Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Cellular Microbiology: Pathogen-Host Cell Molecular Interactions

Host-Derived Pentapeptide Affecting Adhesion, Proliferation, and Local pH in Biofilm Communities Composed of Streptococcus and Actinomyces Species

Mirva  Drobni, Tong Li, Carina Krüger, Vuokko Loimaranta, Mogens Kilian, Lennart Hammarström, Hans Jörnvall, Tomas Bergman, Nicklas Strömberg
Mirva  Drobni
1Department of Odontology/Cariology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tong Li
1Department of Odontology/Cariology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carina Krüger
2Division of Clinical Immunology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vuokko Loimaranta
1Department of Odontology/Cariology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mogens Kilian
3Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Aarhus University, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lennart Hammarström
2Division of Clinical Immunology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans Jörnvall
4Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomas Bergman
4Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicklas Strömberg
1Department of Odontology/Cariology, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Nicklas.Stromberg@odont.umu.se
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00068-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Salivary proline-rich proteins (PRPs) attach commensal Actinomyces and Streptococcus species to teeth. Here, gel filtration, mass spectrometry and Edman degradation were applied to show the release of a pentapeptide, RGRPQ, from PRP-1 upon proteolysis by Streptococcus gordonii. Moreover, synthetic RGRPQ and derivatives were used to investigate associated innate properties and responsible motifs. The RGRPQ peptide increased 2.5-fold the growth rate of S. gordonii via a Q-dependent sequence motif and selectively stimulated oral colonization of this organism in a rat model in vivo. In contrast, the growth of Streptococcus mutans, implicated in caries, was not affected. While the entire RGRPQ sequence was required to block sucrose-induced pH-decrease by S. gordonii and S. mutans, the N-terminal Arg residue mediated the pH increase (i.e., ammonia production) by S. gordonii alone (which exhibits Arg catabolism to ammonia). Strains of commensal viridans streptococci exhibited PRP degradation and Arg catabolism, whereas cariogenic species did not. The RGRPQ peptide mediated via a differential Q-dependent sequence motif, adhesion inhibition, and desorption of PRP-1-binding strains of A. naeslundii genospecies 2 (5 of 10 strains) but not of S. gordonii (n = 5). The inhibitable A. naeslundii strains alone displayed the same binding profile as S. gordonii to hybrid peptides terminating in RGRPQ or GQSPQ, derived from the middle or C-terminal segments of PRP-1. The present findings indicate the presence of a host-bacterium interaction in which a host peptide released by bacterial proteolysis affects key properties in biofilm formation.

The resident polymicrobial flora of commensal or symbiotic bacteria constitutes a powerful innate defense (11, 12). Whereas infection by only 10 Salmonella organisms can be lethal to germfree mice, as many as 5 × 106 organisms are needed to kill mice with a normal intestinal microflora. However, apart from adhesion and pH-related proliferation, little is known about the host factors that govern the early colonization of commensal bacteria, as well as the microbial hierarchy of biofilm formation.

The human saliva innate defense involves an array of (poly)peptides, glycoproteins, and mucins, e.g., histatins (37, 38), proline-rich proteins (PRPs) (3, 22), scavenger gp-340 (14, 39), and MUC7 (6, 34), to control colonization and infections (7, 30). Acidic PRPs, which are polymorphic and multifunctional proteins (3, 22, 30), exhibit a C-terminal PQ dipeptide for bacterial binding (17, 18) and specific regions for interactions with dietary tannins (polyphenols) or calcium. Among a multiplicity of salivary receptors (16, 40), acidic PRPs attach early colonizing oral commensal viridans-type Streptococcus and Actinomyces species to teeth (20, 23) and contribute to a microbial ecology that accommodates tooth protective streptococci, such as Streptococcus gordonii (4, 43). Accordingly, whereas the prevalent allelic variants of acidic PRPs (e.g., PRP-1) coincide with caries resistance and adhesion of commensal bacteria, the less prevalent Db variant coincides with caries susceptibility and the adhesion of Streptococcus mutans (41), a caries-associated organism capable of producing high levels of acids from sucrose. In addition, small PRP-derived peptides are abundant in saliva and coincide also with caries-prone or -resistant subjects (2).

The oral commensal flora is partly composed of bacterial communities of viridans-type members of the genus Streptococcus (e.g., the early colonizing S. gordonii) and of members of the genus Actinomyces (e.g., A. naeslundii) (13, 27). Accordingly, S. gordonii and A. naeslundii may compete for PRP-1 adhesion sites, as well as nutrients. A neutral local plaque pH is of crucial importance to microbial ecology and health (9). Acid production from sucrose (pH decrease) promotes the growth of highly acidogenic and aciduric streptococci, such as S. mutans, and thereby development of caries. The catabolism of arginine to ammonia has therefore been suggested as a strategy adopted by oral commensal streptococci to maintain a neutral local pH at which they grow optimally (10).

Gram-positive bacteria, such as streptococci and staphylococci, use linear or cyclic peptides as signals in cell-to-cell communication (15, 31), e.g., the octapeptide pheromone regulating staphylococcal density and virulence (24). In the S. gordonii strain Challis of oral tissue origin, genes encoding peptide pheromone receptors are present (21). Recently, we showed that oral streptococci and actinomycetes proteolytically cleave PRP-1 and that S. gordonii strain SK12 produces two large fragments and a postulated RGRPQ peptide (32). Synthetic RGRPQ was found to desorb bound bacteria and to block a sucrose-induced pH decrease in dental plaque in situ (32). However, little is known about the functional role(s) of this and other salivary peptides in regulating biofilm formation or innate protection.

