Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PATHOGENESIS

Expression of Staphylococcus aureusClumping Factor A in Lactococcus lactis subsp.cremoris Using a New Shuttle Vector

Yok-Ai Que, Jacques-Antoine Haefliger, Patrick Francioli, Philippe Moreillon
Yok-Ai Que
Division of Infectious Diseases, 1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jacques-Antoine Haefliger
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrick Francioli
Division of Infectious Diseases, 1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philippe Moreillon
Division of Infectious Diseases, 1
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.6.3516-3522.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Staphylococcus aureus harbors redundant adhesins mediating tissue colonization and infection. To evaluate their intrinsic role outside of the staphylococcal background, a system was designed to express them in Lactococcus lactis subsp.cremoris 1363. This bacterium is devoid of virulence factors and has a known genetic background. A new Escherichia coli-L. lactis shuttle and expression vector was constructed for this purpose. First, the high-copy-number lactococcal plasmid pIL253 was equipped with the oriColE1 origin, generating pOri253 that could replicate in E. coli. Second, the lactococcal promoters P23 or P59 were inserted at one end of the pOri253 multicloning site. Gene expression was assessed by a luciferase reporter system. The plasmid carrying P23 (named pOri23) expressed luciferase constitutively at a level 10,000 times greater than did the P59-containing plasmid. Transcription was absent in E. coli. The staphylococcal clumping factor A (clfA) gene was cloned into pOri23 and used as a model system. Lactococci carrying pOri23-clfA produced an unaltered and functional 130-kDa ClfA protein attached to their cell walls. This was indicated both by the presence of the protein in Western blots of solubilized cell walls and by the ability of ClfA-positive lactococci to clump in the presence of plasma. ClfA-positive lactococci had clumping titers (titer of 4,112) similar to those of S. aureus Newman in soluble fibrinogen and bound equally well to solid-phase fibrinogen. These experiments provide a new way to study individual staphylococcal pathogenic factors and might complement both classical knockout mutagenesis and modern in vivo expression technology and signature tag mutagenesis.

Staphylococcus aureus is a major pathogen responsible for a wide range of both acute and chronic infections (37). A key step in S. aureusinfection is its ability to attach to various surfaces and colonize host tissues. For this purpose, S. aureus carries several functionally redundant surface adhesins, which have high affinity for either soluble proteins or extracellular-matrix components of the host (26, 38). These include, for instance, prothrombin (28), fibrinogen (18, 25), fibronectin (11,33), vitronectin (14), and collagen (27), as well as other constituents.

Since attachment to host tissues is an essential step of S. aureus disease, it was assumed that interfering with bacterial adhesion could be a means to prevent infection. This possibility was investigated in staphylococcal mutants defective in one or more of these cell-wall-associated ligands (9, 18, 22). Knockout mutants were tested both in vitro for their decreased adherence to purified ligands and in vivo for their lower pathogenicity in various animal models. When compared to their parent strains, the defective mutants were always significantly less able to attach to surfaces coated with purified ligands (4, 9, 18). Unexpectedly, however, these differences did not translate into major alterations of pathogenicity in vivo. Infectivity was either moderately or not affected in animal models such as experimental mammary abscesses in mice or experimental endocarditis in rats (1, 22).

The reason of this discrepancy was unclear. However, since S. aureus carry redundant adhesins on their surface, it was conceivable that other, functionally redundant adhesins were complementing the deficient mutant, thus masking the genuine effect of the defective determinant. If true, then studying the pathogenic role of individual surface factors in the redundant staphylococcal background might be a difficult task. To circumvent this problem, we attempted to transfer and express specific staphylococcal adhesins in a surrogate bacterium lacking the staphylococcal redundant background, and we tested the recombinants for a gain in infectivity in vivo. Experiments with Streptococcus gordonii indicated that the method was feasible (P. Stutzmann, J. Entenza, P. Francioli, and P. Moreillon, Abstr. 38th Intersci. Conf. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., abstr. B77, 1998). However, S. gordonii was not a perfect recipient because it carried pathogenic determinants of its own. Therefore, in the present experiments we refined this system by usingLactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris (6) as a recipient organism. This gram-positive bacterium is not known to carry adhesins to mammal matrix proteins and has a well-characterized genetic background. Moreover, both staphylococci and lactococci process their cell wall proteins in a similar way, using the conserved LPXTG C-terminal motif to anchor the polypeptides to the peptidoglycan (32). This condition is absolutely required if staphylococcal proteins are to be expressed on the surface of the recipient cells.

