Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Immunity and Vaccines

A Live Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Vaccine Allows Serological Differentiation between Vaccinated and Infected Animals

Connie Adriaensen, Henri De Greve, Jean Q. Tian, Stéphane De Craeye, Eline Gubbels, Venessa Eeckhaut, Filip Van Immerseel, Richard Ducatelle, Mahesh Kumar, Jean-Pierre Hernalsteens
Connie Adriaensen
1Viral Genetics Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henri De Greve
1Viral Genetics Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
2Department of Molecular and Cellular Interactions, Flanders Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean Q. Tian
3Fort Dodge Animal Health, 800 Fifth Street NW, Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stéphane De Craeye
1Viral Genetics Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eline Gubbels
1Viral Genetics Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Venessa Eeckhaut
4Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Filip Van Immerseel
4Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Ducatelle
4Department of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mahesh Kumar
3Fort Dodge Animal Health, 800 Fifth Street NW, Fort Dodge, Iowa 50501
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Pierre Hernalsteens
1Viral Genetics Laboratory, Faculty of Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jphernal@vub.ac.be
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01357-06
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Three precisely defined deletion mutants of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis were constructed, a guanine auxotrophic ΔguaB mutant, a nonflagellated ΔfliC mutant, and an auxotrophic and nonflagellated ΔguaB ΔfliC double mutant. All three mutants were less invasive than the wild-type strain in primary chicken cecal epithelial cells and the human epithelial cell line T84 and less efficiently internalized in the chicken macrophage cell line HD11. The ΔfliC mutant was pathogenic in orally infected BALB/c mice, while the ΔguaB mutant was attenuated and conferred protection against a challenge with the pathogenic parent strain. The ΔguaB ΔfliC double mutant was totally asymptomatic and conferred better protection than the ΔguaB mutant. This indicates that the major flagellar protein flagellin is not required for efficient vaccination of BALB/c mice against Salmonella infection. The ΔguaB ΔfliC mutant was also safe for vaccination of 1-day-old chickens. After two immunizations, it induced statistically significant protection against infection of the internal organs of the birds by a virulent S. enterica serovar Enteritidis challenge strain but not against intestinal colonization. These data demonstrate that nonflagellated attenuated Salmonella mutants can be used as marker vaccines.

Human salmonellosis is mainly caused by consumption of food such as eggs, milk, and meat contaminated with salmonellae (12). Worldwide, salmonellosis is a serious medical and veterinary problem and raises great concern in the food industry. Vaccination is potentially an effective tool for the prevention of salmonellosis. Whole-cell killed vaccines and subunit vaccines were used with variable results for the prevention of Salmonella infection in humans and animals (21). Recent advances in the genetics of Salmonella led to the development of attenuated Salmonella vaccine strains with single or multiple defined mutations in the bacterial genome (21). Live attenuated Salmonella vaccines were also used successfully as carriers for the delivery of heterologous antigens to the immune system (21).

A major drawback of vaccination as a disease control measure is that immunized animals produce antibodies against the vaccine strain and can therefore no longer be distinguished from field-exposed animals by serological tests. Flagellin, the major structural protein of flagella, is used for the serotyping of Salmonella. Purified flagellin induces a high systemic, humoral, and mucosal immune response in C3H/HeJ mice (38). While mice immunized intraperitoneally with flagellated Salmonella show a strong systemic (immunoglobulin G IgG) response against flagellin, mice immunized mucosally with the strain did not (34). Nevertheless, flagella elicit a strong immune response in chickens (27, 44) and are useful serological markers that carry the serotype-specific H-antigenic determinants (17) in the central variable domain of the protein (41). Therefore, deletion of fliC, the gene that codes for flagellin (FliC) should allow serological differentiation between animals immunized with the ΔfliC vaccine strain and animals infected by wild-type S. enterica serovar Enteritidis. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (FlockChek Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis antibody test kit from IDEXX Laboratories) is available to detect antibodies against H-antigenic determinants of the FliC flagellin of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (H:g,m). Specific antibodies against S. enterica serovar Enteritidis FliC were detected in sera of spray-inoculated young chickens but not in sera of young chickens inoculated orally with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis (27).

The attenuation of guaB mutants of S. enterica serovars Dublin and Typhimurium was previously described (22). S. enterica serovar Typhi ΔguaBA mutants are attenuated and induce strong serum O- and H-antigen responses in mice inoculated intranasally (46).

The present study shows that an S. enterica serovar Enteritidis guaB mutant is attenuated but retains some residual virulence in inoculated mice. Protection against the homologous parent strain was observed in BALB/c mice after a challenge with the parent S. enterica serovar Enteritidis strain. Moreover, a ΔguaB ΔfliC double-deletion mutant of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis was more attenuated than the ΔguaB single mutant in BALB/c mice and conferred better protection of immunized mice against a challenge with the wild-type strain. The double mutant was safe for 1-day-old chicks when administered by the intratracheal or oral gavage route. Vaccination of chicks with the ΔguaB ΔfliC double-deletion mutant protected them against colonization of the internal organs by virulent S. enterica serovar Typhimurium but not against intestinal colonization.

The lack of flagellin may be exploited both as a marker for the live vaccine strain and as a serological marker facilitating the differentiation between vaccinated chickens and chickens infected with an S. enterica serovar Enteritidis field strain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains. S. enterica serovar Enteritidis phage type 4 strain 76Sa88, isolated from a turkey (8), was used in all experiments. MiniTn5lacZ2 insertion mutants of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 Rifr were obtained essentially as previously described (7). S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 contains only one gene that codes for flagellin, fliC.

