Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PATHOGENESIS

Characterization of a WaaF (RfaF) Homolog Expressed by Haemophilus ducreyi

Beth A. Bauer, Sheryl R. Lumbley, Eric J. Hansen
Beth A. Bauer
Department of Microbiology 1 and Division of Comparative Medicine, Department of Pathology, 2 University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9048
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sheryl R. Lumbley
Department of Microbiology 1 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric J. Hansen
Department of Microbiology 1 and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Haemophilus ducreyi lipooligosaccharide (LOS) is capable of inducing an inflammatory response in skin (A. A. Campagnari, L. M. Wild, G. Griffiths, R. J. Karalus, M. A. Wirth, and S. M. Spinola, Infect. Immun. 59:2601–2608, 1991) and likely contributes to the virulence of this sexually transmitted pathogen (B. A. Bauer, M. K. Stevens, and E. J. Hansen, Infect. Immun. 68:4290–4298, 1998). An open reading frame in H. ducreyi 35000 was found to encode a predicted protein that was 59% identical to the protein product of the rfaF(waaF) gene of Salmonella typhimurium. TheH. ducreyi waaF gene was able to complement an S. typhimurium rfaF (waaF) mutant, a result which confirmed the identity of this gene. In contrast to therfaF (waaF) gene of enteric bacteria, theH. ducreyi waaF gene was not located adjacent to other genes involved in lipopolysaccharide expression. Inactivation of theH. ducreyi waaF gene by insertion mutagenesis resulted in expression of a LOS that migrated much faster than wild-type LOS in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The LOS of this mutant also did not bind a monoclonal antibody directed against a cell surface-exposed epitope of wild-type H. ducreyi LOS. Testing of the wild-type H. ducreyi strain and its isogenicwaaF mutant in the temperature-dependent rabbit model for dermal lesion production by H. ducreyi revealed that thiswaaF mutant was less virulent than the wild-type parent strain. Complementation of the H. ducreyi waaF mutant with the wild-type H. ducreyi waaF gene resulted in expression of both wild-type LOS and wild-type virulence by this mutant.

Haemophilus ducreyi, a gram-negative coccobacillus, is the organism which causes the sexually transmitted disease known as chancroid. This ulcerogenital disease is endemic in some developing countries in Africa and Asia, and outbreaks of chancroid in the United States have apparently increased since 1980 (76). Because genital ulcer diseases, including chancroid, have been well established to be significant risk factors for transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (76), identification of the virulence factors of H. ducreyi has become the subject of increased research activity over the past 10 years.

Despite this research effort, little is known about the H. ducreyi gene products that are directly involved in the development of genital ulcers. Only recently have putative virulence factors of this organism been identified; they include a hemolysin with cytotoxic activity (2, 47-50, 74), a second cytotoxin (13, 56), a hemoglobin-binding outer membrane protein (16, 69), a novel pilus (7), and both a copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (39, 60) and a SodA homolog (61). In addition, gene products which have the potential to directly or indirectly regulate expression of H. ducreyivirulence factors have been described (12, 51), and there have been new model systems introduced for the study of the interaction of H. ducreyi with host cells (8, 28, 29, 38, 72, 73,75).

As might be expected, the lipooligosaccharide (LOS) present in theH. ducreyi outer membrane has potent inflammatory activity (11). Structurally, H. ducreyi LOS has been shown to be very similar to the LOSs of other gram-negative mucosal surface pathogens, including Neisseria gonorrhoeae andHaemophilus influenzae (10, 22, 41-43, 64). However, only recently have attempts been made to address the possible involvement of the oligosaccharide portion of H. ducreyi LOS in the pathogenesis of chancroid. These efforts stemmed from the identification, cloning, and sequencing of several H. ducreyi genes whose encoded proteins are directly or indirectly involved in LOS expression (6, 21, 68, 79). These proteins include cytidine-5′-monophosphate N -acetylneuraminic acid synthetase, an enzyme involved in the ability of this organism to sialylate its LOS (42, 79), as well as homologs of RfaK (LbgB) (heptosyltransferase) (21, 68) and GmhA (phosphoheptose isomerase) (6). Only a few H. ducreyi mutants defective in LOS expression have been characterized (6, 9, 21, 68), and the lack of an intact LOS molecule has been shown to adversely affect both the ability ofH. ducreyi to attach to and invade human keratinocytes in vitro (21) and the ability of this organism to cause skin lesions in an animal model (6).

In the present study, an H. ducreyi gene encoding a protein with significant identity to the Salmonella typhimurium RfaF (WaaF) (57, 65) protein was shown to be essential for expression of wild-type LOS by H. ducreyi 35000 and was shown to complement an S. typhimurium rfaF (waaF) mutant. Lack of expression of this WaaF homolog caused H. ducreyi to synthesize a truncated LOS molecule and to become attenuated in an animal model for experimental chancroid. (In accordance with a recent recommendation [57], the gene designation waaF will be used in place of rfaF in this report from this point forward.)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and culture conditions.The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table1. Escherichia coli andS. typhimurium strains were grown in Luria-Bertani medium (59) supplemented, when appropriate, with tetracycline, chloramphenicol, or kanamycin at a final concentration of 15, 30, or 30 μg/ml, respectively. H. ducreyi strains were grown on chocolate agar (CA) plates containing 1% (vol/vol) IsoVitaleX (BBL Microbiological Systems, Cockeysville, Md.) as previously described (55). CA plates were supplemented either with chloramphenicol (2 μg/ml) for mutant selection or with both chloramphenicol (2 μg/ml) and kanamycin (30 μg/ml) for complementation experiments. A modified Haemophilus somnusliquid medium (31) was used in growth studies; it consisted of filter-sterilized Columbia broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) supplemented with 2.5% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum, 0.1% (wt/vol) Trizma base (Sigma Chemical Co. St. Louis, Mo.), 1% (vol/vol) IsoVitaleX, and heme (final concentration, 25 μg/ml). In these growth studies, H. ducreyi strains were grown at 33°C with slow shaking (90 rpm) in a water bath; growth was monitored by measurement of culture turbidity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

PCR and recombinant DNA techniques.PCR systems, employed to confirm the identities of certain mutant constructs and to produce double-stranded DNA probes, utilized Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, Wis.); these reactions were performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (71). A Gene Amp XL PCR kit (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) was used to identify mutated plasmids containing the Ω-chloramphenicol (Ω-Cm) cartridge. The Pfu DNA polymerase system (Stratagene) was employed to amplify DNA that was used to construct plasmids containing the wild-type H. ducreyi waaF gene. Boiled bacterial cell preparations (27) or chromosomal DNA purified from H. ducreyi was used as the template for PCR. Standard techniques such as restriction enzyme digestions, ligation reactions, transformations, electroporation of E. colistrains, and plasmid purifications have been previously described (5, 59).

H. ducreyi genomic libraries.Two differentH. ducreyi 35000 genomic libraries were used in this study. The first was constructed in pUC19 (69) and yielded the recombinant plasmid pHD1.3. The other consisted of a partialPstI digest of H. ducreyi 35000 chromosomal DNA that was ligated into the PstI site of pBR322 (59) and used to transform E. coli RR1. The recombinant plasmid pSLR1 was derived from the latter library.

