Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Fungal and Parasitic Infections

B Cells and Antibodies Are Required for Resistance to the Parasitic Gastrointestinal Nematode Trichuris muris

Nathan M. Blackwell, Kathryn J. Else
Nathan M. Blackwell
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kathryn J. Else
School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.6.3860-3868.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Previous studies using cell transfers and antibody receptor knockout mice have shown that B cells and antibodies are not essential components of the expulsion mechanism in Trichuris murisinfections. Serum transfer experiments have given mixed results regarding the importance of antibodies in this infection model, and the role of B cells in initiating or maintaining T-cell responses has not been addressed. We used B-cell-deficient μMT mice to determine if B cells play a role in anti-T. muris immune responses. In contrast to wild-type C57BL/6 mice, μMT mice were susceptible to infection. Antigen-restimulated mesenteric lymph node cells from infected μMT mice produced only naive levels of Th2-associated cytokines but had increased levels of gamma interferon. However, these mice appeared capable of mounting a Th2-dependent mucosal mastocytosis, though this was significantly delayed compared to that seen in wild-type mice. Resistance to T. muris was restored following reconstitution with naive C57BL/6 splenic B cells, as was in vitro Th2 cytokine production in response to parasite antigen. Treatment of μMT mice with anti-interleukin-12 monoclonal antibody during the first 2 weeks of infection also restored immunity, suggesting that μMT mice can be manipulated to expel worms at the time of T-cell priming. Additionally, treatment of μMT mice with parasite-specific immunoglobulin G1 purified from the serum of resistant NIH mice prevented worm establishment, suggesting an important role for antibodies. Our results as a whole describe the first detailed report of a critical role for B cells in resistance to an intestinal nematode.

The role of T cells in mediating resistance and susceptibility to the parasitic gastrointestinal nematode Trichuris muris have been well characterized. This is largely because of the existence of strains of mice resistant and susceptible to the parasite and the early observation of polarized T helper responses in those strains (13). Resistant strains of mouse such as BALB/c, BALB/K, and NIH mount a typical Th2-type response, associated with the production of interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13 by parasite antigen-restimulated mesenteric lymph node cells (MLNC). These strains expel their worm burdens by day 18 postinfection (p.i.). Susceptible strains such as AKR mount a dominant Th1 response, associated with low levels of Th2 cytokines and the presence of high levels of gamma interferon (IFN-γ). Here, infections proceed to patency at around day 35 p.i. (9, 12, 15). Strains such as C57BL/6 and C57BL/10 mount a mixed Th1/Th2 response, but the majority of infected mice expel all or most of their worms between days 21 and 28 p.i., through a Th2-mediated response.

The contribution of T cells and the Th1/Th2-associated cytokines have been confirmed by cytokine manipulation studies. Resistant strains deficient in IL-4 or IL-13, or treated with anti-IL-4 receptor or recombinant IL-12, become susceptible, whereas susceptible strains deficient in IFN-γ, or treated with recombinant IL-4, become resistant (3, 4, 11). Furthermore, the importance of CD4+ T cells has been demonstrated by observations that athymic (nude) BALB/c mice (28) and mice depleted of CD4+ T cells by antibody treatment (32) are susceptible to infection with T. muris. Finally, transfer of purified immune CD4+ T cells from infected BALB/c mice to SCID mice (which lack T and B cells) confers resistance (14), indicating that B cells and antibodies are not an essential component of the expulsion mechanism in primary infections.

In contrast to T cells, very little is known of the role of B cells in immune responses to T. muris. Although the purified T-cell transfer experiments suggest a redundancy for B cells and antibodies in the expulsion mechanism, they do not discount the possibility of B cells playing a role in the priming of T cells and the maintenance the T-cell response. To determine whether B cells play any role in the immune responses of mice to T. muris, we infected B-cell-deficient μMT mice with T. muris. The data presented here show that B cells are required for resistance toT. muris and that this requirement is associated with the development of a Th2-type response. Furthermore, resistance can be restored by reconstitution with naive B cells or by treatment with anti-IL-12. Finally, prevention of worm establishment can be achieved in μMT mice by treatment with parasite-specific immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibodies purified from the sera of resistant NIH mice. Together, these findings suggest that B cells and antibodies do have important roles in the immune responses of mice to infection withT. muris.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals.Male μMT mice (31) were obtained from breeding pairs maintained at our animal unit (animals originally purchased from Bantin & Kingman, Hull, United Kingdom, and backcrossed six generations on the C57BL/6 background). Male C57BL/6 mice (Harlan-Olac Ltd., Bicestor, Oxon, United Kingdom) were used as wild-type controls. Male AKR and NIH mice were purchased from Harlan-Olac Ltd. All mice were infected at 6 weeks of age.

Parasite and antigens.The Edinburgh strain of T. muris was used throughout. Experimental infections were performed using oral gavage, with levels of infection determined at sacrificial time points by counting the number of worms present in the cecum and colon. Briefly, guts were frozen at −20°C for at least 24 h. Worm burden determinations were made by scraping the mucosa to remove early larval stages or by removal of individual worms using fine forceps (adult stages). T. muris excretory/secretory (E/S) antigen was prepared as previously described (1).

Preparation of MLNC for in vitro restimulations.Mesenteric lymph nodes were removed from naive and infected mice and dissociated in Hanks balanced salt solution (supplemented with 2% fetal calf serum, 100 U of penicillin/ml, 100 μg of streptomycin/ml; all purchased from Gibco). MLNC were washed three times and resuspended at 5 × 106 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM l-glutamine (Gibco), 100 U of penicillin/ml, 100 μg of streptomycin/ml, and 7.5 × 10−10 M monothioglycerol (Sigma-Aldrich). MLNC were stimulated in vitro with T. muris E/S (50 μg/ml) and cultured at 37°C in 5% CO2. Supernatants were collected after 48 h and stored at −80°C until analyzed.

