Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Molecular Genomics

A Comparison of Murine and Human Immunoproteomes of Helicobacter pylori Validates the Preclinical Murine Infection Model for Antigen Screening

Dirk Bumann, Petra Holland, Frank Siejak, Jan Koesling, Nicolas Sabarth, Stefanie Lamer, Ursula Zimny-Arndt, Peter R. Jungblut, Thomas F. Meyer
Dirk Bumann
1Department of Molecular Biology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petra Holland
1Department of Molecular Biology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frank Siejak
2Central Core Facility Protein Analysis, Max-Planck-Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jan Koesling
1Department of Molecular Biology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicolas Sabarth
1Department of Molecular Biology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefanie Lamer
2Central Core Facility Protein Analysis, Max-Planck-Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ursula Zimny-Arndt
2Central Core Facility Protein Analysis, Max-Planck-Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter R. Jungblut
2Central Core Facility Protein Analysis, Max-Planck-Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas F. Meyer
1Department of Molecular Biology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: meyer@mpiib-berlin.mpg.de
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.11.6494-6498.2002
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Preclinical mouse infection models are widely used for Helicobacter vaccine development, but how well such models mimic important aspects of human infections is unknown. A comparison of Helicobacter pylori immunoproteomes of infected mice with previously reported patient data reveals a high agreement in the antigens recognized, suggesting that H. pylori in vivo protein composition and recognition by the host immune system are comparable in mice and humans. Murine Helicobacter models may thus be valid to screen antigens for human vaccination.

The gram-negative bacterium Helicobacter pylori is a major causative agent of chronic active gastritis as well as gastric and duodenal ulcers. Moreover, it contributes to the development of gastric adenocarcinoma and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. There has been extensive work to develop a Helicobacter vaccine. Most preclinical studies have been performed using mouse Helicobacter infection models because of the practical advantages of small-animal models (15). H. pylori does not normally colonize mice, but some mouse-adapted strains that can infect the murine stomach have been identified. Little work on in vivo gene expression of H. pylori has been done, but transcript levels of four important Helicobacter genes are similar for human biopsy samples and mouse samples (23). However, there is no detectable phase variation of Lewis antigen expression (27), and the important virulence factors CagA and VacA are lost during mouse colonization (11, 25). Pathological changes in the murine system include gastritis and in some cases follicle formation and even low-grade mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma in the gastric mucosa (5, 17), whereas ulcer formation and adenocarcinoma have not been observed. Various vaccines that induce protective immunity against a Helicobacter challenge in the mouse model have been developed, but clinical trials have revealed a poor efficacy of such vaccines in humans (21), suggesting that murine Helicobacter models might be of limited value for vaccine development. The failure to transfer mouse vaccination strategies to humans could be due to potential differences in Helicobacter protein expression, antigen exposure to the host immune system, vaccine delivery, and protective immune mechanisms (8). To address the first two issues (protein composition and antigen exposure to the immune system,) which could particularly affect the screening of protective antigens, we compared the H. pylori immunoproteome in infected mice with previous data from infected human patients. Helicobacter antigens that induce specific antibody responses are obviously expressed in situ (4, 9, 26) and become exposed to the host immune system.

Female, 6- to 8-week-old, C57BL/6 mice were infected by three sequential oral inoculations of 5 × 109H. pylori SS1 (16) cells as described previously (6). Mice were killed at 14 weeks postinfection, and H. pylori colonization was assessed by plating of stomach samples. Sera were obtained prior to infection and by terminal bleeding. Alternatively, mice were subcutaneously immunized with 550 μg of H. pylori P76 sonicate mixed with incomplete Freud's adjuvant and given two booster doses on days 14 and 28.

H. pylori SS1 proteins were resolved in two dimensions on small gels (7.0 by 8.5 cm) and blotted as described previously (12). The blots were incubated with mouse sera at a dilution of 1:200 and stained using a peroxidase-coupled polyvalent goat antibody to mouse immunoglobulins (Sigma) at a dilution of 1:10,000 and enhanced chemiluminescence detection (ECL kit; Amersham). To increase the detection range, films were exposed for 5 to 30 min. The 35 spots with the highest postinfection seroreactivity but low to nondetectable preinfection seroreactivity (specifically recognized) and the 14 spots with the highest preinfection seroreactivity (cross-reactive) were analyzed by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-mass spectrometry peptide mass fingerprinting using a minimum sequence coverage of 30% (12). Coomassie brilliant blue spot staining intensities were quantified using the gel analysis program TOPSPOT.