Nucleotide sequence analysis.A model 373A automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) was used to perform nucleotide sequence analysis. DNA sequence information was analyzed through the National Center for Biotechnology Information, using the BLAST network service to search the GenBank database (4), and with MacVector sequence analysis software (version 6; Oxford Molecular Group, Campbell, Calif.).

Construction of the isogenic H. ducreyi waaFmutant.The Ω-Cm cartridge was excised from pHP45Ω-Cm (17) by digestion with BamHI, isolated by agarose gel electrophoresis, made blunt ended by treatment with the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I (New England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.) and deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and blunt-end ligated into theMscI site within the waaF open reading frame (ORF) of pSLR1 (Fig. 1) to obtain pBB10. After propagation in E. coli HB101, plasmid pBB10 was purified by using a Wizard Plus Minipreps DNA purification system (Promega), linearized by digestion with PvuI, and used to electroporate H. ducreyi 35000 (24). The desired transformants were selected on CA plates supplemented with chloramphenicol.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Partial restriction map of the H. ducreyi35000 chromosomal DNA insert in pSLR1 and related plasmids. The eight ORFs present in this insert are indicated together in boxes, with open arrows designating the proposed directions of transcription. Restriction sites in parentheses indicate vector cloning sites. The closed arrows indicate various oligonucleotide primers used in PCR. The cross-hatched bar beneath the waaF gene indicates the 328-bp probe used for Southern blot analysis (see Fig. 4). The Ω-Cm cartridge was ligated into the MscI site of pSLR1 to construct pBB10. Plasmid pBB12 is pCR2.1 with a 1.5-kb PCR product containing the waaF gene and flanking DNA; the small boxes on the ends of this insert represent nucleotides involved in cloning it into the pCR2.1 vector. Plasmid pBB13 is pLS88 with the aforementioned 1.5-kb PCR product cloned into the EcoRI and SacI sites of this vector.

Complementation of an S. typhimurium waaF mutant with the H. ducreyi waaF gene.A 1.5-kb PCR product containing the wild-type H. ducreyi waaF gene was prepared by using 600 ng of H. ducreyi 35000 chromosomal DNA template together with the oligonucleotide primers P1 (5′-CGGAATTCATCTCGCATTCAGCACTCCC-3′) and P2 (5′-CCGAGCTCCAAGTATCAAAGATTTCCCTGC-3′) (Fig. 1) (the underlined sequences indicate EcoRI and SacI sites, respectively). This 1.5-kb fragment was ligated into the pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) and used to transform E. coli DH5α. A plasmid (pBB12) from one of these transformants was used to electroporate the waaF mutant strain S. typhimurium 3789 (58); the desired recombinant strain was selected with ampicillin.

Complementation of the H. ducreyi waaF mutant.After digestion with both EcoRI and SacI, the 1.5-kb PCR product described above was ligated into pLS88 (15) and used to transform E. coli DH5α; transformants were selected with kanamycin. A plasmid (pBB13) from one of these transformants was used to electroporate the waaFmutant H. ducreyi 35000.10. Selection of the complementedH. ducreyi mutants was accomplished by using CA containing both kanamycin and chloramphenicol.

MAb and colony blot radioimmunoassay.Monoclonal antibody (MAb) 3E6 is specific for a surface-exposed epitope of H. ducreyi 35000 LOS (25). Hybridoma culture supernatant containing this MAb was used as the source of the primary antibody in the colony blot radioimmunoassay (34, 52).

Southern blot analysis. AflIII or both ClaI and SpeI were used to digest purified H. ducreyichromosomal DNA. Southern blot analysis was performed as previously described (59), using two different DNA probes. A 328-bp probe internal to the H. ducreyi waaF gene was constructed by PCR with the oligonucleotide primers P3 (5′-AGATTTTGATTATAGGACCC-3′) and P4 (5′-CTTTCACCTTTCCAACCG-3′) (Fig. 1). The 3.8 kb Ω-Cm cartridge was also used as a probe in Southern blot analyses. These probes were radiolabeled with [32P]dCTP by using a Random Primed DNA Labeling Kit (Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind.).

Analysis of S. typhimurium LPS and H. ducreyi LOS.Proteinase K was used to treat whole-cell lysates of S. typhimurium and H. ducreyi strains (52); then Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (40) was performed to resolve the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or LOS in these preparations. Silver staining (77) and Western blot analysis with MAb 3E6 (6) were accomplished as described elsewhere.

Analysis of outer membrane proteins.Proteins present in the Sarkosyl-insoluble fraction from H. ducreyi cell envelopes (19, 36) were resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue.

Virulence testing.The relative virulence of the H. ducreyi strains used in this study was assessed in the temperature-dependent rabbit model for experimental chancroid (55). These animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee of the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Eight New Zealand White adult male rabbits were used in each experiment, and they were housed at a room temperature between 15 and 17°C. All other housing procedures and animal care procedures were performed in accordance with the standards of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International. H. ducreyi cells were serially diluted and injected intradermally into each animal. Each rabbit was injected with at most three strains and with one injection of each dilution of the inoculum. To prevent bias in scoring of the lesions, the inocula were encoded by a second party prior to injection. Strain codes were broken after the conclusion of the experiment. Scoring of lesions on days 2, 4, and 7 postinjection involved the following numeric values: 0 = no change, 1 = erythema, 2 = induration, 3 = nodule, and 4 = pustule or necrosis (55). In addition, lesions were photographed on days 4 and 7 postinjection, and material excised from lesions caused by injection of 105 CFU of H. ducreyi was cultured on CA plates on day 7 postinjection. Organisms recovered on CA medium were then subcultured onto CA supplemented with appropriate antimicrobial compounds to confirm the presence of the relevant antimicrobial resistance markers and were also tested by colony blot radioimmunoassay with MAb 3E6 to confirm the LOS phenotype. Statistical analyses were performed as described previously (68, 69).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.The nucleotide sequence of the 5.8-kb DNA fragment containing the H. ducreyi waaF gene was deposited in GenBank and assigned accession no.AF087414.

RESULTS

Identification of the waaF gene of H. ducreyi 35000.Partial nucleotide sequence analysis of a recombinant clone [E. coli DH5α(pHD1.3)], derived from an H. ducreyi 35000 genomic library constructed in the plasmid vector pUC19, revealed the presence of an incomplete ORF encoding a predicted, truncated protein with homology to the WaaF protein of S. typhimurium (65). The 1.5-kbH. ducreyi DNA insert in pHD1.3 contained a putative translational start codon for this ORF but lacked a termination codon. To obtain the complete ORF, a double-stranded probe was constructed by PCR, using oligonucleotide primers P4 (see Materials and Methods) and P5 (5′-TTGCCATAATATAGCCCG-3′), with H. ducreyi 35000 chromosomal DNA as the template. The use of this probe to screen an H. ducreyi genomic library constructed in pBR322 resulted in the identification of the recombinant plasmid pSLR1, which contained a 5.8-kb H. ducreyi 35000 DNA insert (Fig.1).