The aim of the present study was to investigate innate roles and determinants of the RGRPQ peptide in commensal biofilm formation and caries protection, as well as to chemically verify the release of the RGRPQ peptide from the PRP-1 polypeptide. The RGRPQ peptide influenced bacterial proliferation in vitro and in vivo, as well as adhesion and local pH in vitro. The present study shows an example of a host-bacterium interaction that results in the release of a peptide affecting three key components of biofilm formation: proliferation, adhesion, and local pH.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains. Streptococcus and Actinomyces strains were of defined origin (20, 27, 33) and grown overnight on Columbia-II-agar base plates (Becton Dickinson and Company, Cockeysville, MD), supplemented with 30 ml of a human erythrocyte suspension per liter, at 37°C in an atmosphere with 5% CO2. Strains intended for hydroxyapatite adhesion tests were metabolically labeled by adding [35S]methionine to the growth medium (33).

Peptides.The peptides RGRPQ, AGAPQ, AARPQ, GGRPQ, RGAPQ, RGRAA, RGRPA, RGRAQ, KAKVN, GQSPQ, and GRPQG were synthesized, purified by using high-pressure liquid chromatography, and characterized by mass spectrometry (Biomolecular Resource Facility, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden). AGRPQ was not possible to synthesize. ProGln (PQ) was from BACHEM AG, Switzerland, and the other peptides were from Sigma Genosys, United Kingdom. Hybrid peptides DzzEEKFLRRIGRFGPRGRPQ (z means l-phosphoserine) and DzzEEKFLRRIGRFGPGQSPQ were synthesized, purified by using high-pressure liquid chromatography, and characterized by mass spectrometry (Mimotopes Pty Ltd., Clayton, Victoria, Australia). The peptides were dissolved in sterile water, the pH was adjusted to 6.8 to 7.0, and aliquots were frozen at −20°C. The RGRPQ peptide for in vivo testing was from Thermo Electron GmbH, Germany.

Proliferation.Bacterial cells were cultured consecutively in a chemically defined medium (44) at 37°C in an atmosphere with 5% CO2. The second culture, used as an inoculum (1%, 1/100 μl [inoculum/medium]), was grown for 14 h. The inoculum (an A550 of 0.03 corresponding to 8 × 107 cells/ml) was added to a minimal growth medium (supplemented with peptide or control) obtained by dilution of the chemically defined medium (with all 20 naturally occurring free amino acids) eight times and filter sterilization in sterile 96-well microtiter plates (Millipore). The wells were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Bacterial numbers were recorded every hour by measuring the absorbance at 550 nm (A550) using a Spectra MAX 340 spectrometer (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). The absorbance values which were used to calculate the generation time, were linearly proportional to the number of bacteria measured by viable counting.

pH increase (ammonia production).An overnight bacterial culture was washed once in 10 ml of sterile water, adjusted to 4.8 × 109 cells/ml with water, and kept on ice for a minimum of 30 min before use (46). The bacterial cell suspension (90 μl) was mixed with test peptide and sterile water to a final volume of 100 μl and a final peptide concentration of 0.5 mM. The test and control suspensions were incubated at 37°C aerobically, and the pH was measured every 30 min for the 330-min test period by using a pH electrode.

Sucrose-induced pH decrease (acid production).To measure bacterial metabolic responses to peptides in the presence of sucrose, bacteria were grown on agar plates, harvested, and washed once in 10 ml of starvation solution [20 mM 2-amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol-HCl, 35 mM NaCl, 62 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO4, 1 mM K2HPO4 (pH 7.0)]. After centrifugation, the cell pellet was suspended in 10 ml of the same solution, followed by incubation at 37°C for 1 h in an atmosphere with 5% CO2 for starvation (42). Pelleted bacteria were resuspended in KCl solution (50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2 · 6H2O) to 2 × 109 cells/ml and kept on ice until use. Bacterial cells (45 μl) were mixed with the test peptide, and KCl solution was added to give a final volume of 97 μl at a final peptide concentration of 2 mM (S. gordonii SK12) or 5 mM (S. mutans Ingbritt). The pH was measured immediately as the starting pH (0 min). Sucrose solution (3 μl, 1 M) was added to each well, the mixtures and a control cell suspension were incubated at 37°C aerobically, and the pH was measured every 10 min during the initial 30-0min test period and every 30 min during the subsequent 120-min test period by using a pH electrode.

Adhesion and adhesion inhibition.The adhesion of 35S-labeled bacteria to hybrid peptides (19) coated onto hydroxyapatite beads was measured essentially as described previously (5-mg beads, 5 × 108 cells/ml, and 1 h of adhesion) (33). Adhesion to PRP-1 for the adhesion inhibition experiments was performed similarly except for the use of 8-mg beads, 2 × 108 cells/ml, and 30 min of adhesion. Inhibition of adhesion was done by preincubation of cells with peptides for 20 min at room temperature prior to the adhesion assay.

