Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Letters to the Editor

Which Routes Do Plasmodium Sporozoites Use for Successful Infections of Vertebrates?

Antoniana U. Krettli, Luciana A. B. Dantas
Antoniana U. Krettli
Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou/FIOCRUZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luciana A. B. Dantas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.5.3064-3065.2000
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In mice, sporozoites of Plasmodium berghei delivered by mosquito bites are significantly more infectious than those transmitted by intravenous (i.v.) inoculation, as shown by Vaughan et al. (3). Using the chicken malaria P. gallinaceum in its natural host we obtained similar results. Sporozoites delivered by bites of two to five Aedes fluviatilis mosquitoes infected 100% of 1-week old chicks after prepatent periods (PPP) of 4 to 7 days, resulting in mortality of all birds. Sporozoites injected by syringe also cause malaria, although with lower parasitemia, longer PPP (∼11 days), and lower mortality (40% to 75%). Unlike P. berghei and all other sporozoites that infect mammals (which develop in the hepatocytes), P. gallinaceum sporozoites initially invade and develop within skin macrophages at the site of injection, rather than in other tissues.

The route by which sporozoites reach the hepatocytes is still debatable although their suggested transport via the lymphoid system (3) could well be through macrophages and/or Küppfer cells. The fact that P. berghei sporozoites enter and leave macrophages without being destroyed and that all attempts to cultivate the mammalian plasmodium sporozoites in hepatocytes have resulted in an extremely low percentage of infections supports this hypothesis. In addition, opsonized P. berghei sporozoites phagocytized by macrophages or Küpffer cells are destroyed.

In the presence of stage-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAb of ≥3 μg), sporozoite invasion and/or development in macrophages is totally abrogated (2), indicating that in vitro, the primary exoerythrocytic forms of P. gallinaceum developing inside macrophages are susceptible to being killed by antibodies. A direct correlation occurs between the protective effect of MAb in vitro and in vivo. Thus, in vitro suspensions of sporozoites plus MAb injected i.v. did not cause infection when we used the active MAb. All control chicks receiving sporozoites with medium or specific MAb with no activity in vitro had patent malaria and high parasitemia (2).

In the mouse model, high doses of passively transferred specific MAb antisporozoites inactivated sporozoites given i.v. but not through mosquito bites (3). This result strongly suggests the presence of protective mechanisms other than the blocking of sporozoite invasion into the host cell by MAb. Furthermore, in mice challenged with mosquito bites, protection hardly occurred, despite MAb transfer. We propose that macrophage killing of the opsonized sporozoites did not occur because the parasites were taken up by skin macrophages in the presence of low immunoglobulin G levels not sufficient to opsonize the parasites.

Finally, since high homology between DNA sequences of the circumsporozoite genes has been described for P. falciparumand P. gallinaceum (1) supporting a close phylogenetic relationship between these two species, it is quite possible that other similarities between the life cycles of avian and mammalian malaria parasites do exist. However, the role of macrophages in sporozoite transport and/or in antibody-mediated destruction ofP. falciparum sporozoites and other mammalian malaria parasites is highly relevant to vaccine development and deserves further study, since antibodies are the key to antisporozoite protection.

  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. McCutchan T. F.,
    2. Kissinger J. C.,
    3. Touray M. G.,
    4. Rogers M. J.,
    5. Li J.,
    6. Sullivan M.,
    7. Braga E. M.,
    8. Krettli A. U.,
    9. Miller L. H.
    Comparison of circumsporozoite proteins from avian and mammalian malarias: biological and phylogenetic implications.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9319961188911894
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Ramirez A. D.,
    2. Rocha E. M.,
    3. Krettli A. U.
    Antisporozoite antibodies with protective and non-protective activities: in vitro and in vivo correlation using Plasmodium gallinaceum, an avian model.J. Eukaryot. Microbiol.421995705708
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Vaughan J. A.,
    2. Scheller L. F.,
    3. Wirtz R. A.,
    4. Azad A. F.
    Infectivity of Plasmodium berghei sporozoites delivered by intravenous inoculation versus mosquito bite: implications for sporozoite vaccine trials.Infect. Immun.67199942854289
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

AUTHORS’ REPLY

AUTHOR'S REPLY

The question of how mosquito-transmitted sporozoites reach the liver is longstanding and unresolved. We now know that most sporozoites are not injected directly into the bloodstream, as is commonly depicted in life cycle diagrams. Since the early works of Boyd and Kitchen (1-1), evidence has steadily accumulated to indicate that during mosquito probing, most transmitted sporozoites are deposited as clumps within the skin and that there is a substantial delay in the movement of mosquito-transmitted sporozoites away from the site of the mosquito bite (1-4, 1-6). There are two possible routes that mosquito-transmitted sporozoites can take to move away from the bite site—entry into efferent capillaries directly or, more plausibly, via lymphatic drainage (1-3).