Among the several hundred detectable protein species of H. pylori strain SS1 (12), only a few were recognized by preinfection sera (Fig. 1A). Sera from the same individual mice obtained at 14 weeks postinfection reacted with a much larger number of proteins, and the overall staining intensity was higher (Fig. 1B), which agrees with previously published human data (7, 14, 19, 20). Despite the facts that all mice were from a genetically homogenous inbred background and all were infected with the same cultures of a single H. pylori strain, there were marked differences between the recognition patterns of the individual sera. Immunostaining intensities of each of the 587 recognized protein species were determined in mice using a semiquantitative scale and average values from eight infected mice. Of the 35 species that were most strongly recognized by sera from infected mice but not by preinfection sera (specific recognition), 31 species corresponding to 21 different proteins could be identified (Table 1). In addition to these specifically recognized proteins, 14 protein species that were already strongly recognized prior to infection (cross-reactive) were analyzed, resulting in the identification of 13 protein species that corresponded to 10 proteins (Table 1).

Among the total of 31 highly immunogenic proteins (21 specifically recognized and 10 cross-reactive) in the mouse model, 18 (58%) have been previously described as H. pylori antigens recognized by sera of infected patients, and similar levels of overlap are also observed for the specific and cross-reactive subsets, respectively (Table 1) (7, 14, 19, 20). Some differences between murine and human data sets are likely due to the different H. pylori strains. However, the level of agreement between the mouse data and the combined human data sets is still high compared to the rather large variation observed in the various human studies (only 34% of the seroreactive species were detected in more than one study). The majority of immunogenic Helicobacter antigens thus appears to be expressed both in infected murine and human stomachs and to be exposed to both immune systems (4, 9, 26).

Abundant Helicobacter proteins are overrepresented among the seroreactive antigens (Fig. 2), suggesting that dose-dependent responses may influence the recognition pattern. An alternative explanation is that spots containing rather small amounts of antigen might bind to a small amount of antibody and thus escape detection. However, on the basis of the least abundant species that was strongly recognized on the immunoblots (spot 59, a protein species yet to be identified), it can be estimated that this technical limitation probably affects only a minority of rare species (Fig. 2).

The 32 identified secreted and/or surface-associated proteins (2, 24) represent only 2% of the total Helicobacter proteome but 13 (18%) of the 71 seroreactive antigens (Table 1), suggesting that antigen localization may influence antigenicity. Secreted proteins and surface-exposed proteins that are sequestered by vesicle budding (13) penetrate the mucosa (18) and may thus more easily gain access to inductive sites. Interestingly, a predominance of surface-associated proteins among seroreactive antigens has recently also been demonstrated for Staphylococcus aureus (4).

It was thought that immunoblotting would be a good way to select promising vaccine antigen candidates (10, 14, 19, 20), although cellular instead of humoral immune responses seem to be relevant for protection against H. pylori at least in the mouse model (1, 3, 22). Interestingly, the combined data from infected mice (this study) and differentially immunized mice (this study) (10) show that all known protective antigens can be recognized by antibodies (Table 2), supporting a correlation between seroreactivity and cellular immune responses which could be related to the fact that optimal antibody responses depend on help from T cells. Interestingly, many protective H. pylori antigens, including the well-characterized urease, are cross-reactive in noninfected mice and patients, suggesting that specificity is not a prerequisite for protective efficacy. A comparison between the recognition patterns of infected (nonprotected) versus lysate-immunized (protected) mice might yield interesting information about individual, potentially protective antigens, but our preliminary data indicate a large number of differentially recognized antigens, suggesting that relevant candidates might be difficult to identify (not shown).

In conclusion, the pattern of H. pylori proteins that are expressed in infected mice and become exposed to the mouse immune system appear to be similar to those in human Helicobacter infections, suggesting that the mouse infection model might be suitable for preclinical screening of antigen candidates.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Typical immunoproteome of H. pylori strain SS1 as revealed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting with sera from the same mouse obtained either prior to infection (A) or 14 weeks after infection (B). The immunoblots were stained with a peroxidase-coupled antibody to mouse immunoglobulins followed by chemiluminescence detection. To enhance the detection of weakly cross-reactive antigens, film A was exposed for a longer time period (15 min) than film B (5 min). Abbreviations: SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; IEF, isoelectric focusing.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Staining intensities of specifically recognized and cross-reactive (cross-r.) H. pylori antigens (top). The vertical lines represent the median values. For comparison, a histogram for the staining intensities of all detectable protein spots is shown at the bottom of the figure. Strongly immunogenic spots have higher staining intensities than those of all detectable spots (P < 0.001, t test), and cross-reactive species are significantly more intensely stained than specifically recognized species (P < 0.01, t test). a.u., arbitrary units.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

