Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Bacterial Infections

Differential Survival of Lyme Borreliosis Spirochetes in Ticks That Feed on Birds

Klaus Kurtenbach, Stefanie M. Schäfer, Henna-Sisko Sewell, Mick Peacey, Andrew Hoodless, Patricia A. Nuttall, Sarah E. Randolph
Klaus Kurtenbach
1Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, St. Mary's Campus, London W2 1PG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k.kurtenbach@ic.ac.uk
Stefanie M. Schäfer
1Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, St. Mary's Campus, London W2 1PG
2NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Oxford OX1 3SR
3Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henna-Sisko Sewell
1Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, St. Mary's Campus, London W2 1PG
3Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mick Peacey
2NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Oxford OX1 3SR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Hoodless
4The Game Conservancy Trust, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia A. Nuttall
2NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Oxford OX1 3SR
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah E. Randolph
3Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5893-5895.2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The abilities of the most common European genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato to survive blood meals taken by ticks feeding on birds were analyzed. A pattern of differential survival of the spirochetes in feeding ticks was observed. The result is consistent with the concept of selective transmission of Lyme borreliosis spirochetes.

The genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and, at times, their variants are maintained in nature by different sets of hosts (1, 3, 6-10, 15, 18, 20, 21, 23; K. Hanincová, S. M. Schäfer, S. Etti, H.-S. Sewell, V. Taragelová, D. Ziak, M. Labuda, and K. Kurtenbach, submitted for publication). At present, the key determinant of this host association is considered to be the interaction of B. burgdorferi sensu lato with the alternative pathway of the host's complement system (14, 16, 19, 22, 25). A recently proposed model of transmission predicts the selection of spirochetes by complement in the gut of feeding ticks (17, 18). In the present study, an avian model was used to test this prediction.

Two-week-old pheasants (Phasianus colchicus) were obtained from a breeder in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Ixodes ricinus larvae and nymphs were derived from a tick colony maintained at the NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Oxford, United Kingdom. Low-passage cultures of B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (ZS 7), Borrelia afzelii (ACA 1), Borrelia garinii (an isolate from Freiburg, Germany, with an ospA allele identical to that of the Rio2 strain [2]), and Borrelia valaisiana (strain UK) were expanded to a concentration of 107 cells per ml of culture medium. The cultures were used to infect questing nymphs with spirochetes by glass capillary feeding. Of those ticks which took up more than 100 spirochetes, as calculated by the volume of culture imbibed, 20 were introduced to each bird by being confined within a neoprene cell glued with latex to the shaved throat of each bird (Fig.1). Four groups composed of four birds each were challenged with ticks infected with one of the genospecies of B. burgdorferi sensu lato. Engorged nymphs were recovered, kept for 2 weeks, and then preserved in 70% ethanol.

For comparison, an additional four groups of 10 nymphs each (all of whom were preinfected with one of the four genospecies) were not allowed to feed on hosts but were starved for several weeks and then preserved in ethanol. Four weeks after the challenge with infected nymphs, the pheasants were tested by xenodiagnosis for Borrelia through the introduction of >50 noninfected I. ricinus larvae per animal. These larvae were also contained in neoprene cells and glued to the back of the neck of each pheasant. Engorged larvae were allowed to molt to nymphs. After xenodiagnosis, two skin biopsy samples were taken from each bird, one from the feeding site of ticks and one from the eyelid. The 5S-23S intergenic spacer and the ospA locus of B. burgdorferi sensu lato were amplified by nested PCR from DNA extracted from Borrelia cultures, ticks, and biopsy samples (5, 15), and the PCR products were sequenced. In addition, wild-type strains from three natural sources were analyzed: (i) ticks engorged on wild pheasants captured during 1996 in a woodland near Wimborne St. Giles, Dorset, United Kingdom (15), (ii) questing I. ricinus ticks collected in the summer of 2001 from the same site, and (iii) questing ticks collected in the spring of 2000 in a forest near Ville d'Eu, Normandy, France.

