Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PATHOGENESIS

Haemophilus ducreyi Infection Causes Basal Keratinocyte Cytotoxicity and Elicits a Unique Cytokine Induction Pattern in an In Vitro Human Skin Model

Marcia M. Hobbs, Terry R. Paul, Priscilla B. Wyrick, Thomas H. Kawula
Marcia M. Hobbs
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terry R. Paul
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Priscilla B. Wyrick
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas H. Kawula
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.6.2914-2921.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Haemophilus ducreyi is the etiologic agent of the sexually transmitted genital ulcer disease chancroid. Predominantly a cutaneous pathogen, H. ducreyi is present in chancroid ulcers that are characterized by extensive neutrophil accumulation in intraepidermal lesions accompanied by a mononuclear infiltrate in the dermis. We used an in vitro human skin model composed of foreskin fibroblasts and keratinocytes to examine host skin cell interactions with H. ducreyi 35000. Bacteria replicated and persisted in artificial skin for at least 14 days. We observed H. ducreyi inside suprabasal keratinocytes using transmission electron microscopy. Although no bacteria were seen in the basal keratinocyte region, these cells were disrupted in infected cocultures.H. ducreyi infection stimulated increased secretion of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-8 by skin cells. Conversely, tumor necrosis factor alpha and IL-1α levels were not elevated. IL-8 produced in response to H. ducreyi infection may be involved in recruiting polymorphonuclear leukocytes and other inflammatory cells, thereby contributing to the tissue necrosis and ulcer formation characteristic of chancroid.

Chancroid, an ulcerating cutaneous infection caused by Haemophilus ducreyi, is one of the most prevalent sexually transmitted diseases in developing countries (61) and is endemic in some areas of the United States (6, 8, 16, 19, 36). Chancroid is a recognized cofactor for human immunodeficiency virus transmission (33, 40), makingH. ducreyi the focus of considerable recent research aimed at understanding the molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis. Chancroid ulcers contain a superficial zone of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and extracellular debris accompanied by a dermal infiltrate of T cells and macrophages (20, 38, 61). The mechanisms by whichH. ducreyi causes or induces epithelial destruction during infection are not known.

Several potential H. ducreyi virulence factors have been identified, including lipooligosaccharide (LOS) (11), pili (9), and the production of extracellular cytotoxin(s) (30, 31, 44) and hemolysin (41, 60). Understanding the relative contributions of these factors and identifying other bacterial components essential for H. ducreyi pathogenesis require appropriate models of infection. Several useful animal models have been described, including rabbits (25, 43), primates (59), and pigs (27), and experimental human challenge studies employ the natural host for H. ducreyi infection (52, 53). Absent from the repertoire of experimental chancroid systems has been a relevant in vitro human skin cell model.

Human tissue culture monolayers have been used as in vitro substrates for adherence and invasion studies with a number of sexually transmitted pathogens, including Neisseria gonorrhoeae,Treponema pallidum, and Chlamydia trachomatis(28, 48, 57). Similar studies with H. ducreyi and cultured human foreskin fibroblasts have yielded confusing and often contradictory results. Several independent studies have shown thatH. ducreyi adheres to fibroblasts; some indicate that the bacteria are invasive (32), and others suggest that the bacilli are not found within these host cells (2, 3). While fibroblasts are present in the dermis, the relevance of H. ducreyi attachment to and invasion of these cells has not been demonstrated in vivo. Keratinocytes are the predominant epithelial cell in the epidermis and are likely the first host cells with whichH. ducreyi interacts during infection. Recent studies with purified human foreskin keratinocytes or primary human foreskin epithelial cells grown in monolayers suggest that H. ducreyiattaches to (10) and invades (58) these cells.

Cultured cells offer host tissue relevance and ease of growth and manipulation; however, cellular morphology and the distribution of cell surface components in monolayers may not accurately reproduce the environment encountered by an organism infecting the human host. By using alternative tissue culture substrates and techniques, it is possible to maintain polarized epithelial cell layers in vitro with differentiated apical and basolateral surfaces and well-developed tight junctions. Artificial tissue systems have been constructed by layering relevant cell types. An artificial skin model has been developed using neonatal foreskin fibroblasts and keratinocytes in a coculture system composed of dermal, epidermal, and stratum corneum layers anchored to a nylon mesh support (17, 55). Important features of the model include the development of a basal lamina and anchoring zone (13) supporting the stratified epithelium composed of keratinocytes expressing the K1 keratin differentiation marker (50). K1 is expressed by epithelial cells in human foreskin and adult skin, but not by keratinocytes cultured in monolayers (50).

In the present study, we examined the interactions of virulent H. ducreyi 35000 with human foreskin keratinocytes and fibroblasts in infected artificial skin. Bacteria were observed inside suprabasal keratinocytes, and structural changes in the epidermis were consistent with the pathology of chancroid. We characterized the cellular interleukin-1α (IL-1α), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), IL-6, and IL-8 responses to H. ducreyi infection and herein describe an unusual pattern of proinflammatory cytokine induction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human foreskin keratinocyte-fibroblast cocultures (KFCs).Artificial skin samples (Skin2 model ZK 1300) were obtained from Advanced Tissue Sciences (ATS; LaJolla, Calif.). Culture conditions have been previously described in detail (39). Briefly, human neonatal foreskin fibroblasts and keratinocytes were isolated and expanded into monolayer cultures (13). Fibroblasts seeded onto an inert nylon mesh grew submerged for 26 days, during which time they secreted an extracellular matrix (ECM) composed of mature collagen fibrils, fibronectin, and both sulfated and nonsulfated glycosaminoglycans (51). Keratinocytes were seeded onto the dermal substrate, grown submerged for 1 week, and then raised to the air-liquid interface. Cocultures were maintained for 13 days at ATS before squares (9 by 9 mm) were laser cut and placed on agarose containing growth medium with antibiotics for shipment and overnight delivery.

Upon receipt in our laboratory, KFCs were placed with the dermal side resting on the permeable membrane of 25-mm MilliCell culture inserts (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) inside 35-mm chambers of six-well tissue culture plates (Corning Costar, New York, N.Y.). Cells were maintained at 35°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% (vol/vol) CO2with 1 ml of tissue culture medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 5% fetal calf serum and 100 μg of ascorbate and 0.5 μg of hydrocortisone per ml) supplied beneath the insert and replaced daily. In this system, liquid medium contacts the lower surface of the culture inserts, but the artificial skin squares and bacterial inocula are maintained at the air interface and are not immersed in fluid. KFCs were equilibrated with antibiotic-free medium for 3 days prior to inoculation to ensure that residual antibiotics were removed from the tissue.

