Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Immunity and Vaccines

Vaccination with the Chlamydia trachomatis Major Outer Membrane Protein Can Elicit an Immune Response as Protective as That Resulting from Inoculation with Live Bacteria

Sukumar Pal, Ellena M. Peterson, Luis M. de la Maza
Sukumar Pal
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Sciences I, Room D440, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4800
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ellena M. Peterson
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Sciences I, Room D440, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4800
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luis M. de la Maza
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Sciences I, Room D440, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4800
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lmdelama@uci.edu
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.12.8153-8160.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

BALB/c mice were vaccinated by the intramuscular (i.m.) and subcutaneous (s.c.) routes with a native preparation of the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis (MoPn) major outer membrane protein (MOMP), using Montanide ISA 720 and CpG-1826 as adjuvants. A negative control group was immunized with ovalbumin and the two adjuvants, and a positive control group was immunized intranasally (i.n.) with 104 inclusion-forming units (IFU) of C. trachomatis. Four weeks after the last i.m.-plus-s.c. immunization, mice were challenged in the ovarian bursa with 105 IFU of C. trachomatis MoPn. Six weeks after the genital challenge, animals were mated, and the pregnancies were monitored. After vaccination with MOMP, the mice developed strong Chlamydia-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. Following the genital challenge, of the mice vaccinated with the MOMP, only 15% (3/20) had positive vaginal cultures, while 85% (17/20) of the animals immunized with ovalbumin had positive cultures over the 6 weeks of observation (P < 0.05). Also, only 14% (3/21) of the animals inoculated i.n. with Chlamydia had positive vaginal cultures. After mating, 75% (15/20) of the mice vaccinated with MOMP carried embryos in both uterine horns. Of the animals vaccinated i.n. with the Chlamydia, 81% (17/21) had embryos in both uterine horns (P > 0.05). In contrast, only 10% (2/20) of the mice immunized with ovalbumin had embryos in both uterine horns (P < 0.05). In conclusion, immunization with a purified preparation of the MOMP is as effective as vaccination with viable C. trachomatis in eliciting a protective immune response against a genital challenge in mice.

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most prevalent sexually transmitted bacterial pathogen in the world, with an estimated 100 million clinically diagnosed cases occurring annually (22, 24, 41, 42, 44). In addition, a similar or greater number of asymptomatic cases go undetected (22, 41, 44). The most common clinical presentations are urethritis and cervicitis (41, 42, 44). In general, these acute manifestations resolve over a period of a few weeks. However, in certain patients, long-term sequelae may develop, including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility (55). Furthermore, in areas of the world with poor hygienic conditions, C. trachomatis causes trachoma and lymphogranuloma venereum (41, 42). Although effective antibiotic therapy is available, eradication of these organisms will most likely only be achieved through a vaccination program (10, 14, 15, 18, 47).

Decades ago, in an attempt to prevent trachoma, vaccine trials with viable or inactivated whole organisms were performed. Several conclusions resulted from those trials. The protection was of short duration and was serovar specific and, in some of the vaccinated individuals that were reexposed to Chlamydia, a severe disease developed (15, 42). This hypersensitivity reaction was thought to be due to a component present in the organism (26). Furthermore, the fact that the protection was serovar specific led to the conclusion that the antigenic component involved in eliciting the immune response was unique to each serovar. Based on these observations, recent efforts have focused on developing a subunit vaccine using the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) of C. trachomatis as the antigen (10, 18). The MOMP constitutes 60% of the mass of the outer membrane and is surface exposed, and numerous T- and B-cell epitopes have been mapped in this protein (2, 46). A proposed model of the secondary structure of the C. trachomatis mouse pneumonitis (MoPn) MOMP identified 16 transmembrane segments with large loops corresponding to the variable domains of this protein (40, 45).

The C. trachomatis MoPn serovar was originally recovered from mice inoculated with human respiratory tract specimens (30). This organism has extensively been used to characterize the pathogenesis of genital and respiratory infections in mouse models (27, 39). Inoculation of the genital tract of female mice with MoPn results in an infection that parallels that described in humans, including vaginal shedding for several weeks and development of infertility (9). The C. trachomatis MoPn model has also been utilized to test several vaccination strategies. For example, Pal et al. (33) showed that intranasal immunization of mice with viable C. trachomatis MoPn organisms elicited an immune response that protected against a subsequent genital challenge. The immunized and challenged mice had a significant decrease in the severity and length of vaginal shedding. Furthermore, the immunized animals were protected against infertility. Immunization of mice with C. trachomatis MoPn subunit vaccines has also provided some encouraging results. For instance, immunization with the outer membrane has been shown to induce significant protection (3, 34). A preparation of the MOMP, extracted directly from Chlamydia and formulated with Freund's adjuvant, was also shown to elicit partial protection (35). Unfortunately, Freund's adjuvant cannot be used in humans. In an attempt to test a subunit vaccine that could potentially be utilized in humans, we formulated the native MOMP using CpG and Montanide, two adjuvants that are now in clinical trials (8, 12, 17, 54). Here we show that, with this approach, we were able to achieve an immune response as protective as that induced by live organisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

C. trachomatis stocks.The C. trachomatis MoPn strain Nigg II was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA) and was grown in HeLa-229 cells using Eagle's minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (33). Purified elementary bodies (EB) were stored at −70°C in 0.2 M sucrose, 20 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.4), and 5 mM glutamic acid (6). The stocks were titrated in HeLa-229 cells.

