Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PATHOGENESIS

Involvement of the Haemophilus ducreyi gmhA Gene Product in Lipooligosaccharide Expression and Virulence

Beth A. Bauer, Marla K. Stevens, Eric J. Hansen
Beth A. Bauer
Department of Microbiology and
Division of Comparative Medicine, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9048
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marla K. Stevens
Department of Microbiology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric J. Hansen
Department of Microbiology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.9.4290-4298.1998
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The lipooligosaccharide (LOS) present in the outer membrane ofHaemophilus ducreyi is likely a virulence factor for this sexually transmitted pathogen. An open reading frame in H. ducreyi 35000 was found to encode a predicted protein that had 87% identity with the protein product of the gmhA(isn) gene of Haemophilus influenzae. InH. influenzae type b, inactivation of the gmhAgene caused the synthesis of a significantly truncated LOS which possessed only lipid A and a single 2-keto-3-deoxyoctulosonic acid molecule (A. Preston, D. J. Maskell, A. Johnson, and E. R. Moxon, J. Bacteriol. 178:396–402, 1996). The H. ducreyi gmhA gene was able to complement a gmhA-deficientEscherichia coli strain, a result which confirmed the identity of this gene. When the gmhA gene of H. ducreyi was inactivated by insertion of a catcartridge, the resultant H. ducreyi gmhA mutant, 35000.252, expressed a LOS that migrated much faster than wild-type LOS in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. When the wild-type H. ducreyi strain and its isogenic gmhA mutant were used in the temperature-dependent rabbit model for dermal lesion production byH. ducreyi, the gmhA mutant was found to be substantially less virulent than the wild-type parent strain. TheH. ducreyi gmhA gene was amplified by PCR from the H. ducreyi chromosome and cloned into the pLS88 vector. When theH. ducreyi gmhA gene was present in trans ingmhA mutant 35000.252, expression of the gmhAgene product restored the virulence of this mutant to wild-type levels. These results indicate that the gmhA gene product of H. ducreyi is essential for the expression of wild-type LOS by this pathogen.

Haemophilus ducreyi, a gram-negative coccobacillus, is the etiologic agent of the sexually transmitted disease known as chancroid. This ulcerogenital disease is endemic in areas of Africa, Asia, and Latin America (63), and a resurgence of chancroid has been seen in the United States since early in the 1980s (63). With the finding that chancroid as well as other genital ulcer diseases are significant risk factors for the transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (63), there has been renewed research effort to elucidate the pathogenic mechanisms and virulence factors ofH. ducreyi.

To date, several putative virulence factors of this organism have been identified; these include a cell-associated hemolysin with cytotoxic activity (2, 43), a soluble cytotoxin (12, 50), a hemoglobin-binding outer membrane protein (18, 61), a novel pilus (6), and a copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (52). In addition, gene products which may directly or indirectly regulate the expression of H. ducreyivirulence factors have been identified (11, 44).

As might be expected, the lipooligosaccharide (LOS) of theH. ducreyi outer membrane has been shown to have potent inflammatory ability (10). Physicochemical analyses ofH. ducreyi LOS indicate that it is very similar to the LOS of other gram-negative mucosal surface pathogens, includingNeisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae(22, 36-38, 56). Lactosamine and sialyllactosamine have been identified as the terminal saccharides of the H. ducreyi LOS oligosaccharide chain (37, 38, 56), and a gene encoding cytidine-5′-monophosphate N-acetylneuraminic acid synthetase, an enzyme involved in the ability of this organism to sialylate its LOS (37), has been cloned from H. ducreyi (66).

Only recently have attempts been made to address the possible involvement of the oligosaccharide portion of H. ducreyi LOS in the pathogenesis of chancroid. Mutants defective in the expression of LOS have been described (9, 21, 60), and while at least four different genes whose encoded protein products are directly or indirectly involved in H. ducreyi LOS expression have been cloned and sequenced (21, 60, 66), only one of these has been tested by mutant analysis in relevant in vitro and in vivo systems. An H. ducreyi mutant defective in the expression of an RfaK homolog was shown to exhibit a reduced ability to attach to and invade human keratinocytes in vitro (21). Virulence testing of an independently constructedH. ducreyi rfaK (i.e., lbgB) mutant in the temperature-dependent rabbit model for experimental chancroid (49) yielded equivocal results (60).

In the present study, a gene (gmhA) encoding a phosphoheptose isomerase essential for the expression of wild-type LOS by H. ducreyi 35000 was identified and shown to complement an Escherichia coli gmhA mutant. Inactivation of the H. ducreyi gmhA gene resulted in the expression of a truncated LOS molecule. In addition, the isogenic gmhAmutant exhibited significantly reduced virulence in an animal model for experimental chancroid. Provision of the wild-type H. ducreyi gmhA gene in trans in the isogenic mutant restored both wild-type LOS expression and virulence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions.Some of the bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table1. E. coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (51). LB medium was supplemented, when appropriate, with ampicillin, chloramphenicol, or kanamycin at a final concentration of 100, 30, or 30 μg/ml, respectively. H. ducreyi strains were grown on chocolate agar (CA) plates containing 1% (vol/vol) IsoVitaleX (BBL Microbiology Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) as previously described (49). H. ducreyi strains were grown in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air–5% CO2 at 33°C. CA plates supplemented with chloramphenicol at a final concentration of 2 μg/ml were used for mutant selection. For complementation studies involving H. ducreyi, kanamycin was included in CA at a final concentration of 30 μg/ml. In growth studies, H. ducreyi strains were grown at 33°C with slow shaking in a water bath; growth was monitored by measurement of culture turbidity. A modified Haemophilus somnus liquid medium (29) was used in these growth studies and consisted of filter-sterilized Columbia broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with 0.1% (wt/vol) Tris base, 1% (vol/vol) IsoVitaleX, and heme at a final concentration of 25 μg/ml.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

Recombinant DNA techniques.Standard techniques, such as restriction enzyme digestions, ligation, transformation, electroporation of E. coli strains, and plasmid purification, have been described elsewhere (4, 51). PCR was done with Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wis.), 100 ng of each primer (see below), 2.5 mM MgCl2, and deoxynucleoside triphosphates at 200 μM each. Twenty-nine cycles at an annealing temperature of 55°C were performed for each PCR (62). Boiled bacterial cell preparations (27) or chromosomal DNA purified from H. ducreyi was used as the template for PCR.

Chromosomal DNA preparation.Chromosomal DNA was purified from an overnight culture of H. ducreyi by use of a modification of a method previously described (5). The bacteria were scraped from a single CA plate into 3 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and the mixture was centrifuged to pellet the bacteria. The bacterial pellet was resuspended in 2 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl containing 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), and 150 μl of 10% (wt/vol) sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was added. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 5 min and then at 37°C for 1 h. Next, 200 μl of RNase (10 mg/ml) was added, the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 h, and then 20 μl of 5 M NaCl and 20 μl of proteinase K (10 mg/ml) were added. The mixture was incubated at 56°C for 2 h. One phenol extraction, two phenol-chloroform extractions, and one chloroform extraction were performed in succession as described previously (5). Then, 80 μl of 5 M NaCl and 2 volumes of 100% ethanol were added to the mixture. Precipitated strands of DNA were spooled out on sterile glass rods, rinsed with 70% ethanol, and dissolved in 1 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl–1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0).