Construction of guaB and fliC deletion mutants.The guaB and fliC genes of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 were deleted by homologous recombination of PCR fragments, with the Red recombinase system of bacteriophage Lambda (5). The sequences of the primers used are shown in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Nucleotide sequences of primers used for PCR amplification or sequencing

To construct an S. enterica serovar Enteritidis guaB deletion mutant, overlap PCR (13) was performed with two fragments that were amplified, respectively, with primer sets GuaB3-GuaB4 and GuaB5-GuaB2 and with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis genomic DNA as the template. A nested PCR with primer set GuaB6-GuaB7 was subsequently carried out to amplify a linear fragment in which an 861-bp internal segment of the coding sequence of guaB was replaced with an SmaI site. This PCR fragment was cloned into the SmaI site of pUC18 with the Sureclone ligation kit (Pharmacia Biotech). A chloramphenicol resistance gene with flanking FLP recombinase target (FRT) sites, amplified with plasmid pKD3 DNA as the template and primer set P1-P2 (5), was ligated into the SmaI site of the cloned ΔguaB fragment. The PCR fragment (ΔguaB::catFRT) generated on this clone with primer set GuaB6-GuaB7 was introduced by electroporation (32) into S. enterica serovar Enteritidis, previously transformed with pKD46 (5), after induction of the Red recombinase system with 0.2% arabinose.

For the construction of a ΔfliC deletion mutant and a ΔguaB ΔfliC double mutant of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis, a recombinant fragment harboring the kanamycin resistance gene with flanking FRT sites (kanFRT) and extensions homologous to the initial 50 (1 to 50) and the terminal 50 (1468 to 1518) nucleotides of the fliC coding sequence, was amplified with pKD4 plasmid DNA as the template and primers FliCP1 and FliCP2. The ΔfliC mutants were obtained by electroporation of the resulting PCR fragment into S. enterica serovar Enteritidis(pKD46) and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB::catFRT(pKD46) as previously described (5).

P22 transduction.To avoid additional undesirable mutations, the substitution mutations containing the selectable resistance genes were transduced into a wild-type S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 background with bacteriophage P22 HT int (6). Antibiotic resistance genes were subsequently eliminated with pCP20 (5), and the deletions were confirmed by PCR and phenotypic characterization as described further.

Virulence in and protection of mice.Seven-week-old female BALB/c mice were orally inoculated to evaluate the virulence and efficacy as a vaccine of the ΔguaB and ΔguaB ΔfliC deletion mutants. A ΔfliC mutant was also included to study the effect of inactivation of the fliC gene on the virulence of the wild-type strain. For the virulence assay, mice each received about 108 CFU of the bacterial strains that were cultured overnight in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (25) and suspended in milk. This dose corresponds to approximately 105 times the 50% lethal dose of the wild-type strain (30). As a positive control, mice were inoculated with wild-type pathogenic S. enterica serovar Enteritidis strain 76Sa88. Noninfected control mice were inoculated with milk. The efficacy of the mutants was determined in vaccinated mice 3 weeks after the initial immunization by oral challenge with about 108 CFU of wild-type S. enterica serovar Enteritidis strain 76Sa88 per mouse. The challenged mice were observed for 21 days for death and clinical signs. The animal experiments were performed by following all relevant national and institutional guidelines.

Invasion and phagocytosis assays.Invasion experiments were performed with the human colon carcinoma cell line T84 and with chicken primary cecal epithelial cells as previously described (43). Phagocytosis assays (29) were performed with the chicken macrophage cell line HD11 (2).

Briefly, cells of the human colon carcinoma cell line T84 were seeded in 96-well cell culture plates at a density of 105 cells/well in cell culture medium (Dulbecco modified Eagle medium plus 10% fetal calf serum and 2% l-glutamine without antibiotics) and grown overnight. The bacteria were grown overnight at 37°C in 5 ml of LB broth (25) on a shaker platform, subcultured 1:100 in fresh LB broth (5 ml), and grown to late log phase at 37°C without shaking. After 5 h of incubation, the bacterial suspensions were centrifuged and resuspended in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium with 10% fetal calf serum. The number of CFU per milliliter was determined by plating on brilliant green (BG) agar at 37°C. The suspensions were kept at 4°C until they were used in the assay, diluted to a density corresponding to a multiplicity of infection of 10, and added to the cultured cells. To ensure close contact between the bacteria and the cells, the plates were centrifuged for 10 min at 1,500 rpm and incubated for 1 h at 37°C under 5% CO2. The cells were subsequently rinsed three times with Hanks’ balanced salt solution (Life Technologies, Paisley, Scotland). Cell culture medium with gentamicin (50 μg/ml) was added, and the plates were incubated for 1 h at 37°C under 5% CO2. Thereafter, the cells were rinsed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed with 1% Triton X-100 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in distilled water. From this lysate, a 10-fold dilution series was plated on BG agar plates. Invasion and phagocytosis assays with chicken primary cells and chicken macrophage cells (HD11) were performed essentially as described above, with some modifications (29, 43). All assays were performed in duplicate, with three repeats of each experiment. Percentages of invasion and phagocytosis by defined S. enterica serovar Enteritidis mutants, relative to invasion and phagocytosis by the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis wild-type strain (100%), were calculated. Analysis of variance was performed with SPSS 12.0 software.

Safety assessment with chickens.The safety of the ΔguaB and ΔguaB ΔfliC isogenic mutant strains was evaluated with chickens in two experiments by inoculation of 1-day-old chicks (SPAFAS). In the first experiment, the safety of the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB strain was determined with four groups of 10 1-day-old chicks. Chicks in groups 1 and 2 were inoculated by the intratracheal route and by oral gavage, respectively. Birds in control groups 3 and 4 were inoculated with PBS, respectively, by the intratracheal and oral gavage routes. Mortality was recorded for 38 days.