Of the 80 experimentally infected nymphs introduced to each group of birds, between 27 (34%) and 56 (70%) were recovered in a fully engorged state. Approximately half of the preinfected nymphs tested positive for B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. garinii, and B. valaisiana 2 weeks post-repletion (Fisher's exact test, P > 0.05) (Table 1). B. garinii and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto were also detected in xenodiagnostic ticks. Xenodiagnosis performed on birds challenged with B. valaisiana was unsuccessful because the larvae from this group of birds, all kept in one desiccator, did not survive. B. garinii was significantly more prevalent than B. burgdorferi sensu stricto in xenodiagnostic ticks (P < 0.05). By contrast, B. afzelii was not detected 2 weeks after repletion in either preinfected nymphs or xenodiagnostic ticks. However, B. afzelii as well as the other genospecies were detected in all starved nymphs that had taken up >100 spirochetes. One out of four and three out of eight biopsy samples taken from birds challenged by nymphs infected with B. garinii and B. valaisiana, respectively, tested positive, but all the birds exposed to nymphs preinfected with B. afzelii were negative. The ospA sequences of the B. garinii and B. valaisiana cultures were compared to ospA sequences detected in natural foci in the United Kingdom and France. In each pool from the field, the allele of the Rio2 strain of B. garinii (GenBank accession number AF227319 ; OspA serotype 3 [2]) and the allele of the UK strain of B. valaisiana (GenBank accession number AF09591 ) were found with considerable frequencies (Table 2).

The results show that B. garinii, B. valaisiana, and B. burgdorferi sensu lato survived the blood meal taken by ticks feeding on pheasants, whereas the B. afzelii strain was eliminated during the blood meal. The differential survival of spirochetes in the vector ticks was consistent with the xenodiagnostic data, confirming that pheasants are adequate reservoirs for B. garinii and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto (15). Although we did not assess the transmission of B. valaisiana from pheasants to ticks in this study, the survival of this genospecies in vector nymphs and its detection in three out of eight biopsy samples suggest that pheasants are also adequate reservoirs for B. valaisiana. This is strongly supported by the presence of this genospecies in ticks that fed on wild pheasants (15) (Table 2).

It is very unlikely that the elimination of the ACA 1 strain of B. afzelii in ticks feeding on birds was due to the loss of infectivity of this particular isolate, because starved ticks remained infected with this strain. Rather, the results indicate that the uptake of avian blood triggered the elimination of B. afzelii in the tick. Furthermore, B. afzelii has been detected only occasionally in bird-derived ticks anywhere in the world. The experimental and field-derived data taken together strongly suggest that all strains of B. afzelii are killed in ticks feeding on birds.

The pattern of differential survival found in this study is consistent with in vitro findings on resistance or sensitivity of spirochetes to avian complement of studies using the same cultures of B. burgdorferi sensu lato (16). The data validate our recent model of selective transmission of B. burgdorferi sensu lato, which suggests that B. afzelii is lysed by avian complement in the gut of the feeding tick (17, 18). It remains to be determined whether B. garinii and B. valaisiana are eliminated in ticks feeding on rodents, as would be predicted by the high sensitivity to complement of B. garinii strains (other than OspA serotype 4 strains or NT 29 ribotypes that are associated with rodents [8, 21]) and B. valaisiana (16).

Resistance of spirochetes to complement is now known to be mediated by the expression of complement regulator-acquiring surface proteins (11-13). In fact, a general property of the proteins encoded by genes of the erp gene family appears to be their ability to bind host-derived complement control proteins in a species-specific pattern (24). Furthermore, the erp genes are expressed in infected, feeding Ixodes scapularis ticks (4). Altogether, the combined information points to the tick gut as a crucial site of selection during the life cycle of B. burgdorferi sensu lato. Thus, we suggest that B. burgdorferi sensu lato comprises distinct ecotypes that are determined by their erp gene repertoires.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Flow chart illustrating the experimental protocol to assess reservoir competence of pheasants for B. burgdorferi sensu lato. The life stages of ticks and the points where samples were taken and preserved are indicated.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Infection chains of B. burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies with the pheasant as the avian host model, infected I. ricinus nymphs as vectors, and larvae as xenodiagnostic ticksa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Frequency of ospA alleles of B. garinii and B. valaisiana in the field

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank M. M. Simon (Freiburg, Germany) for the supply of Borrelia cultures.

