Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Molecular Pathogenesis

Involvement of Sortase Anchoring of Cell Wall Proteins in Biofilm Formation by Streptococcus mutans

Céline M. Lévesque, Elena Voronejskaia, Yi-Chen Cathy Huang, Richard W. Mair, Richard P. Ellen, Dennis G. Cvitkovitch
Céline M. Lévesque
Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Voronejskaia
Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi-Chen Cathy Huang
Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard W. Mair
Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard P. Ellen
Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis G. Cvitkovitch
Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dennis.cvitkovitch@utoronto.ca
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3773-3777.2005
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Streptococcus mutans is one of the best-known biofilm-forming organisms associated with humans. We investigated the role of the sortase gene (srtA) in monospecies biofilm formation and observed that inactivation of srtA caused a decrease in biofilm formation. Genes encoding three putative sortase-dependent proteins were also found to be up-regulated in biofilms versus planktonic cells and mutations in these genes resulted in reduced biofilm biomass.

Streptococcus mutans is considered a major causative agent of human dental caries, one of the most common infectious diseases that affect humans (32). This bacterium is also among the oral microorganisms that can cause infective endocarditis (9). Its main cariogenic virulence factors are its abilities to promote adhesion and accumulation on teeth, its acidogenicity, and its aciduricity (2, 6). The adherence of bacteria to dental surfaces is the first step in the development of the complex biofilm community that constitutes dental plaque (6). For S. mutans, adhesion can be mediated by either sucrose-dependent or sucrose-independent mechanisms. In the absence of sucrose, S. mutans expresses several surface adhesins which can bind to salivary components, such as those that form the acquired pellicle on the teeth (22).

In gram-positive bacteria, many surface proteins are covalently linked to the cell wall by a membrane-associated transpeptidase called sortase (24). Proteins for sortase-mediated cell wall anchoring contain several features that are essential for their localization. These features are located at the C terminus of the protein and include an LPXTG motif, followed by a hydrophobic region and a charged tail (7). Using Staphylococcus aureus protein A as a model, many steps in sortase-mediated cell wall anchoring have been elucidated. In a two-step transpeptidation reaction, the sortase cleaves the LPXTG motif between the threonine and glycine residues and the newly liberated carboxy terminus of threonine becomes anchored to cell wall peptidoglycan (21, 23). Bacteria frequently encode more than one sortase, and the number varies among organisms (25). Recently, Comfort and Clubb (4) performed a comparative analysis of 72 sequenced microbial genomes and showed that sortases could be divided into five distinct subfamilies based upon their primary sequences.

S. mutans possesses a single sortase which belongs to the SrtA subfamily (1, 4). The members of the SrtA subfamily are first distinguished by their genomic proximity to the gyrA gene encoding DNA gyrase subunit A. Moreover, genes encoding the SrtA-type enzyme are never proximal to genes encoding potential substrates (4). An analysis of the S. mutans UA159 genome indicates that it encodes six proteins containing the LPXTG motif located at the C terminus and followed by a hydrophobic region and a charged tail: the cell surface protein P1 (also known as antigen I/II, SpaP, and Pac), fructanase (FruA), wall-associated protein A (WapA), wall-associated protein E (WapE), glucan-binding protein C (GbpC), and dextranase (DexA) (1). The significance of sortase in the virulence of several gram-positive pathogens has become apparent in Staphylococcus aureus, Listeria monocytogenes, and Streptococcus gordonii and recently in Streptococcus pneumoniae (25). In S. mutans, a sortase mutant showed a decreased ability to colonize the oral mucosa and the teeth (17).

Many species of oral streptococci are known to form biofilms (14). Among the various streptococcal species, S. mutans is one of the best-known biofilm-forming organisms associated with humans. This bacterium has evolved a biofilm lifestyle for survival and persistence in its natural environment, dental plaque (14). To our knowledge, the role of streptococcal sortases in biofilm formation has never been investigated. In this study, we examined whether the S. mutans sortase is involved in biofilm formation. We also investigated the differential gene expression of the LPXTG-containing proteins of cells growing in biofilms versus their free-living counterparts.

