Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Fungal and Parasitic Infections | Spotlight

Evidence of a Role for Monocytes in Dissemination and Brain Invasion by Cryptococcus neoformans

Caroline Charlier, Kirsten Nielsen, Samira Daou, Madly Brigitte, Fabrice Chretien, Françoise Dromer
Caroline Charlier
1Institut Pasteur, Unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, CNRS URA3012, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirsten Nielsen
2Department of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samira Daou
1Institut Pasteur, Unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, CNRS URA3012, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Madly Brigitte
3INSERM U841, IMRB, Team 10, and Département de Pathologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Université Paris 12, Val-de-Marne, Créteil F-94000, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabrice Chretien
3INSERM U841, IMRB, Team 10, and Département de Pathologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Université Paris 12, Val-de-Marne, Créteil F-94000, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Françoise Dromer
1Institut Pasteur, Unité de Mycologie Moléculaire, CNRS URA3012, Paris, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: francoise.dromer@pasteur.fr
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01065-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

The pathogenesis of cryptococcosis, including the events leading to the production of meningoencephalitis, is still largely unknown. Evidence of a transcellular passage of Cryptococcus neoformans across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and subsequent BBB disruption exists, but the paracellular passage of free yeasts and the role of monocytes in yeast dissemination and brain invasion (Trojan horse method) remain uncertain. We used our model of disseminated cryptococcosis, in which crossing of the BBB starts 6 h after intravenous inoculation, to study paracellular passage of the BBB. We prepared bone marrow-derived monocytes (BMDM) infected in vitro with C. neoformans (BMDM yeasts) and free yeasts and measured fungal loads in tissues. (i) Spleen and lung CFU were >2-fold higher in mice treated with BMDM yeasts than in those treated with free yeasts for 1 and 24 h (P < 0.05), while brain CFU were increased (3.9 times) only at 24 h (P < 0.05). (ii) By comparing the kinetics of brain invasion in naïve mice and in mice with preestablished cryptococcosis, we found that CFU were lower in the latter case, except at 6 h, when CFU from mice inoculated with BMDM yeasts were comparable to those measured in naïve mice and 2.5-fold higher than those in mice with preestablished cryptococcosis who were inoculated with free yeasts. (iii) Late phagocyte depletion obtained by clodronate injection reduced disease severity and lowered the fungal burden by 40% in all organs studied. These results provide evidence for Trojan horse crossing of the BBB by C. neoformans, together with mechanisms involving free yeasts, and overall for a role of phagocytes in fungal dissemination.

Cryptococcus neoformans is an encapsulated yeast responsible for cryptococcosis. It is pathogenic for patients with defective immunity, especially those with AIDS (4). The main clinical presentation is disseminated meningoencephalitis. Cryptococcal meningoencephalitis is always fatal without antifungal therapy, and the death rate is still almost 20% despite adequate antifungal and antiretroviral therapy (33). Brain lesions consist of early endothelial capillary damage followed by fungal proliferation, first in the perivascular spaces and then in the neuropile, with secondary seeding of the meningeal spaces (6). Local inflammation is limited (26, 30), and lesions are described as dilation of the perivascular spaces and as cerebral masses (7, 10, 26).

The pathogenesis of cryptococcosis is still largely unknown (17), while the events leading to the constitution of bacterial meningitis are better understood (25). Bacteremia is critical for the constitution of pneumococcal meningitis (3) and other bacterial meningitides. During cryptococcosis, fungemia is detected in about 50% of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients (15). The correlation between fungemia and dissemination, including brain invasion, has been made for experimental models of cryptococcosis (32), and fungemia is identified as an independent parameter of early mycological failure in humans (15). Brain invasion by C. neoformans requires viable yeasts and is thought to occur through the blood-brain barrier (BBB) at the cortical capillary level, not through the choroid plexus (6) as observed for bacterial pathogens (42). The BBB is an anatomical and physiological barrier composed of endothelial cells and pericytes. Endothelial cells are closely associated by numerous tight junctions limiting the circulation between the blood and brain compartments. Monocytes can physiologically cross this barrier through a well-described sequence of tethering, rolling, stopping, and diapedesis. The last step requires a temporary loosening of the tight junctions, involving (i) the junctional adhesion molecules (12), (ii) homophilic interactions of endothelial and leukocyte platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (41), and (iii) a temporary destruction of the tight junction protein called occludin (48).

Previous work by a few groups, using in vivo and in vitro models, have suggested three possible routes of BBB crossing by C. neoformans, including transcellular passage through endothelial cells, with identification of a specific ligand-receptor interaction (5, 9, 21); a paracellular route between the endothelial cells after mechanical or biochemical disruption of the BBB (6, 9, 46); and finally, a “Trojan horse” method in which cells cross inside a host monocyte.

Several lines of evidence support the existence of the Trojan horse model of BBB crossing. First, C. neoformans is a facultative intracellular pathogen and has been shown to survive and multiply inside phagocytes in vitro (53). Second, C. neoformans can escape alive from phagocytic cells by an active mechanism of phagosomal extrusion and then invade other phagocytes (2, 36). Third, HIV-infected patients have monocyte dysfunction resulting in reduced anticryptococcal activity (19, 38) and present with a much higher rate of fungemia and meningoencephalitis than that for HIV-negative patients (15). Finally, in the murine model of cryptococcosis, yeasts were seen inside what looked like phagocytes on the outer side of a meningeal capillary, suggesting that C. neoformans could have been transported inside circulating phagocytes (10).

Our objective was therefore to demonstrate the existence of a Trojan horse crossing of the BBB by C. neoformans and to evaluate the role of monocytes in fungal dissemination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals.Outbred OF1 male mice aged 5 to 7 weeks (Charles River, l'Arbresle, France) were used for all experiments, except in specific cases involving BALB/c male mice (Janvier, Le Genest-St.-Isle, France). Mice were housed at seven or eight per cage in our animal facilities and received food and water ad libitum. This study was conducted in accordance with the EC guidelines for animal care (18a), and experimental protocols were approved by the local committee.

