Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Molecular Pathogenesis

Identification of Listeria monocytogenes In Vivo-Induced Genes by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting

Rebecca L. Wilson, A. R. Tvinnereim, Bradley D. Jones, John T. Harty
Rebecca L. Wilson
Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. R. Tvinnereim
Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bradley D. Jones
Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John T. Harty
Department of Microbiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.8.5016-5024.2001
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Listeria monocytogenes is a gram-positive, intracellular, food-borne pathogen capable of causing severe infections in immunocompromised or pregnant individuals, as well as numerous animal species. Genetic analysis of Listeriapathogenesis has identified several genes which are crucial for virulence. The transcription of most of these genes has been shown to be induced upon entry of Listeria into the host cell. To identify additional genes that are induced in vivo and may be required for L. monocytogenes pathogenesis, a fluorescence-activated cell-sorting technique was initiated. Random fragments of the L. monocytogenes chromosome were cloned into a plasmid carrying a promoterless green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene, and the plasmids were transformed into the L. monocytogenes actA mutant DP-L1942. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) was used to isolate L. monocytogenes clones that exhibited increased GFP expression within macrophage-like J774 cells but had relatively low levels of GFP expression when the bacteria were extracellular. Using this strategy, several genes were identified, including actA, that exhibited such an expression profile. In-frame deletions of two of these genes, one encoding the putative L. monocytogenesuracil DNA glycosylase (ung) and one encoding a protein with homology to the Bacillus subtilis YhdP hemolysin-like protein, were constructed and introduced into the chromosome of wild-type L. monocytogenes 10403s. TheL. monocytogenes 10403s ung deletion mutant was not attenuated for virulence in mice, while theyhdP mutant exhibited a three- to sevenfold reduction in virulence.

Listeria monocytogenes is an important bacterial pathogen that causes severe infections in many species of animals, including livestock and humans. The manifestations of listeriosis include encephalomeningitis, septicemia, and abortion in pregnant women (40). L. monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular organism that is able to grow and survive under a wide variety of conditions, including in soil, plants, water, and mammalian tissues, and is widely distributed in the environment (reviewed in reference 16). Thus, L. monocytogenes must be able to sense these different environments and respond to them by regulating the proper repertoire of genes in a manner that ensures the optimal growth of the bacterium.

L. monocytogenes genes have been identified that are required for growth within mammalian cells. Several of these genes are located on the L. monocytogenes chromosome at a single locus. This locus encodes two phospholipases C, PlcA and PlcB, that together enable Listeria to escape both from the primary phagosome after uptake and from the double membrane vesicles formed as a result of cell-to-cell spread (7, 37, 41, 44). Mpl, a metalloprotease that processes PlcB (10, 30), and ActA, an actin polymerization protein necessary for movement ofListeria within the cytoplasm of the host cell and into adjacent cells, are also encoded within this locus (11, 25). Also present is hly, which encodes listeriolysin O (LLO), a hemolysin required for the escape of Listeriafrom both the primary phagosome and the double membrane vesicles formed as a result of cell-to-cell spread (3, 20, 35). The transcriptional regulator of these genes, PrfA, also at this locus, is required for the induction of this important virulence gene cluster during the invasion process (8, 26, 29). In addition, PrfA regulates several other virulence genes, including inlA,inlB, and irpA (inlC), that are located elsewhere on the Listeria chromosome (12, 13, 15, 32).

The importance of these genes in the virulence of Listeriahas been examined in the mouse model of listeriosis. L. monocytogenes harboring mutations in actA(5) or hly (2) exhibits a 1,000- and 10,000-fold increase in 50% lethal dose in the mouse model of infection, while plcA or plcB mutants show a 2- and 20-fold reduction in virulence, respectively (7, 41). Reported 50% lethal doses for irpA(inlC) mutants indicate a 2- to 50-fold reduction in virulence in mice (12, 15). Many of these virulence genes are preferentially expressed when Listeria is within the host cell (6, 18, 33). We initiated a fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) screen in an attempt to identify additional L. monocytogenes genes that are induced in vivo and may also be required for the pathogenesis of this important bacterial pathogen.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmidsBacterial strains, plasmids, and primers used in this study are described in Tables 1 and2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Oligonucleotides used in this study

Bacterial growth and tissue culture. Escherichia coli strains were grown in Luria broth (39).L. monocytogenes strains were grown in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Difco) or tryptic soy broth (Difco). The following antibiotics were used at the indicated concentrations (μg/ml): ampicillin, 100; chloramphenicol, 10; and streptomycin, 50. The murine macrophage-like cell line J774 was grown in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) containing 10% fetal calf serum and supplemented with 2 mMl-glutamine, 5 mm HEPES buffer, 50 μm 2-β-mercaptoethanol, 100 U (each) of penicillin and streptomycin, and 50 μg of gentamicin sulfate per ml (RP10). Cell lines were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 7% CO2.

Plasmid and library construction.The promoterless green fluorescent protein (GFP) shuttle plasmid, pAMGFP, was constructed by restriction digestion of plasmid pGFPmut3 (9) withPstI. The ends were made blunt with T4 DNA polymerase, and the plasmid was digested with BamHI. After agarose gel purification, the GFP-encoding DNA fragment was ligated toBamHI-EcoRV-digested plasmid pAM401 (46), forming plasmid pAMGFP.

