Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Immunity and Vaccines

Meningococcal Outer Membrane Vesicle Vaccine Given Intranasally Can Induce Immunological Memory and Booster Responses without Evidence of Tolerance

Hilde Bakke, Kristian Lie, Inger Lise Haugen, Gro Ellen Korsvold, E. Arne Høiby, Lisbeth Meyer Næss, Johan Holst, Ingeborg S. Aaberge, Fredrik Oftung, Bjørn Haneberg
Hilde Bakke
Department of Vaccinology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kristian Lie
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Inger Lise Haugen
Department of Vaccinology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gro Ellen Korsvold
Department of Vaccinology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Arne Høiby
Department of Bacteriology, National Institute of Public Health, N-0403 Oslo, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisbeth Meyer Næss
Department of Vaccinology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan Holst
Department of Vaccinology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ingeborg S. Aaberge
Department of Vaccinology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fredrik Oftung
Department of Vaccinology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bjørn Haneberg
Department of Vaccinology and
Department of Microbiology, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.8.5010-5015.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

We have studied the ability of outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccines from Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B to induce vaccine-specific antibody and spleen cell proliferative responses in mice after being administered intranasally (i.n.) and/or subcutaneously (s.c.). A series of four weekly i.n. doses (25 μg) without adjuvant or a single s.c. dose (2.5 μg) with aluminum hydroxide was followed 2 months later by secondary i.n. or s.c. immunizations. After i.n. priming, both immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody responses in serum, measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and IgA antibodies in saliva and extracts of feces were significantly boosted by later i.n. immunizations. The IgG antibody responses in serum were also significantly augmented by secondary s.c. immunization after i.n. as well as s.c. priming. Sera from mice immunized i.n. reached the same level of bactericidal activity as after s.c. immunizations. The s.c. immunizations alone, however, had no effect on mucosal IgA antibody responses, but could prime for booster antibody responses in secretions to later i.n. immunizations. The i.n. immunizations also led to marked OMV-specific spleen cell proliferation in vitro. Both serum antibody responses and spleen cell proliferation were higher after i.n. priming and later s.c. immunizations than after s.c. immunizations alone. There was thus no evidence that i.n. priming had induced immunological tolerance within the B- or T-cell system. Our results indicate that a nonproliferating meningococcal OMV vaccine given i.n. can induce immunological memory and that it may be favorably combined with similar vaccines for injections.

Most pathogens enter the host through the mucosal membranes where the immunological processes are initiated. Vaccines administered directly onto mucosal surfaces are intended to mimic these processes, which include a mucosal immune response, characterized by secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody production not normally induced by parenteral vaccines. Mucosal vaccines consisting of live, attenuated microbes have indeed been shown to effectively induce mucosal as well as systemic immune responses of importance for protection against disease (27). However, since live vaccines may themselves carry some risk of disease, several research groups have focused on the development of nonreplicating mucosal vaccines (18, 26). Results of animal experiments suggest that such vaccines based on microbial components may be effective only if a so-called mucosal adjuvant is added (18). Serious concerns have been raised, however, that nonliving protein material delivered onto mucosal surfaces may induce a state of tolerance (12, 15). It has also been shown during the last few years that even cholera toxin (CT) or its B-subunit, which are strong mucosal adjuvants for induction of antibody responses, may actually be tolerogenic when it comes to T-cell-dependent immunity (14, 24).

We have been able to show that formulations of bacterium- derived particles can induce both local mucosal and systemic antibody responses when applied to various mucosal surfaces of mice (2, 6, 11, 13). With a heat-killed whole-cell pneumococcal vaccine, however, a far better effect was obtained when administered intranasally (i.n.) than when given into either the oral cavity, the stomach, or via rectum into the lower intestine (13). It was also evident that i.n. immunizations with simple suspensions in saline of particles derived from pneumococci, serogroup B streptococci,Bordetella pertussis, and serogroup B meningococci induced very good antibody responses, even without the addition of CT (2, 6, 11, 13). It thus appeared that these particles possessed some kind of self-adjuvanticity.

The immunogenicity of such nonreplicating particles was confirmed by a limited study in humans immunized i.n. with an outer membrane vesicle (OMV) vaccine prepared from group B meningococci (9). The functional ability of the serum antibodies, measured in this study as bactericidal activity, was moreover better than expected from the antibody concentrations measured by conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). It also became evident that the same vaccinees responded with an increase in vaccine-specific T-cell proliferation (21). Simple formulations of particles derived from airway pathogens may therefore represent a model system for development of efficient nonreplicating nasal vaccines.