Desorption (reversal of aggregates of bacteria and PRP-1-beads).Aggregation of bacteria by PRP-1-coated latex beads was carried out as described previously (32), except for the use of bacterial suspensions of 6 × 109 cells/ml. Bovine serum albumin-coated latex beads served as a control. Desorption of strain T14V bound to PRP-1-coated beads was measured by adding peptide (5.06 mM) to preformed aggregates of bacteria and PRP-1-beads and visual scoring of the aggregates after 1 min of incubation at scores from 0 to 5 (5, no visible aggregates; 4, small aggregates in unclear solution; 3, moderate aggregates in unclear solution; 2, moderate aggregates in clear solution; 1, large aggregates in clear solution; and 0, clumping of aggregates in clear solution). Aggregation of bacteria by PRP-1-coated beads in the absence or presence of RGRPQ peptide used the same scoring but in the reversed order (e.g., 0 marks no visible aggregates and 5 indicates clumping of aggregates in clear solution; see Fig. 4A).

Identification of RGRPQ released by bacterial proteolysis of the PRP-1 polypeptide. S. gordonii SK12 was cultured on agar plates and incubated in starvation solution at 37°C for 1 h in 5% CO2. After centrifugation, pelleted cells (2 × 109 cells/ml, 75 μl) were incubated with PRP-1 (5 mg/ml) in M-DIL buffer (0.43% NaCl, 0.042% KCl, 0.1% Na2HPO4, 0.1% KH2PO4, 1% glycerophosphate disodium salt, 0.024% CaCl2, 0.01% MgCl2 · H2O) for 2 h. After centrifugation, the supernatant (200 μl) was subjected to gel filtration (Superdex-peptide-column HR 10/30; Pharmacia) in 20 mM Tris-HCl-500 mM NaCl (pH 8.0). The flow rate was 0.5 ml/min, and the absorbance was monitored at 214 nm. Purified PRP-1 (50 μg) and synthetic RGRPQ peptide (100 mM, 5 μl) were run in parallel as reference substances.

Mass spectrometry and Edman degradation.Nano-electrospray mass spectrometry was carried out with a Q-Tof instrument (Micromass/Waters) operated as described previously (25) and Edman degradation with a Procise Ht sequencer instrument (Applied Biosystems) operated according to the manufacturer's recommendations. For mass spectrometry, 1 to 2 μl of the peptide fraction (500 μl) was used without prior desalting and mixed with an equal volume of spraying solvent (60% acetonitrile containing 1% acetic acid). For N-terminal sequence analysis, 60 μl of the fraction was applied to a Biobrene precycled glass fiber filter disc.

PRP degradation.PRP degradation was measured essentially as described previously (32). Briefly, PRP-1 (0.2 mg/ml) was coincubated with bacteria (2 × 109 cells/ml) at 37°C for 20 h, followed by native alkaline polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The degree of cleavage was scored from 0 to 5 by densitometry (0 = 0 to 10% [negative activity], 1 = 10 to 20% [low activity], 2 = 20 to 40% and 3 = 40 to 60% [moderate activity], 4 = 60 to 80%, and 5 = 80 to 100% [high activity] loss of acidic PRP-1).

In vivo rat model.Sprague-Dawley rats (Møllegard Breeding Laboratories, Ejby, Denmark), 21 days old, were desalivated at day 1 by surgery as described previously (8). The rats were desalivated at day 1 and infected at days 2 and 3 by swabbing the oral cavity after dipping the swab in a bacterial suspension of S. gordonii SK12 and S. mutans NG8 (2 × 109 and 1 × 109cells, respectively) supplemented with peptide (5 mg/ml) or control. Each animal was given orally RGRPQ peptide (4 mg/day) or sterile water four times daily (4 × 100 μl, 10 mg of peptide/ml) from days 4 to 21. At day 9, all rats were reinfected with S. gordonii with peptide (5 mg/ml) or control. The animals received a ground diet supplemented with 56% sucrose and sterile-distilled water. The rats were screened for bacterial growth at days 4, 11, 18, and 21 by using oral swabs, and subsequent dilutions plated on MS (S. gordonii) and MSB (S. mutans) agar plates were used to establish the bacterial numbers (CFU). All animal experiments were approved by the local ethical committee of the Karolinska Institutet at Huddinge University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.

Statistics.Data are summarized as means and standard errors of the mean (SEM) or as median values. Unpaired t tests are used for two-group comparisons of peptide measurements referred to in results. For the analyses of the measurements of CFU displayed in Fig. 3, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for comparisons between pairs of groups at each time point. For an overall comparison between groups, a derived variable of the total number of CFU across the different time points within each rat is used. All tests are two-sided, and the significance level was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Proteolytic release of RGRPQ from the PRP-1 polypeptide.Release of the RGRPQ peptide from the PRP-1 polypeptide after proteolysis by S. gordonii SK12 was shown in three modes. First, a peptide component eluted in the same position as synthetic RGRPQ upon gel filtration of the proteolysis products (Fig. 1A). Second, the purified peptide revealed the monoisotopic mass 613.46 Da, which corresponds to the singly protonated RGRPQ peptide (Fig. 1B). Third, its sequence, RGRPQ, was demonstrated by Edman degradation (Fig. 1C).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Identification of a pentapeptide, RGRPQ, derived from proteolysis of PRP-1 by S. gordonii SK12. (A) Isolation of the RGRPQ peptide (marked) by gel filtration of the PRP-1 proteolysis mixture. Synthetic RGRPQ was used as a reference to localize the RGRPQ peptide. (B) Nano-electrospray mass spectrometry of the RGRPQ peptide recovered from gel filtration reveals the expected monoisotopic mass 613.46 Da. (C) Edman degradation of the fraction from gel filtration reveals the sequence RGRPQ.

