Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Molecular Pathogenesis

Staphylococcus epidermidis saeR Is an Effector of Anaerobic Growth and a Mediator of Acute Inflammation

L. D. Handke, K. L. Rogers, M. E. Olson, G. A. Somerville, T. J. Jerrells, M. E. Rupp, P. M. Dunman, P. D. Fey
L. D. Handke
1Departments of Pathology and Microbiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. L. Rogers
1Departments of Pathology and Microbiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. E. Olson
1Departments of Pathology and Microbiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. A. Somerville
3Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. J. Jerrells
1Departments of Pathology and Microbiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. E. Rupp
1Departments of Pathology and Microbiology
2Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. M. Dunman
1Departments of Pathology and Microbiology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. D. Fey
1Departments of Pathology and Microbiology
2Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pfey@unmc.edu
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00556-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The saeRS two-component regulatory system regulates transcription of multiple virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus. In the present study, we demonstrated that the saePQRS region in Staphylococcus epidermidis is transcriptionally regulated in a temporal manner and is arranged in a manner similar to that previously described for S. aureus. Studies using a mouse foreign body infection model demonstrated that the virulence of strain 1457 and the virulence of a mutant, strain 1457 saeR, were statistically equivalent. However, histological analyses suggested that the polymorphonuclear neutrophil response at 2 days postinfection was significantly greater in 1457-infected mice than in 1457 saeR-infected mice, demonstrating that SaeR influences the early, acute phases of infection. Microarray analysis demonstrated that a saeR mutation affected the transcription of 65 genes (37 genes were upregulated and 28 genes were downregulated); in particular, 8 genes that facilitate growth under anaerobic conditions were downregulated in 1457 saeR. Analysis of growth under anaerobic conditions demonstrated that 1457 saeR had a decreased growth rate compared to 1457. Further metabolic experiments demonstrated that 1457 saeR had a reduced capacity to utilize nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor and exhibited increased production of lactic acid in comparison to 1457. These data suggest that in S. epidermidis SaeR functions to regulate the transition between aerobic growth and anaerobic growth. In addition, when grown anaerobically, 1457 saeR appeared to compensate for the redox imbalance created by the lack of electron transport-mediated oxidation of NADH to NAD+ by increasing lactate dehydrogenase activity and the subsequent oxidation of NADH.

Prokaryotic two-component regulatory systems modulate gene expression in response to different environmental signals. Analyses of the available Staphylococcus aureus genomes have revealed that S. aureus encodes 16 putative two-component regulatory systems (14), 6 of which have been characterized (3, 10, 13, 31, 36, 43, 53). One two-component regulatory system, encoded by saeRS, was originally identified as a transposon mutant system deficient in the synthesis of several exoproteins, including α- and β-hemolysin, and coagulase (21). SaeRS has subsequently been shown to regulate staphylococcal immune evasion proteins (48), adhesins (26), and γ-hemolysin (58). Importantly, sae inactivation reduces invasion of S. aureus in several animal models and cell lines (20, 35, 52, 57).

The sae operon in S. aureus is comprised of four genes, saePQRS, with saeR encoding the response regulator and saeS encoding the sensor kinase (18). The functions of SaeP and SaeQ are unknown, but it has been postulated that they have important roles in sae-dependent regulation (44, 52). Transcriptional studies revealed that the sae genes in S. aureus are translated from three or four different transcripts and that saeRS is present in three of these transcripts (44, 47, 52). Transcription of the sae mRNAs is growth phase dependent, activated by agr (19, 44, 52), and regulated by SaeR autoactivation (44). Although several environmental conditions affect sae expression, including low pH, salt, glucose, or subinhibitory concentrations of antibiotics (44), the specific activating signal remains unknown.

In this work, we demonstrated that the sae locus is present in the closely related, opportunistic pathogen Staphylococcus epidermidis, the preeminent cause of biomaterial-related infections in hospital settings. In contrast to S. aureus, which produces a large array of toxins and adherence factors, S. epidermidis produces very few virulence factors. Of the virulence factors that have been described (32, 54, 60, 61), a major virulence mechanism associated with S. epidermidis is its ability to form a biofilm, which is largely composed of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) (38). PIA, which is synthesized by enzymes encoded in the four-gene icaADBC operon (27), dramatically reduces the effectiveness of antibiotics and the host immune system (55, 56). Importantly, S. epidermidis icaADBC operon mutants are less virulent in animal models of biomaterial infection (49, 50). SaeRS is required for transcription of several virulence genes in S. aureus, which led us to speculate that the SaeRS system has a similar function in S. epidermidis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in study.Bacterial strains and plasmid constructs used in the current study are listed in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Bacterial strains, bacteriophage, and plasmids used in the current study

Culture media and conditions.Staphylococcal strains were cultured on tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Difco, Detroit, MI) or in tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Difco) at 37°C except where indicated otherwise. Luria-Bertani Miller broth or agar (Difco) was used to propagate Escherichia coli strain DH5α. Antibiotics and medium additives were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO) and used at the following concentrations: ampicillin, 50 μg/ml; erythromycin, 10 μg/ml for staphylococci and 500 μg/ml for E. coli; trimethoprim, 10 μg/ml; and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside (X-Gal), 50 μg/ml. Aerobic growth studies of strains 1457 and 1457 saeR were performed by diluting overnight cultures 1/200 (normalized for growth) into TSB, which was incubated at 37°C at 225 rpm with a flask-to-volume ratio of 10:1. Anaerobic growth studies were performed by diluting an overnight culture (grown in prereduced TSB) 1/50 in TSB containing 3 mg/liter resazurin (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium), 1.0 g/liter l-cysteine hydrochloride monohydrate (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH), and 3 mM potassium nitrate (Sigma). Growth was monitored in an anaerobic chamber (model 1029; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) at 37°C.

