Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PATHOGENESIS

Identification of Three Essential Regulatory Gene Loci Governing Expression of Staphylococcus epidermidis Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin and Biofilm Formation

Dietrich Mack, Holger Rohde, Sabine Dobinsky, Joachim Riedewald, Max Nedelmann, Johannes K.-M. Knobloch, Holger-A. Elsner, Hubert H. Feucht
Dietrich Mack
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holger Rohde
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sabine Dobinsky
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joachim Riedewald
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Max Nedelmann
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johannes K.-M. Knobloch
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holger-A. Elsner
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hubert H. Feucht
Institut für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Immunologie, Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.7.3799-3807.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The formation of adherent multilayered biofilms embedded into a glycocalyx represents an essential factor in the pathogenesis ofStaphylococcus epidermidis biomaterial-related infections. Using biofilm-producing S. epidermidis 1457 and transposon Tn917 carried on plasmid pTV1ts, we isolated nine isogenic biofilm-negative transposon mutants. Transduction byS. epidermidis phage 71 was used to prove the genetic linkage of transposon insertions and altered phenotypes. Mapping of the different transposon insertions by Southern hybridization and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis indicated that these were inserted in four unlinked genetic loci. According to their phenotypes, including quantitative differences in biofilm production in different growth media, in the amount of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) produced, in the hemagglutination titers, and in the altered colony morphology, the mutants could be separated into four phenotypic classes corresponding with the genetic classes. Synthesis of PIA was not detectable with class I and II mutants, whereas the amount of PIA produced reflected the residual degree of biofilm production of class III and IV mutants in different growth media. Chromosomal DNA flanking the transposon insertions of five class I mutants was cloned and sequenced, and the insertions were mapped to different locations of icaADBC, representing the synthetic genes for PIA. Expression of icaADBC from a xylose-dependent promoter in the different isogenic mutant classes reconstituted biofilm production in all mutants. In a Northern blot analysis no icaADBC-specific transcripts were observed in RNA isolated from mutants of classes II, III, and IV. Apparently, in addition to icaADBC, three other gene loci have a direct or indirect regulatory influence on expression of the synthetic genes for PIA on the level of transcription.

Today, coagulase-negative staphylococci, mostly strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis, represent the most frequent causes of nosocomial sepsis and are the most prominent organisms responsible for infections of implanted medical devices (1, 30, 38, 40, 41). In vitro, a proportion of S. epidermidis strains produce a macroscopically visible, adherent biofilm on test tubes or tissue culture plates, with a morphology in scanning electron micrographs very similar to that of infected intravascular catheters (3, 4, 14). This phenotype is now regularly referred to as biofilm formation, whereas the somewhat ambiguous term “slime production” was used earlier (13, 15, 16).

The molecular mechanisms leading to biofilm formation of S. epidermidis have attracted considerable interest in recent years. Biofilm formation may be divided into two phases. First, a complex process involving multiple physicochemical, protein, and polysaccharide factors leads to primary attachment of bacterial cells to a polymer surface (9, 11, 15, 16, 26-28, 39, 44). In the second phase, the attached bacteria proliferate and accumulate in a multilayered biofilm. Using transposon mutagenesis our group identified a linear homoglycan composed primarily ofN-acetylglucosamine in β-1,6-glycosidic linkages containing deacetylated amino groups and succinate and phosphate substituents (17, 19). This polysaccharide is referred to as polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA), which is functional in cell-to-cell adhesion and is essential for biofilm accumulation of most clinical S. epidermidis strains (17-19, 21, 22). In addition, PIA is essential for hemagglutination of erythrocytes byS. epidermidis (5, 20, 29, 31). The gene products of the icaADBC locus of S. epidermidis have enzymatic activity, which leads to synthesis of PIA in vivo and in vitro (6, 10, 20). Recently, it was demonstrated using a well-characterized isogenic biofilm-negative transposon mutant 1457-M10 in two relevant animal foreign-body infection models, that a functional icaADBC locus and the ability to produce PIA is essential for the pathogenesis of S. epidermidisbiomaterial-related infections (19, 25, 32, 33).

In the present study we extend our genetic analysis of the mechanisms of S. epidermidis biofilm formation. Our results indicate that several independent genetic loci are essential for PIA synthesis and biofilm formation by S. epidermidis.

(Part of this work will appear in the doctoral theses of H.R., J.R., M.N., and J.K.-M.K., Universitäts-Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.)

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains.The biofilm-producing S. epidermidis 1457, its variant cured of an endogenous plasmid,S. epidermidis 1457c, and biofilm-producing S. epidermidis 9142, as well as the isogenic biofilm-negative mutants M10 and M11 and the biofilm-negative transductant 1457-M10, have been described (20, 21, 25). Staphylococcus carnosuscontaining the recombinant plasmids pCN27 (10) or pTXicaADBC (6), which contains the clonedicaADBC locus under control of its own or a xylose-inducible promoter, were kindly provided by Friedrich Götz (University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany). S. aureus WBG4883 carrying the conjugative plasmid pWBG636 was kindly provided by W. B. Grubb (Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia) (42, 43). Escherichia coli MC1061 (kindly provided by J. A. Gutierrez, Department of Oral Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville) was used as a host for cloning Tn917 insertion sites in plasmid pBluescript II SK (7). The relevant plasmids and antibiotic resistance markers of these strains are listed in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Strains and plasmids

Transposon mutagenesis.Transposon mutagenesis was carried out at the nonpermissive temperature of plasmid pTV1ts usingS. epidermidis 1457c(pTV1ts) as described previously (19, 25).

