Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Immunity and Vaccines

Characterization of the Fine Specificity of Bovine CD8 T-Cell Responses to Defined Antigens from the Protozoan Parasite Theileria parva

Simon P. Graham, Roger Pellé, Mat Yamage, Duncan M. Mwangi, Yoshikazu Honda, Ramadhan S. Mwakubambanya, Etienne P. de Villiers, Evelyne Abuya, Elias Awino, James Gachanja, Ferdinand Mbwika, Anthony M. Muthiani, Cecelia Muriuki, John K. Nyanjui, Fredrick O. Onono, Julius Osaso, Victor Riitho, Rosemary M. Saya, Shirley A. Ellis, Declan J. McKeever, Niall D. MacHugh, Sarah C. Gilbert, Jean-Christophe Audonnet, W. Ivan Morrison, Pierre van der Bruggen, Evans L. N. Taracha
Simon P. Graham
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: s.graham@vla.defra.gsi.gov.uk
Roger Pellé
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mat Yamage
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Duncan M. Mwangi
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshikazu Honda
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramadhan S. Mwakubambanya
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Etienne P. de Villiers
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evelyne Abuya
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elias Awino
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James Gachanja
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ferdinand Mbwika
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony M. Muthiani
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cecelia Muriuki
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John K. Nyanjui
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fredrick O. Onono
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julius Osaso
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Victor Riitho
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosemary M. Saya
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shirley A. Ellis
2Immunology Division, Institute for Animal Health, Compton RG20 7NN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Declan J. McKeever
3Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0PZ
4Division of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin EH25 9RG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Niall D. MacHugh
4Division of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin EH25 9RG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah C. Gilbert
5Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Roosevelt Drive, Headington, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jean-Christophe Audonnet
6Discovery Research, Merial SAS, Lyon Gerland Laboratory, 254, rue Marcel Merieux, 69007 Lyon, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Ivan Morrison
4Division of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin EH25 9RG
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre van der Bruggen
7Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research—Brussels Branch, Avenue Hippocrate 74, UCL 7459, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evans L. N. Taracha
1International Livestock Research Institute, P.O. Box 30709, Nairobi 00100, Kenya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01244-07
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Immunity against the bovine intracellular protozoan parasite Theileria parva has been shown to be mediated by CD8 T cells. Six antigens targeted by CD8 T cells from T. parva-immune cattle of different major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genotypes have been identified, raising the prospect of developing a subunit vaccine. To facilitate further dissection of the specificity of protective CD8 T-cell responses and to assist in the assessment of responses to vaccination, we set out to identify the epitopes recognized in these T. parva antigens and their MHC restriction elements. Nine epitopes in six T. parva antigens, together with their respective MHC restriction elements, were successfully identified. Five of the cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte epitopes were found to be restricted by products of previously described alleles, and four were restricted by four novel restriction elements. Analyses of CD8 T-cell responses to five of the epitopes in groups of cattle carrying the defined restriction elements and immunized with live parasites demonstrated that, with one exception, the epitopes were consistently recognized by animals of the respective genotypes. The analysis of responses was extended to animals immunized with multiple antigens delivered in separate vaccine constructs. Specific CD8 T-cell responses were detected in 19 of 24 immunized cattle. All responder cattle mounted responses specific for antigens for which they carried an identified restriction element. By contrast, only 8 of 19 responder cattle displayed a response to antigens for which they did not carry an identified restriction element. These data demonstrate that the identified antigens are inherently dominant in animals with the corresponding MHC genotypes.

Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-restricted CD8 T-cell responses have been shown to play an important role in the immune response against a number of protozoan infections, including Plasmodium spp. (3, 22) and Theileria spp. (14) infections. Theileria parva causes an often fatal lymphoproliferative disease of cattle known as East Coast fever (16). Like Plasmodium spp., T. parva initially infects and replicates in nucleated cells, after which it invades erythrocytes. However, the ability of T. parva to transform host lymphocytes and undergo rapid multiplication in the transformed cells, as well as the limited replicative capacity of the intraerythrocytic piroplasm stage, represent fundamental differences from the corresponding plasmodial stages. Cattle that recover from an initial exposure to T. parva, either spontaneously or as a result of chemotherapy, are solidly immune to homologous and, in certain instances, heterologous challenge (17). The long duration of immunity to East Coast fever also contrasts with immunity to malaria, which develops only after several years of exposure and wanes in the absence of exposure to parasite challenge (9). The ability to culture the schizont stage of the parasite in continuously growing lymphoblastoid cell lines allows detailed in vitro analyses of T-cell responses to the whole parasite; this system has been used extensively to monitor responses in animals undergoing immunization and challenge and to examine the specificity of the responses (6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 15, 19, 20).

Evidence that immunity to T. parva is mediated by MHC class I-restricted CD8 T cells specific for the intralymphocytic schizont stage of the parasite is based on observations on the kinetics of CD8 T-cell responses (15) and the demonstration that immunity can be transferred adoptively with CD8 T-cell-enriched populations from immune cattle (13). Parasite-specific CD8 T-cell responses induced by immunization with a single parasite strain show differential degrees of recognition of heterologous parasite strains, and a close correlation between the specificity of CD8 T-cell responses and the cross-immunity profiles of distinct parasite strains has been observed previously (8, 19). Analyses of CD8 T-cell responses of cattle of defined MHC genotypes have suggested that strain specificity is due, in part, to the focusing of the responses of individual animals on a limited number of immunodominant peptides and MHC determinants (8, 19).