Nucleotide sequence analysis of the middle of this 5.8-kb DNA fragment revealed a complete ORF, 1,048 nucleotides in length, which encoded a predicted protein with a calculated molecular mass of 39,153 Da. This protein had 59% identity with the ADP-heptose:LPS heptosyltransferase II (WaaF) of S. typhimurium (65) and 70% identity with the WaaF protein of H. influenzae (Fig.2) (20, 44). The WaaF protein from N. gonorrhoeae (63) was only 43% identical to the H. ducreyi WaaF molecule (Fig. 2). Two complete ORFs encoding predicted proteins with homology to the OapA and OapB proteins of H. influenzae (80) were located immediately upstream from this waaF homolog (Fig. 1). Two small ORFs encoding predicted proteins with similarity to a hypothetical protein (HI1008) and a phosphatidylserine decarboxylase fromH. influenzae (20) were located on the opposite strand (Fig. 1). Two ORFs encoding predicted proteins with homology to the S12 (70) and S7 ribosomal proteins and an incomplete ORF encoding a predicted protein with homology to elongation factor G (20) were located downstream. These other ORFs were not analyzed further in this study.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of the WaaF proteins from H. influenzae (20, 44),H. ducreyi 35000, S. typhimurium (65), and N. gonorrhoeae (53, 63) by using the Clustal-W alignment program in MacVector version 6. Dark shading indicates residues that are identical; light shading indicates residues that are similar.

Complementation of an S. typhimurium waaF mutant with the H. ducreyi waaF gene homolog.Complementation analysis was used to determine whether the similarity between the WaaF protein of S. typhimurium and the H. ducreyi WaaF homolog would allow the latter to function in this enteric organism. The H. ducreyi waaF gene was amplified by PCR and cloned into pCR2.1 to obtain pBB12 (Fig. 1). waaF mutant strainS. typhimurium 3789 (58) was electroporated with this recombinant plasmid, and one of the resultant transformants [strain 3789(pBB12)] was selected for further study.

Tricine-SDS-PAGE was used to analyze LPS molecules present in proteinase K-treated whole-cell lysates of the relevant S. typhimurium strains (Fig. 3). The LPS of the wild-type strain S. typhimurium 3770 (Fig. 3, lane 1) formed the ladder-like pattern indicative of the presence of the O antigen repeat unit, whereas the LPS of the S. typhimurium waaF mutant appeared as a single, very-fast-migrating band (Fig.3, lane 2). The migration rate of the LPS of this mutant was not affected by the presence of the plasmid vector (Fig. 3, lane 3). However, when the wild-type H. ducreyi waaF was present intrans in strain 3789 (Fig. 3, lane 4), this S. typhimurium mutant synthesized an LPS which migrated in a pattern similar, if not identical, to that obtained with the LPS of the wild-type strain.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

SDS-PAGE analysis of LPS expressed by the S. typhimurium waaF mutant strain 3789 and related S. typhimurium strains. LPS present in proteinase K-treated whole-cell lysates was resolved by Tricine-SDS-PAGE and stained with silver. Lanes: 1, S. typhimurium 3770, with a wild-typewaaF gene; 2, S. typhimurium 3789; 3, S. typhimurium 3789 containing the pCR2.1 vector; 4, S. typhimurium 3789 containing pBB12 with the wild-type H. ducreyi waaF gene.

Construction of an isogenic H. ducreyi waaFmutant.Plasmid pBB10 (Fig. 1), containing the Ω-Cm cartridge inserted within the MscI site in the middle of the H. ducreyi waaF ORF, was linearized with PvuI and used to electroporate H. ducreyi 35000. Thirty-four chloramphenicol-resistant H. ducreyi transformants were tested initially in the colony blot radioimmunoassay for reactivity with the H. ducreyi LOS-specific MAb 3E6. Nine of these proved to lack reactivity with this MAb (data not shown); one of these nine (isolate 35000.10) was selected at random for further study.

Southern blot analysis was performed to confirm that strain 35000.10 was an isogenic waaF mutant. When chromosomal DNA from the wild-type parent strain 35000 was probed with the 328-bp fragment from the H. ducreyi waaF gene (Fig. 1), a 3.9-kbSpeI-ClaI fragment was found to hybridize with this probe (Fig. 4, lane 1). This same probe hybridized with a 7.8-kb SpeI-ClaI fragment of chromosomal DNA from strain 35000.10 (Fig. 4, lane 2). This result was consistent with the replacement of the wild-type waaFgene with the mutated allele containing the 3.8-kb Ω-Cm cartridge. When the Ω-Cm cartridge was used as the probe, a 7.8-kbSpeI-ClaI fragment from strain 35000.10 also was found to hybridize (Fig. 4, lane 6). Chromosomal DNA from the wild-type parent strain 35000 failed to hybridize with the Ω-Cm probe (Fig. 4, lane 5).

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Southern blot analysis of chromosomal DNA preparations from H. ducreyi wild-type, mutant, and complemented mutant strains. Chromosomal DNAs were digested with both SpeI andClaI, resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis, and probed with either a 328-bp PCR product derived from the H. ducreyi waaF gene (lanes 1 to 4) or the Ω-Cm cartridge (lanes 5 to 8). Lanes: 1 and 5, strain 35000; 2 and 6, waaF mutant 35000.10; 3 and 7, 35000.10(pLS88); 4 and 8, 35000.10(pBB13). The positions of molecular size markers (in kilobases) are indicated on the left side of the figure.

Characterization of the isogenic waaF mutant.The wild-type strain 35000 and the waaF mutant strain 35000.10 grew at the same rate and to the same final density in broth (data not shown). Analysis of the outer membrane protein profiles of these two strains revealed that the waaF mutant (Fig.5, lane 3) did not appear to lack any proteins expressed by the wild-type parent strain (Fig. 5, lane 1), although these two strains did differ in the relative abundances of some of their outer membrane proteins (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Comparison of outer membrane proteins from H. ducreyi wild-type, mutant, and complemented mutant strains. Proteins present in the Sarkosyl-insoluble cell envelope fraction were resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue. Lanes: 1, wild-type strain 35000; 2, strain 35000(pLS88); 3, waaFmutant strain 35000.10; 4, strain 35000.10(pLS88); 5, strain 35000.10(pBB13). The two arrows indicate outer membrane proteins whose relative abundances were different for the wild-type strain 35000 and the mutant strain 35000.10. The positions of molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are shown on the left side of this figure.

In SDS-PAGE, the LOS of the waaF mutant 35000.10 migrated at a rate different from those of the LOSs of the wild type and other previously described H. ducreyi LOS mutants. The LOS of the wild-type strain 35000 (Fig. 6A, lane 1) and that of the isogenic gmhA mutant 35000.252 (6) (lane 3) migrated at the slowest and fastest rates, respectively. The LOS of the waaF mutant 35000.10 (Fig. 6A, lane 4) migrated more rapidly than the LOS of the rfaK(lbgB) mutant 35000.7 (68) (Fig. 6A, lane 2) but more slowly than that of the gmhA mutant. In Western blot analysis with MAb 3E6, as previously shown, the wild-type strain 35000 (Fig. 6B, lane 1) bound this antibody (68). In contrast, all three of the LOS mutants failed to bind this MAb (Fig. 6B, lanes 2 to 4).

