Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PATHOGENESIS

The Cloned Locus of Enterocyte Effacement from EnterohemorrhagicEscherichia coli O157:H7 Is Unable To Confer the Attaching and Effacing Phenotype upon E. coliK-12

Simon J. Elliott, Jie Yu, James B. Kaper
Simon J. Elliott
Department of Microbiology and Immunology and
Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jie Yu
Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James B. Kaper
Department of Microbiology and Immunology and
Center for Vaccine Development, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.8.4260-4263.1999
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) pathogenicity island of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) O157:H7 possesses the same genes in identical order and orientation as the LEE of enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) O127:H6 but is unable to form attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions or to secrete Esp proteins when it is cloned in an E. coli K-12 background. The A/E phenotype could not be restored by trans complementation with a variety of cloned EPEC LEE fragments, suggesting functional and/or regulatory differences between the LEE pathogenicity islands of EPEC O127:H6 and EHEC O157:H7.

The phenomenon known as attaching and effacing (A/E) is observed in a family of pathogens that include the prototypic A/E pathogen enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) as well as enterohemorrhagic E. coli(EHEC), Citrobacter rodentium, and others (17). The A/E lesion is characterized by the loss of host cell microvilli (effacement) and intimate attachment of the bacterium to the host membrane on a pedestal of polymerized cytoskeletal elements, notably actin (4, 8, 9). Formation of the A/E lesion is accompanied by a number of signal transduction events in the host cell, including activation of protein kinase C, induction of NF-κB, and release of interleukin-8 (reviewed in references 4, 8, and17).

All the genes necessary for A/E lesion formation by EPEC are encoded on a pathogenicity island called the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) (14, 15). In EPEC O127:H6, the LEE is a 35,637-bp element containing 41 predicted open reading frames (ORFs) in at least 10 operons. These genes encode a type III protein translocation complex, secreted proteins including EspA and Tir, the intestinal adhesin intimin (encoded by eae), and 23 ORFs of undefined function (2, 10, 12). The LEE from EHEC O157:H7 strain EDL933 has also been recently cloned and sequenced and possesses all the genes found in the EPEC LEE in the same organization (18). In general, the two LEE elements are 94% conserved at the amino acid level and differ by less than 2% in the regions encoding the protein translocation complex, although divergence of up to 34% is seen in genes encoding proteins that are believed to interact with the host (Fig. 1). The EHEC O157:H7 LEE also encodes a cryptic prophage at one end that is not found in the EPEC O127:H6 LEE. Analysis suggests that the prophage inserted into the LEE after the island was already present on the chromosome and is unlikely to encode any known virulence function (18).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

LEE of EHEC O157:H7 and maps of clones of LEEs from EPEC O127:H6(pCVD462) and EHEC O157:H7(pJAY1512). The degree of genetic divergence in each ORF between the EPEC and EHEC LEEs is represented by shading. R, EcoRI; M, MluI; Sm, SmaI; K, KpnI.

The sequence divergence between the LEEs is reflected in differences in LEE-associated phenotypes. Unlike EPEC, EHEC O157:H7 does not produce a tyrosine-phosphorylated Tir (6) and requires 6 h to cause A/E lesions in an in vitro assay compared to the 3 h required for A/E formation by EPEC (11). EHEC and EPEC have different modes of pathogenesis and colonize different sites in the intestine, due at least in part to differences in intimin (17, 21). However, it is unclear to what extent the differences between EPEC and EHEC are due solely to differences in the LEE. EPEC and EHEC are known to differ at several other loci, including the large virulence-associated plasmid, pili, the Shiga toxin phage (which is absent in EPEC), and the Per regulator (absent in EHEC) (4, 5, 17). Recent work (3, 16, 20) has also demonstrated regulatory differences between EPEC and EHEC.

Isolation of the LEE in a K-12 background will assist in the examination of LEE function in isolation from other EHEC genomic factors. McDaniel and Kaper (15) demonstrated that the cloned EPEC O127:H6 LEE was able to confer the A/E phenotype uponE. coli K-12, including the ability to secrete EspB and translocate Tir into host cells. Therefore, the EPEC LEE is sufficient for the A/E phenotype in E. coli K-12. Since the LEE has been demonstrated to be necessary for A/E lesions and Esp secretion in EHEC O157:H7 strains 85-170 (3) and 86-24 (7), we hypothesized that the cloned LEE from EHEC should also be able to mediate these functions in E. coli K-12. By cloning the EHEC LEE into K-12 we sought to confirm this hypothesis as well as to determine the extent that the differences between EPEC and EHEC are mediated solely by variations between the two LEE elements.