Recently, six T. parva antigens recognized by CD8 T cells have been identified using CD8 T-cell lines from immune cattle to screen a parasite cDNA library and a set of cDNAs selected on the basis of bioinformatic analyses of the parasite genome (10, 11). All but one of the CD8 T-cell lines used for screening identified a single antigen, and lines from cattle of different MHC genotypes tended to identify different antigens. Additional analyses of a number of these target antigens have demonstrated that they are polymorphic (R. Pellé, unpublished data). The identification of schizont antigens provides an opportunity not only to explore vaccination, but also to dissect further the specificity of CD8 T-cell responses in order to understand better the basis of the strain specificity of immunity to T. parva. Here, we report the identification of antigenic epitopes in the six CD8 T-cell target antigens and their MHC restriction specificities. By examining responses of cattle to immunization with live parasites or a cocktail of the CD8 T-cell target antigens, we also provide evidence that these antigens are highly dominant in animals with the corresponding MHC genotypes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cattle and cell lines.All animal experimentation procedures were reviewed and approved by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee or the United Kingdom Home Office. Boran (Bos indicus), Jersey (Bos taurus), Holstein-Friesian (Bos taurus), and crossbred cattle with no prior exposure to T. parva were recruited for the study. Cattle of defined MHC genotypes were included. MHC class I types were determined using a combination of serological typing with alloantisera (21) and/or monoclonal antibodies (5) and allele-specific PCR (4). Most of the animals expressing one of three fully defined class I haplotypes (B. taurus A10 and A18 and B. indicus A10-KN104) were the progeny of bulls known to carry these haplotypes, and this group included several animals produced by father-daughter mating that were homozygous for the MHC type. For experiments involving the immunization of cattle with T. parva antigens, the expression of specific class I alleles was also confirmed functionally by testing the ability of cells from individual typed animals to present peptide to CD8 T-cell lines of the appropriate MHC restriction specificity. Lymphoblasts obtained by the stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with concanavalin A (Sigma, Poole, United Kingdom) (6) were pulsed with titration preparations of antigenic peptides for 1 h at 37°C and then fixed in 0.1% glutaraldehyde as described previously (12). Cells (2.5 × 104/well) were cocultured with antigen-specific CD8 T-cell lines, and recognition was assessed by a gamma interferon (IFN-γ) enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay (10).

Cattle were immunized against the T. parva Muguga stock by the infection-and-treatment method and then challenged after 3 months with the same parasite stock described previously (19). T. parva-specific polyclonal CD8 T-cell lines and clones were established from the peripheral blood of immunized animals by repeated restimulation with irradiated autologous infected lymphoblasts as previously described (6). After three rounds of in vitro restimulation, CD8 T cells were purified by magnetic cell sorting with a MACS system according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Miltenyi Biotec, Gergisch Gladbach, Germany). CD8 T cells were sorted indirectly using a monoclonal antibody specific for bovine CD8 (IL-A105; ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya), followed by incubation with goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec). CD8 T cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (tested for bovine viral diarrhea virus and Mycoplasma spp.; Perbio Science UK, Ltd., Cramlington, United Kingdom), 10 U of recombinant human interleukin-2 (Sigma)/ml, 100 IU of penicillin/ml, 100 μg of streptomycin/ml, 50 μg of gentamicin/ml, 5 × 10−5 M 2-mercaptoethanol, and 2 mM l-glutamine and were stimulated every 14 days with irradiated autologous T. parva-infected lymphoblasts at a responder-to-stimulator ratio between 2:1 and 10:1 (6). The specificities of the CD8 T-cell lines were assessed using a chromium-51 release assay (6). CD8 T-cell lines were harvested 6 to 8 days poststimulation and cocultured for 4 h with chromium-51 (Amersham)-labeled T. parva-infected lymphoblasts, peptide-pulsed skin fibroblasts, or transfected COS-7 cells (10). The degree of lysis of target cells was calculated as follows: % lysis = 100 × (test release − spontaneous release)/(maximum release − spontaneous release).

Alternatively, CD8 T-cell specificity was assessed by measuring the release of IFN-γ by an ELISPOT assay (10) or, in limited instances, by a bioassay (1). CD8 T cells were harvested 7 to 14 days poststimulation and resuspended at 2 × 105/ml in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 5 U of recombinant human interleukin-2 (Sigma)/ml and were cocultured with autologous immortalized skin fibroblasts or COS-7 cells pulsed with synthetic peptides or transfected with plasmids expressing parasite antigens. Experiments directed at epitope mapping and the identification of MHC class I restriction elements utilized CD8 T cells from eight cattle, including the cell lines and the clone used previously to identify the six T. parva antigens (Table 1; 10). The generation of the clonal CD8 T-cell line from animal D409 was described previously (8).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Summary of CD8 T-cell target T. parva antigens and cattle from which antigen-specific CD8 T-cell lines were generated

T. parva antigens.Six T. parva antigens, Tp1, Tp2, Tp4, Tp5, Tp7, and Tp8, previously identified to be the targets of CD8 T-cell responses of T. parva-immune cattle, were used in this study (Table 1) (10). cDNA corresponding to the full-length open reading frame (ORF) for Tp2 was cloned into the eukaryotic expression plasmid vector pTargeT (Promega, Madison, WI), while the full-length ORFs for Tp1, Tp4, and Tp5 were cloned into the eukaryotic expression plasmid vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, Paisley, United Kingdom) (10). Partial cDNAs encoding amino acids 1 to 291 of the 721 amino acid residues of Tp7 and all but the first 22 amino acid residues of Tp8 were also cloned into pcDNA3.

Cloning and functional screening of BoLA class I cDNA.mRNA was purified from bovine peripheral blood mononuclear cells by using the mRNA DIRECT kit (Dynal Biotech, Oslo, Norway). Reverse transcriptase PCR was conducted using degenerate primers designed with sequences from the partially conserved regions of published bovine leukocyte antigen (BoLA) class I cDNA sequences (5′-ATG[A/G]GGCCGCGA[A/G]CCC[T/A]-3′ and 5′-TCA[A/C][A/G]CTTTAGGAAC[C/T][G/A]TG[A/C]G-3′). PCR products were cloned into pTargeT (Promega), and orientation was confirmed by PCR with a T7 forward primer and a pan-BoLA class I gene reverse primer (5′-CCAGGTATCTGCGGAGCC-3′). Plasmid DNA from all positive clones was purified with a QIAprep Spin miniprep kit (QIAGEN, Crawley, United Kingdom), and aliquots of 50 ng/well were used to transfect 2 × 104 COS-7 cells/well in 96-well flat-bottom plates. Twenty-four hours posttransfection, COS-7 cells were detached and the surface expression of BoLA class I was assessed by staining with a pan-BoLA class I monoclonal antibody (IL-A88; ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya) (5) and analysis by flow cytometry using a FACScan (Becton Dickinson, Sunnyvale, CA). COS-7 cells were cotransfected with positive cDNA clones (100 ng/well) and the appropriate CD8 T-cell target antigen cDNA (100 ng/well), and the recognition of transfectants by CD8 T-cell lines was assessed by an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay as described previously (10). For cytotoxicity assays, COS-7 cells transfected with BoLA and CD8 T-cell target antigen cDNAs and T. parva-infected cells were labeled with chromium-51 (Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) and lysis by parasite-specific T-cell lines was assessed by measuring isotope release after incubation for 4 h at 37°C (6).