Cytokine analysis.Sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were used to determine the concentrations of IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IFN-γ in the supernatants recovered from in vitro-cultured MLNC. Monoclonal antibodies BVD4-1D11 and 24G2.3 (IL-4), TRFK.5 and TRFK.4 (IL-5), and R46A2 and XMG1.2 (IFN-γ) were purchased from Pharmingen (San Diego, Calif.). The anti-IL-9 antibodies used were D9302C12 (Pharmingen) and 229.4 (kindly provided by J. Van Snick, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Brussels, Belgium). The cytokine contents of supernatants were compared to recombinant murine cytokine standards. The detection limit above background for each cytokine was calculated from the optical density values of 16 wells incubated with culture medium, with the cytokine concentration considered positive only if its value exceeded the average plus 3 standard deviations of the background level. Results are presented as means ± standard error (SE).

Serum parasite-specific antibody detection.Blood was collected from sacrificed animals by cardiac puncture and left at room temperature to clot. Serum was then collected from each sample, aliquoted, and stored at −80°C until analysis. Serum levels of parasite-specific IgG1 and IgG2a were determined by ELISA. Briefly, 96-well plates (Dynex, Billingshurst, West Sussex, United Kingdom) were coated overnight with T. muris E/S at 5 μg/ml in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6; 50 μl/well). After blocking with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 3% bovine serum albumin and 0.05% Tween 20 (Sigma), the plates were incubated with sera serially diluted in PBS-Tween 20 from 1:20 to 1:2,560. Antigen-specific antibodies were detected using biotinylated rat anti-IgG1 (LO-MG1-2; Serotec) or rat anti-IgG2a (R19-15; Pharmingen) antibodies (50 μl/well at predetermined concentrations) and streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (0.5 U/ml; 75 μl/well; Boehringer Mannheim). 2,2-Azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (Sigma) at 1 mg/ml in citrate buffer 0.003% H2O2 was used as the substrate, and the plates were read at 405 nm after 20 min with a Dynatech MR7000. Nonsaturating serum dilutions were compared for analysis.

Histology.At autopsy, cecal tips were removed and fixed in Carnoy's solution. Fixed tissues were embedded in wax, sectioned, and stained for mast cells with 0.5% toluidine blue (pH 0.3). Mast cell numbers were counted blindly from 20 randomly selected cecal crypt units.

Serum MMCP-1 detection.Serum levels of mouse mast cell protease 1 (MMCP-1) were determined using a commercially available ELISA kit from Moredun Scientific (Penicuik, Scotland) (27).

B-cell purification and adoptive transfer.B cells were obtained from naive C57BL/6 spleens by magnetic negative selection using anti-CD43-coated beads (MidiMACS; Miltenyi Biotec). CD43 is expressed on B-1 and plasma cells, granulocytes, macrophages, platelets, and NK and T cells but not on mature B-2 cells. μMT recipients were each given 2.5 × 107 B cells intravenously (93% B-cell purity, <2% CD4+ T-cell contamination, determined by flow cytometry), while control mice received Hanks medium. All mice were infected the following day, and worm burdens were determined on day 35 p.i.

Anti-IL-12 treatment.μMT and AKR mice were injected intraperitoneally with rat anti-mouse IL-12 antibody C17.8 (cell line kindly provided by G. Trinchieri, Schering-Plough, Dardilly, France) on days 0, 5, 9, and 14 p.i. (1 mg of antibody per injection). Control mice were injected with rat IgG (Sigma) at the same concentration and time points as those treated with C17.8. As C57BL/6 mice are naturally resistant to T. muris, to ensure that the C17.8 antibody stock was capable of converting an immunocompetent susceptible mouse to a resistant phenotype, male age-matched AKR mice were used. Worm burdens were assessed at days 11, 21, and 35 p.i.

Serum antibody purification and adoptive transfer.For antibody donors we chose the NIH mouse strain. This strain is very resistant to T. muris infection and produces high levels of serum parasite-specific IgG1 from 3 weeks p.i., with levels continuing to rise for many weeks after parasite expulsion (17). NIH mice were given large infections (approximately 250 infective T. muris eggs) and sacrificed on day 50 p.i. Serum was collected and passed over a 5-ml Hi-Trap protein G column (Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Bound antibody was eluted with 1.0 M glycine-HCl (pH 2.7) into 1.0 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.0) and dialyzed against PBS for 24 h. After dialysis, the concentration of antibody was determined by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm and adjusted to 5 mg/ml. Antibody solution was then sterile filtered through a 0.8/0.2-μm Acrodisc (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, Mich.) and stored at −80°C. ELISAs showed the presence in the antibody solution of parasite-specific IgG1 but no other isotypes (data not shown). The purified antibodies were transferred to recipient μMT mice by intraperitoneal injection, with 1 mg of antibody given on days 0, 1, and 3 p.i. Control mice received equivalent amounts of purified nonspecific IgG (purified from the serum of naive NIH mice as outlined above or purchased commercially from Sigma). AKR mice were treated similarly with either purified parasite-specific IgG1 or nonspecific IgG.

Statistical analysis.Significant differences (P < 0.05) between experimental groups were determined by the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

μMT mice are susceptible to infection with T. muris.Mouse strains are considered to be resistant toT. muris if they can expel all or most of the worms in an infection. Resistant strains typically expel worms between day 11 and 28 p.i., whereas susceptible strains are unable to expel their worms and infections proceed to patency at around day 35 p.i. Hence, worm burdens at day 35 p.i. are typically used to indicate whether a strain is resistant or susceptible. To determine if B cells play a role in the immune responses to T. muris, worm burdens recovered from infected μMT and C57BL/6 mice were analyzed postinfection (Fig. 1). μMT mice were completely susceptible to infection with T. muris, with significantly more worms than C57BL/6 mice at day 35 p.i. (P = 0.0193) . Worms recovered from μMT mice at day 35 p.i. were fully developed adults. In contrast, C57BL/6 mice expelled worms from day 21 p.i. and had completely expelled their worms by day 35 p.i.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

T. muris worm burdens (mean ± SE) during the course of infection in B-cell-deficient μMT mice and wild-type C57BL/6 mice. Mice were infected with approximately 100 infective embryonated T. muris eggs on day 0 ( n = 4 per group). ∗, significant difference in worm numbers between C57BL/6 and μMT mice (P = 0.0193) .

