Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Fungal and Parasitic Infections

Production of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Inflammatory Mediators in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells after Invasion by Trichinella spiralis

Chris K. F. Li, Rashmi Seth, Trevor Gray, Roger Bayston, Yashwant R. Mahida, Derek Wakelin
Chris K. F. Li
Departments of Life Science,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rashmi Seth
Histopathology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trevor Gray
Histopathology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roger Bayston
Microbiology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yashwant R. Mahida
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Derek Wakelin
Departments of Life Science,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.5.2200-2206.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Epithelial cells are the first point of host contact for invasive intestinal pathogens and may initiate mucosal inflammatory responses via production of proinflammatory cytokines and mediators. The aim of the present study was to investigate in vitro the initial invasion of a parasitic nematode (Trichinella spiralis), to measure the early production of specific epithelial cytokines and inflammatory mediators after invasion, and to compare these responses with those to invasive bacteria. Monolayers of human colonic epithelial cell lines (HT29, T84, and Caco-2) were infected by T. spiralis orListeria monocytogenes. Bile-activated infective larvae ofT. spiralis invaded and migrated into the epithelial cell monolayers, leaving trails of dead cells. Transmission electron microscopy studies of damaged cells along the trail showed a progressive increase in size, disruption of cell membranes, loss or dilution of cytoplasmic proteins, and swelling of mitochondria and nuclei. However, no nuclear fragmentation was observed. With reverse transcription-PCR and an enzyme-linked oligonucleotide chemiluminescent assay, mRNA transcripts of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-8, and epithelial neutrophil-activating peptide 78 were shown to increase in epithelial cells invaded by T. spiralis or L. monocytogenes, but only L. monocytogenes elicited increased inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) mRNA. No increase in tumor necrosis factor alpha or transforming growth factor β mRNA was seen after T. spiralis invasion. Increased levels of IL-8 were also released from the basolateral surfaces of infected monolayers as detected by sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Induction and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in epithelial cells after nematode or bacterial invasion may initiate the acute inflammatory response of the small intestine. The upregulation of iNOS in bacterial infections may contribute to mucosal defense and may also be associated with subsequent cell death, whereas different mechanisms appear to operate after nematode invasion.

The response of the intestine to invasion by pathogens represents a complex interaction between nonspecific inflammatory mechanisms and immunologically specific adaptive events. Epithelial cells are the first site of entry for invasive intestinal pathogens and may provide early signals for the acute mucosal inflammatory response via the release of proinflammatory cytokines and inflammatory mediators. A number of studies have examined the process in vitro with human colonic epithelial cell lines. These have been shown to produce a wide range of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1α, IL-6, IL-8, GM-CSF, GRO-α, MCP-1, and TNF-α) in response to invasive microbial pathogens (Entamoeba histolytica, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella dublin, Shigella dysenteriae, and Yersinia enterocolitica) (8, 14). However, the patterns of epithelial cytokine response vary with the site of infection and type of pathogen (3, 14, 21).

Intestinal inflammation is mediated by proinflammatory cytokines and inflammatory mediators. NO is an important mediator and is also known to have antimicrobial activity (13). Excessive formation of NO by iNOS has been associated with cellular toxicity and tissue damage in experimental models of active intestinal inflammation (24). With immunoperoxidase staining, iNOS was localized in inflamed epithelium in ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and diverticulitis (27). Therefore, epithelial iNOS may be important in acute mucosal inflammatory responses after invasion by pathogens.

Recently, an in vitro model of epithelial invasion by intestinal nematodes has been developed (20). Analysis of epithelial invasion by these parasites may broaden our understanding of epithelial cytokine responses to invasion by pathogens.Trichinella spiralis is a human intestinal pathogen that is becoming increasingly prevalent in Europe and North America because of changes in dietary habits and consumption of ethnic food. It has been used as an experimental model to study mucosal and inflammatory responses in animals. T. spiralis initiates infection by penetrating the columnar epithelium of the small intestine. During the early stages of infection, the inflammatory response is characterized by infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages/monocytes in the lamina propria (18). However, during the later stages of infection mast cells increase in number both in the lamina propria and between epithelial cells (26). In the murine model, the mucosal inflammatory response, which mediates expulsion of adult worms from the small intestine, is T-cell dependent (32). Moreover, data from many studies have shown that protective T-cell responses against intestinal nematodes are dependent on T helper 2 cytokines (10). However, the inductive and regulatory mechanisms of mucosal inflammatory responses to invasion byT. spiralis are still largely unknown.

