Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacterial Infections

Factors Affecting the Collagen Binding Capacity ofStaphylococcus aureus

Allison F. Gillaspy, Chia Y. Lee, Subrata Sau, Ambrose L. Cheung, Mark S. Smeltzer
Allison F. Gillaspy
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chia Y. Lee
Department of Microbiology, Molecular Genetics and Immunology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Subrata Sau
Department of Microbiology, Molecular Genetics and Immunology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ambrose L. Cheung
Laboratory of Bacteriology and Immunology, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark S. Smeltzer
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.7.3170-3178.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

To determine whether the ability of Staphylococcus aureus to bind collagen involves an adhesin other than the collagen adhesin encoded by cna, we examined the collagen binding capacity (CBC) of 32 strains of S. aureus. With only two exceptions, a high CBC corresponded with the presence ofcna. Both exceptions involved cna-positive strains with a low CBC. The first was a single strain (ACH5) that encoded but did not express cna. The second were the mucoid strains Smith diffuse and M, both of which encoded and expressedcna but bound only minimal amounts of collagen. Analysis of capsule mutants suggests that the reduced CBC observed in the mucoid strains was due to masking of the collagen adhesin on the cell surface and that this masking effect is restricted to heavily encapsulated strains. Differences in the CBC of the remainingcna-positive strains were correlated to variations in the level of cna transcription and were independent of the number of B domain repeats in the cna gene. In allcna-positive strains other than ACH5, cnatranscription was temporally regulated, with cna mRNA levels being highest in cells taken from exponentially growing cultures and falling to almost undetectable levels as cultures entered the post-exponential growth phase. The CBC was also highest with cells taken from exponentially growing cultures. Mutation of agrresulted in a slight increase in cna transcription and a corresponding increase in CBC during the exponential growth phase but did not affect the temporal pattern of cna transcription. Mutation of sar resulted in a more dramatic increase in CBC and a delay in the post-exponential-phase repression of cnatranscription. Mutation of both sar and agr had an additive effect on both CBC and cna transcription. We conclude that (i) cna encodes the primary collagen-binding adhesin in S. aureus, (ii) sar is the primary regulatory element controlling expression of cna, and (iii) the regulatory effects of sar and agr oncna transcription are independent of the interaction between sar and agr.

Staphylococcus aureusbinds a number of host proteins, including fibronectin, laminin, vitronectin, fibrinogen, collagen, thrombospondin, elastin, osteopontin and bone sialoprotein (26). The S. aureusadhesins responsible for this binding have been termed MSCRAMMs to denote their role as microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (26). Genes encoding MSCRAMMs that bind fibronectin (fnbA and fnbB), fibrinogen (fib, clfA, and fbpA), elastin (ebpS), and collagen (cna) have been identified (26). Each of these genes encodes an adhesin with apparent specificity for a single host protein. In contrast, mapappears to encode a broad-specificity MSCRAMM that mediates the low-level binding of several host proteins, including bone sialoprotein, fibronectin, fibrinogen, vitronectin, thrombospondin, collagen and osteopontin (15, 21). We recently demonstrated that map is encoded by most and possibly all S. aureus strains (33). fib, clfA,ebpS, and at least one of the two fnb genes are also highly conserved. In contrast, the collagen adhesin gene (cna) is relatively rare, being present in only 10 of the 25 strains that we examined (33).

Because cna is the only recognized S. aureus gene that encodes an adhesin that specifically binds collagen (30), the observation that most strains do not encodecna (33) suggests that most strains do not bind collagen. That inference is consistent with earlier surveys of S. aureus isolates (36) and is supported by the observation that mutation of cna in S. aureusPhillips eliminated the ability to bind collagen (28). However, cna mutagenesis has not been done in any strain other than Phillips, and it remains possible that at least somecna-negative S. aureus strains bind collagen either by virtue of the enhanced expression of a broad-specificity adhesin like Map or the presence of a collagen-binding MSCRAMM other than cna. Indeed, Nilsson et al. (22) reported that mutation of the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sar) in S. aureus DB resulted in a 16-fold enhancement in the capacity to bind type II collagen despite the fact that DB does not encode cna.

Identification and characterization of the S. aureusadhesins that contribute to collagen binding is important in light of the fact that S. aureus strains that cause musculoskeletal infections (e.g., septic arthritis and osteomyelitis) almost invariably bind collagen (2, 13, 26). This correlation suggests that therapeutic strategies aimed at the inhibition of collagen binding might be useful for the prevention and treatment of musculoskeletal infection. However, the development of such strategies will require a clear understanding of the bacterial factors that contribute to collagen binding. To that end, we characterized 32 strains of S. aureus with respect to their collagen binding capacity (CBC) and the presence and expression of cna. Our results indicate that (i) cna encodes the only S. aureus MSCRAMM that mediates the high-level binding of collagen, (ii) variations in CBC among cna-positive strains are due to capsule production and/or variations in the level of cna transcription and are independent of B-domain variations within the collagen adhesin itself, (iii) cna transcription is temporally regulated in a manner that is at least partially dependent on the sar regulatory locus, and (iv) the regulatory effects of sar oncna transcription are independent of the interaction betweensar and agr.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.TheS. aureus strains used in this study are summarized in Table1. Because the prototypical 8325-4 strain of S. aureus does not encode cna (33), we introduced cna into a representative 8325-4 strain (RN6390) and a sar mutant derived from RN6390 (SarR) (5). The cna gene was introduced both by transformation with a plasmid containing the FDA574 cna gene cloned into pLI50 (pLI50::cna) and by Φ11-mediated transduction from CYL574 (28). The latter results in the introduction of cna into the chromosomal lipase (geh) gene (geh::cna). Transformants were selected by plating on tryptic soy agar (TSA) containing 10 μg of chloramphenicol per ml and confirmed by plasmid profile analysis (data not shown). Transductants were selected on TSA containing 5 μg of tetracycline per ml and confirmed by Southern blot using cnaand geh probes (data not shown). The RN6390 (geh::cna) and SarR (geh::cna) derivatives were designated UAMS-174 and UAMS-175, respectively (Table 1). We also generatedagr-null mutants of UAMS-174 and UAMS-175 by Φ11-mediated transduction using RN6911 (23) as a donor strain. Transductants were selected on TSA containing 2 μg of minocycline per ml and confirmed by Southern blot using cna, agr, and sar probes (data not shown). The agr-null mutants of UAMS-174 and UAMS-175 were designated UAMS-171 and UAMS-172, respectively (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Strains used