Purification of the C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP.The extraction and purification of the C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP were performed as previously described (35). In brief, C. trachomatis MoPn grown in tissue culture was washed, resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4), and treated with 25 μg/ml of DNase for 2 h at 4°C. The preparation was centrifuged and the pellet was extracted twice with 2% of 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethylammonio]-l-propanesulfonate (CHAPS; Anatrace, Maumee, OH) in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) containing 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), 1 mM EDTA, and 100 mM dithiothreitol (DTT; Roche Diagnostic Corporation, Indianapolis, IN). The pellet was again extracted with 2% Anzergent 3-14 (n-tetradecyl-N,N-dimethyl-3-ammonio-1-propanesulfonate) (Z3-14; Anatrace) in phosphate buffer (see above) at 37°C. To further purify the MOMP, the supernatant was applied to a 30- by 2-cm hydroxyapatite (Bio-Gel HTP gel; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) column equilibrated with 0.1% Z3-14 in 0.02 M phosphate buffer (pH 5.5) and eluted with a linear gradient from 0.02 to 0.5 M in the same buffer (6). The fractions showing an increase in the absorbance at 280 nm were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and identified by Western blotting using the monoclonal antibody MoPn 40 to the C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP developed in our laboratory. Fractions containing a single band were pooled, and the MOMP was then electrophoresed and stained with silver nitrate according to the procedure described by the manufacturer (Bio-Rad Laboratories). To further assess the purity of the MOMP an N-terminal amino acid analysis was performed by the core facilities at the University of California, Irvine.

The purified C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP was refolded by dialysis in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.8) containing 2 mM reduced glutathione, 1 mM oxidized glutathione (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 1 mM EDTA, and 0.05% Z3-14. The protein was then concentrated and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde (Sigma) at room temperature for 2 min. Glycine (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was then added to stop the reaction. The MOMP was concentrated using a Centricon-10 filter (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) and dialyzed before immunization against 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.15 M NaCl and 0.05% Z3-14.

Immunization and challenge of mice.Three- to 4-week-old female BALB/c (H-2d) mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA) and were housed at the University of California, Irvine, vivarium. All animal protocols were approved by the University of California, Irvine, Animal Care and Use Committee.

Animals were immunized by the intramuscular (i.m.) (10 μg/mouse) and subcutaneous (s.c.) (10 μg/mouse) routes with C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP in PBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.05% of Z3-14. To the MOMP, we added 10 μg of CpG oligodeoxynucleotide 1826 (5′-TCCATGACGTTCCTGACGTT-3′) (Coley Pharmaceutical Group, Kanata, Ontario, Canada) and Montanide ISA 720 (Seppic, Inc., Fairfield, NJ) at a 30:70 volume ratio of MOMP plus CpG to Montanide. In another group, 250 μg of alum (Alhydrogel 85; Superfos Biosectr A/S, Kvistgard, Denmark) was used as an adjuvant instead of Montanide ISA 720. The alum group was similarly inoculated with the antigens by both the i.m. and s.c. routes. The mice were boosted two times at 2-week intervals with the same vaccine preparation. As a negative control, the MOMP was replaced with ovalbumin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and another group was inoculated intranasally (i.n.) with Eagle's minimal essential medium (MEM-0). Positive control mice were immunized i.n. once with 104 inclusion-forming units (IFU) of the C. trachomatis MoPn strain. A fertility control group of mice of the same age was kept under the same conditions but was not immunized or challenged.

Mice were challenged in the ovarian bursa 4 weeks after the last i.m.-plus-s.c. boost (35). Briefly, animals were anesthetized, and a lateral abdominal incision was made. C. trachomatis MoPn (105 IFU) was inoculated into the left ovarian bursa, while the right ovarian bursa was inoculated with mock-infected HeLa-229 cell extracts. All experiments were performed twice.

Serum and vaginal antibody titers.Blood was collected by periorbital or heart puncture, and genital samples were collected by washing the vagina twice with 20 μl of PBS (pH 7.2). All immunoassays were performed with the pooled sera or vaginal washes from each group.

The Chlamydia-specific antibody titers in sera and vaginal washes were determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as previously described (33). Briefly, 96-well plates were coated with 100 μl/well of C. trachomatis MoPn EB containing 10 μg/ml of protein in PBS, and 100 μl of serum or 50 μl of vaginal wash was added per well in serial dilutions. Following incubation at 37°C for 1 h, the plates were washed, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgG1, IgG2a, IgM, or IgA (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) was added. The plates were incubated and washed, and the binding was measured in an ELISA reader (Labsystem Multiscan; Helsinki, Finland) using 2,2′-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonate) as the substrate.

In vitro neutralization assays.The in vitro neutralization assay was performed according to the protocol described by Peterson et al. (36). Briefly, twofold serial dilutions of the serum were made in PBS. Duplicate dilutions were incubated for 45 min at 37°C with 1 × 104 IFU of C. trachomatis MoPn. The mixtures were then inoculated by centrifugation onto HeLa-229 cell monolayers grown in 15- by 45-mm glass shell vials. The monolayers were incubated for 30 h and subsequently fixed with methanol, and the inclusions were stained using a cocktail of monoclonal antibodies to Chlamydia prepared in our laboratory. A horseradish peroxidase conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody was added and developed with 0.01% H2O2 and 4-chloro-naphthol (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The results were each expressed as percent inhibition relative to the control sera.