Stimulation of proliferation of S. gordonii in vitro by RGRPQ and related peptides.We investigated the ability of RGRPQ and Ala substituted peptides to stimulate the growth rate or proliferation of S. gordonii in a minimum growth medium containing free amino acids (1:20 peptide versus free amino acids) (Table 1 and Fig. 2A). A 2.5-fold-increased growth rate occurred for S. gordonii at 150 μM RGRPQ compared to the minimum growth medium (the generation time was reduced from 4.65 to 1.85 h), whereas S. mutans was not affected (data not shown). The growth rate effect by RGRPQ on S. gordonii was dose dependent at peptide concentrations between 25 and 250 μM and optimal at 150 μM.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Illustration of RGRPQ innate properties and tentative motifs responsible for each property. (A) Effect of RGRPQ derivatives on the growth of S. gordonii SK12 when cultured in a minimum growth medium in the presence or absence (control) of peptide. The bacterial cell numbers were estimated from measuring the A550 of the cell culture. The mean absorbance values and the SEM from one experimental run with triplicate determinations are shown. (B) Effect of RGRPQ derivatives on the adhesion (percent binding bacteria out of total added) of A. naeslundii T14V to PRP-1-coated hydroxyapatite beads. (C) RGRPQ innate properties and tentative RGRPQ motifs for each property. Lines indicate each tentative motif with suggested key determinants marked by a broadened boldface line. The proliferation XXXQ motif is marked by a dotted line to emphasize its unique nature compared to the XXXQ adhesion motif. The potential AT hook marks the GRP motif present in some transcriptional factors.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Influence of RGRPQ-related peptides on growth and NH3 production (S. gordonii), acid production (S. mutans), and adhesion inhibition/desorption (A. naeslundii)

Pentapeptides ending in a Q residue increased the growth rate efficiently, whereas those without a C-terminal Q residue did not (mean A550 of 0.060 versus 0.043, P < 0.0001). Ala substitutions (i.e., RARPQ and AARPQ), but not a glycine substitution (i.e., GGRPQ), located in the N-terminal segment reduced the activity, suggesting an extended and C-terminal Q motif (e.g., XXXQ). Moreover, PRP-1-derived peptide sequences with a terminal or internal Q terminus, such as GQSPQ (C terminus) and PQGPPQ (repetitive segment) or GRPQG (internal segment), also stimulated the proliferation of S. gordonii effectively (Table 1).

Stimulation of proliferation of S. gordonii in vivo by the RGRPQ peptide.The ability of the RGRPQ peptide to selectively stimulate oral colonization of S. gordonii in vivo was evaluated by using a rat colonization model (Fig. 3). Rats were coinoculated orally with S. gordonii SK12 and S. mutans NG8 and orally administrated peptide (4 mg/day, n = 14 rats) or placebo (sterile water, n = 14 rats). The RGRPQ peptide, but not placebo, promoted strong selective colonization of S. gordonii in vivo, whereas S. gordonii in the absence of peptide was strongly suppressed under the favorable conditions provided for S. mutans by the desalivation and 56% sucrose diet. The Wilcoxon rank-sum P values between RGRPQ peptide and placebo were P = 0.0001 at day 4 and P = 0.0006 for day 11 and P = 0.0003 for the total counts summed across time points.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

(A and B) Promotion of colonization of S. gordonii SK12 (A), but not of S. mutans NG8 (B), by oral administration of RGRPQ peptide (○) compared to control (sterile water ▪) in a rat model. Rats (n = 14 peptide group, n = 14 control group) were coinfected with S. gordonii SK12 and S. mutans NG8 at the start of the study (day 0). Bacterial numbers (in CFU) are presented as means of the 14 animals in each group, and bars show the SEM. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences at given time points (***, P < 0.001) based on comparisons between pairs of groups at each time point using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Also shown in panel A are the median and the individual S. gordonii CFU values for the RGRPQ-treated rats at the 4- and 11-day time points.

Effects on local pH by the RGRPQ peptide.We next investigated potential mechanisms for the ability of the RGRPQ peptide to block a sucrose-induced pH decrease in oral biofilms in situ (32) (Table 1). When added to S. gordonii SK12 (which exhibits the catabolism of arginine to ammonia), peptides with an N-terminal arginine increased the pH, whereas peptides without this characteristic did not (mean pH 7.28 versus 6.35, P < 0.0001). Moreover, peptides with Ala substitutions located in the C-terminal segment or at the internal Arg residue affected the pH marginally, if at all, suggesting the N-terminal Arg as the responsible motif for ammonia production. In contrast, incubation of peptides with S. mutans Ingbritt (which lacks catabolism of arginine) did not increase the pH (data not shown). Moreover, the RGRPQ peptide blocked pH decrease (an indirect measure of acid production) in both S. mutans Ingbritt and S. gordonii SK12 after challenge with sucrose (Table 1). Other peptide sequences displayed markedly lower blockage of acid production compared to RGRPQ for S. mutans (mean pH 5.1 versus 6.1, P = 0.0145) and for S. gordonii (mean pH 5.6 versus 6.3, P = 0.0387). Thus, the ability of the full-length RGRPQ peptide to block a sucrose-induced pH decrease in oral biofilms in situ may be a function of both ammonia production and the blockage of acid production by viridans streptococci.