Capsule-deficient mutants of the cna-positive, serotype 8 strains Becker and UAMS-1 were generated by allele replacement mutagenesis. The DNA region encoding the cap8 gene cluster required for capsule biosynthesis has been cloned and sequenced (31). A derivative of Becker (CYL5972) with most of thecap8 gene cluster deleted was constructed by using the temperature-sensitive delivery vector pCL52.1 (19). Briefly, a 3.8-kb SalI fragment containing cap8A,cap8B′, and approximately 2.6 kb of the DNA upstream of thecap8A gene was ligated to a 4.4-kb SalI fragment containing cap8O, cap8P, and approximately 2.0 kb downstream of the cap8P gene. The ligated fragment was cloned into the multiple cloning site of pCL52.1 to form pCL7842. The two fragments were shown by restriction enzyme digestion to be oriented in the same manner as found in the wild-type chromosome (data not shown). pCL7842 was used to transform S. aureus RN4220 and was then transduced from RN4220 into Becker by using phage 52A (19). RN4220 transformants and Becker transductants were isolated at the permissive temperature of 30°C. After a shift to the nonpermissive temperature (43°C) and selection for episomal integrants, a mutant (CYL5972) in which the plasmid had excised from the chromosome, leaving the deleted version of the cap8 gene cluster, was isolated and verified as previously described (19).

To construct the UAMS-1 cap8 deletion mutant (CYL6194), plasmid pCL7960 was constructed by cloning three DNA fragments in tandem into the multiple cloning site of pCL52.1. The three fragments consisted of (i) a 3.2-kb EcoRI-SalI fragment containing cap8B, cap8C, cap8D, andcap8E′, (ii) a 1.7-kb Sau3A fragment containing the chloramphenicol resistance gene (cat) from pC194 (14), and (iii) a 4.4-kb SalI fragment containingcap8O, cap8P, and approximately 2.0 kb of DNA downstream from the cap8P gene. The three fragments were ligated in such a way that the cat gene was flanked by the two cap8 gene fragments in the same orientation found in the chromosome. The resulting plasmid (pCL7960) was transformed into RN4220 and then transduced into UAMS-1 as described above. After a shift to the nonpermissive temperature, derivatives of UAMS-1 containingcat were identified by plating on medium containing chloramphenicol. The fact that the intact cap8 gene cluster in one of these (CYL6194) was replaced by the cap8-catconstruct was confirmed by Southern blotting (data not shown). The capsule-deficient phenotypes of CYL5972 and CYL6194 were confirmed by rocket immunoelectrophoresis using a type-specific, rabbit anti-type 8 antiserum (31).

For the isolation of RNA for Northern blot analysis and for the collagen binding assays (see below), all strains were grown without antibiotic selection. Growth rate was not affected by any of the mutations under these conditions. In all cases, the stability of each mutation in the absence of selection was confirmed by plating on both selective and nonselective media (data not shown). The only exceptions were the RN6390 and SarR strains carrying the pLI50::cna construct, both of which were grown in tryptic soy broth containing 5 μg of chloramphenicol per ml.

Northern blot analysis.Total cellular RNA was isolated as previously described (8). Because all mutations are defined by stable, chromosomal insertions, and because antibiotic selection affects growth rate, all strains were grown in tryptic soy broth without antibiotic selection. The similarity in optical density of each culture at the time points when RNA samples were collected was confirmed by measuring the optical density (A560). Additionally, the stability of each mutation was confirmed by plating on selective and nonselective media at the conclusion of each experiment. RNA samples were denatured by using glyoxal and analyzed either by conventional Northern blotting (9) or by slot blotting. All gels were stained with ethidium bromide prior to transfer in order to confirm equal loads of RNA in each well. For slot blot analysis, RNA samples were vacuum drawn onto positively charged nylon membranes (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.), using a Bio-Dot SF slot blot apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.). After rinsing of each slot with Tris-EDTA buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 1 mM EDTA), the membrane was removed from the apparatus and the RNA was fixed to the membrane by using UV light (UV Crosslinker; Fisher Scientific, St. Louis, Mo.). The membrane was then processed according to our standard Northern blot protocol (8). Unless otherwise noted, 10 μg of total cellular RNA (based on A260) was loaded in each lane or slot. Northern blotting was done with a digoxigenin-dUTP-labeledcna probe as previously described (8).

Collagen binding assays.Collagen binding assays were done with 125I-labeled collagen (types I and II; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) as previously described (8). Briefly, cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and resuspended to an optical density (A560) of 1.0 in PBS containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% Tween 20 (binding buffer). A 1.0-ml aliquot of the standardized cell suspension was placed in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube that had been precoated overnight at 4°C with PBS containing 2% bovine serum. After addition of 105 dpm of125I-labeled collagen and incubation at room temperature with constant end-over-end mixing for 1 h, cells were pelleted and the bulk of the supernatant was removed. The tube was then centrifuged a second time, and the remaining supernatant was removed. The radioactivity retained in the pellet was measured in a gamma counter (8). Binding assays were done in duplicate, with the results reported as the average ± standard deviation.