Western blots.Immunoblotting was performed using 250 μg of protein from purified C. trachomatis MoPn EB, electrophoresed in Tricine-SDS polyacrylamide gels (10% acrylamide, 0.3% bisacrylamide [wt/vol]) (43). Following transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, the nonspecific sites were blocked with BLOTTO (Bovine Lacto Transfer Technique Optimizer: 5% [wt/vol] nonfat dried milk, 2 mM CaCl2, and 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0). Serum samples were diluted with PBS and incubated overnight at 4°C. As a positive control we used the monoclonal antibody MoPn-40. Antibody binding was detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody and the reaction detected with 0.01% hydrogen peroxide and 4-chloro-1-naphthol (35).

Lymphocyte proliferation assay.The lymphocyte proliferation assay was performed as previously described (33). In brief, the spleens of two to four mice from each group were collected and splenocytes enriched for T cells by passage over a nylon wool column. Accessory cells for antigen presentation were prepared by irradiating (3,000 rads; 137Cs) syngeneic unseparated spleen cells and incubating them at various ratios with C. trachomatis MoPn EB. Concanavalin A (ConA; Sigma) was used as a positive stimulant at a concentration of 5 μg/ml, and HeLa-229 cell extracts and tissue culture media served as negative controls. At the end of 4 days of incubation, 1.0 μCi of [methyl-3H]thymidine (47 Ci/mmol; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) in 25 μl of RPMI 1640 was added per well, and the incorporation of [3H] was measured using a scintillation counter (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA).

Measurement of cytokines.Levels of gamma interferon (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-4 (IL-4) were determined using commercial kits (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA) with supernatants from splenic T cells stimulated as described above (35).

Genital cultures for C. trachomatis MoPn.Vaginal swabs were collected and cultured at 7-day intervals for a period of 6 weeks following the genital challenge (33). The swabs were vortexed in 200 μl of sterile sucrose-phosphate-glutamic acid medium, and two aliquots from each specimen (100 and 10 μl) were inoculated into McCoy cells grown in 48-well plates with centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 1 h at room temperature. Following incubation at 37°C for 30 h, the chlamydial inclusions were stained as described above.

Fertility studies.At 6 weeks following the intrabursal challenge, groups of four female mice were housed in the same cage with a proven breeder male mouse for a maximum of 18 days (33). Pregnancy was assessed by determining the weight of each mouse. Mice that gained 7 to 10 g of weight by, or before, 18 days postmating were considered to be pregnant. These mice were euthanized, and the number of embryos in each uterine horn was counted. Following the first mating, mice that did not gain weight were mated a second time with a male mouse that had successfully mated with another group of female mice. Pregnancy was followed as described above. All animals that had not gained weight were euthanized 25 days from the start of the second mating.

Statistical analyses.The Mann-Whitney U test, the Fisher exact test, and the Student t test were used for analysis with the Statview IV (Abacus, Berkeley, CA) software program using a Macintosh computer (Cupertino, CA).

RESULTS

Characterization of the C. trachomatis MOMP.The C. trachomatis MOMP was purified using a hydroxylapatite column and characterized by gel electrophoresis and amino acid sequencing. As shown in Fig. 1A, the MOMP migrated as a single band on an SDS-PAGE stained with silver. N-terminal amino acid analysis detected only the sequence L-P-V-G-N-P, corresponding to the mature C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP (data not shown). Based on these results, it was estimated that the C. trachomatis MOMP preparation was 99% pure.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

(A) SDS-PAGE of C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP purified by hydroxyapatite chromatography and stained with silver nitrate. Lane 1, molecular mass standards; lane 2, C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP. (B) Immunoblot of C. trachomatis MoPn EB probed with serum samples collected the day before the genital challenge. Lane 1, molecular mass standards. Probe with serum from mice immunized with the following: MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide (lane 2), ovalbumin plus CpG plus Montanide (lane 3), MOMP plus CpG plus alum (lane 4), ovalbumin plus CpG plus alum (lane 5), C. trachomatis MoPn EB (lane 6), MEM-0 (lane 7), and control monoclonal antibody to the C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP (lane 8).

Immune response following vaccination with the C. trachomatis MOMP.Table 1 shows the results of the characterization of the humoral immune response following vaccination. High Chlamydia-specific IgG antibody titers in serum were observed in the groups of mice immunized i.m. plus s.c. with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide and MOMP plus CpG plus alum. The titer of total IgG was 409,600 in the mice vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide and 102,400 in the group immunized with MOMP plus CpG plus alum. In the group of mice vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide, the titer of IgG2a was 51,200 and the titer of IgG1 was 25,600, indicative of a Th1 response. The mice immunized with MOMP plus CpG plus alum had higher levels of IgG1 (25,600) than of IgG2a (6,400), suggestive of a Th2-biased response. Mice immunized i.n. with C. trachomatis MoPn EB had an IgG serum titer of 102,400. This control group had high levels of IgG2a (25,600) when compared to those of IgG1 (1,600) in serum, indicating a strong Th1 response. Control groups immunized with ovalbumin plus CpG plus Montanide, ovalbumin plus CpG plus alum, or MEM-0 had no detectable antibodies to Chlamydia.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Antibody levels the day before genital challenge

The neutralizing antibody titer in the groups of mice vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide, MOMP plus CpG plus alum, and i.n. with C. trachomatis EB was 1,250 (Table 1). Sera from mice immunized using ovalbumin plus CpG plus Montanide, ovalbumin plus CpG plus alum, or MEM-0 served as controls.