The following experiments describe the successful cloning and expression of the staphylococcal clumping factor A (clfA) inL. lactis. A new expression vector allowing the shuttling of cloned genes between Escherichia coli and L. lactis was constructed, and the functionality of the transferredclfA product was assessed by the ability ofclfA-positive lactococci to clump in the presence of plasma or fibrinogen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth conditions. L. lactis subsp. cremoris 1363 (kindly provided by A. Gruss) (7, 8) was grown at 30°C in M17 medium (Oxoid) supplemented with 0.5% glucose (GM17) either in liquid medium or on agar plates (35). S. aureus Newman (5) was grown at 37°C either in tryptic soy broth (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.) or on tryptic soy agar (Difco). E. coliXL1-Blue was grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani medium (Difco) (31). Whenever appropriate, antibiotics were added to the media as follows: erythromycin at 5 μg/ml for L. lactisand at 500 μg/ml for E. coli and ampicillin at 50 μg/ml for E. coli. Bacterial stocks were kept at −70°C in liquid medium supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) of glycerol.

Plasmids and plasmid constructions.The plasmids and plasmids constructions used in this study are listed in Table1. Chromosomal DNA from S. aureus Newman was prepared as described by Marmur (17). The same procedure was applied to extract DNA from L. lactissubsp. cremoris 1363, except that lactococcal wall were digested with 1 mg of lysozyme per ml instead of lysostaphin.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

List of the various plasmids constructed and tested in this study

PCR amplification of DNA fragments was carried out using a Perkin-Elmer apparatus (GeneAmp PCR System 9700; Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Conn.). Reactions were started with 100 ng of template DNA, 0.5 μM concentrations of specific primers (Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland), 0.3 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate in 10× PCR buffer, and 1.5 mM MgCl2, using 2 U of Taq DNA Polymerase (Life Technologies AG, Basel, Switzerland). The following conditions were applied during 30 cycles using the specific primer pairs listed in Table 2: (i) ori ColE1 was amplified from pBluescript (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) at 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min; (ii) the lactococcal promoters P23 and P59 (37) were amplified from L. lactis chromosome at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; (iii) luciferase was amplified from pFW5-luc (kindly provided by A. Podbielsky) at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 2 min; and (iv) clfA was amplified from S. aureus Newman chromosome at 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 3 min and 15 s.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

List of the primers used for PCR amplification of various DNA fragments

All constructions and plasmids listed in Table 1 were established usingE. coli as an intermediate host. Routine molecular biology techniques were performed by described methods (31). PCR fragments were purified with the QiaQuick purification Kits (Qiagen, GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and cloned into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wis.) prior to digestion with appropriate restriction enzymes (Table 2) (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Digested inserts corresponding to the various PCR fragments were then isolated on agarose gel and ligated to the corresponding recipient vectors (Table 1). Ligation was carried out overnight at 14°C using T4 DNA ligase (Life Technologies). Transformation of E. coli was performed as described earlier (31). Plasmids were extracted using the Wizard Plus Midiprep Kit (Promega Corporation). Then, 1 μg of each plasmid listed in Table1 previously amplified and purified from E. coli was used to transform L. lactis by electroporation as described elsewhere (10).

Luciferase assay.To test the functionality of the lactococcal P23 and P59 promoters in the expression vector pOri23 and pOri59 (Table 1), a luciferase (luc) gene was inserted downstream of these sequences, andluc expression was determined by measuring light emission by the microorganisms at various times of growth. In brief, 10-ml cultures of L. lactis and E. coli harboring the appropriate plasmids were incubated at 30 and 37°C, respectively, and monitored for growth with a spectrophotometer (Sequoia-Turner, Montainville, Calif.) at a wavelength of 620 nm (optical density at 620 nm). At several time points, 100-μl portions of cultures were removed and transferred into tubes containing 250 μl of 0.1 M sodium citrate (pH 5.5). A total of 50 μl of 1 mM beetle luciferine (Promega Corporation) diluted in 25 mM glycylglycine and 15 mM MgSO4(final concentrations) was automatically added by the autoinjector of the luminometer (Turner designs, Sunnyvale, Calif.). After 1 s of equilibration, light was measured during a 10-s period. Bacteria carrying empty pOri23 and pOri59 plasmids (Table 1) were used as negative control, and background was measured by light emission of sterile medium. All of the experiments were performed in triplicate.