Microscopic analysis of uninfected KFCs confirmed the presence of a well-developed epidermis overlaying a dermal equivalent of fibroblasts embedded in secreted ECM material (see Fig. 2). Basal keratinocytes formed a characteristic columnar layer with several suprabasal squamous cell layers covered by a thin stratum corneum. The extent of epidermal differentiation and functional properties of KFCs are detailed elsewhere (13, 50, 51, 56, 63).

Bacterial cultures and inoculation procedures. H. ducreyi 35000 (ATCC 33922) was isolated in Winnipeg, Canada, in the 1970s (24). The virulence of this isolate has been demonstrated in several animal models of infection (27, 43, 53, 59). Escherichia coli CC118 (34) and an uncharacterized isolate of Staphylococcus epidermidis were used as controls in some experiments. Bacteria were grown on chocolate agar (Difco GC agar base, 1% [wt/vol] IsoVitaleX [Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.], and 1% hemoglobin) at 35°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% [vol/vol] CO2 and passaged daily up to three times from frozen stocks.

Inocula were prepared from log-phase cultures grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with 1% IsoVitaleX and 50 μg of hemin per ml. Dilutions were made with filtered culture supernatants to maintain the concentration of potential bacterial virulence factors secreted during growth in vitro. Approximately 105 CFU in 10 μl were applied to the surface of KFCs. Filtered H. ducreyi culture supernatants and heat-killed inocula were applied to separate artificial foreskin squares to determine the relative contributions of secreted and heat-labile bacterial products in this model of infection. Controls for each experiment included BHI broth-inoculated and untreated but abraded samples. Infected and control cocultures were incubated at 35°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% (vol/vol) CO2.

Preliminary experiments to determine the degree of abrasion required for H. ducreyi infection and productive interaction with foreskin cells in this model were conducted. Inocula were delivered by painting KFCs with a pipette tip as 10 μl was dispensed evenly over the surface of the square. In some experiments, inocula were dropped onto squares without mechanically perturbing the surface. Ultimately, uniform abrasion was achieved by using a sterile cytology brush with the tip bent at a right angle to the handle. The bristles of the brush were tapped lightly across the entire surface of each square, moving first horizontally and then vertically and along both diagonals. The inoculum was dropped onto the center of each square immediately after surface abrasion. The results presented here are from two independent experiments, with different lots of KFCs, abraded with cytology brushes before inoculation. Uninoculated control KFCs were also abraded. For each experiment, three to seven individual squares were included in each treatment or control group.

Bacterial recovery and sample collection.At various times after inoculation, artificial foreskin samples were rinsed three times with 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove loosely attached bacteria. To control for the effects of this procedure on subsequent microscopic and biochemical analyses, all samples, including uninoculated controls, were rinsed at the time of harvesting. Rinsed squares were quartered, and portions of each sample were fixed in 10% formalin for routine histology and 2% paraformaldehyde with 0.05% glutaraldehyde for electron microscopy, and these were frozen for future immunohistochemical analyses. The remaining quarter of samples infected with live H. ducreyi was incubated for 30 min in swelling buffer (1 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris, 0.25 M sucrose) to render the eukaryotic cells osmotically fragile. Samples were then subjected to two 10-s bursts in a sonicating water bath, serially diluted in PBS, and plated on chocolate agar in duplicate. This procedure did not affect recovery from control H. ducreyi suspensions and resulted in lysis of the foreskin cells as judged by microscopic examination. Thus, potentially adherent and invasive bacteria would be recovered from these samples. Cell-associated counts recovered from one-fourth of a square (9 by 9 mm) were multiplied by 4 to normalize recovery to the entire sample. Likewise, the numbers of CFU per milliliter in PBS washes were multiplied by 3 for comparison with cell-associated counts.

At each sampling time, the 1 ml of culture medium beneath cell culture inserts was removed from all samples and replaced with fresh medium. Samples were aliquoted and stored at −70°C.

Cytokine assays.Human TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-6, and IL-8 Quantikine kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.) were used with a slight modification of the manufacturer’s directions to determine cytokine concentrations in culture medium collected from KFCs. Sample and standard volumes (50 versus 100 μl) used were smaller than those suggested in product inserts for TNF-α and IL-1α. The minimum detectable concentrations were 4.4 and 0.5 pg/ml for TNF-α and IL-1α, respectively. Samples were diluted 1:100 and 1:1,000 to determine IL-6 and IL-8 concentrations, respectively. These assays were performed exactly as recommended by the manufacturer. The minimum detectable concentrations were 0.7 and 18 pg/ml for IL-6 and IL-8, respectively. Cytokine concentrations were expressed as picograms per milliliter for TNF-α and IL-1α and as nanograms per milliliter for IL-6 and IL-8.

Statistical analyses.Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. H. ducreyi recovery data (Fig. 1) are from two separate experiments with a total of two to seven individual infected skin squares per time point, plated in duplicate. Cytokine concentrations (see Fig. 4) are from two separate experiments with a total of five to nine individual skin squares per time point, determined in duplicate. Since the data exhibited normal distributions, comparisons between treatment groups and controls were made by using the paired or unpaired Student’s t test, as indicated in the text.

Microscopy.For light microscopy, formalin-fixed samples were embedded in paraffin, processed for routine histology, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. H. ducreyi were identified in these samples by visual comparison with pure cultures prepared in the same way. Fixed samples of KFCs inoculated with live or heat-killedH. ducreyi were embedded in Epon or Lowicryl resin as previously described (64) for transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Specimens were examined in a Zeiss electron microscope operating at 60 kV. For immunoelectron microscopy, grids containing sections of Lowicryl-embedded samples were probed with a 1:100 dilution of rabbit antiserum that had been raised against formalin-fixed, whole H. ducreyi 35000. Nonspecific antibody binding was blocked with 1% ovalbumin in PBS containing 0.01 M glycine. The secondary antibody was goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugated to 15-nm gold particles. As a control, pure H. ducreyi cultures embedded in Lowicryl and labeled in this way routinely bound three to eight gold particles/bacterium (data not shown).