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Characterization of the LOSs expressed by wild-type, mutant, and complemented mutant strains of H. ducreyi. LOSs present in proteinase K-treated whole-cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and either stained with silver (A) or transferred to nitrocellulose for Western blot analysis with the H. ducreyiLOS-specific MAb 3E6 (B). Lanes: 1, wild-type strain 35000; 2,rfaK (lbgB) mutant 35000.7; 3, gmhAmutant 35000.252; 4, waaF mutant 35000.10; 5, strain 35000.10(pLS88); 6, strain 35000.10(pBB13).

Complementation of the H. ducreyi waaF mutant.The pLS88 vector and the recombinant plasmid pBB13, constructed by inserting the wild-type H. ducreyi waaF gene into pLS88 (Fig. 1), were used to electroporate the waaF mutant strainH. ducreyi 35000.10. Southern blot analysis of thewaaF mutant containing only the pLS88 vector (Fig. 4, lanes 3 and 7) yielded a hybridization pattern identical to that of the mutant alone. In contrast, when the waaF mutant containing pBB13 was probed with the waaF-specific DNA fragment, twoSpeI-ClaI fragments hybridized with this probe (Fig. 4, lane 4). The 7.8-kb fragment represented the mutatedwaaF gene in the chromosome, whereas the 6.5-kb fragment corresponded to the expected size of the linearized form of pBB13 (which contained a single ClaI site and no SpeI sites). As expected, only the 7.8-kb SpeI-ClaI fragment (containing the mutated waaF gene) from strain 35000.10(pBB13) bound to the Ω-Cm probe (Fig. 4, lane 8).

Successful complementation of the waaF mutant was confirmed by analysis of its LOS phenotype. The wild-type H. ducreyi waaF gene in trans in the waaF mutant [i.e., strain 35000.10(pBB13)] (Fig. 6, lanes 6) resulted in expression of a LOS molecule which had a migration rate and MAb 3E6 reactivity indistinguishable from those of wild-type LOS (Fig. 6, lanes 1). The migration rate and MAb 3E6 reactivity of the LOS of theH. ducreyi waaF mutant containing only the pLS88 vector [i.e., strain 35000.10(pLS88)] (Fig. 6, lanes 5) were not distinguishable from those of the waaF mutant 35000.10 (Fig.6, lanes 4). Complementation of this mutant with the H. ducreyi waaF gene (Fig. 5, lane 5) also resulted in expression of an outer membrane protein profile similar, if not identical, to those of the wild-type parent strain (Fig. 5, lane 1) and the wild-type strain containing only the vector (Fig. 5, lane 2). The presence of the vector alone in the waaF mutant (Fig. 5, lane 4) did not affect the outer membrane profile of this strain relative to that of the mutant (Fig. 5, lane 3).

Effect of the waaF mutation on virulence expression.The temperature-dependent rabbit model (55) was used to evaluate the virulence of the isogenic waaFmutant 35000.10. In the first experiment, which involved eight rabbits (Table 2, experiment A), by day 2 postinfection, five of eight rabbit lesions resulting from inoculation of 105 CFU of the wild-type strain had formed pustules and one lesion demonstrated necrosis; all six of these lesions were assigned a lesion score of 4. The two remaining lesions were nodular and received a lesion score of 3. By day 7 postinfection, seven of eight rabbit lesions that resulted from the inoculation of 105 CFU of the wild-type strain had progressed and necrosis with eschar formation was evident (lesion score = 4), whereas the eighth lesion was still at the nodular stage (lesion score = 3). In contrast, on day 2 postinfection, all eight lesions that resulted from inoculation of 105 CFU of the waaF mutant had only formed nodules, and seven of these lesions remained at this nodular stage on day 7 postinfection. Similar individual rabbit lesion scores were obtained in a second, independent experiment that also utilized eight animals (Table 2, experiment B). In these two experiments, mean lesion scores obtained with the wild-type strain 35000 were significantly higher than those obtained with thewaaF mutant (Table 2). Finally, when lesions were sampled on day 7 postinfection, viable H. ducreyi 35000 organisms were recovered from 14 of 16 lesions produced by this wild-type strain; in contrast, viable H. ducreyi 35000.10 organisms were not recovered from any of 16 lesions produced by this waaFmutant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Lesion formation by wild-type, waaF mutant, and complemented waaF mutant strains of H. ducreyi in the temperature-dependent rabbit modela

As part of the second experiment (Table 2, experiment B), complementation analysis was performed to determine whether the presence of the wild-type H. ducreyi waaF gene intrans would restore the virulence of the waaFmutant. The complemented waaF mutant, 35000.10(pBB13), produced lesions that were not significantly different from those obtained with the wild-type parent strain (Table 2, experiment B). In addition, viable H. ducreyi organisms were recovered from seven of eight lesions produced by the complemented waaFmutant 35000.10 (pBB13). Colony blot analysis with MAb 3E6 and antimicrobial resistance testing were used to confirm the identity of the H. ducreyi organisms recovered from lesions produced by strain 35000.10(pBB13).

Detection of the waaF gene among H. ducreyistrains.The 328-bp fragment from the waaF gene ofH. ducreyi 35000 (Fig. 1) was used to probe chromosomal DNA from 11 strains of H. ducreyi (35000, Hd9, Hd12, Hd13, 512, 1145, 1151, 1352, Cha-1, R018, and STD101) (68). All of these strains possessed a 3.3-kb AflIII fragment of chromosomal DNA which hybridized to this probe, suggesting the presence of the waaF gene in all 11 strains (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

The potential involvement of H. ducreyi LOS in the expression of virulence by this pathogen was first amply illustrated by demonstration of the potent inflammatory ability of this amphipathic molecule in animal model systems (11, 78). Elucidation of the basic structure of H. ducreyi LOS has revealed that this outer membrane antigen is remarkably similar to the LOS of H. influenzae (1, 21, 42, 43, 64). However, in contrast to the recent accumulation of important information concerning the genetics of H. influenzae LOS expression (30, 32, 44,45, 54, 81), there is still relatively little known about the gene products involved in the synthesis of H. ducreyi LOS.

Only recently has mutant analysis been used to begin investigation of the involvement of H. ducreyi LOS in virulence expression. Initial efforts in this area resulted in the construction ofrfaK (lbgB) mutants of H. ducreyi, which expressed an LOS with a modestly truncated oligosaccharide (9, 21, 68). Interestingly, these H. ducreyi LOS mutants were less able to both attach to and invade human keratinocytes in vitro (9, 21). Testing of the virulence potential of anrfaK (lbgB) mutant in the temperature-dependent rabbit model yielded equivocal results in that this mutation did not exert a statistically significant effect on the ability of H. ducreyi to produce skin lesions in this animal model (68). However, a gmhA mutant of H. ducreyi, which expressed a drastically truncated LOS that likely consisted of lipid A together with a single molecule of 2-keto-3-deoxyoctulosonic acid (KDO) (26), was shown to be markedly less virulent than its wild-type parent strain in this same animal model (6). This result suggests that certain truncations of the H. ducreyi LOS oligosaccharide chain can affect the virulence potential of this pathogen in an animal model system.