In this paper, we describe the epithelial responses to invasion by the nematode T. spiralis with a recently described in vitro model (20) and compare these to responses elicited by invasive bacteria. The invasion and migration into epithelial monolayers by infective larvae produced significant damage to cell membranes and organelles. Invasion by infective larvae or bacteria resulted in increases in mRNA transcripts of IL-1β, IL-8, and ENA-78, but only bacteria elicited increased iNOS mRNA levels. Expression and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in epithelial cells after microbial invasion may initiate the acute inflammatory response of the small intestine. The upregulation of iNOS mRNA in bacterial infections may be important in mucosal defense and subsequent cell death.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Abbreviations.The abbreviations used in this paper are as follows: DIG, digoxigenin; DMEM, Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; ELOCA, enzyme-linked oligonucleotide chemiluminescent assay; ENA-78, epithelial neutrophil-activating peptide 78; FCS, fetal calf serum; GM-CSF, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GRO, growth-related protein; IL, interleukin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; l-NAME,l-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester; MCP-1, monocyte chemotactic protein 1; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; RT, reverse transcription; TEM, transmission electron microscopy; TGF, transforming growth factor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.

Parasitological techniques.The intestinal parasitic nematode T. spiralis was maintained as described previously (34). Infective muscle larvae were isolated from CFLP mice infected at least 35 days earlier. The infected mice were killed, skinned, and eviscerated. The muscles containing the encysted larvae were finely minced and digested in 0.6% pepsin A (P-7000; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) and 1% HCl for 3 h at 37°C. The isolated infective larvae were washed several times with 0.8% NaCl and subsequently activated in 5 mg of porcine bile extract (Sigma B-8531) per ml in Hanks’ balanced salt solution (Gibco, Basel, Switzerland) for 1 h at 37°C.

Intestinal epithelial cell culture.Human colonic epithelial cell lines HT29, T84, and Caco-2 were obtained from the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures (Porton Down, United Kingdom) and grown to confluency in 60-mm2 culture dishes (Costar, High Wycombe, United Kingdom). HT29 cells (passage 180-5) were cultured in DMEM (Gibco) containing 10% FCS (Gibco), 2 mmol of glutamine (Sigma G-5763) per liter, 100 U of penicillin G per ml, and 0.1 mg of streptomycin (Sigma P-0906) per ml at 37°C and 5% CO2. T84 cells (passage 80-5) were grown similarly in 50% DMEM–50% Ham’s F-12 medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mmol of glutamine per liter, and antibiotics (as for HT29 cells). Caco-2 cells (passage 32-7) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 10 μg of human transferrin (Sigma T-8158) per ml, 2 mmol of glutamine per liter, and antibiotics (as for the above cell lines). Monolayers of HT29 and T84 cells were grown to confluency for the Trichinella invasion assay, and Caco-2 cells were used 3 weeks after confluency, by which time the cells were differentiated with dome regions and apical microvilli as well as sucrase isomaltase activity (determined by an assay from Sigma).

Trichinella invasion assay.TheTrichinella invasion assay was carried out as described previously, with some modifications (20). Briefly, bile-activated larvae were resuspended in 5 ml of 1.75% agar (Difco, East Molesey, United Kingdom) in the culture medium appropriate for each cell line at 45°C. The agar-larvae mixture was immediately overlaid on the epithelial monolayers at room temperature until the agar was solidified, and the culture dish was then incubated for 5 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. The choice of this time span, which gave significant changes in mRNA levels, was based on data from preliminary experiments carried out to optimize the protocol. After the agar was removed with a blunt needle, the epithelial cells were processed for light and electron microscopy and RNA extraction, as described below.

Bacterial infection experiments.Monolayers were also infected by L. monocytogenes to provide a positive control of pathogen invasion. After incubation with 107 CFU ofL. monocytogenes per ml for 1 h at 37°C, the cells were washed twice in culture medium to remove extracellular bacteria. The cells were then incubated with culture medium containing 50 μg of gentamicin (Sigma G-1397) per ml for 4 h at 37°C to kill the remaining extracellular bacteria. After a total of 5 h of infection, the cells were harvested for RNA extraction, as described below. The culture supernatants were filtered by a 0.22-μm-pore-size filter and stored at −20°C until use.

Light and electron microscopy.Changes in epithelial monolayers caused by Trichinella invasion were studied by light and electron microscopy. After incubation with infective larvae, the epithelial cells were stained with 0.5% trypan blue (Sigma T-6146) and examined with an Olympus CK2 inverted microscope. The ultrastructural changes in infected epithelial cells were studied by TEM. Epithelial monolayers on culture dishes were fixed in 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde (in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4) for 2 h. All samples were subsequently washed in PBS and postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h before dehydration in ethanol and embedding in Epon resin, according to standard procedures. Suitable areas for TEM were selected from 0.5 μm toluidine blue-stained sections. They were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate before being observed with a JEOL 1200 EX transmission electron microscope.