Chromosomal DNA was isolated from L. monocytogenes as described (17). To generate a library of random chromosomal Listeria DNA fragments, purified chromosomal DNA was subjected to partial Sau3AI digestion as described (39). The restriction digest products were separated on a low-melting-point agarose gel, and fragments 0.4 to 1 kb in size were isolated by phenol-CHCl3 extraction and ethanol precipitation. These fragments were ligated withBamHI-digested, bacterial alkaline phosphatase-treated plasmid pAMGFP. The ligation mixture was used to transform E. coli strain DH10B by electroporation. Two pools of approximately 8,000 transformants were formed, and plasmid DNA was prepared from the pools using a Qiagen (Valencia, Calif.) plasmid preparation kit. About 85% of transformants contained inserts as determined by restriction enzyme digestion.

Plasmid pLLO-GFP was constructed by PCR amplification of thehly promoter using L. monocytogenes 10403s chromosomal DNA and primers LLOp-5′ and LLOp-3′. The PCR product was phenol-CHCl3 extracted and ethanol precipitated before restriction digestion with BamHI and SalI. The digested hly fragment was gel purified and ligated into the BamHI-SalI site of pAMGFP, forming pLLOGFP.

Electroporation of L. monocytogenes Listeria was made electrocompetent using a method similar to that described by Michel et al. (31). Briefly, an overnight culture of L. monocytogenes was diluted 1/100 into 100 ml of BHI medium and grown to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5 to 0.8. Cells were centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min at 5,000 × g, and the cell pellet was suspended in 30 ml of ice-cold electroporation buffer (816 mM sucrose, 3 mM MgCl2). The centrifugation and suspension steps were repeated two more times, and the final pellet was suspended in 4 ml of electroporation buffer. One hundred microliters of cells was aliquoted into cold Eppendorf tubes and stored at −80°C until needed.

Listeria was electroporated in a cold 0.1-cm gap electroporation cuvette which had been incubated on ice with 2 μl of DNA for 5 min before being subjected to an electrical discharge of 25 μF, 129 Ω, and 1,600 V using a BTX (San Diego, Calif.) electroporator. One milliliter of BHI was added to the cuvette, and the cells were transferred to a new tube. After shaking at 37°C for 1 to 2 h, 200 μl of the culture was plated on BHI medium supplemented with the appropriate antibiotics.

Flow cytometry and FACS.To enrich cultures forListeria expressing GFP within macrophages, 3 × 106 J774 cells were plated in six T25 flasks in RP10 medium lacking antibiotics, and the plates were incubated overnight. Cultures of DP-L1942 transformed with either theListeria GFP library or the promoterless pAMGFP plasmid alone were grown to exponential phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] ≈ 0.1) in BHI containing chloramphenicol and streptomycin. The cultures were centrifuged and suspended in RP10 containing chloramphenicol and streptomycin and were used to infect the J774 cells at an approximate multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 1. After a 2.5-h infection, the medium was removed and RP10 containing gentamicin, chloramphenicol, and streptomycin was added for 1.5 h. The infected macrophages were collected, and the 1% of cells expressing the highest levels of GFP were isolated by FACS using a Coulter EPICS 753 cell sorter at the University of Iowa Flow Cytometry Facility. Approximately 3,000 events were collected, the J774 cells were centrifuged, and the pellet was lysed in 500 μl of 1% Triton X-100 to release the bacteria. After 10 min at room temperature, 500 μl of RP10 was added and the bacteria were plated on BHI agar with chloramphenicol and streptomycin. Approximately 14,000 colonies were pooled (called library A) and frozen in aliquots at −80°C in 30% glycerol. To separate bacteria carrying inducible GFP from those with constitutively expressed GFP, a 200-μl aliquot of library A was thawed and grown in RP10 containing chloramphenicol and streptomycin for 4 h. The culture was sorted by FACS, and the 11% of bacteria expressing the lowest levels of GFP was collected. This sorted population was used to infect J774 cells as described above, and the 0.6% of fluorescent macrophages expressing the highest levels of GFP was collected. The macrophages were lysed and the bacteria were collected as described above. This population of bacteria was termed library B. Individual colonies from library B were tested for in vivo expression of GFP as described below.

In vitro infectionsJ774 cells were plated at 2 × 105/ml in RP10 without antibiotics in 24-well tissue culture plates and grown overnight. Single colonies from library B or the control strain DP-L1942(pAMGFP) were grown overnight and subcultured 1:50 the following day into BHI medium containing chloramphenicol and streptomycin. After 1 to 2 h of growth at 37°C, 500 μl of culture was used to infect J774 cells (MOI, ∼200). Following a 1.5-h incubation at 37°C the J774 cells were washed one time with phosphate-buffered saline, and 1 ml of RP10 containing gentamicin (50 μg/ml) was added for another 2.5 h. The infected J774 cells were lifted using a cell scraper and transferred to tubes suitable for flow cytometry analysis.

DNA sequence analysisPlasmids were isolated from Listeria clones using Qiagen plasmid mini prep kits according to the manufacturer's instructions except that 15 μl of lysozyme (50 mg/ml) was added to 250 μl of cell suspension buffer, and cells were incubated 2 to 24 h before proceeding. The DNA sequences of in vivo-induced Listeria promoters were determined using a primer specific for the gfp gene (GFP-3′) in plasmid pAMGFP or primers designed from the determined DNA sequence of the individual clones. Sequencing was done at the University of Iowa DNA Core Facility. Homology searches were performed using the databases at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ).