C. neoformans strains.All experiments were done with C. neoformans var. grubii strain H99, except for coinfection experiments, where KN99α and KN99α NAT were used (44, 45). KN99α and KN99α NAT are congenic strains differing only by the nourseothricin transgene (NAT), which conveys resistance to nourseothricin without modifying the dissemination/virulence properties of the strain (44). This allows specific detection of KN99α NAT colonies in a mix of KN99α and KN99α NAT yeasts by specific growth of the latter on a nourseothricin-containing medium.

Cultures stored at −80°C in 40% glycerol were subcultured on Sabouraud agar and then grown in yeast nitrogen base broth supplemented with 2% glucose (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) for 24 h on a rotary shaker (150 rpm) at 30°C. Yeast cells were harvested, washed three times in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), and resuspended at the appropriate concentration in PBS.

BMDM preparation.Bone marrow-derived monocytes (BMDM) were obtained as previously described by maturation of bone marrow cells in the presence of CSF-1, a growth factor secreted by the L929 cell line (18). Briefly, bone marrow cells were flushed from the central femur and tibia cavities of OF1 mice by use of PBS. Cells were seeded at 2 × 106 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 plus GlutaMAX-I medium (Gibco, Paisley, United Kingdom) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco), and CSF-1 in 75-cm2 tissue culture flasks (Techno Plastic Products, Trasadingen, Switzerland) at 37°C and 5% CO2. Nonadherent cells were then harvested after 6 days of culture.

In vitro phagocytosis.In order to study the role of monocytes in C. neoformans dissemination, we optimized the in vitro phagocytosis method. Experiments were performed in 96-well flat-bottomed tissue culture plates (Techno Plastic Products) at 37°C and 5% CO2. The anti-glucuronoxylomannan immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody E1 was used as a source of opsonin (stock solution at 1.5 mg/ml in PBS) (16). BMDM were added at 106 cells/well. In preliminary experiments, various ratios of BMDM to yeasts (1:10 to 10:1), various E1 concentrations (1.5 to 6 μg/106 yeasts), and various durations of incubation (1 to 3 h) were assessed. As controls, wells containing yeasts plus E1 alone or BMDM alone were incubated under similar conditions. Wells containing yeasts coincubated with BMDM in the presence of E1 (BMDM yeasts), yeasts incubated under the same conditions but without BMDM (free yeasts), or BMDM alone were harvested on ice for further use.

In order to quantify phagocytosed, attached, and free yeasts, as well as yeasts surviving coincubation with BMDM, various experiments were performed. First, microscopic observation was performed to enumerate ingested/attached yeasts or free yeasts. At least four different fields (≥100 yeasts) were counted with a hemocytometer. Second, flow cytometry analysis was performed. Yeast cells were labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) as described previously (6) prior to incubation with BMDM. At the end of the coincubation, the cell suspensions were incubated with allophycocyanin (APC)-labeled anti-CD11b antibodies to detect the BMDM cells (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). Cells were analyzed for dual fluorescence with Cellquest software after acquisition of 10,000 events on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). FITC fluorescence of C. neoformans is known to be partially quenched inside the macrophage's acidic phagolysosome (28), allowing the assessment of the positions of FITC-labeled yeasts with regard to BMDM according to their level of fluorescence. Thus, APC+ FITC− cells were considered free BMDM and APC− FITChigh cells were considered free yeasts. FITClow cells were characterized as phagocytosed yeasts due to partial FITC quenching inside the phagolysosomes. FITChigh/intermediate APC+ cells were considered yeasts adherent to but not internalized by BMDM. Given the quenching associated with internalization, they could also correspond to BMDM containing two yeast cells.

In other experiments, the survival of KN99α yeasts, free or coincubated with BMDM, was studied. Aliquots of 50 μl from the cell suspension were withdrawn at baseline (T0) or after 1 h (T1), 3 h (T3), 6 h (T6), or 24 h (T24) of incubation. The same volume of fresh medium was added at each sampling time. The aliquot was diluted in sterile water, vortexed, and incubated for 1 h at 4°C to release the intracellular yeasts. Appropriate dilutions were plated in duplicate onto Sabouraud agar petri dishes, and CFU were enumerated after 48 h at 30°C. Results were expressed as ratios of CFU of BMDM-KN99α at Tn to CFU of KN99α at T0. Two independent wells were analyzed during at least three independent experiments.

Experimental infections.

Infections were performed by intravenous (i.v.) injection of 100 μl of an inoculum containing 2 × 104 to 2 × 106 yeasts/mouse (see below and Results). The inoculum size was checked by plating appropriate dilutions onto Sabouraud agar-containing petri dishes. Several kinds of experiments were performed to assess different issues, as follows.

  1. The Trojan horse hypothesis was studied by inoculating mice with BMDM-H99 (one injection) or free H99. Mice inoculated with free H99 received in a separate injection the amount of BMDM provided by the injection of BMDM-H99.

  2. The coexistence of Trojan horse crossing and crossing as free yeasts was studied by injecting mice with an inoculum composed of BMDM-KN99α and free KN99α NAT at a 1:1 ratio.

  3. The potential alteration of BBB crossing by a preestablished infection obtained by a high inoculum known to provide parenchymal lesions and BBB disruption at day 2 (d2) postinoculation was studied (6). Two groups of mice were first inoculated at d0 with 2 × 106 KN99α cells and then at d2 with 2 × 104 free KN99α NAT cells (free-d2 group) or with 2 × 104 BMDM-KN99α NAT cells (BMDM-d2 group). Two control groups of naïve mice were inoculated only with 2 × 104 free KN99α NAT cells (free-d0 group) or with 2 × 104 BMDM-KN99α NAT cells (BMDM-d0 group).