Molecular analyses and assembly of saeR allelic replacement vectors.PCR primers for amplification of saePQRS from S. epidermidis 1457 were designed using the genome sequence of S. epidermidis RP62A (GenBank accession number CP000029.) The cloning host for the saeR allelic replacement experiments was E. coli DH5α (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). First, a 965-bp piece of DNA encompassing saeQ and the 5′ end of saeR was amplified using forward primer 373 (5′-GGAATTCGAAAGAGAGTGTTAATCATGAAG-3′) and reverse primer 374 (5′-CGGGATCCGAAGCAAGATACCATAGCAATTC-3′) (Fig. 1). Primers 373 and 374 contained EcoRI and BamHI restriction sites, respectively (underlined). This piece of DNA was subsequently ligated to the EcoRI and BamHI sites of pUC19 (59), which was renamed pNF30. Next, a 949-bp piece of DNA encompassing the 3′ end of saeR and the 5′ end of saeS was amplified using forward primer 359 (5′-ACGCGTCGACCCCTACACTATTACAACTGTG-3′) and reverse primer 360 (5′-AACTGCAGCTAAACGTTCTTTCAAAGATACG-3′) (Fig. 1). Primers 359 and 360 contained SalI and PstI sites, respectively (underlined). This piece of DNA was subsequently ligated into the SalI and PstI sites of pNF30, which was then called pNF32. dhfr, encoding trimethoprim resistance, was excised from pGO558 using SalI and cloned into the SalI site of pNF32, yielding pNF34. Finally, pROJ6448 (46), a temperature-sensitive derivative of pE194 (28), was ligated into the PstI site of pNF34, yielding pNF38.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Comparison of sae nucleotide and protein sequences from S. aureus Newman (GenBank accession number AJ556794) and S. epidermidis RP62A. The DNA identity percentages indicate the level of nucleotide sequence identity for each of the sae genes, as well as the saePQ intergenic region. Percentages of amino acid (AA) identity are also indicated. The positions of primers 373, 374, 359, and 360 (see text) are indicated by arrows. sae transcripts, as defined by Novick and Jiang (44) and Steinhuber et al. (52), are labeled A, B, C, and D.

pNF38 was subsequently electroporated into RN4220, a restriction-deficient, modification-proficient strain of S. aureus (34), using previously described protocols (51). Modified pNF38 DNA was isolated from RN4220 using a Wizard plus MidiPrep kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and subsequently electroporated into S. epidermidis 1457 (39) using the electroporation protocol developed by Augustin and Götz (4). To detect chromosomal integration of pNF38 into saeR, strain 1457 containing pNF38 was grown to mid-exponential phase in 10 ml TSB (Difco, Sparks, MD) containing 10 μg/ml erythromycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 30°C. The culture was then diluted 1:100 in fresh TSB (100 ml) and was incubated at 43°C (nonpermissive temperature) overnight with shaking at 100 rpm. This step was repeated the following day. The culture was then plated (with incubation at 43°C) onto TSA containing trimethoprim (10 μg/ml; Sigma) and replica plated onto TSA containing 10 μg/ml erythromycin to count colonies that were trimethoprim resistant and erythromycin susceptible (i.e., colonies with double recombination in saeR and subsequent loss of erythromycin resistance). Following confirmation of gene knockouts by PCR and Southern blot hybridization, knockout alleles were backcrossed into wild-type S. epidermidis 1457 using transducing phage 71, as described previously (40). The allelic replacement of saeR with dhfr resulted in the loss of 134 bp.

Mouse foreign body infection model.The mouse foreign body infection model was used to evaluate the virulence of S. epidermidis 1457 and 1457 saeR (50). Both strains were inoculated into 100 ml TSB and were incubated for 16 h at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation and suspended in sterile saline (0.9% NaCl) to obtain concentrations of 1 × 107, 1 × 108, and 1 × 109 CFU/ml. Following ketamine/xylazine administration, the skin on an animal's back and flank was shaved with surgical clippers and disinfected with povidone-iodine. One-centimeter catheter segments (Jelco 16G FEP catheter; Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) were implanted into the subcutaneous space in 25- to 30-g male Swiss-Webster mice. One hundred microliters of saline (0.9%) containing either 106, 107, or 108 CFU of 1457 or 1457 saeR was inoculated into the flank of each mouse containing an implanted catheter. The mice were housed for 7 days with unrestricted access to water and rodent diet. Animals were euthanized by carbon dioxide inhalation, and the catheters were explanted.

To obtain S. epidermidis cell counts, the catheter was first removed from a mouse flank and placed into 1 ml of saline. Next, a standardized amount or pericatheter tissue, excluding the overlying cutaneous tissue, was removed from the animal and placed into 1 ml of saline. Both samples were mixed with a vortex mixer to dislodge adherent cells, and the cells were enumerated after dilution and plating on TSA. Tissue sample results were standardized by determining the number of cells per gram of tissue. A statistical analysis (Mann-Whitney test) was performed with GraphPad Prism version 4.03 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

Tissues used for histological examination were harvested at 2 and 7 days postinfection and were stored in 10% formalin. Embedding, cutting, and eosin and hematoxylin staining of these tissues were performed by the Eppley Histology Core Laboratory at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. For enumeration of the mononuclear cell populations at the site of infection, tissue from the catheterized site was collected at 2 and 7 days postinfection and was placed in a 15-ml conical centrifuge tube containing 10 ml RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Mediatech, Herndon, VA), 400 IU/ml collagenase IV, and 30 μg/ml DNase I (Sigma). Tissue was placed on a GyroMini nutating mixer (Labnet, Edison, NJ) and incubated at 37°C for 2 h. To obtain a suspension of single cells, tissue was passed through a stainless steel mesh, and the entire cell fraction was centrifuged at 300 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Cells were washed in phosphate-buffered saline, and the pellet was resuspended in Hanks balanced salt solution (Mediatech, Herndon, VA). The mononuclear cell population was enriched by using a density gradient (Lympholyte-M; Cedarlane Labs, Burlington, Canada) as directed by the manufacturer. Briefly, the cell pellet was suspended in 5 ml Hanks balanced salt solution, underlaid with 5 ml Lympholyte-M, and centrifuged at 1,000 × g for 20 min at room temperature. Dead cells and red blood cells were pelleted, and mononuclear cells were collected at the interface. Cytocentrifuge preparations of the isolated mononuclear cell populations were obtained with a Cytopro 7620 (Wescor, Logan, UT). Differential cell counts were obtained by staining slides with a Diff-Quick kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) as directed by the manufacturer. A minimum of 200 cells per slide were counted.

RNA isolation and Northern analysis.Cultures of S. epidermidis 1457 were grown overnight in TSB, diluted 1:200 into fresh TSB (flask-to-volume ratio, 5:1; shaking at 200 rpm [microaerobic conditions]), and grown at 37°C to optical densities at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.25 (early exponential growth), 3.0 (mid-exponential growth), and 8.2 (late exponential growth). RNA was then isolated as described by Luong et al. (37). The following primer sets were used to amplify regions of the sae locus that were used as DNA probes for the Northern blots: for saeP (379 bp), forward primer AGCGCCACCAAAAATTACAT and reverse primer TTACATTAGGCGCATGTGGA; and for saeS (285 bp), forward primer CGATTGGAGGTCGATACTGG and reverse primer TCTGAAGGTTTACGGGATGG. DNA probes were labeled using digoxigenin-labeled dUTP (Roche, Indianapolis, IN).

