Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Fungal and Parasitic Infections

Major Histocompatibility Complex-Dependent Susceptibility to Cryptococcus neoformans in Mice

Erin E. McClelland, Donald L. Granger, Wayne K. Potts
Erin E. McClelland
1Biology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Erin.McClelland@m.cc.utah.edu
Donald L. Granger
2Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wayne K. Potts
1Biology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4815-4817.2003
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

To evaluate the role of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes in the resistance to Cryptococcus neoformans, we conducted infection experiments in MHC-congenic strains of mice. Significant MHC-dependent susceptibility differences were found among homozygotes and heterozygotes. This study is the first experimental demonstration of MHC-dependent susceptibility to C. neoformans infections in mice and indicates that MHC genes can be important in host resistance.

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes are unique in their general importance for conferring susceptibility or resistance to infectious and autoimmune diseases (5). It is unclear what keeps these demonstrably harmful genes from being eliminated by natural selection unless they provide some advantage, presumably against some other disease. The only way to unravel these interactions is to characterize the effects of MHC genes on a variety of pathogens and autoimmune diseases. The goal of this study was to experimentally test for an MHC-dependent susceptibility pattern during chronic Cryptococcus neoformans infections.

C. neoformans is a common, opportunistic pathogen that causes disease in immunocompromised individuals. Previous studies have found that various components of immunity are important in clearing a C. neoformans infection. These components include interleukin-12 (11), interleukin-18 (17), inducible nitric oxide synthase (2), gamma interferon (16), B cells (3), and T cells (7). Previous attempts to determine if MHC genes influence C. neoformans infections in mice (22) and humans (20) have had conflicting results.

MHC-congenic mice (C57BL/10SnJ-H-2b, B10.D2-H-2d, B10.M-H-2f, B10.BR-H-2k, B10.Q-H-2q) and BALB/c mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratories and bred thereafter under specific-pathogen-free conditions. The inclusion of BALB/c mice allowed a comparison between strains that have identical MHC genes but differ for other genes that may affect resistance to C. neoformans. All animals used for the infection experiments were either F2 segregants or first-generation progeny of F2 segregants. MHC F2 segregants were created by intercrossing the F1 heterozygotes (b/q, d/q, d/k, f/k) in order to randomize any genetic mutations that might have become differentially fixed in the backgrounds of these strains of mice. The differential accumulation of mutations in congenic strains separated by a substantial period of time (for example, over 30 years for these MHC B10 congenics) is a serious problem that can lead to erroneous conclusions (reference 8 and references therein). Generating F2 segregants randomizes any background mutations and therefore solves this problem in a much simpler way than rederiving the lines (8, 13, 25). Mice were MHC genotyped by PCR by means of two different microsatellite loci within the MHC region (a tetranucleotide repeat [23] and d17Mit34 [6]). These reactions were analyzed with denaturing gel electrophoresis, and the genotypes were scored by band size. All animal use complied with federal regulations and the guidelines of the University of Utah's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Infection experiments were conducted five times, with five of the seven genotypes being tested three or more times. (BALB/c and d/k mice were tested twice.) Mice were infected via intraperitoneal injection with 2 × 107 CFU of the wild-type H99 strain of C. neoformans (21) per ml. An error caused inocula for experiments 3 and 4 to be 4 × 108 and 3 × 106 CFU/ml, respectively. These dosage differences did not result in any significant load differences for female mice and were not correlated with final loads in males. Initially, the spleen, liver, and brain were collected to determine which organ had the most consistent loads of C. neoformans. Brain loads varied widely during this chronic infection, while spleen and liver loads were highly correlated. The liver was chosen as the optimal organ for collection because it is a site of primary infection with an intraperitoneal injection and because it had consistent loads. Thus, the liver was the only organ collected in subsequent infection experiments. Although our results could be considered liver specific, MHC-dependent clearance generally operates in the same way in different tissues, as, for example, with numbers of Salmonella organisms cleared from the spleen and liver (14).