RT-PCR.RT-PCR was carried out as described previously (23). Briefly, total RNA was obtained by lysing of the cells in RNAzol B (Biogenesis Ltd., Poole, United Kingdom), extraction with chloroform, and precipitation with isopropanol. After being washed and dried, the RNA pellet was resuspended in 50 μl of diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated H2O. Random hexamer-primed RT was carried out with 200 U of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Gibco). Control tubes without reverse transcriptase were set up with half of the RNA from each sample. Primers and probes for ENA-78, GAPDH, IL-1β, IL-8, and iNOS were kindly designed by R. Seth and R. A. Robins (Immunology, QMC Nottingham), and the primers were synthesized in-house (Table 1). GAPDH was used as a reference marker to correct for any variation in procedure. Specific oligonucleotide probes to detect PCR products were synthesized and labelled with DIG by R&D Systems Europe Ltd. Reaction conditions are given in Table 1. PCR products were quantified by ELOCA with the labelled probes to identify PCR products after blotting onto nylon membranes. After incubation with rabbit anti-DIG antibody labelled with alkaline phosphatase (Boehringer Mannheim, Lewes, United Kingdom), the membranes were incubated with chemiluminescent substrate (CSP-Star; Boehringer Mannheim) and the photons emitted were measured by a microplate scintillation spectrophotometer. The signal for the cytokine PCR product was recorded as counts per second and expressed as a ratio of the counts per second for the GAPDH product. Expression of mRNA of IL-1β, IL-8, ENA-78, or iNOS in each sample was obtained by dividing the counts per second of IL-1β, IL-8, ENA-78, or iNOS by the corresponding value for GAPDH expression. The result obtained was then used to calculate the relative ratio of expression of cytokines or inflammatory mediators in infected cells to the medium control. This final ratio was used to construct the graphs presented in Fig. 3. The data were calculated as means ± standard errors of the means, and the medium control value was normalized as 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Primer and probe sequences for PCR and ELOCA

Sandwich ELISA for IL-8.To confirm whether increased mRNA expression correlated with protein secretion, levels of one representative cytokine (IL-8, a marker for neutrophilic inflammation) were measured in the culture supernatants of infected cells. The epithelial cell lines were grown to confluency in 24-mm-diameter Transwell plates (Costar). Seven hours after infection with T. spiralis or L. monocytogenes, the culture supernatants from the lower compartments of the cluster plate were collected and stored at −20°C. IL-8 was measured by sandwich ELISA using Mab618-biotinylated BAF218 (R&D Systems) as the cytokine-specific antibodies. Cytokine levels were quantified against recombinant human IL-8 standard (208-IL-010) (R&D Systems). The lower sensitivity of the assay was 32 pg/ml, calculated as the mean optical density value of [20 replicated medium controls plus two times the standard deviations]. Any test wells with optical density values above this sensitivity were considered positive for IL-8.

Statistics.The results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and Student’s t test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Behavior of T. spiralis in human intestinal epithelial monolayers.Light microscopy studies showed that bile-activated infective larvae invaded and migrated within the epithelial monolayers shortly after the agar overlay was applied (Fig.1A). The presence of the agar was critical in providing initial mechanical support for the larvae. Without the agar, infective larvae could move only over the epithelial monolayers and did not penetrate the epithelial cells. However, once the infective larvae were embedded in the epithelial monolayers, they continued to invade and migrate even when the agar was removed.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Light microscopy of human colonic epithelial monolayers infected by T. spiralis. (A) With trypan blue staining, the infective larva (arrow) can be seen to have left a trail of dead cells after invasion and migration in Caco-2 epithelial monolayers. (B) Trails of damaged T84 epithelial cells consist of many dead cells (arrow), which are larger than adjacent cells and have enlarged nuclei.

The invasive behavior of T. spiralis varied with the state of the larvae and the nature of the epithelial cell lines. Bile-treated infective larvae invaded epithelial cells more rapidly than freshly pepsin-digested infective larvae. Moreover, the degree of invasion of infective larvae in epithelial cells was in the order of Caco-2, T84, and HT29 cells, as indicated by the speed of invasion of the larvae and the extent of damage to epithelial cells (data not shown).

The morphology of the damaged epithelial cells afterTrichinella invasion was studied by trypan blue and toluidine blue staining. With trypan blue staining, it was observed that the infective larvae left behind trails of dead cells (Fig. 1B). These cells were larger in size than adjacent cells. With toluidine blue staining, these dead cells were lightly stained whereas unaffected cells were stained deeply blue. The zigzag pattern of the trails reflected the serpentine movement of the larvae in the monolayers.

