Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Molecular Pathogenesis

Citrobacter rodentium lifA/efa1 Is Essential for Colonic Colonization and Crypt Cell Hyperplasia In Vivo

Jan-Michael A. Klapproth, Maiko Sasaki, Melanie Sherman, Brian Babbin, Michael S. Donnenberg, Paula J. Fernandes, Isabel C. A. Scaletsky, Daniel Kalman, Asma Nusrat, Ifor R. Williams
Jan-Michael A. Klapproth
1Division of Digestive Diseases
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jklappr@emory.edu
Maiko Sasaki
1Division of Digestive Diseases
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Melanie Sherman
2Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian Babbin
2Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael S. Donnenberg
3Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paula J. Fernandes
3Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isabel C. A. Scaletsky
4Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia, e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Kalman
2Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Asma Nusrat
2Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ifor R. Williams
2Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1441-1451.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    The C. rodentium lifA/efa1 gene. The lifA/efa1 gene from C. rodentium was identified on cosmid clone p3-B-8 by testing bacterial lysates in an inhibitory assay and cross hybridization with an internal EcoRI fragment from EPEC strain E2348/69 lifA/efa1. The D-X-D motif in C. rodentium lifA/efa1, encoding a glycosyltransferase activity and inactivating small GTP-binding proteins, is also present in large clostridial cytotoxins. The protease motif is present in avirulence proteins of plant pathogens and YopT, and it disrupts the actin cytoskeleton in host cells. The third distinct motif present in C. rodentium lifA/efa1 encodes an aminotransferase II. Areas in grey indicate domains with significant sequence similarities to known motifs present in other gram-negative bacteria. Three domains of the lifA/efa1 gene in C. rodentium were mutated, generating mutant GlM12, PrMC31, and EID3 (arrows).

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    (A) Bacterial lysates from lifA/efa1 mutant strain EID3 lose IL-2 inhibitory activity. PBMC (106/ml) were preincubated for 2 h with increasing concentrations (ranging from 2.5 to 50 μg/ml) of bacterial lysates from EPEC (♦), C. rodentium wild type (▪), lifA/efa1 mutant strain EID3 (▴), and complemented mutant EI3B8 (•). Lymphocyte cultures were activated with the combination of pokeweed mitogen (10 μg/ml) and phorbol myristate acetate (10 ng/ml). After a total of 24 h of incubation, supernatants were aspirated and analyzed in duplicate by ELISA. Data from three independent experiments were pooled, and mean values with SE normalized against values for the positive control were set at 100%. Unlike lysates from generated from EPEC, C. rodentium, and EI3B8, lysates from lifA/efa1 mutant EID3 failed to inhibit expression of IL-2 protein in activated lymphocyte cultures. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05) at concentrations of 5 μg/ml and greater for C. rodentium EI3B8 than for lysates fromEID3. Statistical differences were determined by Student's t test and considered significant if P was ≤ 0.05. (B) Formation of attaching lesions in 3T3 cells in response to infection with EPEC, C. rodentium (CrWT), EID3, and EI3B8. 3T3 cell cultures were infected with EPEC, C. rodentium, EID3, and EI3B8 for 5 h, rinsed in PBS, fixed in paraformaldehyde, and stained for nucleic acids and filamentous actin. Images were obtained with a Zeiss Axiscope and digital imaging package. The accumulation of filamentous actin underneath the site of bacterial adherence was not affected by a mutation in lifA/efa1, as mutant and wild-type bacteria induced similar attaching lesions in 3T3 fibroblast cultures. (C) Quantification of bacterial adherence to fibroblast cultures. 3T3 cells were infected with 5 × 104 CFU of wild-type EPEC and C. rodentium (CrWT), lifA/efa1 mutant EID3, and complemented strain EI3B8. Infection was allowed to proceed for 4 h, when cell cultures were washed three times with PBS and lysed in 1% Triton X-100. Serial dilutions were plated on MacConkey agar plates, incubated overnight, and enumerated the following morning. Bacterial adherence to fibroblast cells was determined in triplicate in three independent experiments. Data are expressed as means, with error bars representing SE of the means, and were subjected to Student's t test for statistical analysis (P ≤ 0.05). Regardless of the presence or absence of an intact lifA/efa1 gene, wild-type and mutant C. rodentium adhered with equal efficiency to fibroblast cultures at 4 h of infection.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Weight chart for mice infected with EPEC and C. rodentium strains. Enteric infection of groups of five mice with EPEC (♦), C. rodentium (▪), EID3 (▴), and EI3B8 (•) was initiated by gavage with 3 × 108 CFU/animal in 100 μl of PBS on day 0. Animals were weighed daily until day 20 of infection, and data are expressed as means with error bars for SE. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t test, and results were considered significant if P was ≤0.05. In comparison to mice infected with wild-type C. rodentium, EID3 did not induce signs and symptoms of systemic disease, and animals gained weight throughout the 20-day experiment. Weight gain for control mice (○) and animals infected with EID3 and EPEC was indistinguishable.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Transmission electron microscopy of EPEC, C. rodentium wild type, EID3, and EI3B8 on day 8 of infection. Morphology of colonic tissue from infected mice at day 8 of infection was evaluated by transmission electron microscopy. Epithelial pedestal-like structures consistent with A/E lesions were observed in the apical pole of epithelial cells infected with C. rodentium wild type (CrWT), EID3, and EI3B8.