Mice were sacrificed 39 days postinfection. This end date was chosen because the chronic infection needed to proceed long enough for the MHC genes to have an effect but not long enough to risk death of the mice. At the time of sacrifice, there were no obvious signs of clinical disease, as measured by significant weight loss and neurological symptoms, though some of the mice had ruffled fur and many had lost 5% of their body weight. C. neoformans loads were determined from platings of homogenized livers. Briefly, the livers were collected under antiseptic conditions and then homogenized in 10 ml of phosphate-buffered saline. Ten microliters of the homogenate was diluted in 90 μl of phosphate-buffered saline in serial dilutions to 10−5. For each dilution, 10 μl was plated on yeast extract-peptone-glucose agar containing 10,000 U of penicillin/ml, 1 mg of gentamicin/ml, and 0.1 mg of chloramphenicol/ml. Plates were incubated at 35°C for 36 h, after which time C. neoformans colonies from two dilutions were counted and averaged.

The loads from female mice across the five infection experiments were similar, so the data were pooled. Figure 1 depicts the C. neoformans loads for five different strains of mice. The MHC-congenic strains with haplotypes b/b, d/d, and q/q and BALB/c mice were relatively resistant, while k/k mice were relatively susceptible (P < 0.028). Though male mice were also infected, the loads were significantly different between experiments (analysis of variance, P = 0.001) and relative susceptibilities between genotypes were sometimes reversed, making interpretation difficult (data not shown).

To evaluate resistance patterns in heterozygotes, four MHC heterozygotes (b/d, b/q, d/k, and d/q) were also infected. Unfortunately, three heterozygote combinations (b/d, b/q, and d/q) were uninformative with respect to dominant or recessive patterns because the loads among the b/b, d/d, and q/q homozygotes were not significantly different (Fig. 1). In the case where the loads of the d/d and k/k homozygotes were significantly different (Fig. 1), the d/k heterozygote inherited resistance in a dominant fashion (Fig. 2a). In addition, the d/q heterozygote displayed a pattern of underdominance where the heterozygote did worse than either homozygote (heterozygote disadvantage) (Fig. 2b).

C. neoformans loads in female MHC-congenic mice showed that the k/k genotype was 4- to 10-fold more susceptible than three other MHC genotypes and the BALB/c strain (H-2d) (P < 0.028). Previous studies have disagreed on the role of MHC in C. neoformans infections. Two studies which assayed humoral responses in mice (12) and disease correlations with the HLA phenotype in humans (24) suggested that the MHC genotype influenced the response to a C. neoformans infection. However, two studies that assayed T-cell proliferation (20) and survival in mice (22) suggested that these measures of the immune response were not influenced by the MHC genotype. The study that assayed T-cell proliferation (20) was not very comparable to our study because a different strain of C. neoformans (an acapsular mutant) was used in an in vitro assay with human T lymphocytes.

The study by Rhodes et al. (22) is the one most comparable to our study because MHC differences in B10-congenic strains were examined. However, their failure to find an MHC effect is inconsistent with both our data and the MHC-dependent humoral responses found by Dromer et al. (12). Possible explanations for this inconsistency include the following factors: (i) survival was assayed rather than pathogen loads, (ii) a different strain of C. neoformans was used, and (iii) B10 k/k mice were not infected, and B10k/k is the only MHC genotype that showed significant susceptibility according to our data. However, two recombinant strains [B10.A and B10.A (2R)] which express k alleles at the class I K locus and both class II loci were infected. These two strains showed no significant pattern of susceptibility. These data combined with our own suggest that the Dk allele may confer susceptibility to C. neoformans infection. This involvement of a class I gene is consistent with evidence that Th1 and cellular immunity are important in clearing C. neoformans infections (1).

Our results might seem inconsistent with the results of Dromer et al. (12), where the k haplotype was a high antibody responder. However, high antibody titers are difficult to interpret because they can have opposite implications with regard to immunocompetence: they may indicate either high responsiveness or trouble clearing the infection. A Th2 response to a C. neoformans infection often results in high antibody titers and a lack of clearance, leading to a chronic infection (18).

