Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Immunity and Vaccines

Disruption of Anthrax Toxin Binding with the Use of Human Antibodies and Competitive Inhibitors

Nick M. Cirino, Daniele Sblattero, David Allen, Scott R. Peterson, James D. Marks, Paul J. Jackson, Andrew Bradbury, Bruce E. Lehnert
Nick M. Cirino
Life Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniele Sblattero
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy 34013; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Allen
Life Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Scott R. Peterson
Life Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James D. Marks
Department of Anesthesia and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul J. Jackson
Life Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Bradbury
International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy 34013; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce E. Lehnert
Life Sciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.6.2957-2963.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The protective antigen (PA83) of Bacillus anthracis is integral to the mechanism of anthrax toxicity. We have isolated a human single-chain Fv antibody fragment (scFv) that blocks binding of a fluorescently tagged protective antigen (PA) moiety to cell surface receptors. Several phage-displayed scFv were isolated from a naive library biopanned against PA83. Soluble, monomeric scFv were characterized for affinity and screened for their capacity to disrupt receptor-mediated binding of PA. Four unique scFv bound to PA83, as determined by surface plasmon resonance, the tightest binder exhibiting a Kd of 50 nM. Two scFv had similar affinities for natural PA83 and a novel, recombinant, 32-kDa carboxy-terminal PA fragment (PA32). Binding of scFv to green fluorescent protein fused to the amino-terminal 32-kDa fragment of B. anthracis edema factor, EGFP-EF32, was used to confirm specificity. Fusion of EGFP to PA32 facilitated development of a novel flow cytometric assay that showed that one of the scFv disrupted PA receptor binding. This method can now be used as a rapid assay for small molecule inhibitors of PA binding to cell receptors. The combined data presented suggest the potential utility of human scFv as prophylactics against anthrax poisoning. Moreover, recombinant PA32 may also be useful as a therapeutic agent to compete with anthrax toxins for cellular receptors during active infection.

The mechanism of anthrax intoxication is relatively well understood (20). The current model suggests that an 83-kDa form of protective antigen (PA83) is secreted from rapidly growing Bacillus anthracis cells and binds to a specific, but as yet unidentified, host cell surface receptor (8). Subsequent cleavage by membrane-bound furin (11, 17) and/or a furin-like protease, possibly PACE4 (12), releases an amino-terminal 20-kDa PA83 fragment, resulting in receptor-bound PA63. The newly exposed surface on PA63 contains a single, high-affinity binding site that is recognized by the amino termini of both the lethal factor and edema factor components of the toxin complexes (23, 25, 33). Endocytosis of the receptor-toxin complex into acidic endosomes elicits a conformational change in PA63 whereby the A subunits (LF or EF) of the toxin are released into the endosome (10). The PA63-receptor complexes then oligomerize into a heptameric ring (30, 31). Lysosomal acidification and subsequent receptor release facilitates irreversible membrane insertion of the oligomeric PA63 pore (2, 18, 52). The pore elicits transport of LF and/or EF into the cytoplasm, where they elicit their respective toxicities. EF is a calcium-calmodulin-dependent adenylate cyclase that is toxic to most cell types and causes local inflammation and edema but is not usually lethal (21, 37). LF is a cell-type-specific metalloprotease that cleaves mitogen-activated protein kinase-kinases (7, 51) and several peptide hormones (14). Lethal factor is the major virulence factor associated with anthrax toxicity and is responsible for systemic shock and death associated with a hyperoxidative burst and cytokine release from macrophages (15, 37). Neither of the toxin A subunits are pathogenic in the absence of cytoplasmic delivery by PA or mechanical means (10).

The crystal structures of PA83 and heptameric PA63 have been solved (36). These structural data support the experimental data (26, 46) that indicate that domain 4, the carboxy terminus of PA63, is responsible for receptor-mediated uptake of the toxin complex. Therefore, antibodies generated against domain 4 of PA could be potential candidates for toxicity neutralization by interfering with PA binding to its host receptor. Additionally, a recombinant PA fragment containing domain 4 might possibly compete with native PA83 for its receptors, thereby inhibiting the first step required for toxin complex formation (22, 26).

Virulent B. anthracis continues to represent a significant health threat. Accordingly, we have set out to search for inhibitors of anthrax toxicity and to develop a rapid screen for the identification of such inhibitors. To these ends, we screened a naive single-chain Fv phagemid library for antibodies that bind native B. anthracis PA83. We have also assessed a soluble, recombinant fragment of PA (i.e., PA32) for use as a potential inhibitor of PA binding to cells. To screen these single-chain FV fragments (scFv) for inhibitory properties, we developed a high-throughput flow cytometric competition assay with a fluorescently tagged form of PA32. In addition to its usefulness in assaying scFv, this fragment may also have therapeutic potential as a novel vaccine candidate or as a competitive inhibitor of anthrax toxins.

Phage display is a powerful tool with which moderate to high-affinity ligands can be rapidly isolated from diverse peptide or antibody libraries (53). Generation of naive antibody libraries, which are synthesized from nonimmunized human rearranged V genes (28, 50), allows selection against a myriad of possible substrates. Isolation of antibody fragments from naive libraries has proven to be highly efficient against numerous targets, including viruses (3, 47), cytokines (19), hormones (6, 50), growth factor receptors (54), and tissue- or tumor-specific markers (16, 34, 42, 48). Phage display-isolated scFv have been used clinically for diagnostic imaging (32), and the potential uses of these recognition elements in both detection and therapeutics are vast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture.Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-K1, ATCC CCL-61) were cultured in minimal essential medium (MEM; Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Hyclone), 100 U of penicillin per ml, and 100 μg of streptomycin (Life Technologies) per ml. A549 human lung carcinoma alveolar epithelial cells (ATCC CCL-185) were cultured in RPMI 1640 culture medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FBS and the antibiotics mentioned above. Both cell types were released from culture flasks by incubation in 1 mM trypsin-EDTA (Life Technologies) for 3 min at 37°C. Cells were washed once in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and diluted to 103/ml in the appropriate culture medium for passage to new flasks. For immunofluorescent microscopy, cells were cultured on LabTec2 (Nalge-Nunc) slides. For flow cytometric assay, cells were released with trypsin-EDTA and washed once in culture medium and once in PBS before subsequent treatments.