  4. Finally, the role of phagocytes at a later stage of fungal dissemination was studied. Clodronate-containing liposomes were used to induce sustained monocyte depletion after the onset of infection. Clodronate (provided by Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) (54) has been shown to induce nearly complete monocyte elimination 18 h after i.v. injection, with progressive monocyte repopulation starting 24 h after injection and reaching normal levels 3 to 4 days later. Thus, to obtain sustained monocyte depletion, clodronate liposomes (200 μl) were injected daily for four consecutive days, starting 72 h after inoculation with 105 H99 yeasts.

In all experiments, animals were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (Sanofi Santé Animale, Libourne, France). Since crossing of the BBB is known to start 6 h after inoculation in this model, animals were sacrificed 1, 6, and 24 h after inoculation to study the early events (experiments 1, 2, and 3) and on day 7 (24 h after the last clodronate injection) to study the late events (experiment 4).

To avoid contamination of tissues by circulating yeasts, infusion with 50 ml sterile saline was done through the left ventricle as described previously (6). The brain, lungs, and spleen were then aseptically removed, weighed, and ground in 1 ml of sterile distilled water. Serial dilutions of the homogenates were plated in duplicate onto Sabouraud agar petri dishes. In the KN99α-KN99α NAT coinfections, the total numbers of KN99α and KN99α NAT colonies (Sabouraud agar) and of KN99α NAT colonies (Sabouraud agar plus nourseothricin at 100 μg/ml) were determined. CFU were enumerated after 48 h at 30°C.

All experiments were repeated at least three times, with three mice per group, unless otherwise specified. Results were expressed as the ratios of the mean CFU/g of organ for the experimental group (BMDM yeasts) to that for the control group (free yeasts) unless otherwise stated (results are means ± standard deviations [SD]).

Statistical analysis.Statistical analysis was performed using the STATA 10.0 statistical package (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX). Variables were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test or the Kruskal-Wallis test, depending on the number of groups. P values of <0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Evidence for the existence of Trojan horse crossing by C. neoformans.In preliminary experiments, phagocytosis by BMDM was optimized in order to limit (i) the number of free yeasts, which would hamper the demonstration of the role of the monocytes in C. neoformans BBB crossing; and (ii) the number of yeast aggregates and of BMDM containing more than two yeast cells, which would make them less likely to enter small capillaries and then to cross the BBB. The experimental conditions did not allow the preparation of an inoculum of >105 yeasts/mouse to avoid BMDM clumping (data not shown) or <2 × 104/mouse because of the threshold of CFU detection.

Both microscopy and flow cytometry showed that a BMDM/yeast ratio of 3:1 in the presence of E1 at 1.5 μg/106 yeasts for 90 min was associated with at least 75% of yeasts being internalized/adherent to BMDM in more than five independent experiments (a representative experiment is shown in Fig. 1). To determine if phagocytosis by BMDM altered fungal multiplication, the viability of KN99α incubated in the presence or absence of BMDM was studied in vitro. CFU were not different in both groups at all times studied (data not shown).

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Representative in vitro phagocytosis of C. neoformans by BMDM. BMDM were incubated with FITC-labeled C. neoformans strain H99 and monoclonal antibody E1 (1.5 μg/106 yeasts) for 90 min at a BMDM/yeast ratio of 3:1. (A) Epifluorescence microscopy. The bright FITC staining is partially quenched after phagocytosis, allowing the distinction between free yeasts (thin arrow), intracellular yeasts (arrowheads), and adherent yeasts (large arrow). Uninfected BMDM (black stars) are also visible. Magnification, ×1,000. (B to D) Flow cytometry analysis of CD11b-APC-labeled BMDM (B), FITC-labeled C. neoformans H99 (C), and BMDM-H99 inoculum prepared as described above (D). CD11b-APC-labeled BMDM are seen in gate R1, free FITC-labeled yeasts (FITChigh APC− cells) are seen in R2, phagocytosed yeasts (FITClow APC+ cells) are seen in R3, and BMDM-adhering yeasts or just internalized yeasts (FITChigh/intermediate APC+ cells) are seen in R4.

We then studied the Trojan horse hypothesis in vivo. Mice inoculated with BMDM-H99 had higher fungal burdens in the spleen and lungs than did control mice inoculated with the same amount of free H99, whatever the time of sacrifice, and this difference was significant 1 h and 24 h after inoculation (CFU ratio, ≥2.0; P = 0.0369). In the brain, fungal loads were similar at 1 h and 6 h in both groups, but they were significantly higher at 24 h for mice inoculated with BMDM-H99 than for those inoculated with free H99 (CFU ratio at 24 h = 3.9; P = 0.0369) (Fig. 2; see Table S1 in the supplemental material).

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

Effect of inoculation with yeasts internalized in monocytes on C. neoformans tissue burden. Mice were inoculated with 2 × 104 BMDM-H99 or 2 × 104 free H99 (free-H99) and sacrificed 1, 6, and 24 h after inoculation. Results are expressed as ratios of the mean CFU/g of organ for the experimental group (BMDM-H99) to that for the control group (free-H99) (data are means ± SD for three mice in each group). The dotted line denotes a ratio of 1. Two independent experiments included the three time points, and the last one included only the 1-h and 24-h study points. *, P < 0.05.

Concomitant BBB crossing of C. neoformans as free cells and by the Trojan horse method.We then designed experiments to determine if the “Trojan horse” hypothesis for BBB crossing could occur together with mechanisms involving free yeasts. The fungal burden of animals inoculated with equal numbers of free KN99α and BMDM-KN99α NAT at a final fungal inoculum of 4 × 104 (one experiment) or 1 × 105 (two experiments) was analyzed.