First characterized in enteric organisms (62, 65), the gene (waaF) encoding heptosyltransferase II has now been identified in a number of bacterial pathogens and subsequently characterized (3, 14, 33, 44, 53, 63). At least in H. influenzae (44), and likely also in H. ducreyi, the protein product of the waaF gene is involved in catalyzing the addition of a (second) heptose molecule onto the heptose linked directly to KDO. The absence of WaaF activity inH. ducreyi would be predicted to result in the synthesis of a truncated lipid A-KDO-heptose moiety instead of a complete LOS molecule. Evidence of the involvement of the waaF gene product in a process likely to be relevant to virulence expression has been obtained previously for N. gonorrhoeae, for which awaaF mutation resulted in a markedly reduced ability to adhere to and invade Chang conjunctival epithelial cells in vitro (63), although this same mutation in Neisseria meningitidis did not alter the toxicity of whole cells of this encapsulated pathogen for human umbilical vein endothelial cells in culture (33). In addition, a waaF mutant ofH. influenzae type b was shown to have a greatly reduced ability to cause bacteremia in infant rats following intraperitoneal injection (30).

The H. ducreyi waaF mutant expressed a LOS that migrated much more rapidly in SDS-PAGE than the LOS of the wild-type parent strain and just slightly more slowly than the drastically truncated LOS expressed by the H. ducreyi gmhA mutant (Fig. 6) (6). When present in trans, the wild-typeH. ducreyi waaF gene allowed an S. typhimurium waaF mutant to express an LPS molecule which appeared to be identical to that expressed by the wild-type S. typhimuriumstrain (Fig. 3). The latter result confirmed the identity of thisH. ducreyi protein as a functional WaaF homolog.

Similar to the previously described H. ducreyi gmhA mutant, the H. ducreyi waaF mutant exhibited some changes in the relative abundance of a few outer membrane proteins (Fig. 5). These changes appeared to involve the same proteins as were affected in theH. ducreyi gmhA mutant (6), suggesting that the observed alteration in outer membrane protein abundance is likely a response to the presence of a truncated LOS molecule in the outer membrane rather than a specific response to the waaFmutation. Interestingly, a waaF mutant of N. meningitidis was reported to be invariant from its wild-type parent strain with regard to expression of major surface antigens (33). Complementation of the H. ducreyi waaFmutant with the wild-type H. ducreyi waaF gene did result in restoration of expression of an apparent wild-type outer membrane protein profile (Fig. 5). Changes in outer membrane protein expression have also been described for deep, rough LPS mutants of enteric bacteria (18, 37, 46). Whether the described changes in the relative abundance of a few outer membrane proteins of the H. ducreyi waaF mutant could have affected virulence expression cannot be determined directly from the available data.

It is also interesting that the H. ducreyi waaF gene, similar to the rfaK (lbgB) (21, 68) and gmhA genes of this pathogen, is not located amid a cluster of other genes whose products are likely involved in LOS biosynthesis. Instead, the H. ducreyi waaF gene is located immediately upstream from a gene involved in the synthesis of a ribosomal protein and immediately downstream from two genes encoding proteins with homology to the H. influenzae OapA and OapB proteins (Fig. 1) (80). The H. influenzae OapA protein recently has been shown to be involved in the ability ofH. influenzae to colonize the nasopharynx of the infant rat (80). This placement of the H. ducreyi waaF gene is in contrast to the multiple, closely linked genes involved in enteric core LPS biosynthesis (i.e., the E. coli rfa[waa] genes) (35, 62). Even in most strains ofH. influenzae (44), the waaF gene is located immediately downstream from rfaD (waaD), as in enteric bacteria (62, 65). Why all of the H. ducreyi LOS biosynthetic genes described to date are located in discrete sites in the H. ducreyi genome remains to be determined.

Whereas lack of expression of WaaF did not have an apparent effect on the ability of H. ducreyi to grow in vitro in broth medium, the waaF mutation had a pronounced effect on H. ducreyi in vivo. More specifically, the H. ducreyi waaFmutant was less virulent than its wild-type parent strain in the temperature-dependent rabbit model (Table 2) and could not be recovered from lesions at 7 days postinfection. Restoration of both wild-type LOS expression and virulence was accomplished by provision of the wild-typeH. ducreyi waaF gene in trans, a result which also indicated that the H. ducreyi waaF mutant did not possess a secondary mutation(s) which could have affected LOS expression or virulence. Whether the waaF mutation will alter the virulence of H. ducreyi for humans will eventually have to be determined in the human challenge model for experimental chancroid (66, 67).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by U.S. Public Health Service grant AI-32011 to E.J.H. B.A.B. was supported by U.S. Public Health Service training grant RR-07031.

S. typhimurium 3770 and 3789 were provided by Kenneth Sanderson, and the Ω-Cm cartridge was obtained from Joachim Frey. We thank Christine Ward and David Lewis for careful assistance with the animal model and both Robert Munson and Anthony Campagnari for helpful discussions.