Mapping and identification of antigenic peptides.Exonuclease III digestion was used to generate truncated cDNA clones to assist in mapping the epitope-encoding region of the Tp1 gene. Recombinant Tp1 plasmid DNA was digested with ApaI to generate exonuclease III-resistant protruding 3′ termini. The linearized plasmid DNA was purified by phenol-chloroform extraction and digested with XhoI, which cut at a unique vector cloning site to generate exonuclease III-sensitive recessed 3′ termini. The linearized DNA was purified as described above, and 100-ng aliquots were digested with 1 U of exonuclease III (New England BioLabs, Beverly, MA) in 20-μl reaction mixtures at 37°C for various times (from 0 to 30 min). Reactions were stopped by 10 min of incubation at 75°C. DNA was ethanol precipitated, washed with 70% ethanol, air dried, and redissolved in 20 μl of 1× Mung Bean nuclease reaction buffer (New England BioLabs). Five units of Mung Bean nuclease was added to each reaction mixture, and the mixtures were incubated at 30°C for 1 h to remove single-stranded DNA extensions and create blunt ends that could be ligated. The DNA was purified, precipitated, washed, and dissolved in 10 μl of sterile distilled water. For re-ligation, 5 μl of DNA was mixed with 1 μl of 10× T4 DNA ligase buffer, 3 μl of water, and 1 μl of T4 DNA ligase (New England BioLabs) and the mixture was incubated at 16°C overnight. Competent Escherichia coli DH5α cells were then transformed with 2 μl of the ligation mixture, plated onto agar plates containing ampicillin, and grown overnight. Plasmid DNA from single bacterial colonies was purified by using the Wizard Plus SV miniprep DNA purification kit (Promega), and inserts were excised by digestion with BamHI and NotI. Plasmid clones with cDNA inserts of different sizes were selected for IFN-γ ELISPOT screening. Oligonucleotide primers were designed to allow the amplification of three overlapping fragments of a 387-bp region of Tp1 cDNA, six overlapping fragments of Tp4 cDNA, four overlapping fragments of Tp7 cDNA, and six overlapping fragments of Tp8 cDNA, which were cloned into pTargeT (Promega) (see Fig. 1). The recognition of the truncated subclones by CD8 T-cell lines was then analyzed by an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Synthetic overlapping peptides spanning the entire lengths of Tp2 (12-mers offset by two residues) and Tp5 (11-mers offset by two residues) and a defined epitope-containing region of Tp1 (12-mers offset by two residues) were obtained from Mimotopes (Clayton, Australia), while peptides spanning epitope-containing regions of Tp4, Tp7, and Tp8 (15-mers offset by four residues) were obtained from Pepscan Systems B.V. (Lelystad, The Netherlands). Peptides were dissolved in a solution of 50% (vol/vol) DNA synthesis-grade acetonitrile-water (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, United Kingdom), aliquoted, and stored at −20°C.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Mapping of CD8 T-cell epitopes on defined T. parva antigens. The recognition of autologous immortalized skin fibroblasts transiently transfected with full-length, partial-length, exonuclease III-digested, or cloned fragments of cDNA encoding Tp1, Tp4, Tp7, and Tp8 by antigen-specific CD8 T-cell lines (those from animals BV115 [Tp1], BX063 [Tp4 and Tp8], and BW012 [Tp7]) was assessed by an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. The results of one of two independent experiments are shown. The data are the mean numbers of SFC/104 CD8 T cells for triplicate cultures. The amino acids included in the antigen peptides are indicated.

Autologous immortalized skin fibroblasts (10) were cocultured with parasite-specific CD8 T cells in the presence of peptides at a concentration of 1 μg/ml, and recognition was assessed by an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Based on the sequences of positive overlapping peptides, individual 8-, 9-, 10-, and 11-mer peptides were synthesized, and titration preparations of peptides were tested using an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. To test for cytotoxic activity, immortalized skin fibroblasts were pulsed overnight with peptides at a concentration of 1 μg/ml and labeled with chromium-51 (Amersham) and the degree of lysis by CD8 T-cell lines was measured (6).

Assessment of the specificity of CD8 T-cell responses following heterologous primer-booster immunization of cattle with recombinant plasmid DNA and viruses.Recombinant pSG2 DNA vaccine plasmids, canary pox (CP) virus, and the modified vaccinia virus Ankara strain (MVA) expressing Tp1, Tp2, Tp4, Tp5, and Tp8 ORFs were used in a heterologous primer-booster regimen to immunize calves that had been identified as expressing a BoLA class I allele capable of presenting one or more of the defined antigens to CD8 T cells (10). The recombinant DNA, CP virus, and MVA constructs expressing the five single antigens were prepared separately and inoculated at different sites on each animal. Cattle were primed with 0.5 mg of each recombinant DNA plasmid by intradermal injection or with 108 PFU of each recombinant CP virus by subcutaneous injection. After 4 weeks, cattle were inoculated subcutaneously with 5 × 108 PFU of each MVA recombinant. Control calves received sham inoculations with phosphate-buffered saline. Three weeks after the MVA booster, cattle were challenged with a lethal dose of T. parva sporozoites (1:20 dilution of T. parva Muguga stock sporozoite stabilate no. 4133; ILRI, Nairobi, Kenya). Purified CD8 T cells (2.5 × 105/well) and monocytes (2.5 × 104/well) were cocultured with pools of overlapping synthetic peptides (at a 1-μg/ml final concentration) covering the entire antigens (Tp2 12-mers offset by two residues [Mimotopes], Tp5 11-mers offset by two residues [Mimotopes], and Tp1, Tp4, and Tp8 16-mers offset by four residues [Pepscan Systems]), and responses were measured by an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (10). Responses were classified as antigen specific when the number of spot-forming cells (SFC) in wells containing peptide was three times greater than that obtained with T cells in medium alone. For all responses, the number of SFC among peptide-stimulated cells was >2 standard deviations (95% confidence interval) above the mean number of SFC among unstimulated cells.