Construction of an H. ducreyi genomic library in pWKS30.Chromosomal DNA purified from H. ducreyi35000 was partially digested with Sau3AI. Fragments larger than 6 kb were purified by sucrose density gradient centrifugation, ligated into the BamHI site of pWKS30 (67), and used to transform E. coli DH5α.

Nucleotide sequence analysis.Nucleotide sequence analysis was performed with a model 373 automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Both strands of the 1.6-kbH. ducreyi DNA insert in pHD251 were sequenced in their entirety, as were both strands of the same 1.6-kb region in pHD250. DNA sequence information was analyzed through the National Center for Biotechnology Information by use of the BLAST network service to search GenBank (3) and with MacVector sequence analysis software (version 6; Oxford Molecular Group, Campbell, Calif.).

Construction of an isogenic H. ducreyi gmhAmutant.The oligonucleotide primers P1 (5′-GCGGATCCCAGAGATTTCTTTATCTTCACCCAC-3′) and P2 (5′-CGGGATCCCACGTTACCTCACAGTTACCTTATG-3′) (see Fig. 2) were constructed with a BamHI site (underlined) based on information obtained from the nucleotide sequence of theH. ducreyi DNA insert in pHD250. The use of P1 and P2 in PCR together with 400 ng of purified H. ducreyi35000 chromosomal DNA yielded a 1.6-kb product containing theH. ducreyi gmhA open reading frame (ORF) and flanking DNA. This PCR product was digested with BamHI and then ligated into the BamHI site of pBluescript II KS+. The resultant plasmid (pHD251) was digested with Ppu10I, which cut within the ORF of the gmhA gene.Ppu10I-digested pHD251 was treated with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I (New England BioLabs, Beverly, Mass.) to create blunt ends and then with shrimp alkaline phosphatase (United States Biochemical Corp.). A 1.4-kb cartridge carrying the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene (cat) (24) was then blunt-end ligated into pHD251 to obtain pHD252. The latter plasmid was used to transform E. coli HB101. Plasmid pHD252 was purified by cesium chloride density gradient centrifugation and linearized by digestion with BsaI. The linearized form of pHD252 was used to electroporate H. ducreyi 35000 (24), and transformants were selected on CA plates supplemented with chloramphenicol.

E. coli HB101 was used for propagating pHD252 prior to the use of this DNA for electroporation of H. ducreyi. For reasons that remain to be determined, mutated H. ducreyi DNA inserts from plasmids propagated in some otherE. coli strains, including DH5α, do not allow successful electroporation of H. ducreyi (data not shown).

Complementation of E. coli χ711 with theH. ducreyi gmhA gene.A 1-kb PCR product containing the H. ducreyi gmhA gene was prepared by use of 400 ng of H. ducreyi 35000 chromosomal DNA template together with the oligonucleotide primers P3 (5′-CGGAATTCTGATGCTAGGGATAACTTG-3′) and P4 (5′-CCGAGCTCCGGGGAAGCAATGGTTAAG-3′) (see Fig.2); the underlined sequences indicate EcoRI andSacI sites, respectively. This 1-kb fragment was ligated into the pCR2.1 vector from a TA cloning kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). The ligation reaction mixture was used to transform E. coli DH5α; transformants were selected on LB agar supplemented with ampicillin. A plasmid (pHD253) from one of these transformants was used to electroporate E. coli χ711 (7, 14); selection was accomplished on LB agar containing ampicillin.

Complementation of the H. ducreyi gmhAmutant.The 1-kb PCR product described immediately above was digested with both EcoRI and SacI and then ligated into pLS88 (16) which had been digested with the same two restriction enzymes. The ligation reaction mixture was used to transform E. coli DH5α; transformants were selected on LB agar containing kanamycin. Plasmid pLS253, obtained from one of these transformants, was purified by a miniprep procedure and used to electroporate H. ducreyi gmhA mutant 35000.252. The complemented H. ducreyi mutants were selected on CA containing both kanamycin and chloramphenicol.

MAb and colony blot radioimmunoassay.Monoclonal antibody (MAb) 3E6 is specific for a surface-exposed epitope in H. ducreyi 35000 LOS and has been described elsewhere (60). The colony blot radioimmunoassay was performed as described previously (60) with MAb 3E6 culture supernatant as the source of the primary antibody.

Southern blot analysis.Purified H. ducreyi35000 chromosomal DNA was digested to completion with AflIII or HindIII, subjected to electrophoresis in a 0.7% (wt/vol) agarose gel, transferred to nitrocellulose paper, and probed by Southern blot analysis as previously described (51). A DNA probe comprising 330 bp internal to the H. ducreyi gmhA gene was constructed by PCR with the oligonucleotide primers P5 (5′-TCTTGTGGCAATGGCGGTTC-3′) and P6 (5′-AACATCTGCTAATCCTGCC-3′) (see Fig. 2). The 1.4-kbcat cartridge was also used as a probe for Southern blot analysis. These two DNA probes were radiolabeled with [α-32P]dCTP by use of a random-primer DNA labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.) and purified on Quick Spin columns (Boehringer).

Analysis of H. ducreyi LOS and E. coli LPS.Whole-cell lysate preparations of E. coli and H. ducreyi strains were treated with proteinase K as previously described (45), and the LOS or lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in these preparations was resolved by Tricine-SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (35). The resultant gels were either stained with silver (64) or transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for Western blot analysis. In the latter instance, nitrocellulose membranes were blocked with PBS containing 0.05% (vol/vol) Tween 20 (PBS-Tween) and incubated overnight at 4°C with MAb 3E6 culture supernatant. Filters were rinsed three times in PBS-Tween and incubated at room temperature for 2 h with a 1:2,000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G in PBS-Tween containing 0.1% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin. Filters were rinsed three times with PBS-Tween and then with PBS and developed with PBS containing 4-chloro-1-naphthol and hydrogen peroxide as previously described (30).

Analysis of outer membrane proteins.The Sarkosyl-insoluble fraction from H. ducreyi cell envelopes was prepared as described previously (33). Proteins present in this fraction were resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue.

Virulence testing.The temperature-dependent rabbit model for experimental chancroid was used to determine the relative virulence of the H. ducreyi strains used in this study (49). These studies involving rabbits were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee. Briefly, eight New Zealand White adult male rabbits were used in each experiment. These animals were housed at a room temperature of 15 to 17°C. All other housing procedures and animal care procedures were performed in accordance with the standards of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. Serial dilutions of theH. ducreyi strains were injected intradermally into each animal. Each animal was injected with at most three strains per experiment, with one injection of each dilution of the inoculum. Inocula were encoded prior to injection to prevent bias in the scoring of the resultant lesions. Lesion characteristics were scored as described previously (49) with the following numeric values: 0, no change; 1, erythema; 2, induration; 3, nodule; and 4, pustule or necrosis. Lesion scores were recorded on days 2, 4, and 7 postinfection. On day 7 postinfection, material excised from lesions caused by injection of 105 CFU of H. ducreyi was cultured on CA plates. Recovered organisms were subcultured onto CA supplemented with appropriate antimicrobial compounds to confirm the presence of the relevant antimicrobial resistance markers and were also tested by a colony blot radioimmunoassay with MAb 3E6 to confirm the LOS phenotype. Statistical analyses were performed as described previously (60, 61).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.The nucleotide sequence of the H. ducreyi gmhA gene was deposited at GenBank and assigned accession number AF045156 .