The levels of Chlamydia-specific IgA antibodies in vaginal washes in the mice vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide or MOMP plus CpG plus alum were 160 and 40, respectively. Very high levels of IgA, a titer of 1,280, were detected in the vaginal washes of the mice inoculated i.n. with C. trachomatis EB. No Chlamydia-specific antibodies were detected in the control groups immunized with ovalbumin or MEM-0.

The Western blot using serum collected the day before the genital challenge is shown in Fig. 1B. Mice vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide or with MOMP plus CpG plus alum developed antibodies against MOMP. Animals immunized i.n. with EB had antibodies predominantly to bands of a high molecular weight (>100 kDa), the 60-kDa cysteine-rich protein (crp), the 60-kDa heat shock protein, MOMP, and the 28-kDa protein. Control mice immunized with ovalbumin plus CpG plus Montanide, ovalbumin plus CpG plus alum, or MEM-0 had no antibodies reactive with any of the chlamydial components.

In Table 2 the results of the measurements of the cell-mediated immune response are shown. T lymphocytes from animals vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide or MOMP plus CpG plus alum showed a significant lymphoproliferative response when stimulated with EB, compared with the corresponding control groups immunized with ovalbumin instead of MOMP (P < 0.05). Control BALB/c mice immunized i.n. with C. trachomatis also showed a significant lymphoproliferative response to MoPn EB.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

T-cell response the day before genital challengea

Levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α from supernatants of splenocytes stimulated with EB were significantly higher in the mice vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide and MOMP plus CpG plus alum and in the animals immunized i.n. with C. trachomatis, compared with their respective control groups immunized with ovalbumin plus CpG plus Montanide, ovalbumin plus CpG plus alum, or MEM-0. The levels of IL-4 were very low, or below the level of detection, in all the groups entered in the study.

Vaginal cultures for C. trachomatis MoPn.Four weeks after the last i.m.-plus-s.c. immunization, the mice were challenged in the genital tract with the C. trachomatis MoPn and the course of the infection was followed with weekly vaginal cultures. As shown in Table 3, C. trachomatis was recovered from only 15% (3/20) of the mice vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide. Similarly, only 14% (3/21) of the mice immunized i.n. with C. trachomatis had positive vaginal cultures. In contrast, 85% (17/20) of the animals immunized with ovalbumin plus CpG plus Montanide and 75% (15/20) of the controls immunized with MEM-0 had positive vaginal cultures (P < 0.05). The protection observed in the MOMP-plus-CpG-plus-alum-vaccinated group was not very strong. A total of 75% (15/20) of the mice in this group had positive vaginal cultures during the 6 weeks of observation, in comparison with 95% (19/20) in the group immunized with ovalbumin plus CpG plus alum (P > 0.05).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Results of vaginal cultures

The lengths of time the vaginal cultures were positive and the numbers of Chlamydia IFU recovered were also significantly different between the groups. For example, the mice vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide and the controls immunized i.n. with C. trachomatis EB had positive cultures for only 2 weeks and 1 week, respectively, while the animals immunized with ovalbumin plus CpG plus Montanide and with MEM-0 had positive vaginal cultures for a period of 4 weeks. Furthermore, the number of C. trachomatis IFU recovered from the vaginal cultures during the first 2 weeks after the challenge was significantly lower in the MOMP-plus-CpG-plus-Montanide group and C. trachomatis EB i.n.-immunized groups when compared with the corresponding control animals (P < 0.05). In the group vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus alum, positive cultures were obtained for a period of 3 weeks after the vaginal challenge. The percentage of mice with positive cultures and the number of IFU recovered per animal were significantly lower for the first 2 weeks after the challenge, compared with the control mice immunized with ovalbumin plus CpG plus alum (P < 0.05).

Fertility studies.Six weeks after the animals were challenged in the genital tract, male mice were housed in the same cage with the females and the mice were followed over a course of two mating cycles. The results of the fertility studies are shown in Table 4. The mice vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide, the controls immunized i.n. with C. trachomatis, and the fertility control group all had equivalent fertility rates of 75% (15/20), 81% (17/21), and 83% (20/24), respectively (P > 0.05). The numbers of embryos in the challenged left uterine horn and the total numbers of embryos per mouse were also comparable for these three groups. For example, in the group vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide and the one immunized i.n. with EB, the mean number of embryos in the left uterine horn was 2.6, while in the fertility control the mean was 2.7 (P > 0.05). Fertility rates, however, were not maintained in the group vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus alum. Only 35% (7/20) of these mice had embryos in both uterine horns, in comparison to 83% (20/24) in the fertility control group (P < 0.05). Similarly, the numbers of embryos in the left uterine horn were significantly different between the two groups (0.9 versus 2.7; P < 0.05). The animals immunized with ovalbumin plus CpG plus Montanide and ovalbumin plus CpG plus alum had fertility rates similar to those of the group immunized with MEM-0, and all were significantly lower than the fertility rates of the mice vaccinated with MOMP plus CpG plus Montanide and with C. trachomatis EB.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Results of fertility studies

DISCUSSION

Here we have shown that vaccination of mice with a purified preparation of the C. trachomatis MoPn MOMP, using two adjuvants that are currently in human clinical trials, can induce protection against a genital challenge. The level of protection against infection and disease obtained with the MOMP was equivalent to that resulting following i.n. immunization with viable C. trachomatis EB. In mice vaccinated with MOMP, the severity and duration of the infection were similar to those observed in animals immunized with EB. In addition, the fertility rate in the animals vaccinated with MOMP paralleled that observed in mice immunized with C. trachomatis EB and in the fertility control group.