In the second experiment, the safety of the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC mutant was also evaluated with four groups of 1-day-old chicks. Similar to the first experiment, 10 chicks in groups 1 and 2 were inoculated by the intratracheal route and by oral gavage, respectively. Ten birds in group 3 were inoculated by the intratracheal route with the Poulvac ST aroA S. enterica serovar Typhimurium vaccine (Fort Dodge Animal Health). Five birds in group 4 were inoculated with PBS by the intratracheal route. The body weight of each bird from all four groups was measured at 21 days postinoculation. Body weight was compared among groups in an analysis-of-variance model with body weight as the dependent variable and treatment included as an independent variable. The estimated body weight and its 95% confidence interval were constructed. Group comparisons were made with Tukey's test for multiple comparisons. The frequency distribution of the continuous outcome (body weight) was assessed by PROC UNIVARIATE. All analysis of data was performed with the SAS system (SAS Institute Inc.). The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Efficacy assessment with chickens.One-day-old specific-pathogen-free white Leghorn chicks were randomly divided into five groups. Birds in groups 1 and 1A were vaccinated with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB by coarse spray on the first day. At 2 weeks of age, these birds received a second vaccine dose by drinking water (group 1) or by oral gavage (group 1A). Birds in groups 2 and 2A were vaccinated with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC by coarse spray on the first day. At 2 weeks of age, these birds received a second vaccine dose by drinking water (group 2) or by oral gavage (group 2A). Birds in group 3 were administered PBS by spray on the first day.

At 6 weeks of age, the birds from all groups were challenged by oral gavage with virulent S. enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 (nalidixic acid resistant) and observed for clinical signs and death.

At 7 days postchallenge, all surviving birds were necropsied. Tissue samples of approximately 1 g each of the spleen, kidney, and liver from each bird were obtained aseptically. These were pooled in sterile swirl pack bags containing 10 ml BG tetrathionate broth (BGTB; prepared with BG broth and tetrathionate broth base obtained from Difco Laboratories, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD), macerated for 30 s in a Stomacher blender, and incubated at 42°C for 24 h. Also, 10-mm lengths of the duodenum (bottom of the duodenal loop below the pancreas), jejunum (region of yolk sac diverticulum), and ileum (anterior to the ileocecal junction) were aseptically collected from each bird, flushed internally and externally with sterile PBS, pooled in sterile swirl pack bags containing 10 ml BGTB medium, macerated for 30 s in a Stomacher blender, and incubated at 42°C. After 24 h of incubation, a loopful of culture from each swirl pack bag was streaked onto BG and xylose-lysine-tergitol 4 agar plates (26) supplemented with 100 μg/ml nalidixic acid. The swirl pack bags were incubated further for another 24 h. If Salmonella isolation was negative after 48 h, 1 ml culture from each bag was transferred to a tube containing 10 ml BGTB medium. The tube was incubated for 24 h, and the culture was streaked onto BG and xylose-lysine-tergitol 4 agar plates containing 100 μg/ml nalidixic acid. When S. enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 grew on either of the plates, the pool was considered positive.

For assessing Salmonella colonization of the cecum, approximately 1 g of cecal content collected from each bird was placed in a swirl pack bag containing 100 ml of sterile PBS and mixed thoroughly. A 0.1-ml sample of the suspension was plated in duplicate on BG agar plates supplemented with 100 μg/ml nalidixic acid. When S. enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 grew on either of the plates, the pool was considered positive. An agglutination test with group D Salmonella antiserum was performed with at least one colony from all positive plates to confirm the presence of a group D Salmonella.

Data analysis was performed with the SAS system (SAS Institute Inc.). For statistical analysis, the experimental unit was the individual bird. The outcome was Salmonella isolation, and the study tested the null hypothesis that there would be no difference in Salmonella isolation among groups. Salmonella isolation (percentage or number of organisms recovered) was compared between each group and its control group by chi-square analysis. When expected cell sizes were too small, comparisons were made by Fisher's exact test. Group comparisons were made by the bootstrap method (PROC MULTTEST). The relative risk and its 95% confidence interval were constructed for each comparison.

RESULTS

A guaB mutant is attenuated in mice and induces protection.In a set of miniTn5lacZ2 insertion mutants of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 Rifr, several auxotrophic mutants were identified. One of these mutants was characterized as a guaB mutant, since it grows on minimal A medium (25) complemented with 0.3 mM guanine, guanosine, xanthine, or xanthosine but not on medium complemented with hypoxanthine or inosine. The guaB gene (47) encodes the enzyme IMP dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.205), which converts IMP to XMP, the penultimate step in the biosynthetic pathway of GMP. The insertion of the miniTn5lacZ2 transposon into the guaB gene of the mutant was confirmed by PCR (data not shown).

Three mice at 7 weeks of age were orally inoculated with the guaB insertion mutant by administering 3.5 × 108 CFU per mouse. All three mice remained healthy during the 21-day observation period and were then challenged by oral administration of 2.7 × 108 CFU of wild-type strain S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 per mouse. All three mice survived the challenge. As a positive control, wild-type strain S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 (4.4 × 108 CFU) was orally given to three BALB/c mice of the same age that were not previously immunized. All three mice died within 6 days. These results demonstrate that the guaB mutant is highly attenuated in mice and that oral immunization of mice with this mutant protects them against infection by wild-type S. enterica serovar Enteritidis.