Phage transduction.Phage transduction using S. epidermidis phages 48 or 71, kindly provided by V. T. Rosdahl, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark, was performed as described previously (25). For transduction of chromosomal markers the phage lysates were UV irradiated as described elsewhere (19, 25).

Mobilization of pTXicaADBC into S. epidermidis by coconjugation and transduction. S. carnosus carrying plasmid pTXicaADBC and S. aureus WBG4883 were mated on membrane filters as described earlier (19). Donor and recipient strains were grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, England) overnight at 37°C with shaking, and 3 ml of recipient and 1 ml of donor cultures were filtered onto 0.45-μm (pore-size) nitrocellulose filters. These were incubated on BHI agar at 37°C for 20 h. Bacterial growth was plated on peptone-yeast (PY) agar (1.0% peptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% NaCl, 0.1% glucose, 1.5% agar; pH 7.5) while selecting for pTXicaADBC (tetracycline, 10 μg/ml) and for pWBG636 (gentamicin, 8 μg/ml) at 37°C. Transconjugants were purified on selective PY agar plates and were mated with S. epidermidis9142 on membrane filters. Bacteria were plated on PY agar selecting for pTXicaADBC with tetracycline (10 μg/ml) and forS. epidermidis 9142 with 2 μg of ciprofloxacin per ml at 37°C. A transconjugant clone with the expected resistance pattern was used to move pTXicaADBC into different recipients usingS. epidermidis phages 48 and 71 (25).

PFGE, DNA isolation, and Southern blot hybridization.Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed essentially as described using SmaI for cleavage of DNA and a CHEF-DR II system (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) for the analysis of resulting fragments (36). Phage lambda DNA concatemers were used as molecular weight markers. Chromosomal and plasmid DNA was isolated as previously described (19). DNA was digested with restriction enzymes under conditions suggested by the manufacturer (Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany). DNA fragments were separated on 0.5% agarose gels in Tris-borate buffer (34). Alkaline capillary blotting and hybridization with [32P]dCTP-labeled probes were performed as described previously (19). The blots were exposed to Kodak X-Omat X-ray films.

Cloning of Tn917 containing DNA fragments of transposon mutants.Tn917-containing restriction fragments were cloned directly in E. coli MC1061 using pBluescript II SK (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.) as a vector and selecting ampicillin-resistant (100 μg/ml) transformants. Positive clones were transferred using soft velvet to erythromycin-containing Luria-Bertani agar plates (300 μg/ml) directly selecting for inserts expressing the erythromycin resistance gene of Tn917(7). Sequences of the transposon insertion sites of the mutants were obtained using oligonucleotides 5′-GGC CTT GAA ACA TTG GTT TAG TGG G-3′ and 5′-CTC ACA ATA GAG AGA TGT CAC CG-3′ complementary to the 5′- and 3′-junctions of Tn917 (37). DNA sequence analysis was performed using the Sequenase version 2.0 kit (U.S. Biochemicals) as described earlier (20).

Isolation of RNA and Northern blot analysis.An overnight culture of the respective strains was diluted 1:100 into fresh, prewarmed tryptic soy broth (Oxoid) TSBOxoid and then grown into the mid-exponential-growth phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] of ∼3.0). Total bacterial RNA was isolated by the FastPrep system (Bio 101, Vista, Calif.) as described earlier (2). Then, 10 μg of total RNA was analyzed on a 1% agarose-formaldehyde gel in MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) running buffer (20 mM MOPS, 5 mM sodium acetate, 1 mM EDTA; pH 7.0). RNA was blotted onto Zeta-Probe blotting membranes (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany) and fixed to the membrane by baking at 80°C for 30 min. Hybridization with a 32P-labeled icaC-specific (5′-GAA ATA GCC ATA CCA TTG TCC-3′) oligonucleotide was performed at 52°C overnight in hybridization buffer containing 7% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0), 10× Denhardt solution, 5× SSC (standard saline citrate), 10% dextran sulfate, and 100 μg of denatured herring sperm DNA per ml. The membranes were then washed at 52°C for 30 min in 5% SDS, 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0), 10× Denhardt solution, and 3× SSC, followed by 1 h in 1× SSC–1% SDS. The membranes were exposed to Kodak X-Omat X-ray films.

Adherence assay for measurement of biofilm production by S. epidermidis.Biofilm production by S. epidermidisstrains grown in Trypticase soy broth (TSBBBL; Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md.) and TSBOxoid (Oxoi, Basingstoke, England), respectively, was determined with a semiquantitative adherence assay using 96-well tissue culture plates (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) as described previously (4, 21).

Preparation of bacterial extracts and quantitation of PIA concentration.Bacterial extracts of S. epidermidisstrains grown in TSBBBL or TSBOxoid on plastic tissue culture plates were prepared by sonication (21). The concentration of PIA in bacterial extracts was determined by a specific coagglutination assay (19-21).

Hemagglutination.Hemagglutination was assessed as described previously (20, 29). Bacteria were grown in TSBBBL in plastic tissue culture dishes for 22 h at 37°C (20). The medium was aspirated, and cells were scraped from the surface into 12 ml of phosphate-buffered saline. After passage through a 23-gauge needle, the bacterial suspension was adjusted to an OD578 of 1.0. The hemagglutination assay was performed with 96-well (U-shaped) microtiter plates (Greiner, Nürtingen, Germany) using sheep erythrocytes (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany) as described earlier (20, 29).