Competition assays were done as described above except that unlabeled collagen, fibronectin, or fibrinogen was mixed with125I-labeled type I collagen immediately before addition to the standardized cell suspension. The amount of unlabeled protein was calculated to be in 10-fold excess with respect to labeled collagen, based on the assumption that 100% of the input collagen was labeled and recovered in the appropriate column fractions.

RESULTS

CBC as a function of cna.Collagen binding assays using 32 strains of S. aureus confirmed that strains that encode cna have a high CBC by comparison tocna-negative strains, all of which bound collagen at levels comparable to that of an S. epidermidis control (Fig.1). In all cases, the results of our collagen binding assays were consistent with both type I (Fig. 1) and type II (Fig. 2) collagen. There were two exceptions to the correlation between cna and CBC, both of which involved cna-positive strains with a low CBC. The first was a single strain (ACH5) that had a CBC comparable to that ofcna-negative strains (Fig. 1). Based on Northern blot analysis revealing the complete absence of cna mRNA (data not shown), the failure of ACH5 to bind collagen appears to arise from an as yet undefined transcriptional defect. The second exception involved the highly encapsulated strains Smith diffuse (SD) and M, both of which grow as mucoid colonies in vitro. As discussed below, the low CBC of SD and M appears to be due to masking of the collagen adhesin on the cell surface.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Type I collagen binding as a function of cna. The CBC of cna-negative and cna-positive strains (Table 1) was determined by using type I collagen. S. epidermidis was included as a negative control. CBC was determined in cells from cultures in mid-exponential growth (4 h). Results are reported as averages of two assays; error bars indicate standard deviations.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Type II collagen binding as a function ofcna. CBC was determined by using type II collagen. Assays were done with cells from cultures in mid-exponential growth (4 h). Results are reported as averages of two assays; error bars indicate standard deviations. S. aureus strains and their relevant genotypes are indicated below the chart.

The CBC of cna-positive strains was competitively inhibited in the presence of unlabeled collagen but not in the presence of unlabeled fibrinogen or fibronectin (Fig.3). In contrast, the CBC observed withcna-negative strains was not affected by the presence of any of the unlabeled proteins that we tested, including collagen (Fig. 3). These results indicate that the radioactivity observed in the pellet ofcna-negative strains represents the background associated with our assay rather than the low-level binding of collagen by an adhesin present in strains that do not encode cna.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Competition assays. Collagen binding assays were done with type I collagen and cells from exponential-phase (4-h) cultures of UAMS-1 (cna positive) and RN6390 (cna negative). Assays were done with equal amounts of 125I-labeled collagen and an excess of unlabeled competitor protein. Results are reported as averages of two assays; error bars indicate standard deviations. None, no competitor protein; Cn, unlabeled collagen as competitor; Fb, unlabeled fibrinogen as competitor; Fn, unlabeled fibronectin as competitor.

CBC as a function of capsule production.The CBC of the SD and M strains was lower than that of other cna-positive strains (Fig. 4A) despite the fact that both strains encoded and expressed cna (Fig. 4B). To determine whether the low CBC was associated with the fact that these strains are heavily encapsulated, we compared the CBC of SD and M with that of capsule-deficient derivatives of each strain (Smith compact [SC] and M variant [MV], respectively). In both cases, the capsule-deficient strains had a CBC significantly higher than that of their parent strains (Fig. 4A). Although both SC and MV are spontaneous mutants that have not been characterized at the genetic level, the fact that the parent and mutant strains expressed similar levels of cnamRNA (Fig. 4B) indicates that the mutation responsible for the capsule-deficient phenotype of SC and MV did not affect cnatranscription. Moreover, a subsequent experiment comparing the CBC of strain M and a derivative of M carrying a specific cap gene deletion (CYL5556) (24) confirmed that elimination of the capsule restored the ability to bind collagen (Fig. 4A). We conclude that the reduced CBC of SD and M is due to the presence of an extensive capsule that conceals the collagen adhesin and prevents its interaction with collagen. However, when we compared the CBC of UAMS-1 and Becker with that of cap mutants of each strain (CYL6194 and CYL5972, respectively), we observed only a slight increase in CBC with the capsule mutants (Fig. 4A). The relative amount of collagen binding in UAMS-1 and Becker and their capsule mutants did not change as a function of growth phase (i.e., the capsule mutants bound slightly more collagen when both exponential- and post-exponential-phase samples were examined) (data not shown). Because UAMS-1 and Becker are microencapsulated strains, these results suggest that any masking effect associated with the S. aureus capsule is limited to those strains that produce an abundance of capsular exopolysaccharide.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

CBC as a function of capsule production. (A) CBC of two microencapsulated strains (UAMS-1 and Becker), two mucoid strains (SD and M), and their respective capsule-deficient mutants. CBC was determined by using type I collagen. (B) Northern slot blotting with acna probe and total cellular RNA from exponentially growing cultures of the indicated strains.

CBC variation in cna-positive strains.With the exceptions of ACH5, SD and M, all cna-positive strains had a CBC at least fivefold higher than that of any cna-negative strain (Fig. 1). However, we also observed a threefold difference in the CBC of cna-positive strains (Fig. 1). These differences were not correlated to structural variations in the cna gene itself. Specifically, our analysis included strains encodingcna variants with one (UAMS-1 and Becker), two (ACH2 and Phillips), three (Cowan, FDA574, ACH4, and UAMS-604), and four (UAMS-639) copies of the 561-bp B domain (26), and there was no correlation between the number of B domains and CBC (Fig. 1). Rather, the differences that we observed among cna-positive strains were correlated to differences in the level of cnatranscription during exponential growth. For example, S. aureus Phillips had the highest CBC (Fig. 5A) and also appeared to have the highest level of cna mRNA (Fig.5B). Conversely, Becker had the lowest CBC (Fig. 5A) and the lowest amount of cna mRNA (Fig. 5B). Strains that had a CBC between these extremes also appeared to express intermediate amounts of cna mRNA. These results suggest that with the exception of highly encapsulated strains of S. aureus, variations in CBC are a function of variations incna transcription rather than structural differences within the collagen adhesin itself.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

CBC as a function of cna transcription. (A) CBC was determined by using type I collagen and cells taken from cultures in exponential (open bars) and post-exponential (hatched bars) growth. RN6390 was included as a cna-negative control. Error bars indicate standard deviations based on two assays. (B) Northern blotting done with a cna probe and total cellular RNA from early-exponential (E)- and post-exponential (P)-phase cultures of the six cna-positive strains shown in panel A.