In the present study, we have focused on the development in mice of immunological memory and the possibility that i.n. or subcutaneous (s.c.) priming with a meningococcal OMV vaccine might lead to booster responses to later i.n. or s.c. immunizations. The aim was furthermore to determine whether intranasal immunizations might be combined with parenteral immunizations and to evaluate the question of immunological tolerance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals.Inbred female BALB/c mice, 8 to 10 weeks old, were obtained from Bomholtgård Breeding and Research Center, Ry, Denmark.

Vaccine preparation.The s.c. vaccine contained OMVs from the epidemic group B meningococcal strain 44/76 (15:P1.7,16) adsorbed onto Al(OH)3. The OMVs were prepared by extraction of bacteria with 0.5% deoxycholate in 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.6) containing 10 mM EDTA and purified by differential centrifugation (7). Each s.c. dose of 200 μl consisted of 2.5 μg of OMVs measured as protein. The nasal vaccine was prepared from the original pool of OMVs used in the s.c. vaccine formulation, but without Al(OH)3. Each nasal dose of 30 μl consisted of 25 μg of OMVs measured as protein.

Immunizations.In order to study antibody responses to OMVs, groups of eight mice were immunized either i.n. four times at weekly intervals with 25 μg of OMVs, without Al(OH)3, or s.c. with a single dose of 2.5 μg of OMVs with Al(OH)3 as adjuvant. The s.c. dose was given at the same time as the second i.n. dose. Two months later, these mice were given a second course of either four i.n. immunizations or a single s.c. dose. Groups of previously unimmunized control mice were then receiving primary immunizations via the i.n. or s.c. routes. The i.n. immunizations were carried out by holding the mice in a supine position with the head down while 30 μl of the antigen solution was delivered slowly with a micropipette onto the nares so that the mouse could sniff it in. The mice were briefly anesthetized intravenously with 0.01 ml (10 mg/ml) of propofol (Diprivan; Zeneca Ltd., Macclesfield Cheshire, United Kingdom) before i.n. immunization, after which they recovered completely within 1 to 2 min. The s.c. vaccine was given without anesthesia.

For the study of primary cellular immune responses to OMVs, groups of 18 mice each were immunized four times i.n. or once s.c., as in the antibody study, whereas one group of nonimmunized mice served as controls. This would allow for the collection of spleens from groups of six mice at three different time points (see below). In order to measure spleen cell proliferative responses to secondary s.c. immunizations, groups of 36 mice were immunized either i.n. or s.c. or not immunized, as described above. This was followed 3 months later by a secondary s.c. dose given to half (18 mice) of the mice in each group, whereas the other half (18 mice) were left unimmunized.

Collection of samples.In both the first and second courses of immunizations to evaluate antibody responses, saliva, feces, and serum were collected before and 1 week after the fourth i.n. dose, corresponding to 3 weeks after the s.c. dose. Saliva was collected with absorbent wicks consisting of synthetic fibers and cellulose (Polyfiltronics Group, Inc., Rockland, Mass.) after a single intraperitoneal injection of 0.1 mg of pilocarpine-HCl (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) in 200 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the net weight was recorded. Two wicks saturated with saliva were obtained from each mouse, frozen at −20°C in 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes, and subsequently extracted with 400 μl of PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 and protease inhibitors, as described previously (8). Three to five pieces of freshly voided feces were collected into 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes, frozen at −20°C, and subsequently vacuum dried in a Speed Vac Concentrator (Savant Instruments, Inc., Farmingdale, N.Y.), before their net dry weights were recorded. Extracts of feces were made by adding 20 μl of PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 and protease inhibitors, per mg of dry feces, as described previously (8). The extraction buffers contained the following protease inhibitors: 0.2 mM 4-(2 aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonylfluoride (Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), 1 μg of aprotinin per ml (Sigma), 10 mM leupeptin (Sigma), and 3.25 mM bestatin (Sigma). Blood was obtained from the lateral femoral vein in heparinized capillary tubes (Vitrex, Herlev, Denmark) and was separated and stored at −20°C until it was analyzed (1). The final blood samples were taken by cardiac puncture during CO2 anesthesia.

Spleen cells for vaccine-specific in vitro proliferative responses to primary immunizations were obtained from six mice at each time point, i.e., after 2, 3, and 4 weeks from the first i.n. vaccine dose, corresponding to, respectively, 1, 2, and 3 weeks after the s.c. immunization. Similarly, spleen samples for proliferative responses to secondary s.c. immunizations, irrespective of their primary immunization scheme, were collected from groups of six mice at 1, 2, and 3 weeks after the secondary s.c. immunization. The mice were anesthetized with CO2, and blood samples were taken by cardiac puncture before the spleens were taken out and put into a medium containing RPMI 1640 and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS).