Both KN99α and KN99α NAT were found in the brain 1, 6, and 24 h after inoculation, with a nonsignificant trend toward more KN99α NAT at all times in the three independent experiments (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). This was confirmed in three mirror experiments with BMDM-KN99α and free KN99α NAT (data not shown).

Monocytes participate in brain invasion by a secondary strain postinfection.We then compared the courses of brain infection after inoculation with BMDM-associated or free KN99α NAT at d0 in two groups of naïve mice (BMDM-d0 or free-d0 group) and at d2 in two groups of mice with previously established cryptococcal infection (BMDM-d2 or free-d2 group).

Viable yeasts were enumerated in all groups 1, 6, and 24 h after inoculation (Fig. 3). CFU enumerated in the brains of mice with preestablished infection were significantly lower than those in the brains of naïve mice, and this was true for mice inoculated with free yeasts or BMDM yeasts at 1 h and 24 h postinoculation (P = 0.0495). Fungal loads measured in the brains of BMDM-d2 mice were significantly higher than those in free-d2 mice at 6 h postinoculation (P = 0.0495). The kinetics over the 24 h differed between the four groups. The increase in CFU recorded at 6 h compared to that at 1 h postinoculation was 5-fold for BMDM-d2 mice, compared to 1.9-fold for BMDM-D0 mice, 1.8-fold for free-d2 mice, and 1.3-fold for free-d0 mice, suggesting differences in yeast multiplication or BBB crossing.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Effect of established cryptococcal infection on brain invasion by a second isolate of C. neoformans. Inoculation with 2 × 104 free KN99α NAT or BMDM-KN99α NAT cells was done on day 0 to naïve mice (free-d0 or BMDM-d0 group) or mice injected 2 days before with 2 × 106 KN99α cells (free-d2 or BMDM-d2 group), as summarized in the table. Mice were sacrificed 1, 6, and 24 h thereafter. Results are expressed as CFU/g of brain (data are means ± SD for three mice). Only CFU data resulting from KN99α NAT inoculation are presented.

Delayed and sustained phagocyte depletion reduces fungal dissemination.Fungemia can occur after transient clearance of the yeasts, suggesting that yeasts can recirculate freely or be associated with phagocytes (32). The BMDM yeast approach was useless to answer the question of the role of phagocytes at later stages of the infection, whereas phagocyte depletion seemed more appropriate. Sustained phagocyte depletion was performed during an already disseminated cryptococcal infection, and mice were sacrificed on day 7 after inoculation (Fig. 4; see Table S2 in the supplemental material). All control animals were ill, with ruffled hair and numerous macroscopic abscesses in the brain and spleen at autopsy. Mice injected with clodronate were clinically less ill and had fewer or no visible macroscopic abscesses. Spleens from control mice were significantly heavier than those from clodronate-injected mice (169 ± 13 mg versus 126 ± 7 mg; P = 0.016). In depleted mice, fungal burdens were reduced >40% in all organs studied, including the brain, compared to those in control mice (P = 0.039; pooled results from two independent experiments involving outbred OF1 mice and one experiment using BALB/c mice).

FIG. 4.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 4.

Effects of delayed and sustained monocyte depletion on the course of cryptococcal infection. (A) Mice were infected with 105 H99 yeasts and treated by daily i.v. infection with clodronate liposomes (depleted group) or with PBS (control group) for 4 days. Macroscopic examination of representative organs from mice in the control group showed multiple abscesses in the spleen (B) and hemorrhages in the brain (D), but mice in the depleted group showed no visible lesions in the spleen (C) or the brain (E). (F) Ratios of fungal loads measured in the spleens, lungs, and brains of depleted and control mice (data are means ± SD for three animals per group from three independent experiments).

DISCUSSION

As discussed for bacterial or viral pathogens (25, 47), several mutually exclusive or concomitant mechanisms are thought to allow BBB crossing by C. neoformans. Transcellular passage through endothelial cells has been demonstrated in vitro (5) and evidenced in vivo during experimental cryptococcosis (10). Paracellular passage requires disruption of the BBB by mechanisms that are mostly unknown during cryptococcosis. C. neoformans could secrete proteases that could alter the integrity of the BBB (8, 46, 49). Sequestration of the yeasts in the cortical capillaries could produce mechanical disruption, and enzymes such as urease could participate in this event (46). Furthermore, secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor has been observed during cryptococcosis (11), and it is known to be associated with BBB leakage. Whatever the mechanisms involved, the extensive damage to the endothelial layer and BBB leakage observed in vivo (6) could allow translocation of yeasts, either freely or inside blood monocytes.

The Trojan horse hypothesis has been evoked but never demonstrated until now. Most experimental studies have focused on the role of lung macrophages as a vector for C. neoformans dissemination and possibly for BBB crossing in models using virulence-altered yeasts (22, 23, 34, 49). In the clinical setting, however, patent pneumonia is often lacking, which could limit the role of alveolar macrophages, while fungemia is reported for almost 50% of HIV-infected patients (15). HIV infection was recently shown to increase the capacity of peripheral monocytes to cross the BBB into the brain (56), potentially contributing to the larger proportion of meningoencephalitis cases in HIV-positive than in HIV-negative patients (15). In our experimental model, yeasts have been observed in the blood, circulating either inside mononuclear cells or freely (10, 32). The magnitude of fungemia recorded on day 1 postinoculation is correlated with brain, spleen, and lung burdens (32), making the peripheral monocyte a potential “vector” for fungal dissemination and brain invasion. In a study by Kawakami et al., there was no reduction in cerebral infection when mice treated with anti-CD11b antibodies were inoculated i.v. to study the role of phagocytes in the blood in brain passage (22). However, the effect of the anti-CD11b treatment on circulating monocytes or fungemia was not assessed. In another study, H99-infected monocytes induced brain infection in one of three recipient mice after i.v. inoculation, in contrast to three of three mice inoculated with H99-infected alveolar macrophages (49). However, in these experiments, monocytes were 300-fold less infected than the alveolar macrophages. Thus, the role of monocytes in dissemination and BBB crossing was still unclear.