S. mutans wild-type strain UA159 and its mutants were grown in Todd-Hewitt broth supplemented with 0.3% (wt/vol) yeast extract and incubated at 37°C in air with 5% CO2. Genomic DNA was isolated from S. mutans using a Puregene DNA isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN). An S. mutans srtA mutant was constructed by insertion-duplication mutagenesis. An internal 473-bp fragment of srtA was amplified from S. mutans UA159 genomic DNA by using primers CMT-36 (5′-CTGCAGCTGCAGTCCATGCCTTCTTTTGCAC-3′) and CMT-37R (5′-GAATTCGAATTCTTAAGGACCTTTCTGCCTATCC-3′) and cloned into the suicide vector pVA8912 (20). The plasmid, designated pCMT1, was transformed into S. mutans UA159 that had been induced to genetic competence by incubation with competence-stimulating peptide (18). Insertion of pCMT1 in srtA of S. mutans UA159 was confirmed by Southern blot analysis (data not shown). The srtA null mutant was designated CMT044.

To determine if biofilm formation was affected in the CMT044 mutant, we performed a simple biofilm assay. Biofilms were developed in 96-well and 24-well polystyrene microtiter plates. The growth of the biofilm was initiated by inoculating 10 μl of an overnight culture into 300 μl of semidefined minimal medium (19) in the individual wells of a 96-well microtiter plate or by inoculating 50 μl into 1.5 ml of semidefined minimal medium in a 24-well plate. Wells without cells were used as blank controls. The microtiter plates were then incubated at 37°C in air with 5% CO2 for 6 h or 16 h without agitation. After the incubation, the planktonic cells were carefully removed and the plates were air dried overnight. The plates were then stained with 0.01% (wt/vol) safranin for 10 min, rinsed with sterile distilled water, and air dried. Biofilms were quantified by measuring the absorbance of stained biofilms at 490 nm with a microplate reader (model 3550; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). Biofilms formed in 24-well plates were not stained but photographed immediately after the planktonic cells were removed. The results presented in Fig. 1A show that the CMT044 mutant had a noticeable difference in biofilm architecture on the polystyrene surface compared with the wild-type strain. When the total biomass of the CMT044 mutant biofilm was compared with that of the wild-type biofilm, we noticed that the inactivation of srtA caused decreased biofilm mass as illustrated in Fig. 1B. Indeed, mutant CMT044 showed 70.8% ± 2.1% and 75% ± 2.2% decreases in biofilm mass relative to that of the parent strain for 6-h and 16-h biofilms, respectively. The reduction of biofilm mass did not result from a decrease in growth yield, as the CMT044 mutant had the same cell densities as the wild type in a liquid growth kinetics assay (data not shown).

In order to test whether the phenotype was truly the consequence of the srtA knockout, we introduced a functional copy of the srtA gene into the CMT044 mutant. The full-length coding region of srtA, preceded by a potential promoter sequence (TTGTCA-N19-TATCAT), was amplified from UA159 genomic DNA by using primers CMT-46 (5′-GGATCCGGATCCTGAATACCCGACTAAAGGACG-3′) and CMT-47R (5′-GAGCTCGAGCTCTCTCACACCATCACACCAGC-3′) and cloned into pDL277 (16) to generate pCMT3. To confirm that the transformants contained the plasmid of desired size, pCMT3 was reisolated from the complemented mutant by the method of Frère (8). The results presented in Fig. 1 clearly show that a functional srtA gene in trans restored the wild-type phenotype. Introduction of pDL277 alone had no effect (data not shown). However, the results for 6-h biofilms showed that CMT044(pCMT3) had a reduced biomass relative to the parent strain (approximately 60% of the wild-type level) (Fig. 1B). This reduction may have resulted from a decrease in growth yield, since the complemented mutant in liquid culture showed a slower generation time (50.3 ± 2.9 min) compared with that of the parent strain (44.7 ± 0.3 min). Consequently, these results demonstrate that a defect in the S. mutans sortase yields a phenotype that generates a decreased biofilm biomass.