Temporal expression of cna.We recently demonstrated that cna transcription in S. aureus was temporally regulated, with expression being highest in exponentially growing cultures and falling to almost undetectable levels as cultures entered the post-exponential growth phase (8). Although two of the three agr mutants examined in the previous study appeared to express slightly elevated levels of cna mRNA during the exponential growth phase, mutation of agr did not alter the temporal pattern of cna transcription (8).

The temporal regulation of cna transcription was confirmed in this study. Specifically, Northern blot analysis of RNA samples taken from each of six cna-positive strains revealed that the level of cna mRNA was highest during the exponential growth phase and then fell to almost undetectable levels (Fig. 5B). The CBC of all six cna-positive strains was also highest when cells taken from exponential-phase cultures were assayed (Fig. 5A). However, despite the drastic drop in the level of cna mRNA present in stationary-phase samples, the CBC of allcna-positive strains remained higher than that ofcna-negative strains (Fig. 5A). These results are consistent with our previous conclusion that the S. aureus collagen adhesin is relatively stable (8). The observation that the CBC of cna-negative strains did not change as a function of growth phase (data not shown) provides further support for our conclusion that the radioactivity detected in the pellet ofcna-negative strains represents the background associated with our assay rather than collagen binding associated with an alternative collagen-binding adhesin.

Regulation of cna transcription.The previous suggestion that mutation of agr resulted in a slight increase in the CBC of some, but not all, S. aureus strains (8) was also confirmed during the course of this study. For instance, the CBC observed with a clinical osteomyelitis isolate (UAMS-1) was not significantly different from the CBC observed with an isogenic agr-null mutant (UAMS-6911) (Fig.6A). However, we did observe an increase in the CBC of an agr-null mutant (UAMS-171) derived from UAMS-174 (Fig. 6A). Northern blot analysis confirmed that the increased CBC observed in UAMS-171 was a function of increased cnatranscription (Fig. 6B). These results suggest that agrnegatively regulates cna transcription during the exponential growth phase but that the regulatory influence ofagr is strain dependent. Additionally, mutation ofagr did not affect the temporal pattern of cnatranscription (Fig. 6B).

  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Effect of sar and agr mutation oncna transcription and CBC. (A) CBC of sar andagr mutants was determined by using type I collagen and cells taken from exponential-phase cultures. S. aureusstrains and their relevant genotypes are indicated below the chart. RN6390 was included as a negative control. (B) Northern blotting done with a cna probe and 5 μg of total cellular RNA taken from cultures during exponential (4 h) and post-exponential (8 and 24 h) growth phases. S. aureus strains and their relevant genotypes are indicated above the appropriate lanes. Exponential-phase (4-h) samples from UAMS-1 and RN6390 were included as positive and negative controls, respectively. It should be noted that UAMS-1 encodes a cna gene with a single B domain, while the cnavariant introduced into the RN6390 strains contains three B domains. (C) Growth curve for RN6390 agr and sar mutants in panels A and B.

To determine whether mutation of the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sar) had any effect on the temporal pattern ofcna transcription, we introduced cna into RN6390 and an isogenic sar mutant (SarR) both as part of a multicopy plasmid (pLI50::cna) and as a single-copy chromosomal insertion (geh::cna). In both the plasmid-borne and chromosomal variants, the cna-positive derivatives of SarR (UAMS-177 and UAMS-175, respectively) had an elevated CBC by comparison to the corresponding cna-positive derivatives of RN6390 (UAMS-176 and UAMS-174, respectively) (Fig.7A). Importantly, the increased CBC observed in the UAMS-175 sar mutant (Fig. 7A) exceeded the increase observed in the UAMS-171 agr mutant (Fig. 6A). Northern blot analysis confirmed that the increased CBC observed in thesar mutants was due to an increase in the level ofcna transcription (Fig. 7B). To quantitate this increase, we repeated the Northern blot analysis using twofold dilutions of total cellular RNA taken from exponential-phase cultures of thecna-positive derivatives of RN6390 and SarR (Fig.8). By comparison to UAMS-176 (RN6390, pLI50::cna), UAMS-177 (SarR, pLI50::cna) appeared to express at least eightfold more cna mRNA (Fig. 8). The increase was even more apparent when UAMS-174 (RN6390, geh::cna) and UAMS-175 (SarR, geh::cna) were compared. Specifically, UAMS-175 appeared to express cna at a level at least 32-fold higher than that for UAMS-174 (Fig. 8). Although less apparent, the increase in cna transcription seen in UAMS-175 was also reflected in the CBC. Specifically, UAMS-177 had a CBC approximately twice as high as that of UAMS-176, while UAMS-175 had a CBC approximately fourfold higher than that of UAMS-174 (Fig. 7A).

Fig. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Role of sar in cna transcription and CBC. (A) CBC of cna-positive variants of RN6390 and SarR. Plasmid (pLI50::cna) and chromosomalcna variants (geh::cna) are indicated below the chart. (B) Northern slot blotting using acna probe and total cellular RNA from exponential-phase (4-h) cultures of the strains in panel A.