Statistical analysis.An analysis of variance for the evaluation of fixed effects on different traits was performed by using SAS Release 8.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.The nucleotide sequences of the BoLA class I cDNAs for T2c, T5, and T7 have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers EU189194, EU189195, and EU189196, respectively.

RESULTS

Identification of epitopes on T. parva antigens recognized by CD8 T cells.A two-step approach to the identification of the CD8 T-cell epitopes on T. parva antigens was adopted, utilizing CD8 T-cell lines from T. parva-immune animals in an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. The first step employed a molecular approach to map the epitope-containing regions, and the second step involved the screening of overlapping synthetic peptides for fine mapping and definition of the antigenic peptides. Due to their small size, Tp2 and Tp5 were omitted from the first step and peptides spanning the entire proteins were utilized.

Screening for CD8 T-cell recognition of autologous immortalized skin fibroblasts transfected with cDNA clones encoding segments of antigens Tp1, Tp4, Tp7, and Tp8 identified regions encoding antigenic peptides (Fig. 1). For one of the antigens, Tp1, a set of four truncated cDNA clones that had been digested to various lengths by exonuclease III and Mung Bean nuclease was used. Screening of these clones with a Tp1-specific CD8 T-cell line showed that the antigenic peptide(s) lay between amino acid residues 192 and 241. The presence of an epitope(s) in this region was confirmed by screening a further three overlapping cDNA subclones spanning the corresponding part of the gene. Sets of sequential overlapping cDNA clones were used to locate the epitope-containing regions in a further three antigens, Tp4, Tp7, and Tp8. In the case of Tp7, these clones corresponded to the first 291 amino acids of the protein (full length, 721 amino acids), as the original cDNA clone identified by the screening of a parasite cDNA library with CD8 T cells encodes only this part of the protein (10). The screening of sets of six, four, and three overlapping fragments of Tp4, Tp7, and Tp8 cDNAs, respectively, with the respective specific CD8 T-cell lines established the epitope-containing regions as amino acids 296 to 409 of Tp4 (Tp4296-409), Tp7145-224, and Tp8294-440. The screening of a further three short overlapping cDNA clones corresponding to residues 294 to 440 of Tp8 further resolved the epitope-containing region to Tp8338-394.

Libraries of overlapping synthetic peptides covering the defined epitope-containing regions of Tp1, Tp4, Tp7, and Tp8, along with the entire lengths of Tp2 and Tp5, were screened to determine the sites of the epitopes. Three polyclonal CD8 T-cell lines and one cloned antigen-specific CD8 T-cell line, derived from different cattle, were used to screen the Tp2 antigen, whereas a single polyclonal T-cell line was used for each of the other antigens. CD8 T-cell reactivity against two overlapping peptides of Tp1, Tp4, Tp5, and Tp7 and against three overlapping Tp8 peptides was observed (data not shown). The four CD8 T-cell lines used to screen Tp2 peptides identified four distinct epitope-containing sites (data not shown).

The minimal-length antigenic peptide that gave maximal CD8 T-cell reactivity was determined for each antigenic site by screening titration preparations of shorter peptides spanning the epitope-containing regions with an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (Fig. 2). This screening resulted in the identification of the minimal-length antigenic peptides as the 11-mer Tp1214-224 (VGYPKVKEEML; P < 0.01) and the 9-mers Tp4328-336 (TGASIQTTL; P < 0.01), Tp587-95 (SKADVIAKY; P < 0.01), Tp7206-214 (EFISFPISL; P < 0.01), and Tp8379-387 (CGAELNHFL; P < 0.01) (Fig. 2). The Tp2-specific CD8 T cells from animals BW002, BW013, D409, and BW014 identified two 11-mers, Tp227-37 (SHEELKKLGML) and Tp249-59 (KSSHGMGKVGK), and two 9-mers, Tp296-104 (FAQSLVCVL) and Tp298-106 (QSLVCVLMK), respectively (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Identification of CD8 T-cell epitopes on defined T. parva antigens. Titration preparations of overlapping synthetic peptides were used to pulse immortalized skin fibroblasts, and the recognition by antigen-specific CD8 T cells (those from animals BV115 [Tp1213-224], BW002 [Tp224-39], BW013 [Tp248-60], D409 [Tp296-106], BW014 [Tp297-107], BX063 [Tp4328-338 and Tp8378-388], BV050 [Tp583-97], and BW012 [Tp7204-214]) was assessed using an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. Minimal-length antigenic peptides were identified as the shortest peptides that induced CD8 T-cell reactivity at the lowest concentration. The results of one of two independent experiments are shown. The data are the mean numbers of SFC/104 CD8 T cells ± standard errors of the means for triplicate cultures.

The ability of the nine identified minimal-length antigenic peptides to elicit cytotoxic activity in specific CD8 T-cell lines was examined using autologous immortalized skin fibroblasts pulsed with peptide, and the resultant cytotoxicity was compared with that obtained using parasitized cells as targets (Fig. 3). In all cases, the degree of lysis of peptide-pulsed cells was greater than (for T-cell lines from animals BV115 [Tp1214-224], BW014 [Tp298-106], BV050 [Tp587-95], and BX063 [Tp8379-387]) or comparable to (for T-cell lines from animals BW002 [Tp227-37], BW013 [Tp249-59], D409 [Tp296-104], BX063 [Tp4328-336], and BW012 [Tp7206-214]) that of infected cells, further indicating that these peptide sequences are likely to represent the natural epitopes (P < 0.01).