The study was supported by the Natural Environment Research Council and The Wellcome Trust, London, United Kingdom.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 April 2002.
    • Returned for modification 4 June 2002.
    • Accepted 5 July 2002.
  • Copyright © 2002 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Casjens, S., N. Palmer, R. van Vugt, W. M. Huang, B. Stevenson, P. Rosa, R. Lathigra, G. Sutton, J. Peterson, R. J. Dobson, D. Haft, E. Hickey, M. Gwinn, O. White, and C. M. Fraser. 2000. A bacterial genome in flux: the twelve linear and nine circular extrachromosomal DNAs in an infectious isolate of the Lyme disease spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi. Mol. Microbiol.35:490-516.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Escudero, R., M. Barral, A. Pérez, M. M. Vitutia, A. L. García-Pérez, S. Jiménez, R. E. Sellek, and P. Anda. 2000. Molecular and pathogenic characterization of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato isolates from Spain. J. Clin. Microbiol.38:4026-4033.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Gern, L., A. Estrada-Pena, F. Frandsen, J. S. Gray, T. G. T. Jaenson, F. Jongejan, O. Kahl, E. Korenberg, R. Mehl, and P. A. Nuttall. 1998. European reservoir hosts of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Zentbl. Bakteriol.287:196-204.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    Gilmore, R. D., M. L. Mbow, and B. Stevenson. 2001. Analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi gene expression during life cycle phases of the tick vector Ixodes scapularis. Microbes Infect.3:799-808.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Guy, E. C., and G. Stanek. 1991. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in patients with Lyme disease by the polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Pathol.44:610-611.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Gylfe, Å., B. Olsen, D. Straševièius, N. M. Ras, P. Weihe, L. Noppa, Y. Östberg, G. Baranton, and S. Bergström. 1999. Isolation of Lyme disease Borrelia from puffins (Fratercula arctica) and seabird ticks (Ixodes uriae) on the Faeroe Islands. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:890-896.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.
    Gylfe, Å., S. Bergström, J. Lunstrom, and B. Olsen. 2000. Epidemiology—reactivation of Borrelia infection in birds. Nature403:724-725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Hu, C. M., B. Wilske, V. Fingerle, Y. Lobet, and L. Gern. 2001. Transmission of Borrelia garinii OspA serotype 4 to BALB/c mice by Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in the field. J. Clin. Microbiol.39:1169-1171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.
    Humair, P. F., D. Postic, R. Wallich, and L. Gern. 1998. An avian reservoir (Turdus merula) of the Lyme borreliosis spirochetes. Zentbl. Bakteriol.287:521-538.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Humair, P. F., O. Rais, and L. Gern. 1999. Transmission of Borrelia afzelii from Apodemus mice and Clethrionomys voles to Ixodes ricinus ticks, differential transmission pattern and overwintering maintenance. Parasitology118:33-42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Kraiczy, P., C. Skerka, M. Kirschfink, V. Brade, and P. F. Zipfel. 2001. Immune evasion of Borrelia burgdorferi by acquisition of human complement regulators FHL-1/reconectin and factor H. Eur. J. Immunol.31:1674-1684.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.
    Kraiczy, P., C. Skerka, M. Kirschfink, P. F. Zipfel, and V. Brade. 2001. Mechanism of complement resistance of pathogenic Borrelia burgdorferi isolates. Int. Immunopharmacol.1:393-401.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Kraiczy, P. C. Skerka, V. Brade, and P. F. Zipfel. 2001. Further characterization of complement regulator-acquiring surface proteins of Borrelia burgdorferi.Infect. Immun.69:7800-7809.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Kuo, M. M., R. S. Lane, and P. C. Giclas. 2000. A comparative study of mammalian and reptilian alternative pathway of complement-mediated killing of the Lyme disease spirochete (Borrelia burgdorferi). J. Parasitol.86:1223-1228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Kurtenbach, K., M. Peacey, S. G. T. Rijpkema, A. N. Hoodless, P. A. Nuttall, and S. E. Randolph. 