RESULTS

H. ducreyi replicate and persist in KFCs for 1 to 2 weeks.We infected human foreskin KFCs with virulent H. ducreyi 35000. The kinetics of bacterial growth and recovery in the model are shown in Fig. 1. Approximately 5.0 log10 CFU of log-phase bacteria were inoculated onto the abraded surface of squares (9 by 9 mm) of artificial skin. H. ducreyi achieved a density of approximately 5.9 log10 CFU/square over the first 6 h. This culture was maintained with daily medium changes beneath the cell culture inserts for 7 days in these experiments (Fig. 1, circles). In a single experiment using an artificial skin square (11 by 11 mm) with a similar inoculum, 6.1 log10 CFU of H. ducreyiwere recovered 14 days after inoculation. When 5.8 log10CFU of H. ducreyi were inoculated onto nylon mesh squares without skin cells, 1.8 log10 CFU were recovered from the bare substrate at day 4 (Fig. 1, squares). Although bacteria were never immersed in fluid in the artificial skin system, we examined the growth of H. ducreyi in culture medium for comparison with growth in the intact system. In culture medium alone, without foreskin cells,H. ducreyi viability declined to 3.7 log10 CFU over 4 days (Fig. 1, triangles). Thus, human KFCs provided an environment that supported a steady-state bacterial culture that was not maintained in the absence of eukaryotic cells. H. ducreyi replicated and persisted in vitro in KFCs for up to 2 weeks, consistent with bacterial recovery from naturally occurring (37, 45) and experimental (52, 53) chancroid lesions of several days’ to several weeks’ duration.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Time course of H. ducreyi recovery from infected artificial skin. Approximately 105 CFU of strain 35000 were inoculated onto the abraded surfaces of skin squares (9 by 9 mm). Total recovery from skin squares was calculated from quantitative cultures of rinsed plus adherent bacteria (circles). Data are from two independent experiments with a total of two to seven individual infected skin squares per time point, plated in duplicate. Data forH. ducreyi cells recovered from single samples of blank nylon mesh (squares) and cell culture medium without eukaryotic cells (triangles) are shown for comparison.

In contrast to the moderate growth of H. ducreyi in artificial skin, E. coli grew vigorously, achieving a density of 8.2 log10 CFU/square 4 days after inoculation with 5.5 log10 CFU. Light microscopic inspection ofE. coli-infected skin squares revealed massive cellular destruction with no intact foreskin cells remaining by day 4 (data not shown). S. epidermidis, often present on human skin, also grew well in artificial skin, reaching 8.7 log10 CFU 2 days after inoculation with 5.6 log10 CFU. Unlike KFCs infected with E. coli, foreskin cells appeared to remain grossly intact during infection with S. epidermidis (data not shown). Thus, H. ducreyi replication in the artificial skin model is modest by comparison with the other bacteria tested.

The data shown in Fig. 1 are total numbers of H. ducreyicells recovered from infected KFCs. To examine bacterial adherence to artificial skin squares, each sample was rinsed three times with PBS, and H. ducreyi in the wash and cell-associated fractions were quantitated separately (see Materials and Methods). Six hours after inoculation, there were more cell-associated bacteria than were recovered in the wash (mean log10 CFU/square ± standard deviations = 5.7 ± 0.1 versus 5.05 ± 0.1;P <0.001 [paired Student’s t test]). At all later times, recoveries from cell-associated and wash fractions were equivalent (data not shown).

H. ducreyi can invade suprabasal keratinocytes and cause basal cell cytotoxicity.Portions of artificial skin squares were prepared for light EM or 18 h after abrasion and inoculation with live or heat-killed H. ducreyi 35000. Using light microscopy, we saw aggregates of bacteria among the top layers of the stratum corneum in samples infected with live but not heat-killed bacteria (Fig. 2A and B). To further localize H. ducreyi within infected KFCs, we used TEM to examine the keratinocytes from the stratum corneum down to the basal layer and fibroblasts in the uppermost portion of the dermis. In samples embedded in Epon resin, occasional gram-negative bacteria were observed in suprabasal keratinocytes (Fig. 2C). The morphology of these bacteria was virtually identical to the morphology of control cultures of log-phase H. ducreyi processed and examined by EM (data not shown). In sections embedded in Lowicryl for immunoelectron microscopy, intracellular bacteria were labeled with anti-H. ducreyi rabbit antiserum (Fig. 2D) but not with normal rabbit serum (data not shown). Unlike the aggregates of bacteria observed in the uppermost layers of KFCs, intracellular H. ducreyiappeared as single cells. These organisms were rare (one or two organisms/tissue section) and did not appear to be contained in membrane-bound vacuoles.

  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Localization of H. ducreyi in infected artificial skin; light micrographs of hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained artificial skin squares 18 h after abrasion and inoculation with live (A) or heat-killed (B) H. ducreyi 35000. E, epidermis; D, dermis; bracket, basal keratinocyte region; arrowhead in panel A,H. ducreyi aggregates. (C and D) TEM of H. ducreyi-infected artificial skin 18 h after inoculation. SC, terminally differentiated keratinocytes of the stratum corneum; SqK, squamous keratinocyte; Hd, H. ducreyi; rectangle in panel C, area enlarged in inset. Sample in panel D was probed with anti-H. ducreyi antiserum, followed by gold-labeled secondary antibody. M, membrane of a squamous keratinocyte, two to three layers deep in the epidermis. Original magnifications: ×400 (A and B), ×3,000 (C), and ×12,900 (D); bars, 2.5 mm (C) and 0.19 mm (D).

In these studies, we did not identify H. ducreyi in or among basal keratinocytes, fibroblasts, or the extracellular material of the dermis 18 h after inoculation of abraded artificial skin. However, the architecture of the dermal-epidermal junction was dramatically altered as a result of infection with H. ducreyi 35000. We observed significant keratinocyte cytotoxicity in the basal cell region and in the lower layers of squamous epithelial cells 18 h after abraded KFCs were inoculated with live H. ducreyi, but not after abrasion and inoculation with heat-killed bacteria (Fig.3).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Dermal-epidermal junctions (arrows) of artificial skin 18 h after abrasion and inoculation with live (A) or heat-killed (B) H. ducreyi 35000. E, epidermis; BK, basal keratinocyte; F, fibroblast in dermis. Original magnification, ×2,550; bars, 3.9 mm.

Human foreskin cells secrete a unique pattern of cytokines in response to H. ducreyi infection in vitro.We replaced the 1 ml of medium beneath cell culture inserts at various times after inoculation and determined the concentrations of TNF-α, IL-1α, IL-6, and IL-8 released by KFCs in response to H. ducreyiinfection. Samples were collected from abraded artificial skin squares that had received live or heat-killed H. ducreyi, filtered supernatant from log-phase bacterial cultures, or BHI broth or were left untreated.