Construction of guaB and fliC deletion mutants.A guaB deletion mutant was constructed to avoid reversion of the miniTn5lacZ2 insertion mutant and to remove the kanamycin resistance gene of miniTn5lacZ2. After electroporation of a linear fragment (containing a ΔguaB::catFRT mutation) in S. enterica serovar Enteritidis, chloramphenicol-resistant S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB::catFRT mutants that require supplementation of minimal A medium (25) with 0.3 mM guanine were selected. The replacement of guaB with the chloramphenicol resistance cassette was further confirmed by PCR with primer combinations GuaB6-GuaB7, GuaB6-P2, GuaB7-P1, and P1-P2.

To delete the flagellin gene fliC, an internal 1,416-bp segment (bp 51 to 1467) of the fliC coding sequence (AY649742.1) was replaced with the kanamycin resistance gene in S. enterica serovar Enteritidis(pKD46) and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 ΔguaB::catFRT(pKD46). By homologous recombination, S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔfliC::kanFRT and the double mutant S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB::catFRT ΔfliC::kanFRT were generated. Isogenic strains were obtained after P22 transduction of the antibiotic resistance-encoding substitution mutations to a wild-type background. The antibiotic resistance genes were subsequently excised with plasmid pCP20 (5). The colonies were tested for carbenicillin, chloramphenicol, and/or kanamycin sensitivity to ascertain the loss of the plasmid pCP20 and the elimination of the antibiotic resistance genes. Both the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC mutants required guanine (0.3 mM) for growth on minimal A medium. The S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔfliC mutants were nonmotile on LB medium containing 0.4% agar. The deletion mutants were confirmed by PCR with primer combinations GuaB6-GuaB7 for guaB and FliC1-FliC2 for fliC. Sequencing (33) of the resulting fragments with primers GuaB10 and FliC3, respectively, confirmed the presence of the P1-FRT-P2 scar sequence.

The ΔguaB ΔfliC double mutant is safe and confers full protection on mice.To study the effect of the deletion of the fliC gene on the immunogenicity of the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB vaccine strain, virulence and protection tests with both mutants were carried out with 7-week-old female BALB/c mice. Two independent experiments were performed (Table 2). Mice infected with the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB mutant showed typical Salmonella disease symptoms (reduced activity, untidy coat, and curved back), and 1 out of 10 died in the first experiment, while no disease symptoms were observed in the second experiment. The ΔguaB ΔfliC double mutant did not induce disease symptoms in both experiments. All mice inoculated with the wild-type S. enterica serovar Enteritidis strain died within 9 days after infection, while the noninfected control mice remained healthy during the observation period of 21 days.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Evaluation of virulence and efficacy of ΔguaB and ΔguaB ΔfliC mutants of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis in micea

One mouse immunized with the ΔguaB mutant died after challenge with the wild-type S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 strain. All other immunized mice survived the challenge without observable disease symptoms. All nonimmunized control mice died after challenge. These data show that both mutants are attenuated and confer protection against a challenge with the corresponding wild-type parent strain.

Additional mutations, due to unwanted recombination events caused by the Red recombinase, can influence the results. Therefore, the experiment was repeated with isogenic strains that were constructed by P22 transduction.

A ΔfliC mutant was also included to study the effect of inactivation of the fliC gene on the virulence of the prototrophic wild-type strain. This ΔfliC mutant remained as virulent as the wild-type strain under these conditions. Data obtained from the ΔguaB and ΔguaB ΔfliC transductants (Table 3) confirmed the observations made in the first experiments. The ΔguaB ΔfliC double mutant is more attenuated in BALB/c mice and confers better protection against challenges with high doses of the wild-type strain than the ΔguaB mutant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Evaluation of virulence and efficacy of isogenic deletion mutants of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis in micea

Immunization with ΔguaB and ΔguaB ΔfliC mutants generates high anti-lipopolysaccharide (LPS) IgG titers.Fifty-four days following initial oral immunization of BALB/c mice with approximately 108 CFU per mouse of, respectively, the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC mutants, blood samples were collected from the tail arteries of five mice. Anti-LPS IgG titers were determined by means of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with the use of 0.5 μg of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis LPS (Sigma) per well for coating. Comparison between sera of mice immunized with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB and mice immunized with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC showed that, in both cases, comparable anti-LPS serum IgG responses were elicited. A second and third boost did not enhance the anti-LPS serum IgG levels (data not shown).

Reduced invasiveness and phagocytosis of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis mutants.The isogenic ΔguaB and ΔfliC single mutants and the ΔguaB ΔfliC double mutant were less invasive than the wild-type S. enterica serovar Enteritidis strain in the human colon carcinoma cell line T84 and in isolated primary chicken cecal epithelial cells (Table 4). Internalization of these mutants in the chicken macrophage cell line HD11 was also reduced compared to that of wild-type strain (Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4.

Percentages of invasion and phagocytosis by ΔguaB, ΔfliC, and ΔguaB ΔfliC mutants relative to invasion and phagocytosis by the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 wild-type strain (100%)a

The ΔguaB ΔfliC mutant is safe in 1-day-old chicks.Ten 1-day-old chicks were inoculated intratracheally with the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB mutant strain (group 1) at 1.3 × 108 CFU per chick. One bird died during inoculation. Two birds died at 2 days postinoculation, and three birds died, respectively, at days 3, 5, and 13 postinoculation. Out of the 10 birds inoculated with the same dose of this strain by oral gavage (group 2), 1 chick died because of inoculation trauma during oral gavage and 1 bird died at day 5 postinoculation. No birds in the PBS-treated groups (groups 3 and 4) died. These results indicate that the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB mutant strain is not safe in chickens when administered at 1.3 × 108 CFU per bird at 1 day of age by the intratracheal or oral gavage route.