Cloning and mapping the EHEC LEE.The EHEC O157:H7 LEE was cloned from strain 85-170, which is a Δstx variant of strain 84-289. Both 85-170 and 84-289 secrete higher levels of Esp proteins than do EDL933 and other EHEC strains (7), and we have observed that they are also more active in the fluorescent actin stain (FAS) assay. Prior to cloning, the chromosomal locus was mapped by Southern blotting on digested 85-170 chromosomal DNA and probing with the four EPEC LEE fragments identified as LEE A through D by McDaniel et al. (14). The resulting restriction map (Fig. 1) indicated that the LEE of 85-170 was indistinguishable from that of O157:H7 strain EDL933 and similar to that of EPEC. The 85-170 LEE was cloned following the procedure of McDaniel and Kaper (15). Chromosomal DNA was partially digested with PspAI, an isoschizomer of SmaI that generates cohesive ends, ligated into the cosmid vector pCVD551, and transfected into HB101. Colonies were probed with radiolabeled LEE probes A to D. One cosmid, pJAY1512, contained a 37-kb DNA insert that hybridized to all four EPEC LEE probes. Several partial LEE clones were also obtained. pJAY1512 was mapped with restriction enzymes and LEE probes A through D (Fig. 1). This process confirmed and extended the 85-170 LEE map obtained from chromosomal Southern blotting. We found that the cosmid clone pJAY1512 did not contain the LEE-associated prophage found at the extreme end of the EHEC LEE. In addition to pJAY1512, we also obtained the LEE clone pLEEO157 (18) from F. Blattner. pLEEO157 was derived from the chromosome of strain EDL933, a wild-type EHEC O157:H7 strain, by a FLP recombinase-based method (19) and has been entirely sequenced (18). It contains the LEE prophage as well as genes flanking the LEE (18).

Characterization of the cloned EHEC LEE functions.Both pJAY1512 and pLEEO157 in their respective E. coli K-12 host strains (Table 1) were examined in the FAS assay for A/E lesion formation (11). The FAS assay involves incubation of bacteria on a HEp-2 cell tissue culture monolayer for 3 to 6 h during which time the bacteria form A/E lesions on the surfaces of infected cells. The addition of phalloidin-fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate, which binds to actin, allows visualization of actin condensed below the bacteria in the A/E lesion. FAS test results were scored blindly by at least one other independent observer and were repeated at least three times. When the cloned EHEC LEE was tested in different K-12 genetic backgrounds, including HB101, W3110, and DH5α, none of the resulting strains was able to form A/E lesions (Table 1) or secrete Esp proteins (results not shown). This finding contrasts with that for the cloned EPEC LEE (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Strains used in this study and their activities in the FAS assay

We then examined whether the failure of HB101(pJAY1512) to elicit A/E lesions was due to an initial failure to adhere. HB101(pJAY1512) was transformed with plasmids encoding either the afimbrial adhesin AFA-I (13) or pMAR7 (1), which encodes the bundle-forming pili of EPEC as well as other factors, notably the Per transcriptional activator of many EPEC virulence genes (5). The variants expressing AFA-I or bundle-forming pili were much more adherent to HEp-2 cells in the standard adhesion assay (1) (data not shown) but were unable to form A/E lesions.

Clearly, the cloned EHEC O157:H7 LEE is phenotypically different from the cloned EPEC O127:H6 LEE, and this difference is reflected in their sequence divergence. While many genes are highly conserved, other genes diverge quite markedly (18) (Fig. 1). These highly divergent genes may be responsible for the inability of the EHEC LEE to form A/E lesions when it is cloned into E. coli K-12. We hypothesized that complementation of pJAY1512 with plasmids containing regions of the EPEC LEE could restore the A/E phenotype. The ability of cloned EPEC LEE genes to complement mutated EHEC LEE genes in an EHEC background has previously been shown for escN(7), ler (3), and eae(21). Indeed, the cloned EPEC eae gene was able to restore A/E lesion formation to an EHEC Δeae mutant and the resultant complemented strain colonized the intestine in a manner characteristic of EPEC rather than of EHEC (21).