In S. mutans, six LPXTG-containing proteins have been identified (1). Recent studies demonstrated that the S. mutans sortase was involved in the cell wall anchoring of three of them, P1 (11, 17), GbpC (13), and DexA (12). These results suggest that S. mutans cells lacking an active sortase may lose the biological function mediated by theses cell surface proteins. Since the sortase is apparently involved in S. mutans biofilm formation, we investigated the differential gene expression of the six LPXTG-containing proteins in biofilm versus planktonic wild-type cells. For quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments, total RNA was extracted from 16-h-old planktonic and biofilm wild-type cells as described previously (10), with the following modification: 20-μg aliquots of each isolated RNA preparation were treated with 30 U of RQ1 DNase (Promega, Madison, WI). DNA-free RNA samples were subjected to reverse transcription using a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (MBI Fermentas, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) following the manufacturer's protocol. For each RNA sample, the cDNA synthesis reaction was also carried out without reverse transcriptase in order to identify and control for contamination by residual genomic DNA. Single-stranded cDNA synthesized from total RNA was amplified in a QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (QIAGEN) containing HotStarTaq DNA polymerase, deoxynucleoside triphosphates, SYBR Green I, ROX (reference fluorescent dye), and 5 mM MgCl2. PCRs were carried out in a 25-μl volume containing 1× Master Mix, 0.5 μM each primer, and 400 ng of cDNA. Amplification was performed in a Cepheid Smart Cycler system (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) using the following cycling protocol: 15 min of initial denaturation at 95°C, followed by a three-step profile consisting of 30 s of denaturation at 94°C, 30 s of annealing at 58°C, and 30 s of extension at 72°C for a total of 40 cycles. For each set of primers (Table 1), a standard curve was plotted with cycle threshold values obtained from amplification of known quantities of UA159 genomic DNA. The standard curves were used to transfer cycle threshold values of the experimental samples into the relative number of DNA molecules. The quantity of cDNA for each gene was normalized to the quantity of gyrA, a constitutively transcribed control gene whose expression does not vary under the experimental assay conditions used.

The qRT-PCR results presented in Fig. 2 show that three genes encoding LPXTG-containing proteins were significantly expressed at increased levels in the 16-h-old biofilms in comparison to the planktonic phase (P < 0.05). The greatest relative increase was observed for fruA, with mRNA levels increased 4.49-fold in biofilm cells. The fruA gene encodes β-d-fructosidase, an enzyme responsible for the hydrolysis of fructans (3). Fructans are polysaccharides that are commonly synthesized by dental plaque microorganisms (27). Because of their physical properties (large size and viscosity), it is believed that fructans do not diffuse from the dental biofilm and likely serve as energy storage polysaccharides (3). FruA may thus enhance cell survival during periods of nutrient starvation by degrading fructans. For S. mutans, FruA may contribute to the extent and duration of the acid challenge at the tooth surface following sucrose exposure. Although FruA may be considered a potential virulence factor, the loss of FruA in an S. mutans strain evidently does not alter its cariogenic properties in a rat model (33).

The wapA gene was also found to be significantly expressed at an increased level in the biofilm phase (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Levels of wapA mRNA were increased approximately twofold in biofilm-derived cells. The wapA gene encodes wall-associated protein A, a major S. mutans surface protein, also known as AgIII (29). Studies done by Qian and Dao (26) demonstrated that inactivation of S. mutans wapA resulted in a reduction in cell aggregation and adhesion to smooth surfaces. The data suggest that WapA may play a role in the colonization of the tooth surface by S. mutans and consequently, in the buildup of dental biofilms. Sucrose-dependent adhesion of S. mutans within the dental plaque is primarily responsible for establishing its colonization and accumulation on tooth surfaces. However, the contribution of WapA to sucrose-dependent adhesion is still open to interpretation (2).

The third gene whose expression was shown to be significantly increased in biofilm phase was wapE (P < 0.05). Levels of wapE mRNA were increased 1.53-fold in biofilm cells. The wapE gene encodes an uncharacterized secreted protein that is predicted to be wall associated (1). In silico sequence analyses showed that WapE is predicted to have an estimated molecular mass of 55.1 kDa and an isoelectric point of 4.61. BLAST searches of current databases did not reveal significant identity with any other bacterial proteins. However, BLAST searches against the unfinished microbial genomes (http://tigrblast.tigr.org/ufmg/) revealed that an ortholog of this protein was found in the genome of Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 (E value, 2.9e−77). S. sobrinus, a member of the mutans streptococcus group, colonizes the smooth surfaces of teeth and is also recognized as a principal etiological agent responsible for initiating caries in humans (28, 32). As wapE expression is increased in S. mutans biofilm cells, WapE may be involved in the adhesion of this organism to the tooth surface and therefore may play a role in the formation of dental plaque.

Of the genes encoding LPXTG-containing proteins, gbpC was the only one with significantly decreased levels of expression in biofilm cells (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2). Levels of gbpC mRNA were observed to be reduced 2.66-fold in the biofilm phase. The gbpC gene encodes a glucan-binding protein that enables the cells to aggregate in the presence of glucans like dextran (31). It has been hypothesized that proteins capable of binding glucan may contribute to sucrose-dependent adhesion and to the coadhesive nature of the dental plaque biofilm (2). Our results were not anticipated; gbpC expression was actually reduced in the biofilm state. Previous research had found that GbpC promotes dextran-dependent aggregation only when S. mutans cells are stressed by subinhibitory concentration of antibiotics and addition of dextran (30, 31). It is possible that S. mutans is so well adapted to a biofilm environment that gbpC in the biofilm state is regulated as if under low-stress conditions. In contrast, the planktonic cells may encounter transient stress in the oral environment (e.g., presence of antibiotics, carbohydrate limitation, or changes in physical factors) that may induce gbpC expression.