SDS-PAGE and Western Blots.Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed by standard procedures using 6.5% acrylamide gels (13). Cell-wall-associated proteins were extracted from L. lactisand S. aureus as follows. Whole cells from 500-ml portions of exponential cultures were harvested by centrifugation (5,000 × g, 10 min, 4°C), washed twice with ice-cold 0.9 M NaCl, and resuspended in 5 ml of digestion buffer (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS], 1.1 M sucrose, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgCl2) in the presence of 100 μg of RNase (Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, Mo.) per ml, 50 μg of DNase (Sigma) per ml, and a cocktail of antiproteases (Complete; Roche Molecular). S. aureus peptidoglycan was solubilized with 100 μg of lysostaphin (Sigma) per ml and L. lactispeptidoglycan with 5 mg of lysozyme (Sigma) per ml plus 100 μg of mutanolysin (Sigma) per ml. The digestion reactions were allowed to proceed for 30 min at 37°C in a shaking incubator at 120 rpm before the mixtures were chilled and nonsoluble material was removed by centrifugation for 30 min at 10,000 × g. The supernatants (containing the solubilized walls) were recovered, and sucrose was removed by overnight dialysis against PBS at 4°C. The dialyzed material was allowed to equilibrate at room temperature. SDS (1% final concentration) was added to the samples before they were concentrated 10-fold using an Ultrafree-15 centrifugal filter device (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, Mass.). Protein concentrations were then determined using the BCA Method (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.). Ten-microgram protein samples of each preparation were separated by electrophoresis and transferred overnight (at 4°C) onto Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore) using a Mini-Trans-Blot electrophoretic transfer cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.) and a constant voltage of 35 V. The membranes were proceeded and incubated with a 1:500 dilution of anti-ClfA antibodies (kindly provided by T. Foster, Dublin, Ireland, and P. Vaudaux, Geneva, Switzerland) for 4 h as described elsewhere (18). After repeated rinsing in PBS– 0.2% Tween, immunoblots were incubated for 1 h with a 1:5,000 dilution of goat anti-rabbit antibodies coupled with alkaline phosphatase (Pierce). Bands were revealed by the BCIP (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indol-1-phosphate-p-toluidine)-nitroblue tetrazolium method (AP Development Reagent; Bio-Rad).

Measurement of bacterial clumping and adherence to solid-phase fibrinogen.Functional expression of staphylococcal clumping factor was determined using previously described methods (19) modified as follows. Bacteria from overnight cultures were centrifuged, washed twice with ice-cold 0.9 M NaCl, and resuspended in a 1/10 volume of the same solution. (i) For qualitative cell clumping, 20 μl of rabbit plasma (BioMérieux, Marcy L'Etoile, France) was mixed with 20 μl of washed bacteria on a glass slide, and clumping was assessed visually by immediate bacterial aggregation on the slide. (ii) Cell clumping was measured quantitatively in microtiter trays. Serial twofold dilutions of a 1-mg/ml solution of fibrinogen (Sigma) were made in PBS, and 100 μl was incubated with 20 μl of washed bacteria at 4°C. The reciprocal of the highest dilution of fibrinogen showing clumping after 24 h was recorded as the titer. Adherence to solid-phase fibrinogen was tested using a previously described method (39).

RESULTS

Construction of the E. coli-L. lactisshuttle-expression vectors.Two vectors (pOri23 and pOri59 in Table 1) were constructed using the following two-step strategy. First, the new shuttle vector pOri253 (Table 1 and Fig.1B) was designed to replicate in bothE. coli and L. lactis. The basic skeleton of pOri253 was the previously described L. lactis plasmid pIL253 (34) (Fig. 1A), carrying an ermAMmacrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin resistance gene. ermAMcan confer erythromycin resistance (Eryr) to both lactococci and E. coli (16). However, pIL253 does not replicate autonomously in E. coli. To circumvent this problem, pIL253 was equipped with the high-copy-numberoriColE1 replicon of pBluescript (Stratagene).oriColE1 was amplified by PCR using the primers presented in Table 2, and inserted at the XbaI restriction site of pIL253. The resulting shuttle vector pOri253 (Table1 and Fig. 1B) could successfully replicate in both E. coliand L. lactis.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Restriction map of the shuttle-expression vectors generated and utilized in this study (Table 1). The vectors were based on the original lactococcal plasmid pIL253 (A). This plasmid was previously reported as capable of replicating at high copy number and maintaining large pieces of DNA in lacotococci (34). pIL253 was used to construct the E. coli-L. lactis shuttle vector pOri253 (B) by inserting the OriColE1 replicon at theXbaI restriction site of its MCS. The shuttle vector pOri253 was further modified by inserting either of the lactococcal promotersP23 or P59 at theEcoRI/BamHI end of the MCS, resulting in the two lactococcal expression vectors pOri23 and pOri59 (C). Finally, these two shuttle expression vectors were used to subclone either the luciferase reporter gene or the staphylococcal clumping factor (clfA) gene to be expressed in lactococci (C).ermAM is the Eryr determinant of the original pIL253 plasmid, and repD and repE are the genes responsible for replication in lactococci.