The use of cultured BMDM and the assessment of conditions leading to a reproducible and high level of infection with C. neoformans allowed us to demonstrate a role of monocytes in fungal dissemination and BBB crossing by C. neoformans. However, our study has some limitations that need to be mentioned. First, the fungal load measured in tissue by CFU enumeration is the result of tissue invasion, yeast multiplication, and the host response. The maximum number of BMDM injected/mouse was under the threshold of histological detection, thus preventing direct observation of yeast transport by monocytes and control of the fact that when they crossed, yeasts were still inside monocytes. The fact that BMDM yeasts tended to multiply less than free yeasts under our in vitro conditions probably ruled out the possibility of better proliferation inside BMDM, as described for other conditions with monocyte-derived human macrophages (14). Second, despite the high level of phagocytosis achieved (>75%), the free yeasts present in the inoculum could have blurred the final “picture.” Additionally, C. neoformans has been shown in vitro to escape from macrophages, which could have modified the proportion of free/phagocytosed yeasts in the inoculum (2, 36). However, the escaping phenomenon involved <10% of the phagocytes and was more frequent with human macrophages than with murine macrophages and with Clostridium gattii than with C. neoformans (35). Finally, depending on the inoculum preparation, different fungal and host genes could be triggered, modifying fungal multiplication or survival, as suggested by others (49). Nevertheless, we observed a reproducible threefold increase in the fungal burden measured in the brain 24 h after inoculation with BMDM- associated yeasts compared to the burden after inoculation with free yeasts. This suggests that the Trojan horse hypothesis is valid for C. neoformans crossing of the BBB.

Since other means of BBB crossing involving free yeasts have been evoked or demonstrated, we studied their coexistence with Trojan horse crossing by using resistant and susceptible yeasts of equal virulence (44), injected together either as free cells or associated with BMDM. Both BMDM-associated and free yeasts were detected in the brain, with a trend toward a larger number of BMDM-associated ones at all times studied. These experiments, together with other experiments involving various mutants or congenic strains (43, 44), suggest that multiple strains can invade the brain concomitantly. These data support the idea that mixed infections can occur in humans (37) and that C. neoformans can use multiple means of crossing.

We then wondered if prior brain infection by C. neoformans could alter the subsequent kinetics of BBB crossing by a second strain. Prior infection could modify several parameters that could subsequently interfere with BBB crossing and fungal multiplication, including (i) disruption of the BBB and its tight junctions between endothelial cells and modification of the endothelial surface, which could increase BBB crossing (6); and (ii) alteration of local immunity, with diminished secretion of chemokines by endothelial cells, as demonstrated in vitro (40). Whatever the underlying mechanisms, prior infection modified the course of brain invasion by a second strain. A smaller number of yeast cells was recovered from the brain, regardless of the inoculum preparation (BMDM-associated or free yeasts), than what was observed with the same inoculum in naïve mice at all time points except the 6-h time point. As demonstrated in naïve mice, inoculation with BMDM yeasts still increased the fungal load in the brain compared to inoculation with free yeasts in the setting of prior infection. Moreover, CFU recovered from the brains of mice secondarily inoculated with BMDM yeasts (BMDM-d2 group) were higher (2.5 times) than those expected from the data obtained for mice inoculated with free yeasts (free-d2 group). These data suggest increased or earlier BBB crossing, since yeast multiplication in the brain has been shown to occur after BBB crossing in this model (6). Overall, our results provide further evidence of the existence of monocyte-associated crossing of the BBB by C. neoformans. They suggest, however, that when mixed infections occur in humans, they may be more likely to occur at once than to represent subsequent reinfection. Studies are now required to further dissect the molecular events associated with BBB crossing by C. neoformans and to study how the modification of local immunity affects interactions of yeasts with the BBB.

Beyond its involvement in early BBB crossing, the monocyte also appeared to be an early dissemination vector in these experiments. The kinetics of fungal load after inoculation with BMDM-associated yeasts differed in the spleens and lungs from what was observed in the brain. Indeed, more yeasts were recovered in the spleen and lungs as soon as 1 h after inoculation of mice inoculated with BMDM yeasts than from those inoculated with free yeasts, while this was observed only at 24 h in the brain. This discrepancy could be related to functional differences of leukocyte-trafficking targets, between the “immunological sanctuary” with limited cell trafficking (brain) and the “filter” organs with intensive circulation of immune cells (spleen and lungs), rather than to differences in capillary bed structures, since both the lungs and the brain share a continuous bed structure (24). This discrepancy is reminiscent of previous experiments in which fungal loads progressed differently in these three organs (32) and crossing of the various endothelia by yeasts was associated with rapid changes in the capsule structure which varied depending on the organ seeded (6). Our results suggest that monocytes have a role in fungal dissemination and brain invasion but that molecular events could differ depending on the organ invaded.

Cryptococcal infection is associated with limited inflammation, but low concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha, gamma interferon, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1, during cryptococcosis could enhance leukocyte recruitment and subsequent organ reseeding by infected phagocytes (1, 20, 29, 30, 55). In experiments performed in the early 1980s, Monga showed that depletion of tissue macrophages by treatment with silica prior to infection enhanced susceptibility to infection (39). Using different experimental designs and more recent tools, others have demonstrated the role of tissue macrophages in fungal dissemination (23, 34, 49). In our experiments, late phagocyte (blood monocyte plus circulating phagocyte) depletion obtained by clodronate injections (27, 52) consistently reduced clinical manifestations and fungal burdens in all organs studied. Previous data from our group demonstrated that late fungemia can occur even after transient clearance of the yeasts, suggesting the possibility of blood seeding from infected tissues (32). The presence of intracellular yeasts visualized in infected tissues suggests a role for phagocytes in recirculation (10). The diminution of fungal load in all organs studied provides further evidence of this phenomenon. It also suggests that reseeding was equally reduced, regardless of organ function and endothelium structure. Clodronate is known to induce concomitant depletion of tissue macrophages, but no information is available concerning depletion of perivascular macrophages after i.v. injection (27, 52). Overall, the role of phagocytes is complex (13). We show here again the predominant role of phagocytes in reseeding tissues rather than eradicating yeasts (50). This could have interesting implications for vaccine development. Indeed, by driving C. neoformans into phagocytes, antibodies to capsular antigens could promote organ dissemination with these “Trojan horses.” Knowing that tissue lesions observed during immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome contain yeasts inside CD68+ cells, one could also raise the question of whether phagocyte-mediated reseeding participates in the severe clinical manifestations related to this syndrome in the setting of HIV infection or solid organ transplantation (31, 51).