One-day-old chicks that were inoculated with the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC mutant strain at 2.5 × 107 CFU per chick by the intratracheal or oral gavage route survived the 21-day observation period, and no deaths were recorded. Also, chicks inoculated with Poulvac ST (a licensed commercial vaccine), used as an intratracheal procedural control, and chicks inoculated with PBS survived the inoculation. Twenty-one days after inoculation, the average weight and standard deviation of the birds in groups 2, 3, and 4 were, respectively, 0.224 ± 0.018 kg, 0.200 ± 0.019 kg, and 0.205 ± 0.009 kg. The body weights of the chicks inoculated with the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC mutant are not statistically significantly different from the body weights of the chicks vaccinated with the Poulvac ST vaccine or the body weights of the chicks inoculated with PBS. The average body weight (0.181 ± 0.030 kg) of the birds in group 1, which received the vaccine strain by intratracheal administration, was statistically significantly lower (P = 0.0009) than the average body weight of birds that were immunized with the same strain by oral gavage. It can be concluded that S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC is safe in 1-day-old chicks after inoculation with 2.5 × 107 CFU per bird by the intratracheal or oral gavage route.

Immunization with the ΔguaB ΔfliC mutant protects chickens against infection of the internal organs by S. enterica serovar Enteritidis.Immunization of chicks with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC and oral challenge with a virulent nalidixic acid-resistant S. enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 strain were performed as described in Materials and Methods and in Table 5.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5.

Results of virulent S. enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 challenge strain isolation from vaccinated chickens after challengea

The vaccine strains were administered at 1 day of age by coarse spray and at 2 weeks of age by drinking water or oral gavage. The vaccines were deemed safe because no birds died and no adverse effects were observed in the postvaccination period, confirming the results of the previous experiment.

Four weeks post the second vaccination, the birds were challenged with 8.5 × 107 CFU of a virulent nalidixic acid-resistant S. enterica serovar Enteritidis PT4 strain. One week after the challenge, samples of organs (kidney, liver, and spleen), intestines (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum), and cecal contents were tested for the presence of the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis challenge strain. The results summarized in Table 5 show that the vaccine candidates S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC protect the organs against infection but do not protect the intestines and ceca against colonization by pathogenic S. enterica serovar Enteritidis.

DISCUSSION

Virulence and efficacy studies carried out with the guaB::miniTn5lacZ2 insertion mutant of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis 76Sa88 showed that the mutant was attenuated and conferred partial protective immunity against infection with the wild-type parent strain after oral immunization of BALB/c mice. These results were confirmed with the corresponding deletion mutant.

The lack of guanine biosynthesis in the ΔguaB mutant could be a limiting factor for gene expression, resulting in decreased invasion and in attenuation of the mutant strain. Invasion and survival of the bacteria in animal cells require expression of genes located on SPI-1 and SPI-2. The expression level of 20% of Salmonella genes is altered upon entry into cultured macrophages, with 384 genes being up-regulated (10). The effect could also be explained at the level of phagosome-lysosome formation, as bacterial protein synthesis is involved in the inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion (16).

A major drawback of vaccination as a disease control measure is that the immunized animals produce antibodies against the vaccine strain and can therefore no longer be distinguished by serological tests from animals infected by wild-type strains. This can, in principle, be avoided by introducing a mutation in a gene that encodes an antigen of the vaccine strain. Flagellin (FliC), the major structural protein of flagella, is a dominant antigen that is used for serotyping of Salmonella (41). Bacterial flagellin in monomeric form is recognized by Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5) (3, 23, 37), which is expressed on different murine cell types and in chicken heterophils (19). Binding of flagellin to TLR5 can activate expression of inflammatory (9, 28, 36, 39, 48) and antiapoptotic mediators (49). TLR signaling activates nuclear factor κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways via the adaptor molecule MyD88 (myeloid differentiation factor 88) (1) and activates the transcription of genes that encode immune modulators (40). Mammalian macrophages respond to cytosolic flagellin through members of the NOD-like receptor family (11). Flagellin is the ligand for Ipaf, a NOD-like receptor protein that is known to be involved in caspase I activation and interleukin-1β secretion in macrophages (24). Since flagellin is a target of the innate and adaptive immune response (14, 23, 31), the influence of the inactivation of the flagellin gene on the efficacy of the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB vaccine strain was investigated. Deletion of the fliC gene in the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB strain reduced its residual pathogenicity but did not reduce the efficacy of protection after challenge of immunized BALB/c mice, as shown in three independent experiments. These results confirm that FliC is not a dominant protective antigen (18) in BALB/c mice. The ΔfliC single mutant of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis remains virulent in mice. This confirms and extends the previous work on S. enterica serovar Typhimurium demonstrating that flagella are not necessary for pathogenicity in mice (35). Aflagellate Salmonella mutants are impaired in the ability to activate expression of proinflammatory and antiapoptotic effector molecules in murine models of salmonellosis but are potent activators of epithelial caspases and subsequent apoptosis (45). This correlates with a delayed but stronger mucosal inflammation at later stages of infection, as well as an elevated extraintestinal and systemic bacterial load, culminating in a more severe clinical outcome.

Chicken TLR5 (chTLR5) is expressed in a broad range of tissues. Exposure of cells expressing chTLR5 to flagellin induced upregulation of chicken interleukin-1β. Aflagellate S. enterica serovar Typhimurium fliM mutants showed an enhanced ability to establish a systemic infection in chicks and induced less interleukin-1β expression and polymorphonuclear cell infiltration of the gut. These results suggested that recognition of flagellin by chTLR5 contributes to the protection against systemic salmonellosis (15).