RESULTS

Identification and nucleotide sequence analysis of thegmhA gene of H. ducreyi 35000.A recombinant clone [E. coli DH5α(pHD250)] derived from an H. ducreyi 35000 genomic library constructed in plasmid vector pWKS30 was observed to give rise to translucent and opaque colonies (data not shown). Nucleotide sequence analysis of 1.6 kb of DNA at one end of the 18-kb H. ducreyi DNA insert in pHD250 detected an ORF (Fig.1) which encoded a predicted protein with homology to the gmhA gene product of H. influenzae (8). Expression of this H. influenzae gene, also designated isn (47), is essential for both the synthesis of wild-type LOS by H. influenzae type b and the expression of full virulence by this encapsulated pathogen (69). This 1.6-kb region of the DNA insert in pHD250 was found to contain two incomplete predicted ORFs and one complete predicted ORF (Fig. 1). The complete ORF, encoding the GmhA-like protein, was transcribed in the opposite direction from the other two ORFs (Fig. 1). Of the two incomplete ORFs, one (ORF A) encoded a protein with homology to a transcriptional regulatory protein (HI0410) of H. influenzae (20), and the other (ORF B) most closely resembled a hypothetical ORF (HI1586) ofH. influenzae (20). These two ORFs were not analyzed further.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Partial restriction map of the H. ducreyi 35000 chromosomal DNA insert in pHD250 and related plasmids. A and B indicate incomplete ORFs upstream and downstream ofgmhA, respectively. Restriction sites in parentheses indicate vector cloning sites. Arrows indicate the predicted direction of transcription. The cross-hatched bar beneath the gmhAgene indicates the 330-bp probe used for the Southern blot analysis shown in Fig. 4. Plasmid pHD251 contains a 1.6-kb PCR product. Acat cartridge was ligated into the Ppu10I site of pHD251 to construct pHD252. Plasmid pCR253 is pCR2.1 with a 1-kb PCR product containing the gmhA gene and flanking DNA; the small boxes on the ends of this insert represent nucleotides involved in cloning into the pCR2.1 vector. Plasmid pLS253 is pLS88 with the aforementioned 1-kb PCR product cloned into the EcoRI andSacI sites of this vector.

The H. ducreyi gmhA ORF was 585 nucleotides long (nucleotides 822 to 1406 in Fig. 2) and encoded a predicted protein with a calculated molecular mass of 21,302 Da (Fig. 2). BLAST searches of nonredundant DNA and protein databases revealed that the deduced amino acid sequence of the H. ducreyi GmhA protein was 87% identical and 93% similar to that of the GmhA protein of H. influenzae (8, 47) and 73% identical and 84% similar to that of the GmhA protein ofE. coli (7).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of the H. ducreyi 35000 gmhA gene and its predicted protein product; the sequence is from the DNA insert in pHD251 (Fig. 1). Lines above the sequence show putative −10 and −35 regions. A putative Shine-Dalgarno site is underlined. Oligonucleotide primers used in PCR are underlined and labeled P1 to P6 with directional arrows.

Complementation of an E. coli gmhA mutant with theH. ducreyi gmhA gene homolog.The high degree of identity between the GmhA protein of E. coli and the predicted protein encoded by the H. ducreyi gmhA gene homolog led us to determine whether this similarity was reflected at the functional level. To accomplish this, the entire gmhAgene of H. ducreyi 35000 was amplified by PCR and inserted into cloning vector pCR2.1, yielding recombinant plasmid pCR253. This plasmid was used to electroporate E. coliχ711, which has been shown to contain a chromosomal deletion of thegmhA gene (7). One of the resultant transformants [χ711(pCR253)] was selected for further study.

The LPS molecules present in proteinase K-treated whole-cell lysates of the relevant E. coli strains were analyzed by Tricine-SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3). As expected from a recent study (7), the truncated LPS of strain χ711 (Fig. 3, lane B) migrated much more rapidly in SDS-PAGE than did the LPS of strain χ705 (Fig. 3, lane A), the immediate parent of strain χ711 (14). The presence of vector pCR2.1 in χ711 did not affect the rate of migration of the LPS (Fig. 3, lane C). In contrast, the LPS of χ711(pCR253) (Fig. 3, lane D) migrated much more slowly, at a rate that was indistinguishable from that of the LPS of the χ705 parent strain. This latter result indicated that theH. ducreyi gmhA gene was able to complement anE. coli gmhA mutant.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

SDS-PAGE analysis of LPSs expressed bygmhA-deficient E. coli χ711 and relatedE. coli strains. LPS present in proteinase K-treated whole-cell lysates was resolved by Tricine-SDS-PAGE and stained with silver. Lanes: A, E. coli χ705 with a wild-typeE. coli gmhA gene; B, E. coli χ711; C, E. coli χ711 containing the pCR2.1 vector; D,E. coli χ711 containing pCR253 with the wild-typeH. ducreyi gmhA gene.

No recombinant E. coli strains containing pCR253 gave rise to the opaque and translucent colony variants originally observed with E. coli DH5α(pHD250). This result indicated that the genetic element(s) responsible for the opaque and translucent colony variation must be located in the remaining 16 kb ofH. ducreyi DNA in pHD250. Further analysis of this 16-kb region of H. ducreyi DNA was not performed in this study.

Construction of an isogenic H. ducreyi gmhAmutant.To confirm that the gmhA gene of H. ducreyi was involved in LOS biosynthesis, an isogenicgmhA mutant was constructed by allelic exchange. Acat cartridge was ligated into the Ppu10I restriction site of the gmhA gene in pHD251 (Fig. 1). The resultant plasmid, pHD252, was linearized by digestion withBsaI and used to electroporate H. ducreyi35000. Ten chloramphenicol-resistant H. ducreyitransformants were tested initially by PCR (with oligonucleotide primers P1 and P2 [Fig. 2]) to detect the occurrence of allelic exchange involving the replacement of the wild-type gmhAgene with the mutated allele containing the cat cartridge. Nine of these 10 chloramphenicol-resistant transformants yielded two or more PCR products, consistent with a single crossover event. Only one of these transformants, strain 35000.252, yielded a single PCR product with the correct predicted size of 3 kb, representing the disrupted 1.6-kb gmhA gene containing the 1.4-kb cat cartridge.

Southern blot analysis was performed to confirm that strain 35000.252 was an isogenic gmhA mutant. When chromosomal DNA from wild-type parent strain 35000 was probed with a 330-bp fragment from the H. ducreyi gmhA gene (Fig. 1), a 2.7-kbAflIII fragment hybridized with this probe (Fig.4, lane A). This same probe hybridized with a 4-kb AflIII fragment of chromosomal DNA from strain 35000.252 (Fig. 4, lane B). This result is consistent with the replacement of the wild-type gmhA gene with the mutated allele containing the 1.4-kb cat cartridge. When the cat cartridge was used as a probe, a 4-kbAflIII fragment from 35000.252 also hybridized with thiscat cartridge (Fig. 4, lane D). Chromosomal DNA from wild-type parent strain 35000 failed to hybridize with thecat cartridge probe (Fig. 4, lane C).

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Southern blot analysis of chromosomal DNA preparations from wild-type H. ducreyi 35000 (lanes A and C) and isogenic gmhA mutant 35000.252 (lanes B and D). Chromosomal DNAs were digested with AflIII, resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis, and probed with either a 330-bp PCR product derived from the H. ducreyi gmhA gene (lanes A and B) or the cat cartridge (lanes C and D). Size markers are on the left side of the figure.

