Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Host Response and Inflammation

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Burkholderia cepacia Is More Active than LPS from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Stimulating Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha from Human Monocytes

Susu M. Zughaier, Henry C. Ryley, Simon K. Jackson
Susu M. Zughaier
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XN, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henry C. Ryley
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XN, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon K. Jackson
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Wales College of Medicine, Heath Park, Cardiff CF4 4XN, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.3.1505-1507.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Whole cells and lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) extracted fromBurkholderia cepacia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Escherichia coli were compared in their ability to stimulate tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) from the human monocyte cell line MonoMac-6.B. cepacia LPS, on a weight-for-weight basis, was found to have TNF-α-inducing activity similar to that of LPS from E. coli, which was approximately four- and eightfold greater than the activity of LPSs from P. aeruginosa and S. maltophilia, respectively. The LPS-stimulated TNF-α production from monocytes was found to be CD14 dependent. These results suggest that B. cepacia LPS might play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory lung disease in cystic fibrosis, and in some patients it might be responsible, at least in part, for the sepsis-like cepacia syndrome.

In recent years, Burkholderia cepacia infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients has become a clinical issue of increasing concern. B. cepacia is highly transmissible from person to person (4, 9) and intrinsically resistant to many antibiotics (3, 10). Once acquired,B. cepacia infection is rarely eradicated from the lungs of CF patients. In addition, a proportion of patients who acquire B. cepacia infection develop a rapidly fatal pneumonia and sepsis with a high mortality rate, the so-called cepacia syndrome (6, 8). However, the pathogenic mechanisms involved in this syndrome remain unclear. Indeed, the nature of the virulence factors that contribute to the pathogenicity of B. cepacia in CF remains largely unknown. Due to its potent inflammatory activity and association with sepsis, lipopolysaccharide (LPS) might be an important virulence factor in B. cepacia infections. Elevated tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) levels have been implicated in both systemic and local inflammations (7) and may play a role in cepacia syndrome (5). In this report, we studied the activity of B. cepacia whole cells as well as purified LPS in stimulating human monocytes to release TNF-α and compared it with the activities of other gram-negative bacteria that also colonize the lungs of CF patients, Pseudomonas aeruginosa andStenotrophomonas maltophilia. Patients carrying these organisms may, over time, suffer a chronic deterioration of lung function, but there are no reports that acquisition of these organisms is followed by the acute pulmonary deterioration sometimes seen inB. cepacia-infected patients. Escherichia coliwas included in this study since the LPS from this organism is often reported to represent the most biologically active form of LPS (11), and it is used as a reference standard for the measurement of LPS activity by the Limulus assay.

The human monocytic cell line MonoMac-6 (MM6) was obtained from the German collection of microorganisms and cell cultures (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen), Braunschweig, Germany. In this study, we used 13 B. cepacia clinical CF isolates (from 10 of which LPS was purified), 7 B. cepacia environmental isolates (from 4 of which LPS was purified), 8 S. maltophilia isolates (from all 8 of which LPS was purified), and 7 P. aeruginosaisolates (from all 7 of which LPS was purified). E. coliO111:B4 LPS was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., Poole, United Kingdom, and LPS was also purified from E. coli NCTC 10418. LPSs were purified by the phenol-water extraction method (2) and characterized by silver staining on a sodium dodecyl sulfate–14% polyacrylamide gel. Coomassie blue staining of the gels did not reveal any visible protein bands in the purified LPSs. The activity of different doses of LPS to produce TNF-α was established by stimulating MM6 cells with LPS concentrations ranging from 0.1 to 1000 ng/ml. However, at an LPS concentration above 500 ng/ml, the linearity of the TNF-α response decreased, and thus 500 ng of LPS per ml was used as the optimum concentration for this study. MM6 cells suspended at 106/ml of RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (Gibco) and 5 ng of phorbol myristate acetate per ml (13) were stimulated with 500 ng of LPS or 106CFU of whole bacteria (all bacterial isolates were grown under identical conditions). MM6 incubated with phorbol myristate acetate only (without LPS) did not produce any significant amounts of TNF-α. The cells were incubated overnight, and the supernatants were collected after centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 3 min followed by filtration through a 0.2-μm-pore-size syringe filter (Acrodisc; Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, Mich.). Supernatants were stored at −80°C until assayed. The TNF-α enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was performed with monoclonal anti-human TNF-α antibody and biotinylated anti-human TNF-α antibody (R & D, Minneapolis, Minn.) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical significance was calculated by the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test by using Minitab release 10 software. The role of CD14 in the LPS-stimulated TNF-α production was investigated by using monoclonal anti-human CD14 antibodies MY4 (Coulter Corporation, Miami, Fla.) and UCHM-1 (Sigma). The monoclonal anti-human CD7 antibody 3A1 (Sigma) was used as an isotype control antibody for MY4 (immunoglobulin G2b). Five microliters (2.5 μg) of monoclonal antibody was incubated with 106 MM6 cells at room temperature for 30 min, and the cells were then washed with RPMI 1640 medium to remove unbound antibody. The MM6 cells were then stimulated with 500 ng of LPS. The TNF-α produced was measured by an ELISA as described above.

