Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Fungal and Parasitic Infections

Evidence of Thymus-Independent Local and Systemic Antibody Responses to Cryptosporidium parvum Infection in Nude Mice

Andrew A. Adjei, Janet T. Jones, Michael W. Riggs, F. Javier Enriquez
Andrew A. Adjei
Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janet T. Jones
Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael W. Riggs
Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Javier Enriquez
Department of Veterinary Science and Microbiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.8.3947-3951.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Differences in susceptibility to persistent cryptosporidial infection between two strains of adult athymic nude mice prompted us to investigate the immune mechanism(s) that may control resistance to infection in these T-cell-deficient mice. We studied fecal oocyst shedding, serum and fecal parasite-specific antibody responses, and fecal immunoglobulin levels in athymic C57BL/6J nude and athymic BALB/cJ nude mice following oral inoculation with Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts at 8 to 9 weeks of age. C57BL/6J nude mice had significantly higher fecal parasite-specific immunoglobulin A (IgA) (days 27, 31, 35, and 42 postinoculation) and IgM (days 10, 17, 24, 28, 31, 38, 42, and 48 postinoculation) levels than BALB/cJ nude mice (P < 0.05) and significantly higher serum parasite-specific IgA levels at 63 days postinoculation (P < 0.03). Moreover, C57BL/6J nude mice shed significantly fewer C. parvum oocysts than BALB/cJ nude mice from days 52 to 63 postinoculation (P < 0.05). In contrast, BALB/cJ nude mice had higher levels of non-parasite-specific IgA (days 38 to 63 postinoculation) and IgM (days 24, 35, 38, and 52 postinoculation) than C57BL/6J nude mice in feces (P < 0.05). These data suggest that parasite-specific fecal antibodies may be associated with resistance to C. parvum in C57BL/6J nude mice.

During the past two decades,Cryptosporidium parvum has gained recognition as an important enteropathogen of mammals, including humans (17, 18, 48). In immunocompetent hosts, C. parvum generally causes a self-limited diarrheal illness. However, in immunocompromised hosts, C. parvum may cause a life-threatening, prolonged cholera-like illness (12, 31, 37). Numerous attempts to treat cryptosporidiosis in both humans and animals have met with limited success (8, 41). The absence of consistently effective anticryptosporidial chemotherapeutic agents exacerbates the consequences of this disease. Moreover, the lack of a suitable immunocompetent adult laboratory model of infection has hindered our understanding of functional immune responses to this parasite.

The discovery that mice homozygous for the nude mutation (nu/nu, T-cell deficient) and SCID mice (which lack both T and B cells) develop persistent C. parvum infection led to their use as models for the study of disease pathogenesis and evaluation of potential anticryptosporidial agents (24, 32, 49). Evidence from the above studies and others (2, 10, 36, 50, 51) indicates that the control of cryptosporidial infection in mice involves CD4+ cells and T-cell receptor (TCR) αβ CD4+ cells. Gamma interferon (IFN-γ) is also important in the control of parasite development, as treatment of mice with anti-IFN-γ antibodies increases susceptibility to infection (11, 47, 50). Serum and local parasite-specific antibodies have been detected following infection, but their contribution to resistance to cryptosporidiosis remains unclear (7, 44). Several investigators have examined the kinetics of C. parvum-specific serum and fecal antibody responses associated with oocyst shedding in infected mice, lambs, and calves. While some investigators have found an association between declining oocyst shedding and rising titers of specific immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgM (25, 38), others have provided no evidence for such an association (44, 46).

Published studies on cryptosporidiosis in athymic nude mice have used primarily the BALB/cJ strain; to our knowledge, little work has been done with athymic nude mice of other inbred strains (24, 32). In our laboratory, inoculation of 8-week-old athymic C57BL/6J nude mice with C. parvum oocysts resulted in fecal oocyst shedding significantly lower than that observed in athymic BALB/cJ nude mice, suggesting non-thymus-dependent strain differences in susceptibility to infection. Recently, other investigators have noted differences in susceptibility to cryptosporidial infection in immunodeficient mice (13, 33, 47). These studies suggest that genetic differences, the presence or absence of certain cytokines (such as IFN-γ and interleukin-4 [IL-4]), and other host factors yet unidentified may influence the outcome of cryptosporidial infection. While cell-mediated immunity is required for control of cryptosporidiosis, mucosally delivered neutralizing antibodies may be involved in resistance to and recovery from infection (38, 40). We herein examine the relationships between local antibody (IgA and IgM) responses and oocyst shedding in adult C57BL/6J nude and BALB/cJ nude mice. Our results indicate that parasite-specific serum (IgA) and fecal (IgA and IgM) antibodies may be associated with resistance to C. parvum infection in C57BL/6J nude mice. In addition to providing insight into the role of anti-C. parvum serum and fecal antibody responses, these two mouse strains may serve as models to allow evaluation of thymus-independent responses to C. parvum.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals.Female C57BL/6J nude and BALB/cJ nude mice (23 to 26 g), ages 8 to 9 weeks, were obtained from Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, Maine). Mice were housed in microisolator cages in high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA)-filtered laminar flow racks and allowed to acclimate for 1-week prior to oocyst challenge. All manipulations were done in a HEPA-filtered hood. Mice received sterilized normal mouse diet (Tekland, Harlan, Md.) containing 18% (wt/wt) protein and 6% (wt/wt) fat as well as sterilized water throughout the experimental period (63 days).