Fig. 8.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

Quantitative analysis of cna transcription insar mutants, using twofold serial dilutions of total cellular RNA from exponential-phase (4-h) cultures ofcna-positive derivatives of RN6390 and SarR. RNA was analyzed by slot blotting using a probe specific for cna. Approximate amounts of RNA are indicated in micrograms at the left.

By comparison to UAMS-174, cna transcription in UAMS-175 not only was elevated during the exponential growth phase but also persisted at a relatively high level as cultures entered the post-exponential growth phase (Fig. 6B). These results suggest that thesar regulatory locus also contributes either directly or indirectly to the temporal regulation of cna transcription. The same temporal pattern of cna transcription was observed when we examined a sar agr double mutant (Fig. 6B). Additionally, the effect of the double mutation on cnatranscription appeared to be additive, with the amount ofcna mRNA in the sar agr double mutant being slightly higher than the amount observed in either the saror the agr mutant strains (Fig. 6B). These results were also confirmed by our collagen binding assays. Specifically, the CBC observed during the exponential growth phase with the sar agr double mutant consistently exceeded that observed in thesar mutant in assays using both type I (Fig. 6A) and type II (Fig. 2) collagen. Interestingly, although the level of cnamRNA was increased during the post-exponential growth phase in both thesar mutant and the sar agr double mutant, the temporal pattern of collagen binding was unchanged compared to the wild-type strain. Specifically, the CBC of the sar mutants still peaked during the exponential growth phase and fell as cultures entered the post-exponential growth phase (Fig. 6A).

DISCUSSION

There is mounting evidence to suggest that S. aureusMSCRAMMs (adhesins) are important in the pathogenesis of various forms of staphylococcal disease. For example, the ability to bind fibronectin has been associated with the colonization of heart valves and endocarditis (17), while the production of a 19-kDa extracellular fibrinogen-binding protein has been associated with the colonization of wounds (25). The ability to bind fibronectin, fibrinogen, laminin, or thrombospondin has also been shown to promote the adherence of S. aureus to various biopolymers, including those used in the construction of indwelling medical devices (10, 11). Similarly, inactivation of the collagen adhesin gene (cna) has been correlated to reduced virulence in animal models of endocarditis and septic arthritis (12, 28). The latter is consistent with the observation thatS. aureus isolates obtained from patients with septic arthritis and osteomyelitis generally exhibit an enhanced capacity to bind collagen (26). Moreover, we recently demonstrated that the collagen adhesin encoded by cna is present on the surface of S. aureus cells growing in bone (8). Taken together, these observations clearly suggest an important role for S. aureus adhesins in various forms of staphylococcal disease.

As part of our efforts to assess the role of adhesins in the pathobiology of S. aureus, we recently mapped each of the recognized adhesin genes within the S. aureus chromosome and assessed the prevalence of each gene among clinical isolates (33). The genes encoding the elastin-binding protein (ebpS), two fibrinogen-binding proteins (fib andclfA), and at least one of the two fibronectin-binding proteins (fnbA and/or fnbB) were present in every strain that we examined (n = 25). The mapgene, which has been reported to encode an adhesin capable of mediating the low-level binding of a number of host proteins, was also present in all strains. In contrast, the cna collagen adhesin gene was present in only 10 of 25 strains (33).

The observation that cna is not present in most S. aureus strains is important because (i) cna is known to encode a high-affinity, collagen-specific adhesin (29, 30) and (ii) S. aureus strains isolated from patients with septic arthritis or osteomyelitis typically exhibit an enhanced capacity to bind collagen (2, 13). The fact that a relatively rare characteristic of the population is conserved among isolates that cause a specific form of staphylococcal disease suggests that the phenotype is associated with the pathogenesis of the disease. However, to date there has not been a comprehensive analysis establishing a direct correlation between the collagen adhesin encoded by cna and the ability to bind collagen. It therefore remains possible that cna-negative strains have some capacity to bind collagen as a function of either a broad-specificity adhesin (e.g., Map) or some as yet unrecognized adhesin. Indeed, Nilsson et al. (22) reported that mutation of sarin the cna-negative strain DB resulted in an enhanced capacity to bind type II collagen. Additionally, no binding was observed with type I collagen (22). Because DB does not encode cna, and because the collagen adhesin encoded bycna is known to bind both type I and type II collagen (26), these results suggest the existence of a second collagen adhesin that exhibits specificity for certain types of collagen.

We believe that the results presented here rule out the possibility that S. aureus encodes a second adhesin that makes a significant contribution to collagen binding by comparison to the adhesin encoded by cna. Specifically, our results for a number of cna-positive and cna-negative strains, using both type I and type II collagen, indicate that the high level of collagen binding in S. aureus is a direct function of the presence and expression of cna. We base that conclusion on the observations that (i) with only two exceptions, everycna-positive strain examined had a CBC at least fivefold higher than that of any cna-negative strain, (ii) the only exceptions to the correlation between cna and CBC can be explained either by the failure to transcribe cna or by the presence of an extensive capsule that masks the collagen adhesin itself (see below), (iii) in strains that were not heavily encapsulated and expressed cna, variations in CBC corresponded to the level of cna transcription, (iv) the alterations observed in the CBC of our sar and agr regulatory mutants can be explained by the effect of each mutation on cnatranscription, and (v) none of the cna-negative strains examined bound collagen above the background level of our assay. The last is based on the observation that the amounts of radioactivity observed in pellets from all cna-negative strains were essentially identical, did not change as a function of growth phase, and were not reduced in the presence of other host proteins, including unlabeled collagen. In contrast, the binding of125I-labeled collagen in cna-positive strains was specifically inhibited by the presence of unlabeled collagen. It should be emphasized that our studies included the DB and 11D2 strains examined by Nilsson et al. (22) and that we did not observe collagen binding above background levels in either strain, using either type I or type II collagen. Indeed, type I and type II collagen worked equally well in our binding assays, and we did not observe any strain-dependent distinctions in the ability to bind different collagen types. Although we cannot explain the difference between our results and those reported by Nilsson et al. (22), we believe that our results demonstrate that the high-level binding of collagen byS. aureus is not restricted to certain types of collagen. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that S. aureusencodes a second adhesin that mediates collagen binding in a type-specific manner at a level below the sensitivity of our assay.