RESULTS

Isolation of biofilm-negative transposon mutants.Using the biofilm-producing S. epidermidis 1457c cured of a cryptic plasmid of S. epidermidis 1457 and the temperature-sensitive plasmid pTV1ts, nine transposon mutants displaying altered biofilm production were isolated (25). For all mutants, genetic linkage of the observed phenotypic changes and the respective transposon insertions was demonstrated by transduction using S. epidermidis phage 71. Similar phenotypes and hybridization patterns using a Tn917-specific probe were detected with all mutants and their respective transductants (data not shown).

Genetic analysis of transposon insertion sites. (i) Characterization of isogenic biofilm-negative mutants by Southern blot hybridization and PFGE.Southern blot hybridization ofEcoRI-cleaved chromosomal DNA of the mutants using theicaADBC-specific insert of plasmid pCN27 as a probe revealed single insertions of Tn917 into theica-specific 3-kb fragment of S. epidermidis 1457 in mutants M13 and M24, whereas in mutants M21, M22, and M23 Tn917 inserted into the 6.4-kb EcoRI fragment specific for the icaADBC locus (Fig.1A). In contrast, in mutants M12, M15, M17, and M19 Tn917 insertions were apparently not related to the icaADBC locus, since no fragment size alterations of the two ica-specific EcoRI fragments were observed (Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Chromosomal DNA of the wild-type biofilm-producingS. epidermidis 1457 and the isogenic biofilm-negative Tn917 mutants M10, M13, and M21 to M24 (class I), M12 (class II), M15 and M19 (class III), and M17 (class IV) was digested withEcoRI. Fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. Autoradiograms of a Southern blot hybridized with theicaADBC-specific XbaI-HindIII fragment of plasmid pCN27 (A) or a Tn917-specific probe (B) are shown. The discrepant intensities in panel A of the 6.4- and 3.0-kb fragments and their respective variants containing Tn917insertions probably result from the fact that more than two-thirds of the icaADBC-specific probe used covered the smaller fragment, whereas the remainder hybridized to the larger fragment.

Hybridization with a Tn917-specific probe revealed that all mutants contained single insertions of Tn917 (Fig. 1B). Two identical 14.5-kb EcoRI-fragments were labeled in mutants M15 and M19, suggesting that the insertion sites of these mutants could be closely linked. Using chromosomal DNA of mutants M12 and M17, insertion of Tn917 into EcoRI fragments of 6.0 and 9.8 kb was detected.

Analysis of the insertion sites of the mutants by PFGE revealed insertion of Tn917 in a 60-kb SmaI fragment with mutants M13 and M22 (class I), a 40-kb SmaI fragment with mutant M12 (class II), a 97-kb SmaI fragment with mutants M15 and M19 (class III), and a 40-kb SmaI fragment for mutant M17 (class IV; Fig. 2). Mobility differences of fragments resulting from Tn917 insertions can be observed by comparison with neighboring lanes with mutants of different classes in the ethidium bromide-stained gel, as indicated in the left panel of Fig. 2. In the case of mutants M12 (class II) and M17 (class IV), insertions occurred in two different fragments of approximately 40 kb, which are not separated in the wild type and mutants of classes I and III, resulting in a relatively intense band. Tn917 insertion in mutant M12 (class II) leads to decreased mobility of that double band, probably by insertion into the smaller of the two comigrating fragments. In mutant M17 (class IV) a distinct double band is observed, probably resulting from insertion of Tn917 into the larger of the two comigrating fragments. These studies indicate that in mutants M13 and M21 through M24, the insertion of Tn917 occurred within or near theicaADBC locus, whereas the transposon insertions of the other four mutants represent gene loci, which influence biofilm formation of S. epidermidis differently from theicaADBC locus.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Chromosomal DNA of biofilm-producing S. epidermidis 1457 (wt) and transposon mutants M12 (class II), M13 and M22 (class I), M15 and M19 (class III), and M17 (class IV) were cleaved by SmaI. Fragments were separated by PFGE. (Left panel) Ethidium bromide-stained gel. Fragments with altered mobility due to Tn917 insertions in the different mutant classes are indicated. (Right panel) Autoradiogram after hybridization of the Southern blot with a probe specific for Tn917.

(ii) Mapping of the different transposon insertion sites.Using ica-specific probes and twoAvaI fragments corresponding to the 5′ (erm) and the 3′ junctions of Tn917, preliminary mapping of the transposon insertions of the different mutant classes was performed using restriction enzymes XbaI,HindIII, and BglII, which all have cleavage sites within the Tn917 sequence (Fig.3). Apparently, Tn917 inserted at different locations of the icaADBC locus with the identical transcriptional direction in mutants M13, M21, M22, and M23, but not with mutant M24, where Tn917 inserted in a direction opposite to the transcriptional direction of icaADBC. Mapping of the mutants M12, M15, M19, and M17 confirmed the close linkage of Tn917 insertions in mutants M15 and M19. Due to the different restriction fragment patterns observed by mapping of mutants M12 and M17, linkage of the transposon insertions of these two mutants is highly unlikely, as already indicated from the PFGE results. Apparently, in addition to Tn917 insertions in the icaADBC locus, three additional classes of unlinked insertions of Tn917 into the chromosome of S. epidermidis 1457 lead to a biofilm-negative phenotype.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Preliminary genetic map of transposon insertions of the different mutant classes. H, HindIII; X,XbaI; B, BglII; E, EcoRI.erm indicates the direction of transcription of theerm gene of Tn917.