Characterization of the isogenic gmhA mutant.Growth of wild-type strain 35000 and gmhA mutant 35000.252 in broth revealed that both strains grew at the same rates and to the same final densities (data not shown). The outer membrane of thegmhA mutant (Fig. 5, lane B) did not lack any proteins expressed by that of the wild-type parent strain (Fig. 5, lane A), although some major outer membrane proteins of these two strains differed in their relative abundances (Fig. 5, closed arrows). Two minor proteins present in thegmhA mutant (Fig. 5, open arrows) were absent in the wild-type parent strain; one of these may be the 26-kDa protein encoded by the cat gene.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Comparison of outer membrane proteins from wild-type and mutant H. ducreyi strains. Proteins present in the Sarkosyl-insoluble cell envelope fraction from wild-type parent strain 35000 (lane A) and isogenic gmhA mutant 35000.252 (lane B) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue. The three closed arrows indicate major outer membrane proteins whose relative abundances in these two strains were different. The two open arrows indicate the two proteins which were present in the mutant but absent in the wild-type parent strain. Molecular weight markers (in thousands [K]) are shown on the left side of the figure.

SDS-PAGE followed by silver staining showed that the LOS molecules of strains 35000, 35000.7, and 35000.252 all migrated at different rates. The LOS of wild-type strain 35000 migrated at the lowest rate (Fig.6, panel 1, lane A). The LOS of isogenicgmhA mutant 35000.252 (Fig. 6, panel 1, lane C) migrated the fastest, whereas the LOS of rfaK (lbgB) mutant 35000.7 (Fig. 6, panel 1, lane B) migrated at an intermediate rate. These results suggested that the oligosaccharide component of the LOS of the gmhA mutant was shorter than that of therfaK (lbgB) mutant. In Western blot analysis with MAb 3E6, wild-type strain 35000 was used as the positive control andrfaK (lbgB) mutant 35000.7 was used as the negative control (60). MAb 3E6 readily bound the LOS of strain 35000 (Fig. 6, panel 2, lane A) but failed to bind the LOS of both rfaK (lbgB) mutant 35000.7 andgmhA mutant 35000.252 (Fig. 6, panel 2, lanes B and C, respectively).

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Characterization of the LOSs expressed by wild-type, mutant, and complemented mutant strains of H. ducreyi. LOS present in proteinase K-treated whole-cell lysates was resolved by SDS-PAGE and either stained with silver (panel 1) or transferred to nitrocellulose for Western blot analysis with theH. ducreyi LOS-specific MAb 3E6 (panel 2). Lanes: A, wild-type strain 35000; B, rfaK (lbgB) mutant 35000.7; C, isogenic gmhA mutant 35000.252; D, 35000.252(pLS88); E, 35000.252(pLS253).

Complementation of the H. ducreyi gmhAmutant.To eliminate the possibility that an undetected secondary mutation was responsible for the altered LOS phenotype of theH. ducreyi gmhA mutant, complementation analysis was performed. The wild-type H. ducreyi gmhA gene was cloned into pLS88, yielding recombinant plasmid pLS253 (Fig. 1). Both the pLS88 vector and pLS253 were used to electroporate H. ducreyi gmhA mutant 35000.252. The presence of the vector alone in the H. ducreyi gmhA mutant [i.e., strain 35000.252(pLS88)] (Fig. 6, panels 1 and 2, lanes D) had no detectable effect on the migration rate or antigenic characteristics of the LOS relative to those of the LOS of strain 35000.252 (Fig. 6, panels 1 and 2, lanes C). In contrast, the presence of the wild-type H. ducreyi gmhA gene in trans in the gmhAmutant [i.e., strain 35000.252(pLS253)] (Fig. 6, panels 1 and 2, lanes E) resulted in the expression of a LOS molecule which had a migration rate and an MAb 3E6 reactivity indistinguishable from those of the wild-type LOS (Fig. 6, panels 1 and 2, lanes A).

Virulence expression by the gmhA mutant.IsogenicgmhA mutant 35000.252 was tested for the ability to produce dermal lesions in the temperature-dependent rabbit model (49). In two independent experiments, mean lesion scores obtained with wild-type strain 35000 were consistently higher than those obtained with the gmhA mutant for all sampling times and inocula (Table 2, experiments A and B). These apparent differences in lesion scores were highly significant (P ≤ 0.0001). On day 7 postinfection, viableH. ducreyi organisms were recovered only from lesions produced by wild-type strain 35000.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Lesion formation by wild-type, gmhA mutant, and complemented gmhA mutant strains of H. ducreyi in the temperature-dependent rabbit modela

A third virulence test was performed to demonstrate that complementation with the wild-type H. ducreyi gmhA gene restored the virulence of the gmhA mutant. The gmhA mutant 35000.252(pLS88) containing the plasmid vector alone showed the same markedly decreased level of virulence as the original gmhA mutant, 35000.252 (Table 2, experiment C), whereas complemented gmhA mutant 35000.252(pLS253), with the wild-type H. ducreyi gmhA gene present in trans, had the same level of virulence as wild-type parent strain 35000 (Table 2, experiment C). No viable H. ducreyi organisms were recovered from the lesions produced by the gmhA mutant containing the vector alone. Viable H. ducreyi organisms were recovered at the same frequencies (i.e., five of eight rabbits) from lesions produced by both wild-type parent strain 35000 and complementedgmhA mutant 35000.252(pLS253). The identity of theH. ducreyi organisms recovered from lesions produced by strain 35000.252(pLS253) was confirmed by colony blot analysis with MAb 3E6, by antimicrobial resistance testing, and by Southern blotting (data not shown). This latter Southern blot analysis was performed to confirm that the wild-type gmhA gene in pLS253 had not been exchanged into the chromosome in place of the mutant allele.

Conservation of the gmhA gene among H. ducreyi strains.Southern blot analysis of 11 strains ofH. ducreyi isolated in seven different countries was performed with a 330-bp fragment from the gmhA gene ofH. ducreyi 35000 (Fig. 1) as a probe. Strains 35000, Hd9, Hd12, Hd13, 512, 1145, 1151, 1352, Cha-1, R018, and STD101 (60) all showed hybridization of a 2.7-kb AflIII fragment of chromosomal DNA to the probe, indicating the presence of the gmhA gene in all 11 strains (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

It is well accepted that the LPS or LOS molecules present in the outer membranes of gram-negative pathogens play a critical role in disease caused by these organisms because of the inflammatory ability of these amphipathic molecules (48). Not unexpectedly, there is now ample evidence that the LOS of H. ducreyi is capable of inducing the formation of dermal lesions even in the absence of viable organisms (10, 65). Efforts to determine structure-function relationships ofH. ducreyi LOS have been assisted by recent advances in knowledge about the physical structure of this molecule (1, 21, 37, 38, 56). However, still relatively little is known about what other role(s) LOS may play in the pathogenesis of chancroid beyond provoking a significant inflammatory response.