Ultrastructural changes in epithelial cells afterTrichinella invasion.TEM studies showed that the epithelial cells were seriously damaged after invasion by T. spiralis. The infective larvae injured the cells sequentially as they moved through the monolayers, and only the cells in direct contact with the larvae were damaged (Fig. 2A). The infected cells were larger in size, and their cytoplasm and nuclei were less electron dense. The cell membranes of infected cells were severely disrupted (Fig. 2B). However, only the membrane in direct contact with the cuticular surface of the larva was disrupted (Fig.2C), the apical and lateral membranes of the same cell remaining intact. Moreover, the infected cells showed either loss or dilution of cytoplasmic proteins. Other ultrastructural changes in the infected cells included swelling of nuclei and mitochondria (Fig. 2D). Disruption of cell membranes also extended to the nuclear membrane. When this was in direct contact with the larval surface, the nuclear membrane ruptured and the nucleus disintegrated (Fig. 2E). However, no nuclear fragmentation was observed. Therefore, it appeared that the larvae damaged the cells by disrupting the cell membranes. In consequence, the cells lost osmotic control, their organelles became swollen, and the infected cells eventually burst.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

TEM of human colonic epithelial cells infected byT. spiralis. (A) Infective larva (L) penetrating an HT29 epithelial monolayer. The cytoplasm and nuclei of adjacent cells (AC) are less electron dense than intact cells. (B) Invasion of infective larva (L) into HT29 cells. Note the disruption (arrows) of the membranes of adjacent cells. (C) Damage of cells along the path of the larva. Note the disruption of the membrane (large arrow) and the loss of cytoplasmic proteins of the cell (AC1). Only the cell membrane in direct contact with the cuticle (C) of the larva is disrupted, whereas the lateral membrane (small arrow) of the same cell remains intact. (D) The mitochondrion (arrow) and nucleus (N) of the infected HT29 cell (AC) are swollen compared to the adjacent normal cell (NC) and its mitochondrion (M). (E) The nuclear membrane (arrow) of a Caco-2 cell in direct contact with the infective larva (L) is disrupted.

Production of cytokines and iNOS in epithelial cells in response to invasion by pathogens.Three different intestinal epithelial cell lines were used to study the production of proinflammatory cytokines and inflammatory mediators in response to invasion. The response toT. spiralis was compared to that elicited by bacterial invasion, with L. monocytogenes used as a positive control.

By RT-PCR and ELOCA, it was shown that invasion by T. spiralis caused an elevation of mRNA of IL-1β, IL-8, and ENA-78 in the epithelial cells after 5 h of infection (Fig.3). The observed increase was dose dependent. Levels of IL-1β, IL-8, and ENA-78 were increased even when 1,000 larvae were used, but much greater increases were seen with 5,000 larvae. However, no increase in iNOS mRNA was seen afterTrichinella invasion at any dose level. No changes in mRNA for TNF-α or TGF-β were seen (data not shown). Infection with L. monocytogenes also caused an increase of IL-1β, IL-8, and ENA-78 in all cell lines, but the iNOS mRNA transcript was also upregulated. Similar results were obtained with other enteroinvasive bacteria (Salmonella enteritidis andE. coli [data not shown]).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Ratios of cytokine PCR products of intestinal epithelial cell lines infected with T. spiralis and L. monocytogenes obtained by RT-PCR and ELOCA. Monolayers of HT29 (A), T84, (B), and Caco-2 (C) cells were infected with 1 × 103, 3 × 103, and 5 × 103 infective larvae of T. spiralis or 107 CFU of L. monocytogenes per ml. After 5 h of infection, total RNA extracted from each sample was used for semiquantitative RT-PCR and ELOCA to examine the levels of expression of mRNA of IL-1β, IL-8, ENA-78, and iNOS. The experiments were repeated twice, and results are presented as ratios of infected to control cell lines, as described in Materials and Methods. *, statistically significant compared with uninfected medium control (P < 0.05).