Second, pOri253 was modified to obtain two types of expression vectors, with either of the two previously described lactococcal promoters:P23 or P59 (37). The two promoters were amplified by PCR from the L. lactis chromosome (see specific primers in Table 2) and then inserted at theEcoRI/BamHI site of pOri253 at one extreme of the multicloning site (MCS). This generated two new plasmids, named pOri23 and pOri59, respectively (Table 1 and Fig. 1C), that had the ability both to replicate in E. coli and lactococci and to drive gene expression in these lactococci (see below).

Functional characterization of the expression vectors with luciferase.To select the most efficient promoter, we used a promoterless firefly luciferase (luc) determinant as a reporter gene. luc was amplified by PCR from pFW5-luc and cloned along with its ribosome-binding site downstream of either the P23 or P59 promoters, at the BamHI/PstI site of plasmids pOri23 and pOri59. The resulting pOri23-luc and pOri59-lucplasmids (Fig. 1D) were transformed into E. coli andL. lactis, and light emission was determined in the recipients.

Figure 2 depicts light emission mediated by pOri23-luc as a function of growth expressed by the culture viable counts. No transcription activity was detected inE. coli, indicating that the lactococcal promoters were not functional in this organism (data not shown). In contrast, both promoters transcribed luc in lactococci. However, there was a substantial difference between the power of the two promoters. The luciferase activity was up to 10,000 times greater in bacteria carrying plasmid pOri23-luc than in those carrying pOri59-luc. Moreover, Fig. 2 indicates that the transcription activity of P23 was proportional to the bacterial density over the whole growth phase, thus behaving like a strong constitutive promoter. This was followed by a slight decrease in the stationary in phase. The plasmid containing the promoterP23 (pOri23 in Table 1) was selected for further experiments, and transformants were always used either in the logarithmic phase or in the early stationary phase of growth.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Bacterial growth and luciferase expression of L. lactis carrying the shuttle-expression pOri23 equipped with a luciferase reporter gene. Bacterial growth is expressed by the culture colony counts (CFU/milliliter). Luciferase expression is reported in relative light units (R.L.U.), as given by the luminometer. Luciferase expression was proportional to the number of viable counts over the whole growth phase. In stationary phase, a slight decrease (ca. 20%) in light expression was observed as compared to colony counts. Each datum point represents the mean ± the standard deviation of at least three individual determinations.

Functional expression of the S. aureus clumping factor A gene in lactococci.The clfA gene of S. aureus Newman was inserted at the EcoRI/SalI site of pOri253, using a strategy similar to that described above forluc. The primers for clfA amplification are described in Table 2. The recombinant plasmid pOri23-clfA(Fig. 1D) was then transformed into L. lactis cremoris 1363, and the expression of the clfA product was determined both by Western blot and by bacterial clumping in the presence of rabbit plasma.

For Western blot, solubilized staphylococcal and lactococcal walls were first submitted to SDS-PAGE separation as described above before being probed with anti-ClfA F(ab′)2 antibodies. Figure3 indicates that a similar 130-kDa protein corresponding to the size of ClfA (18) was detected by the antibodies in extracts from both S. aureus andL. lactis transformed with the pOri23-clfAvector. In contrast, no band corresponding to the ClfA protein was detected in extracts from lactococci carrying an empty plasmid. Thus,L. lactis transformed with pOri23-clfA expressed a new, unaltered ClfA protein at their surface.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Western blots of cell wall extracts of S. aureus Newman (Newman), L. lactis carrying the empty vector (pLI253), and L. lactis carrying the shuttle-expression vector pOri23-clfA, containing a copy of the staphylococcal clfA gene [ClfA (+)]. Bacteria in the late exponential phase were recovered, and their cell walls were isolated and solubilized as described in Materials and Methods. Solubilized walls were subjected to SDS-PAGE separation, transferred to PVDF membranes, and probed with anti-ClfA F(ad′)2 antibody fragments. For each sample, similar quantities (10 μg in 50 μl) of proteins were loaded on the gels. A band of ca. 130 kDa (arrow), corresponding the molecular mass of ClfA (18), appeared in wall extracts of both S. aureus Newman and L. lactis containing pOri23-clfA. In contrast, no band was observed in the wall extract of lactococci containing the empty vector. The double band in the S. aureus Newman extract might be due to interference of incompletely digested peptidoglycan moieties with migration in the electric field.