C. parvum oocyst inoculation.Purified C. parvum oocysts (IOWA isolate) were obtained from Pleasant Hill Farms (Mount Pleasant, Idaho). Oocysts were stored at 4°C in 2.5% (wt/vol) potassium dichromate for up to 2 weeks prior to use. Before mice were inoculated, oocyst preparations were treated with 1.75% (wt/vol) sodium hypochlorite (1 min, 22 to 23°C) and then washed with 0.025 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2). Each mouse was inoculated intragastrically with 106 oocysts in 100 μl of PBS, using an 18-gauge gavage needle (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, N.J.).

Quantification of oocysts in feces.Fecal pellets from each mouse in each group were collected twice weekly from days 3 to 63 postinoculation (p.i.) to monitor oocyst shedding by immunofluorescence assay. Briefly, four fecal pellets were collected from each mouse into individual microcentrifuge tubes and suspended in 1.5 ml of PBS overnight at 4°C. The fecal pellets were then vortex homogenized and centrifuged (1,500 × g, 4°C, 10 min), after which the supernatant fractions were collected and kept at −80°C prior to specific IgA or IgM antibody measurements. Ethyl acetate (300 μl) was then added to the fecal pellets in each tube; the feces were vortexed (60 s) and then centrifuged (1,500 × g, 10 min, 4°C) to concentrate oocysts. The supernatants were then aspirated, and the oocyst-containing sediments were resuspended in 300 μl of PBS/sample. Ten microliters of each suspension was then placed in individual wells of multiwell glass slides previously treated with poly-l-lysine (0.01% [vol/vol]; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.). Slides were heat fixed and processed for immunofluorescence assay using oocyst-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb) OW50 conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate as instructed by the manufacturer (Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, Ohio). Oocysts in each sample were counted in an Olympus (La Palma, Calif.) epifluorescence microscope (400× objective). Thirty arbitrarily selected fields in each well were examined.

Preparation of CpA. C. parvum oocyst antigen (CpA) was prepared by using a modification of a previously described protocol (35). Briefly, oocysts (7 × 108) were washed with PBS, centrifuged (1,500 × g, 5 min, 4°C), resuspended in 1.75% (wt/vol) sodium hypochlorite for 1 min, centrifuged (1,500 × g, 5 min, 4°C), and washed three times (4°C) with PBS. They were then resuspended in 2 ml of sterile deionized water containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma) and disrupted by ultrasonication (10 min, 4°C) followed by freezing and thawing five times. The lysate was then centrifuged (1,500 × g, 10 min, 4°C) to remove insoluble material; the supernatant was dialyzed (molecular weight exclusion limit, 6,000 to 8,000) against PBS (12 h, 4°C) and then stored at −80°C. Protein content was determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, Ill.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Fecal and serum antibody determination.To determine the local antibody response, four fecal pellets per mouse (collected from days 3 to 63 p.i. from both strains of mice) were suspended in 1.5 ml of PBS, vortex homogenized, and centrifuged (1,500 × g, 4°C, 10 min) to remove insoluble material. The antibody-containing supernatants were then collected and kept at −80°C prior to IgA and IgM determination by an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Each mouse was also bled from the retro-orbital plexus on days 0, 3, 21, and 63 p.i. Serum was separated and stored at −80°C prior to IgA, IgG, and IgM determination by ELISA.