Our data provide strong evidence for Trojan horse crossing of the BBB by C. neoformans, together with other mechanisms involving free yeasts, and the detrimental effect of phagocytes on the course of cryptococcosis. C. neoformans has well-known antiphagocytic, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory properties (13). The monocyte subversion reported here appears to be another effective tool to escape the host defenses.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The financial support of CANAM APHP CNRS to Caroline Charlier is gratefully acknowledged.

We thank N. Van Rooijen for providing clodronate liposomes and Yasmine Baba Amer for technical help.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 27 August 2008.
    • Returned for modification 11 September 2008.
    • Accepted 8 October 2008.
  • Copyright © 2009 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Aguirre, K., E. A. Havell, G. W. Gibson, and L. L. Johnson. 1995. Role of tumor necrosis factor and gamma interferon in acquired resistance to Cryptococcus neoformans in the central nervous system of mice. Infect. Immun.63:1725-1731.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Alvarez, M., and A. Casadevall. 2006. Phagosome extrusion and host-cell survival after Cryptococcus neoformans phagocytosis by macrophages. Curr. Biol.16:2161-2165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  3. 3.↵
    Brandt, C. T., D. Holm, M. Liptrot, C. Ostergaard, J. D. Lundgren, N. Frimodt-Moller, I. C. Skovsted, and I. J. Rowland. 2008. Impact of bacteremia on the pathogenesis of experimental pneumococcal meningitis. J. Infect. Dis.197:235-244.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Casadevall, A., and J. R. Perfect. 1998. Cryptococcus neoformans.American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
  5. 5.↵
    Chang, Y. C., M. F. Stins, M. J. McCaffery, G. F. Miller, D. R. Pare, T. Dam, M. Paul-Satyaseela, K. S. Kim, and K. J. Kwon-Chung. 2004. Cryptococcal yeast cells invade the central nervous system via transcellular penetration of the blood-brain barrier. Infect. Immun.72:4985-4995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    Charlier, C., F. Chretien, M. Baudrimont, E. Mordelet, O. Lortholary, and F. Dromer. 2005. Capsule structure changes associated with Cryptococcus neoformans crossing of the blood-brain barrier. Am. J. Pathol.166:421-432.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  7. 7.↵
    Charlier, C., F. Dromer, C. Leveque, L. Chartier, Y. S. Cordoliani, A. Fontanet, O. Launay, and O. Lortholary. 2008. Cryptococcal neuroradiological lesions correlate with severity during cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in HIV-positive patients in the HAART era. PLoS ONE3:e1950.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Chen, L. C., E. S. Blank, and A. Casadevall. 1996. Extracellular proteinase activity of Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.3:570-574.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Chen, S. H., M. F. Stins, S. H. Huang, Y. H. Chen, K. J. Kwon-Chung, Y. Chang, K. S. Kim, K. Suzuki, and A. Y. Jong. 2003. Cryptococcus neoformans induces alterations in the cytoskeleton of human brain microvascular endothelial cells. J. Med. Microbiol.52:961-970.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. 10.↵
    Chretien, F., O. Lortholary, I. Kansau, S. Neuville, F. Gray, and F. Dromer. 2002. Pathogenesis of cerebral Cryptococcus neoformans infection after fungemia. J. Infect. Dis.186:522-530.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Coenjaerts, F. E., M. van der Flier, P. N. Mwinzi, A. E. Brouwer, J. Scharringa, W. S. Chaka, M. Aarts, A. Rajanuwong, D. A. van de Vijver, T. S. Harrison, and A. I. Hoepelman. 2004. Intrathecal production and secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor during cryptococcal meningitis. J. Infect. Dis.190:1310-1317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  12. 12.↵
    Del Maschio, A., A. De Luigi, I. Martin-Padura, M. Brockhaus, T. Bartfai, P. Fruscella, L. Adorini, G. Martino, R. Furlan, M. G. De Simoni, and E. Dejana. 1999. Leukocyte recruitment in the cerebrospinal fluid of mice with experimental meningitis is inhibited by an antibody to junctional adhesion molecule (JAM). J. Exp. Med.190:1351-1356.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    Del Poeta, M. 2004. Role of phagocytosis in the virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. Eukaryot. Cell3:1067-1075.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    Diamond, R. D., and J. E. Bennett. 1973. Growth of Cryptococcus neoformans within human macrophages in vitro. Infect. Immun.7:231-236.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    Dromer, F., S. Mathoulin-Pelissier, O. Launay, and O. Lortholary. 2007. Determinants of disease presentation and outcome during cryptococcosis: the CryptoA/D Study. PLoS Med.4:e21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    Dromer, F., J. Salamero, A. Contrepois, C. Carbon, and P. Yeni. 1987. Production, characterization, and antibody specificity of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with Cryptococcus neoformans capsular polysaccharide. Infect. Immun.55:742-748.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    Eisenman, H. C., A. Casadevall, and E. E. McClelland. 2007. New insights on the pathogenesis of invasive Cryptococcus neoformans infection. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep.9:457-464.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    Englen, M. D., Y. E. Valdez, N. M. Lehnert, and B. E. Lehnert. 1995. Granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor is expressed and secreted in cultures of murine L929 cells. J. Immunol. Methods184:281-283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  19. 18a.↵
    European Economic Community Council Directive. 1986. On the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. J. Off. Commun. Eur.1986:L358.
    OpenUrl
  20. 19.↵