KFCs responded to H. ducreyi infection with increased secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 (Fig.4A and B). The levels of secreted IL-6 were elevated in control and experimental samples 6 h after inoculation. IL-6 levels remained high in samples infected with live H. ducreyi, while they returned to baseline by 48 h in samples from KFCs that had received heat-killed H. ducreyi, filtered bacterial culture fluid, or BHI broth or from untreated controls (Fig. 4A). Forty-eight hours after inoculation, infected samples secreted at least 6.9 times more IL-6 than any of the controls (P < 0.01 [unpaired Student’s t test]).

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Cytokine secretion by artificial skin in response toH. ducreyi infection; kinetics of IL-6 (A), IL-8 (B), and IL-1α (C) secretion. Open bars, abraded, uninoculated skin squares; other bars, skin squares inoculated with BHI broth (hatched bars),H. ducreyi culture supernatant (lightly shaded bars), heat-killed H. ducreyi (dotted bars), and live H. ducreyi (dark bars) following abrasion. Data are from two independent experiments. Results are means ± standard deviations determined from a total of five to nine individual samples per time point, each assayed in duplicate. ∗,P < 0.01 compared to all other samples at 48 h (unpaired Student’s t test).

The magnitude and kinetics of IL-8 secretion by infected KFCs were different from those of IL-6 secretion. IL-8 levels secreted at baseline were higher than IL-6 levels, and infected foreskin cells secreted three to five times more IL-8 than IL-6 at times ≥18 h after inoculation (notice the different y axis scales in Fig. 4A and B). IL-8 concentrations remained constant for all treatment groups and controls over the first 6 h and nearly doubled by 18 h after inoculation (Fig. 4B). IL-8 levels continued to increase in samples from KFCs infected with live H. ducreyi but returned to baseline by 48 h for all other samples. Infected foreskin cells secreted at least 3.2 times more IL-8 than any of the controls (P < 0.01 [unpaired Student’s t test]) 48 h after inoculation. Because the culture fluid beneath KFCs was removed and replaced with fresh medium at each time point, cytokine concentrations represent active secretion over the course of these experiments rather than accumulation and persistence of material released at early time points.

TNF-α levels in samples collected before inoculation and at 6, 18, or 48 h after inoculation ranged from ≤4.4 to 11.8 pg/ml, with no differences between experimental treatment groups and untreated abraded controls at any time point (n = 17). That KFCs were capable of TNF-α secretion was demonstrated by high levels of TNF-α in samples collected 24 h after inoculation with E. coli (273.2 pg/ml) and 48 h after inoculation with S. epidermidis (246.5 pg/ml).

KFCs released IL-1α over the first 6 h after inoculation in response to the abrasion technique; no experimental treatment elicited increased IL-1α secretion compared to untreated (but abraded) controls (Fig. 4C). By 18 h after inoculation, secreted IL-1α levels returned to baseline for all samples. The capacity for high level IL-1α secretion by foreskin cells in this model was demonstrated by their response to E. coli with 848.3 pg of IL-1α/ml 24 h after inoculation. Thus, KFCs released neither TNF-α nor IL-1α in response to H. ducreyi infection in vitro. However, the trauma of abrasion immediately prior to inoculation caused a peak of IL-1α secretion 6 h later.

DISCUSSION

Understanding the molecular mechanisms responsible for diseases caused by strict human pathogens such as H. ducreyi requires relevant in vitro models of infection. The development of increasingly sophisticated in vitro cell culture techniques has improved the approximation of human epithelial surfaces over standard cell monolayer cultures. We have used an artificial skin model, composed of normal human foreskin keratinocytes and fibroblasts, as a substrate forH. ducreyi infection. Artificial skin is a complex tissue with epidermal and dermal compartments separated by a well-developed basal lamina (13). Morphological and biochemical characterization indicate that this model recreates many of the structural and functional features of skin in vivo, including maintenance of a selective permeability barrier and cutaneous metabolic activity (50). Thus, the host cell cytokine responses toH. ducreyi infection in artificial skin and the behavior of the bacteria in this model may parallel critical steps in the pathogenesis of chancroid.

H. ducreyi infection of human foreskin KFCs stimulated increased secretion of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-8, but not IL-1α and TNF-α. The potent PMN chemoattractant activity of IL-8 is thought to be largely responsible for the local accumulation of inflammatory neutrophils, a hallmark of chancroid ulcers caused byH. ducreyi (20, 29). In psoriasis, an inflammatory skin disease, IL-8 production by keratinocytes is elevated in lesions in which it contributes to hyperproliferation of these cells (21). Similarly, acanthosis is a characteristic feature of the epidermis surrounding chancroid lesions (49). Our studies suggest that the chemoattractant and mitogenic properties of IL-8 produced by skin cells in response to H. ducreyiinfection may be involved in chancroid ulcer development.

IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine produced by a variety of cells including keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Like IL-8, IL-6 stimulates keratinocyte proliferation, and it induces IL-2 and IL-2 receptor expression in T cells (33, 62). IL-2 expression is associated with a T-helper cell 1 (TH1)-type CD4 T-cell response; preliminary evidence from clinical observations and experimental H. ducreyiinfection suggests that TH1 responses may predominate during the initial stages of chancroid. Soluble IL-2 receptors are elevated in the urine of chancroid patients (1), and gamma interferon mRNA, also a TH1-type cytokine, has been observed in experimental lesions in humans (52). Although the immune cells that produce these cytokines are absent from the artificial skin model used in the present studies, IL-6 and IL-8 released by keratinocytes and/or fibroblasts in response to H. ducreyi infection could be early signals resulting in the recruitment of PMNs and CD4 T cells to chancroid lesions.

The observation that differences between cytokines induced by liveH. ducreyi and control preparations did not appear until 48 h after inoculation suggests that there may be environmental control of the H. ducreyi factors required for the cytokine induction seen. Future experiments comparing bacterial gene expression in the presence and absence of skin cells may identify important virulence factors required for chancroid ulcer production.