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

CD8 cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte activity against epitope-pulsed immortalized skin fibroblasts and T. parva-infected cells. The lysis of T. parva-infected cells and peptide-pulsed and unpulsed immortalized skin fibroblasts by antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (those from animals BV115 [Tp1214-224], BW002 [Tp227-37], BW013 [Tp249-59], D409 [Tp296-104], BW014 [Tp298-106], BX063 [Tp4328-336 and Tp8379-387], BV050 [Tp587-95], and BW012 [Tp7206-214]) was evaluated using a 51Cr release assay. The results of one of two independent experiments are shown. The data are the means ± standard errors of the means for triplicate cultures. E:T ratio, effector-to-target cell ratio; TpM, T. parva-infected cells; iSF, unpulsed immortalized skin fibroblasts; iSF peptide, peptide-pulsed immortalized skin fibroblasts.

Identification of BoLA restriction of CD8 T-cell epitopes on T. parva antigens.Only a few of the MHC class I genes expressed by the animals used in these experiments had been identified at the outset of the studies (10). The B. taurus haplotype carrying the serologically defined class I specificity A18 was known to express a single class I gene, N*01301, and this gene had been used in the antigen-screening protocol that resulted in the identification of Tp1. A second haplotype, found in B. indicus cattle, carries the A10 and KN104 serological specificities, which are encoded by the N*00101 and N*00301 class I genes, respectively; these genes were also used in the antigen-screening protocol that identified the Tp4 and Tp8 antigens. Subsequent experiments involving cotransfection with the class I and antigen genes demonstrated that both Tp4 and Tp8 are presented by the N*00101 gene product. The recognition of the epitopes identified in Tp1, Tp4, and Tp8 in the context of these class I molecules was confirmed by testing COS-7 cells transfected with the individual class I genes and CD8 target antigen cDNAs in an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (Fig. 4).

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

BoLA restriction of CD8 T-cell epitopes from defined T. parva antigens. The recognition of COS-7 cells transiently cotransfected with CD8 T-cell target antigen cDNA and test BoLA cDNA or with CD8 T-cell target antigen cDNA and irrelevant BoLA cDNA or transfected with test BoLA cDNA alone by antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (those from animals BV115 [Tp1214-224], BW002 [Tp227-37], BW013 [Tp249-59], D409 [Tp296-104], BW014 [Tp298-106], BX063 [Tp4328-336 and Tp8379-387], BV050 [Tp587-95], and BW012 [Tp7206-214]) was assessed using an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay. The results of one of three independent experiments are shown. The data are the mean numbers of SFC/104 CD8 T cells ± standard errors of the means for triplicate cultures. Tx COS-7, COS-7 cell transfection.

The MHC restriction specificities of antigen recognition by the remaining T-cell lines were determined by isolating a set of cloned full-length class I MHC heavy-chain cDNAs from each of the donor animals, cotransfecting COS-7 cells with these cDNAs and the respective CD8 target antigen cDNAs, and screening for recognition by antigen-specific CD8 T-cell lines. The nucleotide sequences of class I cDNAs giving positive responses were then determined.

Using this approach, we identified class I cDNAs capable of presenting the antigens for all of the remaining T-cell lines. As an example, the screening of cDNA clones from animals BW013 and BW014, which recognized the Tp2 antigen, detected 2 of 17 and 1 of 9 class I cDNA clones, respectively, that were effective at presenting Tp2 to the antigen-specific CD8 T-cell lines from these animals. All three positive cDNAs were shown to correspond to the class I allele N*01201 (data not shown), which is expressed by B. taurus animals carrying the A10 class I serological specificity; the latter specificity is encoded by a second gene of this haplotype (N*00102), which differs in sequence from the gene encoding A10 (N*00101) in B. indicus. The four epitopes in Tp2, which had been identified using T-cell lines from four different cattle, were found to be restricted by three different class I alleles. Tp249-59 and Tp298-106, which were identified using T-cell lines from B. taurus A10+ animals, were confirmed to be restricted by N*01201; Tp227-37 and Tp296-104 were restricted by two novel alleles, one designated N*04001 and the other temporarily designated BoLA-T2c, derived from animals BW002 and BX017, respectively (Fig. 4). The epitopes identified in Tp5 and Tp7, Tp587-95 and Tp7206-214, were found to be restricted by two novel alleles, temporarily designated BoLA-T5 and BoLA-T7, respectively, derived from animals BV050 and BW012 (Fig. 4). Cytotoxicity assays were also performed with cells cotransfected with the identified class I cDNAs and the corresponding CD8 T-cell target antigen cDNAs, and in all cases the results confirmed those obtained in the IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (data not shown).

To determine whether the epitopes identified in the course of these studies were consistently recognized by CD8 T cells from animals carrying the respective MHC class I restriction elements, analyses of responses were extended to additional T. parva-immune animals expressing three of the class I alleles, namely, N*00101, N*01301, and N*01201, associated with the serological specificities A10-KN104 (B. indicus), A18 (B. taurus), and A10 (B.taurus), respectively. In each instance, these groups included two or three animals known, on the basis of typing and breeding records, to be homozygous for the MHC type. The results are summarized in Table 2. All five A18+ animals examined were found to respond to Tp1214-224. Similarly, all five B. taurus A10+ animals gave significant responses to both of the epitopes identified in the Tp2 antigen. Of seven B. indicus A10-KN104+ cattle examined, all gave significant responses to the Tp8379-387 epitope, but responses to Tp4328-336 were detected in only four animals, three of which were homozygous for this MHC haplotype. Thus, only one of the four animals heterozygous for the MHC type recognized Tp4328-336.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Recognition of defined T. parva CD8 T-cell epitopes by cattle with defined BoLA types immunized by infection and treatment