Figure 1 shows the TNF-α production in MM6 cells stimulated with different doses of LPS. All of the LPS preparations used gave a dose response for TNF-α production, although there was variation in the total TNF-α stimulated by each type of LPS. A 500-ng/ml dose of LPS was found to be optimal for each LPS type for TNF-α production. Therefore, the different LPS types were compared at this dose. The ELISA results (Fig.2) showed that B. cepacia LPS from CF patients induced a concentration of TNF-α similar to that induced by E. coli LPS (mean TNF-α concentration of 4,000 pg/ml). On the other hand, B. cepacia LPS from environmental isolates had half the activity (2,000 pg/ml) of that from CF isolates (Fig. 2). Moreover, LPS from B. cepacia CF isolates had fourfold the activity of P. aeruginosa LPS (1,000 pg/ml) and eightfold the activity of S. maltophilia LPS (500 pg/ml). TNF-α stimulated by the corresponding whole bacterial cells showed a similar pattern to that produced by the extracted LPS (Fig. 2). If LPS-mediated macrophage stimulation plays a role in the development of inflammatory lung pathology, the differences in the TNF-α stimulatory activity between LPSs from B. cepacia, P. aeruginosa, and S. maltophilia may in part explain the different pathogenic sequelae observed with lung infections due to these organisms in CF patients. S. maltophilia, in particular, is similar to B. cepacia in many aspects, such as high patient-to-patient infection rate, resistance to most antibiotics, and no significant exotoxin production. However, unlike the case with B. cepacia, despite numerous investigations, there have yet to be reports of acute pulmonary inflammation occurring following S. maltophilia acquisition (1).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Dose response of LPS-induced TNF-α production from stimulated MM6 cells. MM6 cells (106/ml) were incubated with 0.1 to 500 ng of LPS per ml, and TNF-α production was measured by an ELISA. The TNF-α produced was proportional to the LPS concentration up to an LPS dose of 500 ng/ml. Bars represent the mean (+ standard error) of four separate experiments.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

TNF-α production by MM6 cells stimulated by whole bacteria and the extracted LPS. The bars show the mean (+ standard error) of TNF-α production in response to the different LPS types (number of different isolates = 4 to 10 in each group) from four separate experiments. ∗, P = 0.021; ∗∗, P = 0.0054; ∗∗∗, P = 0.00012 (all versus results forB. cepacia [B.cep.] CF isolates). P.aerug, P. aeruginosa; S.malto, S. maltophila.