Work performed by several groups of investigators over the last 3 decades pointed to the MOMP as the antigen most likely involved in stimulating the protective immune response against a chlamydial infection (2, 10, 39, 46). However, attempts to induce protection in several animal models using recombinant MOMP, peptides corresponding to regions of this protein, or DNA plasmids containing the gene for the MOMP yielded, for the most part, disappointing results (4, 7, 31, 48, 50, 51, 57, 58). More encouraging results were obtained using outer membrane complexes of Chlamydia and with dendritic cells pulsed ex vivo with nonviable EB (3, 34, 49). These data suggest either that antigens other than the MOMP are necessary for inducing protection or that the conformation of the MOMP is critical for eliciting a protective immune response.

In an attempt to maintain the native conformation of the MOMP, we developed a protocol using zwitterionic detergents to extract this protein directly from C. trachomatis (32, 35). Blake and Gotschlich (5) described the ability of the zwitterionic detergent Z3-14 to maintain the native conformation of the porin A from Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Thus, we utilized Z3-14 to extract and to purify the MOMP directly from C. trachomatis EB. The outer membrane of Chlamydia has three cysteine-rich proteins, including the MOMP and the 60-kDa and 12-kDa proteins, that may be linked by disulfide bonds (16). We used DTT during the extraction procedure; thus, following purification, in an attempt to regain the native conformation of the MOMP, we incorporated a refolding step to oxidize the disulfide bonds. In this preparation we have now characterized two disulfide bonds with intramolecular pairs formed between Cys48 and Cys55 and between Cys201 and Cys203 (56). Furthermore, we have shown, by using monoclonal antibodies to conformational epitopes, that this natural MOMP maintains at least part of its native trimeric structure (56).

Immunization of mice with this preparation of MOMP using Freund's adjuvant elicited significant protection against a genital challenge (35). Although Freund's is an adjuvant that has been extensively tested in animal models, due to its negative effects it cannot be utilized in humans. CD4 Th1 cells have been shown to play a critical role in protection against a primary and secondary challenge with C. trachomatis MoPn, while B cells and/or antibodies appear to be important only against a secondary challenge (27-29). Based on this information, we decided to test adjuvants that induce predominantly a Th1 immune response and are safe for humans. We initially showed that natural MOMP, administered with CpG plus alum, can induce significant protection against a respiratory challenge with C. trachomatis MoPn (32). Here, in addition to testing CpG plus alum as adjuvants, we also utilized a combination of CpG plus Montanide ISA 720. Alum is an adjuvant that favors a Th2 response (23). On the other hand, the combination of CpG plus Montanide ISA 720 has been found to enhance the Th1 response against malarial antigens (17). Montanide ISA 720 is an oil adjuvant that renders water in oil emulsions when mixed with an aqueous phase. The slow release of the antigen and its protection from proteolytic enzymes by this type of adjuvant may also have helped to induce a protective immune response (12). Using this approach, we were able to elicit an immune response against an intrabursal challenge that is as protective as that obtained with viable Chlamydia. These results now open the possibility of testing a vaccine formulated with MOMP to protect humans against trachoma and genital infections.

There are several limitations in this model that will have to be addressed before human trials can be implemented. The need to purify the MOMP directly from Chlamydia significantly curtails the feasibility of producing the antigen in large quantities. In addition to the cost of growing large amounts of Chlamydia, the extraction, purification, and refolding of the MOMP will add significant expense to the preparation of the vaccine. Furthermore, concerns about adventitious agents that may be present in the tissue culture system will have to be addressed. Some of these limitations could be solved if recombinant MOMP preparations became available. However, production of an efficacious recombinant protein may pose specific challenges. For example, formulating a recombinant MOMP may be difficult if conformational epitopes are required for protection. Similarly, the assembly of a biochemically engineered immunogen will require the identification and characterization of the protective epitopes.

Another potential shortcoming of using the MOMP as a vaccine is the questionable ability of this immunogen to offer broad protection against multiple C. trachomatis serovars. In our opinion, this limitation may only be relative and can be overcome. Work by Wang and Grayston (52, 53) using a murine model indicated that most of the human C. trachomatis serovars can be divided into two main groups: the C group, comprising serovars C, J, H, I, and A, and the B group that includes serovars B, Ba, E, D, L1, and L2. Serovars K and L3 are related to the C complex, while G and F are related to the B complex. Within each group there is a senior-to-junior relationship. For example, in the C group, the C serovar is the senior isolate. The C serovar cross-reacts and protects against the other four serovars in the group, including A, the most junior serovar (52, 53). Thus, the MOMP from serovar C, for the C group, and the MOMP from serovar B, for the B group, could potentially induce protection against the rest of the serovars in each group. It is then possible that a vaccine that included the MOMPs from the most senior serovars of the C and B groups and the MOMPs from the G and K serovars could protect against all the human C. trachomatis serovars (38, 52, 53). The apparent serovar specificity of the protection induced during the vaccination trials for trachoma was probably due to the fact that the two most common serovars causing this disease are C and B (15, 42). These two serovars are in different groups, and thus there is minimal or no cross-protection.

Furthermore, once the protective regions of the MOMP from a serovar are identified, it may be possible to use that information to construct a polyvalent vaccine with broad coverage. It is also important to point out that most of the urogenital infections are produced by serovars D, E, and F (25, 53). Even more important, a vaccine with limited antigenic determinants may significantly affect the epidemiology of these diseases (11). However, in this case, the possibility that the Chlamydia isolates not included in the vaccine will spread throughout the population will have to be considered. Including a protective antigen that is common to all the serovars will address this problem. Unfortunately, at this point, a shared protective immunogen has not been identified.