Mutant constructionTo construct anL. monocytogenes uracil DNA glycosylase (ung) mutant, a plasmid clone (pG1-E1) containing the entire ung gene was identified in a previously constructed L. monocytogenes 10403s library (27) using PCR with primers specific forung: 117–5′2 and 117–3′. The DNA sequence of the region upstream and downstream of ung and that of the entire ung gene were determined. Primers specific for plasmid pAMGFP (GFP-5′) and 157 bp downstream of the predicted ATG start codon of ung (117-BamHI) were constructed and used to PCR amplify the 5′ region of ungusing plasmid DNA from clone 117 as a template. This PCR product was digested with EcoRI and BamHI restriction enzymes and gel purified. The 3′ region of ung was PCR amplified using primers 117–5′3 and 117-PstI with plasmid pG1-E1 as a template. The PCR product was digested withPstI and Sau3AI restriction enzymes and gel purified. These two PCR products were used in a triple ligation to plasmid pKSV-7 that had been digested with EcoRI andPstI and gel purified. The resulting clone was designated p117/KSV and contains a 68-amino-acid in-frame deletion (amino acids 53 to 121) of the predicted 228-amino-acid UDG protein. Plasmid p117/KSV was used to transform electrocompetent L. monocytogenes 10403s, and transformants were selected on BHI medium containing chloramphenicol and streptomycin at 30°C. Integration of this temperature-sensitive plasmid into the chromosome and resolution of the plasmid were performed as previously described (7). The resulting chloramphenicol-sensitive colonies were screened by PCR using primers 117–5′BamHI and 117-PstI to identify those which contained theung deletion in the proper chromosomal location.

To construct the L. monocytogenes yhdP mutant, a plasmid clone (p10A3) containing the entire yhdP gene was identified in the L. monocytogenes 10403s library (27) using primers 104–5′ and 104–3′. The DNA sequence of yhdP and the surrounding regions was determined. Plasmid p10A3 was used as a template to PCR amplify the 5′ region ofyhdP using primers 104–5′ and 104-BamHI. The PCR product was digested with HindIII andBamHI restriction enzymes and gel purified. The 3′ region of yhdP was PCR amplified using primers 104-BglII and 104-EcoRI with plasmid p10A3 as a template. The PCR product was digested withEcoRI and Sau3AI restriction enzymes and gel purified. These two PCR products were used in a triple ligation toHindIII-EcoRI-digested pKSV-7. The resulting clone was designated p104/KSV and contains a 104-amino-acid in-frame deletion (amino acids 151 to 255) within the predicted 457-amino-acid L. monocytogenes YhdP protein. Introduction of plasmid p104/KSV into L. monocytogenes10403s and construction of the chromosomal yhdP deletion mutant were as described above. The presence of the yhdPdeletion in the Listeria chromosome was confirmed by PCR using primers 104–5′ and 104-EcoRI.

Mouse virulence studiesBacteria were grown overnight in BHI medium, subcultured 1:1,000 in BHI medium the following day, and grown to an OD600 of ∼0.1. Bacteria were centrifuged and suspended at 105 CFU/ml in pyrogen-free saline. Groups of BALB/c mice (National Cancer Institute) were infected intravenously with 4 × 104L. monocytogenes organisms in a 0.2-ml volume. Three days postchallenge the number of CFU in the spleen and liver of the infected animals was determined by homogenizing tissues in 0.2% IGEPAL (Sigma) and plating dilutions of the suspension on BHI agar containing streptomycin.

RESULTS

Construction of a gram-positive shuttle plasmid encoding a promoterless GFP.A plasmid encoding a promoterless GFP gene was constructed by inserting DNA encoding the Aequorea victoria GFP from plasmid pGFPmut3 into the gram-positive shuttle plasmid pAM401 (46) (Fig.1). pGFPmut3 encodes a mutated form of GFP that exhibits maximal excitation and emission wavelengths at 501 and 511 nm, respectively, and is useful for applications utilizing flow cytometry (9). To test whether an in vivo-inducedListeria promoter could drive expression of GFP from this plasmid (pAMGFP), the hly promoter was cloned into theBamHI site of pAMGFP. Expression of hly is known to be induced immediately after L. monocytogenes enters the host cell (6, 33). This plasmid, called pLLOGFP, was introduced into the attenuated actA mutant DP-L1942 (5). The actA mutant was chosen for these studies because we reasoned that if L. monocytogenes could not spread from the initially infected cells into adjacent cells, the bacteria would accumulate, and the host cells containing the GFP-expressing bacteria would be more fluorescent due to increased numbers of bacteria. DP-L1942(pLLOGFP) was used to infect J774 cells, a macrophage-like cell line. As shown in Fig.2, J774 cells infected with DP-L1942(pLLOGFP) exhibited higher fluorescence than the same cells infected with DP-L1942(pAMGFP). Hence, the level of expression of GFP from plasmid pAMGFP containing an in vivo-induced L. monocytogenes promoter is sufficient to distinguish fluorescent from nonfluorescent infected macrophages.

Fig. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Construction of plasmid pAMGFP. A promoterlessgfp mut3 gene encoding the A. victoriaGFP was removed from plasmid pGFPmut3 (9) and ligated into the BamHI-EcoRV sites of plasmid pAM401 (46). Sau3AI fragments of theListeria 10403s chromosome were ligated into theBamHI site of pAMGFP to construct the library used for FACS for in vivo-induced promoters.

Fig. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Expression of pLLOGFP by L. monocytogenesincreases the fluorescence of infected J774 cells. L. monocytogenes DP-L1942 containing plasmid pAMGFP or plasmid pLLOGFP was used to infect J774 cells at an MOI of 10. After 4 h, the infected J774 cells were analyzed by flow cytometry.