The observation that the highly encapsulated strains SD and M had a CBC lower than that of their corresponding capsule-deficient derivatives suggests that the presence of an extensive capsule may mask the adhesin on the surface of the bacterial cell. A similar masking effect helps the bacterial cell avoid phagocytosis by preventing recognition of C3b deposited on the cell surface (3). It is possible that masking of the collagen adhesin also helps the bacterial cell avoid recognition by host immune system. However, the S. aureuscollagen adhesin appears to contribute to the colonization of musculoskeletal tissues (28), which suggests that the inhibition of collagen binding associated with capsule production might inhibit the colonization of at least some tissues. Although not conclusive, that observation is consistent with our demonstration thatS. aureus SD is not virulent in a rabbit osteomyelitis model despite the fact that it encodes and expresses cna and is highly virulent in a murine peritonitis model of staphylococcal disease (35). However, given the fact that capsule-deficient mutants of UAMS-1 and Becker did not have a CBC significantly higher than that their microencapsulated parent strains, the inhibitory effect of the capsule is apparently restricted to those strains that produce an abundance of capsular exopolysaccharide.

Our results also demonstrate that variations in CBC amongcna-positive strains is associated with the levelcna transcription and is independent of any functional difference associated with structural variations in the collagen adhesin. Specifically, our studies included strains that encode each of four cna variants that differ in the number (one, two, three, or four) of B domains (30). The B domain is a 561-bp region that is directly repeated in strains that have multiple domains. Other than the fact that it is not responsible for binding collagen (27), the function of the B domain is unknown. One intriguing possibility is that multiple B domains extend the ligand-binding A domain outward such that it is more exposed even in encapsulated strains. It should be noted that all of our capsule-deficient mutants were generated in strains that encode acna gene with a single B domain. We are currently investigating the possibility that cna variants that have multiple B domains are less subject to the inhibitory effect of the capsule.

Finally, our results establish that the temporal pattern ofcna transcription observed in our earlier experiments (8) is a consistent feature of all cna-positive strains. The temporal pattern observed with cna is characteristic of S. aureus surface proteins, most of which are regulated by the accessory gene regulator (agr) and/or the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sar). In a previous report, we demonstrated that mutation of agr had no effect on the temporal pattern of cna transcription (8). That finding was confirmed in this study. Our earlier study also suggested that mutation of agr resulted in an increase incna transcription during the exponential growth phase in some, but not all, strains (8). The strain-dependent increase in the level of cna transcription during the exponential growth phase was also confirmed during the course of this study. Taken together, our results suggest that agr encodes or induces some factor that represses cna transcription during exponential growth but that the more complete repression observed as cultures enter the post-exponential growth phase requires an additional, agr-independent regulatory signal.

One possibility is the temporal signal described by Vandenesch et al. (37), who demonstrated that the induction of hlatranscription requires induction of the agr-encoded RNA III effector molecule and an additional agr-independent regulatory signal that is induced during the transition between exponential and post-exponential growth. At present, the nature of this additional regulatory signal and its contribution to the regulation ofS. aureus virulence factors other than hla are unknown. A second possibility is the staphylococcal accessory regulator (sar). To examine that possibility, we introducedcna into RN6390 and its otherwise isogenic SarR mutant. Our results indicate that mutation of sar results in a significant increase in the exponential-phase expression ofcna and a delay in the post-exponential-phase repression ofcna transcription. These results suggest that saris the primary regulatory element controlling expression ofcna. At present, we do not know whether thesar-mediated regulation of cna transcription is a function of a direct interaction between SarA and ciselements upstream of cna or involves an additional regulatory element that is not encoded within the sar locus.

Interestingly, mutation of both sar and agr had an additive effect on CBC by comparison to the correspondingsar and agr single mutants. One intriguing possibility that would explain these results is that the sensory component of the agr system somehow modulates a response regulator that is either encoded within sar or induced in response to some sar-encoded regulatory signal. Because mutation of the sensory component of two-component regulatory systems typically has a more moderate effect on phenotype than mutation of the response regulator (20), such as scenario would explain the moderate increase in CBC observed with an agr mutant and the more drastic increase in CBC observed with the sar mutant. However, mutation of agr has no effect on the production of any sar transcript (1). Moreover, the additive effect observed with sar agr double mutants would not be expected based on the scenario described above. In fact, an additive effect would not be expected in any scenario in which thesar and agr regulatory signals were interdependent. For that reason, we conclude that the regulatory effects exerted by the sar and agr loci oncna transcription are independent of each other.