The intrabursal model that we have tested has shortcomings, since it does not parallel the natural route of infection. A particular concern is the fact that the mechanisms of protection in the lower genital tract may differ from those in the upper genital tract (21). On the other hand, directly challenging the site we are interested in protecting may provide more stringent proof of the efficacy of the vaccine. The feasibility of determining the ability of Chlamydia to disseminate from one uterine horn to the other is also one of the advantages of using the intrabursal versus the vaginal challenge. With the intravaginal model, in order to increase the susceptibility to infection and facilitate the development of infertility, the mice are treated with progesterone before they are challenged (39). Progesterone has a strong immunomodulatory effect in mice and humans. In particular, progesterone induces a shift from Th1 to a Th2 response (19, 20, 37). Unfortunately, a Th1 response is considered to be necessary for protection against a C. trachomatis infection (27, 29). As a result, treating mice with progesterone before the intravaginal challenge may mask the protective effects of a vaccine. For example, in the case of herpes simplex virus, it has been reported that prolonged exposure of mice to progesterone prevented the induction of protective responses following immunization (13). Moreover, treatment of rhesus macaques with Depo-Provera before intravaginal challenge with simian immunodeficiency virus abrogated the protection induced by a vaccine with an attenuated lentivirus (1).

In conclusion, we have shown that vaccination with the C. trachomatis MOMP can induce an immune response in mice that is as protective as that resulting from immunization with live organisms. Furthermore, this protection was achieved using adjuvants that are effective and tolerated by humans. We realize that translating this finding from a murine model to a vaccine for humans is going to require a significant amount of work. Recent advances in genomics, proteomics, and molecular engineering should help address this challenge.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Public Health Service grant AI-32248 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 4 July 2005.
    • Returned for modification 7 August 2005.
    • Accepted 14 September 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Abel, K., T. Rourke, D. Lu, K. Bost, M. B. McChesney, and C. J. Miller. 2004. Abrogation of attenuated lentivirus-induced protection in rhesus macaques by administration of Depo-Provera before intravaginal challenge with simian immunodeficiency virus mac239. J. Infect. Dis.190:1697-1705.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Baher, W., Y. X. Zhang, T. Joseph, H. Su, F. E. Nano. K. D. E. Everett, and H. D. Caldwell. 1988. Mapping antigenic domains expressed by Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA85:4000-4004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Batteiger, B. E., R. G. Rank, P. M. Bavoil, and L. S. Soderberg. 1993. Partial protection against genital reinfection by immunization of guinea-pigs with isolated outer-membrane proteins of the chlamydial agent of guinea-pig inclusion conjunctivitis. J. Gen. Microbiol.139:2965-2972.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Berry, L. J., D. K. Hickey, K. A. Skelding, S. Bao, A. M. Rendina, P. M. Hansbro, C. M. Gockel, and K. W. Beagley. 2004. Transcutaneous immunization with combined cholera toxin and CpG adjuvant protects against Chlamydia muridarum genital tract infection. Infect. Immun.72:1019-1028.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Blake, M. S., and E. C. Gotschlich. 1984. Purification and partial characterization of the opacity-associated proteins of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J. Exp. Med.159:452-462.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Caldwell, H. D., J. Kromhout, and J. Schachter. 1981. Purification and characterization of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect. Immun.31:1161-1176.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Cheng, X., S. Pal, L. M. de la Maza, and E. M. Peterson. 1992. Characterization of the humoral response induced by a peptide corresponding to variable domain IV of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar E. Infect. Immun.60:3428-3432.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Davis, H. L., C. L. Cooper, M. L. Morris, S. M. Elfer, D. W. Cameron, and J. Heathcote. 2000. CpG ODN is safe and highly effective in humans as adjuvant to HBV vaccine: preliminary results of phase I trial with CpG ODN 7909. Third Annual Conference on Vaccine Research, abstr. S25.
  9. 9.↵
    de la Maza, L. M., S. Pal, A. Khamesipour, and E. M. Peterson. 1994. Intravaginal inoculation of mice with the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis biovar results in infertility. Infect. Immun.62:2094-2097.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    de la Maza, L. M., and E. M. Peterson. 2002. Vaccines for Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs3:980-986.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    de la Maza, M. A., and L. M. de la Maza. 1995. A new computer model for estimating the impact of vaccination protocols and its application to the study of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections. Vaccine13:119-127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Engers, H., M. P. Kieny, P. Malhotra, and J. R. Pink. 2003. Third meeting on novel adjuvants currently in or close to clinical testing. World Health Organization—Organisation Mondiale de la Sante, Fondation Merieux, Annecy, France, 7-9 January 2002. Vaccine21:3503-3524.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Gillgrass, A. E., A. A. Ashkar, K. L. Rosenthal, and C. Kaushic. 2003. Prolonged exposure to progesterone prevents induction of protective mucosal responses following intravaginal immunization with attenuated herpes simplex virus type 2. J. Virol.77:9845-9851.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Grayston, J. T., and S.-P. Wang. 1975. New knowledge of chlamydiae and the diseases they cause. J. Infect. Dis.132:87-105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Grayston, J. T., and S. P. Wang. 1978. The potential for vaccine against infection of the genital tract with Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex. Transm. Dis.5:73-77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Hatch, T. P. 1996. Disulfide cross-linked envelope proteins: the functional equivalent of peptidoglycan in chlamydiae? J. Bacteriol.178:1-5.