The functionality of the ClfA protein in lactococci was attested to by its ability to mediate both bacterial clumping in the presence of plasma or fibrinogen and binding to solid-phase fibrinogen. First, a qualitative cell clumping assay indicated that ClfA-producing lactococci containing the pOri23-clfa plasmid spontaneously clumped in the presence of rabbit plasma in a way similar to that ofS. aureus Newman. This was in contrast to the negative control mentioned above, which did not clump when suspended in plasma. Moreover, when clumping of the various test organisms was compared in a quantitative microtiter assay (see Materials and Methods), bothS. aureus Newman and ClfA-positive lactococci produced similar high clumping titers of 4,112. In contrast, ClfA-negative lactococci carrying either no vector or an empty vector did not clump, even at the highest fibrinogen concentration.

Second, Fig. 4 indicates that bothS. aureus Newman and ClfA-positive lactococci attached equally well to solid-phase fibrinogen. This finding was in striking contrast to the absence of adherence of the ClfA-negative control. Taken together, these results confirmed that L. lactiscontaining the pOri23-clfA plasmid expressed a new and functional 130-kDa ClfA protein that reacted with fibrinogen as the staphylococcal ClfA.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Binding of S. aureus Newman and ClfA-positive and negative lactococci to solid-phase fibrinogen. Microtiter plates were coated with serial twofold dilutions of a 1-mg/ml solution of fibrinogen (left to right), followed by incubation either with no cells (rows A) or with washed bacteria (rows B). Bound cells were then stained with crystal violet as described (39). Both S. aureus and ClfA-positive lactococci adhered to solid-phase fibrinogen in a similar way. In contrast, ClfA negative lactococci (L. lactis pIL253) did not.

DISCUSSION

Infection of host tissues by pathogenic microorganisms, such asS. aureus, is a multistep process beginning with the attachment of bacteria to specific-host-soluble or extracellular-matrix components. Cell-wall-associated factors responsible for this adhesion have long been considered as potential anti-infective targets and were studied in mutants of S. aureus defective in these specific derminants (1, 12, 22). However, this approach was limited because S. aureus harbors redundant surface adhesins that might overcome and compensate for the function of the missing or mutated factor.

To circumvent this problem, we sought to express S. aureuspathogenic factors in a less-virulent organism and eventually to test for a gain in infectivity related to this specific determinant. We hypothesized that if expression of a specific factor in lactococci resulted in a gain of function, e.g., increased infectivity, then this very factor is also likely to be important for staphylococcal pathogenesis, even though staphylococcal knockout mutants are not defective in infection models. Thus, we designed original molecular tools to express staphylococcal surface adhesins in lactococci. This recipient organism was chosen both because it is not known to carry adhesins to human tissues (6) and because it shares withS. aureus a common system to process and anchor cell-wall-associated proteins (32). Indeed, expression of heterologous surface proteins by lactococci was previously reported with other genes (29), thus supporting the rationale of the present approach. However, lactococci are not convenient organisms for “routine” molecular cloning and cannot easily be made competent for DNA transformation (10, 29). Therefore, a novel E. coli-L. lactis shuttle vector (pOri253 in Table 1) was designed, thus greatly facilitating the cloning of staphylococcal genes by using standard molecular techniques available for E. coli. The new shuttle vector was purposely based on the lactococcal plasmid pIL253, previously described as a high-copy-number lactococcal vector that could maintain large DNA fragments in this organism (34). Introduction of the oriColE1 replicon into pIL253 allowed this plasmid to replicate autonomously inE. coli. Moreover, the E. coli transformants could express the plasmid ermAM determinant and thus be selected for Eryr (16).

An additional task in generating these molecular tools was to ensure gene expression. For this purpose, two previously described lactococcal promoters (P23 and P59) (36) were amplified and inserted upstream of the plasmid's MCS. Both promoters were previously used to overexpress streptococcal proteins in L. lactis (29). In the present experiments, both promoters drove gene expression, but with very different efficiencies. Indeed, the plasmid carrying promoter P23 (pOri23) expressed luciferase constitutively at a level up to 10,000 times greater than the plasmid containing promoter P59 (pOri59). In contrast, no luciferase activity was detected in E. coli, probably because the promoter sequences required for RNA polymerase recognition in this organism are different from those in lactococci (21,24).