Protective antigen and edema factor cloning.PCR withPfu polymerase (Stratagene) was carried out on a Perkin-Elmer 9600 thermal cycler at an annealing temperature of 52°C for an extension time of 5 min. The forward and reverse primers for PA32 were 5′-TCGCACTCGAGGGCGCGCATGCCGCCGAAACAACTGCACGTATCATTand 5′-ACTGAGCTCAGCGCTAGCGCCACCAGAACCGCCTCCTATCTCATAGCCTTTTT, respectively (sequences complementary to PA83 are in italics). Template was B. anthracis Sterne strain pXO1 obtained from D. Robertson of Brigham Young University (40). The amplified PCR product was 809 nucleotides long (PA sequence 3346 to 4095; GenBank accession number M22586 ) and contained restriction sites forXhoI and BssHII at the 5′ end andBpu1102I and NheI at the 3′ end, respectively. PCR products were gel purified and cut with the appropriate enzyme pairs (i.e., XhoI and Bpu1102I) for ligation into pET15b (Novagen) expression vector. This vector adds a hexahistidine tag to the amino terminus of expressed proteins. DNA sequencing was performed to confirm the correct construction. The BssHII and NheI sites were included for cloning into a different vector not used in these studies. The pET15b-expressed protein contained the B. anthracis mature PA sequence from E486 to G735, which includes the experimentally defined PA receptor binding domain. These constructs were then transformed into Escherichia coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS) (Stratagene). Bacteria were grown in Luria-Bertani broth supplemented with 50 μg of ampicillin and 34 μg of chloramphenicol per ml. Induction by the addition of 1.5 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was performed at 37°C for 4 h. Then, 10 to 20 mg of PA32 was purified from cleared bacterial lysates from a 1-liter mid-log-phase shaker culture passed through a 2-ml Talon metal affinity resin (Clontech) column according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

The sequence encoding the B. anthracis edema factor amino terminus (accession number M23179 ) was cloned into pET15b, generating EF32. PCR forward and reverse primers were 5′-GCTCGAGAATGAACATTACACTG and 5′-CGCTCAGCACCTTCTTTCTTCAAACTTTC, respectively. They contained XhoI and Bpu1102I restriction sites, respectively (sequences complementary to EF89 are in italics). This edema factor fragment (amino acids N35 to G289) was cloned because the resultant EF fragment retains its ability to bind PA63 yet is enzymatically inactive (52).

EGFP fusion cloning.The enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) sequence from Clontech was amplified with the forward and reverse primers 5′-GGAATTCCATATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAGCTGTTCACC and 5′-CCGCTCGAGATCTGAGTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCC, respectively, and ligated into pET15b/PA32 or pET15b/EF32 between the NdeI and XhoI sites. These chimeric constructs were transformed into E. coliBL21(DE3)(pLysS). Bacteria expressing recombinant proteins were grown and induced as outlined above. Recombinant proteins were purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) as previously outlined.

PA83 isolation.PA83 was purified as previously described (39). Briefly, clarified supernatant was collected from a 20-liter culture of pX02-cured Sterne strain of B. anthraciscontaining mutants LF and EF. A 20% ammonium sulfate precipitation was used to enrich PA83 relative to other secreted proteins. Subsequent fast-performance liquid chromatography purifications were performed by using Mono-Q (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and gel filtration (Sephadex G-75; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) columns. The final protein preparation was >90% pure as determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

scFv display, isolation, purification, and characterization.A naive scFv phagemid library (6 × 109 diversity [43]) was selected against PA83 according to earlier protocols (41). Three rounds of biopanning were performed in Nunc Immuno-tubes. Washing after each selection round consisted of 20 washes with PBS-Tween 20 (0.1% [vol/vol]), followed by 20 washes with PBS. Phage were eluted with 100 mM triethylamine (pH 12) and then neutralized with 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 7.4). Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed by using 96-well plates coated with 1 μg of PA83. Anti-M13–horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (Pharmacia Biotech) was used for colorimetric detection with tetramethyl benzidine (Sigma) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Fingerprint analysis of PCR-amplified antibody variable (Fv) regions from ELISA-positive phage with BstNI restriction enzyme was used to identify unique isolates. Plasmids containing the isolated antibody clones were transformed into E. coliBL21(DE3)(pLysS), and soluble antibody fragment production was induced by stimulation with 1.5 mM IPTG for 6 h at 30°C. A periplasmic preparation was produced as previously described (41), and His-tagged scFv were isolated by IMAC. Monomeric scFv were isolated by size exclusion chromatography with Superdex 75 (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) as previously described (41).

Binding analysis by SPR.All protein-binding experiments were conducted in a BIAcore 2000 system (Pharmacia Biosensors). This system characterizes biomolecular interactions by using a noninvasive optical detection principle (i.e., surface plasmon resonance [SPR]). SPR reflects a change in mass concentration at the detector surface as molecules bind or dissociate. One component, the ligand, is covalently attached to a single channel of the flowcell surface. The other component (i.e., analyte) is injected in a continuous flow over the flowcell surface. PA83, PA32, EGFP-PA32, and EGFP-EF32 were coupled to four different channels on a CM5 dextran sensor chip in 10 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.8) via the amine group of lysines ontoN-hydroxysuccinimide/N-ethyl-N-(3-diethylamino-propyl)carbodiimide (NHS/EDC)-activated chip surfaces. All ligands were coupled to less than 1,000 resonance units (RU) per channel. Single-chain Fv selected against PA83 were dialyzed extensively against PBS and passed over immobilized ligand at a flow rate of 40 μl/min in PBS. A total of 80 μl of analyte was injected and run over successive channels of ligands in a single flowcell. Four concentrations, ranging from 2 to 100 nM for each analyte, were assessed and used for binding analysis. Curves were fit to a 1:1 stoichiometry of binding with mass transfer compensation. The flowcell was regenerated between samples by using a 4 M MgCl2 solution without a significant change in baseline.