Mutant analysis of the LOSs of other pathogens, includingNeisseria gonorrhoeae and H. influenzae, has been instrumental in establishing the relevance of the oligosaccharide component of LOS to the pathogenesis of the diseases caused by these organisms (13, 28, 39, 46, 47, 59). Considerable evidence derived from in vitro experiments has indicated that the oligosaccharide component of the LOS of N. gonorrhoeaecontributes to the virulence of this mucosal surface pathogen (54, 55). Similarly, the use of relevant animal models has shown that the oligosaccharide component of H. influenzae type b LOS is essential for virulence expression by this encapsulated pathogen (13, 28, 31, 68, 69). More recently, mutant analysis was used to demonstrate the effect of changes in both the lipid A structure and the phosphorylation state of the LOS oligosaccharide on the virulence of nontypeable H. influenzae in an animal model (15).

The first indication that LOS oligosaccharide structure was important in the ability of H. ducreyi to produce disease was obtained over a decade ago (41, 42) in studies which compared different strains or variants of H. ducreyifor their virulence in a rabbit model. These experiments indicated that changes in the migration characteristics of the LOS in SDS-PAGE, which most likely reflected differences in LOS oligosaccharide composition, could be correlated with virulence differences in animals. Mutant analysis of the involvement of H. ducreyi LOS in virulence expression did not begin until relatively recently, when two different laboratories constructed rfaK (lbgB) mutants of H. ducreyi which expressed an LOS with a truncated oligosaccharide (9, 21, 60). Lack of expression of the rfaK (lbgB) gene product adversely affected the ability of H. ducreyi to both attach to and invade human keratinocytes in vitro (9, 21) but did not have a statistically significant effect on the ability of H. ducreyi to produce skin lesions in the temperature-dependent rabbit model (60).

It is particularly relevant to the present study that the first LOS mutant (originally designated I69) of H. influenzaetype b which was shown to exhibit reduced virulence in the infant rat model (69) was subsequently found to express a LOS molecule comprised of only lipid A and a single phosphorylated 2-keto-3-deoxyoctulosonic acid residue (26). This LOS molecule, which lacked an oligosaccharide moiety, migrated much more rapidly in SDS-PAGE than did the LOS molecule of the wild-type parent strain (69). Subsequent studies revealed that the I69 mutant possessed a single-base-pair deletion in a previously unidentified gene, designated isn (47). Very shortly after this discovery, it was found that the H. influenzae isn gene was a homolog of the E. coli gmhA gene (previously designated lpcA), which encodes a phosphoheptose isomerase (7, 8). This enzyme catalyzes the conversion of sedoheptulose-7-phosphate intod-glycero-d-mannoheptose-7-phosphate (7), which is essential for the synthesis of the ADP-l-glycero-d-mannoheptose precursor involved directly in the synthesis of the oligosaccharide (17).

The H. ducreyi gmhA mutant characterized in the present study expressed a LOS that migrated more rapidly in SDS-PAGE than the LOS of the wild-type parent strain. Moreover, the LOS of thisH. ducreyi gmhA mutant also migrated more rapidly than the truncated LOS expressed by an rfaK (lbgB) mutant (60). Consistent with this rapid migration phenotype in SDS-PAGE, the LOS of the H. ducreyi gmhA mutant lost reactivity with MAb 3E6, which is directed against a surface-exposed epitope of H. ducreyi LOS (25). Expression of the H. ducreyi gmhA gene product in trans in E. coli χ711, a strain with a gmhA deletion, resulted in the synthesis of an LPS which migrated at a rate indistinguishable from that of the LPS of theE. coli parent strain. This same E. coli gmhA mutant was also complemented by the wild-type H. influenzae gmhA gene (8). It can be inferred from these data that the gmhA mutation in H. ducreyiresulted in the expression of a LOS molecule with a severely truncated oligosaccharide moiety and that the product of the H. ducreyi gmhA gene is a homolog of both the E. coliand the H. influenzae GmhA proteins.

Interestingly, the H. ducreyi gmhA mutant exhibited some changes in the relative abundances of a few major outer membrane proteins (Fig. 5), similar to the changes described for deep rough LPS mutants of enteric bacteria (19, 34, 40). Whether these modest alterations in protein expression could have affected virulence expression by the gmhA mutant cannot be determined directly from the available data. However, an isogenic mompmutant of H. ducreyi which lacked the ability to express one of the two OmpA-like major outer membrane proteins of this organism (33) was shown to be fully virulent in the temperature-dependent rabbit model (32a). This latter finding suggests that the observed changes in the relative abundances of the three outer membrane proteins in thegmhA mutant (Fig. 5) were not likely to have caused a reduction in virulence.

Southern blot analysis revealed that the gmhA gene is apparently well conserved among H. ducreyi strains. This finding is not surprising, especially in view of the fact thatgmhA is known to be highly conserved among enteric bacteria (7). It is also interesting to note that the H. ducreyi gmhA gene, like the rfaK (lbgB) gene of this pathogen (21, 60), is not located within a cluster of other genes whose products are likely directly involved in LOS biosynthesis. The H. ducreyi rfaK (lbgB) gene is located adjacent to another gene (lbgA) whose expression is essential for the synthesis of wild-type LOS, but theH. ducreyi genes flanking the lbgAB genes do not encode proteins predicted to be involved in LOS expression (60). This situation is in contrast to the multiple, closely linked genes involved in enteric core LPS biosynthesis (i.e., theE. coli rfa genes) (32, 53). Similarly, theH. influenzae gmhA gene is not located among other LOS genes but instead is located between genes for two different ABC transport systems. Relative to gmhA in H. influenzae (47), several dpp genes essential for efficient dipeptide transport are located immediately upstream, whereas several art gene homologs, which are likely involved in arginine uptake, are located immediately downstream.

Complementation analysis (Fig. 6) was used to confirm that theH. ducreyi gmhA mutant did not possess a secondary mutation(s) which could have affected LOS expression. Analysis of the growth rate of this mutant indicated that, in broth medium in vitro, the absence of gmhA gene expression did not affect detectably either the rate or the extent of growth. In contrast, the absence of the gmhA gene product had a pronounced effect on H. ducreyi in vivo. In the temperature-dependent rabbit model, the H. ducreyi gmhA mutant was markedly less able than the wild-type parent strain to produce dermal lesions (Table 2). In addition, this same mutant could not be recovered from lesions at 7 days postinfection, whereas viable cells of the wild-type parent strain were present in almost all of the lesions sampled. Restoration of GmhA expression, accomplished by provision of the wild-type H. ducreyi gmhA gene in trans, resulted in a level of virulence equivalent to that obtained with the wild-type parent strain.

It has been well established that H. influenzae type b LOS mutants with altered (i.e., shortened) oligosaccharide chains usually exhibit decreased virulence in the infant rat model (13, 28, 31, 68). In fact, the H. influenzae type bisn (i.e., I69) mutant is one of the least virulent of all of the LOS mutants tested to date (28). The H. ducreyi gmhA mutant in the present study was also less virulent than its wild-type parent strain. This significant diminution in the virulence of the H. ducreyi gmhA mutant is in marked contrast to the effect of the rfaK (lbgB) mutation on the virulence of H. ducreyi(60). The H. ducreyi rfaK (lbgB) mutant possessed a less truncated LOS (21) (relative to that of the gmhA mutant) and did not exhibit a statistically significant reduction in virulence, although there was an apparent trend in this direction (60). While it could be inferred from these data that the extent of truncation of the LOS oligosaccharide moiety, as evidenced by LOS migration rate in SDS-PAGE, might be inversely related to virulence potential in H. ducreyi, results derived from virulence testing of LOS mutants ofH. influenzae type b indicated the inherent inaccuracy of such a generalization (13, 28). Determination of whether the lack of GmhA expression has an effect on the virulence ofH. ducreyi for humans will necessarily have to await testing of the gmhA mutant in the human challenge model for experimental chancroid (57, 58).