The fact that pOri23 ensured constitutive gene expression might have some advantages for the purpose of the present work. Indeed, in most bacteria pathogenic factors are tightly regulated using two-component regulatory systems (2). Factors are expressed when useful for the bacteria and downregulated when unnecessary or deleterious. Thus, the pathogenic contribution of a given factor might be mistakenly overemphasized or underestimated depending on whether the gene is expressed or not. Hence, expressing these factors constitutively in a surrogate bacterium might help discriminate between their intrinsic contribution when taken alone and the importance of their regulation in the staphylococcal context. Therefore, although not quite representative of the staphylococcal physiology, the present system should provide relevant complementary information.

A salient example of such a discrepancy was provided by recent experiments with S. aureus alpha-hemolysin (hla) mutants. Inactivation of hla decreased S. aureusinfectivity in rabbits with experimental endocarditis. Paradoxically, however, overexpression of hla on a multicopy plasmid also decreased infectivity in the model. In this case, overexpression ofhla was presumably deleterious to the bacterium via the microbicidal proteins released by alpha-hemolysin-activated platelets (3). Therefore, the same alpha-hemolysin could either increase or decrease infectivity depending on the experimental conditions.

Most interestingly, this apparent paradox finds its explanation in gene regulation. In wild-type S. aureus, hla is only expressed in the stationary phase but not during early bacterial growth (23). By that time, it is likely that bacteria are already embedded in the vegetation fibrin meshwork and remote from direct attack by platelet microbicidal proteins (PMPs). In contrast, organisms overexpressing alpha-hemolysin at an earlier stage of infection might be more directly exposed to the deleterious effect of PMPs (30). This emphasized the importance of obtaining results on constitutively expressed pathogenic genes, in order to understand better the implication of gene regulation in the infection process. Therefore, although not quite representative of the staphylococcal physiology, the present system should provide relevant complementary information.

The last requirement for establishing such a model in lactococci was to test whether the new pOri23 vector could indeed drive the expression of functional staphylococcal gene products in the L. lactisbackground. The S. aureus clumping factor A determinant was chosen as a model because it is a well-studied adhesin anchored to the staphylococcal wall (18). ClfA binds to fibrinogen and is responsible for bacterial clumping in the presence of plasma, thus providing a convenient in vitro functional assay (19). Moreover, ClfA was shown to mediate bacterial attachment to cardiac vegetations and significantly, yet marginally, contributed to virulence in rats with experimental endocarditis (22). Thus, ClfA provided (i) a test for the attachment of the protein to the cell wall, (ii) a method to assess its functionality, and (iii) a precedent for experimental infection.

The present results supported the two first issues, indicating that the ClfA protein could both be properly located in the cell wall fraction and mediate attachment to soluble and solid-phase fibrinogen. This will be important in assessing the gain of function conferred by ClfA and other genes in more sophisticated in vivo infectivity experiments, such as experimental endocarditis, that are planned for the future. Indeed, preliminary experiments indicated the validity of the concept. Thus, these new tools set the basis for a new strategy to study single staphylococcal pathogenic genes. It should help complement both classical knockout mutagenesis in staphylococci and modern means such as in vivo expression technology (15) and signature-tagged mutagenesis (20).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The present work was supported by grants 3200-044099.96/2, 31-52149.97, and 31-56689.99 from the Swiss National Fund for Scientific Research.

We thank Marlyse Giddey for outstanding technical support.