Serum from infected C57BL/6 mice contained both parasite-specific IgG1 and IgG2a, detectable above naive background levels from day 21 p.i. μMT serum contained no antibody (data not shown).

Parasite antigen-restimulated MLNC from infected μMT mice do not produce Th2-associated cytokines and produce low levels of IFN-γ.Resistance and susceptibility to T. muris have been convincingly demonstrated to be associated with the polarization of immune responses to Th2 and Th1, respectively (3, 4, 9, 11-13, 15). An indication of how a particular mouse has responded to infection can be seen by in vitro antigen-stimulated cytokine production from MLNC. The nature of the Th-type response mounted by infected μMT mice was determined by stimulating MLNC from these mice with parasite antigen in vitro. Supernatants recovered from these cultures were analyzed for the presence of Th1-(IFN-γ) and Th2-associated (IL-4, IL-5, and IL-9) cytokines.

Figure 2 shows parasite antigen-stimulated cytokine production from naive and infected μMT and C57BL/6 mice MLNC cultures. MLNC from infected animals were taken at day 21 p.i., which is the peak period of cytokine production in this infection model. MLNC from infected μMT mice did not produce levels of IL-4, IL-5, or IL-9 significantly above naive levels (Fig. 2A to C). Only IFN-γ was significantly elevated in these cultures (P = 0.0037) (Fig. 2D), indicating that infected μMT mice were mounting a polarized Th1 response in the absence of a Th2 response. In contrast, levels of all four cytokines were significantly above naive levels in the supernatants of infected C57BL/6 mice (P < 0.05) , as is typically observed for this mouse strain. Similar results were obtained from MLNC cultured in the presence of concanavalin A (data not shown).

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Cytokine analyses of MLNC supernatants from μMT mice and C57BL/6 mice. MLNC from naive mice and T. muris-infected mice (day 21 p.i. [d21p.i.]) were restimulated in vitro with parasite antigen (50 μg/ml). Supernatants were harvested after 48 h and analyzed by sandwich ELISA for the presence of IL-4 (A), IL-5 (B), IL-9 (C), and IFN-γ (D). Results are shown as means ± SE ( n = 4 per group). ∗, significant increase above naive levels (P < 0.05) .

Mucosal mastocytosis is equivalent in magnitude, but delayed in development, in the absence of B cells.As an indication of the presence of a Th2-type response being mounted by the host, mucosal mastocytosis in the cecum was examined. Figure3A shows that like wild-type mice, μMT mice are capable of mounting a mucosal mastocytosis in response to infection. In both μMT and C57BL/6 mice, this increase in mast cell numbers was seen from day 11 p.i.; however, peak mastocytosis occurred earlier in C57BL/6 mice (day 21 p.i.) than in μMT mice (day 28 p.i.), with a significant difference in mast cell numbers occurring at day 21 p.i. (P = 0.0209) . Mast cell numbers then decreased in both strains, despite the continuing presence of worms in the μMT mice.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Mucosal mast cell numbers (A) and serum MMCP-1 levels (B) in naive and T. muris-infected μMT and C57BL/6 mice. Naive levels are indicated at day 0. Mast cells were counted from 20 crypt units (c.u.) in toluidine blue-stained cecal sections, and results are presented as mean mast cell numbers per 20 crypt units ± SE. Serum MMCP-1 levels were determined by ELISA and presented as means ± SE. ∗, significant difference between C57BL/6 and μMT mice (P < 0.05) .

Figure 3B shows the changes in serum levels of MMCP-1 during the course of infection. Serum MMCP-1 levels reflected mucosal mastocytosis, indicating that the mast cells were functionally capable of degranulating in both strains. Serum MMCP-1 levels were significantly higher in the μMT mice at day 28 p.i. (P = 0.0339) , perhaps reflecting the delayed peak in mast cell numbers seen in the gut compared to wild-type mice and the continued presence of parasites.

Reconstitution with B cells restores resistance to T. muris in μMT mice.To establish if the loss of resistance of the μMT mice was due to the absence of B cells, μMT mice were reconstituted with 2.5 × 107 naive C57BL/6 splenic B cells before infection. Figure 4 shows that μMT mice reconstituted with B cells had restored immunity toT. muris, having worm burdens at day 35 p.i. similar to those in infected C57BL/6 mice at day 35 p.i. (P = 0.1732) . μMT mice treated with Hanks solution harbored worm burdens at day 35 p.i. equivalent to the infective dose ofT. muris eggs given on day 0 (infective dose indicated by C57BL/6 worm burdens at day 11 p.i.) and significantly different from C57BL/6 worm burdens at day 35 p.i. (P = 0.0088) . Although worm burdens were higher than those observed in Fig. 1, the importance is that μMT mice did not expel worms unless reconstituted with B cells. Both levels of worm burdens (Fig. 1 and 4) were well above threshold levels (approximately 40 worms) below which no expulsion occurs, even in resistant strains.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

T. muris worm burdens recovered from C57BL/6 (C57), μMT (muMT), and B-cell-reconstituted μMT (muMTB) mice at day 35 p.i. (d35). B-cell-reconstituted μMT mice received 2.5 × 107 naive splenic C57BL/6 B cells intravenously 1 day before infection. Mice were infected with approximately 175 infective embryonated T. muris eggs (C57 d11) ( n = 5 per group) at day 35 p.i. ∗, significant difference in worm numbers between C57BL/6 day 35 p.i. and B-cell-reconstituted μMT day 35 p.i. (P = 0.0088) .