Elevated mRNA expression for IL-8 correlated with increased secretion of IL-8 by infected epithelial cells. By sandwich ELISA, secreted IL-8 was found to be increased in all cell lines after infection withT. spiralis or L. monocytogenes (Table2). Compared with medium and agar controls, epithelial cells produced significantly higher levels of IL-8 in the lower compartments of the cluster plate after 7 h of infection with T. spiralis or L. monocytogenes. The levels of IL-8 released by epithelial cells were similar whether they were infected with T. spiralis or L. monocytogenes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Secretion of IL-8 by human colonic epithelial monolayers after infection with T. spiralis andL. monocytogenesa

DISCUSSION

The outcome of infection of the gastrointestinal tract is determined by the host’s ability to mount innate and adaptive immune responses. The inflammatory changes which accompany these responses may play an important role in host defense but can also have pathological consequences. Studies with gastrointestinal nematodes have contributed to a greater understanding of the capacity of the intestine to mount immune and inflammatory responses to infection, especially those mediated by T cells (33). The majority of studies, however, have concentrated on the development and expression of these responses rather than on their induction. Recent studies of host defense against other pathogens have shown that early expression of innate, nonspecific immunity may determine the outcome of later adaptive, specific immune responses (9). For many invasive intestinal nematodes, epithelial cells are the first point of host contact. Data from many studies have shown that epithelial cells play an integral role in mucosal immune responses (1, 15). Epithelial responses to invasion by nematodes may therefore provide data relevant to the induction of mucosal immune and inflammatory responses.

Invasion by T. spiralis produced significant damage in epithelial cells at the ultrastructural level and resulted in increased mRNA for IL-1β, IL-8, and ENA-78. Cell damage was associated with disruption of the cell membrane. With the loss of osmotic control, the damaged cells showed increased size, dilution of cytoplasmic proteins, and swelling of organelles, eventually becoming necrotic and bursting. This is very different from bacterial infections in which epithelial cells die by apoptosis. For example, in Clostridium difficile infection, bacterial toxin A induced cell rounding, detachment, and apoptosis in epithelial cell lines and organ cultures of human colonic biopsy specimens (19). Moreover, apoptosis in HT29 epithelial cell lines induced by invasive S. dublinand E. coli was related to NO production (16).

Epithelial cell invasion is necessary for most intestinal pathogens to establish infection. Although various molecules which mediate adherence and invasion have been identified in some intracellular pathogens, in many cases the mechanism of invasion is still unclear. The in vitro model used here suggests that T. spiralis may injure epithelial cells by mechanical and biochemical means. Based on the speed of invasion, mechanical movement is likely to be the major method. However, the loss of membrane integrity of epithelial cells in direct contact with the larvae suggests that there may be molecules either on the surface or released in secretions which facilitate invasion. Excretory-secretory (ES) products of T. spiralisare known to contain serine proteases, cysteine proteases, and metalloproteinases (2, 30) and may contain pore-forming proteins similar to those of Trichuris nematodes, which also develop exclusively within the intestinal epithelium (6).

Data from many sources, with a variety of cell lines and pathogens, suggest that cell line models of pathogen invasion provide data relevant to in vivo events (8, 14, 25). Although these cell lines are all transformed, they are well established in studies of infection with bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. Primary cell lines, although closer to in vivo characteristics, are not suitable for experiments involving invasion of worm parasites, as they are more difficult to establish and maintain for long periods. The damage to epithelial cells by T. spiralis described here in vitro is similar to that obtained in vivo. By using TEM, it was shown that the membranes of invaded cells became increasingly convoluted the closer they were to the larvae (7). Damaged epithelial cells showed degenerative changes, such as loss of microvilli, disruption of apical membranes, and swelling of mitochondria. In 1979, Wright showed that the larvae lie within the cytoplasm of epithelial cells (36); however, this was not seen in the present study. The infective larvae appeared to invaginate rather than penetrate the cell membranes and came to lie in the cytoplasm after the cell membranes were disrupted. This difference may be due to differences in the three-dimensional architecture of the epithelium in vivo and in vitro.

Both nematode and bacterial invasions resulted in transcriptional activation of IL-1β, IL-8, and ENA-78, but only bacteria elicited increased iNOS mRNA. The upregulation of these proinflammatory cytokines may contribute to the initiation of acute inflammatory responses and restitution (epithelial cell repair). IL-1β is known to attract and activate macrophages, NK cells, and T and B cells and has been found by RT-PCR in primary epithelial cells from rats after 2 days of infection with T. spiralis (28). IL-8 and ENA-78 are C-X-C chemokines that are potent chemoattractants and activators of neutrophils (31). Epithelial cell-derived IL-8 released as a result of bacterial invasion was shown to attract neutrophils by transforming the matrix components of epithelial cells (22). Moreover, IL-8 was recently shown to attract T cells and monocytes via degranulation of neutrophils (29). Both IL-1β and IL-8 were shown to stimulate intestinal restitution in IEC-6 cell lines (4, 5). ENA-78 is a newly discovered neutrophil chemoattractant initially isolated from the conditioned media of the IL-1- or TNF-activated A549 human lung type II alveolar epithelial cell line (35). The amino acid sequence of ENA-78 shows 22% similarity to that of IL-8 and 48 to 51% similarity to GRO-α/β/γ. Based on cross-desensitization experiments, it has been suggested that ENA-78 activity is mediated through the IL-8 receptor type (17). Increases in the level of ENA-78 have been detected in epithelial cells in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (38). Recent studies of activated human colonic epithelial cells showed that the patterns of production of IL-8 and ENA-78 were different (37). IL-8 production was very short-lived, whereas ENA-78 was long lasting but delayed in onset, occurring only when IL-8 secretion was downregulated. This suggested that IL-8 and ENA-78 may be important in both early and later stages of mucosal inflammation and could therefore contribute to the pattern of inflammatory responses seen in T. spiralis infection.