(iii) Identification of Tn917 insertion sites of class I biofilm-negative mutants by nucleotide sequencing.The chromosomal EcoRI fragments of the biofilm-negative S. epidermidis transposon mutants M13 and M24 containing the entire transposon Tn917 were cloned in E. coli MC1061. For mutants M22 and M23 chromosomalEcoRI-SalI fragments and for mutant M21 aHindIII-SalI fragment containing the 5′ end of Tn917, including the erm gene, were cloned inE. coli. Sequence analysis revealed that mutants M13 and M24 had their insertions in the coding sequence of the icaAgene of the icaADBC locus, which contains synthetic genes for PIA (Table 2). In contrast, in the biofilm-negative mutants M21, M22, and M23, Tn917 was inserted at different sites within the coding sequence oficaC (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Nucleotide sequences flanking Tn917 insertions of class I biofilm-negative S. epidermidistransposon mutants

Phenotypic characterization of the transposon mutants. (i) Biofilm production.According to their differential degree of biofilm production in TSBOxoid and TSBBBL and their colony morphology, the isogenic transposon mutants could be assigned to four phenotypic classes, which clearly correspond to the genetic classes defined by the different insertion sites of Tn917. All mutants were completely biofilm negative in TSBOxoid. In TSBBBL all class I mutants were completely biofilm negative with the exception of mutant M21, in which Tn917inserted at the extreme end of icaC, apparently resulting in a low residual enzymatic activity. Mutant M12 (class II) was also completely biofilm negative in TSBBBL. Mutants M15 and M19 (class III) displayed quantitatively reduced biofilm production in TSBBBL, which often was near the cutoff value of the adherence assay, whereas M17 (class IV) nearly reached wild-type levels of biofilm production in TSBBBL (Table3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Phenotypic properties of biofilm-negative S. epidermidis transposon mutants

(ii) PIA production.All mutants of class I did not detectably produce PIA in TSBOxoid and TSBBBL, except for mutant M21, which corresponds to the residual biofilm production of M21 in TSBBBL (Table 3). Mutant M12 (class II) also did not produce any PIA in either medium. Class III mutants did not produce PIA in TSBOxoid but had 32-fold-reduced PIA titers compared to the wild type in TSBBBL. The class IV mutant (M17) produced eightfold- and fourfold-reduced PIA titers in TSBOxoid and TSBBBL, respectively (Table 3).

(iii) Hemagglutination.PIA was identified as the hemagglutinin of S. epidermidis (5, 20). In TSBBBL the isogenic transposon mutants of class I were all hemagglutination negative, with the exception of mutant M21, which also displayed residual PIA synthesis (Table 3). Mutant M12 (class II) was also completely hemagglutination negative (Table 3). Mutants M15 and M19 (class III) displayed reduced hemagglutination titers proportional to their reduced synthesis of PIA (Table 3). In contrast, the hemagglutination titers displayed by mutant M17 (class IV) were significantly lower, as would have been expected from the amount of PIA synthesized by this mutant (Table 3).

(iv) Changes of colony morphology.Class II and class III mutants displayed gray to translucent colonies on blood agar compared to the white colonies of the wild-type strain and the mutants of classes I and IV (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Colonial morphology of biofilm-producing S. epidermidis 1457 (A), mutant M13 (class I) (B), M12 (class II) (C), and M15 (class III) (D) on blood agar plates.

(v) Expression of icaADBC using a xylose-inducible promoter in biofilm-negative mutants of different classes.Using the conjugative plasmid pWBG636 the recombinant plasmid pTXicaADBC containing the icaADBC locus cloned under the control of a xylose-inducible promoter (6) was mobilized from S. carnosus carrying pTXicaADBC into the biofilm-producing S. epidermidis 9142. Strain 9142(pTXicaADBC) with the expected antibiotic resistance markers was used as a donor for the production of transducing phage 48 lysates. Using this lysate the isogenic biofilm-negative transposon mutants M13 (class I), M12 (class II), M15 (class III), and M17 (class IV) were transduced with plasmid pTXicaADBC. All transductants had the expected antibiotic resistance profile (data not shown). Using TSBOxoid as the growth medium, mutant M13 containing a Tn917 insertion at nucleotide 85 of the icaAgene was complemented to a biofilm-producing phenotype in the presence of 4% xylose, whereas in the absence of xylose this strain displayed a completely biofilm-negative phenotype (Table4). Similarly, in TSBOxoid lacking xylose the transductants of the isogenic mutants of classes II, III, and IV were completely biofilm negative. In contrast, in the presence of 4% xylose all of these mutants expressed a strongly biofilm-producing phenotype, indicating that the genetic defect resulting from the Tn917 insertions in these different mutant classes can be complemented, whenicaADBC is expressed from an independent promoter (Table4). Apparently, the mutations of the isogenic mutants of classes II, III, and IV directly or indirectly suppress expression oficaADBC from its own promoter.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 4.

Complementation of biofilm formation in different biofilm-negative mutant classes by icaADBC expressed by a xylose-dependent promoter

(vi) Transcription of icaADBC in biofilm-negative mutants of different classes.To directly evaluate the effect of the different Tn917 insertions of the biofilm-negative mutants of classes II, III, and IV on transcription of theicaADBC locus, RNA was prepared in mid-exponential-growth phase from mutants M12, M15, and M17 and from wild-type S. epidermidis 1457. AnicaADBC-specific transcript (ca. 3.6 kb) was detected in RNA prepared from the biofilm-producing S. epidermidis 1457 grown in TSBOxoid. In contrast, anicaADBC-specific transcript was not detected with any of the mutants M12 (class II), M15 (class III), or M17 (class IV) (Fig.5).