The present study has demonstrated that inactivation of S. mutans srtA caused a decrease in biofilm formation. In addition, we showed that three genes, fruA, wapA, and wapE, were expressed at increased levels in S. mutans biofilm cells, providing evidence that sortase-dependent display of FruA, WapA, and/or WapE may be involved in the formation of biofilms. Therefore, in an effort to determine if these LPXTG-containing proteins are involved in the formation of S. mutans biofilms, we constructed individual mutants and tested their ability to form biofilms. The fruA, wapA, and wapE mutants were constructed by a PCR-based deletion strategy involving restriction-ligation and allelic replacement as described previously (15). Using this technique, the reading frame of the target gene and that of the erythromycin resistance gene (antibiotic selection marker) are aligned, preserving the original downstream reading frames in order to avoid polar effects (15). The primers used to construct and confirm the mutants are listed in Table 2. For example, to construct the fruA mutant, a 968-bp DNA fragment (PCR product A) 5′ from the fruA start codon and a 799-bp DNA fragment (PCR product B) 3′ from the fruA stop codon were amplified from S. mutans UA159 genomic DNA using primer pairs FruA-P1-FruA-P2 and FruA-P3-FruA-P4, respectively. The erythromycin resistance gene (erm) was amplified from a synthetic erythromycin resistance cassette (15) using primers Erm-19 and Erm-20. These PCR products were subjected to restriction digestion and ligation. The ligated fragment (product A-Erm-product B) was then transformed directly into S. mutans UA159 using the competence-stimulating peptide. Following a double-crossover homologous recombination, the internal region of fruA was completely replaced by the erm gene as confirmed by DNA sequencing using primers FruA-P1, FruA-P4, Erm-19, and Erm-20. In order to confirm that the downstream reading frame fruB was not disrupted by the insertion of the erm gene, qRT-PCR was performed using primers FruB-F (5′-CAAGCAGATGCCCAAGTGTC-3′) and FruB-R (5′-TCCTTTTGCCCATTCCAGTG-3′). The qRT-PCR results demonstrated that no significant difference in fruB expression was observed between the wild-type strain and the fruA mutant (data not shown). The wapA and wapE mutants were constructed using the same strategy. As for the fruA mutant, qRT-PCR was performed for the wapA and wapE mutants and compared with the wild-type strain in order to confirm that the insertion of the erm gene did not disrupted the downstream genes SMU.988 (forward, 5′-TCACGTACTTTCCGAATGGAC-3′; reverse, 5′-TCACCCCACATCAATCCTTC-3′) and SMU.1093 (forward, 5′-AGACAAATGGATGCTGGTCC-3′; reverse, 5′-TTGCCTGTGATGTGCCCATC-3′), respectively (data not shown). The fruA, wapA, and wapE mutants were then individually tested for 16-h biofilm formation and quantification as described previously. The results demonstrated that all three mutants formed stable and reproducible biofilms typical of wild-type strain UA159. However, a significant difference in total biofilm biomass was observed compared to that of the wild-type strain. Indeed, the fruA, wapA, and wapE mutants had reduced biofilm biomass of 19.9% ± 2.8%, 24.1% ± 1.5%, and 24.7% ± 0.4% of the wild-type level, respectively (P < 0.05). Consequently, these results demonstrated that these LPXTG-containing proteins are involved in biofilm formation by S. mutans. Moreover, these results suggested that the reduction in biofilm formation in the srtA mutant may be due to a change in the cell wall anchoring of FruA, WapA, and WapE.

Cell surface proteins of gram-positive pathogens play various important roles in pathogenicity. Over the past decade, surface proteins from the oral pathogen S. mutans have been studied for their role in oral colonization, as well as their potential as vaccine targets (28). The LPXTG-containing proteins are the only surface proteins known to be covalently linked to the bacterial cell wall (5). In S. mutans, LPXTG-containing proteins FruA, WapA, and WapE are involved in biofilm formation. Therefore, these proteins are of great interest in terms of understanding the S. mutans infection process and could become future targets for the prevention of dental caries.