PRP degradation and ammonia production are typical properties of commensal viridans streptococci.A panel of oral Streptococcus species of defined arginine catabolism and cariogenic properties (13) was tested for their ability to cleave PRP-1 (and the potential release of RGRPQ) by incubation with PRP-1 and native alkaline gel electrophoresis (Table 2). A high degree and frequency of PRP-1 proteolysis occurred among strains of strictly commensal streptococci (e.g., S. gordonii and S. sanguinis) with arginine catabolism and low acidogenicity, whereas the opposite was observed for highly (e.g., S. mutans) and potentially (e.g., S. mitis) cariogenic streptococci without arginine catabolism but with high acid production (Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Proteolysis of PRP-1 by commensal and cariogenic streptococci

Adhesion inhibition and desorption of A. naeslundii T14V by the RGRPQ peptide.We tested RGRPQ and structural analogues thereof for their ability to inhibit the adhesion of A. naeslundii T14V to PRP-1 coated onto hydroxyapatite beads, and to detach this strain from PRP-1-coated latex beads (Table 1 and Fig. 2B). High-to-moderate inhibitory or desorbing activity occurred with peptides ending in a Q residue, whereas peptides without a Q residue had virtually no activity (mean inhibition of 54% versus 11%, P < 0.0001, mean desorption of 2.6 versus 0.3, P < 0.0001). In addition to Ala substitutions at the C-terminal Q residue, substitution of the P or G residues (RGRAQ and RARPQ/AARPQ, respectively) reduced the inhibitory activity. Moreover, the previously delineated dipeptide PQ lacked inhibitory and desorbing activity (data not shown), and the GGRPQ peptide showed equal activity to RGRPQ. Thus, an XXXQ adhesion motif with a dependence on both glycine and proline (i.e., GXPQ) may be at work.

Actinomyces strains using the same PRP-1 binding sites as S. gordonii are inhibited by RGRPQ.Oral commensal (e.g., S. gordonii and A. naeslundii), as well as pathogenic, bacteria may compete for PRP-1 binding sites. We therefore investigated the ability of the RGRPQ peptide to selectively inhibit the adhesion of a panel of A. naeslundii genospecies 2 (n = 10) and S. gordonii (n = 5) strains (including strain SK12) with avid binding to PRP-1 coated onto hydroxyapatite beads. The RGRPQ peptide blocked the adhesion of half of the A. naeslundii strains (n = 5), but none of the S. gordonii strain (Fig. 4). We next used hybrid peptides terminating in PRP-1 epitopes (RGRPQ and the C-terminal GQSPQ) to delineate potential PRP-1-binding sites for A. naeslundii T14V (inhibitable by RGRPQ), A. naeslundii LY7 (noninhibitable by RGRPQ), and S. gordonii Blackburn (noninhibitable by RGRPQ) (Fig. 4). Whereas the inhibitable A. naeslundii T14V and S. gordonii Blackburn bound avidly to both peptides, A. naeslundii LY7 showed avid binding only to the GQSPQ peptide. Thus, the RGRPQ peptide selectively inhibits Actinomyces strains that use the same PRP-1 binding sites as S. gordonii, which may differ by having a low-affinity binding mode insensitive to free peptides.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

(A) Selective inhibition of the adhesion of certain A. naeslundii genospecies 2 strains by the RGRPQ peptide. Adhesion was determined by measuring the aggregation of the bacteria with PRP-1-coated latex beads in the presence (+RGRPQ) or absence (−RGRPQ) of peptide. Score 5 indicates clumping of aggregates in clear solution, and score 0 indicates no aggregates (see Materials and Methods). (B and C) Adhesion of A. naeslundii and S. gordonii strains to hybrid peptides with a RGRPQ or GQSPQ terminus. Adhesion (percent binding bacteria of total added bacteria) of 35S-labeled A. naeslundii strains T14V and LY7 and S. gordonii Blackburn to a hybrid/RGRPQ peptide (B) or a hybrid/GQSPQ peptide (C) coated onto hydroxyapatite beads. The hybrid peptides are designed with the calcium binding 15-amino-acid N-terminal segment of statherin and a proline residue followed by RGRPQ or GQSPQ, derived from the middle or C-terminal segments of PRP-1, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The present study shows an example of host-microbe symbiosis or commensalism in which S. gordonii, an early colonizing oral commensal bacterium, uses proteolysis of salivary PRP-1 to generate a pentapeptide, RGRPQ, which affects key components of biofilm formation (i.e., adhesion, proliferation, and local pH). The RGRPQ peptide stimulates the proliferation of S. gordonii and stabilizes a neutral pH for optimal growth of this organism; it also desorbs competing Actinomyces bacteria from PRP-1. This suggests the RGRPQ peptide as a host-derived factor guiding the microbial hierarchy of oral biofilm formation and potentially as a prebiotic molecule. Moreover, the stimulation of S. gordonii colonization in rats by the RGRPQ peptide suggests effects on biofilm formation in vivo. Such effects could be beneficial to oral ecology or point to applications to support the implantation of S. gordonii to interfere with cariogenic microorganisms (28, 45) or to apply vaccinations with S. gordonii vectors (35). Other small peptide candidates to combat infectious diseases are the tripeptide inhibiting streptococcal infections in vivo (5), the P1025 peptide inhibiting S. mutans adhesion and colonization (26), and the antifungal peptides derived from histatins or MUC7 (6, 36).