The relative lack of TNF-α and IL-1α responses in our studies was unexpected, since these two cytokines play a central role in initiating inflammatory responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and microbial infection. IL-1α and TNF-α are potent inducers of IL-8, and increased production of both cytokines in keratinocyte-fibroblast cocultures in response to other stimuli (17) suggested that they could have been involved in skin cell responses to H. ducreyi infection. We did not observe TNF-α levels above baseline in response to inoculation with live or heat-killed H. ducreyi, bacterial culture supernatant, or BHI broth. Suppression of TNF-α expression in macrophages has recently been attributed to YopB, a plasmid-encoded outer membrane protein of Yersinia enterocolitica (7). H. ducreyi may utilize a similar evasion strategy against this component of the mucosal epithelial defense system. Alternatively, H. ducreyi may simply fail to trigger a TNF-α response in foreskin keratinocytes or fibroblasts. The H. ducreyi outer membrane contains LOS lacking the extensive saccharide side chains found in the LPS of gram-negative enteric bacteria (46). This structural difference may account for the lack of TNF-α secretion in our experiments. Indeed, E. coli dramatically stimulated TNF-α secretion in KFCs. Future studies with purified H. ducreyiLOS as a stimulus in the artificial skin model may address this issue.

In our studies of H. ducreyi infection of artificial skin, we noted a greater-than-20-fold increase in IL-1α secretion by KFCs over the first 6 h after inoculation (Fig. 4). This elevation did not require live H. ducreyi and appeared to be in response to the abrasion required to produce a productive infection in vitro. The nonspecific nature of increased IL-1α production in our studies does not rule out a role for this cytokine in the host response to chancroid. In naturally acquired and experimental chancroid, H. ducreyi requires breaks in the epidermis to enter the skin and cause infection (27, 38, 43, 53, 59).

Initially, we were uncertain of the barrier properties of artificial foreskin cell cultures with respect to H. ducreyi infection. In preliminary experiments, KFCs were painted with a pipette tip as the inoculum was dispensed evenly over the surface of the tissue square. Alternatively, inocula were allowed to drop onto squares without mechanically perturbing the surface. Cytokine responses of KFCs inoculated by the painting method were erratic, with discordant levels in replicate samples in the same treatment groups (data not shown). This result suggested that abrasion resulting from contact of the pipette tip with the surface of KFCs during inoculation was inadequate, since samples were not uniformly affected. That abrasion was required in the model was demonstrated by the relative lack of cytokine responses in KFCs inoculated by the drop method (data not shown).

The cytokine responses described herein resulted from uniform abrasion of the artificial skin surface immediately prior to inoculation, designed to approximate epidermal abrasions that occur during sexual intercourse. Our results suggest that relatively low levels of IL-1α may be present in genital skin as a result of such breaks in the epithelium. IL-1α induces physiologic responses at much lower concentrations (1 to 10 pg/ml) than other proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-8 (>10 ng/ml) (5). Thus, keratinocyte- or fibroblast-derived IL-1α may contribute to the cutaneous cytokine response to H. ducreyi infection in vivo.

The keratinocyte-fibroblast coculture system used in our studies recreates many of the structural and functional features of skin; however, it lacks key features of intact human skin that contribute to its immune functions in vivo. For example, Langerhans cells, potent antigen-presenting dendritic cells, are absent from the engineered epidermis and dermis. Langerhans cells play a critical role in cutaneous immune responses and have been shown to produce TNF, IL-1, IL-6, and IL-8 (12, 15, 18, 22, 54). The absence of peripheral blood-derived and resident skin leukocytes obviously reduces the complexity of the observable cytokine network, since PMNs, macrophages, and T cells are key components of the host immune response to H. ducreyi infection (38, 52). The cytokine responses documented here are only the potential contributions of foreskin keratinocytes and fibroblasts and thus represent a subset of the cutaneous immune response to H. ducreyi infection. Nevertheless, these are the predominant cell types in human skin, and keratinocytes are probably the first host cells with which H. ducreyi comes in contact during the initial stages of infection. Reconstitution of the current coculture system with dendritic cells, neutrophils, and/or lymphocytes may improve the model for use in defining and understanding the cytokine and ensuing cellular responses involved in chancroid ulcer formation.

The location of H. ducreyi within chancroid ulcers has not been well-characterized. Organisms can be recovered from clinical and experimental lesions of several days’ to several weeks’ duration (23, 43, 53) and are thus present in developing and mature lesions. Consistent with these observations, we recovered H. ducreyi from infected artificial skin at times ranging from 6 h to 2 weeks after inoculation. Early microscopic studies of chancroid biopsies occasionally demonstrated chains of bacilli located extracellularly at the base of ulcers (20, 35). We observed chains of H. ducreyi among the keratin layers on the surface of infected keratinocyte-fibroblast cocultures 18 h after inoculation. Many of these bacteria were only loosely associated with artificial skin, since we consistently recovered equivalent numbers of bacteria in the wash and cell-associated fractions ≥18 h after inoculation. These tangles of H. ducreyi are reminiscent of the microcolonies described by Alfa and colleagues (3, 4) and Lammel et al. (32) on the surface of infected fibroblast monolayers; however, we did not observe bacteria in the dermis, where fibroblasts are located in this model.

In addition to the surface bacteria, we observed H. ducreyiwithin suprabasal keratinocytes 18 h after inoculation. These bacteria were consistent in size and shape with reported characteristics of Ducrey’s bacillus. The range of variation in size is 0.5 to 2.5 mm long by 0.3 to 1.0 mm broad, and the organism is “frequently constricted in the middle” (26). The mottled interior of the organisms in artificial skin is typical of H. ducreyi (Fig. 2). Intracellular H. ducreyi cells were rare and were seen only as single longitudinal or cross-sections that appeared to be free in the keratinocyte cytoplasm (Fig. 2). The apparent paucity of H. ducreyi below the surface of infected artificial skin is consistent with the relatively low numbers of organisms recovered from lesions in experimental human infections (52, 53). Keratinocytes containing bacteria were typically three to four layers deep in the epidermis and two to three layers above the basal keratinocytes.