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Bacterial counts of EPEC, C. rodentium, EID3, and EI3B8 isolated from the colon of infected mice. Following inoculation with EPEC (♦), C. rodentium (▪), EID3 (▴), and EI3B8 (•) (A), wild-type C. rodentium (▪), GlM12 (▵), and PrM31 (○) (B) on day 0, animals were sacrificed on day 2, 8, 14, or 20. Fecal pellets were removed from the distal colon of infected animals, and tissue was weighed and homogenized at low speed. Serial dilutions were plated on MacConkey agar, and recovered bacteria were counted the following day. Data depict the mean CFU per gram of colon tissue of infected animals, with bars representing the SE of the mean. Nonparametric analysis of organ colonization counts was performed by the Mann-Whitney U test. (A) Wild-type C. rodentium (▪) and mutant EID3 (▴) were able to colonize the colon of infected animals with equal efficiency until day 8, after which EID3 was rapidly cleared from the colon, decreasing to levels similar to the CFU determined for EPEC (♦). (B) Mutations in the glycosyltransferase (▵) and protease motif (○) resulted in significantly reduced colonic colonization throughout the infection in comparison to wild-type C. rodentium infection (▪).

  • FIG. 6.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 6.

    Time course of epithelial cell regenerative and histological changes in response to infection with EPEC, C. rodentium, EID3, and EI3B8. (A) Epithelial regenerative changes for all animals per group were analyzed by two pathologists in a blinded manner on days 2, 8, 14, and 20. The analysis included control animals and mice infected with EPEC, C. rodentium (CrWT), EID3, and EI3B8. Cytological changes were graded as 1+ (no changes), 2+ (minimal, involving crypts with ≤20% increases in mucosal thickness), 3+ (mild, extending up to half crypt height with 20 to 80% increases in mucosal thickness), 4+ (moderate, extending over half of crypt height with surface maturation and with 80 to 100% increases in mucosal thickness), and 5+ (florid, involving entire crypt and surface epithelium with >100% increases in mucosal thickness). Scores determined for epithelial regenerative changes were analyzed by Student's t test (P ≤ 0.05). Interestingly, all infected animals responded with increased regenerative scores on days 2, 8, 14, and 20 of infection. A statistically significant difference inregeneration was determined on day 20 of infection in a comparison of scores obtained for EID3 and C. rodentium wild type. (B) Distal colonic sections from each animal were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin, and transverse 5-μm sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. In comparison to control mice inoculated with PBS, all groups responded with increased regenerative scores. TMCH developed only in wild-type C. rodentium (Cr WT)-infected mice by day 8 and increased in severity by day 20.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study

    Strain or plasmidDescriptionSource or reference
    EPEC E2348/69O126:H6 isolate from infant diarrhea 22a
    C. rodentium Wild type causing and TMCH and colitisATCC
    pKD46Red recombinase system 7
    pKD4PCR template for Km cassette and FRT 7
    pFT-AHelper plasmid encoding for recombinase 32a
    p3-B-8 C. rodentium lifA/efal cosmid cloneThis study
    CrpKD46 C. rodentium wild type transformed with pKD46This study
    EIB2K1Kanamycin insertion mutation at bp position 3,496This study
    EID3Kanamycin-cured lifA/efa1 non-motif mutantThis study
    EI3B8EID3 complemented lifA/efa1 on plasmid p3-B-8This study
    G1M9Kanamycin insertion mutation at bp position 1,672This study
    G1M12Kanamycin-cured lifA/efa1 glycosyltransferase motif mutantThis study
    PrMC1Kanamycin insertion mutation at bp position 3,456This study
    PrMC31Kanamycin-cured lifA/efa1 protease motif mutantThis study
  • TABLE 2.