In conclusion, we have identified the H. ducreyi gmhAgene homolog. Expression of the gmhA gene product was shown to be essential for the synthesis of wild-type LOS by H. ducreyi. Insertional inactivation of the gmhA gene had an adverse effect on the virulence of H. ducreyi 35000 in the temperature-dependent rabbit model for experimental chancroid. The availability of this cloned gene and the related isogenicH. ducreyi mutant, together with the rfaK(lbgB) mutants of H. ducreyi (21, 60), should facilitate future studies on structure-function relationships within the oligosaccharide portion of H. ducreyi LOS.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant AI-32011. B.A.B. was supported by U.S. Public Health Service training grant RR-07031.

E. coli χ705 and χ711 were generously provided by Roy Curtiss. The cat cartridge used in this study was constructed by Bruce A. Green. We thank Christine Ward and David Lewis for helpful discussions and for assistance with the animal model. We also appreciate the insights into the relationship betweengmhA gene expression and LOS structure provided by Joanna Brooke.

Notes

Editor: P. E. Orndorff

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 9 February 1998.
    • Returned for modification 18 March 1998.
    • Accepted 4 June 1998.
  • Copyright © 1998 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Ahmed H. J.,
    2. Frisk A.,
    3. Mansson J.-E.,
    4. Schweda E. K. H.,
    5. Lagergard T.
    Structurally defined epitopes of Haemophilus ducreyi lipooligosaccharides recognized by monoclonal antibodies.Infect. Immun.65199731513158
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Alfa M. J.,
    2. DeGagne P. A.,
    3. Totten P. A.
    Haemophilus ducreyi hemolysin acts as a contact cytotoxin and damages human foreskin fibroblasts in cell culture.Infect. Immun.64199623492352
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Altschul S. F.,
    2. Gish W.,
    3. Miller W.,
    4. Myers E. W.,
    5. Lipman D. J.
    Basic local alignment search tool.J. Mol. Biol.2151990403410
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Ausubel F. M.,
    2. Brent R.,
    3. Kingston R. E.,
    4. Moore D. D.,
    5. Smith J. A.,
    6. Seidman J. G.,
    7. Struhl K.
    Current protocols in molecular biology. 1990 Green Publishing Associates and Wiley Interscience New York, N.Y
  5. 5.↵
    1. Barcak G. J.,
    2. Chandler M. S.,
    3. Redfield R. J.,
    4. Tomb J.
    Genetic systems in Haemophilus influenzae.Methods Enzymol.2041991321342
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brentjens R. J.,
    2. Ketterer M.,
    3. Apicella M. A.,
    4. Spinola S. M.
    Fine tangled pili expressed by Haemophilus ducreyi are a novel class of pili.J. Bacteriol.1781996808816
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Brooke J. S.,
    2. Valvano M. A.
    Biosynthesis of inner core lipopolysaccharide in enteric bacteria: identification and characterization of a conserved phosphoheptose isomerase.J. Biol. Chem.271199617
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Brooke J. S.,
    2. Valvano M. A.
    Molecular cloning of the Haemophilus influenzae gmhA (lpcA) gene encoding a phosphoheptose isomerase required for lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis.J. Bacteriol.178199633393341
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Campagnari A. A.,
    2. Karalus R.,
    3. Apicella M. A.,
    4. Melaugh W.,
    5. Lesse A. J.,
    6. Gibson B. W.
    Use of pyocin to select a Haemophilus ducreyi variant defective in lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis.Infect. Immun.62199423792386
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Campagnari A. A.,
    2. Wild L. M.,
    3. Griffiths G.,
    4. Karalus R. J.,
    5. Wirth M. A.,
    6. Spinola S. M.
    Role of lipopolysaccharides in experimental dermal lesions caused by Haemophilus ducreyi.Infect. Immun.59199126012608
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Carson S. D. B.,
    2. Thomas C. E.,
    3. Elkins C.
    Cloning and sequencing of a Haemophilus ducreyi fur homolog.Gene1761996125129
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Cope L. D.,
    2. Lumbley S. R.,
    3. Latimer J. L.,
    4. Klesney-Tait J.,
    5. Stevens M. K.,
    6. Johnson L. S.,
    7. Purven M.,
    8. Munson R. S. Jr.,
    9. Lagergard T.,
    10. Radolf J. D.,
    11. Hansen E. J.
    A diffusible cytotoxin of Haemophilus ducreyi.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94199740564061
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Cope L. D.,
    2. Yogev R.,
    3. Mertsola J.,
    4. Argyle J. C.,
    5. McCracken G. H. Jr.,
    6. Hansen E. J.
    Effect of mutations in lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis genes on virulence of Haemophilus influenzae type b.Infect. Immun.58199023432351
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Curtiss R. III,
    2. Charamella L. J.,
    3. Stallions D. R.,
    4. Mays J. A.
    Parental functions during conjugation in Escherichia coli K-12.Bacteriol. Rev.321968320348
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. DeMaria T. F.,
    2. Apicella M. A.,
    3. Nichols W. A.,
    4. Leake E. R.
    Evaluation of the virulence of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae lipooligosaccharide htrB and rfaD mutants in the chinchilla model of otitis media.Infect. Immun.65199744314435
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Dixon L. G.,
    2. Albritton W. L.,
    3. Willson P. J.
    An analysis of the complete nucleotide sequence of the Haemophilus ducreyi broad-host-range plasmid pLS88.Plasmid321994228232
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Eidels L.,
    2. Osborn M. J.
    Phosphoheptose isomerase, first enzyme in the biosynthesis of aldoheptose in Salmonella typhimurium.J. Biol. Chem.249197456425648
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Elkins C.,
    2. Chen C.-J.,
    3. Thomas C. E.
    Characterization of the hgbA locus encoding a hemoglobin receptor from Haemophilus ducreyi.Infect. Immun.63199521942200
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ferro-Luzzi Ames G.,
    2. Spudich E. N.,
    3. Nikaido H.
    Protein composition of the outer membrane of Salmonella typhimurium: effect of lipopolysaccharide mutations.J. Bacteriol.1171974406416
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fleischmann R. D.,
    2. Adams M. D.,
    3. White O.,
    4. Clayton R. A.,
    5. Kirkness E. F.,
    6. Kerlavage A. R.,
    7. Bult C. J.,
    8. Tomb J.-F.,
    9. Dougherty B. A.,
    10. Merrick J. M.,
    11. McKenney K.,
    12. Sutton G.,
    13. FitzHugh W.,
    14. Fields C.,
    15. Gocayne J. D.,
    16. Scott J.,
    17. Shirley R.,
    18. Liu L.-I.,
    19. Glodek A.,
    20. Kelley J. M.,
    21. Weidman J. F.,
    22. Phillips C. A.,
    23. Spriggs T.,
    24. Hedblom E.,
    25. Cotton M. D.,
    26. Utterback R. C.,
    27. Hanna M. C.,
    28. Nguyen D. T.,
    29. Saudek D. M.,
    30. Brandon R. C.,
    31. Fine L. D.,
    32. Frichman J. L.,
    33. Fuhrmann J. L.,
    34. Geoghagen N. S. M.,
    35. Gnehm C. L.,
    36. McDonald L. A.,
    37. Small K. V.,
    38. Fraser C. M.,
    39. Smith H. O.,
    40. Venter J. C.
    Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd.Science2691995496512
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Gibson B. W.,
    2. Campagnari A. A.,
    3. Melaugh W.,
    4. Phillips N. J.,
    5. Apicella M. A.,
    6. Grass S.,