We did not see H. ducreyi in the basal keratinocyte region of infected artificial skin. Nevertheless, 18 h after abrasion and inoculation with live but not heat-killed bacteria, the architecture of the basal cell layer was disrupted and the keratinocytes appeared necrotic. This disruption was localized to the basal cell region, as suprabasal keratinocytes were grossly unaffected by infection and the overall architecture of the epidermal compartment remained intact (Fig.2A and B). H. ducreyi elaborates several toxins that may be important virulence factors for ulcer formation. A bacterial cell-associated hemolysin belonging to the Proteus-Serratiafamily of pore-forming toxins has been characterized by Palmer et al. (41) and Totten et al. (60). Toxic activity of the H. ducreyi hemolysin requires bacterial contact with host target cells and is relatively specific for fibroblasts in vitro (41). The structural changes that we observed at the dermal-epidermal junction of H. ducreyi-infected artificial skin were probably not caused by the hemolysin, since bacteria were not evident in the zones of destruction. H. ducreyi also produces a secreted cytotoxin with homology to the cytolethal distending toxins (CDTs) of E. coli (47) andCampylobacter species (42). The H. ducreyi CDT is active against HeLa cells in vitro (14); its relative toxicity for keratinocytes and fibroblasts has not yet been described. Given its potential for activity at a distance from bacterial cells and the sensitivity of at least some epithelial cells to the toxin, the soluble H. ducreyi CDT may be responsible for the cytotoxicity that we noted at the basal keratinocyte layer of infected KFCs. Experiments with toxin-deficient mutants in the artificial foreskin model of infection should provide further information on the role of CDT in H. ducreyi virulence.

The artificial human skin model described here provides a relevant in vitro system for studying the pathogenesis of H. ducreyiinfection. Using the in vitro skin model, we intend to characterize the pathogenic potential of defined H. ducreyi mutants to identify virulence factors important in the development of chancroid ulcers.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Public Health Service grants 1F32 AI09496 to M.M.H. and U01 AI31496 to the North Carolina Sexually Transmitted Diseases Center and a University of North Carolina Faculty Research grant to T.H.K.