To measure C. parvum-specific antibody responses by ELISA, Falcon Pro-Bind (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, Calif.) ELISA plates were coated overnight (12 h, 4°C) with 50 μl of CpA (2 μg/ml in 0.1 M carbonate buffer [pH 9.6]). The plates were then washed thrice (5 min per wash) with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBS-T) and twice with PBS and then blocked (37°C, 1 h) with 100 μl of 1% (wt/vol) nonfat milk in PBS; 50 μl of fecal supernatant (described above) or serum (for IgA, 1:20 dilution; for IgG and IgM, 1:100 dilution in 1% nonfat milk–PBS solution) from individual mice was then added in triplicate to wells and incubated (12 h, 4°C). Controls included various concentrations of anti-C. parvum MAbs (IgA, 4D4 G9H4 [16]; IgM, OW50 [43]; IgG1, 3F7-F11 [42]). After washing, 50 μl of horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgA, IgG, and IgM (1:1,000 dilution; Sigma) was added to each well and incubated (37°C, 2 h). After additional washing, ABTS [2,2′-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazolinesulfonic acid)]-H2O2 (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, Md.) was added to each well and incubated (22 to 23°C, 30 min), after which optical densities (ODs) were measured at 450 nm with an ELISA Reader (Dynatech Laboratories Inc., Chantilly, Va.). Concentrations of parasite-specific serum IgA, IgG, and IgM in each sample were calculated from positive controls determined on each plate. Total fecal IgA or IgM levels were measured by sandwich ELISA using various concentrations of class-specific antibodies as controls. Capturing MAbs (Kirkegaard & Perry) included rat anti-mouse IgA (catalog no. 01-18-01) and rat anti-mouse IgM (catalog no. 01-18-09). Falcon Pro-Bind (Becton Dickinson) ELISA plates were coated with each capture antibody (1 μg/ml in carbonate buffer [pH 9.6]; 12 h at 4°C), washed thrice with PBS-T and twice with PBS as described above, and blocked (1% [wt/vol] nonfat milk–PBS solution; 37°C, 1 h). Fecal supernatants and standards were then added in triplicate to the wells. Positive controls used as standards consisted of murine polyclonal antibodies derived from mouse myeloma cells (IgA, MOPC-315; IgM, MOPC-104E; each at 0.0156 to 1.0 μg/ml; Sigma) and were included independently in each ELISA plate. Plates were incubated (12 h, 4°C), washed as described above, and incubated (37°C, 2 h) with 50 μl of horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgA or IgM (1:1,000 dilution; Kirkegaard & Perry). After additional washing, ABTS-H2O2 substrate (Kirkegaard & Perry) was added to each well and incubated (22 to 23°C, 30 min). Following incubation, ODs were measured at 450 nm. The immunoglobulin concentrations in each sample were calculated from immunoglobulin standard curves determined on each plate.

Statistical analysis.Parasite-specific fecal antibody and total fecal immunoglobulin values for individual mice of each strain were averaged, and differences between the means were analyzed for significant differences by a random-effects repeated-measures model using Stata Software (Computer Resource Center, Santa Monica, Calif.). Differences in the mean serum anti-C. parvum IgA and IgM antibody levels for each strain were analyzed for significant differences by using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Mean fecal oocyst shedding results (days 3 to 63 p.i. from each strain) were analyzed for significant differences by one-tail Student’st test.

RESULTS

Oocyst shedding.Oocyst shedding was undetectable in both strains of mice from days 3 to 24 p.i. (Fig.1). Variable, low-level oocyst shedding was noted in BALB/cJ nude mice from days 28 to 48 p.i. The intensity of oocyst shedding in BALB/cJ nude mice increased at days 52, 56, and 59 and again at day 63 p.i. and was significantly higher than C57BL/6J nude mice oocyst shedding (P < 0.05). Oocyst shedding in C57BL/6J nude mice was generally below detectable levels before day 60 p.i., at which time transient oocyst shedding was observed. The differential responses between C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ nude mice described herein were observed in replicate experiments.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Fecal oocyst shedding by C. parvum-inoculated athymic C57BL/6J (n = 6) and BALB/cJ (n = 5) nude mice. ∗, values are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Fecal Cryptosporidium-specific antibody.Although there was considerable variability both between days and between individuals within each group, on days 27, 31, 35, and 42 p.i., C57BL/6J nude mice had higher levels of anti-C. parvum IgA than BALB/cJ nude mice (P < 0.05) (Fig.2A). The titer of anti-C. parvum fecal IgM was higher in C57BL/6J nude mice than in BALB/cJ nude mice on days 10, 17, 24, 28, 31, 38, 42, and 48 p.i. (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Kinetics of fecal C. parvum-specific IgA (A) and IgM (B) antibody responses in C. parvum-inoculated athymic C57BL/6J (n = 6) and BALB/cJ (n = 5) nude mice measured by ELISA. ∗, values are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Fecal immunoglobulin levels.The kinetics of total fecal IgA and IgM levels (Fig. 3) differed from that of fecal C. parvum-specific antibody responses (Fig.2). Total fecal IgA in BALB/cJ nude mice remained at a low level from day 0 until day 31 p.i. On day 35 p.i., fecal IgA in BALB/cJ nude mice increased sharply and remained significantly higher (days 38 to 63 p.i.) than in C57BL/6J nude mice (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3A). Conversely, total fecal IgA in C57BL/6J nude mice remained at a moderate level from days 0 to 35 p.i. (Fig. 3A). On days 17, 21, 24, 28, and 31 p.i., fecal IgA levels in C57BL/6J nude mice were significantly higher than in BALB/cJ nude mice (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3A). Levels of fecal IgA in C57BL/6J nude mice dropped and remained significantly lower than those in BALB/c mice from days 42 to 63 p.i. (P < 0.001). The total fecal IgM in C57BL/6J nude mice changed little over the course of the experiment (Fig. 3B). However, in BALB/cJ nude mice, fecal IgM increased and was significantly higher than in C57BL/6J nude mice on days 24, 35, 38, and 52 p.i. (P < 0.05).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Concentration of total fecal IgA (A) and IgM (B) antibody responses in C. parvum-inoculated athymic C57BL/6J (n = 6) and BALB/cJ (n = 5) nude mice measured by ELISA. ∗, values are significantly different (P < 0.05).