Immunoflourescent microscopy.Recombinant PA32 was covalently labeled with Texas red as described by the manufacturer (Molecular Probes). Briefly, 1.5 mg of Texas red-X succinimidyl ester was dissolved in 150 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide (final concentration, 12 mM). Then, 4 μl of this soluble dye was added to 50 μl of 100 μM PA32, giving a molar ratio of 10:1. Conjugation proceeded for 30 min at 30°C, followed by another 30 min at 4°C. Unconjugated dye was removed by separation through a Microcon 10 column (Amicon, Inc.). CHO cells were cultured on LabTek2 slides to 80% confluency. Cells were washed twice with cold MEM and stored at 4°C until use. Then, 1 nmol of fluorescently labeled PA32 was added, and the temperature was shifted to 37°C for different time periods. Cells were then fixed in 100% methanol for 15 min, washed once in PBS, and then covered with glycerol mounting medium. PA32 labeling of the cells was photographed by using a ×60 oil immersion objective on a charge-coupled device camera-equipped Axioskop Zeiss microscope (the Zeiss filter for Texas red was 00 and for EGFP was 09). A 100-W Mercury lamp was used for excitation of the fluorophores.

Flow cytometry assay.Flow cytometry was performed on a Fisher FACSCaliber apparatus with Cellquest software (Becton Dickinson). Cells were diluted to 106/ml, and 10,000 events were collected. The forward-scatter detector was E-1 (gain, 350), the side-scatter detector was set at 350, and the green fluorescence detector (FL1) was set at 500 on a log scale. Cells were washed once in PBS, diluted to 106/ml in PBS containing 1.5% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin (Sigma), and agitated for 2 h at 4°C to block nonspecific protein binding. Aliquots (0.5 ml) of cells were then dispensed into chilled 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes. EGFP or EGFP fusion proteins in PBS were added to a 0.2 μM final concentration and allowed to bind for 1 h at 4°C with moderate agitation. Cells were centrifuged at 2,000 × g for 3 min, decanted, resuspended in 1 ml of PBS containing 0.1% (wt/vol) bovine serum albumin, and then analyzed. For competition experiments, nonfluorescent PA83 or PA32 was added to the cells prior to EGFP-PA32. For analysis of scFv inhibition, EGFP-PA32 was incubated with different antibody fragments for 2 h at 4°C prior to the addition to A549 cells.

RESULTS

SDS-PAGE analysis of purified recombinant and natural PA proteins.Purification of the native PA83 as described above yielded a >90%-pure protein preparation (Fig.1, lane 6). Purification of recombinant anthrax proteins was performed by IMAC in a single step. All IMAC-purified proteins were >95% homogeneous after elution as determined by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 1, lanes 2 to 5). A recombinant PA comprised of the carboxy-terminal 32-kDa protein (Fig. 1, lane 3) is highly soluble in E. coli and did not appear to be toxic to the bacteria. PA32 was also cloned as a fusion protein with a green fluorescent protein variant (EGFP) attached to its amino terminus. The EGFP-PA32 fusion (Fig. 1, lane 4) was designed for use in a flow cytometry assay, where inhibitors of PA receptor binding could be analyzed. As controls for the different assays, His-tagged EGFP (full-length 31-kDa band in Fig. 1, lane 2 [kindly donated by Tracy Ruscetti of Los Alamos National Laboratory]) and chimeric EGFP-EF32 (Fig. 1, lane 5) were expressed and purified similarly to the recombinant PA32 proteins.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Coomassie and SDS-PAGE analysis of purified proteins. Lanes: 1, prestained molecular weight markers; 2, recombinant EGFP; 3, recombinant PA32; 4, recombinant EGFP-PA32 fusion; 5, recombinant EGFP-EF32 fusion; 6, natural PA83. A total of 250 ng of each purified protein was analyzed on an SDS–12% polyacrylamide gel after IMAC (lanes 2 to 5) or Mono-Q and gel filtration chromatography (lane 6).

Characterization of isolated scFv.Synthetic, recombinant, scFv from a naive phage display library were biopanned against PA83. After three rounds of selection, 60 of 90 isolates showed PA binding ability, as determined by ELISA (data not shown). Fingerprint analysis revealed seven unique isolates, of which five with the highest ELISA scores were chosen for further analysis (Table1). These scFv were expressed and purified by IMAC and size exclusion chromatography (see Materials and Methods) to isolate monomeric scFv. This was necessary in order to assess the affinity of the antibodies in the absence of avidity effects due to diabody or larger aggregate formation (e.g., one of the antibody fragments, scFv5, showed >90% multimerization and was therefore excluded from subsequent analysis [Table 1]). This procedure yielded >95%-pure antibodies as determined by SDS-PAGE (Fig.2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Analysis of anti-PA83-selected scFv

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Coomassie and SDS-PAGE analysis of anti-PA83 selected single-chain Fv. Lanes: 1, prestained molecular weight markers; 2 to 5, scFv1, scFv4, scFv12, and scFv24, respectively. A total of 500 ng of each purified protein was analyzed on an SDS–12% polyacrylamide gel after IMAC chromatography.