The upregulation of mRNA transcripts of iNOS in epithelial cells after invasion by bacteria suggests that NO may be important in mucosal defense. NO from activated macrophages is known to control and inhibit intracellular pathogens, and NO from epithelial cells has recently been shown to inhibit the intraepithelial growth of Chlamydiaspecies (12). The differences in the expression of iNOS in epithelial cells injured by bacteria and T. spiralis may be due to the expression of iNOS in epithelial cells that undergo apoptosis. NO has been shown to induce apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells after bacterial invasion (16). Epithelial NO may not be important in innate defense mechanisms against multicellular parasites, and this may explain the lack of iNOS induction in T. spiralis-injured epithelial cells. However, other animal studies showed that when rats were givenl-NAME, a nonselective inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, orally for 6 days, there was increased NO activity in the mucosa and a reduced number of adult worms of T. spiralis in the small intestine (11). Therefore, it appears that iNOS from other cellular sources may be involved in the acquired effector mechanism against intestinal nematodes.

In conclusion, the data presented here show that transcriptional activation of proinflammatory cytokines follows invasion of intestinal epithelial cells by both prokaryotic and eukaryotic pathogens. In the case of T. spiralis, these cytokines may initiate the protective acute inflammatory response by recruiting and activating cells in the lamina propria. The patterns of production of proinflammatory cytokines and inflammatory mediators are different between different groups of invasive pathogens.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the Hong Kong Croucher Foundation and the University of Nottingham. The electron microscopy unit of the Histopathology Department was generously supported by Wellcome Trust (grant 048326). Chris Li is a postdoctoral research fellow of the Hong Kong Croucher Foundation.