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Hirunpetcharat, C., J. Wipasa, S. Sakkhachornphop, T. Nitkumhan, Y. Z. Zheng, S. Pichyangkul, A. M. Krieg, D. S. Walsh, D. G. Heppner, and M. F. Good. 2003. CpG oligodeoxynucleotide enhances immunity against blood-stage malaria infection in mice parenterally immunized with a yeast-expressed 19 kDa carboxyl-terminal fragment of Plasmodium yoelii merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP119) formulated in oil-based Montanides. Vaccine21:2923-2932.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Igietseme, J. U., C. M. Black, and H. D. Caldwell. 2002. Chlamydia vaccines: strategies and status. BioDrugs16:19-35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Kaushic, C., A. D. Murdin, B. J. Underdown, and C. R. Wira. 1998. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the female reproductive tract of the rat: influence of progesterone on infectivity and immune response. Infect. Immun.66:893-898.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Kaushic, C., F. Zhou, B. J. Underdown, and C. R. Wira. 2000. Effects of estradiol and progesterone on susceptibility and early immune responses to Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the female reproductive tract. Infect. Immun.68:4207-4216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    Kelly, K. A., J. C. Walker, S. H. Jameel, H. L. Gray, and R. G. Rank. 2000. Differential regulation of CD4 lymphocyte recruitment between the upper and lower regions of the genital tract during Chlamydia infection. Infect. Immun.68:1519-1528.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    LaMontagne, D. S., D. N. Fine, and J. M. Marrazzo. 2003. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic men. Am. J. Prev. Med.24:36-42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Lindblad, E. B. 2004. Aluminium adjuvants—in retrospect and prospect. Vaccine22:3658-3668.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Miller, W. C., C. A. Ford, M. Morris, M. S. Handcock, J. L. Schmitz, M. M. Hubbs, M. S. Cohen, K. M. Harris, and J. R. Udry. 2004. Prevalence of chlamydial and gonococcal infections among young adults in the United States. JAMA291:2229-2236.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Millman, K., C. M. Black, R. E. Johnson, W. E. Stamm, R. B. Jones, E. W. Hook, D. H. Martin, G. Bolan, S. Tavare, and D. Dean. 2004. Population-based genetic and evolutionary analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital strain variation in the United States. J. Bacteriol.186:2457-2465.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    Morrison, R. P., R. J. Belland, K. Lyng, and H. D. Caldwell. 1989. Chlamydial disease pathogenesis. The 57-kDa chlamydial hypersensitivity antigen is a stress response protein. J. Exp. Med.170:113-122.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    Morrison, R. P., and H. D. Caldwell. 2002. Immunity to murine chlamydial genital infection. Infect. Immun.70:2741-2751.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  28. 28.
    Morrison, S. G., and R. P. Morrison. 2001. Resolution of secondary Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infection in immune mice with depletion of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Infect. Immun.69:2643-2649.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Morrison, S. G., H. Su, H. D. Caldwell, and R. P. Morrison. 2000. Immunity to murine Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract reinfection involves B cells and CD4+ T cells but not CD8+ T cells. Infect. Immun.68:6979-6987.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Nigg, C. 1942. An unidentified virus which produces pneumonia and systemic infection in mice. Science99:49-50.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Pal, S., K. M. Barnhart, Q. Wei, A. M. Abai, E. M. Peterson, and L. M. de la Maza. 1999. Vaccination of mice with DNA plasmids coding for the Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein elicits an immune response but fails to protect against a genital challenge. Vaccine17:459-465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Pal, S., H. L. Davis, E. M. Peterson, and L. M. de la Maza. 2002. Immunization with the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis major outer membrane protein by use of CpG oligodeoxynucleotides as an adjuvant induces a protective immune response against an intranasal chlamydial challenge. Infect. Immun.70:4812-4817.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Pal, S., T. J. Fielder, E. M. Peterson, and L. M. de la Maza. 1994. Protection against infertility in a BALB/c mouse salpingitis model by intranasal immunization with the mouse pneumonitis biovar of Chlamydia trachomatis. Infect. Immun.62:3354-3362.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Pal, S., I. Theodor, E. M. Peterson, and L. M. de la Maza. 1997. Immunization with an acellular vaccine consisting of the outer membrane complex of Chlamydia trachomatis induces protection against a genital challenge. Infect. Immun.65:3361-3369.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Pal, S., I. Theodor, E. M. Peterson, and L. M. de la Maza. 2001. Immunization with the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis major outer membrane protein can elicit a protective immune response against a genital challenge. Infect. Immun.69:6240-6247.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Peterson, E. M., G. Zhong, E. Carlson, and L. M. de la Maza. 1988. Protective role of magnesium in the neutralization by antibodies of Chlamydia trachomatis infectivity. Infect. Immun.56:885-891.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Piccinni, M. P., M. G. Giudizi, R. Biagiotti, L. Beloni, L. Giannarini, S. Sampognaro, P. Parronchi, R. Manetti, F. Annunziato, C. Livi, S. Romagnani, and E. Maggi. 1995. Progesterone favors the development of human T helper cells producing Th2-type cytokines and promotes IL-4 production and membrane CD30 expression in established Th1 cell clones. J. Immunol.155:128-133.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  38. 38.↵