Quantitation of antibody responses.OMV-specific IgA antibodies in saliva and extracts of feces and OMV-specific IgG antibodies in serum were analyzed by ELISA using Nunc Immuno Plates (MaxiSorp F96; Roskilde, Denmark). ELISA plates were coated for at least 1 week at 4°C with OMVs at 4 μg/ml in 0.1 M Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.6). Nonspecific protein-binding sites were blocked with PBS (pH 7.2) containing 5% skim milk (Oxoid), and after 1 h of incubation at 37°C and 30 min at room temperature, the plates were washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. Serum samples, extracts of saliva and feces, and standard solutions were applied to the ELISA plates (100 μl per well), serially diluted twofold in the blocking solution, and incubated at 4°C overnight. The plates were then washed with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, before being incubated for 1 h at room temperature with peroxidase-conjugated goat antibodies directed against mouse IgA or IgG, both diluted 1:1,000 in blocking buffer (100 μl per well). After washing, bound antibodies were detected witho-phenylenediamine (Sigma) in 0.05 M phosphate citrate buffer (pH 5.0). Optical densities were read at 492 nm in a Titertek Multiscan Plus MK II (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland). Standard curves were generated, and anti-OMV antibody concentrations (in arbitrary units) in unknown samples were determined based on a defined pool of sera or secretions. The unknown samples were corrected for the weights of the original samples and for dilutions made during extraction from wicks and preparation for ELISA.

SBA.The serum bactericidal activity (SBA) assay was performed with an agar overlay method in microtiter plates as described previously (10). In brief, twofold dilutions of sera, starting at 1:2, were tested with a meningococcal inoculum of about 80 to 100 CFU (per well) of the 44/76-SL variant of a B:15:P1.7,16 strain (23), first grown overnight on brain heart infusion agar with 1% horse serum, and then grown for 4 h in 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C on a new plate. Human plasma from an individual without bactericidal antibodies to the strain was used as a complement source (22). Agar was added to the plates after a 30-min incubation of the reaction mixture at 37°C. The numbers of CFU were counted after overnight incubation in 5% CO2 at 37°C. The titers are given as the highest reciprocal final dilution of serum killing more than 50% of the inoculum.

Spleen cell proliferation assay.Spleen cells were prepared according to standard methods. In brief, single-cell suspensions were obtained by mechanical disruption of the spleens. Cells were washed three times in RPMI 1640 (Biowhittaker, Verviers, Belgium) and resuspended in RPMI 1640 complete medium, including FCS (10%) and penicillin and streptomycin (1%). Spleen cells were then seeded in flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Costar, Cambridge, Mass.) at a concentration of 106 cells/well, together with antigen in triplicates. OMVs were added to final concentrations of 1, 0.2, 0.04, and 0.008 μg/ml. The results described are based on the optimal concentration found (0.04 μg/ml). The mitogens phytohemagglutinin and concanavalin A were used as positive controls at final concentrations of 5 μg/ml. Negative control wells received medium only. The final volumes were adjusted to 200 μl/well. After 6 days of incubation in 5% CO2 at 37°C, the cells were pulsed with [3H]thymidine (1.3 μCi/well) (Amersham, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) for 18 h and harvested (Packard Filtermate). Incorporated [3H]thymidine was determined by liquid scintillation counting (Packard TopCount). Proliferative spleen cell responses were expressed as cpm calculated as the mean of triplicate cpm values with antigen − the mean of triplicate cpm values obtained in the absence of antigen.

Statistical analyses.The significance of differences between groups of animals was determined by the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test with PRISM software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, Calif.)

RESULTS

Immunizations i.n. can prime for and boost mucosal and systemic antibody responses.After the first series of four i.n. doses of the OMV vaccine, significant IgG and IgA antibody responses, measured by ELISA, were reached, respectively, in serum (median value, 522 kU/ml) (Fig. 1, upper panel) and saliva and feces (medians, 3.5 kU/ml and 1.1 kU/g, respectively) (Fig.2 and 3, upper panels). The concentrations of antibodies persisted until the next series of four weekly i.n. vaccine doses, after which the concentrations were significantly augmented compared with the responses after primary immunizations alone (serum IgG median, 1,202 kU/ml,P = 0.015; saliva IgA median, 10.9 kU/ml,P = 0.003; feces IgA median, 3.6 kU/g,P = 0.007). The i.n. secondary immunizations could thus boost both serum and mucosal antibody concentrations that had been induced by i.n. priming.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