Notes

Editor: E. I. Tuomanen

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 23 September 1998.
    • Returned for modification 26 October 1998.
    • Accepted 24 November 1998.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Ahmed H. J.,
    2. Frisk A.,
    3. Månsson J.-E.,
    4. Schweda E. K. H.,
    5. Lagergård T.
    (1997) Structurally defined epitopes of Haemophilus ducreyi lipooligosaccharides recognized by monoclonal antibodies. Infect. Immun. 65:3151–3158.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Alfa M. J.,
    2. DeGagne P.,
    3. Totten P. A.
    (1996) Haemophilus ducreyi hemolysin acts as a contact cytotoxin and damages human foreskin fibroblasts in cell culture. Infect. Immun. 64:2349–2352.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Allen A. G.,
    2. Isobe T.,
    3. Maskell D. J.
    (1998) Identification and cloning of waaF (rfaF) from Bordetella pertussis and use to generate mutants of Bordetella spp. with deep rough lipopolysaccharide. J. Bacteriol. 180:35–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Altschul S. F.,
    2. Gish W.,
    3. Miller W.,
    4. Myers E. W.,
    5. Lipman D. J.
    (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403–410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. ↵
    1. Ausubel F. M.,
    2. Brent R.,
    3. Kingston R. E.,
    4. Moore D. D.,
    5. Smith J. A.,
    6. Seidman J. G.,
    7. Struhl K.
    (1990) Current protocols in molecular biology. (Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York, N.Y).
  6. ↵
    1. Bauer B. A.,
    2. Stevens M. K.,
    3. Hansen E. J.
    (1998) Involvement of the Haemophilus ducreyi gmhA gene product in lipooligosaccharide expression and virulence. Infect. Immun. 66:4290–4298.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Brentjens R. J.,
    2. Ketterer M.,
    3. Apicella M. A.,
    4. Spinola S. M.
    (1996) Fine tangled pili expressed by Haemophilus ducreyi are a novel class of pili. J. Bacteriol. 178:808–816.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Brentjens R. J.,
    2. Spinola S. M.,
    3. Campagnari A. A.
    (1994) Haemophilus ducreyi adheres to human keratinocytes. Microb. Pathog. 16:243–247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Campagnari A. A.,
    2. Karalus R.,
    3. Apicella M.,
    4. Melaugh W.,
    5. Lesse A. J.,
    6. Gibson B. W.
    (1994) Use of pyocin to select a Haemophilus ducreyi variant defective in lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis. Infect. Immun. 62:2379–2386.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Campagnari A. A.,
    2. Spinola S. M.,
    3. Lesse A. J.,
    4. Kwaik Y. A.,
    5. Mandrell R. E.,
    6. Apicella M. A.
    (1990) Lipooligosaccharide epitopes shared among gram-negative non-enteric mucosal pathogens. Microb. Pathog. 8:353–362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. ↵
    1. Campagnari A. A.,
    2. Wild L. M.,
    3. Griffiths G. E.,
    4. Karalus R. J.,
    5. Wirth M. A.,
    6. Spinola S. M.
    (1991) Role of lipooligosaccharides in experimental dermal lesions caused by Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 59:2601–2608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Carson S. D. B.,
    2. Thomas C. E.,
    3. Elkins C.
    (1996) Cloning and sequencing of a Haemophilus ducreyi fur homolog. Gene 176:125–129.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Cope L. D.,
    2. Lumbley S. R.,
    3. Latimer J. L.,
    4. Klesney-Tait J.,
    5. Stevens M. K.,
    6. Johnson L. S.,
    7. Purven M.,
    8. Munson R. S. Jr.,
    9. Lagergård T.,
    10. Radolf J. D.,
    11. Hansen E. J.
    (1997) A diffusible cytotoxin of Haemophilus ducreyi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4056–4061.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. de Kievit T. R.,
    2. Lam J. S.
    (1997) Isolation and characterization of two genes, waaC (rfaC) and waaF (rfaF), involved in Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype O5 inner-core biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 179:3451–3457.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Dixon L. G.,
    2. Albritton W. L.,
    3. Willson P. J.
    (1994) An analysis of the complete nucleotide sequence of the Haemophilus ducreyi broad-host-range plasmid pLS88. Plasmid 32:228–232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Elkins C.,
    2. Chen C.-J.,
    3. Thomas C. E.
    (1995) Characterization of the hgbA locus encoding a hemoglobin receptor from Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 63:2194–2200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Fellay R.,
    2. Frey J.,
    3. Krisch H. M.
    (1987) Interposon mutagenesis of soil and water bacteria: a family of DNA fragments designed for in vitro insertional mutagenesis of gram negative bacteria. Gene 52:147–152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. Ferro-Luzzi Ames G.,
    2. Spudich E. N.,
    3. Nikaido H.
    (1974) Protein composition of the outer membrane of Salmonella typhimurium: effect of lipopolysaccharide mutations. J. Bacteriol. 117:406–416.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Filip C.,
    2. Fletcher G.,
    3. Wulff J. L.,
    4. Earhart C. F.
    (1973) Solubilization of the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli by the ionic detergent sodium-lauryl sarcosinate. J. Bacteriol. 115:717–722.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Fleischmann R. D.,
    2. Adams M. D.,
    3. White O.,
    4. Clayton R. A.,
    5. Kirkness E. F.,
    6. Kerlavage A. R.,
    7. Bult C. J.,
    8. Tomb J.-F.,
    9. Dougherty B. A.,
    10. Merrick J. M.,
    11. McKenney K.,
    12. Sutton G.,
    13. FitzHugh W.,
    14. Fields C.,
    15. Gocayne J. D.,
    16. Scott J.,
    17. Shirley R.,
    18. Liu L.-I.,
    19. Glodek A.,
    20. Kelley J. M.,
    21. Weidman J. F.,
    22. Phillips C. A.,
    23. Spriggs T.,
    24. Hedblom E.,
    25. Cotton M. D.,
    26. Utterback R. C.,
    27. Hanna M. C.,
    28. Nguyen D. T.,
    29. Saudek D. M.,
    30. Brandon R. C.,
    31. Fine L. D.,
    32. Frichman J. L.,
    33. Fuhrmann J. L.,
    34. Geoghagen N. S. M.,
    35. Gnehm C. L.,
    36. McDonald L. A.,
    37. Small K. V.,
    38. Fraser C. M.,
    39. Smith H. O.,
    40. Venter J. C.
    (1995) Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269:496–512.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Gibson B. W.,
    2. Campagnari A. A.,
    3. Melaugh W.,
    4. Phillips N. J.,
    5. Apicella M. A.,
    6. Grass S.,
    7. Wang J.,
    8. Palmer K. L.,
    9. Munson R. S. Jr.
    (1997) Characterization of a transposon Tn916-generated mutant of Haemophilus ducreyi 35000 defective in lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 179:5062–5071.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Gibson B. W.,
    2. Melaugh W.,
    3. Phillips N. J.,
    4. Apicella M. A.,
    5. Campagnari A. A.,
    6. Griffiss J. M.
    (1993) Investigation of the structural heterogeneity of lipooligosaccharides from pathogenic Haemophilus and Neisseria species and of R-type lipopolysaccharides from Salmonella typhimurium by electrospray mass spectrometry. J. Bacteriol. 175:2702–2712.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hammond G. W.,
    2. Lian C. J.,
    3. Wilt J. C.,
    4. Ronald A. R.
    (1978) Antimicrobial susceptibility of Haemophilus ducreyi. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13:608–612.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Hansen E. J.,
    2. Latimer J. L.,
    3. Thomas S. E.,
    4. Helminen M.,
    5. Albritton W. L.,
    6. Radolf J. D.
    (1992) Use of electroporation to construct isogenic mutants of Haemophilus ducreyi. J. Bacteriol. 174:5442–5449.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Hansen E. J.,
    2. Lumbley S. R.,
    3. Saxen H.,
    4. Kern K.,
    5. Cope L. D.,
    6. Radolf J. D.
    (1995) Detection of Haemophilus ducreyi lipooligosaccharide by means of an immunolimulus assay. J. Immunol. Methods 185:225–235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Helander I. M.,
    2. Lindner B.,
    3. Brade H.,
    4. Altmann K.,
    5. Lindberg A. A.,
    6. Rietschel E. T.,
    7. Zahringer U.