The present findings also suggest specific RGRPQ motifs involved in affecting adhesion, proliferation, or pH (Fig. 2C). Whereas the blockage of a sucrose-induced pH-decrease in S. gordonii and S. mutans required the entire RGRPQ sequence, proliferation by S. gordonii and adhesion inhibition of Actinomyces seemed to involve differential XXXQ motifs with highly crucial Q residues. Their differential natures are illustrated by the fact that proliferation allowed both an internal Q residue and broader sequence variations. Although the G and P residues of the RGRPQ peptide may play direct or indirect roles in bacterial binding, a more powerful SMD and QSAR approach is necessary to resolve how amino acids 2 to 4 (i.e., GRP segment) contribute to activity. In contrast, the production of ammonia—as inferred from a pH increase in strains with Arg catabolism—seemed to depend on the simple R residue at the N terminus. Hypothetically, the RGRPQ peptide may inhibit sugar metabolism (sucrose-induced pH decrease) in S. gordonii and S. mutans through general mechanisms, whereas proliferation, adhesion, and a pH increase may involve species-specific receptors or characteristics (e.g., Arg catabolism). Although further studies are required to explore the modes of action of the RGRPQ peptide, it is noteworthy that ERGMT and ARNQT pentapeptides are part of a signaling system in Bacillus subtilis that uses unspecific oligopeptide permeases and intra- or extracellular receptors to affect gene expression. Although the S. gordonii strain Challis contains genes for peptide signaling (21) and the GRP segment of the RGRPQ peptide is an AT-hook motif found in some transcriptional factors (1), further studies are required to explore the possibility of the RGRPQ peptide mimicking natural peptide signals between oral viridans streptococci. If so, the RGRPQ peptide could induce a more rapid growing bacterial phenotype. However, it cannot be excluded that the RGRPQ peptide acts as a nutrient or stimulates the uptake of amino acids for growth or inhibits the uptake of sugars in the blockage of acid production.