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Transcription of icaADBC in biofilm-negative class II, III, and IV mutants. Total RNA was extracted from S. epidermidis 1457 (lane 1) and mutants M12 (class II; lane 2), M15 (class III; lane 3), and M17 (class IV; lane 4) grown into the mid-exponential-growth phase in TSBOxoid. AnicaC-specific oligonucleotide probe was used in Northern hybridization, and an autoradiogram is shown.

DISCUSSION

In the present study we have isolated nine isogenic biofilm-negative Tn917 insertion mutants with Tn917 insertions in four unlinked chromosomal loci. The resulting transposon mutants can be separated into four genetic classes according to the preliminary chromosomal mapping of their respective Tn917 insertions. These genetic classes are reflected by phenotypic differences observed with the mutants, which include differences in the quantity of biofilm formation and PIA production in TSBBBL or TSBOxoid and altered colony morphology (Table 3, Fig. 4).

The five mutants of class I have Tn917 insertions within the coding region of the icaADBC locus. Mutants M13 and M24 inactivate icaA by insertion at nucleotides 85 and 331 of the icaA gene, closely resembling the isogenic mutants M10 and M11 with insertions at nucleotides 87 and 1031 of theicaA gene (19, 20). In mutants M22 and M23 the icaC gene is inactivated at nucleotides 154 and 443 of the icaC gene. All of these insertions lead to complete inactivation of PIA synthesis. In contrast, the insertion of mutant M21 is located at nucleotide 1001 of the icaC gene, only 67 nucleotides from the stop codon of icaC, allowing residual enzymatic activity of the icaADBC operon leading to low-level PIA synthesis and biofilm formation in TSBBBL. These observations indicate that a correct sequence of the last 21 amino acids of IcaC is essential for full functional activity for PIA synthesis.

No Tn917 insertions in icaB or icaDwere noted in our study. This could simply result from the lack of insertion sites for Tn917 in these genes. However, this could also mean that these two genes are not essential for PIA synthesis and biofilm formation. This could be anticipated foricaB since in an in vitro-reconstituted reaction the synthesis of PIA clearly depended on the presence of IcaA, IcaD, and IcaC, but not on IcaB (6). In addition, it was reported that expression of icaADC without icaB led to cell clustering of S. carnosus as in S. carnosusexpressing icaADBC and synthesizing PIA (6). In contrast to these observations, it was reported that the insertion of insertion sequence IS256 into icaB and a frame shift mutation of icaB led to a biofilm-negative phenotype (10, 45).

We isolated four additional isogenic biofilm-negative transposon mutants with insertions unlinked to theicaADBC locus. These insertions can be separated into genetic classes II, III, and IV, which correspond also with phenotypic differences of these mutants. There are several possible mechanisms which could lead to impaired PIA synthesis and biofilm formation of these mutants.

First, these gene loci could be necessary for the synthesis of an essential precursor for PIA synthesis. Since PIA is a homoglycan synthesized primarily of N-acetylglucosamine (17), this is unlikely as this sugar is an essential constituent of the peptidoglycan and therefore necessary for bacterial cell proliferation. However, PIA contains additional modifications, like the deacetylation of the amino groups, and the transfer of phosphate and succinate groups (17) and inactivation of the respective gene loci of mutants of class II to IV could interfere with these modifications. Second, some of these mutations could interfere with the transport of PIA outside the cell and therefore inhibit synthesis of the polysaccharide. Third, the respective gene loci could interfere with the expression of the icaADBC locus at the level of transcription.

To differentiate between these possibilities, we expressedicaADBC from a xylose-inducible promoter by transfer of the recombinant plasmid pTXicaADBC into mutants of classes I (M13), II (M12), III (M15), and IV (M17). All mutants containing the recombinant plasmid still had a biofilm-negative phenotype in the absence of xylose. However, in the presence of xylose the icaA insertion mutant M13 was complemented to a biofilm-producing phenotype as expected, indicating that the recombinant icaADBC locus of pTXicaADBCwas still functional after the genetic manipulations of conjugative mobilization and transduction. Interestingly, in the presence of xylose the mutants M12, M15, and M17 containing pTXicaADBCproduced biofilm. This clearly rules out the possibility that the respective gene loci of the mutants of classes II to IV encode functions necessary as precursors for PIA synthesis or are responsible for the transport of the polysaccharide. Since expression oficaADBC in trans from an independent promoter led to biofilm formation in these mutants, the inactivated genes apparently influence expression of icaADBC in a regulatory way by either directly or indirectly modulating transcription of icaADBC. This was confirmed directly since transcription of icaADBC was not detected in mutants M12, M15, and M17 compared to the wild-type S. epidermidis 1457 in the mid-exponential-growth phase. Apparently, functional activity of all of the inactivated genes in these mutants is essential for biofilm formation in TSBOxoid whereas in TSBBBL the inactivated gene of mutant M17 seems to be dispensable for biofilm formation and PIA synthesis. In contrast to the lack of biofilm formation in TSBOxoid, it was observed over time that, although biofilm formation of mutant M17 in different lots of TSBBBL varied between reaching an optical density similar to that of the wild type and being significantly reduced, a biofilm always formed. At present it is unknown which specific constituents of these complex media are relevant for the differential expression of biofilm formation by the different isogenic mutants.

Several other biofilm-negative mutants have been described previously. Tn917 mutant Mut1 is impaired in primary attachment due to a deletion in the gene of the major autolysin atlE of S. epidermidis (9). Since this mutant still produces PIA in quantities similar to that of the wild-type strain O-47, mutant Mut1 can be easily differentiated from the mutants isolated in the present study (5, 8).