Finally, although mutation of sar resulted in a delay in the post-exponential-phase repression of cna transcription, the delay did not have a significant impact on the post-exponential-phase CBC. Specifically, while collagen binding and cnatranscription were highest during the exponential growth phase, the post-exponential-phase decline in CBC was apparent even insar mutants. These results suggest that sar may have an impact on collagen binding at some posttranscriptional level. One possibility for the decrease in CBC despite the continued production of cna mRNA is that mutation of sarresults in overproduction of proteases that degrade the collagen-binding adhesin. Indeed, mutation of sar is known to result in enhanced proteolytic activity (5). A second possibility is that the overproduction of the cna-encoded adhesin or some other surface protein affects the surface architecture of S. aureus in such a way that the adhesin cannot be appropriately localized to the cell surface. Indeed, the observation that the cna-encoded adhesin is anchored in the cell envelope in a manner that is distinct by comparison to other S. aureus surface proteins (32) suggests that the collagen adhesin may be differentially affected in strains carrying mutations that alter expression of multiple target genes. Although we cannot yet explain the discrepancy between cna transcription and CBC in post-exponential-phase cultures of sar mutants, it is important to note that the discrepancy involves the failure to bind collagen despite expression of cna rather than the ability to bind collagen in the absence of cna transcription. These results therefore do not detract from our conclusion that the collagen adhesin encoded by cna is the primary adhesin responsible for the ability of S. aureus to bind collagen.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by grants AI37729 (M.S.S.) and AI37027 (C.Y.L.) from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease and by grant 96-046 from the Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation (M.S.S.). A.F.G. was supported in part by funds from the UAMS Graduate Student Research Fund.