How resistance is inherited (dominant or recessive) appears to be haplotype dependent (Fig. 2). These different allele-specific dominant or recessive patterns are not unique as similar findings have been seen for both Streptococcus pyogenes (9) and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (19). The molecular basis of these differences is presumably due to the influence of the MHC genotype on which T-cell epitope becomes immunodominant. The relatively rare pattern of underdominance seen in the d/q heterozygotes might arise if the important immunodominant T cells of the homozygotes are deleted during thymic education of the heterozygote. T cells used by one MHC allele can be deleted during negative selection in the thymus when another MHC allele is present (15). Alternatively, the addition of new MHC specificities can alter which T-cell epitope becomes immunodominant (26).

MHC molecules are important in disease resistance for many infectious agents, including other fungal pathogens such as Candida albicans (4, 10). This study is the first demonstration that MHC can have a role in the clearance of C. neoformans infections and suggests that MHC-mediated immune recognition can be an important variable in susceptibility to C. neoformans infections. However, it must be noted that, as is the case with all studies using MHC-congenic strains, an observed effect may be due to other genes linked to the MHC.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Female MHC-dependent susceptibility to C. neoformans in F2 segregants. Counts are mean numbers of CFU per whole liver ± standard errors. ⋄, median values. Sample sizes are indicated above each bar. All P values are from a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results from all other comparisons were insignificant.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Resistance to C. neoformans in F2 segregants is inherited in both a dominant (a) and an underdominant (b) fashion. Counts are mean numbers of CFU per whole liver ± standard errors. ⋄, median values. Sample sizes are indicated above each bar. All P values are from a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results from all other comparisons were insignificant.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Linda Morrison, Kyle Gardner, and Maureen Wilkinson for technical help and mouse husbandry.