Notes

Editor: A. D. O'Brien

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 22 November 1999.
    • Returned for modification 14 January 2000.
    • Accepted 24 February 2000.
  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Baddour L. M.,
    2. Tayidi M. M.,
    3. Walker E.,
    4. McDevitt D.,
    5. Foster T. J.
    (1994) Virulence of coagulase-deficient mutants of Staphylococcus aureus in experimental endocarditis. J. Med. Microbiol. 41:259–263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. ↵
    1. Barrett J. F.,
    2. Hoch J. A.
    (1998) Two-component signal transduction as a target for microbial anti-infective therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:1529–1536.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bayer A. S.,
    2. Ramos M. D.,
    3. Menzies B. E.,
    4. Yeaman M. R.,
    5. Shen A. J.,
    6. Cheung A. L.
    (1997) Hyperproduction of alpha-toxin by Staphylococcus aureus results in paradoxically reduced virulence in experimental endocarditis: a host defense role for platelet microbicidal proteins. Infect. Immun. 65:4652–4660.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Dickinson R. B.,
    2. Nagel J. A.,
    3. McDevitt D.,
    4. Foster T. J.,
    5. Proctor R. A.,
    6. Cooper S. L.
    (1995) Quantitative comparison of clumping factor- and coagulase-mediated Staphylococcus aureus adhesion to surface-bound fibrinogen under flow. Infect. Immun. 63:3143–3150.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Duthie E. S.,
    2. Lorenz L. L.
    (1952) Staphylococcal coagulase: mode of action and antigenicity. J. Gen. Microbiol. 6:95–107.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. ↵
    1. Facklam R.,
    2. Elliott J. A.
    (1995) Identification, classification, and clinical relevance of catalase-negative, gram-positive cocci, excluding the streptococci and enterococci. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 8:479–495.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Gasson M. J.
    (1983) Plasmid complements of Streptococcus lactis NCDO 712 and other lactic streptococci after protoplast-induced curing. J. Bacteriol. 154:1–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Gasson M. J.,
    2. Lyndon Davies F.
    (1980) Prophage-cured derivatives of Streptococcus lactis and Streptococcus cremoris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 40:964–966.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Greene C.,
    2. McDevitt D.,
    3. Francois P.,
    4. Vaudaux P. E.,
    5. Lew D. P.,
    6. Foster T. J.
    (1995) Adhesion properties of mutants of Staphylococcus aureus defective in fibronectin-binding proteins and studies on the expression of fnb genes. Mol. Microbiol. 17:1143–1152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    1. Holo H.,
    2. Nes I. F.
    (1989) High-frequency transformation, by electroporation, of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris grown with glycine in osmotically stabilized media. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55:3119–3123.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Jonsson K.,
    2. Signas C.,
    3. Muller H. P.,
    4. Lindberg M.
    (1991) Two different genes encode fibronectin binding proteins in Staphylococcus aureus. The complete nucleotide sequence and characterization of the second gene. Eur. J. Biochem. 202:1041–1048.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. ↵
    1. Kuypers J. M.,
    2. Proctor R. A.
    (1989) Reduced adherence to traumatized rat heart valves by a low-fibronectin-binding mutant of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 57:2306–2312.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Laemmli U. K.
    (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. ↵
    1. Liang O. D.,
    2. Maccarana M.,
    3. Flock J. I.,
    4. Paulsson M.,
    5. Preissner K. T.,
    6. Wadstrom T.
    (1993) Multiple interactions between human vitronectin and Staphylococcus aureus. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1225:57–63.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Lowe A. M.,
    2. Beattie D. T.,
    3. Deresiewicz R. L.
    (1998) Identification of novel staphylococcal virulence genes by in vivo expression technology. Mol. Microbiol. 27:967–976.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    1. Macrina F. I.,
    2. Tobian J. A.,
    3. Jones K. R.,
    4. Evans R. P.,
    5. Clewell D. B.
    (1982) A cloning vector able to replicate in Escherichia coli and Streptococcus sanguis. Gene 19:345–353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    1. Marmur J.
    (1961) A procedure for isolation of desoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J. Mol. Biol. 3:208–218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    1. McDevitt D.,
    2. Francois P.,
    3. Vaudaux P.,
    4. Foster T. J.
    (1994) Molecular characterization of the clumping factor (fibrinogen receptor) of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 11:237–248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. ↵
    1. McDevitt D.,
    2. Vaudaux P.,
    3. Foster T. J.
    (1992) Genetic evidence that bound coagulase of Staphylococcus aureus is not clumping factor. Infect. Immun. 60:1514–1523.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Mei J. M.,
    2. Nourbakhsh F.,
    3. Ford C. W.,
    4. Holden D. W.
    (1997) Identification of Staphylococcus aureus virulence genes in a murine model of bacteraemia using signature-tagged mutagenesis. Mol. Microbiol. 26:399–407.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    1. Moran C. P. Jr.,
    2. Lang N.,
    3. LeGrice S. F.,
    4. Lee G.,
    5. Stephens M.,
    6. Sonenshein A. L.,
    7. Pero J.,
    8. Losick R.