Transcriptional profiling.Overnight cultures of S. epidermidis 1457 and 1457 saeR were diluted 1:100 into fresh TSB and grown at 37°C to an OD600 of 2.7 (flask-to-volume ratio, 5:1; shaking at 200 rpm [microaerobic conditions]). RNA was converted to cDNA, and microarray analysis was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (Affymetrix expression analysis technical manual; Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA) for antisense prokaryotic arrays essentially as described previously by Beenken and colleagues (7). To ensure reproducibility, two cDNA samples from each strain were prepared from two separate experiments. Each cDNA sample was hybridized to an S. epidermidis GeneChip. Signal intensity values for each qualifier (predicted open reading frame [ORF] and intergenic region) were normalized to the median signal intensity value for each GeneChip. Sample values were then averaged. Genes for which there was at least a twofold difference (P ≤0.05, t test) in RNA titer between 1457 and 1457 saeR were considered differentially expressed in a saeR-dependent manner.

Reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) was used to confirm the microarray data for genes involved in anaerobic metabolism (Table 2). RNA was isolated as described above, and 10 ng was used in each reaction mixture. A One Tube RT-PCR kit (Roche Diagnostics) was used according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Oligonucleotides used for detection of specific genes are listed in Table 2. All reactions were allowed to proceed for 22 cycles with an annealing temperature of 50°C. gyrA was used as an internal standard as described previously by Conlon et al. (16). Amplified products were visualized on a 1.5% agarose (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) gel. Five of the seven genes (SE214, SE1977, SE2170, SE2171, and SE2172) were further confirmed by Northern blot analysis. Primer sets described in Table 2 were used to amplify regions of each gene that were used as DNA probes.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

RT-PCR primers

Biofilm and PIA assay.Assays for the production of biofilm were performed using the method of Christensen et al. (15). Cells for PIA immunoblot assays were cultured in TSB overnight with shaking. The next day, cells were diluted 1:100 into TSB and grown to an OD600 of 1.0. Cell extracts from 3 × 108 CFU were prepared, spotted on 0.45-μm-pore-size polyvinylidene difluoride (Immobilon-P; Millipore, Bedford, MA) membranes, and developed as previously described (17). The anti-PIA antibody used in these assays was diluted 1:250,000 (the antibody was a kind gift from D. Mack).

Metabolic analyses.Both 1457 and 1457 saeR were grown anaerobically in TSB as described above. Nitrate and lactic acid in the culture medium (TSB; after centrifugation and collection of the supernatant) were quantified using an R-Biopharm metabolic assay kit (R-Biopharm, Marshall, MI). Nitrite in the culture medium was quantified using the Griess reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

RESULTS

sae is present in S. epidermidis.BLAST searches (1) performed with the sequences of saeR and saeS from S. aureus strain Newman (GenBank accession number AJ556795 [52]) indicated that genes encoding SaeR and SaeS homologs were present in the genomes of S. epidermidis strains RP62A and ATCC 12228 (GenBank accession numbers CP000029 and AE015929, respectively.) In addition, two ORFs (annotated as SERP0367 and SERP0366 in the RP62A genome sequence and as SE_0481 and SE_0480 in the ATCC 12228 genome sequence) were found upstream of saeR. Comparison of the S. epidermidis genomic sequence data with the S. aureus strain Newman genome indicated that the farthest upstream of these ORFs shared 74% nucleotide sequence identity with S. aureus saeP (designated ORF4) (Fig. 1). Similarly, saeQ from Newman (designated ORF3) shared 75% nucleotide identity with the second ORF in S. epidermidis 1457. The saeR and saeS genes were also similar in the two species, sharing 75 and 67% nucleotide identity, respectively. As a result, we designated the farthest upstream gene in S. epidermidis 1457 saeP and the second gene saeQ (per Novick and Jiang [44]). Primers designed using the S. epidermidis RP62A genome sequence amplified products of the appropriate size (from saeP, saeQ, saeR, and saeS) from S. epidermidis 1457 (data not shown) (39). Therefore, S. epidermidis 1457 was used in further studies as it is amenable to genetic manipulation (25).

Transcriptional analysis of the saePQRS region.Previous Northern blot analysis of S. aureus saePQRS demonstrated that this region was comprised of four transcriptional units, transcripts A, B, C, and D (44, 52) (Fig. 1). Transcript A is produced early in the exponential phase of growth, whereas transcripts B, C, and D are transcribed late in the exponential growth phase. The transition from producing transcript A to producing transcripts B, C, and D is under the control of agr (44). Northern blot analysis of S. epidermidis 1457 demonstrated that the transcriptional regulation of the saePQRS region was similar to that in S. aureus. Using saeS as a DNA probe, a single transcript that was approximately 1.7 kb long (corresponding to transcript A) was detected during early exponential growth, whereas two additional transcripts that were approximately 2.1 and 3.0 kb long (corresponding to transcripts B and C) were detected later in the exponential growth phase (Fig. 2). In contrast to the results for S. aureus, using saeP as a probe, a smaller 0.5-kb transcript corresponding to transcript D was never detected at any phase of growth (Fig. 1) (data not shown).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Northern blot analysis of the sae operon hybridized with a saeS DNA probe. (A) RNA isolated from 1457 at the following times: lane 1, early exponential growth (OD600, 0.25); lane 2, 1457 mid-exponential growth (OD600, 3.0); lane 3, late exponential growth (OD600, 8.2). The arrows indicate the positions of transcripts A, B, and C as discussed in text. (B) RNA gel hybridized with saeS in panel A. Note the equal loading of RNA based on 16S-23S rRNA ethidium bromide staining intensity.

Construction and characterization of a saeR mutant in S. epidermidis.Because sae has been shown to be a regulator of virulence in S. aureus, we speculated that sae controls virulence factor expression in S. epidermidis. To test this possibility, we constructed a sae mutant strain of S. epidermidis 1457 by insertion of the dhfr gene into the predicted effector domain of saeR. Following plasmid integration and vector excision by secondary recombination, disruption of saeR was confirmed by PCR and Southern blot hybridization (data not shown). To ensure that observations made with this mutant strain were due to sae interruption and not due to secondary mutations in other genes, the disrupted saeR allele was backcrossed into wild-type strain 1457 with phage 71. Similar to the results for S. aureus, disruption of saeR did not result in a significant aerobic growth defect (Fig. 3).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Comparison of growth of 1457 (WT) and 1457 saeR.

In contrast to S. aureus, biofilm formation is the primary virulence mechanism in S. epidermidis; hence, we assessed the effect of saeR inactivation on biofilm formation. Average A650 values from six biofilm assays indicated that the saeR mutant produced slightly more biofilm than its wild-type counterpart (A650, 2.19 versus 1.90). As expected, two negative control strains, strains 1457 ica (25) and ica-negative Staphylococcus carnosus strain TM300 (24), failed to produce biofilm (A650, 0.33 and 0.28, respectively.) PIA immunoblots indicated that the levels of PIA production were equivalent in 1457 and 1457 saeR (data not shown).