Responses induced by immunization of cattle with a mixture of T. parva antigens expressed individually in vaccine constructs.Access to animals subjected to primer-booster immunization with five of the T. parva antigens by using separate vaccine constructs for each antigen (10) provided an opportunity to ascertain whether such immunization results in responses to all of the antigens or only those corresponding to the MHC alleles expressed by the animals. Four groups of six cattle, each expressing one of four selected class I alleles (N*01301, N*01201, N*00101, and T5), were used in these studies. Within each group, three of the animals were immunized with plasmid DNA preparations and three were immunized with recombinant CP viruses expressing five of the T. parva antigens (Tp1, Tp2, Tp4, Tp5, and Tp8). After 4 weeks, all animals received a booster dose of recombinant MVA expressing the same antigens and were then challenged with T. parva sporozoites after a further 3 weeks. Specific CD8 T-cell responses to the five antigens were examined every 7 days by using pools of overlapping peptides in an IFN-γ ELISPOT assay (Table 3). The responses to Tp2 were generally poor, with only four animals, including two of the six animals carrying the identified restriction element (N*1201), giving significant responses. The majority of the animals carrying the identified class I restriction elements for the remaining four antigens generated significant responses to the respective antigens. Thus, all six T5+ animals responded to Tp5, all N*01301+ animals responded to Tp1, and five of six N*00101+ animals responded to both Tp4 and Tp8. By contrast, many of the animals failed to give significant responses to the antigens for which they did not carry an identified class I restriction element. Thus, none of the remaining 18 animals responded to Tp5, and only one and two N*00101-negative animals responded to Tp4 and Tp8, respectively. A larger number (6 of 18) of the N*01301-negative animals responded to Tp1. Overall, in 11 of the 19 animals that responded to one or more antigens, the significant response was focused entirely on the antigen or antigens for which the animal carried the identified class I restriction element. Moreover, the magnitudes of responses to antigens for which the animals carried identified class I restriction elements were in most instances greater than those of responses to other antigens. To illustrate this finding, the CD8 T-cell responses of the six BoLA allele N*00101+ animals are depicted in Fig. 5. After priming and booster immunizations, responses were dominated by Tp8, with significant responses to Tp4 also being observed in five of six animals, although with one exception (that in animal BX225), these responses were of lesser magnitude than the Tp8-specific responses. Three animals mounted a response to a third antigen, Tp1, and this Tp1 response was most significant in animal BX225. Following challenge infection, only one animal, BX219, showed a clear recall of the responses, although the peak was below that observed after the MVA booster. The magnitudes of the responses of the other animals were more variable than those of the BoLA allele N*00101+ animals, but the evidence of boosting of responses in the N*00101-negative animals by challenge was clearer, and in most instances, the hierarchy of dominance was maintained after challenge (data not shown). This strong association between the expression of the defined class I restriction element and the antigen specificity of the CD8 T-cell response indicates that the respective antigens are inherently dominant antigens in animals with the corresponding MHC genotypes.

FIG. 5.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 5.

Antigen specificity of CD8 T cells from BoLA allele N*00101+ cattle vaccinated with defined antigens by using heterologous primer-booster regimens. Three cattle were primed with recombinant CP viruses, and three were primed with plasmid DNA preparations expressing five of the T. parva antigens (Tp1, Tp2, Tp4, Tp5, and Tp8). All cattle were immunized with recombinant vaccinia viruses (MVA) expressing the same antigens after 4 weeks and then challenged with T. parva sporozoites after a further 3 weeks. IFN-γ responses of purified CD8 T cells to pools of overlapping peptides were measured longitudinally using an ELISPOT assay. Responses presented are the medium corrected numbers of SFC/106 CD8 T cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Antigen specificity of CD8 T-cell IFN-γ responses following immunization with defined T. parva antigens

DISCUSSION

Despite the vast pool of potentially antigenic peptides, data from previous studies of cattle immunized by infection and treatment suggested that the CD8 T-cell response is restricted to a limited number of immunodominant antigens (8, 19). Thus, evidence of a hierarchy in dominance in MHC restriction of the response was obtained; responses were often restricted in their parasite strain specificity and, in animals of different MHC genotypes, frequently exhibited different patterns of parasite strain specificity, indicating that they were directed against different antigens. Based on these findings, it was hypothesized that immunodominance was a key factor in determining the parasite strain specificity of immunity. The results of antigen identification studies, which used polyclonal CD8 T-cell lines from T. parva-immune animals of different MHC genotypes to screen a schizont cDNA library and a set of parasite genes selected by bioinformatic analyses, provided further support for this idea. With one exception, T cells from each animal identified only a single antigen, and T-cell lines from animals of different MHC genotypes tended to identify different antigens (10).

The present study set out to identify the epitopes recognized in the T. parva antigens and to determine their MHC restriction specificities, in order to facilitate further dissection of the specificity of CD8 T-cell responses in immune cattle and to allow the development of assays and tools, such as class I tetramers, for monitoring the responses. Nine epitopes in six T. parva antigens, together with their respective MHC restriction elements, were successfully identified. This report provides the first description of CD8 T-cell epitopes and corresponding MHC class I restriction elements in cattle. The epitopes, as defined by the minimal peptide length that induced maximal T-cell reactivity, were either 9-mers or 11-mers. In all but one case, CD8 T cells derived from eight different animals recognized only one of the six antigens. Single epitopes were identified in five of the six antigens; the epitopes in two of these antigens (Tp4 and Tp8) were restricted by the same class I allele, while those in the other three antigens (Tp1, Tp5, and Tp7) were restricted by different class I alleles. The Tp2 antigen was found to contain four epitopes, two of which were restricted by the same MHC class I allele, while the other two epitopes were restricted by different alleles.

The detection of responses to only one of the six antigens, in many cases focused on a single epitope, supports previous evidence that there is a dominance hierarchy in the antigens recognized in CD8 T-cell responses to T. parva. Further studies are needed to determine what proportion of the response in individual immune animals is directed at these antigens in order to provide quantitative data on the extent to which these antigens dominate the response. Immunodominance in outbred populations is a well-described phenomenon for CD8 T-cell responses to viruses and cancer, in which the pool of potential antigenic peptides is relatively small in comparison to those in response to complex intracellular bacterial and protozoan pathogens. The screening of Plasmodium falciparum and Mycobacterium tuberculosis for antigens and epitopes by using CD8 T cells from immunized or exposed humans has shown the recognition of a relatively large number of antigens, rather than a narrow focus on a few immunodominant proteins and epitopes (2, 18). The results of this and earlier studies (8, 19) suggest that immunodominance may play a much greater role in the bovine CD8 T-cell response to T. parva than in the human CD8 T-cell response to pathogens of similar complexity.