To test for complementation of pJAY1512 with cloned EPEC genes, plasmids containing regions of the EPEC O127:H6 LEE were isolated to ensure that entire operons within hypervariable regions were represented (Fig. 1 and Table 1). These plasmids were transformed into HB101(pJAY1512) and examined by the FAS assay. None of the resulting complemented strains exhibited FAS (Table 1). As a control, we transformed pJAY1512 into CVD451, an escN mutant of EHEC O157:H7 that is unable to form A/E lesions or to secrete Esp proteins (7). The resultant strain, CVD451(pJAY1512), was positive in the 6-h FAS test, indicating that the EHEC LEE clone could rescue the chromosomal escN mutation in an EHEC background.

In summary, our data clearly suggest that the genetic differences between EPEC and EHEC LEE elements are reflected phenotypically when the LEE is cloned into an E. coli K-12 background. While the cloned EPEC LEE was sufficient for A/E lesion formation and Esp secretion in an E. coli K-12 host (15), a similarly cloned LEE from EHEC was inactive in all these assays. This result was confirmed with an independent EHEC LEE clone, pLEEO157. This clone, which was derived from a different O157:H7 strain in a different laboratory by a different methodology, was also negative for the A/E phenotype as shown by the FAS test. The inability of the EHEC LEE clone to mediate A/E lesion formation was not due to an obvious defect in the cloning of the LEE or the inability of the LEE in the native O157:H7 strain to mediate A/E lesions. The EHEC LEE diverges from its EPEC counterpart in several genes, and these genes are a likely source of phenotypic differences between both the wild-type organisms and their cloned LEEs (18). However, complementation of pJAY1512 with subclones representing the entire EPEC LEE was unable to confer A/E lesion activity. Our data also exclude the possibility that failure to form A/E lesions was due to failure to initially associate with the cell, as transformation of HB101(pJAY1512) with plasmids encoding adhesins resulted in increased adhesion but not the A/E phenotype.

These data raise the question of whether only the LEE of EPEC O127:H6 strain E2348/69 is sufficient for A/E lesion formation in an E. coli K-12 background and would imply that the EHEC LEE requires a factor in trans that is not present in E. coliK-12. Recent work (3, 16, 20) has shown that EPEC and EHEC have differences in regulation and also suggest that they may require different factors in trans, a topic which is currently being investigated in our laboratory.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Tim McDaniel for plasmids and advice, Fred Blattner for strain XL1-Blue (pLEEO157), and Maria S. Dubois and Leslie Wainwright for secreted protein preparations.

NIH grants AI21637 and AI41325 and the Ronald McDonald House charities supported this research.