Judy Appleton gave helpful advice.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 10 November 1997.
    • Returned for modification 23 December 1997.
    • Accepted 18 February 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Christ A. D.,
    2. Blumberg R. S.
    The intestinal epithelial cells: immunological aspects. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 18 1996 449 461
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Criado-Fornelio A.,
    2. Armas-Serra C.,
    3. Gimenez-Pardo C.,
    4. Casado-Escribano N.,
    5. Jimenez-Gonzalez A.,
    6. Rodriguez-Caabeiro F.
    Proteolytic enzymes from Trichinella spiralis larvae. Vet. Parasitol. 45 1992 133 140
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Crowe S. E.,
    2. Alvarez L.,
    3. Dytoc M.,
    4. Hunt R. H.,
    5. Muller M.,
    6. Sherman P.,
    7. Patel J.,
    8. Jin Y.,
    9. Ernst P. B.
    Expression of interleukin-8 and CD54 by human gastric epithelium after Helicobacter pylori infection in vitro. Gastroenterology 108 1995 65 74
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Dignass A. U.,
    2. Podolsky D. K.
    Cytokine modulation of intestinal epithelial cell restitution: central role of transforming growth factor β. Gastroenterology 105 1993 1323 1332
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Dignass A. U.,
    2. Hotz A.,
    3. Becker A.,
    4. Goebell H.
    Interleukin-8 (IL-8) stimulates intestinal epithelial restitution in vitro. Gastroenterology 112 1997 A960
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. 6.↵
    1. Drake L.,
    2. Korchev Y.,
    3. Bashford L.,
    4. Djamgoz M.,
    5. Wakelin D.,
    6. Ashall F.,
    7. Bundy D.
    The major secreted product of the whipworm, Trichuris, is a pore-forming protein. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257 1994 255 261
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Dunn I. J.,
    2. Wright K. A.
    Cell injury caused by Trichinella spiralis in the mucosal epithelium of B10A mice. J. Parasitol. 71 1985 757 766
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Eckmann L.,
    2. Reed S. L.,
    3. Smith J. R.,
    4. Kagnoff M. F.
    Entamoeba histolytica trophozoites induce an inflammatory cytokine response by cultured human cells through the paracrine action of cytolytically released interleukin-1α. J. Clin. Invest. 96 1995 1269 1279
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Fearon D. T.,
    2. Locksley R. M.
    The instructive role of innate immunity in the acquired immune response. Science 272 1996 50 54
    OpenUrlAbstract
  10. 10.↵
    1. Finkelman F. D.,
    2. Shea-Donohue T.,
    3. Goldhill J.,
    4. Sullivan C. A.,
    5. Morris S. C.,
    6. Madden K. B.,
    7. Gause W. C.,
    8. Urban J. F.
    Cytokine regulation of host defense against parasitic gastrointestinal nematodes: lessons from studies with rodent models. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15 1997 505 533
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hogaboam C. M.,
    2. Collins S. M.,
    3. Blennerhassett M. G.
    Effects of oral L-NAME during Trichinella spiralis infection in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 271 1996 G338 G346
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Igietseme J. U.,
    2. Uriri I. M.,
    3. Chow M.,
    4. Abe E.,
    5. Rank R.
    Inhibition of intracellular multiplication of human strains of Chlamydia trachomatis by nitric oxide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 232 1997 595 601
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. James S.
    Role of nitric oxide in parasitic infections. Microbiol. Rev. 59 1995 533 547
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Jung H. C.,
    2. Eckmann L.,
    3. Yang S. K.,
    4. Panja A.,
    5. Fierer J.,
    6. Morzycka-Wroblewska E.,
    7. Kagnoff M. F.
    A distinct array of proinflammatory cytokines is expressed in human colon epithelial cells in response to bacterial invasion. J. Clin. Invest. 95 1995 55 65
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kagnoff M. F.,
    2. Eckmann L.
    Epithelial cells as sensors for microbial infection. J. Clin. Invest. 100 1997 6 10
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Kim J. M.,
    2. Witthoft T.,
    3. Eckmann L.,
    4. Kagnoff M. F.
    Bacterial invasion of intestinal epithelial cells induces programmed cell death. Gastroenterology 112 1997 A1013
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Koch A. E.,
    2. Kunkel S. L.,
    3. Larlow L. A.,
    4. Mazarakis D. D.,
    5. Haines G. K.,
    6. Burdick M. D.,
    7. Pope R. M.,
    8. Strieter R. M.
    Macrophage inflammatory protein-1α. A novel chemotactic cytokine for macrophages in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Clin. Invest. 93 1994 921 928
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Larsh J. E.,
    2. Race G. J.
    Allergic inflammation as a hypothesis for the expulsion of worms from tissues: a review. Exp. Parasitol. 37 1975 251 266
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Mahida Y. R.,
    2. Makh S.,
    3. Hyde S.,
    4. Gray T.,
    5. Borriello S. P.
    Effect of Clostridium difficile toxin A on human intestinal epithelial cells: induction of interleukin 8 production and apoptosis after cell detachment. Gut 38 1996 337 347
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. ManWarren T.,
    2. Gagliardo L.,
    3. Geyer J.,
    4. McVay C.,
    5. Pearce-Kelling S.,
    6. Appleton J.
    Invasion of intestinal epithelia in vitro by the parasitic nematode Trichinella spiralis. Infect. Immun. 65 1997 4806 4812
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. McCormick B. A.,
    2. Hofman P. M.,
    3. Kim J.,
    4. Carnes D. K.,
    5. Miller S. I.,
    6. Madara J. L.
    Surface attachment of Salmonella typhimurium to intestinal epithelia imprints the subepithelial matrix with gradients chemotactic for neutrophils. J. Cell Biol. 131 1995 1599 1608
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. McCormick B. A.,
    2. Colgan S. P.,
    3. Delp-Archer C.,