As shown in the different in vitro assays, the ΔguaB and ΔfliC single mutants and, in particular, the ΔguaB ΔfliC double mutant are less capable than the wild-type strain to invade the human epithelial cell line T84 and primary chicken cecal epithelial cells. Also, the internalization of the mutants in the chicken macrophage cell line HD11 is lower than that of the wild-type strain. These data are in line with the observation that the ability of a fliC mutant of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis to invade Caco-2 cells was reduced about 50 times compared to that of the corresponding wild-type strain, while bacterial adherence was not significantly different (42). Aflagellate S. enterica serovar Enteritidis showed a significant reduction in the invasion of human epithelial Hep-2 cells, compared to flagellate cells, and induced fewer membrane ruffles than the wild-type strain (20). Flagella are also required for efficient invasion of tissue cultures by S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (35).

Inoculation of 1-day-old chicks by the intratracheal or oral gavage route confirmed that the ΔguaB ΔfliC mutant was more attenuated than the ΔguaB mutant in chickens, resulting in a safe vaccine strain. The vaccine candidates S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB and S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC protect the organs against infection but do not protect against colonization of the intestines and ceca after a challenge with a virulent S. enterica serovar Enteritidis strain. Also, in other studies using attenuated Salmonella vaccines in chickens, the conclusion was made that protection against infection of internal organs is easier to achieve than effective protection against intestinal colonization (4). Although vaccination with the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis mutants did not significantly reduce the number of birds carrying the wild-type strain in the intestine and cecum after a challenge, the possibility that a lower excretion rate would be associated with vaccination cannot be excluded. This would reduce the transmission of the pathogen but could also interfere with the bacteriological detection of Salmonella infections.

Our results show that the inactivation of flagellin does not reduce the efficacy of the vaccine strain and thus can be further tested as a marker in attenuated vaccines. The resulting absence of antiflagellin antibodies in sera of immunized animals can be used as a serological marker to distinguish between field-infected animals and animals vaccinated with S. enterica serovar Enteritidis live-vaccine strains. The antibody response against the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC vaccine strain cannot be distinguished from the response against S. enterica serovar Gallinarum and its biotype Pullorum. However, these host-restricted pathogens are not problematic for public health, normally induce typical clinical symptoms in their animal hosts, and can be distinguished from the S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC vaccine strain by PCR (replacement of the guaB and fliC genes in the vaccine strain) and bacteriological culture techniques (guanine auxotrophy of the vaccine strain and natural nutrient requirements of the host-restricted serovars). In the same way, the nonmotile and guanine auxotrophic S. enterica serovar Enteritidis ΔguaB ΔfliC vaccine strain can easily be differentiated from wild-type S. enterica serovar Enteritidis field strains. By transduction or Red-mediated recombination, guaB and flagellin mutations can easily be introduced into other important S. enterica serovars. Possibly, this will allow the production of useful attenuated vaccine strains.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Isabelle Dewerte, Francine Deboeck, and Christine Anschutz for excellent technical support.