1998. Differential transmission of the genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato by game birds and small rodents in England. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.64:1169-1174.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Kurtenbach, K., H.-S. Sewell, N. H. Ogden, S. E. Randolph, and P. A. Nuttall. 1998. Serum complement sensitivity as a key factor in Lyme disease ecology. Infect. Immun.66:1248-1251.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Kurtenbach, K., S. De Michelis, H.-S. Sewell, S. Etti, S. M. Schäfer, R. Hails, M. Collares-Pereira, M. Santos-Reis, K. Haninçová, M. Labuda, A. Bormane, and M. Donaghy. 2001. Distinct combinations of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies found in individual questing ticks from Europe. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.67:4926-4929.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Kurtenbach, K., S. De Michelis, S. Etti, S. M. Schäfer, H.-S. Sewell, V. Brade, and P. Kraiczy. 2002. Host association of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato—-the key role of host complement. Trends Microbiol.10:74-79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Lane, R. S., and G. B. Quistad. 1998. Borreliacidal factor in the blood of the western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis). J. Parasitol.84:29-34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Le Fleche, A., D. Postic, K. Girardet, O. Peter, and G. Baranton. 1997. Characterization of Borrelia lusitaniae sp. nov. by 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.47:921-925.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Marconi, R. T., S. Hohenberger, S. Jauris-Heipke, U. Schulte-Spechtel, C. P. Lavoie, D. Röβler, and B. Wilske. 1999. Genetic analysis of Borrelia garinii OspA serotype 4 strains associated with neuroborreliosis: evidence for extensive genetic homogeneity. J. Clin. Microbiol.37:3965-3970.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Nelson, D. R., S. Rooney, N. J. Miller, and T. N. Mather. 2000. Complement-mediated killing of Borrelia burgdorferi by non-immune sera from sika deer. J. Parasitol.86:1232-1238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Postic, D., M. Assous, P. A. D. Grimont, and G. Baranton. 1994. Diversity of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato evidenced by restriction fragment length polymorphism of rrf (5S)-rrl (23S) intergenic spacer amplicons. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.44:743-752.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    Stevenson, B., N. El-Hage, M. A. Hines, J. C. Miller, and K. Babb. 2002. Differential binding of host complement inhibitor factor H by Borrelia burgdorferi Erp surface proteins: a possible mechanism underlying the expansive host range of Lyme disease spirochetes. Infect. Immun.70:491-497.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Van Dam, A. P., A. Oei, R. Jaspars, C. Fijen, B. Wilske, L. Spanjaard, and J. Dankert. 1997. Complement-mediated serum sensitivity among spirochetes that cause Lyme disease. Infect. Immun.65:1228-1236.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Differential Survival of Lyme Borreliosis Spirochetes in Ticks That Feed on Birds
Klaus Kurtenbach, Stefanie M. Schäfer, Henna-Sisko Sewell, Mick Peacey, Andrew Hoodless, Patricia A. Nuttall, Sarah E. Randolph
Infection and Immunity Oct 2002, 70 (10) 5893-5895; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5893-5895.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Differential Survival of Lyme Borreliosis Spirochetes in Ticks That Feed on Birds
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Differential Survival of Lyme Borreliosis Spirochetes in Ticks That Feed on Birds
Klaus Kurtenbach, Stefanie M. Schäfer, Henna-Sisko Sewell, Mick Peacey, Andrew Hoodless, Patricia A. Nuttall, Sarah E. Randolph
Infection and Immunity Oct 2002, 70 (10) 5893-5895; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.10.5893-5895.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Arachnid Vectors
Birds
Borrelia burgdorferi
Lyme disease
Ticks

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522