IgG antibodies to meningococcal OMVs in serum from mice before (Pre) and after (Post) primary and secondary immunizations with four weekly i.n. doses or one s.c. OMV vaccine dose. The results, measured by ELISA, are given as individual values in arbitrary kilounits (kU) per milliliter.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

IgA antibodies to meningococcal OMVs in saliva from mice before (Pre) and after (Post) primary and secondary immunizations with four weekly i.n. doses or one s.c. OMV vaccine dose. The results, measured by ELISA, are given as individual values in arbitrary kilounits (kU) per milliliter.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

IgA antibodies to meningococcal OMVs in extracts of feces from mice before (Pre) and after (Post) primary and secondary immunizations with four weekly i.n. doses or one s.c. OMV vaccine dose. The results, measured by ELISA, are given as individual values in arbitrary kilounits (kU) per gram of dry feces.

In serum, the IgG antibody responses were also significantly augmented by secondary s.c. immunization (median, 2,793 kU/ml), compared to responses after i.n. priming only (P = 0.0002) (Fig. 1, upper panel). These responses to secondary s.c. immunizations did not differ significantly from the responses to secondary i.n. immunizations (P = 0.2). On the other hand, the IgA antibody concentrations in saliva and feces were not influenced by the secondary s.c. immunizations after i.n. priming (Fig. 2 and 3, upper panels). Thus, mucosal immunizations seemed to be necessary to obtain mucosal antibody responses.

Immunizations s.c. can prime for, but not boost, mucosal antibody responses.Primary s.c. immunizations alone induced serum IgG antibody responses (median, 414 kU/ml), but no effect on IgA antibodies could be detected in saliva or feces (Fig. 1 to 3, lower panels). In serum, secondary immunizations by both the i.n. and s.c. routes led to significant booster responses (medians, 6,077 and 2,926 kU/ml, respectively) compared to responses induced by s.c. priming alone (P = 0.0012 and P = 0.0003, respectively) (Fig. 1, lower panel). With these immunization regimens, it appeared that i.n. boosting was just as effective as s.c. boosting following priming via the s.c. route (P = 0.3).

Surprisingly, i.n. secondary immunizations induced strong IgA antibody responses in both saliva and feces after s.c. priming (medians, 8.1 kU/ml and 22.4 kU/g) (Fig. 2 and 3, lower panels). These responses were not different from those obtained after i.n. priming (P> 0.2) and indicate that s.c. immunizations can effectively prime the mucosal immune system for later booster responses to mucosal immunizations. On the other hand, secondary immunizations by the s.c. route did not lead to any measurable mucosal antibody responses. This is in line with the previous observation that mucosal immunizations were of importance for obtaining sizable antibody responses at the mucosal surfaces, whether the mucosal immune system had been primed by s.c. or by mucosal immunizations.

The i.n. immunizations induced serum bactericidal activity at the same level, as did s.c. immunizations.Sera from mice that were primed i.n. showed bactericidal activity in the same range as those from mice primed s.c. (P = 0.3) (Table1). In the i.n. primed group, secondary s.c. immunizations induced significant further increases in bactericidal activity (P = 0.015), whereas secondary i.n. immunizations did not. Significant increases in bactericidal titers were also observed in sera from mice that were primed s.c. and boosted i.n. or s.c. (P = 0.009 and P = 0.04, respectively). After secondary immunizations, there was no significant difference (P = 0.2) in bactericidal titers of the group that had been primed and boosted i.n. from the group that had received s.c. immunizations only.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

SBA in groups of mice after primary and secondary i.n. or s.c. immunizations with meningococcal OMV vaccines

Immunizations i.n. can prime spleen cells for vaccine-specific in vitro proliferation.The spleen cell response of i.n. vaccinated mice increased with each immunization, and 4 weeks after start of the weekly i.n. immunizations, proliferation was significantly higher than in the control group (P = 0.009) (Table 2). In mice immunized once s.c. with adjuvant, proliferation was of the same magnitude as after three i.n. doses without adjuvant (week 3) (P = 0.6).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Vaccine-specific spleen cell proliferation in groups of six mice after primary i.n. or s.c. immunizations with meningococcal OMV vaccinesa