Flow cytometric analyses of MLNC and spleen cells showed low but detectable percentages of B220+ cells in the B-cell-reconstituted μMT mice (2.95% of MLNC and 9.46% of spleen cells at day 22 p.i.). However, B-cell reconstitution was clearly sufficient for the successful priming of Th2 cells in vivo and restoration of Th2 cytokine production in vitro. Figure 5A to C shows that whereas antigen-restimulated MLNC from Hanks solution-treated μMT mice failed to produce levels of Th2 cytokines above naive levels (consistent with earlier observations), MLNC from μMT mice reconstituted with B cells produced elevated levels of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-9 and had lower levels of IFN-γ than Hanks solution-treated μMT mice (Fig. 5). Overall levels of cytokines from T. muris-infected C57BL/6 and μMT antigen-restimulated MLNC are lower than in Fig. 2 but qualitatively remain the same.

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Cytokine analyses of B-cell-reconstituted μMT mice. MLNC from naive and T. muris-infected C57BL/6 (C57), μMT (muMT), and B cell-reconstituted μMT (muMTB) mice at day 22 p.i. (d22) were cultured as described for Fig. 2. Supernatants were tested for the presence of IL-4 (A), IL-5 (B), IL-9 (C), and IFN-γ (D) by sandwich ELISA. Results are shown as means ± SE. Naive groups are represented by pooled cells from infected groups ( n = 2 except muMT d22 [n = 1] ).

The restoration of a Th2 response in MLNC also resulted in the restoration of parasite-specific IgG1 response in the serum (Fig.6A); however, no parasite-specific IgG2a was detected in the sera of these mice, perhaps reflecting the low IFN-γ levels detected in vitro compared to that of the infected C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 5D). No antibody was detected in the serum of Hanks solution-treated μMT mice, while both parasite-specific IgG1 and IgG2a were detected in the sera of infected C57BL/6 mice after day 22 p.i. (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Serum was collected from naive and T. muris-infected C57BL/6 (C57), μMT (muMT), and B cell-reconstituted μMT (muMTB) mice and tested for the presence of parasite-specific IgG1 (A) and IgG2a (B) by ELISA. Data shown compare mean optical densities (od) ± SE obtained from serum at a nonsaturating dilution of 1:160 ( n = 4 for naive and day 35 p.i. [d35] groups). ∗, significant increase above naive levels (P < 0.05) .

Treatment with anti-IL-12 antibody restores resistance to T. muris in μMT mice.IL-12 has been identified as a key cytokine involved in the polarization of Th1 cells during T-cell priming (24, 26, 38). B cells have been shown to downregulate production of IL-12 by dendritic cells in vitro by producing IL-10, thus allowing Th2-priming conditions to develop (50). With the initial observation that infected μMT mice mount a Th1 response (indicated by production of IFN-γ and no Th2 cytokines from MLNC stimulated with parasite antigen in vitro), we treated μMT mice with anti-IL-12 monoclonal antibody to see if it could alter the polarization of the immune response from Th1 to Th2 and hence restore resistance. As C57BL/6 mice are normally resistant toT. muris, we included AKR mice (which are naturally susceptible) as a positive control. Anti-IL-12 treatment has been shown to make AKR mice resistant to T. muris (A. J. Bancroft, unpublished observations). Figure 7 shows that treatment with anti-IL-12 restores immunity to T. murisin μMT mice, resulting in a significant worm expulsion (P = 0.0088) by day 21 p.i., following kinetics similar to those for C57BL/6 mice and anti-IL-12-treated AKR mice. The majority of worms recovered from C57BL/6 and anti-IL-12-treated mice at day 35 p.i. were stunted in development. μMT and AKR mice treated with rat IgG maintained their worm burdens throughout the experiment, and worms recovered from these mice were fully developed at day 35 p.i.

Fig. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

T. muris worm burdens (mean ± SE) for μMT and AKR mice treated with either anti-IL-12 monoclonal antibody C17.8 or rat IgG (rIg) on days 0, 5, 9, and 14 p.i. (1 mg of antibody per intraperitoneal injection). Infected C57BL/6 mice were included as controls. Mice were infected with approximately 150 infective embryonated T. muris eggs on day 0, and worm burdens were counted in groups of four mice per strain at the time points shown. ∗, significant difference in worm burdens between rat IgG- and C17.8-treated groups of the same mouse strain (P < 0.05) .

Antigen-restimulated MLNC from rat IgG- and anti-IL-12-treated μMT failed to produce elevated levels of Th2 cytokines in vitro, but IFN-γ was lower (though not significantly) in the supernatants harvested from anti-IL-12-treated μMT MLNC compared to rat IgG-treated μMT MLNC. Levels of Th2-associated cytokines were higher in the supernatants of MLNC from anti-IL-12-treated AKR mice compared to the rat IgG-treated group, while IFN-γ was decreased (data not shown).