Virulence of an S. epidermidis saeR mutant in a mouse foreign body infection model.Animal models of infection have demonstrated that sae is required for virulence of S. aureus (5, 8, 20, 22, 23, 57); therefore, we hypothesized that loss of SaeR in S. epidermidis would result in a decrease in virulence. To examine this hypothesis, wild-type strain 1457 and its isogenic saeR mutant were compared using the mouse foreign body infection model. For these experiments, infectious doses of 106, 107, and 108 bacteria were inoculated into catheter segments implanted in the subcutaneous space of mice. The number of catheters analyzed for each inoculum was as follows: for 106 CFU of 1457 and 1457 saeR, 16 catheters each; for 107 CFU of 1457 and 1457 saeR, 15 catheters each; and for 108 CFU of 1457 and 1457 saeR, 16 catheters each. Catheters were explanted 7 days postinfection, and the numbers of S. epidermidis cells associated with the catheters were determined following dilution and plating. The numbers of bacteria isolated from the catheters inoculated with strain 1457 and the numbers of bacteria isolated from the catheters inoculated with strain 1457 saeR were statistically equivalent for all infectious doses (Fig. 4A) (for 106 CFU, P = 0.24; for 107 CFU, P = 1.00; for 108 CFU, P = 0.21). In addition, tissues directly surrounding the catheters were explanted, and the numbers of bacteria associated with these tissues were also determined. Similar to the bacterial loads on the catheters, the numbers of bacteria per gram of tissue were equivalent for strains 1457 and 1457 saeR for each inoculum (Fig. 4B) (for 106 CFU, P = 0.63; for 107 CFU, P = 0.06; for 108 CFU, P = 0.40). Taken together, these data demonstrate that S. epidermidis can establish an infection independent of SaeR.

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Animal studies with 1457 and 1457 saeR. (A) Numbers of cells obtained from catheters inoculated with 1457 and 1457 saeR. The mean values are indicated by bars. The numbers of data points where no bacteria were detected in the samples are indicated above the arrows. (B) Numbers of cells obtained from tissues surrounding catheters inoculated with 1457 and 1457 saeR. The mean values are indicated by bars. The numbers of data points where no bacteria were detected in the samples are indicated above the arrows.

Despite the in vivo growth similarities of the wild-type and saeR mutant strains, we chose to perform a more thorough histological examination of catheter beds to determine if saeR inactivation affected the host response. Indeed, differences in the number of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) present at the site of infection were observed for wild-type and saeR mutant cells (Fig. 5A and 5B). Eosin and hematoxylin staining of the tissues revealed that darkly staining immune cells were more prevalent adjacent to catheters infected with wild-type strain 1457. Specifically, 2 days after infection, the proportion of cells with morphological characteristics consistent with those of PMNs was higher in the 1457-infected mice (49.3% ± 3%) than in the 1457 saeR-infected mice (26.7% ± 3%) (P < 0.05). The numbers of PMNs were similar for the two groups of mice after 7 days of infection (P ≥ 0.05) (data not shown). These data demonstrate that SaeR directly or indirectly influences the early, acute phase(s) of an infection.

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

Hematoxylin- and eosin-stained tissues surrounding catheters infected with 1457 (A) or 1457 saeR (B). Note the darkly staining granulocytes in catheter beds (indicated by an arrow) in 1457 (A) compared to 1457 saeR (B).

Transcriptional profiling.To ascertain possible causes of the alteration in the innate immune response to S. epidermidis with saeR inactivated, we performed a transcriptional profile analysis of the wild-type and saeR mutant strains. We determined that 65 genes were affected by SaeR (37 genes were upregulated and 28 genes were downregulated) (Table 3). In contrast to the findings for S. aureus, in which the large majority of the genes regulated by SaeR code for extracellular toxins and cellular adherence factors (35, 47), genes affected by the loss of SaeR in S. epidermidis had multiple functions, including pyruvate metabolism (e.g., pflA, pflB, ackA, and butA), amino acid synthesis and metabolism (e.g., hisG, hisD, hisH, argG, argJ, and argC), and redox regulation (putative REX regulator, trxA, and trxB). In a comparison to microarray analyses of three S. aureus strains (COL, Newman, and WCUH29), only four genes were identified in S. epidermidis that were also regulated by saeR in S. aureus (35, 47). These four genes were geh (lipase), esp (S. epidermidis)/sspA (S. aureus) (V8 protease), lrgA (holin protein), and the gene encoding a LysM/CHAP domain protein. Interestingly, geh was negatively regulated by saeR in S. epidermidis, but it is positively regulated in S. aureus. Of particular interest were a number of genes that were positively regulated by SaeR that may facilitate growth under anaerobic conditions. These genes included the genes encoding the putative NADH:flavin oxidoreductase/fumarate reductase (SE0195), the putative C-4 dicarboxylate anaerobic carrier (SE0227), complex I NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (snoG; SE0640), assimilatory nitrite reductase (nasE; SE1977), the putative anaerobic C-4 dicarboxylate transporter (SE2170), the putative anaerobic ribonucleoside reductase activator (SE2171), and the class III anaerobic reductase (nrdD; SE2172). Due to the close proximity of the SE2170, SE2171, and SE2172 genes, these genes may be members of an operon. Taken together, these data led us to speculate that SaeRS may be involved in sensing and responding to anaerobiosis. RT-PCR was used to confirm that expression of eight genes (SE1977, SE2170, SE2171, SE2172, SE0640, SE0227, SE0214, and SE0215 [Tables 2 and 3]) possibly involved in anaerobic growth was indeed downregulated in 1457 saeR compared to 1457 (Fig. 6). As shown in Fig. 6, we were unable to consistently demonstrate that expression of two of the genes identified by microarray analysis (SE0640 or snoG [Fig. 6A, lanes 11 and 12] and SE0227 [Fig. 6A, lanes 13 and 14]) was indeed downregulated in 1457 saeR. As the proteins encoded by both of these genes presumably function under anaerobic conditions, the inconsistency in expression levels may be related to variable oxygen tensions in repeat microaerobic cultures. The expression of all other genes tested was indeed downregulated in 1457 saeR compared to 1457 as assessed by RT-PCR (Fig. 6A) or Northern analysis (Fig. 6B).

FIG. 6.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 6.