    Harrison, T. S., and S. M. Levitz. 1997. Mechanisms of impaired anticryptococcal activity of monocytes from donors infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J. Infect. Dis.176:537-540.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  21. 20.↵
    Huffnagle, G. B., R. M. Strieter, T. J. Standiford, R. A. McDonald, M. D. Burdick, S. L. Kunkel, and G. B. Toews. 1995. The role of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) in the recruitment of monocytes and CD4+ T cells during a pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection. J. Immunol.155:4790-4797.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  22. 21.↵
    Jong, A., C. H. Wu, G. M. Shackleford, K. J. Kwon-Chung, Y. C. Chang, H. M. Chen, Y. Ouyang, and S. H. Huang. 2008. Involvement of human CD44 during Cryptococcus neoformans infection of brain microvascular endothelial cells. Cell. Microbiol.10:1313-1326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 22.↵
    Kawakami, K., Y. Koguchi, M. H. Qureshi, T. Zhang, Y. Kinjo, S. Yara, K. Uezu, K. Shibuya, S. Naoe, and A. Saito. 2002. Anti-CD11b monoclonal antibody suppresses brain dissemination of Cryptococcus neoformans in mice. Microbiol. Immunol.46:181-186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 23.↵
    Kechichian, T. B., J. Shea, and M. Del Poeta. 2007. Depletion of alveolar macrophages decreases the dissemination of a glucosylceramide-deficient mutant of Cryptococcus neoformans in immunodeficient mice. Infect. Immun.75:4792-4798.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. 24.↵
    Kierszenbaum, A. 2001. Histology and cell biology, 2nd ed., vol. 1. Elsevier Health Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  26. 25.↵
    Kim, K. S. 2003. Pathogenesis of bacterial meningitis: from bacteraemia to neuronal injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.4:376-385.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 26.↵
    Lee, S. C., D. W. Dickson, and A. Casadevall. 1996. Pathology of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis: analysis of 27 patients with pathogenetic implications. Hum. Pathol.27:839-847.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 27.↵
    Leenen, P. J., J. S. Voerman, K. Radosevic, N. van Rooijen, and W. van Ewijk. 1997. Mouse spleen dendritic cells. Phagocytic activity and expression of macrophage markers. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.417:91-95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 28.↵
    Levitz, S. M., S. H. Nong, K. F. Seetoo, T. S. Harrison, R. A. Speizer, and E. R. Simons. 1999. Cryptococcus neoformans resides in an acidic phagolysosome of human macrophages. Infect. Immun.67:885-890.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 29.↵
    Levitz, S. M., E. A. North, Y. Jiang, S. H. Nong, H. Kornfeld, and T. S. Harrison. 1997. Variables affecting production of monocyte chemotactic factor 1 from human leukocytes stimulated with Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect. Immun.65:903-908.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 30.↵
    Lortholary, O., F. Dromer, S. Mathoulin-Pelissier, C. Fitting, L. Improvisi, J. M. Cavaillon, and B. Dupont. 2001. Immune mediators in cerebrospinal fluid during cryptococcosis are influenced by meningeal involvement and human immunodeficiency virus serostatus. J. Infect. Dis.183:294-302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  32. 31.↵
    Lortholary, O., A. Fontanet, N. Memain, A. Martin, K. Sitbon, and F. Dromer. 2005. Incidence and risk factors of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome complicating HIV-associated cryptococcosis in France. AIDS19:1043-1049.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 32.↵
    Lortholary, O., L. Improvisi, M. Nicolas, F. Provost, B. Dupont, and F. Dromer. 1999. Fungemia during murine cryptococcosis sheds some light on pathophysiology. Med. Mycol.37:169-174.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. 33.↵
    Lortholary, O., G. Poizat, V. Zeller, S. Neuville, A. Boibieux, M. Alvarez, P. Dellamonica, F. Botterel, F. Dromer, and G. Chene. 2006. Long-term outcome of AIDS-associated cryptococcosis in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS20:2183-2191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  35. 34.↵
    Luberto, C., B. Martinez-Marino, D. Taraskiewicz, B. Bolanos, P. Chitano, D. L. Toffaletti, G. M. Cox, J. R. Perfect, Y. A. Hannun, E. Balish, and M. Del Poeta. 2003. Identification of App1 as a regulator of phagocytosis and virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Clin. Investig.112:1080-1094.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 35.↵
    Ma, H., J. E. Croudace, D. A. Lammas, and R. C. May. 2007. Direct cell-to-cell spread of a pathogenic yeast. BMC Immunol.8:15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 36.↵
    Ma, H., J. E. Croudace, D. A. Lammas, and R. C. May. 2006. Expulsion of live pathogenic yeast by macrophages. Curr. Biol.16:2156-2160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  38. 37.↵
    Mandal, P., U. Banerjee, A. Casadevall, and J. D. Nosanchuk. 2005. Dual infections with pigmented and albino strains of Cryptococcus neoformans in patients with or without human immunodeficiency virus infection in India. J. Clin. Microbiol.43:4766-4772.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 38.↵
    Monari, C., F. Baldelli, D. Pietrella, C. Retini, C. Tascini, D. Francisci, F. Bistoni, and A. Vecchiarelli. 1997. Monocyte dysfunction in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) versus Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Infect.35:257-263.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  40. 39.↵
    Monga, D. P. 1981. Role of macrophages in resistance of mice to experimental cryptococcosis. Infect. Immun.32:975-978.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 40.↵
    Mozaffarian, N., A. Casadevall, and J. W. Berman. 2000. Inhibition of human endothelial cell chemokine production by the opportunistic fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Immunol.165:1541-1547.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 41.↵