    (1982) Nucleotide sequences that signal the initiation of transcription and translation in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Gen Genet. 186:339–346.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. ↵
    1. Moreillon P.,
    2. Entenza J. M.,
    3. Francioli P.,
    4. McDevitt D.,
    5. Foster T. J.,
    6. Francois P.,
    7. Vaudaux P.
    (1995) Role of Staphylococcus aureus coagulase and clumping factor in pathogenesis of experimental endocarditis. Infect. Immun. 63:4738–4743.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Morfeldt E.,
    2. Taylor D.,
    3. von Gabain A.,
    4. Arvidson S.
    (1995) Activation of alpha-toxin translation in Staphylococcus aureus by the trans-encoded antisense RNA, RNAIII. EMBO J. 14:4569–4577.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    1. Morrison D. A.,
    2. Jaurin B.
    (1990) Streptococcus pneumoniae possesses canonical Escherichia coli (sigma 70) promoters. Mol. Microbiol. 4:1143–1152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    1. Ni Eidhin D.,
    2. Perkins S.,
    3. Francois P.,
    4. Vaudaux P.,
    5. Hook M.,
    6. Foster T. J.
    (1998) Clumping factor B (ClfB), a new surface-located fibrinogen-binding adhesin of Staphylococcus aureus. Mol. Microbiol. 30:245–257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    1. Patti J. M.,
    2. Hook M.
    (1994) Microbial adhesins recognizing extracellular matrix macromolecules. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 6:752–758.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    1. Patti J. M.,
    2. Jonsson H.,
    3. Guss B.,
    4. Switalski L. M.,
    5. Wiberg K.,
    6. Lindberg M.,
    7. Hook M.
    (1992) Molecular characterization and expression of a gene encoding a Staphylococcus aureus collagen adhesin. J. Biol. Chem. 267:4766–4772.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Phonimdaeng P. O.,
    2. Reilly M.,
    3. Nowlan P.,
    4. Bramley A. J.,
    5. Foster T. J.
    (1990) The coagulase of Staphylococcus aureus 8325-4. Sequence analysis and virulence of site-specific coagulase-deficient mutants. Mol. Microbiol. 4:393–404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    1. Piard J. C.,
    2. Hautefort I.,
    3. Fischetti V. A.,
    4. Ehrlich S. D.,
    5. Fons M.,
    6. Gruss A.
    (1997) Cell wall anchoring of the Streptococcus pyogenes M6 protein in various lactic acid bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 179:3068–3072.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Proctor R. A.,
    2. van Langevelde P.,
    3. Kristjansson M.,
    4. Maslow J. N.,
    5. Arbeit R. D.
    (1995) Persistent and relapsing infections associated with small-colony variants of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 20:95–102.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y).
  32. ↵
    1. Schneewind O.,
    2. Mihaylova-Petkov D.,
    3. Model P.
    (1993) Cell wall sorting signals in surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria. EMBO J. 12:4803–4811.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    1. Signas C.,
    2. Raucci G.,
    3. Jonsson K.,
    4. Lindgren P. E.,
    5. Anantharamaiah G. M.,
    6. Hook M.,
    7. Lindberg M.
    (1989) Nucleotide sequence of the gene for a fibronectin-binding protein from Staphylococcus aureus: use of this peptide sequence in the synthesis of biologically active peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:699–703.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Simon D.,
    2. Chopin A.
    (1988) Construction of a vector plasmid family and its use for molecular cloning in Streptococcus lactis. Biochimie 70:559–566.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Terzaghi B. E.,
    2. Sandine W. E.
    (1975) Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Antimicrob. Agents Chemther. 29:807–813.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. van der Vossen J. M.,
    2. van der Lelie D.,
    3. Venema G.
    (1987) Isolation and characterization of Streptococcus cremoris Wg2-specific promoters. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53:2452–2457.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Waldvogel F. A.
    (1995) Staphylococcus aureus (including toxic shock syndrome). in Principles and practice of infectious diseases, eds Mandel G. L., Bennett J. E., Dolin R. (Churchill Livingstone, New York, N.Y), 4th ed. 1:1754–1777.
  38. ↵
    1. Westerlund B.,
    2. Korhonen T. K.
    (1993) Bacterial proteins binding to the mammalian extracellular matrix. Mol. Microbiol. 9:687–694.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. ↵
    1. Wolz C.,
    2. McDevitt D.,
    3. Foster T. J.,
    4. Cheung A. L.
    (1996) Influence of agr on fibrinogen binding in Staphylococcus aureus Newman. Infect. Immun. 64:3142–3147.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Expression of Staphylococcus aureusClumping Factor A in Lactococcus lactis subsp.cremoris Using a New Shuttle Vector
Yok-Ai Que, Jacques-Antoine Haefliger, Patrick Francioli, Philippe Moreillon
Infection and Immunity Jun 2000, 68 (6) 3516-3522; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.6.3516-3522.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Expression of Staphylococcus aureusClumping Factor A in Lactococcus lactis subsp.cremoris Using a New Shuttle Vector
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
Share
Expression of Staphylococcus aureusClumping Factor A in Lactococcus lactis subsp.cremoris Using a New Shuttle Vector
Yok-Ai Que, Jacques-Antoine Haefliger, Patrick Francioli, Philippe Moreillon
Infection and Immunity Jun 2000, 68 (6) 3516-3522; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.6.3516-3522.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522