Serum Cryptosporidium-specific IgA, IgG, and IgM levels.On days 0, 3, and 21 p.i., anti-C. parvumserum IgA was not detected in either C57BL/6J nude mice or BALB/cJ nude mice (data not shown). On day 63 p.i., four of the five BALB/cJ nude mice had no detectable anti-C. parvum serum IgA (Fig.4). Anti-C. parvum serum IgA in the one BALB/cJ nude mouse that responded was 44.1 μg/ml (Fig. 4). In contrast, five of the six C57BL/6J nude mice showed a high level of anti-C. parvum serum IgA ranging from 208 to 470 μg/ml (Fig. 4). One C57BL/6J nude mouse had no detectable anti-C. parvum serum IgA. The mean serum anti-C. parvum IgA (BALB/cJ, 8.8 μg/ml; C57BL/6J, 310 μg/ml) on day 63 p.i. was significantly different (P < 0.05) between the two strains (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Concentration of serum anti-C. parvum IgA antibody on day 63 p.i. in athymic C57BL/6J (n = 6) and BALB/cJ (n = 5) nude mice measured by ELISA. Medians (——; BALB/cJ, 8.82 μg/ml; C57BL/6J, 310 μg/ml) are shown. Anti-C. parvum IgA antibodies in C57BL/6J nude mice were significantly higher than in BALB/cJ nude mice (P < 0.03).

Anti-C. parvum serum IgG levels at 3, 21, and 63 days p.i. were highly variable between individual animals in both mouse strains. There were no significant differences in serum anti-C. parvum IgG levels between BALB/cJ nude mice (day 3 p.i., 16.71 ± 10.43; day 21 p.i., 37.01 ± 21.58; day 63 p.i., 9.53 ± 5.19) and C57BL/6J nude mice (day 3 p.i., 8.841 ± 5.68; day 21 p.i., 30.22 ± 12.15; day 63 p.i., 40.02 ± 33.54) at any time point studied (P > 0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences in serum anti-C. parvum IgM levels between BALB/cJ nude mice (day 3 p.i., 5.00 ± 1.58; day 21 p.i., 6.02 ± 0.72; day 63 p.i., 2.24 ± 0.52) and C57BL/6J nude mice (day 3 p.i., 3.841 ± 2.88; day 21 p.i., 9.65 ± 4.82; day 63 p.i., 7.40 ± 3.37) at any time point studied (P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Athymic BALB/cJ nude mice have been used extensively as models ofC. parvum infection to investigate the role of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses (9, 24, 32, 41). However, to our knowledge, no work on the immune response to C. parvumhas been done with mice carrying the nu/nu mutation on other strain backgrounds. Resistance to C. parvum requires both cellular (primarily) and humoral responses (27, 41, 54). These responses have been studied systemically in mice, humans, and domestic animals. However, the role of intestinal mucosal immune responses has not been thoroughly explored in athymic nude mice. During our studies of mucosal immune responses, we observed that C57BL/6J nude mice, despite the absence of functional thymus-dependent responses, develop only low-grade C. parvum infection, while BALB/cJ nude mice exhibited greater infection. Specifically, BALB/cJ nude mice shed significantly more oocysts in feces than C57BL/6J nude mice. A comparison of antibody responses between BALB/cJ nude mice and C57BL/6J nude mice revealed marked differences. C. parvum-inoculated BALB/cJ nude mice had significantly lower production of fecal C. parvum-specific IgA (days 27, 31, 35, and 42 p.i.) and IgM (days 10, 17, 24, 28, 31, 38, 42, and 48 p.i.) than C57BL/6J nude mice, and only one of five BALB/cJ nude mice produced anti-C. parvum serum IgA. In contrast, BALB/cJ nude mice had significantly more total IgA (days 38 to 63 p.i.) and IgM (days 24, 35, 38, 48, and 52 p.i.) in feces than C57BL/6J nude mice, suggesting that in BALB/cJ nude mice either secretory responses were not completely impaired, there was increased leakage via increased intestinal permeability, or parasite-specific responses were suppressed or not appropriately expressed. Our results suggest that intestinal mucosal immune responses temporally associated with fecal parasite-specific antibodies may accompany resistance to C. parvum infection in C57BL/6J nude mice. Moreover, the results further suggest that differences in the two athymic nude mouse strains examined can have a significant effect on susceptibility to C. parvum infection even though both strains are T-cell deficient. Recent reports have demonstrated a relationship between oocyst shedding and local IgA immune responses in C. parvum-infected lambs, calves, and mice (25, 38, 40, 46). In the experiments reported here, association of parasite-specific fecal IgA and oocyst shedding is also observed in C57BL/6J nude mice.