(A) RT-PCR of genes involved in anaerobic growth for confirmation of transcriptional profiling. Lanes 1 and 2, 1457 (lane 1) and 1457 saeR (lane 2) amplified with primers 1285 and 1286 (SE1977); lanes 3 and 4, 1457 (lane 3) and 1457 saeR (lane 4) amplified with primers 1287 and 1288 (SE2170); lanes 5 and 6, 1457 (lane 5) and 1457 saeR (lane 6) amplified with primers 1289 and 1290 (SE2171); lanes 7 and 8, 1457 (lane 7) and 1457 saeR (lane 8) amplified with primers 1291 and 1292 (SE2172); lanes 9 and 10, 1457 (lane 9) and 1457 saeR (lane 10) amplified with primers 5 and 6 (gyrA); lanes 11 and 12, 1457 (lane 11) and 1457 saeR (lane 12) amplified with primers 1293 and 1294 (SE0640); lanes 13 and 14, 1457 (lane 13) and 1457 saeR (lane 14) amplified with primers 1295 and 1296 (SE0227); lanes 15 and 16, 1457 (lane 15) and 1457 saeR (lane 16) amplified with primers 1297 and 1298 (SE0214); lanes 17 and 18, 1457 (lane 17) and 1457 saeR (lane 18) amplified with primers 1299 and 1300 (SE0215). (B) Northern blot analysis of genes involved in anaerobic growth. Lanes 1 and 2, 1457 (lane 1) and 1457 saeR (lane 2) hybridized with an SE2170 DNA probe; lanes 3 and 4, 1457 (lane 3) and 1457 saeR (lane 4) hybridized with an SE2171 DNA probe; lanes 5 and 6, 1457 (lane 5) and 1457 saeR (lane 6) hybridized with an SE1977 DNA probe; lanes 7 and 8, 1457 (lane 7) and 1457 saeR (lane 8) hybridized with an SE2172 DNA probe; lanes 9 and 10, 1457 (lane 9) and 1457 saeR (lane 10) hybridized with an SE0214 DNA probe. (C) RNA gel hybridized with various probes described above for panel B. Note the equal loading of RNA based on 16S-23S rRNA ethidium bromide staining intensity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Microarray analysis of wild-type strain S. epidermidis 1457 compared to strain 1457 saeR

Growth of 1457 and 1457 saeR under anoxic growth conditions.To assess if SaeR alters anaerobic physiology, strains 1457 and 1457 saeR were grown at 37°C in an anaerobic chamber, and the growth was monitored. As expected, the results demonstrated that 1457 saeR had a lower growth rate than 1457, although the growth yields were similar (Fig. 7A).

FIG. 7.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 7.

(A) Effect of anaerobiosis on growth of 1457 (▪), 1457 saeR (□), and 1457 saeR/pNF115 (▴). The results are representative of three separate experiments. (B) Production of nitrite by 1457 (▴) and 1457 saeR (▵) superimposed on curves showing the utilization of nitrate by 1457 (▪) and 1457 saeR (□). (C) Production of lactic acid by 1457 (▴) and 1457 saeR (▵) superimposed on curves showing the pH values of the 1457 growth medium (▪) and the 1457 saeR growth medium (□). The data in panels B and C are representative of five separate experiments.

Staphylococci can use nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor under anoxic conditions (11, 12, 41, 45). Since snoG is postulated to be an important oxidoreductase that is linked to nitrate reductase activity in electron transport (6), we hypothesized that the growth defect detected in 1457 saeR is due to a decreased ability to utilize nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor. To test this possibility, strains 1457 and 1457 saeR were grown anaerobically in TSB supplemented with 3 mM potassium nitrate. The results demonstrated that 1457 depleted the nitrate in the culture medium; however, strain 1457 saeR had a significantly reduced rate of nitrate utilization (Fig. 7B). Strain 1457 exhausted the nitrate in the culture medium by 30 h after the beginning of of growth; however, strain 1457 saeR never depleted the nitrate. Furthermore, after 39 h of growth, when the OD600 of 1457 and 1457 saeR were similar, there was still approximately 2.3 mM nitrate left in the culture supernatant of 1457 saeR, whereas no nitrate was detected in the culture supernatant of 1457. Anaerobiosis reduces nitrate to nitrite; therefore, our data demonstrating that nitrate utilization was significantly decreased in strain 1457 saeR compared to 1457 led us to speculate that the accumulation of nitrite in the culture medium would be greater in 1457 cultures than in 1457 saeR cultures (41). As predicted, nitrite began accumulating coincident with a decrease in the nitrate concentration in the 1457 culture medium. In contrast, the concentration of nitrite in the culture medium of 1457 saeR was at the detection limit of the assay (Fig. 7B). Consistent with previous observations, nitrite was extracted from the culture medium only after the concentration of nitrate became limited (41) (Fig. 7B).

The impaired anaerobic growth of strain 1457 saeR results in decreased utilization of nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor. This situation can affect redox homeostasis by limiting the ability of the bacterium to oxidize NADH to NAD+. We hypothesized that to compensate for the lack of electron transport-mediated oxidation of NADH, more pyruvate would be shunted through lactate dehydrogenase and result in increased lactic acid accumulation in the culture medium of strain1457 saeR. Increasing lactate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.27) activity would help mitigate a redox imbalance by coupling the dismutation of pyruvate to lactic acid with the oxidation of NADH to NAD+. As predicted, the pH minimum of the 1457 saeR growth medium was significantly lower than the pH minimum of the 1457 culture medium (Fig. 7C), suggesting that more organic acids were produced by 1457 saeR than by 1457. Consistent with the pH data, we found a higher concentration of lactic acid in the culture medium of strain 1457 saeR than in the culture medium of the isogenic wild-type strain (Fig. 7C). Collectively, these data suggest that the decreased pH observed in the 1457 saeR culture medium was due to increased production of lactic acid.

Complementation of 1457 saeR with pNF155.1457 saeR/pNF155, which contained full-length saeRS on a multicopy plasmid, partially complemented the growth defect observed in 1457 saeR grown under anoxic conditions (Fig. 7A). Consistent with these data, pNF155 did not completely restore 1457 saeR to the 1457 phenotype with regard to nitrate utilization and lactic acid production. For instance, after 39 h of growth, 1.0 mM nitrate and 11.2 mM lactic acid (mean concentrations) remained in the culture supernatant of 1457 saeR/pNF115 (n = 3; data not shown).