    (1988) Chemical structure of the lipopolysaccharide of Haemophilus ducreyi strain I-69 Rd−/b+: description of a novel deep-rough chemotype. Eur. J. Biochem. 177:483–492.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Hennessy K. J.,
    2. Iandolo J. J.,
    3. Fenwick B. W.
    (1993) Serotype identification of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae by arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:1155–1159.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Hobbs M. M.,
    2. Paul T. R.,
    3. Wyrick P. B.,
    4. Kawula T. H.
    (1998) Haemophilus ducreyi infection causes basal keratinocyte cytotoxicity and elicits a unique cytokine induction pattern in an in vitro human skin model. Infect. Immun. 66:2914–2921.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Hobbs M. M.,
    2. San Mateo L. R.,
    3. Orndorff P. E.,
    4. Almond G.,
    5. Kawula T. H.
    (1995) Swine model of Haemophilus ducreyi infection. Infect. Immun. 63:3094–3100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Hood D. W.,
    2. Deadman M. E.,
    3. Allen T.,
    4. Masoud H.,
    5. Martin A.,
    6. Brisson J. R.,
    7. Fleischmann R.,
    8. Venter J. C.,
    9. Richards J. C.,
    10. Moxon E. R.
    (1996) Use of the complete genome sequence information of Haemophilus influenzae strain Rd to investigate lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. Mol. Microbiol. 22:951–965.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. ↵
    1. Inzana T. J.,
    2. Corbeil L. B.
    (1987) Development of a defined medium for Haemophilus somnus isolated from cattle. Am. J. Vet. Res. 48:366–369.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Jackson A. D.,
    2. Maskell D.,
    3. Moxon E. R.,
    4. Wilson R.
    (1996) The effect of mutations in genes required for lipopolysaccharide synthesis on Haemophilus influenzae type b colonization of human nasopharyngeal tissue. Microb. Pathog. 21:463–470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Jennings M. P.,
    2. Bisercic M.,
    3. Dunn K. L. R.,
    4. Virji M.,
    5. Martin A.,
    6. Wilks K. E.,
    7. Richards J. C.,
    8. Moxon E. R.
    (1995) Cloning and molecular analysis of the lsi1 (rfaF) gene of Neisseria meningitidis which encodes a heptosyl-2-transferase involved in LPS mediated toxicity for human endothelial cells. Microb. Pathog. 19:391–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Kimura A.,
    2. Hansen E. J.
    (1986) Antigenic and phenotypic variations of Haemophilus influenzae type b lipopolysaccharide and their relationship to virulence. Infect. Immun. 51:69–79.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Klena J. D.,
    2. Pradel E.,
    3. Schnaitman C. A.
    (1992) Comparison of lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis genes rfaK, rfaL, rfaY, and rfaZ of Escherichia coli K-12 and Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 174:4746–4752.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Klesney-Tait J.,
    2. Hiltke T. J.,
    3. Maciver I.,
    4. Spinola S. M.,
    5. Radolf J. D.,
    6. Hansen E. J.
    (1997) The major outer membrane protein of Haemophilus ducreyi consists of two OmpA homologs. J. Bacteriol. 179:1764–1773.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Koplow J.,
    2. Goldfine H.
    (1974) Alterations in the outer membrane of the cell envelope of heptose-deficient mutants of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 117:527–543.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Lammel C. J.,
    2. Dekker N. P.,
    3. Palefsky J.,
    4. Brooks G. F.
    (1993) In vitro model of Haemophilus ducreyi adherence to and entry into eukaryotic cells of genital origin. J. Infect. Dis. 167:642–650.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. ↵
    1. Langford P. R.,
    2. Kroll J. S.
    (1997) Distribution, cloning, characterization and mutagenesis of sodC, the gene encoding copper/zinc superoxide dismutase, a potential determinant of virulence in Haemophilus ducreyi. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 17:235–242.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Lesse A. J.,
    2. Campagnari A. A.,
    3. Bittner W. E.,
    4. Apicella M. A.
    (1990) Increased resolution of lipopolysaccharides and lipooligosaccharides utilizing tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. J. Immunol. Methods 126:109–117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. ↵
    1. Mandrell R. E.,
    2. McLaughlin R.,
    3. Kwaik Y. A.,
    4. Lesse A.,
    5. Yamasaki R.,
    6. Gibson B.,
    7. Spinola S. M.,
    8. Apicella M. A.
    (1992) Lipooligosaccharides (LOS) of some Haemophilus species mimic human glycosphingolipids, and some LOS are sialylated. Infect. Immun. 60:1322–1328.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Melaugh W.,
    2. Campagnari A. A.,
    3. Gibson B. W.
    (1996) The lipooligosaccharides of Haemophilus ducreyi are highly sialylated. J. Bacteriol. 178:564–570.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Melaugh W.,
    2. Phillips N. J.,
    3. Campagnari A. A.,
    4. Tullius M. V.,
    5. Gibson B. W.
    (1994) Structure of the major oligosaccharide from the lipooligosaccharide of Haemophilus ducreyi strain 35000 and evidence of additional glycoforms. Biochemistry 33:13070–13078.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Nichols W. A.,
    2. Gibson B. W.,
    3. Melaugh W.,
    4. Lee N.-G.,
    5. Sunshine M.,
    6. Apicella M. A.
    (1997) Identification of the ADP-l-glycero-d-manno-heptose-6-epimerase (rfaD) and heptosyltransferase II (rfaF) biosynthesis genes from nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae 2019. Infect. Immun. 65:1377–1386.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Nichols W. A.,
    2. Raetz C. R. H.,
    3. Clementz T.,
    4. Smith A. L.,
    5. Hanson J. A.,
    6. Ketterer M. R.,
    7. Sunshine M.,
    8. Apicella M. A.
    (1997) htrB of Haemophilus influenzae: determination of biochemical activity and effects on virulence and lipooligosaccharide toxicity. J. Endotoxin Res. 8:585–588.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Nikaido H.,
    2. Vaara M.
    (1985) Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability. Microbiol. Rev. 49:1–32.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Palmer K. L.,
    2. Goldman W. E.,
    3. Munson R. S. Jr.
    (1996) An isogenic haemolysin-deficient mutant of Haemophilus ducreyi lacks the ability to produce cytopathic effects on human foreskin fibroblasts. Mol. Microbiol. 21:13–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. ↵
    1. Palmer K. L.,
    2. Grass S.,
    3. Munson R. S. Jr.
    (1994) Identification of a hemolytic activity elaborated by Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 62:3041–3043.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Palmer K. L.,
    2. Munson R. S. Jr.
    (1995) Cloning and characterization of the genes encoding the haemolysin of Haemophilus ducreyi. Mol. Microbiol. 18:821–830.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. ↵
    1. Palmer K. L.,
    2. Thornton A. C.,
    3. Fortney K. R.,
    4. Munson R. S. Jr.,
    5. Spinola S. M.
    (1998) Evaluation of an isogenic hemolysin-deficient mutant in the human model of Haemophilus ducreyi infection. J. Infect. Dis. 178:191–199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. ↵
    1. Parsons L. M.,
    2. Limberger R. J.,
    3. Shayegani M.
    (1997) Alterations in levels of DnaK and GroEL result in diminished survival and adherence of stressed Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 65:2413–2419.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Patrick C. C.,
    2. Kimura A.,
    3. Jackson M. A.,
    4. Hermanstorfer L.,
    5. Hood A.,
    6. McCracken G. H. Jr.,
    7. Hansen E. J.
    (1987) Antigenic characterization of the oligosaccharide portion of the lipooligosaccharide of nontypable Haemophilus influenzae. Infect. Immun. 55:2902–2911.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Petricoin E. F. III,
    2. Danaher R. J.,
    3. Stein D. C.
    (1991) Analysis of the lsi region involved in lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Bacteriol. 173:7896–7902.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Phillips N. J.,