This work was supported by an NIH grant to W.K.P. (GM39578) and partially by a Technology Innovation grant to D.L.G. from the University of Utah.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 10 March 2003.
    • Returned for modification 21 April 2003.
    • Accepted 3 May 2003.
  • Copyright © 2003 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Abrahams, I. 1966. Further studies on acquired resistance to murine cryptococcosis: enhancing effect of Bordetella pertussis. J. Immunol.96:525-529.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Aguirre, K. M., and G. W. Gibson. 2000. Differing requirement for inducible nitric oxide synthase activity in clearance of primary and secondary Cryptococcus neoformans infection. Med. Mycol.38:343-353.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Aguirre, K. M., and L. L. Johnson. 1997. A role for B cells in resistance to Cryptococcus neoformans in mice. Infect. Immun.65:525-530.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Ashman, R. B. 1987. Mouse candidiasis. II. Host responses are T-cell dependent and regulated by genes in the major histocompatibility complex. Immunogenetics25:200-203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Baum, H., and N. A. Staines. 1997. MHC-derived peptides and the CD4+ T-cell repertoire: implications for autoimmune disease. Cytokines Cell. Mol. Ther.3:115-125.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Blake, J. A., J. E. Richardson, C. J. Bult, J. A. Kadin, and J. T. Eppig. 2002. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): the model organism database for the laboratory mouse. Nucleic Acids Res.30:113-115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Buchanan, K. L., and H. A. Doyle. 2000. Requirement for CD4+ T lymphocytes in host resistance against Cryptococcus neoformans in the central nervous system of immunized mice. Infect. Immun.68:456-462.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Carroll, L. S., and W. K. Potts. 2001. Accumulated background variation among H2 mutant congenic strains: elimination through PCR-based genotyping of F2 segregants. J. Immunol. Methods257:137-143.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Chen, C. Y., S. A. Cohen, M. B. Zaleski, and B. Albini. 1992. Genetic control of streptococcus-induced hepatic granulomatous lesions in mice. Immunogenetics36:28-32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Costantino, P. J., N. F. Gare, and J. R. Warmington. 1995. Humoral immune responses to systemic Candida albicans infection in inbred mouse strains. Immunol. Cell Biol.73:125-133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Decken, K., G. Köhler, K. Palmer-Lehmann, A. Wunderlin, F. Mattner, J. Magram, M. K. Gately, and G. Alber. 1998. Interleukin-12 is essential for a protective Th1 response in mice infected with Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun.66:4994-5000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Dromer, F., P. Yeni, and J. Charreire. 1988. Genetic control of the humoral response to cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide in mice. Immunogenetics28:417-424.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Gerlai, R. 1996. Gene-targeting studies of mammalian behavior: is it the mutation or the background genotype? Trends Neurosci.19:177-181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Hormaeche, C. E., K. A. Harrington, and H. S. Joysey. 1985. Natural resistance to salmonellae in mice: control by genes within the major histocompatibility complex. J. Infect. Dis.152:1050-1056.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Kappler, J. W., N. Roehm, and P. Marrack. 1987. T cell tolerance by clonal elimination in the thymus. Cell49:273-280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Kawakami, K., Y. Kinjo, S. Yara, Y. Koguchi, K. Uezu, T. Nakayama, M. Taniguchi, and A. Saito. 2001. Activation of Vα14+ natural killer T cells by α-galactosylceramide results in development of Th1 response and local host resistance in mice infected with Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun.69:213-220.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Kawakami, K., Y. Koguchi, M. H. Qureshi, Y. Kinjo, S. Yara, A. Miyazato, M. Kurimoto, K. Takeda, S. Akira, and A. Saito. 2000. Reduced host resistance and Th1 response to Cryptococcus neoformans in interleukin-18 deficient mice. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.186:121-126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Lovchik, J. A., J. A. Wilder, G. B. Huffnagle, R. Riblet, C. R. Lyons, and M. F. Lipscomb. 1999. Ig heavy chain complex-linked genes influence the immune response in a murine cryptococcal infection. J. Immunol.163:3907-3913.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    McClelland, E. E., D. J. Penn, and W. K. Potts. 2003. Major histocompatibility complex heterozygote superiority during coinfection. Infect. Immun.71:2079-2086.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Mody, C. H., C. J. L. Wood, R. M. Syme, and J. C. Spurrell. 1999. The cell wall and membrane of Cryptococcus neoformans possess a mitogen for human T lymphocytes. Infect. Immun.67:936-941.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Perfect, J. R., S. D. Lang, and D. T. Durack. 1980. Chronic cryptococcal meningitis: a new experimental model in rabbits. Am. J. Pathol.101:177-194.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Rhodes, J. C., L. S. Wicker, and W. J. Urba. 1980. Genetic control of susceptibility to Cryptococcus neoformans in mice. Infect. Immun.29:494-499.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Saha, B. K., and S. E. Cullen. 1986. Molecular mapping of murine I region recombinants: crossing over in the E beta gene. J. Immunol.136:1112-1119.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  24. 24.↵
    Van Dam, M. G., R. A. Seaton, and A. J. Hamilton. 1998. Analysis of HLA association in susceptibility to infection with Cryptococcus neoformans var. gattii in a Papua New Guinean population. Med. Mycol.36:185-188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Wolfer, D. P., and H. P. Lipp. 2000. Dissecting the behaviour of transgenic mice: is it the mutation, the genetic background, or the environment? Exp. Physiol.85:627-634.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Yewdell, J. W., and J. R. Bennink. 1999. Immunodominance in major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted T lymphocyte responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol.17:51-88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Major Histocompatibility Complex-Dependent Susceptibility to Cryptococcus neoformans in Mice
Erin E. McClelland, Donald L. Granger, Wayne K. Potts
Infection and Immunity Jul 2003, 71 (8) 4815-4817; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4815-4817.2003

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Major Histocompatibility Complex-Dependent Susceptibility to Cryptococcus neoformans in Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Major Histocompatibility Complex-Dependent Susceptibility to Cryptococcus neoformans in Mice
Erin E. McClelland, Donald L. Granger, Wayne K. Potts
Infection and Immunity Jul 2003, 71 (8) 4815-4817; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4815-4817.2003
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

cryptococcosis
Cryptococcus neoformans
major histocompatibility complex

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522