Mutant M7, obtained by chemical mutagenesis of S. epidermidis RP62A, is impaired in the accumulative phase of biofilm production (35). This mutant does not produce a 140-kDa accumulation associated protein (AAP) believed to be responsible for the observed defect in accumulation (12). However, since the mutant still produces PIA in quantities similar to those with the wild type (12) (D. Mack and C. de Grahl, unpublished results), it seems highly unlikely that AAP has a regulatory effect on the expression of icaADBC and that it is functionally related to mutants described in this study. In addition, AAP appears in the protein fraction secreted from the cells (12). It is therefore difficult to assume how AAP could directly influence expression of icaADBC.

Mutant M187-sn3 is a biofilm-negative transposon mutant, which is impaired in the synthesis of a polysaccharide referred to as capsular polysaccharide/adhesin (PS/A) (24). Analysis of purified PS/A revealed a composition of 54% hexoses, 20% amino sugars, and 10% uronic acids (39). As specific sugars, galactose (22%), glucosamine (15%), and galactosamine (5%) were detected (39). Recently, the composition of PS/A fromS. epidermidis RP62A and M187 grown in a chemically defined medium was reevaluated. There was an almost identical reactivity of anti-PS/A and anti-PIA antisera with several well-characterizedS. epidermidis strains, including the PS/A-producingS. epidermidis M187 and the PS/A-negative transposon mutant M187-sn3, the PIA-producing S. epidermidis 1457, and the isogenic PIA-negative mutant 1457-M11, as well as the recombinantS. carnosus containing the cloned icaADBClocus (23). These data suggest that PS/A and PIA are structurally related or even identical. Those authors reported that PS/A is a polysaccharide of high molecular mass composed of β-1,6-linked glucosamine residues with a high degree of substitution with succinate and acetate and that its production is dependent on theicaADBC locus (23). Since detailed data on the structural analysis of PS/A produced by S. epidermidishave not yet been reported, it remains to be determined whether PS/A is identical to polysaccharide II of PIA or whether it represents an additional variant of PIA. The genes inactivated by the transposon insertion in mutant M187-sn3 have not yet been identified; however, they are different from icaADBC(23) (D. Mack and H. Rohde, unpublished results). Its phenotype is very similar to class I and II mutants; however, no altered colony morphology was observed, as is typical for mutant M12, indicating that its phenotype most probably results from a different insertional gene inactivation. It is relevant to note that a similar altered colony morphology was also observed with other independent wild-type strains in which the Tn917 insertion of mutant M12 was transferred by transduction (D. Mack and A. Sabottke, unpublished results).

Our results indicate that expression of icaADBC and PIA synthesis is tightly regulated in S. epidermidis. Cure of biomaterial-related S. epidermidis infections typically requires removal of the infected biomaterial and complete debridement of the infected tissue, since antibiotic therapy regularly fails when the foreign material remains in situ (1). It is believed that the resistance of an established biomaterial-related S. epidermidis infection to therapy is related to the biofilm mode of growth of the bacteria. Indeed, Rupp and collaborators recently demonstrated by using the isogenic icaA insertion mutant 1457-M10 that a functional icaADBC locus and the ability for PIA synthesis and biofilm formation are essential virulence factors of S. epidermidis in a subcutaneous mouse catheter infection model and a rat central venous catheter infection model (32, 33). Further characterization of the regulatory mechanisms governing the expression of PIA and biofilm formation on a molecular level is of major importance, because it is reasonable to speculate that interference with these regulatory mechanisms may lead to improved methods of prevention and therapy of biomaterial-relatedS. epidermidis infections.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Rainer Laufs for his continuous support. The kind gift of plasmids pCN27 and pTXicaADBC by Friedrich Götz, Molekulare Genetik, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Vibeke T. Rosdahl, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark, for providing phages and propagating strains. For bacterial strains and plasmids, we thank W. B. Grubb, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia; and J. A. Gutierrez, Department of Oral Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville. The photographic work of C. Schlüter is acknowledged.

This work was supported in part by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to D.M.