The present study provided evidence that T. parva-immune cattle carrying defined MHC class I alleles consistently respond to the epitopes corresponding to the respective MHC backgrounds. Animals homozygous or heterozygous for B. taurus A18 or A10 and B. indicus A10-KN104, which were shown to recognize five epitopes in the Tp1, Tp2, Tp4, and Tp8 antigens, were available for these studies. Responses to the single epitope defined in Tp1 and the two epitopes in Tp2 were consistently detected in all of the B. taurus A18 and A10 animals, respectively. Responses to the epitope in Tp8 were also observed in all seven B. indicus A10-KN104 animals, but only four of these animals responded to the epitope in Tp4. These findings indicate that the Tp1, Tp2, and Tp8 epitopes are dominant in animals with these MHC genotypes. The variable responses to Tp4328-336 suggest that this is a less-dominant epitope; the failure to detect responses in three animals that were heterozygous for the class I restriction element may have been due to the presence of competing dominant epitopes presented via the other MHC haplotype expressed by these animals.

Despite the finding that animals of selected MHC genotypes immunized with live parasites had significant CD8 T-cell responses to only one or, in the case of BoLA allele N*00101+ animals, to one or two of the six antigens, most of the antigens are likely to contain peptides capable of being presented by cells of the different genotypes. Studies of murine and human systems have provided evidence that the relative dominance of particular epitopes can be influenced by a number of factors, including the abundance of processed peptide, the binding affinity of the peptides for the MHC, and the T-cell receptor repertoire (23). The presentation of the different epitopes by the same antigen-presenting cell, i.e., by dedicated antigen-presenting cells following cross-priming or by the parasitized cells themselves, may favor the preferential generation of responses to the most dominant antigens by allowing competition for epitope recognition by T cells. We therefore examined whether or not the dominance of responses to the preferred antigens was retained in animals immunized with five of the antigens incorporated individually into different vaccine constructs. Responses against pools of synthetic peptides spanning entire antigens were measured in order to assess the breadth of the responses. Nineteen of 24 vaccinated animals mounted a CD8 T-cell response, and in all instances, the dominant response was directed against the antigen(s) that was predicted based on the expression of the relevant MHC restriction element. For 11 of the animals, the responses were directed solely against these antigens. Although the assay employed did not allow the target epitopes to be identified, the recognition of the defined epitopes by cattle of the respective MHC genotypes was confirmed for a small number of animals (S. P. Graham, unpublished data). The absence of significant responses to many of the antigens in most animals may reflect a lack of potency of the vaccination protocols rather than an inability of the animals to respond to the antigens. Nevertheless, the findings clearly demonstrate that the preferred antigens are inherently dominant in animals with the respective MHC genotypes. They also suggest that the preferential induction of responses to particular antigens is not due solely to competition for presentation within antigen-presenting cells but rather may reflect the presence within the T-cell repertoire of T cells with high-avidity receptors for the respective epitopes.

The results of these studies are of particular practical significance because of the well-documented antigenic variability among strains of T. parva, which results in incomplete cross-protection against different strains (17). Additional preliminary studies of the antigens described herein have confirmed that the defined epitope regions vary in sequence among parasite strains and are differentially recognized by CD8 T cells (R. Pellé and S. P. Graham, unpublished data). Hence, a major challenge in the development of a vaccine based on the induction of CD8 T-cell responses will be to generate responses that are effective against all parasite strains. Further studies are required to provide a more comprehensive picture of the antigen recognition capacity of animals of different MHC genotypes to ascertain whether combinations of antigens that potentially provide broad protection can be identified and used to induce protective CD8 T-cell responses.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the Animal Health Programme of the United Kingdom Department for International Development (DFID; project number R8042). Y.H. was supported in part by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the government of Japan.

We acknowledge the staff of the ILRI animal sampling group, large-animal and tick units, for excellent animal care and provision of parasites. We thank the ILRI Biometrics Unit for advice on experimental design and statistical analysis. Merial is kindly acknowledged for provision of the recombinant CP virus constructs.