  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

S. mutans biofilm formation. (A) Photograph of typical 16-h-biofilms grown in a 24-well polystyrene microtiter plate. The parent UA159 and its SrtA-deficient mutant grow into biofilms of different architectures. Introduction of a functional copy of the srtA gene into the CMT044 mutant restores the wild-type phenotype. (B) Quantification of biofilm mass by optical density of UA159, CMT044, and CMT044(pCMT3) biofilms. Mean optical densities at 490 nm (OD490) ± standard errors are shown. Results represent the average of three independent experiments.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Gene expression of SrtA and the LPXTG-containing proteins in planktonic and biofilm wild-type cells. (A) RNA level relative to the level of gyrA. The means ± standard errors of three different experiments are shown. (B) Differential gene expression in biofilm growth versus planktonic cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Primer sequences for genes whose expression in biofilm and planktonic cultures was compareda

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Primers used to construct the fruA, wapA, and wapE mutants by PCR restriction-ligation mutagenesisa

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research grant DE013230 and by Canadian Institutes of Health Research operating grant MT-15431. D.G.C. is supported by a Canada Research Chair.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 25 October 2004.
    • Returned for modification 4 January 2005.
    • Accepted 8 February 2005.
  • Editor: V. J. DiRita

  • American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Ajdic, D., W. M. McShan, R. E. McLaughlin, G. Savic, J. Chang, M. B. Carson, C. Primeaux, R. Tian, S. Kenton, H. Jia, S. Lin, Y. Qian, S. Li, H. Zhu, F. Najar, H. Lai, J. White, B. A. Roe, and J. J. Ferretti. 2002. Genome sequence of Streptococcus mutans UA159, a cariogenic dental pathogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:14434-14439.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Banas, J. A. 2004. Virulence properties of Streptococcus mutans. Front. Biosci. 9:1267-1277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. ↵
    Burne, R. A., K. Schilling, W. H. Bowen, and R. E. Yasbin. 1987. Expression, purification, and characterization of an exo-β-d-fructosidase of Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 169:4507-4517.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Comfort, D., and R. T. Clubb. 2004. A comparative genome analysis identifies distinct sorting pathways in gram-positive bacteria. Infect. Immun. 72:2710-2722.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Cossart, P., and R. Jonquières. 2000. Sortase, a universal target for therapeutic agents against gram-positive bacteria? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5013-5015.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Cvitkovitch, D. G., Y.-H. Li, and R. P. Ellen. 2003. Quorum sensing and biofilm formation in streptococcal infections. J. Clin. Investig. 112:1626-1632.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. ↵
    Fischetti, V. A., V. Pancholi, and O. Schneewind. 1990. Conservation of a hexapeptide sequence in the anchor region of surface proteins from gram-positive cocci. Mol. Microbiol. 4:1603-1605.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. ↵
    Frère, J. 1994. Simple method for extracting plasmid DNA from lactic acid bacteria. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 18:227-229.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Gendron, R., D. Grenier, and L.-F. Maheu-Robert. 2000. The oral cavity as a reservoir of bacterial pathogens for focal infections. Microbes Infect. 2:897-906.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Hanna, M. N., R. J. Ferguson, Y.-H. Li, and D. G. Cvitkovitch. 2001. uvrA is an acid-inducible gene involved in the adaptive response to low pH in Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 183:5964-5973.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Igarashi, T., E. Asaga, and N. Goto. 2003. The sortase of Streptococcus mutans mediates cell wall anchoring of a surface protein antigen. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 18:266-269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Igarashi, T., E. Asaga, and N. Goto. 2004. Roles of Streptococcus mutans dextranase anchored to the cell wall by sortase. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 19:102-105.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Igarashi, T., E. Asaga, Y. Sato, and N. Goto. 2004. Inactivation of srtA gene of Streptococcus mutans inhibits dextran-dependent aggregation by glucan-binding protein C. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 19:57-60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Kolenbrander, P. E. 2000. Oral microbial communities: biofilms, interactions, and genetic systems. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54:413-437.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. ↵
    Lau, P. C. Y., C. K. Sung, J. H. Lee, D. A. Morrison, and D. G. Cvitkovitch. 2002. PCR ligation mutagenesis in transformable streptococci: application and efficiency. J. Microbiol. Methods 49:193-205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. ↵