    PCR primer combinations for molecular methods

    Primer nameSequenceaDescription
    Klapp-1105′-ATGGATATTAATACTGAAACTGAG-3′Gam protein
    Klapp-1115′-TTATACCTCTGAATCAATATCAAC-3′Gam protein
    Klapp-1125′-ATGACACCGGACATTATCCTGCAG-3′Exonuclease
    Klapp-1135′-TCATCGCCATTGCTCCCCAAATAC-3′Exonuclease
    Klapp-1025′-ACAATAAATGGACTAGGGATAACAGGTGTACACACTGCAGAATGCCTGCTACCGGCACCAgtgtaggctggagctgcttc-3′bp 3,496-3,555, lifA/efa1-pKD4
    Klapp-1035′-CAAATTGTCAAAACCATCAGCAGCACTGACCATCACCTGTTCTGTAATTTTTCCGTTAATcatatgaatatcctccttag-3′bp 3,640-3,669, lifA/efa1-pKD4
    Klapp-1655′-TACTGTATTATGAAGGGAGTTACAGATATTAATGATGAGTTACGAGTAAACTATgtgtaggctggagctgcttc-3′bp 1,297-1,350, lifA/efa1-pKD4 (glycosyltransferase motif)
    Klapp-1675′-ACGTAGCTTTAAGTCTTCCAGGAAACGATTATCTCCATTTGTTTCCATCATAATcatatgaatatcctccttag-3′bp 1,672-1,725, lifA/efa1-pKD4 (glycosyltransferase motif)
    Klapp-1695′-CATGCACAGGGATGGTTCGAAGTGGCCAAAGGATATGGCAGCCAGAATATTGACgtgtaggctggagctgcttc-3′bp 4,303-4,356, lifA/efa1-pKD4 (protease motif)
    Klapp-1705′-TAATTGTATACCAGCCTCAATAAACTTCAGAGCATCCAGGGAAGAAAGGAAATCcatatgaatatcctccttag-3′bp 4,441-4,494, lifA/efa1-pKD4 (protease motif)
    Klapp-1875′-TACTGTATTATGAAGGGAGTTA-3′bp 1,297-1,318, lifA/efa1
    Klapp-1885′-AAGCCCACGTATATTCCATCCG-3′bp 1,938-1,959, lifA/efa1
    Klapp-1365′-AGCAGACGAGTTCAAGGGATA-3′bp 3,363-3,383, lifA/efa1
    Klapp-1375′-CAAATTGTCAAAACCATCAGC-3′bp 3,649-3,669, lifA/efa1
    Klapp-2015′-ATCGTTGAACACGCCAAATAT-3′bp 4,249-4,269, lifA/efa1
    Klapp-2025′-TCTGGTCATCAGGGCATTATC-3′bp 4,528-4,548, lifA/efa1
    Klapp-2565′-AATTCTCATGTTTGACAGCT-3′pHC79
    Klapp-2575′-AATTCTCATGTTTGACAGCT-3′pHC79
    • ↵ a Uppercase letters, nucleotides with C. rodentium lifA/efa1-specific sequences; lowercase letters, nucleotides recognizing sequences upstream and downstream of the kanamycin resistance cassette in pKD4.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Citrobacter rodentium lifA/efa1 Is Essential for Colonic Colonization and Crypt Cell Hyperplasia In Vivo
Jan-Michael A. Klapproth, Maiko Sasaki, Melanie Sherman, Brian Babbin, Michael S. Donnenberg, Paula J. Fernandes, Isabel C. A. Scaletsky, Daniel Kalman, Asma Nusrat, Ifor R. Williams
Infection and Immunity Feb 2005, 73 (3) 1441-1451; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1441-1451.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Citrobacter rodentium lifA/efa1 Is Essential for Colonic Colonization and Crypt Cell Hyperplasia In Vivo
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Citrobacter rodentium lifA/efa1 Is Essential for Colonic Colonization and Crypt Cell Hyperplasia In Vivo
Jan-Michael A. Klapproth, Maiko Sasaki, Melanie Sherman, Brian Babbin, Michael S. Donnenberg, Paula J. Fernandes, Isabel C. A. Scaletsky, Daniel Kalman, Asma Nusrat, Ifor R. Williams
Infection and Immunity Feb 2005, 73 (3) 1441-1451; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1441-1451.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
bacterial toxins
Citrobacter rodentium
colon
Escherichia coli Proteins

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522