Passive transfer of parasite-specific IgG1 can prevent worm establishment in μMT mice.Immunocompetent mice that successfully expel T. muris maintain high levels of serum parasite-specific antibody for months (N. M. Blackwell and K. J. Else, unpublished observations). Although expulsion of primary infections can occur in the absence of antibody (14), the high levels of specific antibody present following expulsion in immunocompetent mice may play a role in preventing the establishment of challenge infections. Our results show that parasite-specific IgG1 purified from the serum of resistant mice can prevent establishment of worm burdens if transferred to naive susceptible mice at the time of infection (Fig. 8). Whereas AKR and μMT mice treated with nonspecific IgG had worm burdens at days 11 and 35 p.i. comparable to the infective dose of T. muriseggs given on day 0, parasite-specific IgG1-treated μMT mice at day 11 p.i. (P = 0.0209) and parasite-specific IgG1-treated AKR mice at days 11 and 35 p.i. had significant reductions in worm burdens ( P = 0.0209 and 0.0202, respectively). Three of four parasite-specific IgG1-treated μMT mice at day 35 p.i. also had large reductions in worm burdens (9, 48, and 59 worms) compared to the nonspecific IgG-treated group (118, 152, 175, and 279 worms); however, the remaining mouse harbored 174 worms, and hence there was no significant difference between the two μMT groups (P = 0.833) . Percentage reductions in worm burdens seen in parasite-specific IgG1-treated mice compared to nonspecific IgG-treated control groups varied: 49.3 and 59.9% reduction for μMT mice at days 11 and 35 p.i., respectively, and 48.9 and 77.9% reduction for AKR mice at days 11 and 35 p.i., respectively. Regardless of these differences, seven out of eight mice receiving parasite-specific IgG1 had large reductions in worm burdens compared to nonspecific IgG-treated mice.

Fig. 8.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 8.

T. muris worm burdens (mean ± SE) for μMT and AKR mice treated with either parasite-specific IgG1 (pIgG1) or nonspecific IgG (nIgG) on days 0, 1, and 3 p.i. (1 mg of antibody per intraperitoneal injection). Mice were infected with approximately 175 infective embryonated T. muris eggs on day 0 ( n = 4 per group). ∗, significant difference between parasite-specific and nonspecific IgG-treated groups of the same mouse strain (P < 0.05) . d11, day 11 p.i. group; d35, day 35 p.i. group.

ELISA showed the presence of parasite-specific IgG1 in the sera of recipient μMT mice and of parasite-specific IgG1 and IgG2a in the sera of both parasite-specific IgG1- and nonspecific IgG-treated AKR mice. No parasite-specific antibody was detected in the serum of nonspecific IgG-treated μMT mice (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

Previous studies analyzing the role of B cells in T. muris infection have suggested that they are not involved (or are not essential) in protective immunity. Lee et al. (36) showed that transfer of immune B cells to CBA/Ca mice (a resistant strain) failed to accelerate expulsion from days 20 to 16 p.i., whereas transfer of immune T cells did. In addition, transfer of immune CD4+ cells from BALB/c mice to SCID mice confers resistance to recipients in the absence of B cells and antibody (14). Although these studies demonstrated that B cells are not essential for expulsion, the results presented here show for the first time that B cells are required for resistance to T. muris, and they suggest that the requirement is involved in the successful priming of a rapid Th2-type response. The B-cell involvement in protective immunity could be through the role as accessory antigen-presenting cell or via antibody production. However, there has been little evidence reported in the literature to support the idea that antibody plays an important role in resistance to a primary intestinal helminth infection (reviewed in reference 10).

In the context of T. muris infections, μMT mice were incapable of expelling worms, and in vitro cytokine analyses showed that they mounted a Th1 response in the absence of a Th2 response. Despite the lack of Th2 cytokine production in the MLNC of infected μMT mice, these mice mounted a cecal mastocytosis, albeit delayed, which is dependent on the Th2 cytokines IL-4, IL-9, and IL-10. Thus, the local cytokine environment in μMT mice must be conducive to the development of a mast cell response. Mucosal mastocytoses feature in the immune responses of both resistant and susceptible animals (16, 35) and can be depleted from C57BL/6 mice with anti-c-Kit monoclonal antibody treatment without altering the resistance phenotype (5). Additionally, the observation that serum MMCP-1 levels (an indication of mucosal mast cell degranulation) were elevated in infected μMT mice suggests that antibodies are not required for mucosal mast cell degranulation. This is also in agreement with the observation that serum MMCP-1 levels increase in FcγR−/− mice infected with T. muris (5). Antibody-independent degranulation has also been demonstrated in vitro, using bone marrow-derived mast cells stimulated with transforming growth factor β (41). Hence cytokine action or possibly parasite antigen may induce mast cell degranulation in T. muris-infected mice.

A role for B cells in the priming of naive T cells has been both supported (7, 8, 29) and discounted (18, 19, 22, 34) in the literature. More recent studies have suggested that dendritic cells are the main cell type responsible for presenting antigens to naive T cells, while the presence of B cells is required for successful proliferation of primed T cells (23, 37, 45, 46) or in restimulating antigen-experienced T cells (21, 47). Our results suggest that naive T cells can be primed for Th1 responses in the absence of B cells, as evident from the IFN-γ produced from infected μMT MLNC in response to parasite antigen. In μMT mice, strong Th1 responses in the absence of Th2 responses have also been observed in Plasmodium chabaudi chabaudiinfections (33), while production of Th2 cytokines is significantly reduced in μMT mice compared to wild-type mice during the anti-egg response in Schistosoma mansoni infections (20, 30). Reconstitution of μMT mice with B cells restored the Th2 response to P. chaubaudi chabaudi infection (33), as was observed in this study, suggesting that B cells are required for the successful development of a Th2 response inT. muris-infected mice. However, studies by Brown and Reiner (6) have highlighted the importance of genetic background in studies of immune responses to infection in μMT mice. C57BL/6 μMT mice are resistant to Leishmania major infection and mount a Th1-type response, while BALB/c μMT mice are susceptible and mount a Th2-type response, as indicated by in vitro cytokine production and ex vivo reverse transcription-PCR analysis of local lymph nodes. Thus, the ability of B cells to influence Th1 and Th2 development in infection models may be dependent on genetic background. As BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice differ in the ability to mount Th2 responses to T. muris infection (2), we are currently investigating if the importance of the B cell varies according to genetic background.