If mosquito-transmitted sporozoites enter the circulation via the lymphatics, then it is all the more remarkable that they are so efficient in reaching the liver. The lymphatic route is circuitous and seemingly fraught with danger. In order to reach the liver via the lymphatics, mosquito-transmitted sporozoites must pass through lymph nodes to reach the thoracic or right lymphatic ducts which then empty into brachiocephalic veins and into the superior vena cava. Sporozoites would then pass through the right atrium/ventricle and into the pulmonary circulation, including a passage through the alveolar capillary plexus. The left atrium/ventricle would propel the sporozoites through the aortic arch and descending aorta. If sporozoites were fortunate enough to enter the celiac trunk on their first pass through the systemic circulation, they may be sent directly into the liver via the common hepatic artery or, more likely, into the other arterial branches of the celiac trunk to the stomach, pancreas, or spleen. A bit further down the aorta, sporozoites might be sent into the superior mesenteric artery. In either case, sporozoites would have to pass through capillary beds of the lower digestive system before entering the hepatic portal system and arriving at the relative calm of the sluggish circulation within the liver sinusoids.

For mammalian plasmodia, the traditional view holds that sporozoites travel to the liver extracellularly. Drs. Krettli and Dantas offer an alternative scenario—one inspired by their work with avian plasmodia and to which I refer to informally as the “taxicab hypothesis.” In this scenario, mosquito-transmitted sporozoites quickly invade macrophages (or some other leukocyte type) in the skin and are then carried inside of host leukocytes with the draining lymph, away from the bite site, through the perilous lymph nodes, and on to the liver. It has been demonstrated that sporozoites are fully capable of “actively and aggressively” moving into and out of macrophages (1-8). Indeed, the bioactive substances in mosquito saliva may potentiate host edema and leukocyte infiltration to the site of sporozoite deposition (1-2, 1-5). As Drs. Krettli and Dantas suggest, the taxicab hypothesis may explain why many mosquito-transmitted sporozoites are able to elude the host protective effects of passively administered anticircumsporozoite monoclonal antibodies, whereas many intravenously inoculated sporozoites (i.e., “naked” sporozoites) are not (1-9).

The mechanism(s) by which mosquito-transmitted sporozoites complete their journey to the liver remains unknown. But if a sporozoite vaccine is to succeed, the biology of this journey needs to be elucidated. In his classic work on sporozoite transmission (1-7), Vanderberg noted that “…until it becomes possible to label sporozoites and track them…there seems no way to assess the total numbers actually inoculated by mosquitoes” or, in this case, to determine how mosquito-transmitted sporozoites reach the liver. Recent success in producing a stably transformed line of P. berghei in which sporozoites express green fluorescent protein (Kenneth Vernick, personal communication) may prove useful in monitoring the progress of mosquito-transmitted sporozoites as they move from the skin to the liver.

  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1-1.↵
    1. Boyd M. F.,
    2. Kitchen S. F.
    The demonstration of sporozoites in human tissues. Am. J. Trop. Med. 9 1939 27 31
    OpenUrl
  2. 1-2.↵
    1. Goldman L.,
    2. Rockwell E.,
    3. Richfield D. F.
    III. Histopathological studies on cutaneous reactions to the bites of various arthropods. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1 1952 514 525
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 1-3.↵
    1. Griffiths R. B.,
    2. Gordon R. H.
    An apparatus which enables the process of feeding by mosquitoes to be observed in the tissues of a live rodent; together with an account of the ejection of saliva and its significance in malaria. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 46 1952 311 319
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 1-4.↵
    1. Ponnudurai T.,
    2. Lensen A. H.,
    3. van Gemert G. J.,
    4. Bolmer M. G.,
    5. Meuwissen J. H.
    Feeding behaviour and sporozoite ejection by infected Anopheles stephensi. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 85 1991 175 180
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 1-5.↵
    1. Rockwell E. M.,
    2. Johnson P.
    The insect bit reaction. II. Evaluation of the allergic reaction. J. Investig. Dermatol. 19 1952 137 155
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 1-6.↵
    1. Sidjanski S.,
    2. Vanderberg J. P.
    Delayed migration of Plasmodium sporozoites from the mosquito bite site to the blood. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 57 1997 426 429
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 1-7.↵
    1. Vanderberg J. P.
    Plasmodium berghei: quantitation of sporozoites injected by mosquitoes feeding a rodent host. Exp. Parasitol. 42 1977 169 181
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 1-8.↵
    1. Vanderberg J. P.,
    2. Stewart M. J.
    Plasmodium sporozoite-host cell interactions during sporozoite invasion. Bull. W. H. O. 68 (Suppl.) 1990 74 79
    OpenUrl
  9. 1-9.↵
    1. Vaughan J. A.,
    2. Scheller L. F.,
    3. Wirtz R. A.,
    4. Azad A. F.
    Infectivity of Plasmodium berghei sporozoites delivered by intravenous inoculation versus mosquito bite: implications for sporozoite vaccine trials. Infect. Immun. 67 1999 4285 4289
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Which Routes Do Plasmodium Sporozoites Use for Successful Infections of Vertebrates?
Antoniana U. Krettli, Luciana A. B. Dantas
Infection and Immunity May 2000, 68 (5) 3064-3065; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.5.3064-3065.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Which Routes Do Plasmodium Sporozoites Use for Successful Infections of Vertebrates?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Which Routes Do Plasmodium Sporozoites Use for Successful Infections of Vertebrates?
Antoniana U. Krettli, Luciana A. B. Dantas
Infection and Immunity May 2000, 68 (5) 3064-3065; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.5.3064-3065.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
    • AUTHOR'S REPLY
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Plasmodium

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522