Notes

Editor: E. I. Tuomanen

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 10 January 2000.
    • Returned for modification 17 February 2000.
    • Accepted 10 March 2000.
  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Bisno A. L.,
    2. Waldvogel F. A.
    Infections associated with indwelling medical devices. 1994 American Society for Microbiology Washington, D.C.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Cheung A. L.,
    2. Eberhardt K. J.,
    3. Fischetti V. A.
    A method to isolate RNA from gram-positive bacteria and mycobacteria.Anal. Biochem.2221994511514
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Christensen G. D.,
    2. Simpson W. A.,
    3. Bisno A. L.,
    4. Beachey E. H.
    Adherence of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis to smooth surfaces.Infect. Immun.371982318326
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Christensen G. D.,
    2. Simpson W. A.,
    3. Younger J. J.,
    4. Baddour L. M.,
    5. Barrett F. F.,
    6. Melton D. M.,
    7. Beachey E. H.
    Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices.J. Clin. Microbiol.2219859961006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Fey P. D.,
    2. Ulphani J. S.,
    3. Götz F.,
    4. Heilmann C.,
    5. Mack D.,
    6. Rupp M. E.
    Characterization of the relationship between polysaccharide intercellular adhesin and hemagglutination in Staphylococcus epidermidis.J. Infect. Dis.179199915611564
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Gerke C.,
    2. Kraft A.,
    3. Süssmuth R.,
    4. Schweitzer O.,
    5. Götz F.
    Characterization of the N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase activity involved in the biosynthesis of the Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin.J. Biol. Chem.27319981858618593
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Gutierrez J. A.,
    2. Crowley P. J.,
    3. Brown D. P.,
    4. Hillman J. D.,
    5. Youngman P.,
    6. Bleiweis A. S.
    Insertional mutagenesis and recovery of interrupted genes of Streptococcus mutans by using transposon Tn917: preliminary characterization of mutants displaying acid sensitivity and nutritional requirements.J. Bacteriol.178199641664175
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Heilmann C.,
    2. Götz F.
    Further characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis transposon mutants deficient in primary attachment or intercellular adhesion.Zentbl. Bakteriol.28719986983
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    1. Heilmann C.,
    2. Hussain M.,
    3. Peters G.,
    4. Götz F.
    Evidence for autolysin-mediated primary attachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis to a polystyrene surface.Mol. Microbiol.24199710131024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Heilmann C.,
    2. Schweitzer O.,
    3. Gerke C.,
    4. Vanittanakom N.,
    5. Mack D.,
    6. Götz F.
    Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis.Mol. Microbiol.20199610831091
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Herrmann M.,
    2. Vaudaux P. E.,
    3. Pittet D.,
    4. Auckenthaler R.,
    5. Lew P. D.,
    6. Schumacher-Perdreau F.,
    7. Peters G.,
    8. Waldvogel F. A.
    Fibronectin, fibrinogen, and laminin act as mediators of adherence of clinical staphylococcal isolates to foreign material.J. Infect. Dis.1581988693701
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Hussain M.,
    2. Herrmann M.,
    3. von Eiff C.,
    4. Perdreau-Remington F.,
    5. Peters G.
    A 140-kilodalton extracellular protein is essential for the accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains on surfaces.Infect. Immun.651997519524
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hussain M.,
    2. Wilcox M. H.,
    3. White P. J.
    The slime of coagulase-negative staphylococci: biochemistry and relation to adherence.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.101993191207
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Hussain M.,
    2. Wilcox M. H.,
    3. White P. J.,
    4. Faulkner M. K.,
    5. Spencer R. C.
    Importance of medium and atmosphere type to both slime production and adherence by coagulase-negative staphylococci.J. Hosp. Infect.201992173184
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    1. Mack D.
    Molecular mechanisms of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation.J. Hosp. Infect.43 (Suppl.)1999S113S125
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    1. Mack D.,
    2. Bartscht K.,
    3. Dobinsky S.,
    4. Horstkotte M. A.,
    5. Kiel K.,
    6. Knobloch J. K. M.,
    7. Schäfer P.
    Staphylococcal factors involved in adhesion and biofilm formation on biomaterials Handbook for studying bacterial adhesion: principles, methods, and applications. An Y. H., Friedman R. J. 2000 307 330 Humana Press Totowa, N.J
  17. 17.↵
    1. Mack D.,
    2. Fischer W.,
    3. Krokotsch A.,
    4. Leopold K.,
    5. Hartmann R.,
    6. Egge H.,
    7. Laufs R.
    The intercellular adhesin involved in biofilm accumulation of Staphylococcus epidermidis is a linear beta-1,6-linked glucosaminoglycan: purification and structural analysis.J. Bacteriol.1781996175183
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Mack D.,
    2. Haeder M.,
    3. Siemssen N.,
    4. Laufs R.
    Association of biofilm production of coagulase-negative staphylococci with expression of a specific polysaccharide intercellular adhesin.J. Infect. Dis.1741996881884
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Mack D.,
    2. Nedelmann M.,
    3. Krokotsch A.,
    4. Schwarzkopf A.,
    5. Heesemann J.,
    6. Laufs R.
    Characterization of transposon mutants of biofilm-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis impaired in the accumulative phase of biofilm production: genetic identification of a hexosamine-containing polysaccharide intercellular adhesin.Infect. Immun.62199432443253
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Mack D.,
    2. Riedewald J.,
    3. Rohde H.,
    4. Magnus T.,
    5. Feucht H. H.,
    6. Elsner H. A.,
    7. Laufs R.,
    8. Rupp M. E.
    Essential functional role of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin of Staphylococcus epidermidis in hemagglutination.Infect. Immun.67199910041008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Mack D.,
    2. Siemssen N.,
    3. Laufs R.
    Parallel induction by glucose of adherence and a polysaccharide antigen specific for plastic-adherent Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for functional relation to intercellular adhesion.Infect. Immun.60199220482057
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Mack D.,
    2. Siemssen N.,
    3. Laufs R.
    Identification of a cell cluster associated antigen specific for plastic-adherent Staphylococcus epidermidis which is functional related to intercellular adhesion.Zentbl. Bakteriol. Suppl.261994411413
    OpenUrl
  23. 23.↵
    1. McKenney D.,
    2. Hübner J.,
    3. Muller E.,
    4. Wang Y.,
    5. Goldmann D. A.,
    6. Pier G. B.
    The ica locus of Staphylococcus epidermidis encodes production of the capsular polysaccharide/adhesin.Infect. Immun.66199847114720