    7. Wang J.,
    8. Palmer K. L.,
    9. Munson R. S. Jr.
    Characterization of a transposon Tn916-generated mutant of Haemophilus ducreyi 35000 defective in lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis.J. Bacteriol.179199750625071
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Gibson B. W.,
    2. Melaugh W.,
    3. Phillips N. J.,
    4. Apicella M. A.,
    5. Campagnari A. A.,
    6. Griffiss J. M.
    Investigation of the structural heterogeneity of lipooligosaccharides from pathogenic Haemophilus and Neisseria species and of R-type lipopolysaccharides from Salmonella typhimurium by electrospray mass spectrometry.J. Bacteriol.175199327022712
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.
    1. Hammond G. W.,
    2. Lian C. J.,
    3. Wilt J. C.,
    4. Ronald A. R.
    Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus ducreyi.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.131978608612
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Hansen E. J.,
    2. Latimer J. L.,
    3. Thomas S. E.,
    4. Helminen M. E.,
    5. Albritton W. L.,
    6. Radolf J. D.
    Use of electroporation to construct isogenic mutants of Haemophilus ducreyi.J. Bacteriol.174199254425449
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hansen E. J.,
    2. Lumbley S. R.,
    3. Saxen H.,
    4. Kern K.,
    5. Cope L. D.,
    6. Radolf J. D.
    Detection of Haemophilus ducreyi lipooligosaccharide by means of an immunolimulus assay.J. Immunol. Methods1851995225235
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Helander I. M.,
    2. Lindner B.,
    3. Brade H.,
    4. Altmann K.,
    5. Lindberg A. A.,
    6. Rietschel E. T.,
    7. Zahringer U.
    Chemical structure of the lipopolysaccharide of Haemophilus influenzae strain I-69 Rd−/b+: description of a novel deep-rough chemotype.Eur. J. Biochem.1771988483492
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Hennessy K. J.,
    2. Landolo J. J.,
    3. Fenwick B. W.
    Serotype identification of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction.J. Clin. Microbiol.31199311551159
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Hood D. W.,
    2. Deadman M. E.,
    3. Allen T.,
    4. Masoud H.,
    5. Martin A.,
    6. Brisson J. R.,
    7. Fleischmann R.,
    8. Venter J. C.,
    9. Richards J. C.,
    10. Moxon E. R.
    Use of the complete genome sequence information of Haemophilus influenzae strain Rd to investigate lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis.Mol. Microbiol.221996951965
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. Inzana T. J.,
    2. Corbeil L. B.
    Development of a defined medium for Haemophilus somnus isolated from cattle.Am. J. Vet. Res.481987366369
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Kimura A.,
    2. Gulig P. A.,
    3. McCracken G. H. Jr.,
    4. Loftus T. A.,
    5. Hansen E. J.
    A minor high-molecular-weight outer membrane protein of Haemophilus influenzae type b is a protective antigen.Infect. Immun.471985253259
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Kimura A.,
    2. Hansen E. J.
    Antigenic and phenotypic variations of Haemophilus influenzae type b lipopolysaccharide and their relationship to virulence.Infect. Immun.5019866979
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Klena J. D.,
    2. Pradel E.,
    3. Schnaitman C. A.
    Comparison of lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis genes rfaK, rfaL, rfaY, and rfaZ of Escherichia coli K-12 and Salmonella typhimurium.J. Bacteriol.174199247464752
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 32a.↵
    Klesney-Tait, J., and E. J. Hansen.Unpublished data.
  34. 33.↵
    1. Klesney-Tait J.,
    2. Hiltke T. J.,
    3. Spinola S. M.,
    4. Radolf J. D.,
    5. Hansen E. J.
    The major outer membrane protein of Haemophilus ducreyi consists of two OmpA homologs.J. Bacteriol.179199717641773
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 34.↵
    1. Koplow J.,
    2. Goldfine H.
    Alterations in the outer membrane of the cell envelope of heptose-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli.J. Bacteriol.1171974527543
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 35.↵
    1. Lesse A. J.,
    2. Campagnari A. A.,
    3. Bittner W. E.,
    4. Apicella M. A.
    Increased resolution of lipopolysaccharides and lipooligosaccharides utilizing tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.J. Immunol. Methods1261990109117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 36.↵
    1. Mandrell R. E.,
    2. McLaughlin R.,
    3. Kwaik Y. A.,
    4. Lesse A. J.,
    5. Yamasaki R.,
    6. Gibson B.,
    7. Spinola S. M.,
    8. Apicella M. A.
    Lipopolysaccharides (LOS) of some Haemophilus species mimic human glycosphingolipids, and some LOS are sialylated.Infect. Immun.60199213221328
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 37.↵
    1. Melaugh W.,
    2. Campagnari A. A.,
    3. Gibson B. W.
    The lipooligosaccharides of Haemophilus ducreyi are highly sialylated.J. Bacteriol.1781996564570
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 38.↵
    1. Melaugh W.,
    2. Phillips N. J.,
    3. Campagnari A. A.,
    4. Tullius M. V.,
    5. Gibson B. W.
    Structure of the major oligosaccharide from the lipooligosaccharide of Haemophilus ducreyi strain 35000 and evidence of additional glycoforms.Biochemistry3319941307013078
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 39.↵
    1. Nichols W. A.,
    2. Gibson B. W.,
    3. Melaugh W.,
    4. Lee N.-G.,
    5. Sunshine M.,
    6. Apicella M. A.
    Identification of the ADP-l-glycero-d-manno-heptose-6-epimerase (rfaD) and heptosyltransferase II (rfaF) biosynthesis genes from nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae 2019.Infect. Immun.65199713771386
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 40.↵
    1. Nikaido H.,
    2. Vaara M.
    Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability.Microbiol. Rev.491985132
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  42. 41.↵
    1. Odumeru J. A.,
    2. Wiseman G. M.,
    3. Ronald A. R.
    Role of lipopolysaccharide and complement in susceptibility of Haemophilus ducreyi to human serum.Infect. Immun.501985495499
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. 42.↵
    1. Odumeru J. A.,
    2. Wiseman G. M.,
    3. Ronald A. R.
    Relationship between lipopolysaccharide composition and virulence of Haemophilus ducreyi.J. Med. Microbiol.231987155162
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 43.↵
    1. Palmer K. L.,
    2. Goldman W. E.,
    3. Munson R. S. Jr.
    An isogenic haemolysin-deficient mutant of Haemophilus ducreyi lacks the ability to produce cytopathic effects on human foreskin fibroblasts.Mol. Microbiol.2119961319
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 44.↵
    1. Parsons L. M.,
    2. Limberger R. J.,
    3. Shayegani M.
    Alterations in levels of DnaK and GroEL result in diminished survival and adherence of stressed Haemophilus ducreyi.Infect. Immun.65199724132419
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 45.↵
    1. Patrick C. C.,
    2. Kimura A.,
    3. Jackson M. A.,
    4. Hermanstorfer L.,
    5. Hood A.,
    6. McCracken G. H. Jr.,
    7. Hansen E. J.
    Antigenic characterization of the oligosaccharide portion of the lipooligosaccharide of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae.Infect. Immun.55198729022911
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 46.↵
    1. Phillips N. J.,