Notes

Editor: P. E. Orndorff

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 21 January 1999.
    • Returned for modification 24 March 1999.
    • Accepted 26 May 1999.
  • Copyright © 1999 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Baldini M. M.,
    2. Kaper J. B.,
    3. Levine M. M.,
    4. Candy D. C.,
    5. Moon H. W.
    Plasmid-mediated adhesion in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr.21983534538
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Elliott S.,
    2. Wainwright L. A.,
    3. McDaniel T.,
    4. MacNamara B.,
    5. Donnenberg M.,
    6. Kaper J. B.
    The complete sequence of the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli E2348/69.Mol. Microbiol.28199814
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Elliott, S. J., V. Sperandio, J. Mellies, J. A. Girón, T. K. McDaniel, S. Hutcheson, and J. B. Kaper. Unpublished data.
  4. 4.↵
    1. Frankel G.,
    2. Philips A. D.,
    3. Rosenshine I.,
    4. Dougan G.,
    5. Kaper J. B.,
    6. Knutton S.
    Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic E. coli: more subversive elements.Mol. Microbiol.301998911921
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Gómez-Duarte O. G.,
    2. Kaper J. B.
    A plasmid-encoded regulatory region activates chromosomal eaeA expression in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli.Infect. Immun.63199517671776
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ismaili A.,
    2. Philpott D. J.,
    3. Dytoc M. T.,
    4. Sherman P. M.
    Signal transduction responses following adhesion of verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli.Infect. Immun.63199533163326
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Jarvis K. G.,
    2. Kaper J. B.
    Secretion of extracellular proteins by enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli via a putative type III secretion system.Infect. Immun.64199648264829
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kaper J. B.,
    2. Elliott S. J.,
    3. Sperandio V.,
    4. Perna N. T.,
    5. Mayhew G. F.,
    6. Blattner F. R.
    Attatching and effacing intestinal histopathology and the locus of enterocyte effacement Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other Shiga-toxin-producing E. coli strains. Kaper J. B., O’Brien A. D. 1998 163 182 ASM Press Washington, D.C
  9. 9.↵
    1. Kaper J. B.
    EPEC delivers the goods.Trends Microbiol.61998169172
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Kenny B.,
    2. DeVinney R.,
    3. Stein M.,
    4. Reinscheid D. J.,
    5. Frey E. A.,
    6. Finlay B. B.
    Enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) transfers its receptor for intimate adherence into mammalian cells.Cell911997511520
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Knutton S.,
    2. Baldwin T.,
    3. Williams P. H.,
    4. McNeish A. S.
    Actin accumulation at sites of bacterial adhesion to tissue culture cells: basis of a new diagnostic test for enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli.Infect. Immun.57198912901298
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Knutton S.,
    2. Rosenshine I.,
    3. Pallen M. J.,
    4. Nisan I.,
    5. Neves B. C.,
    6. Bain C.,
    7. Wolff C.,
    8. Dougan G.,
    9. Frankel G.
    A novel EspA-associated surface organelle of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli involved in protein translocation into epithelial cells.EMBO J.17199821662176
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. 13.↵
    1. Labigne-Roussel A. F.,
    2. Lark D.,
    3. Schoolnik G.,
    4. Falkow S.
    Cloning and expression of an afimbrial adhesin (AFA-I) responsible for P blood group-independent, mannose-resistant hemagglutination from a pyelonephritic Escherichia coli strain.Infect. Immun.461984251259
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. McDaniel T. K.,
    2. Jarvis K. G.,
    3. Donnenberg M. S.,
    4. Kaper J. B.
    A genetic locus of enterocyte effacement conserved among diverse enterobacterial pathogens.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92199516641668
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. McDaniel T. K.,
    2. Kaper J. B.
    A cloned pathogenicity island from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli confers the attaching and effacing phenotype on E. coli K-12.Mol. Microbiol.231997399407
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Mellies, J., S. J. Elliott, V. Sperandio, M. S. Donnenberg, and J. B. Kaper. The Per regulon of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: identification of a regulatory cascade and a novel transcriptional activator, the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE)-encoded regulator (Ler). Mol. Microbiol., in press.
  17. 17.↵
    1. Nataro J. P.,
    2. Kaper J. B.
    Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.111998142201
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Perna N. T.,
    2. Mayhew G. F.,
    3. Pósfai G.,
    4. Elliott S. J.,
    5. Donnenberg M. S.,
    6. Kaper J. B.,
    7. Blattner F. R.
    Molecular evolution of a pathogenicity island from enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7.Infect. Immun.66199838103817
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Pósfai G.,
    2. Koob M. D.,
    3. Kirkpatrick H. A.,
    4. Blattner F. R.
    Versatile insertion plasmids for targeted genome manipulations in bacteria: isolation, deletion, and rescue of the pathogenicity island LEE of the Escherichia coli O157:H7 genome.J. Bacteriol.179199744264428
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Sperandio, V., J. L. Mellies, W. Nguyen, and J. B. Kaper. Regulation by Quorum sensing of genes encoding the type III secretion system in enterohemorrhagic E. coliO157:H7. Submitted for publication.
  21. 21.↵
    1. Tzipori S.,
    2. Gunzer F.,
    3. Donnenberg M. S.,
    4. de Montigny L.,
    5. Kaper J. B.,
    6. Donohue-Rolfe A.
    The role of the eaeA gene in diarrhea and neurological complications in a gnotobiotic piglet model of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection.Infect. Immun.6319953621362
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
The Cloned Locus of Enterocyte Effacement from EnterohemorrhagicEscherichia coli O157:H7 Is Unable To Confer the Attaching and Effacing Phenotype upon E. coliK-12
Simon J. Elliott, Jie Yu, James B. Kaper
Infection and Immunity Aug 1999, 67 (8) 4260-4263; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.8.4260-4263.1999

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Cloned Locus of Enterocyte Effacement from EnterohemorrhagicEscherichia coli O157:H7 Is Unable To Confer the Attaching and Effacing Phenotype upon E. coliK-12
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The Cloned Locus of Enterocyte Effacement from EnterohemorrhagicEscherichia coli O157:H7 Is Unable To Confer the Attaching and Effacing Phenotype upon E. coliK-12
Simon J. Elliott, Jie Yu, James B. Kaper
Infection and Immunity Aug 1999, 67 (8) 4260-4263; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.67.8.4260-4263.1999
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Chromosome Mapping
Escherichia coli
Intestines

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522