Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PATHOGENESIS

Vacuole Acidification Is Not Required for Survival ofSalmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium within Cultured Macrophages and Epithelial Cells

Olivia Steele-Mortimer, Maryse St-Louis, Martin Olivier, B. Brett Finlay
Olivia Steele-Mortimer
Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maryse St-Louis
Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Olivier
Infectious Diseases Unit, CHUL, Laval University, Quebec G1V 4G2, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
B. Brett Finlay
Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5401-5404.2000
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Phagosome acidification is an important component of the microbicidal response by infected eukaryotic cells. Thus, intracellular pathogens that reside within phagosomes must either block phagosome acidification or be able to survive at low pH. In this work, we studied the effect of phagosomal acidification on the survival of intracellular Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in different cell types. Bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of the vacuolar proton-ATPases, was used to block acidification of salmonella-containing vacuoles. We found that in several epithelial cell lines, treatment with bafilomycin A1 had no effect on intracellular survival or replication. Furthermore, although acidification was essential for Salmonella intracellular survival in J774 cultured macrophages, as reported previously (13), it is not essential in other macrophage cell lines. These data suggest that vacuolar acidification may play a role in intracellular survival of salmonellae only under certain conditions and in specific cell types.

Salmonella spp. are gram-negative facultative intracellular pathogens which infect a wide variety of animals, including humans (6). Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium is one of the leading causes of food poisoning in human beings and of particular concern given the recent emergence of a multidrug-resistant strain, DT104 (1). In salmonellae, two distinct virulence-associated type III secretion systems are located within Salmonella pathogenicity islands 1 and 2 (SPI1 and SPI2) (7, 14). The type III systems translocate distinct sets of proteins into the host cell (10). These effectors confer on serovar Typhimurium the ability to invade mammalian cells and, once inside, to survive and replicate. Intracellular salmonellae remain in the phagosome, or salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV), the biogenesis of which is regulated by the bacteria so that interactions with the endocytic pathway are limited and fusion with the terminal lysosome is blocked (8, 11, 15). Despite these restrictions on biogenesis, the SCV can become acidified, and it has been shown that acidification is necessary for the survival of salmonellae inside cultured macrophages (13). Based on this finding, it was postulated that acidification was essential for intracellular induction of specific survival genes in salmonellae. Alternatively, secretion rather than expression may be regulated. Indeed, it has recently been shown that the secretion of at least one type III effector is pH dependent (3). In this study, we compared the effect of blocking vacuolar acidification in different cell lines to further investigate the role of acidification in intracellular survival.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Intracellular survival of salmonellae in epithelial cells is acidification independent. Epithelial cells were incubated in the presence of salmonellae for 10 min and then further incubated in the presence of gentamicin as indicated. Intracellular survival is expressed relative to the number of CFU recovered from untreated infected cells at the earliest time point. Solid circles, untreated cells: open circles, BAF-treated cells. The standard deviations obtained from three independent experiments are indicated.

Vacuolar proton-ATPase activity plays no role in intracellular survival of salmonellae in epithelial cell lines.Previously it has been shown that vacuole acidification is required for survival of salmonellae in macrophages (13). However, invasion of epithelial cells also plays a vital role in salmonella pathogenesis, and we wanted to investigate whether there was a similar requirement for acidification in these cells. Invasion assays were carried out essentially as previously described (15). Briefly, the day before infection, cells were seeded in 24-well plates at 1 × 105 to 5 × 105 cells per well in Earle's minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. To block endosome acidification, cells were treated with 1 μM bafilomycin A1 (BAF) (Kamiya Biomedical Company, Seattle, Wash.) for 30 min prior to invasion. Virulent S. enterica serovar Typhimurium strain 14028s was grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth with shaking overnight at 37°C and then subcultured (1:33 dilution) for 2.5 h. Bacteria were then washed by centrifugation, resuspended in Earle's buffered salt solution, and added to cells at a multiplicity of infection of ∼10 for 10 min. Extracellular bacteria were then removed by washing three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Gentamicin (50 μg/ml) was added 20 min after invasion; when necessary, the concentration was decreased to 5 μg/ml at 2 h postinfection. At the indicated times, cells were washed twice with PBS and lysed in 1 ml of 1% Triton X-100–0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in PBS. The lysate was serially diluted in PBS and plated onto LB plates, and colonies were counted the next day. Invasion assay results are expressed relative to the number of CFU recovered at the earliest time point in untreated cells. Three epithelial cell lines, HeLa, MDCK, and Henle (Intestine-407), were used in these experiments. Bacterial survival was followed for 6 h in all experiments to allow bacterial replication, which typically occurred after an initial lag phase of approximately 4 h (Fig. 1). While BAF treatment appears to slightly increase the number of intracellular bacteria in MDCK and Henle cells at 6 h, the differences are not significant (Henle, t = 1.03, P = 0.36; MDCK, t = 1.84, P = 0.13). Thus, acidification apparently plays no role in either invasion or intracellular survival or replication in these cell lines.