We thank Joe Patti for his generous gift of CYL574.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 2 October 1997.
    • Returned for modification 14 January 1998.
    • Accepted 9 February 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bayer M. G.,
    2. Heinrichs J. H.,
    3. Cheung A. L.
    The molecular architecture of the sar locus in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 178 1996 4563 4570
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Buxton T. B.,
    2. Rissing J. P.,
    3. Horner J. A.,
    4. Plowman K. M.,
    5. Scott D. F.,
    6. Sprinkle T. J.,
    7. Best G. K.
    Binding of a Staphylococcus aureus bone pathogen to type I collagen. Microb. Pathog. 8 1990 441 448
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Cheung A. L.,
    2. Eberhardt K.,
    3. Heinrichs J. H.
    Regulation of protein A synthesis by the sar and agr loci of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 65 1997 2243 2249
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    1. Cheung A. L.,
    2. Yeaman M. R.,
    3. Sullam P. M.,
    4. Witt M. D.,
    5. Bayer A. S.
    Role of the sar locus of Staphylococcus aureus in induction of endocarditis in rabbits. Infect. Immun. 62 1994 1719 1725
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Cheung A. L.,
    2. Ying P.
    Regulation of α- and β-hemolysins by the sar locus of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 176 1994 580 585
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.
    1. Christensen G. D.,
    2. Baddour L. M.,
    3. Madison B. M.,
    4. Parisi J. T.,
    5. Abraham S. N.,
    6. Hasty D. L.,
    7. Lowrance J. H.,
    8. Josephs J. A.,
    9. Simpson A.
    Colonial morphology of staphylococci on Memphis agar: phase variation of slime production, resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, and virulence. J. Infect. Dis. 161 1990 1153 1169
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.
    1. Gillaspy A. F.,
    2. Hickmon S. G.,
    3. Skinner R. A.,
    4. Thomas J. R.,
    5. Nelson C. L.,
    6. Smeltzer M. S.
    Role of the accessory gene regulator (agr) in the pathogenesis of staphylococcal osteomyelitis. Infect. Immun. 63 1995 3373 3380
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Gillaspy A. F.,
    2. Patti J. M.,
    3. Smeltzer M. S.
    Transcriptional regulation of the Staphylococcus aureus collagen adhesin gene, cna. Infect. Immun. 65 1997 1536 1540
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hart M. E.,
    2. Smeltzer M. S.,
    3. Iandolo J. J.
    The extracellular protein regulator (xpr) affects exoprotein and agr mRNA levels in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 175 1993 7875 7879
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Herrmann M.,
    2. Suchard S. J.,
    3. Boxer L. A.,
    4. Waldvogel F. A.,
    5. Lew P. D.
    Thrombospondin binds to Staphylococcus aureus and promotes staphylococcal adherence to surfaces. Infect. Immun. 59 1991 279 288
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Herrmann M.,
    2. Vaudaux P. E.,
    3. Pittet D.,
    4. Auckenthaler R. A.,
    5. Lew P. D.,
    6. Schmacher-Perdreau F.,
    7. Peters G.,
    8. Waldvogel F. A.
    Fibronectin, fibrinogen, and laminin act as mediators of adherence of clinical staphylococcal isolates to foreign material. J. Infect. Dis. 158 1988 693 701
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hienz S. A.,
    2. Schennings T.,
    3. Heimdahl A.,
    4. Flock J. I.
    Collagen binding of Staphylococcus aureus is a virulence factor in experimental endocarditis. J. Infect. Dis. 174 1996 83 88
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Holderbaum D.,
    2. Spech T.,
    3. Ehrhart L. A.,
    4. Keys T.,
    5. Hall G. S.
    Collagen binding in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25 1987 2258 2261
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Horinouchi S.,
    2. Weisblum B.
    Nucleotide sequence and functional map of pC194, a plasmid that specifies inducible chloramphenicol resistance. J. Bacteriol. 150 1982 815 825
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Jonsson K.,
    2. McDevitt D.,
    3. McGavin M. H.,
    4. Patti J. M.,
    5. Höök M.
    Staphylococcus aureus expresses a major histocompatibility complex class II analog. J. Biol. Chem. 270 1995 21457 21460
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.
    1. Karakawa W. W.,
    2. Fournier J. M.,
    3. Vann W. F.,
    4. Arbeit R.,
    5. Schneerson R. S.,
    6. Robbins J. B.
    Method for the serological typing of the capsular polysaccharides of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 22 1985 445 447
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Kuypers J. M.,
    2. Proctor R. A.
    Reduced adherence to traumatized rat heart valves by a low-fibronectin-binding mutant of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 57 1989 2306 2312
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.
    1. Lee C. Y.
    Cloning of genes affecting capsule expression in Staphylococcus aureus strain M. Mol. Microbiol. 6 1992 1515 1522
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Lin W. S.,
    2. Cunneen T.,
    3. Lee C. Y.
    Sequence analysis and molecular characterization of genes required for the biosynthesis of type I capsular polysaccharide in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 176 1994 7005 7016
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Magasanik B.
    Historical perspective Two-component signal transduction. Hoch J. A., Silhavy T. J. 1995 1 5 ASM Press Washington, D.C
  21. 21.↵
    1. McGavin M. H.,
    2. Krajewska-Pietrasik D.,
    3. Rydén C.,
    4. Höök M.
    Identification of a Staphylococcus aureus extracellular matrix-binding protein with broad specificity. Infect. Immun. 61 1993 2479 2485
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Nilsson I.,
    2. Bremell T.,
    3. Rydén C.,
    4. Cheung A. L.,
    5. Tarkowski A.
    Role of the staphylococcal accessory gene regulator (sar) in septic arthritis. Infect. Immun. 64 1996 4438 4443
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Novick R. P.,
    2. Ross H. F.,
    3. Projan S. J.,
    4. Kornblum J.,
    5. Kreiswirth B.,
    6. Moghazeh S.
    Synthesis of staphylococcal virulence factors is controlled by a regulatory RNA molecule. EMBO J. 12 1993 3967 3975
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    1. Ouyang S.,
    2. Lee C. Y.
    Transcriptional analysis of type 1 capsule genes in Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 23 1997 473 482
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Palma M.,
    2. Nozohoor S.,
    3. Schennings T.,
    4. Heimdahl A.,
    5. Flock J.-I.
    Lack of the extracellular 19-kilodalton fibrinogen-binding protein from Staphylococcus aureus decreases virulence in experimental wound infection. Infect. Immun. 64 1996 5284 5289
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Patti J. M.,
    2. Allen B. L.,
    3. McGavin M. J.,
    4. Höök M.
    MSCRAMM-mediated adherence of microorganisms to host tissue. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 48 1994 585 617
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Patti J. M.,
    2. Boles J. O.,
    3. Höök M.
    Identification and biochemical characterization of the ligand binding domain of the collagen adhesin from Staphylococcus aureus. Biochemistry 32 1993 11428 11435
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Patti J. M.,
    2. Bremell T.,
    3. Krajewska-Pietrasik D.,
    4. Abdelnour A.,
    5. Tarkowski A.,
    6. Rydén C.,
    7. Höök M.
    The Staphylococcus aureus collagen adhesin is a virulence determinant in experimental septic arthritis. Infect. Immun. 62 1994 152 161
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Patti J. M.,
    2. House-Pompeo K.,
    3. Boles J. O.,
    4. Garza N.,
    5. Gurusiddappa S.,
    6. Höök M.
    Critical residues in the ligand-binding site of the Staphylococcus aureus collagen-binding adhesin (MSCRAMM). J. Biol. Chem. 270 1995 12005 12011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Patti J. M.,
    2. Jonsson H.,
    3. Guss B.,
    4. Switalski L. M.,
    5. Wigberg K.,
    6. Lindgerg M.,
    7. Höök M.
    Molecular characterization and expression of a gene encoding a Staphylococcus aureus collagen adhesin. J. Biol. Chem. 267 1992 4766 4772
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Sau S.,
    2. Sun J. W.,
    3. Lee C. Y.
    Molecular characterization and transcriptional analysis of type 8 capsule genes in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 179 1997 1614 1621
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Schneewind O.,
    2. Mihaylora-Petkov D.,
    3. Model P.
    Cell wall sorting signals in surface proteins of Gram-positive bacteria. EMBO J. 12 1993 4803 4811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Smeltzer M. S.,
    2. Gillaspy A. F.,
    3. Pratt F. L. Jr.,
    4. Thames M. D.,
    5. Iandolo J. J.
    Prevalence and chromosomal map location of Staphylococcus aureus adhesin genes. Gene 196 1997 249 259
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 34.
    1. Smeltzer M. S.,
    2. Pratt F. L. Jr.,
    3. Gillaspy A. F.,
    4. Young L. A.
    Genomic fingerprinting for the epidemiological differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34 1996 1364 1372
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Smeltzer M. S.,
    2. Thomas J. R.,
    3. Hickmon S. G.,
    4. Skinner R. A.,
    5. Nelson C. L.,
    6. Griffith D. L.,
    7. Parr T. R. Jr.,
    8. Evans R. P.
    Characterization of a rabbit model of staphylococcal osteomyelitis. J. Ortho. Res. 15 1997 414 421
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Switalski L. M.,
    2. Butcher W. G.,
    3. Patti J. M.,
    4. Speziale P.,
    5. Gristina A. G.,
    6. Höök M.
    Collagen receptor of Staphylococcus aureus Microbial adhesion and invasion. Hook M., Switalski L. 1992 101 114 Springer-Verlag New York, N.Y
  37. 37.↵
    1. Vandenesch F.,
    2. Kornblum J.,
    3. Novick R. P.
    A temporal signal, independent of agr, is required for hla but not spa transcription in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol. 173 1991 6313 6320
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Factors Affecting the Collagen Binding Capacity ofStaphylococcus aureus
Allison F. Gillaspy, Chia Y. Lee, Subrata Sau, Ambrose L. Cheung, Mark S. Smeltzer
Infection and Immunity Jul 1998, 66 (7) 3170-3178; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.7.3170-3178.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Factors Affecting the Collagen Binding Capacity ofStaphylococcus aureus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Factors Affecting the Collagen Binding Capacity ofStaphylococcus aureus
Allison F. Gillaspy, Chia Y. Lee, Subrata Sau, Ambrose L. Cheung, Mark S. Smeltzer
Infection and Immunity Jul 1998, 66 (7) 3170-3178; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.7.3170-3178.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Adhesins, Bacterial
Bacterial Proteins
collagen
Staphylococcus aureus
Trans-Activators

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522