Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Fungal and Parasitic Infections

Disparate Requirement for T Cells in Resistance to Mucosal and Acute Systemic Candidiasis

Jessica Jones-Carson, Andres Vazquez-Torres, Thomas Warner, Edward Balish
Jessica Jones-Carson
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver, Colorado, and Departments of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andres Vazquez-Torres
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Health Science Center, Denver, Colorado, and Departments of
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Warner
Surgical Pathology,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward Balish
Surgery, and
Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.4.2363-2365.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Although highly susceptible to orogastric candidiasis, T-cell receptor δ- and α-chain knockout mice, deficient in γδ and αβ T cells, respectively, were found to be resistant to disseminated candidiasis of endogenous origin and to acute systemic candidiasis (resulting from intravenous injection).

Several immunosuppressive and immunodeficiency-related conditions predispose humans to candidiasis (12, 13, 15). In general, animal and clinical studies suggest that T cells are important for resistance to mucosal candidiasis and to systemic candidiasis of endogenous origin. For instance, CD4 deficiencies in humans and T-cell defects in animal models, such as those found in SCID, athymic, major histocompatibility complex class I knockout (KO) mice and γδ- or CD4+-T-cell-depleted mice, have all been associated with increased susceptibility to mucosal candidiasis (1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 11). Some of these T-cell deficiencies, however, have been associated with hyperresistance to experimentally induced systemic candidiasis (1, 6, 8, 14), thus suggesting that T cells inhibit clearance and may even contribute to the pathology of acute systemic candidiasis. To better understand the roles of different T-cell subsets in resistance to orogastric and systemic candidiasis, mice with genetically engineered deficiencies in αβ or γδ T cells (i.e., T-cell receptor [TCR] α- and δ-chain KO mice, respectively) were used in this study. We now report that mice without αβ or γδ T cells are susceptible to orogastric candidiasis; however, neither T-cell subset appears to be required for murine resistance to acute systemic candidiasis or to systemic candidiasis of endogenous (alimentary tract) origin.

TCR δ and α-chain KO mice (Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Maine) and the corresponding C57BL/6 × L129 controls were derived into the germfree state at the University of Wisconsin Gnotobiote Laboratory in Madison (1), and their gnotobiotic and T-cell-deficient statuses were tested as previously described (10, 19). Germfree mice were orally swabbed with a suspension of 108Candida albicans CFU/ml. Colonization of the alimentary tract by the fungus was confirmed 3 days later by culturing fecal contents on Sabouraud dextrose agar. At several time points following colonization with C. albicans, the mice were euthanized and their orogastric tissues—i.e., tongue, hard palate, esophagus, and stomach tissues—were fixed in 10% buffered formalin and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Gomori's methenamine silver for histologic analysis (2). These mice were also tested for extraintestinal dissemination of C. albicans by culturing spleen, liver, kidney, and brain homogenates on Sabouraud dextrose agar. The susceptibility of T-cell-deficient and control mice to systemic candidiasis was assessed by determining the fungal burdens in spleen, liver, kidney, and brain tissues of mice inoculated intravenously with 104 CFU of C. albicans.

Between 10 and 30 days after colonization with C. albicans, both TCR α- and δ-chain KO mice had similar grades of mucosal infection (histopathology scores of 2.5, as defined by the presence of budding yeast cells and hyphal penetration) but different incidences (100 and 50%, respectively) of orogastric infection (Table1; Fig. 1). In contrast to beige-athymic mice, which are deficient in phagocytic cells and thymus-educated T-cell and natural killer cell function (5), adult TCR α-chain KO mice, deficient in αβ T cells, and TCR δ-chain KO mice, deficient in γδ T cells, did not die when their gastrointestinal tracts were chronically colonized withC. albicans (30-day study). However, chronic colonization proved lethal for infant TCR α-chain KO mice. Ten 3-week-old TCR α-chain KO mice, born to and raised by two different C. albicans-monoassociated TCR α-chain KO mothers, became emaciated and died at about 21 days after birth. Their esophagi were occluded byC. albicans and squamous debris (Fig.2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

TCR α- and δ-chain KO mice are susceptible to orogastric candidiasis after oral colonization with a pure culture of C. albicans

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Grade 3 infection of stomach by C. albicansin an 11-week-old TCR δ-chain KO mouse that was colonized for 10 days. Arrows indicate hyphae. All adult mice used for this study were 8 to 15 weeks of age. Germfree mice were orally colonized by swabbing their mouths with 108 CFU of C. albicans as previously described (18). At least two or three longitudinal sections of tissues were stained and examined for each mouse. Gomori's methenamine silver stain; magnification, ×80.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Occlusion of esophagus by C. albicans in a 3-week-old TCR α-chain KO mouse that was colonized at birth. Gomori's methenamine silver stain; magnification, ×80.

Unfortunately, TCR δ-chain KO mice did not breed well under germfree or C. albicans-monoassociated conditions, so the role of γδ T cells in conferring protection to young animals is unclear. Nevertheless, it is interesting that two pups that were born to aC. albicans-colonized TCR δ-chain KO mother survived to adulthood and showed no indication of orogastric lesions when they were sacrificed at 5 months of age.