Three months after the primary series of four i.n. OMV vaccine doses (Fig. 4, second column), antigen-specific spleen cell proliferation was still significantly increased (P < 0.0001) compared to the corresponding response obtained with nonimmunized control mice (Fig. 4, last column). This response to i.n. immunizations was significantly higher (P = 0.02) than those obtained 3 months after a primary s.c. immunization (Fig. 4, fourth column). After i.n. priming and secondary s.c. immunization (Fig. 4, first column), however, there was no further increase in response (P = 0.3) compared to i.n. priming alone (Fig. 4, second column). The responses to recent s.c. immunizations after s.c. priming, or with no priming (Fig. 4, third and fifth columns), were lower than those observed in mice that had previously been immunized i.n. (Fig. 4, first column), but were still significantly different (P < 0.05) from those of the control mice (Fig. 4, last column). We also found that the two groups of mice that responded weakly after recent s.c. immunization (Fig. 4, third and fifth columns) had a higher background level (cpm without antigen) than the other groups. In part, this might explain the observation that mice that had been primed and boosted s.c. had lower response levels than the group that had only been primed s.c.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

In vitro vaccine-specific spleen cell proliferation after primary i.n. and primary plus secondary s.c. immunizations of mice with meningococcal OMV vaccines. Four i.n. doses were given at weekly intervals, starting at week 0, and one primary and secondary s.c. dose each was given at weeks 1 and 13. A nonimmunized group of mice served as controls. Samples of spleen cells were collected at weeks 14, 15, and 16 and stimulated for 6 days in vitro with OMVs. The results are given as individual values and as medians (horizontal lines) in cpm after subtraction of background values obtained in the absence of OMVs (Δcpm).

Immunizations i.n. may not induce immunological tolerance.Antibody responses in serum were stronger after i.n. priming and secondary s.c. immunizations (median value, 2,793 kU/ml) (Fig. 1, upper panel) than after priming only via the s.c. route (median, 414 kU/ml) (Fig. 1, lower panel, left). It was thus evident that i.n. immunizations had a positive (P = 0.001) rather than a tolerogenic effect on the systemic antibody responses to later s.c. immunization. Similarly, vaccine-specific spleen cell proliferation was higher in the group that had been primed i.n. and immunized s.c. later than in all other groups that had been immunized s.c. only (P < 0.004) (Fig. 4). Even when the effect of spontaneous proliferation or background activity was not subtracted for, the influence of i.n. immunizations on later responses to s.c. immunizations was still positive (P < 0.005).

DISCUSSION

A vaccine consisting of OMVs from group B meningococci suspended in saline has previously proved to be strongly immunogenic in mice and humans when administered i.n. as drops or spray, even without the use of additional mucosal adjuvants (6, 9, 21). The results of the present study with mice showed that i.n. immunizations with such OMV vaccines could also prime the immune system for both mucosal and systemic booster antibody responses to later repeated i.n. immunizations. This is in agreement with previous observations that mucosal immunizations may lead to immunological memory (17). Moreover, the booster antibody responses in serum to secondary i.n. immunizations without adjuvant were just as prominent as those after s.c. immunizations with adjuvant, whether the priming had been made i.n. or s.c. Also when testing for serum bactericidal activity, i.n. immunizations were just as effective as s.c. immunizations. Thus, it appears that formulations of nonproliferating mucosal vaccines may be favorably combined with traditional injectable vaccines, at least when it comes to systemic antibody responses.

When comparing the antibody responses to vaccines given by different routes, the higher dose of the nasal vaccine compared to the s.c. vaccine has to be taken into account. One reason for this was the increased waste and spillage of nasal drops compared to an injected formulation; another was the lack of additional adjuvant of the nasal vaccine. A small amount of deoxycholate in the OMV preparations might also have an effect on mucosa different from that in the s.c. tissue, although a mucosal vaccine consisting of whole heat-inactivated meningococci devoid of deoxycholate was just as immunogenic as the OMVs. Ongoing experiments indicate, however, that the number of nasal vaccine doses might actually be reduced if time is allowed for immunologic memory to develop (H. Bakke, unpublished observations).

As expected, mucosal antibody responses in the present study were not seen after s.c. immunizations alone. It was surprising, however, that high levels of vaccine-specific antibodies were found in both saliva and feces after s.c. priming followed by i.n. boosting. This finding indicates that the secretory and systemic immune systems are not totally segregated and confirm previous observations that it is possible to prime intestinal immune responses by parenteral immunizations (see reference 3 for review). It may also help explain the observation that mucosal immunizations can induce antibodies at mucosal areas distant from the induction site (4, 8, 13). Although the most prominent antibody responses are found in secretions close to the sites of induction (4, 8, 9), the impact of s.c. priming on intestinal antibody responses to i.n. immunizations in this study is further in favor of a “common” or “regionalized” mucosal immune system (4, 19). At any rate, this observation might be of advantage in the design of future immunization regimes to improve an anticipated protective effect at the mucosal level.