    Muller, W. A., and G. J. Randolph. 1999. Migration of leukocytes across endothelium and beyond: molecules involved in the transmigration and fate of monocytes. J. Leukoc. Biol.66:698-704.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  43. 42.↵
    Nassif, X., S. Bourdoulous, E. Eugene, and P. O. Couraud. 2002. How do extracellular pathogens cross the blood-brain barrier? Trends Microbiol.10:227-232.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 43.↵
    Nelson, R. T., J. Hua, B. Pryor, and J. K. Lodge. 2001. Identification of virulence mutants of the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans using signature-tagged mutagenesis. Genetics157:935-947.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 44.↵
    Nielsen, K., G. M. Cox, A. P. Litvintseva, E. Mylonakis, S. D. Malliaris, D. K. Benjamin, Jr., S. S. Giles, T. G. Mitchell, A. Casadevall, J. R. Perfect, and J. Heitman. 2005. Cryptococcus neoformans α strains preferentially disseminate to the central nervous system during coinfection. Infect. Immun.73:4922-4933.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. 45.↵
    Nielsen, K., G. M. Cox, P. Wang, D. L. Toffaletti, J. R. Perfect, and J. Heitman. 2003. Sexual cycle of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii and virulence of congenic a and α isolates. Infect. Immun.71:4831-4841.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  47. 46.↵
    Olszewski, M. A., M. C. Noverr, G. H. Chen, G. B. Toews, G. M. Cox, J. R. Perfect, and G. B. Huffnagle. 2004. Urease expression by Cryptococcus neoformans promotes microvascular sequestration, thereby enhancing central nervous system invasion. Am. J. Pathol.164:1761-1771.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 47.↵
    Paterson, R. 2005. How West Nile virus crosses the blood-brain barrier. Lancet Neurol.4:18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. 48.↵
    Reijerkerk, A., G. Kooij, S. M. van der Pol, S. Khazen, C. D. Dijkstra, and H. E. de Vries. 2006. Diapedesis of monocytes is associated with MMP-mediated occludin disappearance in brain endothelial cells. FASEB J.20:2550-2552.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. 49.↵
    Santangelo, R., H. Zoellner, T. Sorrell, C. Wilson, C. Donald, J. Djordjevic, Y. Shounan, and L. Wright. 2004. Role of extracellular phospholipases and mononuclear phagocytes in dissemination of cryptococcosis in a murine model. Infect. Immun.72:2229-2239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. 50.↵
    Shea, J. M., T. B. Kechichian, C. Luberto, and M. Del Poeta. 2006. The cryptococcal enzyme inositol phosphosphingolipid-phospholipase C confers resistance to the antifungal effects of macrophages and promotes fungal dissemination to the central nervous system. Infect. Immun.74:5977-5988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. 51.↵
    Singh, N., O. Lortholary, B. D. Alexander, K. L. Gupta, G. T. John, K. Pursell, P. Munoz, G. B. Klintmalm, V. Stosor, R. del Busto, A. P. Limaye, J. Somani, M. Lyon, S. Houston, A. A. House, T. L. Pruett, S. Orloff, A. Humar, L. Dowdy, J. Garcia-Diaz, A. C. Kalil, R. A. Fisher, and S. Husain. 2005. An immune reconstitution syndrome-like illness associated with Cryptococcus neoformans infection in organ transplant recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis.40:1756-1761.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  53. 52.↵
    Sunderkotter, C., T. Nikolic, M. J. Dillon, N. Van Rooijen, M. Stehling, D. A. Drevets, and P. J. Leenen. 2004. Subpopulations of mouse blood monocytes differ in maturation stage and inflammatory response. J. Immunol.172:4410-4417.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. 53.↵
    Tucker, S. C., and A. Casadevall. 2002. Replication of Cryptococcus neoformans in macrophages is accompanied by phagosomal permeabilization and accumulation of vesicles containing polysaccharide in the cytoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99:3165-3170.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 54.↵
    Van Rooijen, N., and A. Sanders. 1994. Liposome mediated depletion of macrophages: mechanism of action, preparation of liposomes and applications. J. Immunol. Methods174:83-93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  56. 55.↵
    Walenkamp, A. M., W. S. Chaka, A. F. Verheul, V. V. Vaishnav, R. Cherniak, F. E. Coenjaerts, and I. M. Hoepelman. 1999. Cryptococcus neoformans and its cell wall components induce similar cytokine profiles in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells despite differences in structure. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol.26:309-318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 56.↵
    Wang, H., J. Sun, and H. Goldstein. 2008. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection increases the in vivo capacity of peripheral monocytes to cross the blood-brain barrier into the brain and the in vivo sensitivity of the blood-brain barrier to disruption by lipopolysaccharide. J. Virol.82:7591-7600.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Evidence of a Role for Monocytes in Dissemination and Brain Invasion by Cryptococcus neoformans
Caroline Charlier, Kirsten Nielsen, Samira Daou, Madly Brigitte, Fabrice Chretien, Françoise Dromer
Infection and Immunity Dec 2008, 77 (1) 120-127; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01065-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evidence of a Role for Monocytes in Dissemination and Brain Invasion by Cryptococcus neoformans
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Evidence of a Role for Monocytes in Dissemination and Brain Invasion by Cryptococcus neoformans
Caroline Charlier, Kirsten Nielsen, Samira Daou, Madly Brigitte, Fabrice Chretien, Françoise Dromer
Infection and Immunity Dec 2008, 77 (1) 120-127; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01065-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

cryptococcosis
Cryptococcus neoformans
meningoencephalitis
monocytes

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522