Bacterial proteolysis of salivary PRPs may, similar to casein degradation by lactococci (29), release a network of peptides that favors oral commensal bacteria and inhibits pathogens. In this respect, it is noteworthy that the PRP-1 polypeptide, from which the RGRPQ peptide is released, may constitute a caries resistance factor or allele, whereas the proposed caries susceptibility Db allele encodes a protein with a 21-amino-acid insert close to the RGRPQ cleavage site. It is striking that the RGRPQ peptide carries information for proliferation, adhesion, and pH, all of which are key components in biofilm formation. Consequently, future studies on host-bacterium commensalism related to salivary PRPs or other innate polypeptides may uncover disease mechanisms and suggest strategies to interfere with biofilm formation and protect against bacterium-related diseases.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (projects 10906, 3532, 2002-8654, and 2003-3616), the Wallenberg Consortium North, the European Commission (LSHC-CT-2003-503297), the Swedish Cancer Society (project 4159), the Swedish Dental Society, the Swedish Society of Medicine, and the County Council of Västerbotten.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 13 January 2006.
    • Returned for modification 7 April 2006.
    • Accepted 15 August 2006.
  • Copyright © 2006 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Aravind, L., and D. Landsman. 1998. AT-hook motifs identified in a wide variety of DNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res.26:4413-4421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Ayad, M., B. C. Van Wuyckhuyse, K. Minaguchi, R. F. Raubertas, G. S. Bedi, R. J. Billings, W. H. Bowen, and L. A. Tabak. 2000. The association of basic proline-rich peptides from human parotid gland secretions with caries experience. J. Dent. Res.79:976-982.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Azen, E. A., and N. Maeda. 1988. Molecular genetics of human salivary proteins and their polymorphisms. Adv. Hum. Genet.17:141-199.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Becker, M. R., B. J. Paster, E. J. Leys, M. L. Moeschberger, S. G. Kenyon, J. L. Galvin, S. K. Boches, F. E. Dewhirst, and A. L. Griffen. 2002. Molecular analysis of bacterial species associated with childhood caries. J. Clin. Microbiol.40:1001-1009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Björck, L., P. Åkesson, M. Bohus, J. Trojnar, M. Abrahamson, I. Olafsson, and A. Grubb. 1989. Bacterial growth blocked by a synthetic peptide based on the structure of a human proteinase inhibitor. Nature337:385-386.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Bobek, L. A., and H. Situ. 2003. MUC7 20-Mer: investigation of antimicrobial activity, secondary structure, and possible mechanism of antifungal action. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.47:643-652.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Boman, H. G. 2000. Innate immunity and the normal microflora. Immunol. Rev.173:5-16.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  8. 8.↵
    Bowen, W. H., S. K. Pearson, and D. A. Young. 1988. The effect of desalivation on coronal and root surface caries in rats. J. Dent. Res.67:21-23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Bradshaw, D. J., A. S. McKee, and P. D. Marsh. 1989. Effects of carbohydrate pulses and pH on population shifts within oral microbial communities in vitro. J. Dent. Res.68:1298-1302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Burne, R. A., and R. E. Marquis. 2000. Alkali production by oral bacteria and protection against dental caries. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.193:1-6.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Collins, F. M., and P. B. Carter. 1978. Growth of salmonellae in orally infected germfree mice. Infect. Immun.21:41-47.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Collins, M. D., and G. R. Gibson. 1999. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics: approaches for modulating the microbial ecology of the gut. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.69:1052S-1057S.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    de Soet, J. J., B. Nyvad, and M. Kilian. 2000. Strain-related acid production by oral streptococci. Caries Res.34:486-490.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    Ericson, T., and J. Rundegren. 1983. Characterization of a salivary agglutinin reacting with a serotype c strain of Streptococcus mutans. Eur. J. Biochem.133:255-261.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Fuqua, C., and E. P. Greenberg. 2002. Listening in on bacteria: acyl-homoserine lactone signaling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.3:685-695.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Gibbons, R. J. 1989. Bacterial adhesion to oral tissues: a model for infectious diseases. J. Dent. Res.68:750-760.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Gibbons, R. J., and D. I. Hay. 1988. Human salivary acidic proline-rich proteins and statherin promote the attachment of Actinomyces viscosus LY7 to apatitic surfaces. Infect. Immun.56:439-445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Gibbons, R. J., D. I. Hay, and D. H. Schlesinger. 1991. Delineation of a segment of adsorbed salivary acidic proline-rich proteins which promotes adhesion of Streptococcus gordonii to apatitic surfaces. Infect. Immun.59:2948-2954.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Gilbert, M., W. J. Shaw, J. R. Long, K. Nelson, G. P. Drobny, C. M. Giachelli, and P. S. Stayton. 2000. Chimeric peptides of statherin and osteopontin that bind hydroxyapatite and mediate cell adhesion. J. Biol. Chem.275:16213-16218.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Hallberg, K., K.-J. Hammarström, E. Falsen, G. Dahlen, R. Gibbons, D. Hay, and N. Strömberg. 1988. Actinomyces naeslundii genospecies 1 and 2 express different binding specificities to N-acetyl-β-d-galactosamine, whereas Actinomyces odontolyticus expresses a different binding specificity in colonizing the human mouth. Oral Microbiol. Immunol.13:327-336.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.↵
    Havarstein, L. S., P. Gaustad, I. F. Nes, and D. A. Morrison. 1996. Identification of the streptococcal competence-pheromone receptor. Mol. Microbiol.21:863-869.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Hay, D. I., J. M. Ahern, S. K. Schluckebier, and D. H. Schlesinger. 1994. Human salivary acidic proline-rich protein polymorphisms and biosynthesis studied by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Dent. Res.73:1717-1726.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Hsu, S. D., J. O. Cisar, A. L. Sandberg, and M. Kilian. 1994. Adhesive properties of viridans streptococcal species. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis.7:125-137.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    Ji, G., R. C. Beavis, and R. P. Novick. 1995. Cell density control of staphylococcal virulence mediated by an octapeptide pheromone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92:12055-12059.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 25.↵