This work was supported by research grants from the Belgian Ministry of Small Enterprises, Traders and Agriculture; the Belgian Federal Public Service Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment; the FWO-Vlaanderen (FWOAL241); and Fort Dodge Animal Health, Iowa.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 23 August 2006.
    • Returned for modification 9 October 2006.
    • Accepted 22 January 2007.
  • Copyright © 2007 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Akira, S., and K. Takeda. 2004. Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol.4:499-511.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.↵
    Beug, H., A. von Kirchbach, G. Doderlein, J. F. Conscience, and T. Graf. 1979. Chicken hematopoietic cells transformed by seven strains of defective avian leukemia viruses display three distinct phenotypes of differentiation. Cell18:375-390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Ciacci-Woolwine, F., I. C. Blomfield, S. H. Richardson, and S. B. Mizel. 1998. Salmonella flagellin induces tumor necrosis factor alpha in a human promonocytic cell line. Infect. Immun.66:1127-1134.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Curtiss, R., III, and J. O. Hassan. 1996. Nonrecombinant and recombinant avirulent Salmonella vaccines for poultry. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.54:365-372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  5. 5.↵
    Datsenko, K. A., and B. L. Wanner. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:6640-6645.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Davis, R. W., D. Botstein, and J. R. Roth. 1980. Advanced bacterial genetics: a manual for genetic engineering. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  7. 7.↵
    de Lorenzo, V., M. Herrero, U. Jakubzik, and K. N. Timmis. 1990. Mini-Tn5 transposon derivatives for insertion mutagenesis, promoter probing, and chromosomal insertion of cloned DNA in gram-negative eubacteria. J. Bacteriol.172:6568-6572.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Desmidt, M., R. Ducatelle, J. Mast, B. M. Goddeeris, B. Kaspers, and F. Haesebrouck. 1998. Role of the humoral immune system in Salmonella enteritidis phage type four infection in chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol.63:355-367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Eaves-Pyles, T., K. Murthy, L. Liaudet, L. Virag, G. Ross, F. G. Soriano, C. Szabo, and A. L. Salzman. 2001. Flagellin, a novel mediator of Salmonella-induced epithelial activation and systemic inflammation: IκBα degradation, induction of nitric oxide synthase, induction of proinflammatory mediators, and cardiovascular dysfunction. J. Immunol.166:1248-1260.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Eriksson, S., S. Lucchini, A. Thompson, M. Rhen, and J. C. Hinton. 2003. Unravelling the biology of macrophage infection by gene expression profiling of intracellular Salmonella enterica. Mol. Microbiol.47:103-118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Franchi, L., A. Amer, M. Body-Malapel, T. D. Kanneganti, N. Ozoren, R. Jagirdar, N. Inohara, P. Vandenabeele, J. Bertin, A. Coyle, E. P. Grant, and G. Nunez. 2006. Cytosolic flagellin requires Ipaf for activation of caspase-1 and interleukin 1β in Salmonella-infected macrophages. Nat. Immunol.7:576-582.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Guard-Petter, J. 2001. The chicken, the egg and Salmonella enteritidis. Environ. Microbiol.3:421-430.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  13. 13.↵
    Ho, S. N., H. D. Hunt, R. M. Horton, J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease. 1989. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene77:51-59.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Honko, A. N., and S. B. Mizel. 2005. Effects of flagellin on innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol. Res.33:83-101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Iqbal, M., V. J. Philbin, G. S. Withanage, P. Wigley, R. K. Beal, M. J. Goodchild, P. Barrow, I. McConnell, D. J. Maskell, J. Young, N. Bumstead, Y. Boyd, and A. L. Smith. 2005. Identification and functional characterization of chicken Toll-like receptor 5 reveals a fundamental role in the biology of infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Infect. Immun.73:2344-2350.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Ishibashi, Y., and T. Arai. 1990. Specific inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion in murine macrophages mediated by Salmonella typhimurium infection. FEMS Microbiol. Immunol.2:35-43.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Kauffmann F. 1964. The world problem of salmonellosis, p. 21-66. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  18. 18.↵
    Kodama, C., and H. Matsui. 2004. Salmonella flagellin is not a dominant protective antigen in oral immunization with attenuated live vaccine strains. Infect. Immun.72:2449-2451.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Kogut, M. H., M. Iqbal, H. He, V. Philbin, P. Kaiser, and A. Smith. 2005. Expression and function of Toll-like receptors in chicken heterophils. Dev. Comp. Immunol.29:791-807.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    La Ragione, R. M., W. A. Cooley, P. Velge, M. A. Jepson, and M. J. Woodward. 2003. Membrane ruffling and invasion of human and avian cell lines is reduced for aflagellate mutants of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis. Int. J. Med. Microbiol.293:261-272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Mastroeni, P., J. A. Chabalgoity, S. J. Dunstan, D. J. Maskell, and G. Dougan. 2001. Salmonella: immune responses and vaccines. Vet. J.161:132-164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    McFarland, W. C., and B. A. Stocker. 1987. Effect of different purine auxotrophic mutations on mouse-virulence of a Vi-positive strain of Salmonella dublin and of two strains of Salmonella typhimurium. Microb. Pathog.3:129-141.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    McSorley, S. J., B. T. Cookson, and M. K. Jenkins. 2000. Characterization of CD4+ T cell responses during natural infection with Salmonella typhimurium. J. Immunol.164:986-993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    Miao, E. A., C. M. Alpuche-Aranda, M. Dors, A. E. Clark, M. W. Bader, S. I. Miller, and A. Aderem. 2006. Cytoplasmic flagellin activates caspase-1 and secretion of interleukin 1β via Ipaf. Nat. Immunol.7:569-575.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Miller, J. H. 1992. A short course in bacterial genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  26. 26.↵
    Miller, R. G., C. R. Tate, E. T. Mallinson, and J. A. Scherrer. 1991. Xylose-lysine-tergitol 4: an improved selective agar medium for the isolation of Salmonella. Poult. Sci.70:2429-2432.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Mizumoto, N., Y. Toyota-Hanatani, K. Sasai, H. Tani, T. Ekawa, H. Ohta, and E. Baba. 2004. Detection of specific antibodies against deflagellated Salmonella enteritidis and S. enteritidis FliC-specific 9kDa polypeptide. Vet. Microbiol.99:113-120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Ogushi, K., A. Wada, T. Niidome, N. Mori, K. Oishi, T. Nagatake, A. Takahashi, H. Asakura, S. Makino, H. Hojo, Y. Nakahara, M. Ohsaki, T. Hatakeyama, H. Aoyagi, H. Kurazono, J. Moss, and T. Hirayama. 2001. Salmonella enteritidis FliC (flagella filament protein) induces human beta-defensin-2 mRNA production by Caco-2 cells. J. Biol. Chem.276:30521-30526.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    Pasmans, F., F. Van Immerseel, K. Hermans, M. Heyndrickx, J. M. Collard, R. Ducatelle, and F. Haesebrouck. 2004. Assessment of virulence of pigeon isolates of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium variant Copenhagen for humans. J. Clin. Microbiol.42:2000-2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Pattery, T., J.-P. Hernalsteens, and H. De Greve. 1999. Identification and molecular characterization of a novel Salmonella enteritidis pathogenicity islet encoding an ABC transporter. Mol. Microbiol.33:791-805.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Salazar-Gonzalez, R. M., and S. J. McSorley. 2005. Salmonella flagellin, a microbial target of the innate and adaptive immune system. Immunol. Lett.101:117-122.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Sambrook, J., and D. W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