Recent papers have identified mechanisms whereby B cells preferentially induce Th2 differentiation at the time of T-cell priming. B cells can downregulate IL-12 production by dendritic cells during T-cell priming by producing IL-10, thus allowing T-cell-derived IL-4 to have an autocrine effect on Th2 development (50). Anti-IL-12 antibodies can convert Th1-inducing conditions to Th2-inducing conditions during in vitro CD4+ T-cell priming by dendritic cells (24). We have shown that treatment of μMT mice with anti-IL-12 antibody confers resistance to T. muris. We hypothesize that this treatment mimics the action of B-cell-derived IL-10 during T-cell priming, by reducing in vivo levels of IL-12 and allowing a dominant type 2 response to develop, as was observed in anti-IL-12-treated AKR mice. The lack of in vitro Th2 cytokine production from anti-IL-12-treated μMT mice may have been due to less efficient in vitro antigen presentation in the absence of the B cell, as has been previously suggested (6). The use of anti-IL-12 antibody to alter mouse strain resistance to parasitic infection has been shown in L. major infection (25), where treatment of C3H mice with anti-IL-12 during the first 3 weeks of infection resulted in a switch from a normal resistant Th1 response to a susceptible Th2 response. However, a reversion to a Th1 response occurred when treatment stopped at 3 weeks p.i. In our study, treatment only lasted for the first 2 weeks of infection. Had treatment lasted longer, more complete worm expulsion may have occurred in both μMT and AKR strains. Th2 cytokine production might also have been observed in the in vitro-cultured μMT MLNC.

Finally, we have identified a possible role for antibodies in anti-T. muris immune responses. It has been difficult to assign any role or importance to antibodies in resistance to T. muris, as despite being part of a Th2 response, expulsion ofT. muris can occur in the absence of a detectable IgG1 and IgE response. Experiments involving serum transfers from resistant to susceptible animals have given mixed results, ranging from protection or enhanced expulsion to an absence of any effect (17, 49, 51). Serum would, however, also contain cytokines, chemokines, and possibly parasite antigens, making it difficult to attribute any effects seen to antibodies. Passive transfer of monoclonal T. muris-specific IgA can give 30 to 50% protection to CBA mice, however (44). Here we have shown that parasite-specific IgG1 purified from the serum of resistant NIH mice reduced worm burdens in recipient μMT and AKR mice. Previously, the only convincing demonstration of an association between the passive transfer of a particular antibody isotype and resistance to a gastrointestinal nematode has been with Heligmosomoides polygyrus infections (43), where parasite-specific IgG1 limits worm establishment in recipient mice and causes developmental stunting of any worms that do infect the host.

From our study, we hypothesize that the parasite-specific antibody prevents initial worm establishment, possibly by blocking enzymes or other antigens important to the parasite in successfully penetrating the hosts' mucosal epithelial cells. Prevention of cell invasion by antigen-specific antibody has been demonstrated in vitro with other intracellular parasites, such as Toxoplasma gondii(48), Neospora caninum (42), and a nematode closely related to T. muris, Trichinella spiralis(39, 40). The development of similar assays for T. muris larvae would allow the effects of anti-T. murisantibody responses to be assessed directly in vitro. As high levels of parasite-specific antibodies are not usually generated early after infection, it is doubtful that antibody has a role in the expulsion of primary infections. However, it is possible that antibody plays an important role in the prevention of establishment of challenge infections. We are currently investigating whether parasite-specific IgG2a is protective.

In summary, our results have identified a clear role for the B cell in protective immunity to a gastrointestinal nematode. During a primaryT. muris infection, the B cell appears to be important for the development of a type 2 response (by cytokine action or costimulation). Parasite-specific antibodies associated with type 2 responses appear to be capable of limiting worm establishment and thus may play roles in limiting challenge infections. Future studies will address the mechanisms by which the B cell provides conditions conducive for the generation and maintenance of Th2 cells and the mechanisms by which parasite-specific antibodies prevent worm establishment.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Wellcome Trust grant 044494/Z/95/Z to K. J. Else and additional funding by the MRC to N. M. Blackwell.

We thank Richard Grencis, Rachel Lawrence, and Lisa Ganley-Leal for helpful comments on the manuscript. We also thank Richard Grencis for help with the intravenous injections.