Characterization of scFv binding affinities to PA.PA83 was coupled to a BIAcore CM5 chip (∼1,000 RU), and four dilutions of each of the purified, monomeric scFv were used to determine equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd). All of the scFv tested showed similar affinities (Table 1). The overall affinities of these antibody fragments are consistent with models that predict submicromolar affinities for naive libraries of this size (35). These scFv were further assessed for their ability to recognize the recombinant PA32 fragment. PA83, EGFP-PA32, PA32, and EGFP-EF32 were coupled to different channels on a single BIAcore CM5 flowcell. Different scFv were sequentially passed over each channel of the chip, and their affinities were determined (Fig.3). All ligands were coupled at ∼1,000 RU, and a single concentration of analyte was assessed. There is good agreement in the Kd values for the different scFv binding to PA83 when Table 1 and Fig. 3 are compared. Kd values of less than 10−7 M were apparent for all three antibodies directed against PA83. Baseline, nonspecific binding was evident in all three scFv ( Kdof ∼10−2 M) passed over nontarget EGFP-EF32. scFv1 and scFv4 showed similar affinities for PA83 and PA32 ligands, whereas scFv12 showed only nonspecific binding to PA32 proteins (Fig. 3). These data indicate that the targets for scFv1 and scFv4 lie within domains 3 or 4 of PA, while the antigenic site for scFv12 is outside this region.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Affinities of anti-PA83-selected single-chain Fv determined by SPR. Kd values were determined by SPR in a BIAcore apparatus. Affinities of selected scFv for natural PA83 (solid bars), recombinant EGFP-PA32 (striped bars), and recombinant EGFP-EF32 (open bars) are shown.

Confirmation of PA32 cell binding and internalization.The above SPR data suggested that the expressed PA32 fragment was correctly folded, at least in terms of epitope presentation, and could be used as a reporter to monitor PA-receptor interaction. Purified, recombinant PA32 was covalently cross-linked to the fluorophore, Texas red. This fluorescent PA32 was added to serum-deficient CHO cell cultures. Receptor internalization was induced by a shift in temperature from 4 to 37°C for different times (Fig. 4). There was a time-dependent internalization of fluorescence into discreet structures, presumably endosomes, within the cytoplasm of these cells. No fluorophore internalization was seen if the cells were kept at 4°C, and the fluorescent label was not observed in nuclei, even at 6 h post-temperature release (data not shown). These data indicate that the PA32 fragment is recognized similarly to natural PA83 and is internalized into cytoplasmic vesicles. To prove specific receptor-mediated uptake, a more quantitative measure was needed.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Immunofluorescent microscopy of fluorescently labeled PA32 uptake by CHO cells. Texas red-labeled, recombinant PA32 was incubated for the indicated times at 37°C with adherent CHO cells. After being washed, cells were fixed and photographed. Note the time-dependent cytoplasmic inclusion of labeled PA fragment.

Development of rapid flow assay to assess PA32-receptor interactions.A flow cytometric assay was developed using the EGFP-PA32 fusion protein. Human A549 cells were used as target cells because of their low autofluorescence and minimal phagocytic activity. EGFP alone or the EGFP-EF32 fusion was used to evaluate nonspecific binding by these cells. Initial experiments were performed to ensure significant separation of nonspecific and receptor-mediated protein binding. As shown in Fig. 5A, there was a fourfold-enhanced signal from specific EGFP-PA32 bound to cells compared to nonspecific EGFP binding alone. To confirm that EGFP-PA32 was binding to the PA-specific receptor, competition with different concentrations of natural PA83 or unlabeled PA32 was assessed. There was a statistically significant (P < 0.0001) linear inhibition of fluorescent-PA32 binding by unlabeled PA molecules (Fig.5B). For a 1:1 stoichiometry of PA-receptor binding, we would expect 50% inhibition by an equimolar concentration of unlabeled PA (i.e., 50% EGFP-PA32, 50% competitor). These data confirm specificity and indicate little or no cooperativity in PA-receptor interactions.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Flow cytometric analysis of specific EGFP-PA32 binding by a human epithelial cell line. (A) Green fluorescence signal from nonlabeled (A549, solid area), nonspecifically labeled (EGFP, striped area), and specifically labeled (EGFP-PA32, open area) A549 human epithelial cells. The number of cells is recorded on the ordinate; the log fluorescence intensity is recorded on the abscissa. There is very good separation between nonspecific and specific labeling of cells. (B) Inhibition of EGFP-PA32 signal by unlabeled PA. Linear correlation between the percent unlabeled competitor PA (unlabeled PA/[unlabeled PA plus EGFP-PA32] × 100) and the percent inhibition of mean fluorescent signal. A 95% confidence interval is shown (dotted line). (C) Inhibition of EGFP-PA32- mediated fluorescent signal by unlabeled PA molecules (data from Fig. 5B) or an equimolar concentration of single-chain Fv (scFv1, scFv4, and scFv12). Bars represent the mean and standard error for the indicated number of experiments (boxed numbers).

Inhibition of receptor-mediated EGFP-PA32 binding by scFv targeted to PA.This flow cytometric analysis was subsequently used to screen scFv for their ability to disrupt PA-receptor interactions. Incubation of scFv4 with EGFP-PA32 at a 1:1 molar ratio was able to significantly (>80%) abolish receptor-mediated binding of EGFP-PA32 to A549 cells (Fig. 5C). A 10-fold molar excess of scFv4 showed little additional inhibition (data not shown) as would be expected for a monovalent competition. The scFv1, which can recognize EGFP-PA32 (Fig.3), showed minimal inhibition of EGFP-PA32 binding by this assay. This indicates that it does not recognize or mask an essential structure necessary for receptor recognition. The scFv12 did not inhibit binding as expected since it did not recognize the C-terminal PA32 protein (Fig. 3). For comparison, the means of the dose-dependent competition with unlabeled PA are also shown in Fig. 5C. These data indicate that the flow cytometric assay is a sensitive and specific method for identifying molecules which inhibit receptor-mediated anthrax toxin binding and that one of the scFv selected has the potential to inhibit PA binding to cells in a therapeutically useful fashion.