DISCUSSION

The sae two-component regulatory system in S. aureus has emerged as an important regulator of virulence. The research described here is the first step in characterization of the sae operon in S. epidermidis and the first attempt to identify the environmental conditions that modulate the regulatory response of sae. The S. epidermidis sae operon was found to be organized in a manner similar to the S. aureus operon. Each gene in strain RP62A was found to share at least 67% nucleotide identity to a gene from S. aureus strain Newman, and each protein was found to share at least 75% amino acid identity. In addition, Northern analysis demonstrated that the transcriptional regulation of sae in S. epidermidis strain 1457 was similar to that in S. aureus (44, 47, 52) (Fig. 1). Relative to S. aureus, S. epidermidis has very few defined virulence factors. Of the known virulence factors and mechanisms in S. epidermidis, the most extensively studied are the production of PIA/biofilm and the poly-γ-dl-glutamic acid capsule (32, 49, 50). Our data demonstrate that transcription of the genes encoding these virulence factors occurs independent of SaeR in S. epidermidis. This observation provided an excellent opportunity to examine the physiological function of sae in S. epidermidis. Nevertheless, since there is a clear association between virulence and the sae operon in S. aureus, we utilized a mouse foreign body infection model, a highly pertinent model of S. epidermidis-mediated infection, to determine the level of virulence of the saeR mutant compared to that of the wild type. Furthermore, this model has been used to demonstrate differences in the virulence of strains that produce similar amounts of PIA/biofilm (32). Interestingly, even though strains 1457 and 1457 saeR were equally able to establish an infection in the mouse foreign body infection model, the host responses to these two strains differed dramatically (Fig. 5A and 5B). At 2 days postinoculation, the PMN response was significantly greater in the tissue of mice infected with 1457 than in the tissue of mice infected with 1457 saeR. Our first inclination was to determine whether SaeR regulates the production of phenol-soluble modulins, which are known immune mediators (54). However, no difference in the production of phenol-soluble modulins was detected between the saeR mutant and the wild type (data not shown). Further studies are needed to determine which immune modulators are regulated by SaeR during the acute phase of infection.

Transcriptional profiling revealed that SaeR affects metabolic processes, including redox activity, pyruvate metabolism, and amino acid synthesis and metabolism; of particular interest were several genes predicted to be involved in anaerobic metabolism. Two of the genes (SE0227 and SE2170) encode putative anaerobic C-4 dicarboxylate transporters, which facilitate transport of alternative electron acceptors (e.g., fumarate or succinate) (29). In addition, a putative NADH:flavin oxidoreductase/fumarate reductase (SE0195) was also positively regulated by SaeR. The class III anaerobic reductase (nrdD; SE2172) is an anaerobic ribonucleotide reductase that catalyzes the formation of DNA from RNA building blocks. NrdD is inactivated by molecular oxygen and appears to be essential for anaerobic growth (30, 42). Lastly, snoG, encoding part of the complex I NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, is important in anaerobic respiration linked to nitrate reduction. Taken together, these data suggest that one function of SaeR is to regulate the transition from aerobic growth to anaerobic growth. The fact that saeR inactivation did not alter aerobic growth but did result in an anaerobic growth impairment strongly supports this suggestion (Fig. 7A).

Glycolysis generates two molecules of pyruvate for every molecule of glucose consumed; however, in the process it reduces two molecules of NAD+ to NADH. Reduction of NAD+ to NADH without an equivalent means to oxidize NADH can create a redox imbalance and inhibit growth. Staphylococci primarily reduce pyruvate to lactic acid during anaerobic growth, a process that regenerates NAD+ (9, 33). Under anaerobic or microaerobic growth conditions, NAD+ can be regenerated from NADH by both the membrane-bound nitrate reductase and the NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase (SnoA-G) (6). However, saeR inactivation decreased transcription of snoG, slowing the utilization of nitrate and likely resulting in the decreased growth rate. To compensate for the redox imbalance, strain 1457 saeR shunts pyruvate into lactate dehydrogenase, a reaction allowing for the stoichiometric oxidation of NADH produced during glycolysis (Fig. 7C). In agreement with these data, microarray analysis demonstrated that transcription of both trxA and trxB is downregulated in the saeR mutant, whereas REX, a redox-responsive regulator, is upregulated in the saeR mutant (Table 3). The result of this compensation by 1457 saeR is a much more acidic extracellular milieu; the consequence of this metabolic switch, especially within a biofilm, is currently being studied in our laboratories.

It is not known why pNF115 is unable to completely restore the wild-type phenotype to 1457 saeR. However, the explanation may be related to the fact that the entire two-component regulator (saeRS) is present on a multicopy plasmid. Unfortunately, unlike the situation in S. aureus, in S. epidermidis there is no genetic system to complement mutants in single copy.