    Jonsson, A. P., Y. Aissouni, C. Palmberg, P. Percipalle, E. Nordling, B. Daneholt, H. Jörnvall, and T. Bergman. 2001. Recovery of gel-separated proteins for in-solution digestion and mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.73:5370-5377.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    Kelly, C. G., S. J. Younson, Y. B. Hikmat, M. S. Todryk, M. Czisch, I. H. Parvez, R. I. Flindall, C. Newby, I. A. Mallet, K. C. Ma Julian, and T. Lehner. 1999 Jan. A synthetic peptide adhesion epitope as a novel antimicrobial agent. Nat. Biotechnol.17:42-47.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Kilian, M., L. Mikkelsen, and J. Henrichsen. 1989. Taxonomic study of viridans streptococci: description of Streptococcus gordonii sp. nov. and emended descriptions of Streptococcus sanguis (White and Niven 1946), Streptococcus oralis (Bridge and Sneath 1982), and Streptococcus mitis (Andrewes and Horder 1906). Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol.39:471-484.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. 28.↵
    Kruger, C., Y. Hu, Q. Pan, H. Marcotte, A. Hultberg, D. Delwar, P. J. van Dalen, P. H. Pouwels, R. J. Leer, C. G. Kelly, C. van Dollenweerd, J. K. Ma, and L. Hammarstrom. 2002. In situ delivery of passive immunity by lactobacilli producing single-chain antibodies. Nat. Biotechnol.20:702-706.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. 29.↵
    Kunji, E. R., I. Mierau, A. Hagting, B. Poolman, and W. N. Konings. 1996. The proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Leeuwenhoek70:187-221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Lamkin, M. S., and F. G. Oppenheim. 1993. Structural features of salivary function. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.4:251-259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Lazazzera, B. A., and A. D. Grossman. 1998. The ins and outs of peptide signaling. Trends Microbiol.6:288-294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Li, T., P. Bratt, A. P. Jonsson, M. Ryberg, I. Johansson, W. J. Griffiths, T. Bergman, and N. Strömberg. 2000. Possible release of an ArgGlyArgProGln pentapeptide with innate immunity properties from acidic proline-rich proteins by proteolytic activity in commensal Streptococcus and Actinomyces species. Infect. Immun.68:5425-5429.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. 33.↵
    Li, T., M. K. Khah, S. Slavnic, I. Johansson, and N. Strömberg. 2001. Different type 1 fimbrial genes and tropisms of commensal and potentially pathogenic Actinomyces spp. with different salivary acidic proline-rich protein and statherin ligand specificities. Infect. Immun.69:7224-7233.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Liu, B., S. A. Rayment, C. Gyurko, F. G. Oppenheim, G. D. Offner, and R. F. Troxler. 2000. The recombinant N-terminal region of human salivary mucin MG2 (MUC7) contains a binding domain for oral Streptococci and exhibits candidacidal activity. Biochem. J. 345 Pt.3:557-564.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Medaglini, D., G. Pozzi, T. P. King, and V. A. Fischetti. 1995. Mucosal and systemic immune responses to a recombinant protein expressed on the surface of the oral commensal bacterium Streptococcus gordonii after oral colonization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92:6868-6872.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Nikawa, H., H. Fukushima, S. Makihira, T. Hamada, and L. P. Samaranayake. 2004. Fungicidal effect of three new synthetic cationic peptides against Candida albicans. Oral Dis.10:221-228.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  37. 37.↵
    Oppenheim, F. G., T. Xu, F. M. McMillian, S. M. Levitz, R. D. Diamond, G. D. Offner, and R. F. Troxler. 1988. Histatins, a novel family of histidine-rich proteins in human parotid secretion. Isolation, characterization, primary structure, and fungistatic effects on Candida albicans. J. Biol. Chem.263:7472-7477.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Pollock, J. J., L. Denepitiya, B. J. MacKay, and V. J. Iacono. 1984. Fungistatic and fungicidal activity of human parotid salivary histidine-rich polypeptides on Candida albicans. Infect. Immun.44:702-707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    Prakobphol, A., F. Xu, V. M. Hoang, T. Larsson, J. Bergström, I. Johansson, L. Frängsmyr, U. Holmskov, H. Leffler, C. Nilsson, T. Borén, J. R. Wright, N. Strömberg, and S. J. Fisher. 2000. Salivary agglutinin, which binds Streptococcus mutans and Helicobacter pylori, is the lung scavenger receptor cysteine-rich protein gp-340. J. Biol. Chem.275:39860-39866.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Scannapieco, F. A. 1994. Saliva-bacterium interactions in oral microbial ecology. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med.5:203-248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    Stenudd, C., A. Nordlund, M. Ryberg, I. Johansson, C. Källestål, and N. Strömberg. 2001. The association of bacterial adhesion with dental caries. J. Dent. Res.80:2005-2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. 42.↵
    Takahashi, N., S. Kalfas, and T. Yamada. 1994. The role of the succinate pathway in sorbitol fermentation by oral Actinomyces viscosus and Actinomyces naeslundii. Oral Microbiol. Immunol.9:218-223.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    Tanner, A., R. Kent, M. F. Maiden, and M. A. Taubman. 1996. Clinical, microbiological and immunological profile of healthy, gingivitis and putative active periodontal subjects. J. Periodontal Res.31:195-204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Terleckyj, B., N. P. Willett, and G. D. Shockman. 1975. Growth of several cariogenic strains of oral streptococci in a chemically defined medium. Infect. Immun.11:649-655.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Wang, B. Y., and H. K. Kuramitsu. 2005. Interactions between oral bacteria: inhibition of Streptococcus mutans bacteriocin production by Streptococcus gordonii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.71:354-362.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 46.↵
    Wijeyeweera, R. L., and I. Kleinberg. 1989. Arginolytic and ureolytic activities of pure cultures of human oral bacteria and their effects on the pH response of salivary sediment and dental plaque in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol.34:43-53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Host-Derived Pentapeptide Affecting Adhesion, Proliferation, and Local pH in Biofilm Communities Composed of Streptococcus and Actinomyces Species
Mirva  Drobni, Tong Li, Carina Krüger, Vuokko Loimaranta, Mogens Kilian, Lennart Hammarström, Hans Jörnvall, Tomas Bergman, Nicklas Strömberg
Infection and Immunity Oct 2006, 74 (11) 6293-6299; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00068-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Host-Derived Pentapeptide Affecting Adhesion, Proliferation, and Local pH in Biofilm Communities Composed of Streptococcus and Actinomyces Species
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Host-Derived Pentapeptide Affecting Adhesion, Proliferation, and Local pH in Biofilm Communities Composed of Streptococcus and Actinomyces Species
Mirva  Drobni, Tong Li, Carina Krüger, Vuokko Loimaranta, Mogens Kilian, Lennart Hammarström, Hans Jörnvall, Tomas Bergman, Nicklas Strömberg
Infection and Immunity Oct 2006, 74 (11) 6293-6299; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00068-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Actinomyces
Bacterial Adhesion
biofilms
cell proliferation
Oligopeptides
Streptococcus

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522