DISCUSSION

The first step in anthrax intoxication is the binding of PA83 to a yet-to-be-characterized host cell surface receptor. Subsequent PA cleavage by a host cellular protease(s) is necessary for toxin A subunit (LF and EF) binding as well as for PA multimerization and pore formation. The main goal of the present study was to generate molecules of potential therapeutic value that can inhibit PA-receptor interactions.

Previous investigations have shown that a vaccine containing only PA83 protected guinea pigs against lethal B. anthracis spore challenge, and PA-specific neutralizing monoclonal antibodies were able to delay the time of death (24). Such evidence suggests the possibility that high-affinity human antibodies generated against PA may offer a significant therapeutic advantage as well. Accordingly, in the first component of our study we set out to isolate several human, single-chain antibody fragments that can bind to PA in a manner that may interfere with PA-receptor binding.

The use of natural and recombinant antibodies or antibody fragments to treat disease is at the forefront of many new therapeutic approaches. A large proportion of new compounds in current clinical trials are human antibody derivatives. Indeed, the first phage display-isolated antibodies (directed against tumor necrosis factor alpha) are now being used as immunoglobulin therapeutics in phase II clinical trials for rheumatoid arthritis (29). There are many methods by which in vitro selection (i.e., the separation of binding clones from nonbinding clones) of displayed antibodies can be performed. These include biopanning of immobilized antigen on various substrates, including plastic solid supports (as described here), columns (13), BIAcore chips (27), fixed cells (5), or even tissue sections (49). By selecting against purified PA83 on a solid plastic support which does not orient the bound protein, we forced selection against all portions of PA83. We isolated several unique, high-affinity clones which were against different epitopes as determined by the ability to bind the PA32 subdomain of PA83. These scFv were used for Western blotting and immunoprecipitations (data not shown) and were screened for the potential to disrupt host cell receptor binding. Isolation of neutralizing scFv from naive libraries is less efficient than from immune libraries, yet we were able to identify an scFv which could inhibit receptor-mediated binding of PA to cells. Another potential use for such scFv is as recognition elements for biosensors. If the affinities of the scFv described above are not sufficiently high for use as biosensor recognition elements, their affinities can be increased by chain shuffling (41) or parsimonious mutagenesis. Alternatively, scFv isolated from immune libraries have generally shown higher affinities. We are therefore in the process of generating an immune scFv library from PA-immunized individuals for use in isolating higher-affinity antibody fragments.

In a second component of our study, we also explored the possibility that a recombinant fragment of PA that lacks the ability to bind toxin A subunits or multimerize but that remains capable of binding to cell surface receptors may also potentially competitively inhibit the binding of intact PA. In this regard, preliminary work by Leppla (22) to generate a recombinant carboxyl-terminal PA fragment indicated that a fragment from T624-G735 could not compete with radiolabeled PA83 for receptors. This work was completed prior to the crystal structure solution by Petosa et al. (36). We postulated that the amino terminus of the recombinant protein should be at a structural domain boundary defined by the crystal structure to retain structural integrity. For this reason, we attempted to clone domain 4 alone (i.e., F596-G735, PA18) and domains 3 and 4 together (i.e., E486-G735, PA32). We were unable to clone domain 4 alone for unknown reasons, but we were able to successfully clone domains 3 and 4 together. We believe the reason PA32 (domains 3 and 4) is able to compete for receptors is that the protein is structurally more stable than the T624-G735 fragment tested by Leppla and coworkers. This hypothesis is supported by our SPR results that show that several of the anti-PA83 scFv also bind to PA32, i.e., the molecule evidently is folded in a manner that preserves epitopes common to native PA. The ability of PA32 to interact with its host cell surface receptor (Fig. 4and 5A) and be internalized (Fig. 4) favorably supports the possibility that this PA fragment may be effective as an antitoxin treatment during anthrax infection.

The human anthrax vaccine used in the United States and other western countries consists of aluminum hydroxide-adsorbed supernatant material from cultures of toxigenic, nonencapsulated B. anthracisstrains. Current protocols for isolating native PA83, the primary immunogen in the vaccine, from culture supernatants are time- and cost-intensive (38). Immunization with this vaccine can cause local edema and erythema, probably due to the presence of trace amounts of LF or EF (9), and frequent boosters are required (4). The recombinant form of PA generated for our studies is safer to manufacture (i.e., no B. anthracis cultures necessary) and simpler to purify and has no chance of “carrying” other toxin components through the manufacturing process. A simple, one-step IMAC separation purifies the recombinant PA more effectively than the standard three-step protocol normally used to purify natural PA83 (39). It has been shown that only immunization with PA, and not LF or EF, can protect against lethal B. anthracischallenge in a guinea pig model (24). It has been suggested that the reduced protection seen with some recombinant PA vaccine preparations may be due to lack of contaminating LF or EF. Dual vaccination with PA32 and LF or EF would be possible since the A toxin subunits cannot interact with recombinant PA32. A similar approach was developed by Singh et al. (44) by using recombinant PA molecules that bind receptors but not LF or EF. The approach of Singh et al. was to mutate the conserved PA83 RKKR protease site to prevent the EF or LF binding site from being exposed by furin cleavage and PA20 release. Immunization of guinea pigs with this cleavage-resistant PA vaccine led to significant protection against otherwise-lethal anthrax infection (45). PA32 offers several advantages over the current human vaccine. The receptor-binding region is a higher proportion of the total immunogenic surface, suggesting that a higher proportion of antibodies will be neutralizing. E. coliexpression and IMAC purification are extremely efficient. Being structurally truncated, the PA32 molecule is unable to interact with toxin A subunits and thus is nontoxic, and this PA fragment is unable to form pores due to absence of the D2L2 loop of domain 2 (1). As with the single-chain antibody (scFv4) that interferes with PA-receptor binding, the potential usefulness of PA32 as a therapeutic or prophylactic agent requires further in vitro and in vivo analyses.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Theresa M. Koehler of the University of Texas—Houston Medical School for assistance in producing B. anthracis PA83 and Tracy Ruscetti and Rhiannon Nolan of Los Alamos National Laboratory for the purified EGFP and helpful discussions.