H. pylori antigens recognized by murine and human sera

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Seroreactivity of protective Helicobacter antigens in mice and humans

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 12 February 2002.
    • Returned for modification 8 April 2002.
    • Accepted 22 July 2002.
  • Copyright © 2002 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Blanchard, T. G., S. J. Czinn, R. W. Redline, N. Sigmund, G. Harriman, and J. G. Nedrud. 1999. Antibody-independent protective mucosal immunity to gastric Helicobacter infection in mice. Cell. Immunol.191:74-80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Bumann, D., S. Aksu, M. Wendland, K. Janek, U. Zimny-Arndt, N. Sabarth, T. F. Meyer, and P. R. Jungblut. 2002. Proteome analysis of secreted proteins of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Infect. Immun.70:3396-3403.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Ermak, T. H., P. J. Giannasca, R. Nichols, G. A. Myers, J. Nedrud, R. Weltzin, C. K. Lee, H. Kleanthous, and T. P. Monath. 1998. Immunization of mice with urease vaccine affords protection against Helicobacter pylori infection in the absence of antibodies and is mediated by MHC class II-restricted responses. J. Exp. Med.188:2277-2288.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Etz, H., D. B. Minh, T. Henics, A. Dryla, B. Winkler, C. Triska, A. P. Boyd, J. Sollner, W. Schmidt, U. von Ahsen, M. Buschle, S. R. Gill, J. Kolonay, H. Khalak, C. M. Fraser, A. von Gabain, E. Nagy, and A. Meinke. 2002. Identification of in vivo expressed vaccine candidate antigens from Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99:6573-6578.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Ferrero, R. L., J. M. Thiberge, M. Huerre, and A. Labigne. 1998. Immune responses of specific-pathogen-free mice to chronic Helicobacter pylori (strain SS1) infection. Infect. Immun.66:1349-1355.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Gomez-Duarte, O. G., B. Lucas, Z. X. Yan, K. Panthel, R. Haas, and T. F. Meyer. 1998. Protection of mice against gastric colonization by Helicobacter pylori by single oral dose immunization with attenuated Salmonella typhimurium producing urease subunits A and B. Vaccine16:460-471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Haas, G., G. Karaali, K. Ebermayer, W. G. Metzger, S. Lamer, U. Zimny-Arndt, S. Diescher, U. B. Goebel, K. Vogt, A. B. Roznowski, B. J. Wiedenmann, T. F. Meyer, T. Aebischer, and P. Jungblut. 2002. Immunoproteomics of Helicobacter pylori infection and relation to gastric disease. Proteomics2:313-324.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Hackett, C. J. 2000. Focus on the immunological basis of effective vaccines. Immunologist5:171-174.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Handfield, M., L. J. Brady, A. Progulske-Fox, and J. D. Hillman. 2000. IVIAT: a novel method to identify microbial genes expressed specifically during human infections. Trends Microbiol.8:336-339.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Hocking, D., E. Webb, F. Radcliff, L. Rothel, S. Taylor, G. Pinczower, C. Kapouleas, H. Braley, A. Lee, and C. Doidge. 1999. Isolation of recombinant protective Helicobacter pylori antigens. Infect. Immun.67:4713-4719.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Janvier, B., B. Grignon, C. Audibert, L. Pezennec, and J. L. Fauchere. 1999. Phenotypic changes of Helicobacter pylori components during an experimental infection in mice. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.24:27-33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Jungblut, P. R., D. Bumann, G. Haas, U. Zimny-Arndt, P. Holland, S. Lamer, F. Siejak, A. Aebischer, and T. F. Meyer. 2000. Comparative proteome analysis of Helicobacter pylori. Mol. Microbiol.36:710-725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Keenan, J., T. Day, S. Neal, B. Cook, G. Perez-Perez, R. Allardyce, and P. Bagshaw. 2000. A role for the bacterial outer membrane in the pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.182:259-264.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Kimmel, B., A. Bosserhoff, R. Frank, R. Gross, W. Goebel, and D. Beier. 2000. Identification of immunodominant antigens from Helicobacter pylori and evaluation of their reactivities with sera from patients with different gastroduodenal pathologies. Infect. Immun.68:915-920.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Lee, A. 2000. Animal models of gastroduodenal ulcer disease. Bailliere's Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol.14:75-96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Lee, A., J. O'Rourke, M. C. De Ungria, B. Robertson, G. Daskalopoulos, and M. F. Dixon. 1997. A standardized mouse model of Helicobacter pylori infection: introducing the Sydney strain. Gastroenterology112:1386-1397.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Lee, A., J. O'Rourke, and A. Enno. 2000. Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: implications of animal models on pathogenic and therapeutic considerations-mouse models of gastric lymphoma. Recent Results Cancer Res.156:42-51.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  18. 18.↵