Athymic nude mice lack functional systemic T lymphocytes (34), have poorly developed or absent Peyer’s patch germinal centers, where progenitors of IgA plasma cells reside (21, 29). These defects are corrected by adoptive reconstitution with T cells (22). In addition, production of IgA antibodies in mice requires the cooperation of cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IFN-γ, and transforming growth factor β, which have been found at low levels in athymic mice (14, 29, 30).

Recently, functional T lymphocytes at the mucosal level have been detected in nude mice and identified as small intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL), which are predominantly TCR γδ IEL (23, 26, 52, 53). These γδ T cells have been shown to promote mucosal IgA immune responses and have also been shown to produce an array of Th1-type (e.g., IFN-γ), and Th2-type (e.g., IL-4, IL-5, and IL-10) cytokines, as well as transforming growth factor β and tumor necrosis factor alpha (3-6, 19, 30, 45). We have found significantly higher numbers of TCR αβ and γδ IEL T cells in the small intestines of C. parvum-inoculated C57BL/6J nude mice infected with C. parvum than in those of BALB/cJ nude mice (1). The reasons for these differences between the two strains of mice are difficult to explain. However, the putative lack of mature or functional γδ IEL in athymic BALB/cJ mice may have contributed to the low fecal antibody responses observed. Although the present study does not address whether γδ IEL in C57BL/6J nude mice are responsible for the lower oocyst shedding and increased serum and fecal parasite-specific antibody levels observed, it is possible that in the absence of systemic T cells, γδ IEL had an effect on either IgA+ B-cell differentiation, induction of IgA switch, or other functional mucosal responses. Alternatively, it is possible that γδ IEL in C57BL/6J nude mice had influenced αβ T cells to up-regulate parasite-specific IgA and IgM mucosal responses (15, 20, 39). Studies are now in progress in our laboratory to explore these possibilities, and to define the factors influencing development of mucosal and systemic antibodies in athymic C57BL/6J nude mice and their potential involvement in the control of C. parvum infection.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The excellent technical assistance of Kimberly M. Smith, Brian Curran, and Vivian Mack is greatly appreciated. We also thank Kent Griffith of the Arizona Prevention Center for help with statistical analyses.

This work was supported by Public Health Service grant AI 39203 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md.