In summary, adult αβ- or γδ-T-cell-deficient mice can survive oral colonization with C. albicans; however, αβ T cells appear to be essential for protecting infant mice from the lethal effects of a natural C. albicans colonization obtained by contact with colonized mothers. Immunocompetent C57BL/6 × L129 controls showed no histologic evidence of orogastric candidiasis at the time points (30 days or at birth) examined in this study. In accordance with other studies (1-3, 5, 10-12, 14), the hyphae and budding yeast cells present on mucosal surfaces of either TCR-KO strain of mouse colonized by C. albicans suggest that both αβ and γδ T cells participate in host resistance to mucosal candidiasis.

No disseminated candidiasis was detected in the spleens, livers, kidneys, or brains of orally colonized immunocompetent or TCR-deficient mice, regardless of the grade of mucosal infection sustained. The latter data suggest that αβ and γδ T cells are not required for protection of mice from systemic candidiasis of endogenous origin. Paradoxically, the absence of CD8+ T cells or the lack of an major histocompatibility complex class I classical or nonclassical antigen-presenting pathway does lead to dissemination from the mucosal surface to internal organs (3). Other immune system defects associated with dissemination include concomitant defects in phagocytes, natural killer cells, and CD4+ T cells (i.e., bg/bg nu/nu mice [5]), depletion of phagocytes in SCID mice (9), and genetic abrogation of intracellular adhesion molecules which impair leukocyte infiltration and activation (7). T- and B-cell-deficient SCID mice with intact phagocytic function, although somewhat more susceptible to gastric candidiasis than immunocompetent controls, manifest resistance to disseminated candidiasis of endogenous origin and to acute systemic candidiasis (2, 14). Perhaps the disruption of the balance between T-cell subsets and phagocytic cell deficiencies lead to diminished resistance to disseminated candidiasis of endogenous origin.

Both TCR δ- and α-chain KO mice eliminated C. albicansfrom the spleen, liver, kidney, and brain by day 14 after intravenous challenge with 104C. albicans CFU, which is in sharp contrast with the 105C. albicans CFU per g of dry tissue we observed in intravenously challenged immunocompetent controls (Fig. 3). The latter results suggest that resistance to acute systemic candidiasis is independent of αβ and γδ T cells. Our data are consistent with previous studies with patients and animal models which have noted that defects in innate, T-cell-independent immune responses, such as those associated with chronic granulomatous disease or myeloperoxidase deficiencies, predispose humans to systemic, but not mucosal, candidiasis (13, 15, 16). Also, in view of the resistance of T-cell-deficient mice (references 3, 6, and 8 and this study) and in light of the increased susceptibility of B-cell-deficient (18), phagocyte-deficient (4, 5, 9), and thymically reconstituted nude mice (17) to systemic candidiasis, it is likely that B cells and/or phagocytes, rather than αβ and γδ T cells, play an important and dominant role in host resistance to acute systemic candidiasis. In fact, our data suggest that T cells may contribute to immunopathology in this particular presentation of the disease, because T-cell-competent mice were more susceptible to renal candidiasis than T-cell-deficient (TCR α- or δ-chain KO) mice (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Susceptibility of genetically engineered αβ- and γδ-T-cell-deficient mice to acute systemic candidiasis. Immunocompetent (wild-type) and TCR α-chain KO (TCR α-KO) or δ-chain KO (TCR δ-KO) mice were inoculated intravenously with 104 CFU of C. albicans. C. albicans-inoculated mice were sacrificed at days 1, 3, 7 (wild type and TCR δ-KO), and 14 (wild type, TCR δ-KO, and TCR α-KO) days after infection, and the numbers of CFU in the liver, spleen, kidney, and brain were determined. Data are expressed as mean log10 CFU of C. albicans per gram (dry weight) of tissue ± standard error of the mean and represent three separate experiments with a minimum of six mice per time interval. ∗, P < 0.05 as determined by Student's t -test. Organs from which no viable C. albicansorganisms were recovered were assigned a value of 1.

Our experiments with these murine models support clinical observations that T-cell deficiencies are associated with susceptibility to orogastric candidiasis. Novel to this study was the observation that both T-cell subsets independently participated in host immunity to orogastric candidiasis while their presence during acute systemic challenge exacerbated murine susceptibility to renal candidiasis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Donna Brackett for secretarial preparation of the manuscript and R. D. Wagner for help in collecting some of the tissues for histological analysis. We also thank JoAnne Croft and the staff of the Gnotobiote Laboratory at the University of Wisconsin—Madison for maintaining the animals used in this study.