    Ramsey, K. H., T. W. Cotter, R. D. Salyer, G. S. Miranpuri, M. A. Yanez, C. E. Poulsen, J. L. DeWolfe, and G. I. Byrne. 1999. Prior genital tract infection with a murine or human biovar of Chlamydia trachomatis protects mice against heterotypic challenge infection. Infect. Immun.67:3019-3025.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Rank, R. G. 1999. Models of immunity, p. 239-296. In R. S. Stephens (ed.), Chlamydia: intracellular biology, pathogenesis and immunity. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  40. 40.↵
    Rodriguez-Marañon, M. J., R. M. Bush, E. M. Peterson, T. Schirmer, and L. M. de la Maza. 2002. Prediction of the membrane-spanning beta-strands of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia. Protein Sci.11:1854-1861.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  41. 41.↵
    Schachter, J. 1999. Infection and disease epidemiology, p. 139-170. In R. S. Stephens (ed.), Chlamydia: intracellular biology, pathogenesis and immunity. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
  42. 42.↵
    Schachter, J., and C. Dawson. 1978. Human chlamydial infections. PSG Publishing Company, Inc., Littleton, Mass.
  43. 43.↵
    Schagger, H., and G. von Jagow. 1987. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem.166:368-379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Stamm, W. E. 1999. Chlamydia trachomatis infections of the adult, p. 407-422. In K. K. Holmes et al. (ed.), Sexually transmitted diseases. McGraw-Hill, New York, N.Y.
  45. 45.↵
    Stephens, R. S., R. Sanchez-Pescador, E. A. Wagar, C. Inouye, and M. S. Urdea. 1987. Diversity of Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein genes. J. Bacteriol.169:3879-3885.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    Stephens, R. S., E. A. Wagar, and G. K. Schoolnick. 1988. High-resolution mapping of serovar-specific and common antigenic determinants of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. J. Exp. Med.167:817-831.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Stratton, K. R., J. S. Durch, and R. S. Lawrence (ed.). 2000. Vaccines for the 21st century: a tool for decision making. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  48. 48.↵
    Su, H., and H. D. Caldwell. 1992. Immunogenicity of a chimeric peptide corresponding to T helper and B cell epitopes of the Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein. J. Exp. Med.75:227-235.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    Su, H., R. Messer, W. Whitmire, E. Fisher, J. C. Portis, and H. D. Caldwell. 1998. Vaccination against chlamydial genital tract infection after immunization with dendritic cells pulsed ex vivo with nonviable Chlamydiae. J. Exp. Med.188:809-818.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Taylor, H. R., J. Whittum-Hudson, J. Schachter, H. D. Caldwell, and R. A. Prendergast. 1988. Oral immunization with chlamydial major outer membrane protein (MOMP). Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.29:1847-1853.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    Tuffrey, M., F. Alexander, W. Conlan, C. Woods, and M. Ward. 1992. Heterotypic protection of mice against chlamydial salpingitis and colonization of the lower genital tract with a human serovar F isolate of Chlamydia trachomatis by prior immunization with recombinant serovar L1 major outer-membrane protein. J. Gen. Microbiol.148:1707-1715.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    Wang, S.-P., and J. T. Grayston. 1963. Classification of trachoma virus strains by protection of mice from toxic death. J. Immunol.90:849-856.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    Wang, S.-P., and J. T. Grayston. 1984. Micro-immunofluorescence serology of Chlamydia trachomatis, p. 87-118. In L. M. de la Maza and E. M. Peterson (ed.), Medical virology III. Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
  54. 54.↵
    Weeratna, R. D., M. J. McCluskie, Y. Xu, and H. L. Davis. 2000. CpG DNA induces stronger immune responses with less toxicity than other adjuvants. Vaccine18:1755-1762.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    Westrom, L., R. Joesoef, G. Reynolds, A. Hagdu, and S. E. Thompson. 1992. Pelvic inflammatory disease and fertility: a cohort study of 1,844 women with laparoscopically verified disease and 657 control women with normal laparoscopy. Sex. Transm. Dis.19:185-192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 56.↵
    Yen, T.-T., S. Pal, and L. M. de la Maza. 2005. Characterization of the disulfide bonds and free cysteine residues of the Chlamydia trachomatis mouse pneumonitis major outer membrane protein. Biochemistry44:6250-6256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    Zhang, D. J., J. Berry, C. Shen, G. McClarty, and R. C. Brunham. 1997. DNA vaccination with the major outer-membrane protein gene induces immunity to Chlamydia trachomatis (mouse pneumonitis infection). J. Infect. Dis.176:1035-1040.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    Zhang, D.-J., X. Yang, C. Shen, H. Lu, A. Murdin, and R. C. Brunham. 2000. Priming with Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein (MOMP) DNA followed by MOMP ISCOM boosting enhances protection and is associated with increased immunoglobulin A and Th1 cellular immune responses. Infect. Immun.68:3074-3078.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Vaccination with the Chlamydia trachomatis Major Outer Membrane Protein Can Elicit an Immune Response as Protective as That Resulting from Inoculation with Live Bacteria
Sukumar Pal, Ellena M. Peterson, Luis M. de la Maza
Infection and Immunity Nov 2005, 73 (12) 8153-8160; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.12.8153-8160.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Vaccination with the Chlamydia trachomatis Major Outer Membrane Protein Can Elicit an Immune Response as Protective as That Resulting from Inoculation with Live Bacteria
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Vaccination with the Chlamydia trachomatis Major Outer Membrane Protein Can Elicit an Immune Response as Protective as That Resulting from Inoculation with Live Bacteria
Sukumar Pal, Ellena M. Peterson, Luis M. de la Maza
Infection and Immunity Nov 2005, 73 (12) 8153-8160; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.12.8153-8160.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Vaccines
Chlamydia Infections
Chlamydia trachomatis
Porins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522