Notes

Editor: T. R. Kozel

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 19 February 1999.
    • Returned for modification 19 April 1999.
    • Accepted 6 May 1999.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Adjei, A. A., J. T. Jones, and F. J. Enriquez. Unpublished observations.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Aguirre S. H.,
    2. Mason P. H.,
    3. Perryman L. E.
    Susceptibility of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I- and MHC class II-deficient mice to Cryptosporidium parvum infection.Infect. Immun.621994697699
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Barrett T. A.,
    2. Gajewski T. F.,
    3. Danielpour D.,
    4. Chang E. B.,
    5. Beagley K. W.,
    6. Bluestone J. A.
    Differential function of intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte subsets.J. Immunol.149199211241130
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. 4.↵
    1. Beagley K. W.,
    2. Eldridge J. H.,
    3. Kiyono H.,
    4. Everson M. P.,
    5. Koopman W. J.,
    6. Honjo T.,
    7. McGhee J. R.
    Recombinant murine IL-5 induces high rate of IgA synthesis in cycling IgA positive Peyer’s patch B cells.J. Immunol.141198820352042
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Beagley K. W.,
    2. Eldridge J. H.,
    3. Lee F.,
    4. Kiyono H.,
    5. Everson M. P.,
    6. Koopman W. J.,
    7. Hirano T.,
    8. Kishimoto T.,
    9. McGhee J. R.
    Interleukins and IgA synthesis: human and murine interleukin 6 induce high rate immunoglobulins secretion in IgA committed B cells.J. Exp. Med.169198921332148
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Beagley K. W.,
    2. Fujihashi K.,
    3. Lagoo A. S.,
    4. Lagoo-Deenadaylan S.,
    5. Back C. A.,
    6. Murray A. M.,
    7. Sharmanov A. T.,
    8. Yamamoto M.,
    9. McGhee J. R.,
    10. Elson C. O.,
    11. Kiyono H.
    Differences in intraepithelial lymphocytes T cell subsets isolated from murine small versus large intestine.J. Immunol.154199556115619
    OpenUrlAbstract
  7. 7.↵
    1. Benhamou Y.,
    2. Kapel N.,
    3. Hoang C.,
    4. Matta H.,
    5. Meillet D.,
    6. Magne D.,
    7. Gentilini M.,
    8. Opolon P.,
    9. Gobert J. G.
    Inefficacy of intestinal secretory immune response to Cryptosporidium in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.Gastroenterology1081995627635
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Blagburn B. L.,
    2. Soave R.
    Prophylaxis and chemotherapy: human and animal Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis. Fayer R. 1997 111 128 CRC Press, Inc. New York, N.Y
  9. 9.↵
    1. Bjorneby J. M.,
    2. Hunsaker B. D.,
    3. Riggs M. W.,
    4. Perryman L. E.
    Monoclonal antibody immunotherapy in nude mice persistently infected with Cryptosporidium parvum.Infect. Immun.59199111721176
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chen W.,
    2. Harp J. A.,
    3. Harmsen A. G.
    Requirements for CD4+ cells and gamma interferon in resolution of established Cryptosporidium parvum infection in mice.Infect. Immun.61199339283932
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Chen W.,
    2. Harp J. A.,
    3. Harmsen A. G.,
    4. Havell E. A.
    Gamma interferon functions in resistance to Cryptosporidium parvum infection in severe combined immunodeficient mice.Infect. Immun.61199335483551
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Current W. L.,
    2. Bick P. H.
    Immunology of Cryptosporidium.Pathol. Immunopathol.81989141160
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.↵
    1. Davami M. H.,
    2. Bancroft G. J.,
    3. McDonald V.
    Cryptosporidium infection in major histocompatibility complex congeneic strains of mice: variation in susceptibility and the role of T-cell cytokine response.Parasitol. Res.831997257263
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Defrance T.,
    2. Vanberliet B.,
    3. Bierre F.,
    4. Durand I.,
    5. Rousset F.,
    6. Banchereau J.
    Interleukin 10 and transforming growth factor beta co-operate to induce CD40 activated native human B cells to secrete IgA.J. Exp. Med.1751992621627
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Dieli F.,
    2. Asherson G. L.,
    3. Sireci G.
    γδ T cells involved in contact sensitivity preferentially rearrange V γ3 region and require interleukin 7.Eur. J. Immunol.271997206214
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Enriquez F. J.,
    2. Riggs M. W.
    IgA monoclonal antibodies against P23 in control of Cryptosporidium parvum infection.Infect. Immun.66199844694473
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Fayer R.,
    2. Speer C. A.,
    3. Dubey J. P.
    The general biology of Cryptosporidium Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis. Fayer R. 1997 1 42 CRC Press, Inc. New York, N.Y
  18. 18.↵
    1. Fayer R.,
    2. Ungar B. L. P.
    Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis.Microbiol. Rev.501988458483
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.↵
