing action of antibiotics. Nature (London) 210 1966 1131 1142
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Huang X.,
    2. Yoshino K.,
    3. Nakao H.,
    4. Takeda T.
    Nucleotide sequence of a gene encoding the novel Yersinia enterocolitica heat-stable enterotoxin that includes pro-region-like sequence in its mature toxin molecule. Microb. Pathog. 22 1997 89 97
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Iriarte M.,
    2. Vanooteghem J. C.,
    3. Delor I.,
    4. Diaz R.,
    5. Knutton S.,
    6. Cornelis G. R.
    The Myf fibrillae of Yersinia enterocolitica. Mol. Microbiol. 9 1993 507 520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Kandolo K.,
    2. Wauters G.
    Pyrazinamidase activity in Yersinia enterocolitica and related organisms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 21 1985 980 982
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Kerneis S.,
    2. Bilge S. S.,
    3. Fourel V.,
    4. Chauviere G.,
    5. Coconnier M.-H.,
    6. Servin A. L.
    Use of purified F1845 fimbrial adhesin to study localization and expression of receptors for diffusely adhering Escherichia coli during enterocytic differentiation of human colon carcinoma cell lines HT-29 and Caco-2 in culture. Infect. Immun. 59 1991 4013 4018
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kernéis S.,
    2. Chauvière G.,
    3. Darfeuille-Michaud A.,
    4. Aubel D.,
    5. Coconnier M.-H.,
    6. Joly B.,
    7. Servin A. L.
    Expression of receptors for enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli during enterocyte differentiation of human polarized intestinal epithelial cells in culture. Infect. Immun. 60 1992 2572 2580
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Lee W. H.,
    2. McGrath P. P.,
    3. Carter P. B.,
    4. Eide E. L.
    The ability of some Y. enterocolitica strains to invade HeLa cells. Can. J. Microbiol. 23 1977 1714 1722
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Miller I.,
    2. Maskell D.,
    3. Hormaeche C.,
    4. Johnson K.,
    5. Pickard D.,
    6. Dougan G.
    Isolation of orally attenuated Salmonella typhimurium following TnphoA mutagenesis. Infect. Immun. 57 1989 2758 2763
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Miller V. L.,
    2. Falkow S.
    Evidence for two genetic loci in Yersinia enterocolitica that can promote invasion of epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 56 1988 1242 1248
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Miller V. L.,
    2. Farmer J. J. III,
    3. Hill W. E.,
    4. Falkow S.
    The ail locus is found uniquely in Yersinia enterocolitica serotypes commonly associated with disease. Infect. Immun. 57 1989 121 131
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Miller V. L.,
    2. Finlay B. B.,
    3. Falkow S.
    Factors essential for the penetration of mammalian cells by Yersinia. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 138 1988 15 39
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Morris J. G. Jr.,
    2. Prado V.,
    3. Ferreccio C.,
    4. Robins-Browne R. M.,
    5. Bordun A.-M.,
    6. Cayazzo M.,
    7. Kay B. A.,
    8. Levine M. M.
    Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from two cohorts of young children in Santiago, Chile: incidence of and lack of correlation between illness and proposed virulence factors. J. Clin. Microbiol. 29 1991 2784 2788
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Nataro J. P.,
    2. Kaper J. B.,
    3. Robins-Browne R.,
    4. Prado V.,
    5. Vial P.,
    6. Levine M. M.
    Patterns of adherence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 6 1987 829 831
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Noble M. A.,
    2. Barteluk R. L.,
    3. Freeman H. J.,
    4. Subramaniam R.,
    5. Hudson J. B.
    Clinical significance of virulence-related assay of Yersinia species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25 1987 802 807
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Pai C.,
    2. Mors V.,
    3. Seemayer T.
    Experimental Y. enterocolitica enteritis in rabbits. Infect. Immun. 28 1980 238 244
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Pham J. N.,
    2. Bell S. M.,
    3. Lanzarone J. Y. M.
    Biotype and antibiotic sensitivity of 100 clinical isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 28 1991 13 18
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Pierson D. E.,
    2. Falkow S.
    Nonpathogenic isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica do not contain functional inv-homologous sequences. Infect. Immun. 58 1990 1059 1064
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Ratnam S.,
    2. Mercer E.,
    3. Picco B.,
    4. Parsons S.,
    5. Butler R.
    A nosocomial outbreak of diarrheal disease due to Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:5, biotype 1. J. Infect. Dis. 145 1982 242 247
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Robins-Browne R. M.