To study the role of CD14 in B. cepacia LPS-mediated TNF-α stimulation, monoclonal anti-human CD14 antibodies were used to block CD14 binding sites and consequently inhibit TNF-α production. When monoclonal antibodies were added, TNF-α production was significantly inhibited following B. cepacia LPS stimulation in comparison with TNF-α production in control cells or those cells incubated with the isotype antibody (Fig. 3). We found similar results with S. maltophilia and P. aeruginosa. Contrary to a previous report by Shaw et al. (12), our investigations suggest that B. cepaciaLPS-mediated TNF-α stimulation is almost completely mediated by CD14.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Production of TNF-α from MM6 cells stimulated withB. cepacia LPS (500 ng/ml) and in the presence of the anti-CD14 monoclonal antibodies MY4 and UCHM-1 and the MY4 isotype control anti-CD7. ∗∗, P = 0.0004 versus results for LPS alone. IgG, immunoglobulin G.

We conclude that B. cepacia LPS is a potent immunostimulator and that chronic colonization may lead to LPS shedding and TNF-α production, resulting in tissue damage and lung inflammation.

Notes

Editor: R. N. Moore

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 15 June 1998.
    • Returned for modification 26 August 1998.
    • Accepted 19 November 1998.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Denton M.
    Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging problem in cystic fibrosis patients.Rev. Med. Microbiol.819971519
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    1. Galanos C.,
    2. Luderitz O.,
    3. Westphal O.
    A new method for the extraction of R-lipopolysaccharide.Eur. J. Biochem.91969245249
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Goldman D. A.,
    2. Klinger J. D.
    Pseudomonas cepacia: biology, mechanisms of virulence, epidemiology.J. Pediatr.1081986806812
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Govan J. R. W.,
    2. Brown P. H.,
    3. Maddison J.,
    4. et al.
    Evidence of transmission of Pseudomonas cepacia by social contact in cystic fibrosis.Lancet34219931519
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Govan J. R. W.,
    2. Hughes J. E.,
    3. Vandamme P.
    Burkholderia cepacia: medical, taxonomic and ecological issues.J. Med. Microbiol.451996395407
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Govan J. R. W.,
    2. Nelson J. W.
    Microbiology of lung infection in cystic fibrosis.Br. Med. Bull.481992912930
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Greally P.,
    2. Hussein M. J.,
    3. Cook A. J.,
    4. Sampson A. P.,
    5. Piper P. J.,
    6. Price J. F.
    Sputum tumor necrosis factor-α and leukotriene concentrations in cystic fibrosis.Arch. Dis. Child.681993389392
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Lancet Pseudomonas cepacia—more than a harmless commensal? Lancet 339 June 6, 1992 1385 1386 (Editorial.)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Lipuma J. J.,
    2. Dasen S. E.,
    3. Neilson D. W.,
    4. Stern R. C.,
    5. Stull T. L.
    Person-to-person transmission of Pseudomonas cepacia between patients with cystic fibrosis.Lancet3361990527532
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. 10.↵
    1. Prince A.
    Antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas species.J. Pediatr.1081986830834
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Riestschel E.-T.,
    2. Brade L.,
    3. Lindner B.,
    4. Zahringer U.
    Biochemistry of lipopolysaccharides Bacterial endotoxic lipopolysaccharides. Morrison D. C., Ryan J. L. 1992 3 41 CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Fla
  12. 12.↵
    1. Shaw D.,
    2. Poxton I. R.,
    3. Govan J. R. W.
    Biological activity of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia lipopolysaccharide.FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.11199599106
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. Watanabe N.,
    2. Nakada K.,
    3. Kobayashi Y.
    Processing and release of tumor necrosis factor α.Eur. J. Biochem.2531998576582
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Burkholderia cepacia Is More Active than LPS from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Stimulating Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha from Human Monocytes
Susu M. Zughaier, Henry C. Ryley, Simon K. Jackson
Infection and Immunity Mar 1999, 67 (3) 1505-1507; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.3.1505-1507.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Burkholderia cepacia Is More Active than LPS from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Stimulating Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha from Human Monocytes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Burkholderia cepacia Is More Active than LPS from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Stimulating Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha from Human Monocytes
Susu M. Zughaier, Henry C. Ryley, Simon K. Jackson
Infection and Immunity Mar 1999, 67 (3) 1505-1507; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.3.1505-1507.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Burkholderia cepacia
Lipopolysaccharides
monocytes
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522