FACS for in vivo-induced L. monocytogenesgenes.To identify in vivo-induced genes, a library of random,Sau3AI-digested L. monocytogenes DNA fragments was cloned into pAMGFP, and the library was introduced into theactA mutant DP-L1942. Approximately 5,600 different transformants were pooled. With an average DNA fragment size of 600 bp and a probability of 95%, this library was calculated to represent about one-fourth of the Listeria chromosome. A technique similar to that developed by Valdivia and Falkow forSalmonella (43) was employed to identify in vivo-induced L. monocytogenes genes by FACS. The first sort was performed on J774 cells that had been infected for 4 h with the pooled L. monocytogenes containing the GFP library (Fig.3A). The 1% of macrophages exhibiting the highest fluorescence was collected and lysed to isolate the infecting bacteria. A second sort was done on the released bacteria after growth in tissue culture medium alone (Fig. 3B), and the 11% of bacteria with the lowest fluorescence was collected. This step was performed to remove those bacteria from the population that constitutively expressed GFP. J774 cells were infected with this population of bacteria exhibiting low extracellular fluorescence, and a final sort was done to collect the 0.6% of fluorescent macrophages with the highest GFP expression (Fig. 3C). Bacteria released from this population of macrophages should be enriched for those containing plasmids carrying in vivo-induced promoters.

Fig. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

FACS for in vivo-induced promoters. (A) Fluorescence of J774 cells infected with DP-L1942 (actA) containing the pAMGFP library. The solid line indicates that the sorting gate was set to collect the 1% of cells expressing the highest fluorescence. (B) Fluorescence of the population of bacteria released from the macrophages sorted in the step depicted in panel A. The 11% of bacteria expressing the lowest fluorescence was collected. (C) Fluorescence of J774 cells infected with bacteria from the step depicted in panel B. The line indicates that the sorting gate was set to collect the 0.6% of cells expressing the highest GFP.

Identification of sorted L. monocytogenes clones encoding potential in vivo-induced genes.In order to identify the individual Listeria clones that contain plasmids carrying in vivo-induced genes, isolated clones were grown in BHI medium and used to infect J774 macrophages. Those clones that caused increased fluorescence of J774 cells after a 4-h infection but were not fluorescent in BHI medium, as compared to Listeriacontaining a promoterless GFP plasmid, were identified as potential candidates (Fig. 4). Some selected clones had GFP expression profiles that showed no induction in BHI medium and substantial induction within J774 cells (clones 117, 136, and 159). Other clones had a partially induced population when the bacteria were grown in BHI medium, while both populations showed further induction within J774 cells (clones 44, 53, 98, 104, 107, and 154). The remaining clones showed either no induction of GFP in BHI medium or within J774 cells or constitutive expression of GFP (clone 8) under either growth condition. Of 167 isolates tested, 42 clones were selected that showed low levels of GFP expression in BHI medium and higher levels of GFP expression within J774 cells, and the DNA sequence of the region immediately upstream of GFP was determined. These clones and their closest homologues are listed in Table 3. Seventeen of the plasmids encoded a 5′ sequence identical to that encoded by the in vivo-induced L. monocytogenes actA gene, which confirms the validity of the cell-sorting technique as a means of identifying in vivo-induced promoter fragments.

Fig. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Flow cytometry analysis of individual clones expressing GFP. Overnight cultures of isolated clones were subcultured into fresh BHI medium (containing streptomycin and chloramphenicol) and grown to an OD600 of approximately 0.1. These cultures were used to infect J774 cells at an MOI of approximately 200 and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. The inoculating cultures (BHI) and the infected J774 cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, and their fluorescence is shown (in black) relative to DP-L1942 containing the promoterless pAMGFP plasmid (in grey). The numbers represent the numbers of the individual clones. The fluorescence of bacteria containing the actA promoter in the GFPfusion plasmid that was isolated during the enrichment and the fluorescence of bacteria containing plasmid pLLOGFP are shown for reference. Clone 8 is a representative clone that expressed GFP both in BHI medium and within J774 cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

L. monocytogenes loci induced within J774 macrophages

Construction of Listeria chromosomal mutants and virulence studies.We wished to determine whether some of theL. monocytogenes in vivo-induced genes identified in our screen were required for virulence in mice. In-frame deletion mutations of the yhdP (clone 104) and ung (clone 117) genes were constructed and introduced into the chromosome of wild-type 10403sL. monocytogenes. The yhdP gene was chosen because of its intriguing homology to the Rickettsia typhi TlyC hemolysin (36) and hemolysin-like homologues (Fig. 5). InE. coli, the function of uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), the product of the ung gene, is to remove uracil residues that have been misincorporated into DNA as a result of the deamination of cytosine to uracil (28). DNA damage could potentially occur within the environment of the host cell phagosome through the action of nitric oxide and the products of the respiratory burst (45). Growth curves determined for the Listeria yhdP and ung mutants indicated that they had no apparent growth defects in rich broth culture (not shown). The mutants were inoculated into BALB/c mice intravenously, and CFU assays were performed on the livers and spleens after 3 days of infection. Figure6 demonstrates that a nearly sevenfold decrease in CFU in livers and a threefold decrease in CFU in spleens were measured when mice were infected with the L. monocytogenes yhdP mutant, as compared to those infected with wild-type L. monocytogenes. Deletion of the L. monocytogenes unggene did not appear to have a demonstrable effect on virulence in the mouse model of L. monocytogenes infection (data not shown).