Notes

Editor: W. A. Petri

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 7 December 2000.
    • Returned for modification 9 February 2001.
    • Accepted 5 March 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Artis D.,
    2. Potten C.,
    3. Else K. J.,
    4. Finkelman F. D.,
    5. Grencis R. K.
    Trichuris muris: host intestinal epithelial cell hyperproliferation during chronic infection is regulated by interferon-γ.Exp. Parasitol.921999144153
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Bancroft A. J.,
    2. Artis D.,
    3. Donaldson D. D.,
    4. Sypek J. P.,
    5. Grencis R. K.
    Gastrointestinal nematode expulsion in IL-4 knockout mice is IL-13 dependent.Eur. J. Immunol.30200020832091
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    1. Bancroft A. J.,
    2. Else K. J.,
    3. Sypek J. P.,
    4. Grencis R. K.
    Interleukin-12 promotes a chronic intestinal nematode infection.Eur. J. Immunol.271997866870
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    1. Bancroft A. J.,
    2. McKenzie A. N. J.,
    3. Grencis R. K.
    A critical role for IL-13 in resistance to intestinal nematode infection.J. Immunol.160199834533461
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Betts C. J.,
    2. Else K. J.
    Mast cells, eosinophils and antibody-mediated cellular cytotoxicity are not critical in resistance to Trichuris muris.Parasite Immunol.2119994552
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    1. Brown D. R.,
    2. Reiner S. L.
    Polarized helper-T-cell responses against Leishmania major in the absence of B cells.Infect. Immun.671999266270
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    1. Constant S. L.
    B lymphocytes as antigen-presenting cells for CD4+ T cell priming in vivo.J. Immunol.162199956955703
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Constant S. L.,
    2. Schweitzer N.,
    3. West J.,
    4. Ranney P.,
    5. Bottomly K.
    B lymphocytes can be competent antigen-presenting cells for priming CD4+ T cells to protein antigens in vivo.J. Immunol.155199537343741
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. 9.↵
    1. Else K. J.,
    2. Entwistle G. M.,
    3. Grencis R. K.
    Correlations between worm burden and markers of Th1 and Th2 cell subset induction in an inbred strain of mouse infected with Trichuris muris.Parasite Immunol.151993595600
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Else K. J.,
    2. Finkelman F. D.
    Intestinal nematode parasites, cytokines and effector mechanisms.Int. J. Parasitol.28199911451158
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    1. Else K. J.,
    2. Finkelman F. D.,
    3. Maliszewski C. R.,
    4. Grencis R. K.
    Cytokine-mediated regulation of chronic intestinal helminth infection.J. Exp. Med.1791994347351
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Else K. J.,
    2. Grencis R. K.
    Cellular immune responses to the murine nematode parasite Trichuris muris. I. Differential cytokine production during acute and chronic infection.Immunology721991508513
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    1. Else K. J.,
    2. Grencis R. K.
    Helper T-cell subsets in mouse trichuriasis.Parasitol. Today71991313316
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Else K. J.,
    2. Grencis R. K.
    Antibody-independent effector mechanisms in resistance to the intestinal nematode parasite Trichuris muris.Infect. Immun.64199629502954
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Else K. J.,
    2. Hultner L.,
    3. Grencis R. K.
    Cellular immune responses to the murine nematode parasite Trichuris muris. II. Differential induction of Th-cell subsets in resistant versus susceptible mice.Immunology751992232237
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Else K. J.,
    2. Wakelin D.
    Genetically-determined influences on the ability of poor responder mice to immunization against Trichuris muris.Parasitology1001990479489
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Else K. J.,
    2. Wakelin D.,
    3. Wassom D. L.,
    4. Hauda K. M.
    MHC-restricted antibody responses to Trichuris muris excretory/secretory (E/S) antigen.Parasite Immunol.121990509527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Epstein M. M.,
    2. Di Rosa F.,
    3. Jankovic D.,
    4. Sher A.,
    5. Matzinger P.
    Successful T cell priming in B cell-deficient mice.J. Exp. Med.1821995915922
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Eynon E. E.,
    2. Parker D. C.
    Small B cells as antigen-presenting cells in the induction of tolerance to soluble protein antigens.J. Exp. Med.1751992131138
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Ferru I.,
    2. Roye O.,
    3. Delacre M.,
    4. Auriault C.,
    5. Wolowczuk I.
    Infection of B-cell deficient mice by the parasite Schistosoma mansoni: demonstration of the participation of B cells in granuloma modulation.Scand. J. Immunol.481998233240
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    1. Fuchs E. J.,
    2. Matzinger P.
    B cells turn off virgin but not memory T cells.Science258199211561159
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Guery J.-C.,
    2. Ria F.,
    3. Adorini L.
    Dendritic cells but not B cells present antigenic complexes to class-II-restricted T cells after administration of protein in adjuvant.J. Exp. Med.1831996751757
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Hay-Glass K. T.,
    2. Naides S. J.,
    3. Scott C. F.,
    4. Benacerraf B.,
    5. Sy M.-S.
    T cell development in B cell-deficient mice. IV. The role of B cells as antigen-presenting cells in vivo.J. Immunol.1361986823829
    OpenUrlAbstract
  24. 24.↵
    1. Heufler C.,
    2. Koch F.,
    3. Stanzl U.,
    4. Topar G.,
    5. Wysocka M.,
    6. Trinchieri G.,
    7. Enk A.,
    8. Steinman R. M.,
    9. Romani N.,
    10. Schuler G.
    Interleukin-12 is produced by dendritic cells and mediates T helper 1 development as well as interferon-γ production by T helper 1 cells.Eur. J. Immunol.261996659668
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Hondowicz B. D.,
    2. Scharton-Kersten T. M.,
    3. Jones D. E.,
    4. Scott P.
    Leishmania major-infected C3H mice treated with anti-IL-12 mAb develop but do not maintain a Th2 response.J. Immunol.159199750245031
    OpenUrlAbstract
  26. 26.↵
    1. Hsieh C.-S.,
    2. Macatonia S. E.,
    3. Tripp C. S.,
    4. Wolf S. F.,
    5. O'Garra A.,
    6. Murphy K. M.
    Development of TH1 CD4+ T cells through IL-12 produced by Listeria-induced macrophages.Science2601993547549
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Huntley J. F.,
    2. Gooden C.,
    3. Newlands G. F. J.,
    4. MacKellar A.,
    5. Lammas D. A.,
    6. Wakelin D.,
    7. Tuohy M.,
    8. Woodbury R. G.,
    9. Miller H. R. P.
    Distribution of intestinal mast cell proteinase in blood and tissues of normal and Trichinella-infected mice.Parasite Immunol.1219908595
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ito Y.
    The absence of resistance in congenitally athymic nude mice toward infection with the intestinal nematode Trichuris muris: resistance restored by lymphoid cell transfer.Int. J. Parasitol.2119916569