Notes

Editor: T. R. Kozel

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 6 July 1999.
    • Returned for modification 23 August 1999.
    • Accepted 3 January 2000.
  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Balish E.,
    2. Balish M. J.,
    3. Salkowski C. A.,
    4. Lee K. W.,
    5. Bartizal K. F.
    Colonization of congenitally athymic, gnotobiotic mice by Candida albicans.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.471984647652
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Balish E.,
    2. Jensen J.,
    3. Warner T.,
    4. Brekke J.,
    5. Leonard H.
    Mucosal and disseminated candidiasis in gnotobiotic SCID mice.J. Med. Vet. Mycol.311993143154
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Balish E.,
    2. Vazquez-Torres F. A.,
    3. Jones-Carson J.,
    4. Wagner R. D.,
    5. Warner T.
    Importance of β2-microglobulin in murine resistance to mucosal and systemic candidiasis.Infect. Immun.64199650925097
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cantorna M. T.,
    2. Balish E.
    Mucosal and systemic candidiasis in congenitally immunodeficient mice.Infect. Immun.58199010931100
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Cantorna M. T.,
    2. Balish E.
    Role of CD4+ lymphocytes in resistance to mucosal candidiasis.Infect. Immun.59199124472455
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Cutler J. E.
    Acute systemic candidiasis in normal and congenitally thymic-deficient (nude) mice.J. Reticuloendothel. Soc.191976121124
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Davis S. L.,
    2. Hawkins E. P.,
    3. Mason E. O. Jr.,
    4. Smith C. W.,
    5. Kaplan S. L.
    Host defenses against disseminated candidiasis are impaired in intercellular adhesion molecule 1-deficient mice.J. Infect. Dis.1741996435439
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jensen J.,
    2. Warner T.,
    3. Balish E.
    Resistance of SCID mice to Candida albicans administered intravenously or colonizing the gut: role of polymorphonuclear leukocytes and macrophages.J. Infect. Dis.1671993912919
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    1. Jensen J.,
    2. Warner T.,
    3. Balish E.
    The role of phagocytic cells in murine resistance to disseminated candidiasis in granulocytopenic mice.J. Infect. Dis.1701994900905
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Jones-Carson J.,
    2. Vazquez-Torres F. A.,
    3. Balish E.
    B cell-independent selection of memory T cells after mucosal immunization with Candida albicans.J. Immunol.158199743284335
    OpenUrlAbstract
  11. 11.↵
    1. Jones-Carson J.,
    2. Vazquez-Torres A.,
    3. van der Heyde H. C.,
    4. Warner T.,
    5. Wagner R. D.,
    6. Balish E.
    γδ T cell-induced nitric oxide production enhances resistance to mucosal candidiasis.Nat. Med.11995552557
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Klein R. S.,
    2. Harris C. A.,
    3. Small C. B.,
    4. Moll B.,
    5. Lesser M.,
    6. Friedland G. H.
    Oral candidiasis in high-risk patients as the initial manifestation of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.N. Engl. J. Med.3111984354358
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Lehrer R. I.
    Measurement of candidacidal activity of specific leukocyte types in mixed cell populations. I. Normal, myeloperoxidase-deficient, and chronic granulomatous disease neutrophils.Infect. Immun.219704247
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Narayanan R.,
    2. Joyce W. A.,
    3. Greenfield R. A.
    Gastrointestinal candidiasis in a murine model of severe combined immunodeficiency syndrome.Infect. Immun.59199121162119
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Oh M. K.,
    2. Rodey C. E.,
    3. Good R. A.,
    4. Chilgren R. A.,
    5. Quie P. G.
    Defective candidacidal capacity of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in chronic granulomatous disease of childhood.J. Pediatr.751969300303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Parry M. F.,
    2. Root R. K.,
    3. Metcalf J. A.,
    4. Delaney K. K.,
    5. Kaplow L. S.,
    6. Richar W. J.
    Myeloperoxidase deficiency: prevalence and clinical significance.Ann. Intern. Med.951981293301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    1. Rogers T. J.,
    2. Balish E.,
    3. Manning D. D.
    The role of thymus-dependent cell-mediated immunity in resistance to experimental disseminated candidiasis.J. Reticuloendothel. Soc.291976291298
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    1. Wagner R. D.,
    2. Vazquez-Torres A.,
    3. Jones-Carson J.,
    4. Warner T.,
    5. Balish E.
    B cell knockout mice are resistant to mucosal and systemic candidiasis of endogenous origin but susceptible to experimental systemic candidiasis.J. Infect. Dis.1741996589597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Yale C. E.,
    2. Balish E.
    Blood and serum chemistry values of gnotobiotic beagles.Lab. Anim. Sci.261976633639
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Disparate Requirement for T Cells in Resistance to Mucosal and Acute Systemic Candidiasis
Jessica Jones-Carson, Andres Vazquez-Torres, Thomas Warner, Edward Balish
Infection and Immunity Apr 2000, 68 (4) 2363-2365; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.4.2363-2365.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Disparate Requirement for T Cells in Resistance to Mucosal and Acute Systemic Candidiasis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Disparate Requirement for T Cells in Resistance to Mucosal and Acute Systemic Candidiasis
Jessica Jones-Carson, Andres Vazquez-Torres, Thomas Warner, Edward Balish
Infection and Immunity Apr 2000, 68 (4) 2363-2365; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.4.2363-2365.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Candidiasis
T-lymphocytes

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522