Fig. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

ClustalW 1.8 alignment (22) and box shade analysis of the B. subtilis YhdP (accession no. 007585), R. typhi TlyC (accession no. AAC62436 ), andL. monocytogenes YhdP (clone 104) protein sequences. The boxed gray shading indicates identical protein residues and the boxed light shading indicates similar protein residues.

Fig. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

An L. monocytogenes yhdP mutant is attenuated in the mouse model of infection. L. monocytogenes 10403s and L. monocytogenes 10403syhdP were used to infect groups of BALB/c mice intravenously with 2 × 104 to 4 × 104L. monocytogenesorganisms. Data represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (error bars) of CFU per organ from organs of nine mice pooled from three separate experiments. Student'st test was used in statistical analysis. The numbers of CFU per liver (P < 0.005) and per spleen (P < 0.025) in yhdPmutant-infected mice were reduced compared to those in L. monocytogenes 10403s-infected mice.

DISCUSSION

Using a FACS technique similar to that developed by Valdivia and Falkow (43), we have identified several L. monocytogenes genes that appear to be induced when the bacteria are in the intracellular environment of a macrophage. Several clones that were isolated contained DNA from the L. monocytogenes actA gene, which encodes one of the proteins necessary for the nucleation of host cell actin and motility of Listeriawithin the host cell. The actA gene is induced about 200-fold in vivo (33). This result provides strong support for the validity of this method for identifying Listeriagenes that are expressed within macrophages. One advantage of using promoter trap systems as described here is that plasmid reporter gene fusions are utilized, and these do not depend upon inactivation of the chromosomal locus, which could lead to the selective isolation of only certain genes or polar effects on downstream genes. A potential limitation of a multicopy-plasmid-based system is, however, that it could conceivably limit the sensitivity of the system by titrating factors required for gene induction.

For the FACS technique to be successful, it is likely that high levels of expression of GFP from the plasmids are necessary to achieve efficient separation of fluorescent from nonfluorescent bacteria. In some systems, the conditions for enrichment of in vivo-induced genes may need to be altered from the original method described (43). For example, a screen for Mycobacterium marinum in vivo-induced genes was described in which a step to isolate bacterium-containing vesicles from infected macrophages was included (1). This allowed the isolation of weak promoter-GFP fusions and contributed to the success of the enrichment. In this study we utilized a Listeria actA mutant to allow the bacteria to accumulate within the host cell and thus increase the fluorescence of macrophages infected with GFP-expressingListeria. Another change from the original protocol was that individual clones were screened for GFP expression while still within the macrophage. We found this necessary because it was difficult to differentiate the fluorescent bacteria from the lysed macrophage cell debris. Because the cell debris was similar in size but not fluorescent, this resulted in a measured decrease in fluorescence of the bacterial population after passage through macrophages. This decrease was seen even with bacteria containing theactA::GFP fusion plasmid. Although these differences in the protocol may have limited our selection of positive clones, they most likely contributed to the success of the enrichment.

This study identified several L. monocytogenes genes that are induced within the host cell. One of these was the L. monocytogenes bvrA gene, which encodes an antiterminator forbvr (clone 53) (Table 3). The bvr locus was previously shown to be necessary for repression of virulence genes (plcB) when Listeria is grown in the presence of β-glucosides (4). It is postulated that β-glucosides are present in plant-rich soil, and Listeria would most likely repress virulence genes in this environment. In response to appropriate signals, the BvrA protein is activated to allow transcription of the downstream bvrBC genes, which encode a β-glucoside-specific enzyme II permease and a putative ADP-ribosylglycohydrolase. We do not understand the apparent contradiction between the fact that expression of the bvrlocus is required for repression of plcB and that an activator of bvr was identified in our screen as an in vivo-induced gene. However, it is interesting that an E. coli i484 in vivo expression technology screen identifiedbglF as a gene that is induced within the mouse liver (23). bglF encodes the β-glucoside-specific phosphotransferase transport system (PTS) protein for E. coli. Further studies are required to understand the contribution of the bvr locus to the intracellular growth of L. monocytogenes.

A screen for Listeria in vivo-induced genes performed by Gahan and Hill (19) identified a gene homologous to that encoding the E. coli cellobiose transporter CelB, a PTS enzyme II. We also identified another phosphotransferase enzyme II component homologue for the E. coli mannose permease system (clone 159) as an in vivo-induced gene. Although it has been hypothesized that the high-energy PTS systems may be downregulated due to the unavailability of their transported carbon sources in vivo (38), the regulation of the carbon utilization systems is most likely complex. One clone that was isolated at least 10 times showed homology to the Bacillus subtilis xylose repressor protein. This clone (clone 44) showed various degrees of GFP expression in BHI medium alone but high GFP expression levels within J774 macrophages. A screen for virulence factors in Streptococcus pneumoniae identified a gene showing homology to a Borrelia burgdorferi xylose operon regulatory protein (34). The function of the XylR-like protein in Listeria is not known, but the isolation of the clone containing xylR-like sequences may be another indication of the importanceListeria places on regulating genes involved in carbohydrate utilization during invasion of mammalian cells. Carbon sources available within the environment of the host cell may signal for the increased expression of certain permeases in order forListeria to utilize those energy sources.