    1. Fujihashi K.,
    2. Mcghee J. R.,
    3. Koweon M. N.,
    4. Cooper M. D.,
    5. Tonegawa S.,
    6. Takahashi I.,
    7. Hiroi T.,
    8. Mestecky J.,
    9. Kiyono H.
    γδ T cell deficient mice have impaired mucosal IgA responses.J. Exp. Med.183199619291935
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Fujihashi K.,
    2. Kiyono H.,
    3. Archer W. K.
    Immunoregulatory function of CD3+, CD4−, and CD8− transfer cells; γδ T cell receptor-positive T cells from nude mice abrogate oral tolerance.J. Immunol.143198934153420
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. 21.↵
    1. Guy-Grand D.,
    2. Griscelli C.,
    3. Vassali P.
    The gut-associated lymphoid system: nature and properties of the large dividing cells.Eur. J. Immunol.41974435443
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    1. Guy-Grand D.,
    2. Griscelli C.,
    3. Vassali P.
    Peyer’s patches, gut IgA plasma cells and thymic function: study in nude mice bearing thymic grafts.J. Immunol.1151975361364
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Guy-Grand D.,
    2. Cerf-Bensussan N.,
    3. Malissen B.,
    4. Malassis-Seris M.,
    5. Briottet C.,
    6. Vassalli P.
    Two gut intraepithelial CD8+ lymphocyte populations with different T cell receptors: a role for gut epithelium in T cell differentiation.J. Exp. Med.1731991471481
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Heine J.,
    2. Moon H. W.,
    3. Woodmansee D. B.
    Persistent Cryptosporidium infection in congenitally athymic (nude) mice.Infect. Immun.431984856859
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Hill, B. D., D. A. Blewett, A. M., and S. Wright. 1990. Analysis of the kinetics, isotype and serum specificity of serum and coproantibody in lambs infected withCryptosporidium parvum. Res. Vet. Sci. 48:76–81.
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hung T.,
    2. Bevan M. J.
    Specificity of cytotoxic T cells from athymic nude mice.J. Exp. Med.1761980187191
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. McDonald V.,
    2. Bancroft G. J.
    Mechanisms of innate and acquired resistance to Cryptosporidium parvum infection in SCID mice.Parasite Immunol.161994315320
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.
    1. McDonald V.,
    2. Deer V. R.,
    3. Uni S.,
    4. Iseki M.,
    5. Bancroft G. J.
    Immune responses to C. muris and C. parvum in adult immunocompetent and immunocompromised (nude and SCID) mice.Infect. Immun.60199233253331
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. McGhee J. R.,
    2. Mestecky J.,
    3. Elson C. O.,
    4. Kiyono H.
    Regulation of IgA synthesis and immune responses by T cells and interleukins.J. Clin. Immunol.91989175199
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. McGhee J. R.,
    2. Kiyono H.
    The mucosal immune system Fundamental immunology. Paul W. E. 1999 909 945 Lippincott-Raven Publishers New York, N.Y
  31. 31.↵
    1. McGowan L.,
    2. Hawkins A. S.,
    3. Walker I. V. D.
    The natural history of cryptosporidial diarrhea in HIV infected patients.AIDS71993349354
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Mead J. R.,
    2. Arrowood M. J.,
    3. Sidwell R. W.,
    4. Healey M. C.
    Chronic Cryptosporidium parvum infections in congenitally immunodeficient SCID and nude mice.J. Infect. Dis.163199112971304
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    1. Mead J. R.,
    2. You X.
    Susceptibility differences to Cryptosporidium parvum infections in 2 strains of gamma interferon knockout mice.J. Parasitol.84199810451048
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    1. Milich D. R.,
    2. Gershwin M. E.
    T cell differentiation and the congenitally athymic (nude) mouse.Dev. Comp. Immunol.11977289298
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Moss D. M.,
    2. Lammie P. J.
    Proliferative responsiveness of lymphocytes from Cryptosporidium parvum-exposed mice to two separate antigen fractions from oocysts.J. Am. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.491993393401
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Perryman L. E.,
    2. Mason P. H.,
    3. Chrisp C. E.
    Effect of spleen cell populations on resolution of Cryptosporidium parvum infection in SCID mice.Infect. Immun.62199414741477
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Petersen C.
    Cryptosporidiosis in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus.Clin. Infect. Dis.151992903909
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Peeters J. E.,
    2. Villacorta I.,
    3. Vanopdenbosch E.,
    4. Vandergheynst D.,
    5. Naciri M.,
    6. Ares-Mazas E.,
    7. Yvore P.
    Cryptosporidium parvum in calves: kinetics and immunoblot analysis of specific serum and local antibody responses (immunoglobulin A [IgA], IgG, and IgM) after natural and experimental infections.Infect. Immun.60199223092316
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Ptak W.,