We are grateful to Vicki Madden and Robert Bagnell of the Pathology Electron Microscopy Core Facility for assistance with sample processing and use of the TEM and to Johnny Carson of the Department of Pediatrics Electron Microscopy Core Facility for use of the TEM. We thank Lani San Mateo and Myron S. Cohen for critically reviewing the manuscript.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 5 February 1998.
    • Accepted 17 March 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Abeck D.,
    2. Korting H. C.,
    3. Zaba R.,
    4. Dangor Y.,
    5. Fehler G.,
    6. Ballard R. C.
    Soluble interleukin-2 receptors in serum and urine of patients with chancroid and their response to therapy. Int. J. Sex. Transm. Dis. AIDS 1 1990 282 284
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.↵
    1. Alfa M. J.
    Cytopathic effect of Haemophilus ducreyi for human foreskin cell culture. J. Med. Microbiol. 37 1992 43 50
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Alfa M. J.,
    2. DeGagne P.,
    3. Hollyer T.
    Haemophilus ducreyi adheres to but does not invade cultured human foreskin cells. Infect. Immun. 61 1993 1735 1742
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Alfa M. J.,
    2. Stevens M. K.,
    3. DeGagne P.,
    4. Klesney-Tait J.,
    5. Radolf J. D.,
    6. Hansen E. J.
    Use of tissue culture and animal models to identify virulence-associated traits of Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 63 1995 1754 1761
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Baggliolini M.,
    2. Dewald B.,
    3. Moser B.
    Interleukin-8 and related chemotactic cytokines—CxC and CC chemokines. Adv. Immunol. 55 1994 97 179
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Becker T. M.,
    2. DeWitt W.,
    3. Van Dusen G.
    Haemophilus ducreyi infection in south Florida: a rare disease on the rise? South. Med. J. 80 1987 182 184
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Beuscher H. U.,
    2. Rodel F.,
    3. Forsberg A.,
    4. Rollinghoff M.
    Bacteria evasion of host immune defense: Yersinia enterocolitica encodes a supressor for tumor necrosis factor alpha expression. Infect. Immun. 63 1995 1270 1277
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Blackmore C. A.,
    2. Limpakarnjanarat K.,
    3. Rigau-Perez J. G.,
    4. Albritton W. L.,
    5. Greenwood J. R.
    An outbreak of chancroid in Orange County, California: descriptive epidemiology and disease-control measures. J. Infect. Dis. 151 1985 840 844
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Brentjens R. J.,
    2. Ketterer M.,
    3. Apicella M. A.,
    4. Spinola S. M.
    Fine tangled pili expressed by Haemophilus ducreyi are a novel class of pili. J. Bacteriol. 178 1996 808 816
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Brentjens R. J.,
    2. Spinola S. M.,
    3. Campagnari A. A.
    Haemophilus ducreyi adheres to human keratinocytes. Microb. Pathog. 16 1994 243 247
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Campagnari A. A.,
    2. Wild L. M.,
    3. Griffiths G. E.,
    4. Karalus R. J.,
    5. Wirth M. A.,
    6. Spinola S. M.
    Role of lipooligosaccharides in experimental dermal lesions caused by Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 59 1991 2601 2608
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Caux C.,
    2. Massacrier C.,
    3. Vandervliet B.,
    4. Dubois B.,
    5. Van Kooten C.,
    6. Durand I.,
    7. Banchereau J.
    Activation of human dendritic cells through CD40 cross-linking. J. Exp. Med. 180 1994 1263 1272
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Contard P.,
    2. Bartel T. L.,
    3. Jacobs L. II,
    4. Perlish J. S.,
    5. MacDonald E. D. II,
    6. Handler L.,
    7. Cone D.,
    8. Fleishmajer R.
    Culturing keratinocytes and fibroblasts in a three-dimensional mesh results in epidermal and formation of a basal lamina-anchoring zone. J. Invest. Dermatol. 100 1993 35 39
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Cope L. D.,
    2. Lumbley S.,
    3. Latimer J. L.,
    4. Klesney-Tait J.,
    5. Stevens M. K.,
    6. Johnson L. S.,
    7. Purven M.,
    8. Munson R. S. Jr.,
    9. Lagergard T.,
    10. Radolf J. D.,
    11. Hansen E. J.
    A diffusible cytotoxin of Haemophilus ducreyi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94 1997 4056 4061
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Cumberbatch M.,
    2. Dearman R. J.,
    3. Kimber I.
    Constitutive and inducible expression of interleukin-6 by Langerhans cells and lymph node dendritic cells. Immunology 87 1996 513 518
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. DiCarlo R. P.,
    2. Armentor B. S.,
    3. Martin D. H.
    Chancroid epidemiology in New Orleans men. J. Infect. Dis. 172 1995 446 452
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Edwards S. M.,
    2. Donnelly T. A.,
    3. Sayre R. M.,
    4. Rheins L. A.,
    5. Spielmann H.,
    6. Liebsch M.
    Quantitative in vitro assessment of phototoxicity using a human skin model, Skin2. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 10 1994 111 117
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    1. Enk A. H.,
    2. Angeloni V. L.,
    3. Udey M. C.,
    4. Katz S. I.
    An essential role for Langerhans cell-derived IL-1 beta in the initiation of primary immune responses in skin. J. Immunol. 150 1993 3698 3704
    OpenUrlAbstract
  19. 19.↵
    1. Farris J. R.,
    2. Hutcheson D.,
    3. Cartwright G.,
    4. Glover J. H.
    Chancroid in Dallas: new lessons from an old disease. Tex. Med. 87 1991 78 81
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Freinkel A. L.
    Histological aspects of sexually transmitted genital lesions. Histopathology 11 1987 819 831
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gearing A. J. H.,
    2. Fincham N. J.,
    3. Bird C. R.,
    4. Wadhwa M.,
    5. Meager A.,
    6. Cartwright J. E.,
    7. Camp R. D. R.
    Cytokines in skin lesions of psoriasis. Cytokine 2 1990 68 75
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Groves R. W.,
    2. Allen M. H.,
    3. Ross E. L.,
    4. Barker J. N.,
    5. MacDonald D. M.
    Tumour necrosis factor alpha is pro-inflammatory in normal human skin and modulates cutaneous adhesion molecule expression. Br. J. Dermatol. 132 1995 345 352
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Hammond G. W.
    A history of the detection of Haemophilus ducreyi, 1889–1979. Sex. Transm. Dis. 23 1996 93 96
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hammond G. W.,
    2. Lian C. J.,
    3. Wilt J. C.,
    4. Ronald A. R.
    Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus ducreyi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13 1978 608 612
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hansen E. J.,
    2. Lumbley S. R.,
    3. Richardson J. A.,
    4. Purcell B. K.,
    5. Stevens M. K.,
    6. Cope L. D.,
    7. Datte J.,
    8. Radolf J. D.
    Induction of protective immunity to Haemophilus ducreyi in the temperature-dependent rabbit model of experimental chancroid. J. Immunol. 152 1994 184 192
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hewlett R. T.
    Chancroid and Bacillus ducreyii and other organisms A system of bacteriology in relation to medicine Fildes P., Ledingham J. C. G. 2 1929 411 416 His Majesty’s Stationery Office London, United Kingdom
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hobbs M. M.,
    2. San Mateo L. R.,
    3. Orndorff P. E.,
    4. Almond G.,
    5. Kawula T. H.
    Swine model of Haemophilus ducreyi infection. Infect. Immun. 63 1995 3094 3100
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Joseph T. D.,
    2. Bose S. K.
    A heat-labile protein of Chlamydia trachomatis binds to HeLa cells and inhibits the adherence of chlamydiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 1991 4054 4058
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. King R.,
    2. Gough J.,
    3. Ronald A.,
    4. Nasio J.,
    5. Ndinya-Achola J. O.,
    6. Plummer F.,
    7. Wilkins J. A.
    An immunohistochemical analysis of naturally occurring chancroid. J. Infect. Dis. 174 1996 427 430
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Lagergard T.
    The role of Haemophilus ducreyi bacteria, cytotoxin, endotoxin and antibodies in animal models for study of chancroid. Microb. Pathog. 13 1992 203 217
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Lagergard T.,
    2. Purven M.,
    3. Frisk A.
    Evidence of Haemophilus ducreyi adherence to and cytotoxin destruction of human epithelial cells. Microb. Pathog. 14 1993 417 431
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Lammel C. J.,
    2. Dekker N. P.,
    3. Palefsky J.,
    4. Brooks G. F.
    In vitro model of Haemophilus ducreyi adherence to and entry into eukaryotic cells of genital origin. J. Infect. Dis. 167 1993 642 650
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Lotz M.,
    2. Jirik F.,
    3. Kabouridis P.,
    4. Tsoukas C.,
    5. Hirano T.,
    6. Kishimoto T.,
    7. Carson D. A.
    B cell stimulating factor 2/interleukin 6 is a costimulant for human thymocytes and T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 167 1988 1253 1258