Vacuolar proton-ATPase activity is not necessarily essential for intracellular survival of salmonellae in macrophage cell lines.The above results indicate that vacuole acidification does not play a role in survival of salmonellae in epithelial cells. In order to directly compare our results with those of Rathman et al. (13), we next carried out similar experiments in three different mouse macrophage cell lines, J774A.1, RAW264.7, and LM-1. LM-1 is a stable mouse macrophage cell line which has recently been described (G. Forget, K. A. Siminovitch, S. Brochu, S. Rivest, D. Radzioch, and M. Olivier, submitted for publication). All these cells were grown in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, and invasion was carried out as described above. In J774A.1, intracellular bacteria did not replicate over the time course of the experiment (up to 6 h); indeed, the CFU recovered decreased with time (Fig. 2A, inset). As expected, we found that inhibition of vacuolar acidification by BAF treatment significantly reduced the survival of intracellular bacteria (at 6 h, t = 5.68, P = 0.015) (Fig. 2A). To confirm that the BAF effect was due to reduced survival of intracellular bacteria rather than decreased uptake, we performed an experiment in which the cells were solubilized immediately after 10 min of invasion (Fig. 2B). BAF had no significant effect on invasion efficiency. This result was confirmed using a previously described immunofluorescent assay (15) which allows differentiation of intracellular and extracellular bacteria (not shown).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Intracellular survival of salmonellae in cultured macrophages. J774 cells (A and B), RAW cells (C), RAW cells treated with gamma interferon (IFN-γ) (D), or LM-1 cells (E) were incubated in the presence of salmonellae for 10 min and then further incubated without extracellular bacteria as indicated. Intracellular survival is expressed relative to the number of CFU recovered from untreated infected cells at the earliest time point. Solid circles, untreated cells; open circles, BAF-treated cells. The standard deviations obtained from three independent experiments are indicated.

Surprisingly, when similar experiments were carried out in RAW264.7 (Fig. 2C), no requirement for acidification could be detected (at 6 h, t = 0.14, P = 0.54). This is in direct contrast to the findings of Rathman et al. (13), and we considered that a possible reason for this was the state of activation of the cells. For this reason, we repeated the experiment using RAW cells which had been activated with 200 U of recombinant mouse gamma interferon (MG-FIN; Genzyme Diagnostics, Cambridge, Mass.) for 18 to 24 h prior to infection (Fig. 2D). However, we could still detect no significant difference in the intracellular survival of salmonellae (at 6 h, t = 1.07, P = 0.82). To further investigate the requirement for acidification in macrophages, we next repeated the experiments using LM-1 cells (Fig.2E). The results in these cells were very similar to those in the RAW cells, and there was no significant difference in intracellular survival in treated versus untreated cells (at 6 h, t = 0, P = 0.5).

BAF treatment abolishes vacuolar acidification in infected cells.To control for abolishment of vacuolar acidification under the conditions used in these experiments, we used acridine orange, a cell-permeating probe for acidified organelles (12, 13). For these experiments cells were grown on coverslips (12 mm), stained for 5 min with 5 μg (16.5 μM) of acridine orange hydrochloride (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) per ml, and visualized for fluorescence using a longpass fluorescein isothiocyanate filter (excitation, 450 to 490 nm; emission, ≥520 nm). The fluorescence emitted after excitation at 450 to 490 nm indicated the pH of the vacuoles. Figure3 illustrates results for J774A.1 (A and B), RAW264.7 (C and D), and Henle (E and F) cells. As expected, control cells emitted a red-orange fluorescence due to the naturally acidic nature of intracellular vacuoles, including endosomes and lysosomes. In BAF-treated cells, an intense green fluorescence was detected due to the lack of acidified intracellular organelles, confirming the effectiveness of vacuolar ATPase inhibition. Similar results were obtained for the other cell lines tested (data not shown).

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Effect of BAF on vacuolar acidification after staining with acridine orange. BAF-treated (B, D, and F) or control untreated cells (A, C, and E) were incubated for 5 min with acridine orange (5 μg/ml) in PBS and then visualized using a Zeiss Axiophot microscope with an ×65 oil immersion lens. (A and B) J774 cells. (C and D) RAW cells. (E and F) Henle cells. Bar, 20 μm.

Our results indicate that vacuole acidification is not essential for intracellular survival of salmonellae in all cell types. Certainly in epithelial cells we could detect no requirement for acidification, although in macrophage cells the results were more ambiguous. It is now clear that, as previously suggested (13), survival within host cells requires the induction of specific survival genes (2, 4, 9, 16). However, these genes may also be induced extracellularly under certain conditions, thus bypassing the need for intracellular induction. Slight differences in the growth and preparation of bacteria may account for the differences seen in our experiments. For example, it has been shown that the activity of both type III secretion systems of S. enterica is affected by pH (3, 5). Our results clearly show that vacuole acidification is not required per se for intracellular survival of salmonellae and illustrate the complexity of the interactions that occur between host cell and pathogen. Further studies, including comparison of bacterial genes induced by low pH or intracellularly, will be required to dissect the real role of acidification in intracellular survival of salmonellae.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada (grant MT10551). O.S.-M. was supported by an EMBO postdoctoral fellowship. B.B.F. is an MRC Scientist and a Howard Hughes International Research Scholar.