    4. Miller G.,
    5. Blaser M. J.,
    6. Madara J. L.
    Salmonella typhimurium attachment to human intestinal epithelial monolayers: transcellular signalling to subepithelial neutrophils. J. Cell Biol. 123 1993 895 907
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. McLaughlan J. M.,
    2. Seth R.,
    3. Vautier G.,
    4. Robins A.,
    5. Scott B.,
    6. Hawkey C. J.,
    7. Jenkins D.
    Interleukin-8 and inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA levels in inflammatory bowel disease at first presentation. J. Pathol. 81 1997 87 92
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Miller M. J. S.,
    2. Thompson J. H.,
    3. Zhang X. J.,
    4. Sadowska-Krowicka H.,
    5. Kakkis J.,
    6. Munshi U. K.,
    7. Sandoval M.,
    8. Rossi J. L.,
    9. Eloby-Childress S.,
    10. Beckman J. S.,
    11. Ye Y. Z.,
    12. Rodi C. P.,
    13. Manning P. T.,
    14. Currie M. G.,
    15. Clark D. A.
    Role of inducible nitric oxide synthase expression and peroxynitrite formation in guinea pig ileitis. Gastroenterology 190 1995 1475 1483
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. 25.↵
    1. Rasmussen S. J.,
    2. Eckmann L.,
    3. Quayle A. J.,
    4. Shen L.,
    5. Zhang Y. X.,
    6. Anderson D. J.,
    7. Fierer J.,
    8. Stephens R. S.,
    9. Kagnoff M. F.
    Secretion of proinflammatory cytokines by epithelial cells in response to Chlamydia infection suggests a central role for epithelial cells in chlamydial pathogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 99 1997 77 87
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Ruitenberg E. J.,
    2. Elgersma A.
    Absence of intestinal mast cell response in congenitally athymic mice during Trichinella spiralis infection. Nature (London) 264 1976 258 260
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Singer I. I.,
    2. Kawka E. W.,
    3. Scott S.,
    4. Weidner J. R.,
    5. Mumford R. A.,
    6. Riehl T. E.,
    7. Stenson W. F.
    Expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase and nitrotyrosine in colonic epithelium inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 111 1996 871 885
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Stadnyk A. W.,
    2. Kearsey J. A.
    Pattern of proinflammatory cytokine mRNA expression during Trichinella spiralis infection of the rat. Infect. Immun. 64 1996 5138 5143
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Taub D. D.,
    2. Anver M.,
    3. Oppenheim J. J.,
    4. Longo D. L.,
    5. Murphy W. J.
    T lymphocyte recruitment by interleukin-8 (IL-8): IL-8-induced degranulation of neutrophils releases potent chemoattractants for human T lymphocytes both in vitro and in vivo. J. Clin. Invest. 97 1996 1931 1941
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Todorova V. K.,
    2. Knox D. P.,
    3. Kennedy M. W.
    Proteinases in the excretory/secretory products (ES) of adult Trichinella spiralis. Parasitology 111 1995 201 208
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Van Damme J.
    Interleukin-8 and related chemotactic cytokines The cytokine handbook 2nd ed. Thomson A. 1994 184 208 Academic Press London, United Kingdom
  32. 32.↵
    1. Wakelin D.,
    2. Denhem D. A.
    The immune responses Trichinella and trichinosis. Campbell W. C. 1983 265 308 Plenum Press New York, N.Y
  33. 33.↵
    1. Wakelin D.,
    2. Lloyd M.
    Immunity to primary and challenge infections of Trichinella spiralis in mice: a re-examination of conventional parameters. Parasitology 72 1976 173 182
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Wakelin D.,
    2. Grencis R. K.
    T-cell and genetic control of inflammatory cells Allergy and immunity to helminths. Moqbel R. 1992 107 136 Taylor and Francis London, United Kingdom
  35. 35.↵
    1. Walz A.,
    2. Burgener R.,
    3. Car B.,
    4. Baggiolini M.,
    5. Kunkel S. L.,
    6. Strieter R. M.
    Structure and neutrophil-activating properties of a novel inflammatory peptide (ENA-78) with homology to interleukin-8. J. Exp. Med. 174 1991 1355 1362
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Wright K. A.
    Trichinella spiralis: an intracellular parasite in the intestine phase. J. Parasitol. 65 1979 441 445
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    1. Yang S. K.,
    2. Eckmann L.,
    3. Panja A.,
    4. Kagnoff M. F.
    Differential and regulated expression of C-X-C, C-C and C-chemokines by human colon epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 113 1997 1214 1223
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Z’Graggen K.,
    2. Walz A.,
    3. Mazzucchelli L.,
    4. Strieter R. M.,
    5. Muller C.
    The C-X-C chemokine ENA-78 is preferentially expressed in intestinal epithelium in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 113 1997 808 816
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Production of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Inflammatory Mediators in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells after Invasion by Trichinella spiralis
Chris K. F. Li, Rashmi Seth, Trevor Gray, Roger Bayston, Yashwant R. Mahida, Derek Wakelin
Infection and Immunity May 1998, 66 (5) 2200-2206; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.5.2200-2206.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Production of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Inflammatory Mediators in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells after Invasion by Trichinella spiralis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Production of Proinflammatory Cytokines and Inflammatory Mediators in Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells after Invasion by Trichinella spiralis
Chris K. F. Li, Rashmi Seth, Trevor Gray, Roger Bayston, Yashwant R. Mahida, Derek Wakelin
Infection and Immunity May 1998, 66 (5) 2200-2206; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.5.2200-2206.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

cytokines
Inflammation Mediators
Intestinal Mucosa
Trichinella spiralis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522