The marked proliferation of spleen cells from mice that had received the OMV vaccine i.n., when exposed to the vaccine antigens in vitro, indicates that T cells had also been primed in vivo by these immunizations. This is in line with previous observations showing an in vitro vaccine-specific proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from humans who had received a similar vaccine i.n. (21). The pronounced increases in proliferation in the present study with the first series of weekly repeated i.n. immunizations suggest that immunological memory might have been induced as well within the T-cell system.

The in vitro spleen cell proliferation in the mice that had received the OMV vaccine s.c. was surprisingly low compared to what was achieved with i.n. immunizations and was not in accordance with the findings in humans, in which the proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was more marked after parenteral than after i.n. immunizations (20, 21). In the present study, the low degree of spleen cell proliferation could in part be explained by a concomitant high background activity (i.e., the spleen cells obtained shortly after s.c. immunizations proliferated spontaneously in vitro without the addition of vaccine antigens). It seemed also that the in vivo priming of spleen cells by s.c. immunizations had a different kinetic pattern than that seen after i.n. immunizations.

Normally, soluble proteins may induce a state of immunological tolerance when administered onto mucosal surfaces (16). However, we found no evidence that the particulate protein vaccine used i.n. in this study had any negative effect on antibody responses upon later exposure to the same antigens via the i.n. or s.c. routes. In fact, it seemed that these responses were not at all hampered by preformed local mucosal or systemic antibodies. Mucosal vaccines may therefore have an advantage over parenteral vaccines that may be less effective in individuals who have preexisting antibodies (e.g., in infants with systemic IgG antibodies derived prenatally)(25).

Previous observations by others have indicated that mucosal vaccines consisting of soluble proteins may also lead to substantial antibody responses, especially when mucosal adjuvants are added, but at the same time to induction of tolerance within the T-cell system (12). Similarly, feeding of CT, which is known as a strong antibody inducer, may result in specific T-cell tolerance when later injected (14). Moreover, the use of the B-subunit of CT as a mucosal adjuvant for antigens fed to test animals has been found to induce T-cell tolerance on later exposure to that antigen (5). In the present study with the OMV vaccine, however, i.n. priming augmented rather than reduced the vaccine-specific spleen cell proliferation in response to later s.c. immunizations. In our hands, therefore, the OMV vaccine did not induce any sort of immunological tolerance. It is tempting to speculate that the reason for this might be the similarity of the bacterium-derived particulate vaccine to the infectious agent itself and the fact that the vaccine is deposited at a mucosal surface to which the proper infectious agent will also attach and colonize. Our results suggest that nonproliferating vaccines based on bacterium-derived particles may be effective when given i.n. and that they may well be used in conjunction with similar vaccines for injection.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Per Brandtzaeg and Libuse Janakova for valuable discussions, and we also thank Bente Møgster, Mona I. Skullerud, Kari E. Løken, Trude Olsen, and Kirsten Konsmo for excellent technical assistance.