Notes

Editor: V. J. DiRita

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 25 February 2000.
    • Returned for modification 26 April 2000.
    • Accepted 8 June 2000.
  • Copyright © 2000 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Akkina J. E.,
    2. Hogue A. T.,
    3. Angulo F. J.,
    4. Johnson R.,
    5. Petersen K. E.,
    6. Saini P. K.,
    7. Fedorka-Cray P. J.,
    8. Schlosser W. D.
    Epidemiologic aspects, control, and importance of multiple-drug resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 in the United States.J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc.2141999790798
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Alpuche Aranda C. M.,
    2. Swanson J. A.,
    3. Loomis W. P.,
    4. Miller S. I.
    Salmonella typhimurium activates virulence gene transcription within acidified macrophage phagosomes.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA8919921007910083
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Beuzon C. R.,
    2. Banks G.,
    3. Deiwick J.,
    4. Hensel M.,
    5. Holden D. W.
    pH-dependent secretion of SseB, a product of the SPI-2 type III secretion system of Salmonella typhimurium.Mol. Microbiol.331999806816
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Cirillo D. M.,
    2. Valdivia R. H.,
    3. Monack D. M.,
    4. Falkow S.
    Macrophage-dependent induction of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 type III secretion system and its role in intracellular survival.Mol. Microbiol.301998175188
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Daefler S.
    Type III secretion by Salmonella typhimurium does not require contact with a eukaryotic host.Mol. Microbiol.3119994551
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Finlay B. B.,
    2. Falkow S.
    Common themes in microbial pathogenicity revisited.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.611997136169
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Galan J. E.,
    2. Curtiss R.
    Cloning and molecular characterization of genes whose products allow Salmonella typhimurium to penetrate tissue culture cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA86198963836387
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Garcia-del Portillo F.,
    2. Finlay B. B.
    Targeting of Salmonella typhimurium to vesicles containing lysosomal membrane glycoproteins bypasses compartments with mannose 6-phosphate receptors.J. Cell Biol.12919958197
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Janssen R.,
    2. Verjans G. M.,
    3. Kusters J. G.,
    4. Tommassen J.
    Induction of the phoE promoter upon invasion of Salmonella typhimurium into eukaryotic cells.Microb. Pathog.191995193201
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Lee V. T.,
    2. Schneewind O.
    Type III secretion machines and the pathogenesis of enteric infections caused by Yersinia and Salmonella spp.Immunol. Rev.1681999241255
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    1. Meresse S.,
    2. Steele-Mortimer O.,
    3. Finlay B. B.,
    4. Gorvel J. P.
    The rab7 GTPase controls the maturation of Salmonella typhimurium-containing vacuoles in HeLa cells.EMBO J.18199943944403
    OpenUrlAbstract
  12. 12.↵
    1. Palmgren M. G.
    Acridine orange as a probe for measuring pH gradients across membranes: mechanism and limitations.Anal. Biochem.1921991316321
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Rathman M.,
    2. Sjaastad M. D.,
    3. Falkow S.
    Acidification of phagosomes containing Salmonella typhimurium in murine macrophages.Infect. Immun.64199627652773
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Shea J. E.,
    2. Hensel M.,
    3. Gleeson C.,
    4. Holden D. W.
    Identification of a virulence locus encoding a second type III secretion system in Salmonella typhimurium.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93199625932597
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Steele-Mortimer O.,
    2. Meresse S.,
    3. Gorvel J. P.,
    4. Toh B. H.,
    5. Finlay B. B.
    Biogenesis of Salmonella typhimurium-containing vacuoles in epithelial cells involves interactions with the early endocytic pathway.Cell. Microbiol.119993349
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Valdivia R. H.,
    2. Falkow S.
    Bacterial genetics by flow cytometry: rapid isolation of Salmonella typhimurium acid-inducible promoters by differential fluorescence induction.Mol. Microbiol.221996367378
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Vacuole Acidification Is Not Required for Survival ofSalmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium within Cultured Macrophages and Epithelial Cells
Olivia Steele-Mortimer, Maryse St-Louis, Martin Olivier, B. Brett Finlay
Infection and Immunity Sep 2000, 68 (9) 5401-5404; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5401-5404.2000

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vacuole Acidification Is Not Required for Survival ofSalmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium within Cultured Macrophages and Epithelial Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Vacuole Acidification Is Not Required for Survival ofSalmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium within Cultured Macrophages and Epithelial Cells
Olivia Steele-Mortimer, Maryse St-Louis, Martin Olivier, B. Brett Finlay
Infection and Immunity Sep 2000, 68 (9) 5401-5404; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5401-5404.2000
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

macrolides
macrophages
Salmonella Typhimurium
Vacuoles

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522