  33. 33.↵
    Sanger, F., S. Nicklen, and A. R. Coulson. 1977. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA74:5463-5467.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Sbrogio-Almeida, M. E., and L. C. Ferreira. 2001. Flagellin expressed by live Salmonella vaccine strains induces distinct antibody responses following delivery via systemic or mucosal immunization routes. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.30:203-208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Schmitt, C. K., J. S. Ikeda, S. C. Darnell, P. R. Watson, J. Bispham, T. S. Wallis, D. L. Weinstein, E. S. Metcalf, and A. D. O'Brien. 2001. Absence of all components of the flagellar export and synthesis machinery differentially alters virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in models of typhoid fever, survival in macrophages, tissue culture invasiveness, and calf enterocolitis. Infect. Immun.69:5619-5625.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Sierro, F., B. Dubois, A. Coste, D. Kaiserlian, J. P. Kraehenbuhl, and J. C. Sirard. 2001. Flagellin stimulation of intestinal epithelial cells triggers CCL20-mediated migration of dendritic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98:13722-13727.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Smith, K. D., E. Andersen-Nissen, F. Hayashi, K. Strobe, M. A. Bergman, S. L. Barrett, B. T. Cookson, and A. Aderem. 2003. Toll-like receptor 5 recognizes a conserved site on flagellin required for protofilament formation and bacterial motility. Nat. Immunol.4:1247-1253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 38.↵
    Strindelius, L., M. Filler, and I. Sjoholm. 2004. Mucosal immunization with purified flagellin from Salmonella induces systemic and mucosal immune responses in C3H/HeJ mice. Vaccine22:3797-3808.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  39. 39.↵
    Takahashi, A., A. Wada, K. Ogushi, K. Maeda, T. Kawahara, K. Mawatari, H. Kurazono, J. Moss, T. Hirayama, and Y. Nakaya. 2001. Production of beta-defensin-2 by human colonic epithelial cells induced by Salmonella enteritidis flagella filament structural protein. FEBS Lett.508:484-488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 40.↵
    Tallant, T., A. Deb, N. Kar, J. Lupica, M. J. de Veer, and J. A. DiDonato. 2004. Flagellin acting via TLR5 is the major activator of key signaling pathways leading to NF-κB and proinflammatory gene program activation in intestinal epithelial cells. BMC Microbiol.4:33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    van Asten, A. J., K. A. Zwaagstra, M. F. Baay, J. G. Kusters, J. H. Huis in't Veld, and B. A. van der Zeijst. 1995. Identification of the domain which determines the g,m serotype of the flagellin of Salmonella enteritidis. J. Bacteriol.177:1610-1613.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Van Asten, F. J., H. G. Hendriks, J. F. Koninkx, B. A. Van der Zeijst, and W. Gaastra. 2000. Inactivation of the flagellin gene of Salmonella enterica serotype Enteritidis strongly reduces invasion into differentiated Caco-2 cells. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.185:175-179.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Van Immerseel, F., J. De Buck, I. De Smet, F. Pasmans, F. Haesebrouck, and R. Ducatelle. 2004. Interactions of butyric acid- and acetic acid-treated Salmonella with chicken primary cecal epithelial cells in vitro. Avian Dis.48:384-391.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    van Zijderveld, F. G., A. M. Zijderveld-van Bemmel, and J. Anakotta. 1992. Comparison of four different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for serological diagnosis of Salmonella enteritidis infections in experimentally infected chickens. J. Clin. Microbiol.30:2560-2566.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.↵
    Vijay-Kumar, M., H. Wu, R. Jones, G. Grant, B. Babbin, T. P. King, D. Kelly, A. T. Gewirtz, and A. S. Neish. 2006. Flagellin suppresses epithelial apoptosis and limits disease during enteric infection. Am. J. Pathol.169:1686-1700.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    Wang, J. Y., M. F. Pasetti, F. R. Noriega, R. J. Anderson, S. S. Wasserman, J. E. Galen, M. B. Sztein, and M. M. Levine. 2001. Construction, genotypic and phenotypic characterization, and immunogenicity of attenuated ΔguaBA Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strain CVD 915. Infect. Immun.69:4734-4741.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Zalkin, H., and P. Nygaard. 1996. Biosynthesis of purine nucleotides, p. 561-579. In F. C. Neidhardt, R. Curtiss III, J. L. Ingraham, E. C. C. Lin, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, W. S. Reznikoff, M. Riley, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
  48. 48.↵
    Zeng, H., A. Q. Carlson, Y. Guo, Y. Yu, L. S., J. L. Madara, A. T. Gewirtz, and A. S. Neish. 2003. Flagellin is the major proinflammatory determinant of enteropathogenic Salmonella. J. Immunol.171:3668-3674.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. 49.↵
    Zeng, H., H. Wu, V. Sloane, R. Jones, Y. Yu, P. Lin, A. T. Gewirtz, and A. S. Neish. 2006. Flagellin/TLR5 responses in epithelia reveal intertwined activation of inflammatory and apoptotic pathways. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.290:G96-G108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
A Live Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Vaccine Allows Serological Differentiation between Vaccinated and Infected Animals
Connie Adriaensen, Henri De Greve, Jean Q. Tian, Stéphane De Craeye, Eline Gubbels, Venessa Eeckhaut, Filip Van Immerseel, Richard Ducatelle, Mahesh Kumar, Jean-Pierre Hernalsteens
Infection and Immunity Apr 2007, 75 (5) 2461-2468; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01357-06

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Live Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Vaccine Allows Serological Differentiation between Vaccinated and Infected Animals
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Live Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Vaccine Allows Serological Differentiation between Vaccinated and Infected Animals
Connie Adriaensen, Henri De Greve, Jean Q. Tian, Stéphane De Craeye, Eline Gubbels, Venessa Eeckhaut, Filip Van Immerseel, Richard Ducatelle, Mahesh Kumar, Jean-Pierre Hernalsteens
Infection and Immunity Apr 2007, 75 (5) 2461-2468; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01357-06
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Poultry Diseases
Salmonella Infections, Animal
Salmonella Vaccines
Salmonella enteritidis
Vaccines, Attenuated

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522