    Leblanc, D. J., L. N. Lee, and A. Abu-Al-Jaibat. 1992. Molecular, genetic, and functional analysis of the basic replicon of pVA380-1, a plasmid of oral streptococcal origin. Plasmid 28:130-145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. ↵
    Lee, S. F., and T. L. Boran. 2003. Roles of sortase in surface expression of the major protein adhesin P1, saliva-induced aggregation and adherence, and cariogenicity of Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun. 71:676-681.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Li, Y.-H., P. C. Y. Lau, J. H. Lee, R. P. Ellen, and D. G. Cvitkovitch. 2001. Natural genetic transformation of Streptococcus mutans growing in biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 183:897-908.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Li, Y.-H., N. Tang, M. B. Aspiras, P. C. Y. Lau, J. H. Lee, R. P. Ellen, and D. G. Cvitkovitch. 2002. A quorum-sensing signaling system essential for genetic competence in Streptococcus mutans is involved in biofilm formation. J. Bacteriol. 184:2699-2708.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Malke, H., U. Mechold, K. Gase, and D. Gerlach. 1994. Inactivation of the streptokinase gene prevents Streptococcus equisimilis H46A from acquiring cell-associated plasmin activity in the presence of plasminogen. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 116:107-112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Mazmanian, S. K., G. Liu, H. Ton-That, and O. Schneewind. 1999. Staphylococcus aureus sortase, an enzyme that anchors surface proteins to the cell wall. Science 285:760-763.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Mitchell, T. J. 2003. The pathogenesis of streptococcal infections: from tooth decay to meningitis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 1:219-230.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. ↵
    Navarre, W. W., and O. Schneewind. 1994. Proteolytic cleavage and cell wall anchoring at the LPXTG motif of surface proteins in gram-positive bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 14:115-121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Navarre, W. W., and O. Schneewind. 1999. Surface proteins of gram-positive bacteria and mechanisms of their targeting to the cell wall envelope. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:174-229.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Paterson, G. K., and T. J. Mitchell. 2004. The biology of gram-positive sortase enzymes. Trends Microbiol. 12:89-95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. ↵
    Qian, H., and M. L. Dao. 1993. Inactivation of the Streptococcus mutans wall-associated protein A gene (wapA) results in a decrease in sucrose-dependent adherence and aggregation. Infect. Immun. 61:5021-5028.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Rozen, R., G. Bachrach, I. Gedalia, and D. Steinberg. 2001. The role of fructans on dental biofilm formation by Streptococcus sobrinus, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus gordonii and Actinomyces viscosus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 195:205-210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. ↵
    Russell, M. W., N. K. Childers, S. M. Michalek, D. J. Smith, and M. A. Taubman. 2004. A caries vaccine? Caries Res. 38:230-235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Russell, M. W., D. J. Harrington, and R. R. B. Russell. 1995. Identity of Streptococcus mutans surface protein antigen III and wall-associated protein antigen A. Infect. Immun. 63:733-735.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Sato, Y., H. Senpuku, K. Okamoto, N. Hanada, and H. Kizaki. 2002. Streptococcus mutans binding to solid phase dextran mediated by the glucan-binding protein C. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 17:252-256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. ↵
    Sato, Y., Y. Yamamoto, and H. Kizaki. 1997. Cloning and sequence analysis of the gbpC gene encoding a novel glucan-binding protein of Streptococcus mutans. Infect. Immun. 65:668-675.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    van Houte, J. 1994. Role of micro-organisms in caries etiology. J. Dent. Res. 73:672-681.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. ↵
    Wexler, D. L., J. E. C. Penders, W. H. Bowen, and R. A. Burne. 1992. Characteristics and cariogenicity of a fructanase-defective Streptococcus mutans strain. Infect. Immun. 60:3673-3681.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Involvement of Sortase Anchoring of Cell Wall Proteins in Biofilm Formation by Streptococcus mutans
Céline M. Lévesque, Elena Voronejskaia, Yi-Chen Cathy Huang, Richard W. Mair, Richard P. Ellen, Dennis G. Cvitkovitch
Infection and Immunity May 2005, 73 (6) 3773-3777; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3773-3777.2005

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Involvement of Sortase Anchoring of Cell Wall Proteins in Biofilm Formation by Streptococcus mutans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
Share
Involvement of Sortase Anchoring of Cell Wall Proteins in Biofilm Formation by Streptococcus mutans
Céline M. Lévesque, Elena Voronejskaia, Yi-Chen Cathy Huang, Richard W. Mair, Richard P. Ellen, Dennis G. Cvitkovitch
Infection and Immunity May 2005, 73 (6) 3773-3777; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3773-3777.2005
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522