In contrast to S. aureus, our data suggest that in S. epidermidis the sae two-component regulatory system functions to control basic metabolic processes but few of the limited number of virulence genes (i.e., lipase and V8 protease genes). Based on the genomic similarities between S. aureus and S. epidermidis, we speculate that saeRS may function to indirectly regulate virulence gene expression by altering the metabolic status of the bacteria, particularly under conditions in which oxygen availability is low, such as the conditions in a deep abscess or biofilm. This hypothesis is actively being tested in our laboratories.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Public Health Service grant AI49311 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to P.D.F.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 17 April 2007.
    • Returned for modification 22 May 2007.
    • Accepted 14 October 2007.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol.215:403-410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  2. 2.
    Archer, G. L., and J. L. Johnston. 1983. Self-transmissible plasmids in staphylococci that encode resistance to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.24:70-77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Arvidson, S., and K. Tegmark. 2001. Regulation of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus. Int. J. Med. Microbiol.291:159-170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Augustin, J., and F. Götz. 1990. Transformation of Staphylococcus epidermidis and other staphylococcal species with plasmid DNA by electroporation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.54:203-207.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Bae, T., A. K. Banger, A. Wallace, E. M. Glass, F. Aslund, O. Schneewind, and D. M. Missiakas. 2004. Staphylococcus aureus virulence genes identified by bursa aurealis mutagenesis and nematode killing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA101:12312-12317.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Bayer, A. S., P. McNamara, M. R. Yeaman, N. Lucindo, T. Jones, A. L. Cheung, H. G. Sahl, and R. A. Proctor. 2006. Transposon disruption of the complex I NADH oxidoreductase gene (snoD) in Staphylococcus aureus is associated with reduced susceptibility to the microbicidal activity of thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein 1. J. Bacteriol.188:211-222.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Beenken, K. E., P. M. Dunman, F. McAleese, D. Macapagal, E. Murphy, S. J. Projan, J. S. Blevins, and M. S. Smeltzer. 2004. Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J. Bacteriol.186:4665-4684.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Benton, B. M., J. P. Zhang, S. Bond, C. Pope, T. Christian, L. Lee, K. M. Winterberg, M. B. Schmid, and J. M. Buysse. 2004. Large-scale identification of genes required for full virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol.186:8478-8489.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. 9.↵
    Blumenthal, H. J. 1972. Glucose metabolism in staphylococci, p. 111-135. In J. O. Cohen (ed.), The staphylococci. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.
  10. 10.↵
    Bronner, S., H. Monteil, and G. Prevost. 2004. Regulation of virulence determinants in Staphylococcus aureus: complexity and applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev.28:183-200.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Burke, K. A., A. E. Brown, and J. Lascelles. 1981. Membrane and cytoplasmic nitrate reductase of Staphylococcus aureus and application of crossed immunoelectrophoresis. J. Bacteriol.148:724-727.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    Burke, K. A., and J. Lascelles. 1979. Partial purification and some properties of the Staphylococcus aureus cytoplasmic nitrate reductase. J. Bacteriol.139:120-125.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Chen, P. R., T. Bae, W. A. Williams, E. M. Duguid, P. A. Rice, O. Schneewind, and C. He. 2006. An oxidation-sensing mechanism is used by the global regulator MgrA in Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Chem. Biol.2:591-595.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Cheung, A. L., A. S. Bayer, G. Zhang, H. Gresham, and Y. Q. Xiong. 2004. Regulation of virulence determinants in vitro and in vivo in Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.40:1-9.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Christensen, G. D., L. M. Baddour, B. M. Madison, J. T. Parisi, S. N. Abraham, D. L. Hasty, J. H. Lowrance, J. A. Josephs, and W. A. Simpson. 1990. Colonial morphology of staphylococci on memphis agar: phase variation of slime production, resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, and virulence. J. Infect. Dis.161:1153-1169.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Conlon, K. M., H. Humphreys, and J. P. O'Gara. 2002. icaR encodes a transcriptional repressor involved in environmental regulation of ica operon expression and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Bacteriol.184:4400-4408.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Cramton, S. E., M. Ulrich, F. Gotz, and G. Doring. 2001. Anaerobic conditions induce expression of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect. Immun.69:4079-4085.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Giraudo, A. T., A. Calzolari, A. A. Cataldi, C. Bogni, and R. Nagel. 1999. The sae locus of Staphylococcus aureus encodes a two-component regulatory system. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.177:15-22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 19.↵
    Giraudo, A. T., C. Mansilla, A. Chan, C. Raspanti, and R. Nagel. 2003. Studies on the expression of regulatory locus sae in Staphylococcus aureus. Curr. Microbiol.46:246-250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  20. 20.↵
    Giraudo, A. T., H. Rampone, A. Calzolari, and R. Nagel. 1996. Phenotypic characterization and virulence of a sae−agr− mutant of Staphylococcus aureus. Can. J Microbiol.42:120-123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 21.↵
    Giraudo, A. T., C. G. Raspanti, A. Calzolari, and R. Nagel. 1994. Characterization of a Tn551-mutant of Staphylococcus aureus defective in the production of several exoproteins. Can. J. Microbiol.40:677-681.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  22. 22.↵
    Goerke, C., U. Fluckiger, A. Steinhuber, V. Bisanzio, M. Ulrich, M. Bischoff, J. M. Patti, and C. Wolz. 2005. Role of Staphylococcus aureus global regulators sae and σB in virulence gene expression during device-related infection. Infect. Immun.73:3415-3421.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    Goerke, C., U. Fluckiger, A. Steinhuber, W. Zimmerli, and C. Wolz. 2001. Impact of the regulatory loci agr, sarA and sae of Staphylococcus aureus on the induction of alpha-toxin during device-related infection resolved by direct quantitative transcript analysis. Mol. Microbiol.40:1439-1447.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Gotz, F., and B. Schumacher. 1987. Improvements of protoplast transformation in Staphylococcus carnosus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.40:285-288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    Handke, L., S. Slater, K. Conlon, S. O'Donnell, M. Olson, K. Bryant, M. Rupp, J. O'Gara, and P. Fey. 2007. σB and SarA act at the level of icaADBC transcription to regulate PIA production in Staphylococcus epidermidis. Can. J. Microbiol.53:82-91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Harraghy, N., J. Kormanec, C. Wolz, D. Homerova, C. Goerke, K. Ohlsen, S. Qazi, P. Hill, and M. Herrmann. 2005. sae is essential for expression of the staphylococcal adhesins Eap and Emp. Microbiology151:1789-1800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Heilmann, C., O. Schweitzer, C. Gerke, N. Vanittanakom, D. Mack, and F. Gotz. 1996. Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis. Mol. Microbiol.20:1083-1091.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Iordanescu, S. 1976. Three distinct plasmids originating in the same Staphylococcus aureus strain. Arch. Roum. Pathol. Exp. Microbiol.35:111-118.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Janausch, I. G., E. Zientz, Q. H. Tran, A. Kroger, and G. Unden. 2002. C4-dicarboxylate carriers and sensors in bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1553:39-56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Jordan, A., and P. Reichard. 1998. Ribonucleotide reductases. Annu. Rev. Biochem.67:71-98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Kaito, C., K. Kurokawa, Y. Matsumoto, Y. Terao, S. Kawabata, S. Hamada, and K. Sekimizu. 2005. Silkworm pathogenic bacteria infection model for identification of novel virulence genes. Mol. Microbiol.56:934-944.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 32.↵