    Mai, U. E., G. I. Perez-Perez, J. B. Allen, S. M. Wahl, M. J. Blaser, and P. D. Smith. 1992. Surface proteins from Helicobacter pylori exhibit chemotactic activity for human leukocytes and are present in gastric mucosa. J. Exp. Med.175:517-525.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    McAtee, C. P., K. E. Fry, and D. E. Berg. 1998. Identification of potential diagnostic and vaccine candidates of Helicobacter pylori by “proteome” technologies. Helicobacter3:163-169.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    McAtee, C. P., M. Y. Lim, K. Fung, M. Velligan, K. Fry, T. Chow, and D. E. Berg. 1998. Identification of potential diagnostic and vaccine candidates of Helicobacter pylori by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, sequence analysis, and serum profiling. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.5:537-542.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Michetti, P., C. Kreiss, K. L. Kotloff, N. Porta, J. L. Blanco, D. Bachmann, M. Herranz, P. F. Saldinger, I. Corthesy-Theulaz, G. Losonsky, R. Nichols, J. Simon, M. Stolte, S. Ackerman, T. P. Monath, and A. L. Blum. 1999. Oral immunization with urease and Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxin is safe and immunogenic in Helicobacter pylori-infected adults. Gastroenterology116:804-812.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Pappo, J., D. Torrey, L. Castriotta, A. Savinainen, Z. Kabok, and A. Ibraghimov. 1999. Helicobacter pylori infection in immunized mice lacking major histocompatibility complex class I and class II functions. Infect. Immun.67:337-341.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Rokbi, B., D. Seguin, B. Guy, V. Mazarin, E. Vidor, F. Mion, M. Cadoz, and M. J. Quentin-Millet. 2001. Assessment of Helicobacter pylori gene expression within mouse and human gastric mucosae by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR. Infect. Immun.69:4759-4766.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Sabarth, N., S. Lamer, U. Zimny-Arndt, P. R. Jungblut, T. F. Meyer, and D. Bumann. 2002. Identification of surface-exposed proteins of Helicobacter pylori by selective biotinylation, affinity purification, and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. J. Biol. Chem.277:27896-27902.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Sozzi, M., M. Crosatti, S. K. Kim, J. Romero, and M. J. Blaser. 2001. Heterogeneity of Helicobacter pylori cag genotypes in experimentally infected mice. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.203:109-114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Vytvytska, O., E. Nagy, M. Bluggel, H. E. Meyer, R. Kurzbauer, L. A. Huber, and C. S. Klade. 2002. Identification of vaccine candidate antigens of Staphylococcus aureus by serological proteome analysis. Proteomics2:580-590.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Wirth, H. P., M. Yang, R. M. Peek, Jr., J. Hook-Nikanne, M. Fried, and M. J. Blaser. 1999. Phenotypic diversity in Lewis expression of Helicobacter pylori isolates from the same host. J. Lab. Clin. Med.133:488-500.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
A Comparison of Murine and Human Immunoproteomes of Helicobacter pylori Validates the Preclinical Murine Infection Model for Antigen Screening
Dirk Bumann, Petra Holland, Frank Siejak, Jan Koesling, Nicolas Sabarth, Stefanie Lamer, Ursula Zimny-Arndt, Peter R. Jungblut, Thomas F. Meyer
Infection and Immunity Nov 2002, 70 (11) 6494-6498; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.11.6494-6498.2002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Comparison of Murine and Human Immunoproteomes of Helicobacter pylori Validates the Preclinical Murine Infection Model for Antigen Screening
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Comparison of Murine and Human Immunoproteomes of Helicobacter pylori Validates the Preclinical Murine Infection Model for Antigen Screening
Dirk Bumann, Petra Holland, Frank Siejak, Jan Koesling, Nicolas Sabarth, Stefanie Lamer, Ursula Zimny-Arndt, Peter R. Jungblut, Thomas F. Meyer
Infection and Immunity Nov 2002, 70 (11) 6494-6498; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.11.6494-6498.2002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antigens, Bacterial
Helicobacter pylori
proteome

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522