    2. McLaughlin R.,
    3. Miller T. J.,
    4. Apicella M. A.,
    5. Gibson B. W.
    (1996) Characterization of two transposon mutants from Haemophilus influenzae type b with altered lipooligosaccharide biosynthesis. Biochemistry 35:5937–5947.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Purcell B. K.,
    2. Richardson J. A.,
    3. Radolf J. D.,
    4. Hansen E. J.
    (1991) A temperature-dependent rabbit model for production of dermal lesions by Haemophilus ducreyi. J. Infect. Dis. 164:359–367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. ↵
    1. Purvén M.,
    2. Frisk A.,
    3. Lönnroth I.,
    4. Lagergård T.
    (1997) Purification and identification of Haemophilus ducreyi cytotoxin by use of a neutralizing monoclonal antibody. Infect. Immun. 65:3496–3499.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Reeves P. R.,
    2. Hobbs M.,
    3. Valvano M. A.,
    4. Skurnik M.,
    5. Whitfield C.,
    6. Coplin D.,
    7. Kido N.,
    8. Klena J.,
    9. Maskell D.,
    10. Raetz C. R.,
    11. Rick P. D.
    (1996) Bacterial polysaccharide synthesis and gene nomenclature. Trends Microbiol. 4:495–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. ↵
    1. Roantree R. J.,
    2. Kuo T. T.,
    3. MacPhee D. G.
    (1977) The effect of defined lipopolysaccharide core defects upon antibiotic resistances of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Gen. Microbiol. 103:223–234.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. ↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y), 2nd ed.
  59. ↵
    1. San Mateo L. R.,
    2. Hobbs M. M.,
    3. Kawula T. H.
    (1998) Periplasmic copper-zinc superoxide dismutase protects Haemophilus ducreyi from exogenous superoxide. Mol. Microbiol. 27:391–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. ↵
    1. San Mateo L. R.,
    2. Toffer K. L.,
    3. Kawula T. H.
    (1998) The sodA gene of Haemophilus ducreyi expresses a hydrogen peroxide-inhibitable superoxide dismutase. Gene 207:251–257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Schnaitman C. A.,
    2. Klena J. D.
    (1993) Genetics of lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis in enteric bacteria. Microbiol. Rev. 57:655–682.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Schwan E. T.,
    2. Robertson B. D.,
    3. Brade H. B.,
    4. van Putten J. P. M.
    (1995) Gonococcal rfaF mutants express Rd2 chemotype LPS and do not enter epithelial host cells. Mol. Microbiol. 15:267–275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  63. ↵
    1. Schweda E. K. H.,
    2. Jonasson J. A.,
    3. Jansson P.-E.
    (1995) Structural studies of lipooligosaccharides from Haemophilus ducreyi ITM 5535, ITM 3147, and a fresh clinical isolate, ACY1: evidence for intrastrain heterogeneity with the production of mutually exclusive sialylated or elongated glycoforms. J. Bacteriol. 177:5316–5321.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Sirisena D. M.,
    2. MacLachlan P. R.,
    3. Liu S.-L.,
    4. Hessel A.,
    5. Sanderson K. E.
    (1994) Molecular analysis of the rfaD gene, for heptose synthesis, and the rfaF gene, for heptose transfer, in lipopolysaccharide synthesis in Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 176:2379–2385.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Spinola S. M.,
    2. Orazi A.,
    3. Arno J. N.,
    4. Fortney K. R.,
    5. Kotylo P.,
    6. Chen C.-Y.,
    7. Campagnari A. A.,
    8. Hood A. F.
    (1996) Haemophilus ducreyi elicits a cutaneous infiltrate of CD4 cells during experimental human infection. J. Infect. Dis. 173:394–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  66. ↵
    1. Spinola S. M.,
    2. Wild L. M.,
    3. Apicella M. A.,
    4. Gaspari A. A.,
    5. Campagnari A. A.
    (1994) Experimental human infection with Haemophilus ducreyi. J. Infect. Dis. 169:1146–1150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  67. ↵
    1. Stevens M. K.,
    2. Klesney-Tait J.,
    3. Lumbley S.,
    4. Walters K. A.,
    5. Joffe A. M.,
    6. Radolf J. D.,
    7. Hansen E. J.
    (1997) Identification of tandem genes involved in lipooligosaccharide expression by Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 65:651–660.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Stevens M. K.,
    2. Porcella S.,
    3. Klesney-Tait J.,
    4. Lumbley S.,
    5. Thomas S. E.,
    6. Norgard M. V.,
    7. Radolf J. D.,
    8. Hansen E. J.
    (1996) A hemoglobin-binding outer membrane protein is involved in virulence expression by Haemophilus ducreyi in an animal model. Infect. Immun. 64:1724–1735.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Stuy J. H.,
    2. Walter R. B.
    (1992) Cloning, characterization, and DNA base sequence of the high-level streptomycin resistance gene strA1 of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. J. Bacteriol. 174:5604–5608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Templeton N. S.
    (1992) The polymerase chain reaction: history, methods, and applications. Diagn. Mol. Pathol. 1:58–72.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Totten P. A.,
    2. Lara J. C.,
    3. Norn D. V.,
    4. Stamm W. E.
    (1994) Haemophilus ducreyi attaches to and invades human epithelial cells in vitro. Infect. Immun. 62:5632–5640.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Totten P. A.,
    2. Morton W. R.,
    3. Knitter G. H.,
    4. Clark A. M.,
    5. Kiviat N. B.,
    6. Stamm W. E.
    (1994) A primate model for chancroid. J. Infect. Dis. 169:1284–1290.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  73. ↵
    1. Totten P. A.,
    2. Norn D. V.,
    3. Stamm W. E.
    (1995) Characterization of the hemolytic activity of Haemophilus ducreyi. Infect. Immun. 63:4409–4416.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Trees D. L.,
    2. Arko R. J.,
    3. Morse S. A.
    (1991) Mouse subcutaneous chamber model for in vivo growth of Haemophilus ducreyi. Microb. Pathog. 11:387–390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Trees D. L.,
    2. Morse S. A.
    (1995) Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi: an update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:357–375.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Tsai C.-M.,
    2. Frasch C. E.
    (1982) A sensitive silver stain for detecting lipopolysaccharide in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 119:115–119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  77. ↵
    1. Tuffrey M.,
    2. Alexander F.,
    3. Ballard R. C.,
    4. Taylor-Robinson D.
    (1990) Characterization of skin lesions in mice following intradermal inoculation of Haemophilus ducreyi. J. Exp. Pathol. 71:233–244.
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Tullius M. V.,
    2. Munson R. S. Jr.,
    3. Wang J.,
    4. Gibson B. W.
    (1996) Purification, cloning, and expression of a cytidine 5′-monophosphate N -acetylneuraminic acid synthetase from Haemophilus ducreyi. J. Biol. Chem. 271:15373–15380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. ↵
    1. Weiser J. N.,
    2. Chong S. T. H.,
    3. Greenberg D.,
    4. Fong W.
    (1995) Identification and characterization of a cell envelope protein of Haemophilus influenzae contributing to phase variation in colony opacity and nasopharyngeal colonization. Mol. Microbiol. 17:555–564.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Weiser J. N.,
    2. Shchepetov M.,
    3. Chong S. T. H.
    (1997) Decoration of lipopolysaccharide with phosphorylcholine: a phase-variable characteristic of Haemophilus influenzae. Infect. Immun. 65:943–950.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Characterization of a WaaF (RfaF) Homolog Expressed by Haemophilus ducreyi
Beth A. Bauer, Sheryl R. Lumbley, Eric J. Hansen
Infection and Immunity Feb 1999, 67 (2) 899-907; DOI:

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of a WaaF (RfaF) Homolog Expressed by Haemophilus ducreyi
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
Share
Characterization of a WaaF (RfaF) Homolog Expressed by Haemophilus ducreyi
Beth A. Bauer, Sheryl R. Lumbley, Eric J. Hansen
Infection and Immunity Feb 1999, 67 (2) 899-907; DOI:
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522