This work was conducted under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy and was supported in part by institutional Laboratory Directed Research and Development funds for “Pathogen Detection.”

Notes

Editor: J. T. Barbieri

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 28 December 1998.
    • Returned for modification 5 February 1999.
    • Accepted 1 March 1999.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Benson E. L.,
    2. Huynh P. D.,
    3. Finkelstein A.,
    4. Collier R. J.
    Identification of residues lining the anthrax protective antigen channel.Biochemistry37199839413948
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Blaustein R. O.,
    2. Koehler T. M.,
    3. Collier R. J.,
    4. Finkelstein A.
    Anthrax toxin: channel-forming activity of protective antigen in planar phospholipid-bilayers.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA86198922092213
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Boonham N.,
    2. Barker I.
    Strain-specific recombinant antibodies to potato-virus-Y potyvirus.J. Virol. Methods741998193199
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Brachman P. S.,
    2. Gold H.,
    3. Plotkin S. A.,
    4. Fekety F. R.,
    5. Werrin M.,
    6. Ingraham N. R.
    Field evaluation of a human anthrax vaccine.Am. J. Public Health521962632645
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bradbury A.,
    2. Persic L.,
    3. Werge T.,
    4. Cattaneo A.
    Use of living columns to select specific phage antibodies.Bio/Technology11199315651569
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dorsam H.,
    2. Rohrbach P.,
    3. Kurschner T.,
    4. Kipriyanov S.,
    5. Renner S.,
    6. Braunagel M.,
    7. Welschof M.,
    8. Little M.
    Antibodies to steroids from a small human naive IgM library.FEBS Lett.4141997713
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Duesbery N. S.,
    2. Webb C. P.,
    3. Leppla S. H.,
    4. Gordon V. M.,
    5. Klimpel K. R.,
    6. Copeland T. D.,
    7. Ahn N. G.,
    8. Oskarsson M. K.,
    9. Fukasawa K.,
    10. Paull K. D.,
    11. Vandewoude G. F.
    Proteolytic inactivation of MAP-kinase-kinase by anthrax lethal factor.Science2801998734737
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Escuyer V.,
    2. Collier R. J.
    Anthrax protective antigen interacts with a specific receptor on the surface of CHO-K1 cells.Infect. Immun.59199133813386
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Farchaus J. W.,
    2. Ribot W. J.,
    3. Jendrek S.,
    4. Little S. F.
    Fermentation, purification, and characterization of protective antigen from a recombinant, avirulent strain of Bacillus anthracis.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.641998982991
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Friedlander A. M.
    Macrophages are sensitive to anthrax lethal toxin through an acid-dependent process.J. Biol. Chem.261198671237126
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Gordon V. M.,
    2. Klimpel K. R.,
    3. Arora N.,
    4. Henderson M. A.,
    5. Leppla S. H.
    Proteolytic activation of bacterial toxins by eukaryotic cells is performed by furin and by additional cellular proteases.Infect. Immun.6319958287
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Gordon V. M.,
    2. Rehemtulla A.,
    3. Leppla S. H.
    A role for PACE4 in the proteolytic activation of anthrax toxin protective antigen.Infect. Immun.65199733703375
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Griffiths A. D.,
    2. Williams S. C.,
    3. Hartley O.,
    4. Tomlinson I. M.,
    5. Waterhouse P.,
    6. Crosby W. L.,
    7. Kontermann R. E.,
    8. Jones P. T.,
    9. Low N. M.,
    10. Allison T. J.,
    11. Prospero T. D.,
    12. Hoogenboom H. R.,
    13. Nissim A.,
    14. Cox J. P. L.,
    15. Harrison J. L.,
    16. Zaccolo M.,
    17. Gherardi E.,
    18. Winter G.
    Isolation of high-affinity human-antibodies directly from large synthetic repertoires.EMBO J.13199432453260
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hammond S. E.,
    2. Hanna P. C.
    Lethal factor active-site mutations affect catalytic activity in vitro.Infect. Immun.66199823742378
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Hanna P. C.,
    2. Acosta D.,
    3. Collier R. J.
    On the role of macrophages in anthrax.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9019931019810201
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Henderikx P.,
    2. Kandilogiannaki M.,
    3. Petrarca C.,
    4. Vonmensdorffpouilly S.,
    5. Hilgers J. H. M.,
    6. Krambovitis E.,
    7. Arends J. W.,
    8. Hoogenboom H. R.
    Human single-chain Fv antibodies to MUC1 core peptide selected from phage display libraries recognize unique epitopes and predominantly bind adenocarcinoma.Cancer Res.58199843244332
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Klimpel K. R.,
    2. Molloy S. S.,
    3. Thomas G.,
    4. Leppla S. H.
    Anthrax toxin protective antigen is activated by a cell-surface protease with the sequence specificity and catalytic properties of furin.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA8919921027710281
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Koehler T. M.,
    2. Collier R. J.
    Anthrax toxin protective antigen: low-pH-induced hydrophobicity and channel formation in liposomes.Mol. Microbiol.5199115011506
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Krebs B.,
    2. Griffin H.,
    3. Winter G.,
    4. Rosejohn S.
    Recombinant human single-chain Fv antibodies recognizing human interleukin-6: specific targeting of cytokine-secreting cells.J. Biol. Chem.273199828582865
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Leppla S. H.