    Kocianova, S., C. Vuong, Y. Yao, J. M. Voyich, E. R. Fischer, F. R. DeLeo, and M. Otto. 2005. Key role of poly-gamma-dl-glutamic acid in immune evasion and virulence of Staphylococcus epidermidis. J. Clin. Investig.115:688-694.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Krebs, H. A. 1937. Dismutation of pyruvic acid in Gonococcus and Staphylococcus. Biochem. J.31:661-671.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  34. 34.↵
    Kreiswirth, B. N., S. Lofdahl, M. J. Betley, M. O'Reilly, P. M. Schlievert, M. S. Bergdoll, and R. P. Novick. 1983. The toxic shock syndrome exotoxin structural gene is not detectably transmitted by a prophage. Nature305:709-712.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 35.↵
    Liang, X., C. Yu, J. Sun, H. Liu, C. Landwehr, D. Holmes, and Y. Ji. 2006. Inactivation of a two-component signal transduction system, SaeRS, eliminates adherence and attenuates virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun.74:4655-4665.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Lim, Y., M. Jana, T. T. Luong, and C. Y. Lee. 2004. Control of glucose- and NaCl-induced biofilm formation by rbf in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol.186:722-729.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Luong, T. T., P. M. Dunman, E. Murphy, S. J. Projan, and C. Y. Lee. 2006. Transcription profiling of the mgrA regulon in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol.188:1899-1910.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. 38.↵
    Mack, D., M. Haeder, N. Siemssen, and R. Laufs. 1996. Association of biofilm production of coagulase-negative staphylococci with expression of a specific polysaccharide intercellular adhesin. J. Infect. Dis.174:881-884.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    Mack, D., N. Siemssen, and R. Laurs. 1992. Parallel induction by glucose of adherence and a polysaccharide antigen specific for plastic-adherent Staphylococcus epidermidis: evidence for functional relation to intercellular adhesion. Infect. Immun.60:2048-2057.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. 40.↵
    Nedelmann, M., A. Sabottke, R. Laufs, and D. Mack. 1998. Generalized transduction for genetic linkage analysis and transfer of transposon insertions in different Staphylococcus epidermidis strains. Zentbl. Bakteriol.287:85-92.
    OpenUrl
  41. 41.↵
    Neubauer, H., and F. Gotz. 1996. Physiology and interaction of nitrate and nitrite reduction in Staphylococcus carnosus. J. Bacteriol.178:2005-2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Nordlund, P., and P. Reichard. 2006. Ribonucleotide reductases. Annu. Rev. Biochem.75:681-706.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 43.↵
    Novick, R. P. 2003. Autoinduction and signal transduction in the regulation of staphylococcal virulence. Mol. Microbiol.48:1429-1449.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Novick, R. P., and D. Jiang. 2003. The staphylococcal saeRS system coordinates environmental signals with agr quorum sensing. Microbiology149:2709-2717.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Pantel, I., P. E. Lindgren, H. Neubauer, and F. Gotz. 1998. Identification and characterization of the Staphylococcus carnosus nitrate reductase operon. Mol. Gen. Genet.259:105-114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. 46.↵
    Projan, S. J., and G. L. Archer. 1989. Mobilization of the relaxable Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pC221 by the conjugative plasmid pGO1 involves three pC221 loci. J. Bacteriol.171:1841-1845.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. 47.↵
    Rogasch, K., V. Ruhmling, J. Pane-Farre, D. Hoper, C. Weinberg, S. Fuchs, M. Schmudde, B. M. Broker, C. Wolz, M. Hecker, and S. Engelmann. 2006. Influence of the two-component system SaeRS on global gene expression in two different Staphylococcus aureus strains. J. Bacteriol.188:7742-7758.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. 48.↵
    Rooijakkers, S. H., M. Ruyken, J. van Roon, K. P. van Kessel, J. A. van Strijp, and W. J. van Wamel. 2006. Early expression of SCIN and CHIPS drives instant immune evasion by Staphylococcus aureus. Cell. Microbiol.8:1282-1293.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    Rupp, M. E., J. S. Ulphani, P. D. Fey, and D. Mack. 1999. Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis polysaccharide intercellular adhesin/hemagglutinin in the pathogenesis of intravascular catheter-associated infection in a rat model. Infect. Immun.67:2656-2659.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Rupp, M. E., J. S. Ulphani, P. D. Fey, and D. Mack. 1999. Characterization of the importance of polysaccharide intercellular adhesin/hemagglutinin of Staphylococcus epidermidis in the pathogenesis of biomaterial-based infection in a mouse foreign body model. Infect. Immun.67:2627-2632.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 51.↵
    Schenk, S., and R. A. Laddiga. 1992. Improved method for electroporation of Staphylococcus aureus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.94:133-138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  52. 52.↵
    Steinhuber, A., C. Goerke, M. G. Bayer, G. Doring, and C. Wolz. 2003. Molecular architecture of the regulatory locus sae of Staphylococcus aureus and its impact on expression of virulence factors. J. Bacteriol.185:6278-6286.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. 53.↵
    Sun, J., L. Zheng, C. Landwehr, J. Yang, and Y. Ji. 2005. Identification of a novel essential two-component signal transduction system, YhcSR, in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Bacteriol.187:7876-7880.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 54.↵
    Vuong, C., M. Durr, A. B. Carmody, A. Peschel, S. J. Klebanoff, and M. Otto. 2004. Regulated expression of pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules in Staphylococcus epidermidis: quorum-sensing determines pro-inflammatory capacity and production of phenol-soluble modulins. Cell. Microbiol.6:753-759.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  55. 55.↵
    Vuong, C., S. Kocianova, J. M. Voyich, Y. Yao, E. R. Fischer, F. R. DeLeo, and M. Otto. 2004. A crucial role for exopolysaccharide modification in bacterial biofilm formation, immune evasion, and virulence. J. Biol. Chem.279:54881-54886.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. 56.↵
    Vuong, C., J. M. Voyich, E. R. Fischer, K. R. Braughton, A. R. Whitney, F. R. DeLeo, and M. Otto. 2004. Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin (PIA) protects Staphylococcus epidermidis against major components of the human innate immune system. Cell. Microbiol.6:269-275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  57. 57.↵
    Xiong, Y. Q., J. Willard, M. R. Yeaman, A. L. Cheung, and A. S. Bayer. 2006. Regulation of Staphylococcus aureus alpha-toxin gene (hla) expression by agr, sarA, and sae in vitro and in experimental infective endocarditis. J. Infect. Dis.194:1267-1275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  58. 58.↵
    Yamazaki, K., F. Kato, Y. Kamio, and J. Kaneko. 2006. Expression of gamma-hemolysin regulated by sae in Staphylococcus aureus strain Smith 5R. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.259:174-180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  59. 59.↵
    Yanisch-Perron, D., J. Vierra, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene33:103-119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    Yao, Y., D. E. Sturdevant, and M. Otto. 2005. Genomewide analysis of gene expression in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms: insights into the pathophysiology of S. epidermidis biofilms and the role of phenol-soluble modulins in formation of biofilms. J. Infect. Dis.191:289-298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  61. 61.↵
    Yao, Y., D. E. Sturdevant, A. Villaruz, L. Xu, Q. Gao, and M. Otto. 2005. Factors characterizing Staphylococcus epidermidis invasiveness determined by comparative genomics. Infect. Immun.73:1856-1860.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Staphylococcus epidermidis saeR Is an Effector of Anaerobic Growth and a Mediator of Acute Inflammation
L. D. Handke, K. L. Rogers, M. E. Olson, G. A. Somerville, T. J. Jerrells, M. E. Rupp, P. M. Dunman, P. D. Fey
Infection and Immunity Dec 2007, 76 (1) 141-152; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00556-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Staphylococcus epidermidis saeR Is an Effector of Anaerobic Growth and a Mediator of Acute Inflammation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Staphylococcus epidermidis saeR Is an Effector of Anaerobic Growth and a Mediator of Acute Inflammation
L. D. Handke, K. L. Rogers, M. E. Olson, G. A. Somerville, T. J. Jerrells, M. E. Rupp, P. M. Dunman, P. D. Fey
Infection and Immunity Dec 2007, 76 (1) 141-152; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00556-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Bacterial Proteins
inflammation
Staphylococcus epidermidis

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522