Notes

Editor: E. I. Tuomanen

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 28 December 2000.
    • Returned for modification 26 March 2001.
    • Accepted 21 May 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Aaberge I. S.,
    2. Michaelsen T. E.,
    3. Rolstad A. K.,
    4. Groeng E.-C.,
    5. Solberg P.,
    6. Løvik M.
    SCID-Hu mice immunized with a pneumococcal vaccine produce specific human antibodies and show increased resistance to infection.Infect. Immun.60199241464153
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Berstad A. K. H.,
    2. Holst J.,
    3. Møgster B.,
    4. Haugen I. L.,
    5. Haneberg B.
    A nasal whole-cell pertussis vaccine can induce strong systemic and mucosal antibody responses which are not enhanced by cholera toxin.Vaccine15199714731478
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Brandtzaeg P.,
    2. Baklien K.,
    3. Bjerke K.,
    4. Rognum T. O.,
    5. Scott H.,
    6. Valnes K.
    Nature and properties of the human gastrointestinal immune system Immunology of the gastrointestinal tract. Miller K., Nicklin S. 1987 1 85 CRC Press, Inc. Boca Raton, Fla
  4. 4.↵
    1. Brandtzaeg P.,
    2. Farstad I. N.,
    3. Johansen F.-E.,
    4. Morton H. C.,
    5. Norderhaug I. N.,
    6. Yamanaka T.
    The B-cell system of human mucosae and exocrine glands.Immunol. Rev.17119994587
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    1. Czerkinsky C.,
    2. Holmgren J.
    The mucosal immune system and prospects for anti-infectious and anti-inflammatory vaccines.Immunologist3199597103
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Dalseg R.,
    2. Wedege E.,
    3. Holst J.,
    4. Haugen I. L.,
    5. Høiby E. A.,
    6. Haneberg B.
    Outer membrane vesicles from group B meningococci are strongly immunogenic when given intranasally to mice.Vaccine17199923362345
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Fredriksen J. H.,
    2. Rosenqvist E.,
    3. Wedege E.,
    4. Bryn K.,
    5. Bjune G.,
    6. Frøholm L. O.,
    7. Lindbak A.-K.,
    8. Møgster B.,
    9. Namork E.,
    10. Rye U.,
    11. Stabbetorp G.,
    12. Winsnes R.,
    13. Aase B.,
    14. Closs O.
    Production, characterization and control of MenB-vaccine “Folkehelsa”: an outer membrane vesicle vaccine against group B meningococcal disease.NIPH Ann.1419916780
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    1. Haneberg B.,
    2. Kendall D.,
    3. Amerongen H. M.,
    4. Apter F. M.,
    5. Kraehenbuhl J.-P.,
    6. Neutra M. R.
    Induction of specific immunoglobulin A in the small intestine, colon-rectum, and vagina, measured by a new method for collection of secretions from local mucosal surfaces.Infect. Immun.6219941523
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Haneberg B.,
    2. Dalseg R.,
    3. Wedege E.,
    4. Høiby E. A.,
    5. Haugen I. L.,
    6. Oftung F.,
    7. Andersen S. R.,
    8. Næss L. M.,
    9. Aase A.,
    10. Michaelsen T. E.,
    11. Holst J.
    Intranasal administration of a meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine induces persistent local mucosal antibodies and serum antibodies with strong bactericidal activity in humans.Infect. Immun.66199813341341
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Høiby E. A.,
    2. Rosenqvist E.,
    3. Frøholm L. O.,
    4. Bjune G.,
    5. Feiring B.,
    6. Nøkleby H.,
    7. Rønnild E.
    Bactericidal antibodies after vaccination with the Norwegian meningococcal serogroup B outer membrane vesicle vaccine: a brief survey.NIPH Ann.141991147156
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Hordnes K.,
    2. Tynning T.,
    3. Brown T. A.,
    4. Haneberg B.,
    5. Jonsson R.
    Nasal immunization with group B streptococci can induce high levels of specific IgA antibodies in cervicovaginal secretions of mice.Vaccine15199712441251
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. Husby S.,
    2. Mestecky J.,
    3. Moldoveanu Z.,
    4. Holland S.,
    5. Elson C. O.
    Oral tolerance in humans. T cell but not B cell tolerance after antigen feeding.J. Immunol.152199446634670
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. 13.↵
    1. Hvalbye B. K. R.,
    2. Aaberge I. S.,
    3. Løvik M.,
    4. Haneberg B.
    Intranasal immunization with heat-inactivated Streptococcus pneumoniae protects against systemic pneumococcal infection.Infect. Immun.67199943204325
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Kay R. A.,
    2. Ferguson A.
    The immunological consequences of feeding cholera toxin. Feeding cholera toxin suppresses the induction of systemic delayed-type hypersensitivity but not humoral immunity.J. Immunol.661989410415
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    1. Kiyono H.,
    2. Czerkinsky C.
    Consideration of mucosally induced tolerance in vaccine development Mucosal vaccines. Kiyono H., Ogra P. L., McGhee J. R. 1996 89 101 Academic Press San Diego, Calif
  16. 16.↵
    1. Lowrey J. A.,
    2. Savage N. D. L.,
    3. Palliser D.,
    4. Corsin-Jimenez M.,