This is ILRI publication no. IL-200705.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 11 September 2007.
    • Returned for modification 15 October 2007.
    • Accepted 27 November 2007.
  • Copyright © 2008 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Ballingall, K. T., D. M. Mwangi, N. D. MacHugh, E. L. Taracha, P. Totte, and D. J. McKeever. 2000. A highly sensitive, non-radioactive assay for T cell activation in cattle: applications in screening for antigens recognised by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. Methods239:85-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    Doolan, D. L., S. Southwood, D. A. Freilich, J. Sidney, N. L. Graber, L. Shatney, L. Bebris, L. Florens, C. Dobano, A. A. Witney, E. Appella, S. L. Hoffman, J. R. Yates III, D. J. Carucci, and A. Sette. 2003. Identification of Plasmodium falciparum antigens by antigenic analysis of genomic and proteomic data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA100:9952-9957.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Doolan, D. L., and N. Martinez-Alier. 2006. Immune response to pre-erythrocytic stages of malaria parasites. Curr. Mol. Med.6:169-185.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  4. 4.↵
    Ellis, S. A., K. A. Staines, M. J. Stear, E. J. Hensen, and W. I. Morrison. 1998. DNA typing for BoLA class I using sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). Eur. J. Immunogenet.25:365-370.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Ellis, S. A., W. I. Morrison, N. D. MacHugh, J. Birch, A. Burrells, and M. J. Stear. 2005. Serological and molecular diversity in the cattle MHC class I region. Immunogenetics57:601-606.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Goddeeris, B. M., and W. I. Morrison. 1988. Techniques for the generation, cloning and characterization of bovine cytotoxic T cells specific for the protozoan Theileria parva. Methods Cell Sci.11:101-110.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Goddeeris, B. M., W. I. Morrison, A. J. Teale, A. Bensaid, and C. L. Baldwin. 1986. Bovine cytotoxic T-cell clones specific for cells infected with the protozoan parasite Theileria parva: parasite strain specificity and class I major histocompatibility complex restriction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA83:5238-5242.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Goddeeris, B. M., W. I. Morrison, P. G. Toye, and R. Bishop. 1990. Strain specificity of bovine Theileria parva-specific cytotoxic T cells is determined by the phenotype of the restricting class I MHC. Immunology69:38-44.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Good, M. F. 2005. Vaccine-induced immunity to malaria parasites and the need for novel strategies. Trends Parasitol.21:29-34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Graham, S. P., R. Pellé, Y. Honda, D. M. Mwangi, N. J. Tonukari, M. Yamage, E. J. Glew, E. P. de Villiers, T. Shah, R. Bishop, E. Abuya, E. Awino, J. Gachanja, A. E. Luyai, F. Mbwika, A. M. Muthiani, D. M. Ndegwa, M. Njahira, J. K. Nyanjui, F. O. Onono, J. Osaso, R. M. Saya, C. Wildmann, C. M. Fraser, I. Maudlin, M. J. Gardner, S. P. Morzaria, S. Loosmore S. C. Gilbert, J. C. Audonnet, P. van der Bruggen, V. Nene, and E. L. N. Taracha. 2006. Theileria parva candidate vaccine antigens recognized by immune bovine cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA103:3286-3291.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Graham, S. P., Y. Honda, R. Pellé, D. M. Mwangi, E. J. Glew, E. P. de Villiers, T. Shah, R. Bishop, P. van der Bruggen, V. Nene, and E. L. N. Taracha. 2007. A novel strategy for the identification of antigens that are recognised by bovine MHC class I restricted cytotoxic T cells in a protozoan infection using reverse vaccinology. Immunome Res.3:2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    McKeever, D. J., E. Awino, and W. I. Morrison. 1992. Afferent lymph veiled cells prime CD4+ T cell responses in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol.22:3057-3061.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    McKeever, D. J., E. L. N. Taracha, E. L. Innes, N. D. MacHugh, E. Awino, B. M. Goddeeris, and W. I. Morrison. 1994. Adoptive transfer of immunity to Theileria parva in the CD8+ fraction of responding efferent lymph. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA91:1959-1963.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    McKeever, D. J., E. L. Taracha, W. I. Morrison, A. J. Musoke, and S. P. Morzaria. 1999. Protective immune mechanisms against Theileria parva: evolution of vaccine development strategies. Parasitol. Today15:263-267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  15. 15.↵
    Morrison, W. I., B. M. Goddeeris, A. J. Teale, C. M. Groocock, S. J. Kemp, and D. A. Stagg. 1987. Cytotoxic T cells elicited in cattle challenged with Theileria parva (Muguga): evidence for restriction by class I MHC determinants and parasite strain specificity. Parasite Immunol.9:563-578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Norval, R. A. I., B. D. Perry, and A. S. Young. 1992. The epidemiology of Theileria in Africa. Academic Press Ltd., London, United Kingdom.
  17. 17.↵
    Radley, D. E., C. G. D. Brown, M. P. Cunningham, C. D. Kimber, F. L. Musisi, R. C. Payne, R. E. Purnell, S. M. Stagg, and A. S. Young. 1975. Chemoprophylactic immunization of cattle against Theileria parva (Muguga) and five Theileria strains. Vet. Parasitol.1:35-41.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Sable, S. B., S. Kaur, I. Verma, and G. K. Khuller. 2005. Immunodominance of low molecular weight secretory polypeptides of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to induce cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response. Vaccine23:4947-4954.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Taracha, E. L. N., B. M. Goddeeris, S. P. Morzaria, and W. I. Morrison. 1995. Parasite strain specificity of precursor cytotoxic T cells in individual animals correlates with cross-protection in cattle challenged with Theileria parva. Infect. Immun.63:1258-1262.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    Taracha, E. L., B. M. Goddeeris, A. J. Teale, S. J. Kemp, and W. I. Morrison. 1995. Parasite strain specificity of bovine cytotoxic T cell responses to Theileria parva is determined primarily by immunodominance. J. Immunol.155:4854-4860.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. 21.↵
    Teale, A. J., S. J. Kemp, F. Young, and R. L. Spooner. 1983. Selection by major histocompatibility type (BoLA) of lymphoid cells derived from a bovine chimaera and transformed by Theileria parasites. Parasite Immunol.5:329-335.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Tsuji, M., and F. Zavala. 2003. T cells as mediators of protective immunity against liver stages of Plasmodium. Trends Parasitol.19:88-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  23. 23.↵
    Yewdell, J. W., and J. R. Bennink. 1999. Immunodominance in major histocompatibility complex class I-restricted T lymphocyte responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol.17:51-88.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Characterization of the Fine Specificity of Bovine CD8 T-Cell Responses to Defined Antigens from the Protozoan Parasite Theileria parva
Simon P. Graham, Roger Pellé, Mat Yamage, Duncan M. Mwangi, Yoshikazu Honda, Ramadhan S. Mwakubambanya, Etienne P. de Villiers, Evelyne Abuya, Elias Awino, James Gachanja, Ferdinand Mbwika, Anthony M. Muthiani, Cecelia Muriuki, John K. Nyanjui, Fredrick O. Onono, Julius Osaso, Victor Riitho, Rosemary M. Saya, Shirley A. Ellis, Declan J. McKeever, Niall D. MacHugh, Sarah C. Gilbert, Jean-Christophe Audonnet, W. Ivan Morrison, Pierre van der Bruggen, Evans L. N. Taracha
Infection and Immunity Jan 2008, 76 (2) 685-694; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01244-07

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Characterization of the Fine Specificity of Bovine CD8 T-Cell Responses to Defined Antigens from the Protozoan Parasite Theileria parva
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Characterization of the Fine Specificity of Bovine CD8 T-Cell Responses to Defined Antigens from the Protozoan Parasite Theileria parva
Simon P. Graham, Roger Pellé, Mat Yamage, Duncan M. Mwangi, Yoshikazu Honda, Ramadhan S. Mwakubambanya, Etienne P. de Villiers, Evelyne Abuya, Elias Awino, James Gachanja, Ferdinand Mbwika, Anthony M. Muthiani, Cecelia Muriuki, John K. Nyanjui, Fredrick O. Onono, Julius Osaso, Victor Riitho, Rosemary M. Saya, Shirley A. Ellis, Declan J. McKeever, Niall D. MacHugh, Sarah C. Gilbert, Jean-Christophe Audonnet, W. Ivan Morrison, Pierre van der Bruggen, Evans L. N. Taracha
Infection and Immunity Jan 2008, 76 (2) 685-694; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01244-07
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

Antigens, Protozoan
CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes
Theileria parva

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522