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Manoil C.,
    2. Beckwith J.
    TnphoA; a transposon probe for protein export signals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82 1985 8129 8133
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Marsch W. C.,
    2. Haas N.,
    3. Stuttgen G.
    Ultrastructural detection of Haemophilus ducreyi in biopsies of chancroid. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 263 1978 153 157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. 36.↵
    1. Martin D. H.,
    2. DiCarlo R. P.
    Recent changes in the epidemiology of genital ulcer disease in the United States. The crack cocaine connection. Sex. Transm. Dis. 21 1994 S76 S80
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Mauff A. C.,
    2. Ballard R. C.,
    3. Bilgeri Y. R.,
    4. Koornhof H. J.
    Isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi from genital ulcerations in white men in Johannesburg. S. Afr. Med. J. 63 1983 236 237
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Morse S. A.
    Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2 1989 137 157
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Naughton G. K.,
    2. Jacob L.,
    3. Naughton B. A.
    A physiological skin model for in vitro toxicity studies Alternative methods in toxicology. Goldberg A. M. 1989 183 187 Mary Ann Leibert New York, N.Y
  40. 40.↵
    1. Nzila N.,
    2. Laga M.,
    3. Thiam M. A.,
    4. Mayimona K.,
    5. Edidi B.,
    6. Van Dyck E.,
    7. Behets F.,
    8. Hassig S.,
    9. Nelson A.,
    10. Mokwa K.
    HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases among female prostitutes in Kinshasa. AIDS 5 1991 715 721
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Palmer K. L.,
    2. Goldman W. E.,
    3. Munson R. S. Jr.
    An isogenic haemolysin-deficient mutant of Haemophilus ducreyi lacks the ability to produce cytopathic effects on human foreskin fibroblasts. Mol. Microbiol. 21 1996 13 19
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Pickett C. L.,
    2. Pesci E. C.,
    3. Cottle D. L.,
    4. Russell G.,
    5. Erdem A. N.,
    6. Zeytin H.
    Prevalence of cytolethal distending toxin production in Campylobacter jejuni and relatedness of Campylobacter sp. cdtB gene. Infect. Immun. 6 1996 2070 2078
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.↵
    1. Purcell B. K.,
    2. Richardson J. A.,
    3. Radolf J. D.,
    4. Hansen E. J.
    A temperature-dependent rabbit model for production of dermal lesions by Haemophilus ducreyi. J. Infect. Dis. 164 1991 359 367
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    1. Purven M.,
    2. Falsen E.,
    3. Lagergard T.
    Cytotoxin production in 100 strains of Haemophilus ducreyi from different geographic locations. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 129 1995 221 224
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Schmid G. P.,
    2. Faur Y. C.,
    3. Valu J. A.,
    4. Sikandar S. A.,
    5. McLaughlin M. M.
    Enhanced recovery of Haemophilus ducreyi from clinical specimens by incubation at 33 versus 35 degrees C. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33 1995 3257 3259
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Schweda E. K.,
    2. Jonasson J. A.,
    3. Jansson P. E.
    Structural studies of lipooligosaccharides from Haemophilus ducreyi ITM 5535, ITM 3147, and a fresh clinical isolate, ACY1: evidence for intrastrain heterogeneity with the production of mutually exclusive sialylated or elongated glycoforms. J. Bacteriol. 177 1995 5316 5321
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Scott D. A.,
    2. Kaper J. B.
    Cloning and sequencing of the genes encoding Escherichia coli cytolethal distending toxin. Infect. Immun. 62 1994 244 251
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Shaw J. H.,
    2. Falkow S.
    Model for invasion of human tissue culture cells by Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Infect. Immun. 56 1988 1625 1632
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Sheldon W. H.,
    2. Heyman A.
    Studies on chancroid. Am. J. Pathol. 22 1945 415 425
    OpenUrl
  50. 50.↵
    1. Slivka S. R.,
    2. Landeen L. K.,
    3. Zeigler F.,
    4. Zimber M. P.,
    5. Bartel R. L.
    Characterization, barrier functions, and drug metabolism of an in vitro skin model. J. Invest. Dermatol. 100 1993 40 46
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Slivka S. R.,
    2. Zeigler F.,
    3. Landeen L.,
    4. Bartel R. L.
    Keratinocytes modulate extracellular matrix deposition in a novel dermal model. J. Invest. Dermatol. 98 1992 621A
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    1. Spinola S. M.,
    2. Orazi A.,
    3. Arno J. N.,
    4. Fortney K.,
    5. Kotylo P.,
    6. Chen C. Y.,
    7. Campagnari A. A.,
    8. Hood A. F.
    Haemophilus ducreyi elicits a cutaneous infiltrate of CD4 cells during experimental human infection. J. Infect. Dis. 173 1996 394 402
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Spinola S. M.,
    2. Wild L. M.,
    3. Apicella M. A.,
    4. Gaspari A. A.,
    5. Campagnari A. A.
    Experimental human infection with Haemophilus ducreyi. J. Infect. Dis. 169 1994 1146 1150
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Srivastava B. I.,
    2. Srivastava A.,
    3. Srivastava M. D.
    Phenotype, genotype and cytokine production in acute leukemia involving progenitors of dendritic Langerhans’ cells. Leuk. Res. 18 1994 499 511
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. 55.↵
    1. Stoppie P.,
    2. Borghgraef P.,
    3. De Wever B.,
    4. Geysen J.,
    5. Borgers M.
    The epidermal architecture of an in vitro reconstructed human skin equivalent (Advanced Tissue Sciences Skin2 models ZK 1300/2000). Eur. J. Morphol. 31 1993 26 29
    OpenUrlPubMed
  56. 56.↵
    1. Taniguchi Y.,
    2. Suzuki K.,
    3. Nakajima K.,
    4. Nakajima M.,
    5. Miwa Y.,
    6. Yamada Y.,
    7. Satoh M.,
    8. Takeyoshi M.,
    9. Akie Y.,
    10. Moriyasu M.
    Inter-laboratory validation study of the Skin2 Dermal model ZK1100 and MTT cytotoxicity assay kits. J. Toxicol. Sci. 19 1994 37 44
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Thomas D. D.,
    2. Higbie L. M.
    In vitro association of leptospires with host cells. Infect. Immun. 58 1990 581 585
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 58.↵
    1. Totten P. A.,
    2. Lara J. C.,
    3. Norn D. V.,
    4. Stamm W. E.
    Haemophilus ducreyi attaches to and invades human epithelial cells in vitro. Infect. Immun. 62 1994 5632 5640
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. 59.↵
    1. Totten P. A.,
    2. Morton W. R.,
    3. Knitter G. H.,
    4. Clark A. M.,
    5. Kiviat N. B.,
    6. Stamm W. E.
    A primate model for chancroid. J. Infect. Dis. 169 1994 1284 1290
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    1. Totten P. A.,
    2. Norn D. V.,
    3. Stamm W. E.
    Characterization of the hemolytic activity of Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 63 1995 4409 4416
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Trees D. L.,
    2. Morse S. A.
    Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi: an update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8 1995 357 375
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. Uyttenhove C.,
    2. Coulie P. G.,
    3. Van Snick J.
    T cell growth and differentiation induced by interleukin-HP1/IL-6, the murine hybridoma/plasmacytoma growth factor. J. Exp. Med 167 1988 1417 1427
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Vickers A. E.,
    2. Biggi W. A.,
    3. Dannecker R.,
    4. Fischer V.
    Uptake and metabolism of cyclosporin A and SDZ IMM 125 in the human in vitro skin2 dermal and barrier function models. Life Sci. 57 1995 215 224
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. 64.↵
    1. Wyrick P. B.,
    2. Choong J.,
    3. Knight S. T.,
    4. Goyeau D.,
    5. Stuart E. S.,
    6. MacDonald A. B.
    Chlamydia trachomatis antigens on the surface of infected human endometrial epithelial cells. Immunol. Infect. Dis. 4 1994 131 141
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Haemophilus ducreyi Infection Causes Basal Keratinocyte Cytotoxicity and Elicits a Unique Cytokine Induction Pattern in an In Vitro Human Skin Model
Marcia M. Hobbs, Terry R. Paul, Priscilla B. Wyrick, Thomas H. Kawula
Infection and Immunity Jun 1998, 66 (6) 2914-2921; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.6.2914-2921.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Haemophilus ducreyi Infection Causes Basal Keratinocyte Cytotoxicity and Elicits a Unique Cytokine Induction Pattern in an In Vitro Human Skin Model
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Haemophilus ducreyi Infection Causes Basal Keratinocyte Cytotoxicity and Elicits a Unique Cytokine Induction Pattern in an In Vitro Human Skin Model
Marcia M. Hobbs, Terry R. Paul, Priscilla B. Wyrick, Thomas H. Kawula
Infection and Immunity Jun 1998, 66 (6) 2914-2921; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.6.2914-2921.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

cytokines
Haemophilus ducreyi
keratinocytes
skin

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522