    2. Askenase P. W.
    γδ T cells assist αβ T cells in adoptive transfer of contact sensitivity.J. Immunol.149199235033508
    OpenUrlAbstract
  40. 40.↵
    1. Reperant J. M.,
    2. Naciri M.,
    3. Chardes T.,
    4. Bout D. T.
    Immunological characterization of a 17-kDa antigen from Cryptosporidium parvum recognized early by mucosal IgA antibodies.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.991992714
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    1. Riggs M. W.
    Immunology: host response and development of passive immunotherapy and vaccines Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis. Fayer R. 1997 129 162 CRC Press New York, N.Y
  42. 42.↵
    1. Riggs M. W.,
    2. Stone A. L.,
    3. Yount P. A.,
    4. Langer R. C.,
    5. Arrowood M. J.,
    6. Bentley D.
    Protective monoclonal antibody defines a circumsporozoite-like glycoprotein exoantigen of Cryptosporidium parvum sporozoites and merozoites.J. Immunol.158199717871795
    OpenUrlAbstract
  43. 43.↵
    1. Sterling C. R.,
    2. Arrowood M. J.
    Detection of Cryptosporidium sp. infections using a direct immunofluorescent assay.Pediatr. Infect. Dis.51986S139S142
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Taghi-Kilani R.,
    2. Sekal L.,
    3. Hayglass K. T.
    The role of humoral immunity in Cryptosporidium spp. infection: studies with B-cell depleted mice.J. Immunol.145199015711576
    OpenUrlAbstract
  45. 45.↵
    1. Taguchi T.,
    2. Aicher W. K.,
    3. Fujihashi K.,
    4. Yamamoto M.,
    5. McGhee J. R.,
    6. Bluestone J. A.,
    7. Kiyono H.
    Novel function for intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes: murine CD3+ gamma-delta TCR+ T cells produce interferon-gamma and interleukin-5.J. Immunol.147199137363744
    OpenUrlAbstract
  46. 46.↵
    1. Tarazona R.,
    2. Lally N. C.,
    3. Dominguez-Carmona M.,
    4. Blewett D. A.
    Characterization of secretory IgA responses in mice infected with Cryptosporidium parvum.Int. J. Parasitol.211997131134
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.↵
    1. Theodos C. M.,
    2. Sullivan K. L.,
    3. Griffiths J. K.,
    4. Tzipori S.
    Profiles of healing and nonhealing Cryptosporidium parvum infection in C57BL/6 mice with functional B and T lymphocytes: the extent of gamma interferon modulation determines the outcome of infection.Infect. Immun.65199747614769
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Tzipori S.
    Cryptosporidiosis in perspective.Adv. Parasitol.27198863129
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    1. Ungar B. L. P.,
    2. Burris J. A.,
    3. Ouin C. A.,
    4. Finkelman F. D.
    New mouse models for chronic Cryptosporidium infection in immunodeficient hosts.Infect. Immun.581990961969
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Ungar B. L. P.,
    2. Kao T.,
    3. Burris J. A.,
    4. Finkelman F. D.
    Cryptosporidium infection in adult mice model; independent role for gamma interferon and CD4+ lymphocytes in protective immunity.J. Immunol.147199110141022
    OpenUrlAbstract
  51. 51.↵
    1. Urban J. F. Jr.,
    2. Fayer R.,
    3. Chen S. J.,
    4. Gause W. C.,
    5. Gately M. K.,
    6. Finkelman F. D.
    IL-12 protects immunocompetent and immunodeficient neonatal mice against infection with Cryptosporidium parvum.J. Immunol.1561996263268
    OpenUrlAbstract
  52. 52.↵
    1. Viney J. L.,
    2. Kilshaw P. J.,
    3. MacDonald T. T.
    Cytotoxic alpha-beta and gamma-delta T cells in murine intestinal epithelium.Eur. J. Immunol.20199016231627
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 53.↵
    1. Zamoyska R.
    The CD8 co-receptor revisited: one chain good, two chains better.Immunity11994243246
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  54. 54.↵
    1. Zu S. X.,
    2. Fang G. D.,
    3. Fayer R.,
    4. Guerrant R. L.
    Cryptosporidiosis: pathogenesis and immunology.Parasitol. Today819922427
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Evidence of Thymus-Independent Local and Systemic Antibody Responses to Cryptosporidium parvum Infection in Nude Mice
Andrew A. Adjei, Janet T. Jones, Michael W. Riggs, F. Javier Enriquez
Infection and Immunity Aug 1999, 67 (8) 3947-3951; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.8.3947-3951.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evidence of Thymus-Independent Local and Systemic Antibody Responses to Cryptosporidium parvum Infection in Nude Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evidence of Thymus-Independent Local and Systemic Antibody Responses to Cryptosporidium parvum Infection in Nude Mice
Andrew A. Adjei, Janet T. Jones, Michael W. Riggs, F. Javier Enriquez
Infection and Immunity Aug 1999, 67 (8) 3947-3951; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.8.3947-3951.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibodies, Protozoan
cryptosporidiosis
Cryptosporidium parvum
Thymus Gland

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522