Another gene, one encoding a putative UDG, was also identified in this screen. Because the regulation of the ung fusion appeared very similar to that of the actA (i.e., no expression in BHI and significant induction within macrophages) (Fig. 4) and because of the role of UDG in DNA repair (28), we constructed anL. monocytogenes ung mutant. However, this ungmutant was not attenuated for virulence in mice. Thus, not all in vivo-induced genes play a required role in pathogenesis.

Clone 104 contained DNA encoding a protein most similar to a hypothetical B. subtilis hemolysin-like protein, YhdP. A motif search of the amino acid sequence of this protein using the Prosite analogue revealed probable integral membrane structures (90% similarity to ABC-2-type transport system integral membrane proteins). An R. typhi hemolysin (TlyC), capable of lysing sheep erythrocytes, has been identified (36), and this protein is 54% similar to the Listeria YhdP protein (Fig.5). Listeria contains one well-characterized sulfhydryl-dependent hemolysin, LLO, that is capable of lysing sheep erythrocytes (21). As L. monocytogenes hly mutants are nonhemolytic on blood agar plates, it is not likely that the yhdP locus encodes anotherListeria hemolysin capable of red blood cell lysis under those conditions. Because of the homology of YhdP to hemolysin-like proteins, we constructed an in-frame chromosomal deletion of this gene in L. monocytogenes 10403s and tested its effect on virulence in mice. The yhdP mutant was attenuated approximately three- to sevenfold in mice compared to its wild-type parent (Fig. 6). This measured decrease in virulence, although small, was reproducible. Mice infected with the yhdP mutant looked noticeably healthier than those infected with the wild-type parent strain. It may be that YhdP shares overlapping roles with another protein as has been shown for the phospholipases PlcA and PlcB. Single mutations in either of these genes decrease virulence only slightly, while a plcA plcB double mutant is severely attenuated (41). Defining the function of the YhdP protein inListeria awaits further experimentation.

Aside from actA, other previously identified L. monocytogenes in vivo-induced genes were not isolated. This could be due to the fact that the GFP plasmid library that was used is only a partial representation of the L. monocytogenes chromosome (see Materials and Methods). It is also possible that Sau3AI digestion created a bias against the formation of productive GFP fusions to other known in vivo-induced promoters. Libraries constructed with different restriction enzymes or DNases might identify additional genes when this method is used. Alternatively, it is possible that the isolation of actA promoters, but not other known in vivo-induced promoters, was so successful because of its high level of in vivo expression, a criterion that may be very important for the sorting step of this type of enhancement.

In conclusion, our results show that the FACS technique is a powerful tool for identifying potential in vivo-induced genes in gram-positive as well as gram-negative bacteria. The sequencing of theListeria genome has been completed. This information should rapidly advance our understanding of Listeria pathogenesis. However, it is evident from these and other studies (14, 19, 24) that it is not always obvious which proteins are involved in the intracellular survival of a pathogen, and complementary biological studies are required to elucidate the complex interplay between a pathogenic microbe and its host.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Laurel Lenz for the Listeria plasmid library, Dan Portnoy for sharing plasmids and strains, and Steve Libby for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Douglas White, Justin Fishbaugh, and Gene Hess for help with the flow cytometry and cell sorting.

This work was supported by NIH grants AI36864 and AI42767 to J.T.H., AI38268 to B.D.J., and USDA/CREES/NRICGP grant 9602300 to R.L.W. R.L.W. is supported by NIH postdoctoral training grant HL07638, and A.R.T. is supported by NIH postdoctoral training grant T32 AI07620.