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Muller E.,
    2. Hübner J.,
    3. Gutierrez N.,
    4. Takeda S.,
    5. Goldmann D. A.,
    6. Pier G. B.
    Isolation and characterization of transposon mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis deficient in capsular polysaccharide/adhesin and slime.Infect. Immun.611993551558
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    1. Nedelmann M.,
    2. Sabottke A.,
    3. Laufs R.,
    4. Mack D.
    Generalized transduction for genetic linkage analysis and transfer of transposon insertions in different Staphylococcus epidermidis strains.Zentbl. Bakteriol.28719988592
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.↵
    1. Nilsson M.,
    2. Frykberg L.,
    3. Flock J. I.,
    4. Pei L.,
    5. Lindberg M.,
    6. Guss B.
    A fibrinogen-binding protein of Staphylococcus epidermidis.Infect. Immun.66199826662673
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Pascual A.,
    2. Fleer A.,
    3. Westerdaal N. A.,
    4. Verhoef J.
    Modulation of adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to Teflon catheters in vitro.Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol.51986518522
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Pei L.,
    2. Palma M.,
    3. Nilsson M.,
    4. Guss B.,
    5. Flock J. I.
    Functional studies of a fibrinogen binding protein from Staphylococcus epidermidis.Infect. Immun.67199945254530
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Rupp M. E.,
    2. Archer G. L.
    Hemagglutination and adherence to plastic by Staphylococcus epidermidis.Infect. Immun.60199243224327
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Rupp M. E.,
    2. Archer G. L.
    Coagulase-negative staphylococci: pathogens associated with medical progress.Clin. Infect. Dis.191994231243
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    1. Rupp M. E.,
    2. Sloot N.,
    3. Meyer H. G.,
    4. Han J.,
    5. Gatermann S.
    Characterization of the hemagglutinin of Staphylococcus epidermidis.J. Infect. Dis.172199515091518
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Rupp M. E.,
    2. Ulphani J. S.,
    3. Fey P. D.,
    4. Bartscht K.,
    5. Mack D.
    Characterization of the importance of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin/hemagglutinin of Staphylococcus epidermidis in the pathogenesis of biomaterial-based infection in a mouse foreign body infection model.Infect. Immun.67199926272632
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    1. Rupp M. E.,
    2. Ulphani J. S.,
    3. Fey P. D.,
    4. Mack D.
    Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin/hemagglutinin in the pathogenesis of intravascular catheter-associated infection in a rat model.Infect. Immun.67199926562659
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  35. 35.↵
    1. Schumacher-Perdreau F.,
    2. Heilmann C.,
    3. Peters G.,
    4. Götz F.,
    5. Pulverer G.
    Comparative analysis of a biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis strain and its adhesion-positive, accumulation-negative mutant M7.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.11719947178
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.↵
    1. Schwarzkopf A.,
    2. Karch H.,
    3. Schmidt H.,
    4. Lenz W.,
    5. Heesemann J.
    Phenotypical and genotypical characterization of epidemic clumping factor-negative, oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.J. Clin. Microbiol.31199322812285
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Shaw J. H.,
    2. Clewell D. B.
    Complete nucleotide sequence of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B- resistance transposon Tn917 in Streptococcus faecalis.J. Bacteriol.1641985782796
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Thylefors J. D.,
    2. Harbarth S.,
    3. Pittet D.
    Increasing bacteremia due to coagulase-negative staphylococci: fiction or reality? Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 19 1998 581 589
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    1. Tojo M.,
    2. Yamashita N.,
    3. Goldmann D. A.,
    4. Pier G. B.
    Isolation and characterization of a capsular polysaccharide adhesin from Staphylococcus epidermidis.J. Infect. Dis.1571988713722 (Erratum, 158:268.)
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service: National nosocomial infectious surveillance (NNIS) report. Data summary from October 1986–April 1996, issued May 1996.Am. J. Infect. Control241996380388
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Service: National nosocomial infectious surveillance (NNIS) report. Data summary from October 1986–April 1997, issued May 1997.Am. J. Infect. Control241997477487
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    1. Udo E. E.,
    2. Grubb W. B.
    A new class of conjugative plasmid in Staphylococcus aureus.J. Med. Microbiol.311990207212
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    1. Udo E. E.,
    2. Grubb W. B.
    Conjugal transfer of plasmid pWBG637 from Staphylococcus aureus to Staphylococcus epidermidis and Streptococcus faecalis.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.601990183187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Veenstra G. J.,
    2. Cremers F. F.,
    3. van Dijk H.,
    4. Fleer A.
    Ultrastructural organization and regulation of a biomaterial adhesin of Staphylococcus epidermidis.J. Bacteriol.1781996537541
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Ziebuhr W.,
    2. Krimmer V.,
    3. Rachid S.,
    4. Lössner I.,
    5. Götz F.,
    6. Hacker J.
    A novel mechanism of phase variation of virulence in Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for control of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin synthesis by alternating insertion and excision of the insertion sequence element IS256.Mol. Microbiol.321999345356
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Identification of Three Essential Regulatory Gene Loci Governing Expression of Staphylococcus epidermidis Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin and Biofilm Formation
Dietrich Mack, Holger Rohde, Sabine Dobinsky, Joachim Riedewald, Max Nedelmann, Johannes K.-M. Knobloch, Holger-A. Elsner, Hubert H. Feucht
Infection and Immunity Jul 2000, 68 (7) 3799-3807; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.7.3799-3807.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of Three Essential Regulatory Gene Loci Governing Expression of Staphylococcus epidermidis Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin and Biofilm Formation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identification of Three Essential Regulatory Gene Loci Governing Expression of Staphylococcus epidermidis Polysaccharide Intercellular Adhesin and Biofilm Formation
Dietrich Mack, Holger Rohde, Sabine Dobinsky, Joachim Riedewald, Max Nedelmann, Johannes K.-M. Knobloch, Holger-A. Elsner, Hubert H. Feucht
Infection and Immunity Jul 2000, 68 (7) 3799-3807; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.7.3799-3807.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Adhesins, Bacterial
biofilms
Genes, Bacterial
Polysaccharides, Bacterial
Staphylococcus epidermidis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522