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Janeway C. A.,
    2. Ron Y.,
    3. Katz M. E.
    The B cell is the initiating antigen-presenting cell in peripheral lymph nodes.J. Immunol.138198710511055
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Jankovic D.,
    2. Cheever A. W.,
    3. Kullberg M. C.,
    4. Wynn T. A.,
    5. Yap G.,
    6. Caspar P.,
    7. Lewis F. A.,
    8. Clynes R.,
    9. Ravetch J. V.,
    10. Sher A.
    CD4+ T cell-mediated granulomatous pathology in schistosomiasis is downregulated by a B cell-dependent mechanism requiring Fc receptor signaling.J. Exp. Med.1871998619629
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Kitamura D.,
    2. Roes J.,
    3. Kuhn R.,
    4. Rajewsky K.
    A B cell-deficient mouse by targeted disruption of the membrane exon of the immunoglobulin μ chain gene.Nature3501991423426
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Koyama K.,
    2. Tamauchi H.,
    3. Ito Y.
    The role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in protective immunity to the murine nematode parasite Trichuris muris.Parasite Immunol.171995161165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Langhorne J.,
    2. Cross C.,
    3. Seixas E.,
    4. Li C.,
    5. von der Weid T.
    A role for B cells in the development of T cell helper function in a malaria infection in mice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95199817301734
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Lassila O.,
    2. Vainio O.,
    3. Matzinger P.
    Can B cells turn on virgin T cells? Nature 334 1988 253 255
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    1. Lee T. D. G.,
    2. Wakelin D.
    The use of host strain variation to assess the significance of mucosal mast cells in the spontaneous cure response of mice to the nematode Trichuris muris.Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.671982302305
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. 36.↵
    1. Lee T. D. G.,
    2. Wakelin D.,
    3. Grencis R. K.
    Cellular mechanisms of immunity to the nematode Trichuris muris.Int. J. Parasitol.131983349353
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    1. Liu Y.,
    2. Wu Y.,
    3. Ramarathinam L.,
    4. Guo Y.,
    5. Huszar D.,
    6. Trounstine M.,
    7. Zhao M.
    Gene-targeted B-deficient mice reveal a critical role for B cells in the CD4 T cell response.Int. Immunol.7199513531362
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    1. Macatonia S. E.,
    2. Hosken N. A.,
    3. Litton M.,
    4. Vieira P.,
    5. Hsieh C.-S.,
    6. Culpepper J. A.,
    7. Wysocka M.,
    8. Trinchieri G.,
    9. Murphy K. M.,
    10. O'Garra A.
    Dendritic cells produce IL-12 and direct the development of Th1 cells from naive CD4+ T cells.J. Immunol.154199550715079
    OpenUrlAbstract
  39. 39.↵
    1. McVay C. S.,
    2. Bracken P.,
    3. Gagliardo L. F.,
    4. Appleton J. A.
    Antibodies to tyvelose exhibit multiple modes of interference with the epithelial niche of Trichinella spiralis.Infect. Immun.68200019121918
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    1. McVay C. S.,
    2. Tsung A.,
    3. Appleton J. A.
    Participation of parasite surface glycoproteins in antibody-mediated protection of epithelial cells against Trichinella spiralis.Infect. Immun.66199819411945
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Miller H. R. P.,
    2. Wright S. H.,
    3. Knight P. A.,
    4. Thornton E. M.
    A novel function for transforming growth factor-β1: upregulation of the expression and the IgE-independent extracellular release of a mucosal mast cell granule-specific β-chymase, mouse mast cell protease-1.Blood93199934733486
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Nishikawa Y.,
    2. Xuan X.,
    3. Nagasawa H.,
    4. Igarashi I.,
    5. Fujisaka K.,
    6. Otsuka H.,
    7. Mikami T.
    Monoclonal antibody inhibition of Neospora caninum tachyzoite invasion into host cells.Int. J. Parasitol.3020005158
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Pritchard D. I.,
    2. Williams D. J. L.,
    3. Behnke J. M.,
    4. Lee T. D. G.
    The role of IgG1 hypergammaglobulinaemia in immunity to the gastrointestinal nematode Nematospiroides dubius. The immunochemical purification, antigen-specificity and in vivo anti-parasite effect of IgG1 from immune serum.Immunology491983353365
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. 44.↵
    1. Roach T. I. A.,
    2. Else K. J.,
    3. Wakelin D.,
    4. McLaren D. J.,
    5. Grencis R. K.
    Trichuris muris: antigen recognition and transfer of immunity in mice by IgA monoclonal antibodies.Parasite Immunol.131991112
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    1. Ron Y.,
    2. De Baetselier P.,
    3. Gordon J.,
    4. Feldman M.,
    5. Segal S.
    Defective induction of antigen-reactive proliferating T cells in B cell-deprived mice.Eur. J. Immunol.111981964968
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    1. Ron Y.,
    2. Sprent J.
    T cell priming in vivo: a major role for B cells in presenting antigen to T cells in lymph nodes.J. Immunol.138198728482856
    OpenUrlAbstract
  47. 47.↵
    1. Ronchese F.,
    2. Hausmann B.
    B lymphocytes in vivo fail to prime naive T cells but can stimulate antigen-experienced T lymphocytes.J. Exp. Med.1771993679690
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    1. Sayles P. C.,
    2. Gibson G. W.,
    3. Johnson L. L.
    B cells are essential for vaccination-induced resistance to virulent Toxoplasma gondii.Infect. Immun.68200010261033
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    1. Selby G. R.,
    2. Wakelin D.
    Transfer of immunity against Trichuris muris in the mouse by serum and cells.Int. J. Parasitol.31973717722
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 50.↵
    1. Skok J.,
    2. Poudrier J.,
    3. Gray D.
    Dendritic cell-derived IL-12 promotes B cell induction of Th2 development: a feedback regulation of Th1 development.J. Immunol.163199942844291
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    1. Wakelin D.
    Immune expulsion of Trichuris muris from mice during a primary infection: analysis of the components involved.Parasitology701975397405
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
B Cells and Antibodies Are Required for Resistance to the Parasitic Gastrointestinal Nematode Trichuris muris
Nathan M. Blackwell, Kathryn J. Else
Infection and Immunity Jun 2001, 69 (6) 3860-3868; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.6.3860-3868.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
B Cells and Antibodies Are Required for Resistance to the Parasitic Gastrointestinal Nematode Trichuris muris
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
B Cells and Antibodies Are Required for Resistance to the Parasitic Gastrointestinal Nematode Trichuris muris
Nathan M. Blackwell, Kathryn J. Else
Infection and Immunity Jun 2001, 69 (6) 3860-3868; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.6.3860-3868.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antibodies, Helminth
B-Lymphocytes
Trichuriasis
Trichuris

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522