Notes

Editor: V. J. DiRita

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 20 November 2000.
    • Returned for modification 20 February 2001.
    • Accepted 10 May 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Barker L. P.,
    2. Brooks D. M.,
    3. Small P. L.
    The identification of Mycobacterium marinum genes differentially expressed in macrophage phagosomes using promoter fusions to green fluorescent protein.Mol. Microbiol.29199811671177
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    1. Barry R. A.,
    2. Bouwer H. G.,
    3. Portnoy D. A.,
    4. Hinrichs D. J.
    Pathogenicity and immunogenicity of Listeria monocytogenes small-plaque mutants defective for intracellular growth and cell-to-cell spread.Infect. Immun.60199216251632
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Beauregard K. E.,
    2. Lee K. D.,
    3. Collier R. J.,
    4. Swanson J. A.
    pH-dependent perforation of macrophage phagosomes by listeriolysin O from Listeria monocytogenes.J. Exp. Med.186199711591163
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Brehm K.,
    2. Ripio M.-T.,
    3. Kreft J.,
    4. Vàzquez-Boland J.-A.
    The bvr locus of Listeria monocytogenes mediates virulence gene repression by β-glucosides.J. Bacteriol.181199950245032
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Brundage R. A.,
    2. Smith G. A.,
    3. Camilli A.,
    4. Theriot J. A.,
    5. Portnoy D. A.
    Expression and phosphorylation of the Listeria monocytogenes ActA protein in mammalian cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9019931189011894
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bubert A.,
    2. Sokolovic Z.,
    3. Chun S. K.,
    4. Papatheodorou L.,
    5. Simm A.,
    6. Goebel W.
    Differential expression of Listeria monocytogenes virulence genes in mammalian host cells.Mol. Gen. Genet.2611999323336
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    1. Camilli A.,
    2. Tilney L. G.,
    3. Portnoy D. A.
    Dual roles of plcA in Listeria monocytogenes pathogenesis.Mol. Microbiol.81993143157
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    1. Chakraborty T.,
    2. Leimeister W. M.,
    3. Domann E.,
    4. Hartl M.,
    5. Goebel W.,
    6. Nichterlein T.,
    7. Notermans S.
    Coordinate regulation of virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes requires the product of the prfA gene.J. Bacteriol.1741992568574
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    1. Cormack B. P.,
    2. Valdivia R. H.,
    3. Falkow S.
    FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP).Gene17319963338
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    1. Domann E.,
    2. Leimeister W. M.,
    3. Goebel W.,
    4. Chakraborty T.
    Molecular cloning, sequencing, and identification of a metalloprotease gene from Listeria monocytogenes that is species specific and physically linked to the listeriolysin gene.Infect. Immun.5919916572
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Domann E.,
    2. Wehland J.,
    3. Rohde M.,
    4. Pistor S.,
    5. Hartl M.,
    6. Goebel W.,
    7. Leimeister-Wachter M.,
    8. Wuenscher M.,
    9. Chakraborty T.
    A novel bacterial virulence gene in Listeria monocytogenes required for host cell microfilament interaction with homology to the proline-rich region of vinculin.EMBO J.11199219811990
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    1. Domann E.,
    2. Zechel S.,
    3. Lingnau A.,
    4. Hain T.,
    5. Darji A.,
    6. Nichterlein T.,
    7. Wehland J.,
    8. Chakraborty T.
    Identification and characterization of a novel PrfA-regulated gene in Listeria monocytogenes whose product, IrpA, is highly homologous to internalin proteins, which contain leucine-rich repeats.Infect. Immun.651997101109
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. Dramsi S.,
    2. Kocks C.,
    3. Forestier C.,
    4. Cossart P.
    Internalin-mediated invasion of epithelial cells by Listeria monocytogenes is regulated by the bacterial growth state, temperature and the pleiotropic activator PrfA.Mol. Microbiol.91993931941
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    1. Dubail I.,
    2. Berche P.,
    3. Charbit A.
    Listeriolysin O as a reporter to identify constitutive and in vivo-inducible promoters in the pathogen Listeria monocytogenes.Infect. Immun.68200032423250
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Engelbrecht F.,
    2. Chun S. K.,
    3. Ochs C.,
    4. Hess J.,
    5. Lottspeich F.,
    6. Goebel W.,
    7. Sokolovic Z.
    A new PrfA-regulated gene of Listeria monocytogenes encoding a small, secreted protein which belongs to the family of internalins.Mol. Microbiol.211996823837
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    1. Farber J. M.,
    2. Peterkin P. I.
    Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne pathogen.Microbiol. Rev.551991476511
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Flamm R. K.,
    2. Hinrichs D. J.,
    3. Thomashow M. F.
    Introduction of pAM beta 1 into Listeria monocytogenes by conjugation and homology between native L. monocytogenes plasmids.Infect. Immun.441984157161
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. Freitag N. E.,
    2. Jacobs K. E.
    Examination of Listeria monocytogenes intracellular gene expression by using the green fluorescent protein of Aequorea victoria.Infect. Immun.67199918441852
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    1. Gahan C. G.,
    2. Hill C.
    The use of listeriolysin to identify in vivo induced genes in the gram-positive intracellular pathogen Listeria monocytogenes.Mol. Microbiol.362000498507
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Gedde M. M.,
    2. Higgins D. E.,
    3. Tilney L. G.,
    4. Portnoy D. A.
    Role of listeriolysin O in cell-to-cell spread of Listeria monocytogenes.Infect. Immun.6820009991003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Geoffroy C.,
    2. Gaillard J. L.,
    3. Alouf J. E.,
    4. Berche P.
    Purification, characterization, and toxicity of the sulfhydryl-activated hemolysin listeriolysin O from Listeria monocytogenes.Infect. Immun.55198716411646
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Jeanmougin F.,
    2. Thompson J. D.,
    3. Gouy M.,
    4. Higgins D. G.,
    5. Gibson T. J.
    Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal X.Trends Biochem. Sci.231998403405
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    1. Khan M. A.,
    2. Isaacson R. E.
    In vivo expression of the beta-glucoside (bgl) operon of Escherichia coli occurs in mouse liver.J. Bacteriol.180199847464749
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Klarsfeld A. D.,
    2. Goossens P. L.,
    3. Cossart P.
    Five Listeria monocytogenes genes preferentially expressed in infected mammalian cells: plcA, purH, purD, pyrE and an arginine ABC transporter gene, arpJ.Mol. Microbiol.131994585597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    1. Kocks C.,
    2. Gouin E.,
    3. Tabouret M.,