    The anthrax toxin complex Sourcebook of bacterial protein toxins. Alouf J. H. F. J. E. 1991 277 302 Academic Press London, England
  21. 21.↵
    1. Leppla S. H.
    Anthrax toxin edema factor: a bacterial adenylate-cyclase that increases cyclic-AMP concentrations in eukaryotic cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA79198231623166
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Leppla S. H.
    Production and purification of anthrax toxin.Methods Enzymol.1651988103116
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Leppla S. H.,
    2. Friedlander A. M.,
    3. Cora E. M.
    Proteolytic activation of anthrax toxin bound to cellular receptors Bacterial protein toxins. Fehrenbach F., Alouf J. E., Falmagne P., Goebel W., Jelaszewics J., Jurgens D., Rappuoli R. 1988 111 112 Gustav Fischer Verlag Stuttgart, Germany
  24. 24.↵
    1. Little S. F.,
    2. Ivins B. E.,
    3. Fellows P. F.,
    4. Friedlander A. M.
    Passive protection by polyclonal antibodies against Bacillus anthracis infection in guinea pigs.Infect. Immun.65199751715175
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Little S. F.,
    2. Leppla S. H.,
    3. Burnett J. W.,
    4. Friedlander A. M.
    Structure-function analysis of Bacillus anthracis edema factor by using monoclonal-antibodies.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.1991994676682
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Little S. F.,
    2. Novak J. M.,
    3. Lowe J. R.,
    4. Leppla S. H.,
    5. Singh Y.,
    6. Klimpel K. R.,
    7. Lidgerding B. C.,
    8. Friedlander A. M.
    Characterization of lethal factor-binding and cell-receptor binding domains of protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis using monoclonal antibodies.Microbiology1421996707715
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Malmborg A. C.,
    2. Duenas M.,
    3. Ohlin M.,
    4. Soderlind E.,
    5. Borrebaeck C.
    Selection of binders from phage displayed antibody libraries using the BIAcore biosensor.J. Immunol. Methods19819965157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Marks J. D.,
    2. Hoogenboom H. R.,
    3. Bonnert T. P.,
    4. McCafferty J.,
    5. Griffiths A. D.,
    6. Winter G.
    Bypassing immunization: human-antibodies from V-gene libraries displayed on phage.J. Mol. Biol.2221991581597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    1. McCafferty J.
    Antibodies from phage display as genomics tools and therapeutic agents. 1998 IBC Antibody Engineering Conference Coronado, Calif
  30. 30.↵
    1. Milne J. C.,
    2. Furlong D.,
    3. Hanna P. C.,
    4. Wall J.,
    5. Collier R. J.
    Anthrax protective antigen forms ring-shaped oligomers during intoxication of mammalian cells.FASEB J.81994A1464
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    1. Milne J. C.,
    2. Furlong D.,
    3. Hanna P. C.,
    4. Wall J. S.,
    5. Collier R. J.
    Anthrax protective antigen forms oligomers during intoxication of mammalian cells.J. Biol. Chem.26919942060720612
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. 32.↵
    1. Neri D.,
    2. Carnemolla B.,
    3. Nissim A.,
    4. Leprini A.,
    5. Querze G.,
    6. Balza E.,
    7. Pini A.,
    8. Tarli L.,
    9. Halin C.,
    10. Neri P.,
    11. Zardi L.,
    12. Winter G.
    Targeting by affinity-matured recombinant antibody fragments of an angiogenesis associated fibronectin isoform.Nat. Biotechnol.15199712711275
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Novak J. M.,
    2. Stein M. P.,
    3. Little S. F.,
    4. Leppla S. H.,
    5. Friedlander A. M.
    Functional characterization of protease-treated Bacillus anthracis protective antigen.J. Biol. Chem.26719921718617193
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Osbourn J. K.,
    2. Field A.,
    3. Wilton J.,
    4. Derbyshire E.,
    5. Earnshaw J. C.,
    6. Jones P. T.,
    7. Allen D.,
    8. McCafferty J.
    Generation of a panel of related human scFv antibodies with high affinities for human CEA.Immunotechnology21996181196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    1. Perelson A. S.,
    2. Oster G. F.
    Theoretical studies of clonal selection: minimal antibody repertoire size and reliability of self-non-self discrimination.J. Theor. Biol.811979645670
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Petosa C.,
    2. Collier R. J.,
    3. Klimpel K. R.,
    4. Leppla S. H.,
    5. Liddington R. C.
    Crystal-structure of the anthrax toxin protective antigen.Nature3851997833838
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Pezard C.,
    2. Berche P.,
    3. Mock M.
    Contribution of individual toxin components to virulence of Bacillus anthracis.Infect. Immun.59199134723477
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Puziss M.,
    2. Manning L. C.,
    3. Lynch L. W.,
    4. Barclay E.,
    5. Abelow I.,
    6. Wright G. G.
    Large-scale production of protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis anaerobic cultures.Appl. Microbiol.111963330334
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    1. Quinn C. P.,
    2. Shone C. C.,
    3. Turnbull P. C. B.,
    4. Melling J.
    Purification of anthrax-toxin components by high-performance anion-exchange, gel-filtration and hydrophobic-interaction chromatography.Biochem. J.2521988753758
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. Robertson D.,
    2. Bragg T.,
    3. Simpson S.,
    4. Kaspar R.,
    5. Xie W.,
    6. Tippetts M.
    Mapping and characterization of the Bacillus anthracis plasmids pXO1 and pXO2.Salisbury Med. Bull.68Special Suppl.19905558
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    1. Schier R.,
    2. Bye J.,
    3. Apell G.,
    4. McCall A.,
    5. Adams G. P.,