    Yersinia enterocolitica Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. Doyle M. P., Beuchat L. R., Montville T. J. 1997 192 215 American Society for Microbiology Washington, D.C
  38. 38.↵
    1. Robins-Browne R. M.,
    2. Bennett-Wood V.
    Quantitative assessment of the ability of Escherichia coli to invade cultured animal cells. Microb. Pathog. 12 1992 159 164
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Robins-Browne R. M.,
    2. Jacobs M. R.,
    3. Koornhof H. J.,
    4. Mauff A. C.
    Yersinia enterocolitica biotype 1 in South Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. 55 1979 1057 1060
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    1. Robins-Browne R. M.,
    2. Miliotis M. D.,
    3. Cianciosi S.,
    4. Miller V. L.,
    5. Falkow S.,
    6. Morris J. G. Jr.
    Evaluation of DNA colony hybridization and other techniques for detection of virulence in Yersinia species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27 1989 644 650
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Robins-Browne R. M.,
    2. Takeda T.,
    3. Fasano A.,
    4. Bordun A.-M.,
    5. Dohi S.,
    6. Kasuga H.,
    7. Fang G.,
    8. Prado V.,
    9. Guerrant R. L.,
    10. Morris J. G. Jr.
    Assessment of enterotoxin production by Yersinia enterocolitica and identification of a novel heat-stable enterotoxin produced by a noninvasive Y. enterocolitica strain isolated from clinical material. Infect. Immun. 61 1993 764 767
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Robins-Browne R. M.,
    2. Tzipori S.,
    3. Gonis G.,
    4. Hayes J.,
    5. Withers M.,
    6. Prpic J. K.
    The pathogenesis of Yersinia enterocolitica infection in gnotobiotic piglets. J. Med. Microbiol. 19 1985 297 308
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual 2nd ed. 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  44. 44.↵
    1. Schiemann D. A.,
    2. Devenish J. A.
    Relationship of HeLa cell infectivity to biochemical, serological, and virulence characteristics of Yersinia enterocolitica. Infect. Immun. 35 1982 497 506
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Shayegani M.,
    2. DeForge I.,
    3. McGlynn D. M.,
    4. Root T.
    Characteristics of Yersinia enterocolitica and related species isolated from human, animal, and environmental sources. J. Clin. Microbiol. 14 1981 304 312
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Stolk-Engelaar V. M. M.,
    2. Meis J. F. G. M.,
    3. Mulder J. A.,
    4. Loeffen F. L. A.,
    5. Hoogkamp-Korstanje J. A. A.
    In-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Yersinia enterocolitica isolates from stools of patients in The Netherlands from 1982-1991. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 36 1995 839 843
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 47.↵
    1. Sulakvelidze A.,
    2. Dalakishvili K.,
    3. Barry E.,
    4. Wauters G.,
    5. Robins-Browne R.,
    6. Imnadze P.,
    7. Morris J. G. Jr.
    Analysis of clinical and environmental Yersinia isolates in the Republic of Georgia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34 1996 2325 2327
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Une T.
    Studies on the pathogenicity of Y. enterocolitica. I. Experimental infection in rabbits. Microbiol. Immunol. 21 1977 349 363
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  49. 49.↵
    1. Velge P.,
    2. Bottreau E.,
    3. Kaeffer B.,
    4. Pardon P.
    Cell immortalization enhances Listeria monocytogenes invasion. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 183 1994 145 158
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Vial P. A.,
    2. Mathewson J. J.,
    3. Guers L.,
    4. Levine M. M.,
    5. DuPont H. L.
    Comparison of two assay methods for patterns of adherence to HEp-2 cells of Escherichia coli from patients with diarrhea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28 1990 882 885
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Wauters G.,
    2. Kandolo K.,
    3. Janssens M.
    Revised biogrouping scheme of Yersinia enterocolitica. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 9 1987 14 21
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. 52.↵
    1. Yoshino K.,
    2. Huang X.,
    3. Miyachi M.,
    4. Hong Y.-M.,
    5. Takao T.,
    6. Nakao H.,
    7. Takeda T.,
    8. Shimonishi Y.
    Amino acid sequence of a novel heat-stable enterotoxin produced by a yst gene-negative strain of Yersinia enterocolitica. Lett. Pept. Sci. 1 1994 95 105
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    1. Yoshino K.,
    2. Takao T.,
    3. Huang X.,
    4. Murata H.,
    5. Nakao H.,
    6. Takeda T.,
    7. Shimonishi Y.
    Characterization of a highly toxic, large molecular size heat-stable enterotoxin produced by a clinical isolate of Yersinia enterocolitica. FEBS Lett. 362 1995 319 322
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Identification of Virulence-Associated Characteristics in Clinical Isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica Lacking Classical Virulence Markers
Travis Grant, Vicki Bennett-Wood, Roy M. Robins-Browne
Infection and Immunity Mar 1998, 66 (3) 1113-1120; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.3.1113-1120.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of Virulence-Associated Characteristics in Clinical Isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica Lacking Classical Virulence Markers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identification of Virulence-Associated Characteristics in Clinical Isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica Lacking Classical Virulence Markers
Travis Grant, Vicki Bennett-Wood, Roy M. Robins-Browne
Infection and Immunity Mar 1998, 66 (3) 1113-1120; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.3.1113-1120.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Yersinia enterocolitica

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522