    5. Forsyth L. M. G.,
    6. Hall G.,
    7. Lindey S.,
    8. Stewart G. A.,
    9. Tan K. A. L.,
    10. Hoyne G. F.,
    11. Lamb J. R.
    Induction of tolerance via the respiratory mucosa.Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol.116199893102
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. Lycke N.,
    2. Holmgren J.
    Long-term cholera antitoxin memory in the gut can be triggered to antibody formation associated with protection within hours of an oral challenge immunization.Scand. J. Immunol.251987407412
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. McGhee J. R.,
    2. Mestecky J.,
    3. Dertzbaugh M. T.,
    4. Eldridge J. H.,
    5. Hirasawa M.,
    6. Kiyono H.
    The mucosal immune system: from fundamental concepts to vaccine development.Vaccine1019927588
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    1. Mestecky J.
    The common mucosal immune system and current strategies for induction of immune responses in external secretions.J. Clin. Immunol.71987265276
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    1. Meyer Næss L.,
    2. Oftung F.,
    3. Aase A.,
    4. Wetzler L. M.,
    5. Sandin R.,
    6. Michaelsen T.
    Human T-cell responses after vaccination with the Norwegian group B meningococcal outer membrane vesicle vaccine.Infect. Immun.661998959965
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Oftung F.,
    2. Næss L. M.,
    3. Wetzler L. M.,
    4. Korsvold G. E.,
    5. Aase A.,
    6. Høiby E. A.,
    7. Dalseg R.,
    8. Holst J.,
    9. Michaelsen T. E.,
    10. Haneberg B.
    Antigen-specific T-cell responses in humans after intranasal immunization with a meningococcal serogroup B outer membrane vesicle vaccine.Infect. Immun.671999921927
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Perkins B. A.,
    2. Jonsdottir K.,
    3. Briem H.,
    4. Griffiths E.,
    5. Plikaytis B. D.,
    6. Høiby E. A.,
    7. Rosenqvist E.,
    8. Holst J.,
    9. Nøkleby H.,
    10. Sotolongo F.,
    11. Sierra G.,
    12. Campa H. C.,
    13. Carlone G. M.,
    14. Williams D.,
    15. Dykes J.,
    16. Kapczynski D.,
    17. Tikhomirov E.,
    18. Wenger J. D.,
    19. Broome C. V.
    Immunogenicity of two efficacious outer membrane protein-based serogroup B meningococcal vaccines among young adults in Iceland.J. Infect. Dis.1771998683691
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Rosenqvist E.,
    2. Høiby E. A.,
    3. Wedege E.,
    4. Bryn K.,
    5. Kolberg J.,
    6. Klem A.,
    7. Rønnild E.,
    8. Bjune G.,
    9. Nøkleby H.
    Human antibody responses to meningococcal outer membrane antigens after three doses of the Norwegian group B meningococcal vaccine.Infect. Immun.63199546424652
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Sun J.-B.,
    2. Rask C.,
    3. Olsson T.,
    4. Holmgren J.,
    5. Czerkinsky C.
    Treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by feeding myelin basic protein conjugated to cholera toxin B subunit.J. Immunol.93199671967201
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    1. van Savage J.,
    2. Decker M. D.,
    3. Edwards K. M.,
    4. Sell S. H.,
    5. Karzon D. T.
    Natural history of pertussis antibody in the infant and effect on vaccine response.J. Infect. Dis.1611990487492
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Walker R. I.
    New strategies for using mucosal vaccination to achieve more effective immunization.Vaccine121994387400
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    1. Weeks-Levy C.,
    2. Ogra P. L.
    Polioviruses and mucosal vaccines Mucosal vaccines. Kiyono H., Ogra P. L., McGhee J. R. 1996 283 294 Academic Press San Diego, Calif
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Meningococcal Outer Membrane Vesicle Vaccine Given Intranasally Can Induce Immunological Memory and Booster Responses without Evidence of Tolerance
Hilde Bakke, Kristian Lie, Inger Lise Haugen, Gro Ellen Korsvold, E. Arne Høiby, Lisbeth Meyer Næss, Johan Holst, Ingeborg S. Aaberge, Fredrik Oftung, Bjørn Haneberg
Infection and Immunity Aug 2001, 69 (8) 5010-5015; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.8.5010-5015.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Meningococcal Outer Membrane Vesicle Vaccine Given Intranasally Can Induce Immunological Memory and Booster Responses without Evidence of Tolerance
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Meningococcal Outer Membrane Vesicle Vaccine Given Intranasally Can Induce Immunological Memory and Booster Responses without Evidence of Tolerance
Hilde Bakke, Kristian Lie, Inger Lise Haugen, Gro Ellen Korsvold, E. Arne Høiby, Lisbeth Meyer Næss, Johan Holst, Ingeborg S. Aaberge, Fredrik Oftung, Bjørn Haneberg
Infection and Immunity Aug 2001, 69 (8) 5010-5015; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.8.5010-5015.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins
Immune Tolerance
Immunologic Memory
Meningococcal Vaccines
Neisseria meningitidis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522