    4. Berche P.,
    5. Ohayon H.,
    6. Cossart P.
    L. monocytogenes-induced actin assembly requires the actA gene product, a surface protein.Cell681992521531
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    1. Leimeister-Wachter M.,
    2. Haffner C.,
    3. Domann E.,
    4. Goebel W.,
    5. Chakraborty T.
    Identification of a gene that positively regulates expression of listeriolysin, the major virulence factor of Listeria monocytogenes.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA87199083368340
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. 27.↵
    1. Lenz L. L.,
    2. Dere B.,
    3. Bevan M. J.
    Identification of an H2–M3-restricted Listeria epitope: implications for antigen presentation by M3.Immunity519966372
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    1. Lindahl T.
    An N-glycosidase from Escherichia coli that releases free uracil from DNA containing deaminated cytosine residues.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA71197436493653
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Mengaud J.,
    2. Dramsi S.,
    3. Gouin E.,
    4. Vazquez-Boland J. A.,
    5. Milon G.,
    6. Cossart P.
    Pleiotropic control of Listeria monocytogenes virulence factors by a gene that is autoregulated.Mol. Microbiol.5199122732283
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    1. Mengaud J.,
    2. Geoffroy C.,
    3. Cossart P.
    Identification of a new operon involved in Listeria monocytogenes virulence: its first gene encodes a protein homologous to bacterial metalloproteases.Infect. Immun.59199110431049
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Michel E.,
    2. Reich K. A.,
    3. Favier R.,
    4. Berche P.,
    5. Cossart P.
    Attenuated mutants of the intracellular bacterium Listeria monocytogenes obtained by single amino acid substitutions in listeriolysin O.Mol. Microbiol.4199021672178
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    1. Milohanic E.,
    2. Pron B.,
    3. Berche P.,
    4. Gaillard J. L.
    Identification of new loci involved in adhesion of Listeria monocytogenes to eukaryotic cells.Microbiology1462000731739
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Moors M. A.,
    2. Levitt B.,
    3. Youngman P.,
    4. Portnoy D. A.
    Expression of listeriolysin O and ActA by intracellular and extracellular Listeria monocytogenes.Infect. Immun.671999131139
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    1. Polissi A.,
    2. Pontiggia A.,
    3. Feger G.,
    4. Altieri M.,
    5. Mottl H.,
    6. Ferrari L.,
    7. Simon D.
    Large-scale identification of virulence genes from Streptococcus pneumoniae.Infect. Immun.66199856205629
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Portnoy D. A.,
    2. Jacks P. S.,
    3. Hinrichs D. J.
    Role of hemolysin for the intracellular growth of Listeria monocytogenes.J. Exp. Med.167198814591471
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    1. Radulovic S.,
    2. Troyer J. M.,
    3. Beier M. S.,
    4. Lau A. O.,
    5. Azad A. F.
    Identification and molecular analysis of the gene encoding Rickettsia typhi hemolysin.Infect Immun.67199961046108
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    1. Raveneau J.,
    2. Geoffroy C.,
    3. Beretti J. L.,
    4. Gaillard J. L.,
    5. Alouf J. E.,
    6. Berche P.
    Reduced virulence of a Listeria monocytogenes phospholipase-deficient mutant obtained by transposon insertion into the zinc metalloprotease gene.Infect. Immun.601992916921
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    1. Ripio M. T.,
    2. Brehm K.,
    3. Lara M.,
    4. Suárez M.,
    5. Vázquez-Boland J. A.
    Glucose-1-phosphate utilization by Listeria monocytogenes is PrfA dependent and coordinately expressed with virulence factors.J. Bacteriol.179199771747180
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Sambrook J.,
    2. Fritsch E. F.,
    3. Maniatis T.
    Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual 2nd ed. 1989 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y
  40. 40.↵
    1. Schuchat A.,
    2. Swaminathan B.,
    3. Broome C. V.
    Epidemiology of human listeriosis.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.41991169183
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    1. Smith G. A.,
    2. Marquis H.,
    3. Jones S.,
    4. Johnston N. C.,
    5. Portnoy D. A.,
    6. Goldfine H.
    The two distinct phospholipases C of Listeria monocytogenes have overlapping roles in escape from a vacuole and cell-to-cell spread.Infect. Immun.63199542314237
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.
    1. Smith K.,
    2. Youngman P.
    Use of a new integrational vector to investigate compartment-specific expression of the Bacillus subtilis spoIIM gene.Biochimie741992705711
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Valdivia R. H.,
    2. Falkow S.
    Fluorescence-based isolation of bacterial genes expressed within host cells.Science277199720072011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. 44.↵
    1. Vázquez-Boland J. A.,
    2. Kocks C.,
    3. Dramsi S.,
    4. Ohayon H.,
    5. Geoffroy C.,
    6. Mengaud J.,
    7. Cossart P.
    Nucleotide sequence of the lecithinase operon of Listeria monocytogenes and possible role of lecithinase in cell-to-cell spread.Infect. Immun.601992219230
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    1. Wink D. A.,
    2. Kasprzak K. S.,
    3. Maragos C. M.,
    4. Elespuru R. K.,
    5. Misra M.,
    6. Dunams T. M.,
    7. Cebula T. A.,
    8. Koch W. H.,
    9. Andrews A. W.,
    10. Allen J. S.,
    11. et al.
    DNA deaminating ability and genotoxicity of nitric oxide and its progenitors.Science254199110011003
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    1. Wirth R.,
    2. An F. Y.,
    3. Clewell D. B.
    Highly efficient protoplast transformation system for Streptococcus faecalis and a new Escherichia coli-S. faecalis shuttle vector.J. Bacteriol.1651986831836
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Identification of Listeria monocytogenes In Vivo-Induced Genes by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
Rebecca L. Wilson, A. R. Tvinnereim, Bradley D. Jones, John T. Harty
Infection and Immunity Aug 2001, 69 (8) 5016-5024; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.8.5016-5024.2001

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Identification of Listeria monocytogenes In Vivo-Induced Genes by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Identification of Listeria monocytogenes In Vivo-Induced Genes by Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting
Rebecca L. Wilson, A. R. Tvinnereim, Bradley D. Jones, John T. Harty
Infection and Immunity Aug 2001, 69 (8) 5016-5024; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.69.8.5016-5024.2001
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • Notes
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Genes, Bacterial
Listeria monocytogenes

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522