    2. McLaughlin R.,
    3. Miller T. J.,
    4. Apicella M. A.,
    5. Gibson B. W.
    Characterization of two transposon mutants from Haemophilus influenzae type b with altered lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis.Biochemistry35199659375947
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 47.↵
    1. Preston A.,
    2. Maskell D. J.,
    3. Johnson A.,
    4. Moxon E. R.
    Altered lipopolysaccharide characteristic of the I69 phenotype in Haemophilus influenzae results from mutations in a novel gene, isn.J. Bacteriol.1781996396402
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 48.↵
    1. Proctor R. A.,
    2. Denlinger L. C.,
    3. Bertics P. J.
    Liposaccharide and bacterial virulence Virulence mechanisms of bacterial pathogens. Roth J. A., Bolin C. A., Brogden K. A., Minion F. C., Wannemuehler M. J. 1995 173 194 ASM Press Washington, D.C
  50. 49.↵
    1. Purcell B. K.,
    2. Richardson J. A.,
    3. Radolf J. D.,
    4. Hansen E. J.
    A temperature-dependent rabbit model for production of dermal lesions by Haemophilus ducreyi.J. Infect. Dis.1641991359367
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 50.↵
    1. Purven M.,
    2. Frisk A.,
    3. Lonnroth I.,
    4. Lagergard T.
    Purification and identification of Haemophilus ducreyi cytotoxin by use of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody.Infect. Immun.65199734963499
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 51.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  53. 52.↵
    1. San Mateo L. R.,
    2. Hobbs M. M.,
    3. Kawula T. H.
    Periplasmic copper-zinc superoxide dismutase protects Haemophilus ducreyi from exogenous superoxide.Mol. Microbiol.271998391404
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 53.↵
    1. Schnaitman C. A.,
    2. Klena J. D.
    Genetics of lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis in enteric bacteria.Microbiol. Rev.571993655682
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 54.↵
    1. Schneider H.,
    2. Schmidt K. A.,
    3. Skillman D. R.,
    4. van de Verg L.,
    5. Warren R. L.
    Sialylation lessens the infectivity of Neisseria gonorrhoeae MS11mkC.J. Infect. Dis.173199614221427
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 55.↵
    1. Schwan E. T.,
    2. Robertson B. D.,
    3. Brade H. B.,
    4. van Putten J. P. M.
    Gonococcal rfaF mutants express Rd2 chemotype LPS and do not enter epithelial host cells.Mol. Microbiol.151995267275
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 56.↵
    1. Schweda E. K. H.,
    2. Jonasson J. A.,
    3. Jansson P.-E.
    Structural studies of lipooligosaccharides from Haemophilus ducreyi ITM 5535, ITM 3147, and a fresh clinical isolate, ACY1: evidence for intrastrain heterogeneity with the production of mutually exclusive sialylated or elongated glycoforms.J. Bacteriol.177199553165321
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. 57.↵
    1. Spinola S. M.,
    2. Orazi A.,
    3. Arno J. N.,
    4. Fortney K.,
    5. Kotylo P.,
    6. Chen C.-Y.,
    7. Campagnari A. A.,
    8. Hood A. F.
    Haemophilus ducreyi elicits a cutaneous infiltrate of CD4 cells during experimental human infection.J. Infect. Dis.1731996394402
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 58.↵
    1. Spinola S. M.,
    2. Wild L. M.,
    3. Apicella M. A.,
    4. Gaspari A. A.,
    5. Campagnari A. A.
    Experimental human infection with Haemophilus ducreyi.J. Infect. Dis.169199411461150
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 59.↵
    1. Stephens D. S.,
    2. McAllister C. F.,
    3. Zhou D.,
    4. Lee F. K.,
    5. Apicella M. A.
    Tn916-generated lipooligosaccharide mutants of Neisseria meningitidis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae.Infect. Immun.62199429472952
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 60.↵
    1. Stevens M. K.,
    2. Klesney-Tait J.,
    3. Lumbley S. R.,
    4. Walters K. A.,
    5. Joffe A. M.,
    6. Radolf J. D.,
    7. Hansen E. J.
    Identification of tandem genes involved in lipooligosaccharide expression by Haemophilus ducreyi.Infect. Immun.651997651660
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 61.↵
    1. Stevens M. K.,
    2. Porcella S.,
    3. Klesney-Tait J.,
    4. Lumbley S. R.,
    5. Thomas S. E.,
    6. Norgard M. V.,
    7. Radolf J. D.,
    8. Hansen E. J.
    A hemoglobin-binding outer membrane protein is involved in virulence expression by Haemophilus ducreyi in an animal model.Infect. Immun.64199617241735
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 62.↵
    1. Templeton N. S.
    The polymerase chain reaction: history, methods, and applications.Diagn. Mol. Pathol.119925872
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. 63.↵
    1. Trees D. L.,
    2. Morse S. A.
    Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi: an update.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.81995357375
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. 64.↵
    1. Tsai C. M.,
    2. Frasch C. E.
    A sensitive silver stain for detecting lipopolysaccharide in polyacrylamide gels.Anal. Biochem.1191982115119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. 65.↵
    1. Tuffrey M.,
    2. Alexander F.,
    3. Ballard R. C.,
    4. Taylor-Robinson D.
    Characterization of skin lesions in mice following intradermal inoculation of Haemophilus ducreyi.J. Exp. Pathol.711990233244
    OpenUrl
  67. 66.↵
    1. Tullius M. V.,
    2. Munson R. S. Jr.,
    3. Wang J.,
    4. Gibson B. W.
    Purification, cloning, and expression of a cytidine 5′-monophosphate N-acetylneuraminic acid synthetase from Haemophilus ducreyi.J. Biol. Chem.27119961537315380
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. 67.↵
    1. Wang R. F.,
    2. Kushner S. R.
    Construction of versatile low-copy-number vectors for cloning, sequencing and gene expression in Escherichia coli.Gene1001991195199
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  69. 68.↵
    1. Weiser J. N.,
    2. Williams A.,
    3. Moxon E. R.
    Phase-variable lipopolysaccharide structures enhance the invasive capacity of Haemophilus influenzae.Infect. Immun.58199034553457
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. 69.↵
    1. Zwahlen A.,
    2. Rubin L. G.,
    3. Connelly C. J.,
    4. Inzana T. J.,
    5. Moxon E. R.
    Alteration of the cell wall of Haemophilus influenzae type b by transformation with cloned DNA: association with attenuated virulence.J. Infect. Dis.1521985485492
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Involvement of the Haemophilus ducreyi gmhA Gene Product in Lipooligosaccharide Expression and Virulence
Beth A. Bauer, Marla K. Stevens, Eric J. Hansen
Infection and Immunity Sep 1998, 66 (9) 4290-4298; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.9.4290-4298.1998

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Involvement of the Haemophilus ducreyi gmhA Gene Product in Lipooligosaccharide Expression and Virulence
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Involvement of the Haemophilus ducreyi gmhA Gene Product in Lipooligosaccharide Expression and Virulence
Beth A. Bauer, Marla K. Stevens, Eric J. Hansen
Infection and Immunity Sep 1998, 66 (9) 4290-4298; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.9.4290-4298.1998
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Aldose-Ketose Isomerases
Bacterial Proteins
Haemophilus ducreyi
Lipopolysaccharides

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522