    6. Malmqvist M.,
    7. Weiner L. M.,
    8. Marks J. D.
    Isolation of high-affinity monomeric human anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv using affinity-driven selection.J. Mol. Biol.25519962843
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    1. Schier R.,
    2. Marks J. D.,
    3. Wolf E. J.,
    4. Apell G.,
    5. Wong C.,
    6. McCartney J. E.,
    7. Bookman M. A.,
    8. Huston J. S.,
    9. Houston L. L.,
    10. Weiner L. M.,
    11. Adams G. P.
    In vitro and in vivo characterization of a human anti-c-erbB-2 single-chain Fv isolated from a filamentous phage antibody library.Immunotechnology119957381
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Sheets M. D.,
    2. Amersdorfer P.,
    3. Finnern R.,
    4. Sargent P.,
    5. Lindqvist E.,
    6. Schier R.,
    7. Hemingsen G.,
    8. Wong C.,
    9. Gerhart J. C.,
    10. Marks J. D.
    Efficient construction of a large non-immune phage antibody library: the production of high-affinity human single-chain antibodies to protein antigens.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95199861576162
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Singh Y.,
    2. Chaudhary V. K.,
    3. Leppla S. H.
    A deleted variant of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen is non-toxic and blocks anthrax toxin action in vivo.J. Biol. Chem.26419891910319107
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Singh Y.,
    2. Ivins B. E.,
    3. Leppla S. H.
    Study of immunization against anthrax with the purified recombinant protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis.Infect. Immun.66199834473448
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Singh Y.,
    2. Klimpel K. R.,
    3. Quinn C. P.,
    4. Chaudhary V. K.,
    5. Leppla S. H.
    The carboxyl-terminal end of protective antigen is required for receptor-binding and anthrax toxin activity.J. Biol. Chem.26619911549315497
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    1. Takekoshi M.,
    2. Maeda F.,
    3. Tachibana H.,
    4. Inoko H.,
    5. Kato S.,
    6. Takakura I.,
    7. Kenjyo T.,
    8. Hiraga S.,
    9. Ogawa Y.,
    10. Horiki T.,
    11. Ihara S.
    Human monoclonal anti-HCMV neutralizing antibody from phage display libraries.J. Virol. Methods7419988998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    1. Tordsson J.,
    2. Abrahmsen L.,
    3. Kalland T.,
    4. Ljung C.,
    5. Ingvar C.,
    6. Brodin T.
    Efficient selection of scFv antibody phage by adsorption to in situ expressed antigens in tissue-sections.J. Immunol. Methods21019971123
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. van Ewijk W.,
    2. de Kruif J.,
    3. Germeraad W. T. V.,
    4. Berendes P.,
    5. Ropke C.,
    6. Platenburg P. P.,
    7. Logtenberg T.
    Subtractive isolation of phage displayed single-chain antibodies to thymic stromal cells by using intact thymic fragments.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94199739033908
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Vaughan T. J.,
    2. Williams A. J.,
    3. Pritchard K.,
    4. Osbourn J. K.,
    5. Pope A. R.,
    6. Earnshaw J. C.,
    7. McCafferty J.,
    8. Hodits R. A.,
    9. Wilton J.,
    10. Johnson K. S.
    Human antibodies with subnanomolar affinities isolated from a large nonimmunized phage display library.Nat. Biotechnol.141996309314
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  51. 51.↵
    1. Vitale G.,
    2. Pellizzari R.,
    3. Recchi C.,
    4. Napolitani G.,
    5. Mock M.,
    6. Montecucco C.
    Anthrax lethal factor cleaves the N-terminus of MAP-K-Ks and induces tyrosine/threonine phosphorylation of MAP-Ks in cultured macrophages.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.2481998706711
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    1. Wang X. M.,
    2. Wattiez R.,
    3. Mock M.,
    4. Falmagne P.,
    5. Ruysschaert J. M.,
    6. Cabiaux V.
    Structure and interaction of PA63 and EF (edema toxin) of Bacillus anthracis with lipid-membrane.Biochemistry3619971490614913
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. 53.↵
    1. Winter G.,
    2. Griffiths A. D.,
    3. Hawkins R. E.,
    4. Hoogenboom H. R.
    Making antibodies by phage display technology.Annu. Rev. Immunol.121994433455
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Witte L.,
    2. Hicklin D. J.,
    3. Zhu Z. P.,
    4. Pytowski B.,
    5. Kotanides H.,
    6. Rockwell P.,
    7. Bohlen P.
    Monoclonal-antibodies targeting the vEGF receptor-2 (Flk1/Kdr) as an anti-angiogenic therapeutic strategy.Cancer Metastasis Rev.171998155161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Disruption of Anthrax Toxin Binding with the Use of Human Antibodies and Competitive Inhibitors
Nick M. Cirino, Daniele Sblattero, David Allen, Scott R. Peterson, James D. Marks, Paul J. Jackson, Andrew Bradbury, Bruce E. Lehnert
Infection and Immunity Jun 1999, 67 (6) 2957-2963; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.6.2957-2963.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Disruption of Anthrax Toxin Binding with the Use of Human Antibodies and Competitive Inhibitors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Disruption of Anthrax Toxin Binding with the Use of Human Antibodies and Competitive Inhibitors
Nick M. Cirino, Daniele Sblattero, David Allen, Scott R. Peterson, James D. Marks, Paul J. Jackson, Andrew Bradbury, Bruce E. Lehnert
Infection and Immunity Jun 1999, 67 (6) 2957-2963; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.6.2957-2963.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibodies, Bacterial
Antigens, Bacterial
bacterial toxins
Immunoglobulin Fragments

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522