Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Microbial Immunity and Vaccines

Memory T-Cell Responses to Vibrio cholerae O1 Infection

Ana A. Weil, Mohammad Arifuzzaman, Taufiqur R. Bhuiyan, Regina C. LaRocque, Aaron M. Harris, Emily A. Kendall, Azim Hossain, Abdullah A. Tarique, Alaullah Sheikh, Fahima Chowdhury, Ashraful I. Khan, Farhan Murshed, Kenneth C. Parker, Kalyan K. Banerjee, Edward T. Ryan, Jason B. Harris, Firdausi Qadri, Stephen B. Calderwood
Ana A. Weil
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohammad Arifuzzaman
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taufiqur R. Bhuiyan
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Regina C. LaRocque
2Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
3Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron M. Harris
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily A. Kendall
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Azim Hossain
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Abdullah A. Tarique
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alaullah Sheikh
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fahima Chowdhury
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashraful I. Khan
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Farhan Murshed
2Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth C. Parker
4Virgin Instruments, Sudbury, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kalyan K. Banerjee
5Division of Biochemistry, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Kolkata, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edward T. Ryan
2Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
3Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
6Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason B. Harris
2Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
7Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Firdausi Qadri
1International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephen B. Calderwood
2Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
3Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
8Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: scalderwood@partners.org
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00793-09
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Vibrio cholerae O1 can cause diarrheal disease that may be life-threatening without treatment. Natural infection results in long-lasting protective immunity, but the role of T cells in this immune response has not been well characterized. In contrast, robust B-cell responses to V. cholerae infection have been observed. In particular, memory B-cell responses to T-cell-dependent antigens persist for at least 1 year, whereas responses to lipopolysaccharide, a T-cell-independent antigen, wane more rapidly after infection. We hypothesize that protective immunity is mediated by anamnestic responses of memory B cells in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue, and T-cell responses may be required to generate and maintain durable memory B-cell responses. In this study, we examined B- and T-cell responses in patients with severe V. cholerae infection. Using the flow cytometric assay of the specific cell-mediated immune response in activated whole blood, we measured antigen-specific T-cell responses using V. cholerae antigens, including the toxin-coregulated pilus (TcpA), a V. cholerae membrane preparation, and the V. cholerae cytolysin/hemolysin (VCC) protein. Our results show that memory T-cell responses develop by day 7 after infection, a time prior to and concurrent with the development of B-cell responses. This suggests that T-cell responses to V. cholerae antigens may be important for the generation and stability of memory B-cell responses. The T-cell proliferative response to VCC was of a higher magnitude than responses observed to other V. cholerae antigens.

Vibrio cholerae is a gram-negative bacterium that can cause a severe, acute secretory diarrhea. Serological differentiation of V. cholerae strains is based on the O-side chain of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) component of the outer membrane. Of the more than 200 serogroups of V. cholerae identified, only the O1 and O139 serogroups can cause epidemic cholera (44). These pathogens are noninvasive and colonize the mucosal surface of the small intestine (44).

Natural infection with V. cholerae is known to provide protection against subsequent disease, but the mechanism of this protective immunity is not fully characterized. The vibriocidal antibody is a complement-dependent bactericidal antibody that is associated with protection from infection. However, no known threshold level of the vibriocidal antibody confers complete protection from V. cholerae infection, and some individuals with low serum vibriocidal antibody titers are still protected. This suggests that the vibriocidal titer may be a surrogate marker (16, 45). Elevated serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody levels specific for the B subunit of cholera toxin (CTB), the major structural subunit of a type IV pilus (TcpA), and LPS are also associated with protective immunity in areas where cholera is endemic (19). However, after natural infection, the serum levels of these antibodies wane more rapidly than protective immunity (19). Patients with cholera develop memory B-cell responses of both the IgG and the IgA isotype to at least two V. cholerae protein antigens, CTB and TcpA. These responses are detectable for at least 1 year after infection and persist even after V. cholerae antigen-specific antibody-secreting cells and serum antibody titers have returned to baseline (18). B-cell memory responses also develop for the T-cell independent antigen LPS, but these responses wane more rapidly than memory B-cell responses to protein antigens, suggesting that durable memory B-cell responses to some V. cholerae antigens may be T-cell dependent (18).

We have recently demonstrated that cholera patients mount a primed T-cell response in the mucosa after V. cholerae O1 infection (6). We hypothesize that protection from cholera may be mediated by memory B cells capable of an anamnestic response in the gut mucosa and that these memory B cells may depend on stimulation provided by memory T cells for their development and maintenance. T cells may contribute to the activation of B cells during V. cholerae infection by secreting stimulatory cytokines and direct contact with B cells in lymph nodes. Therefore, T cells may have an important role in protective immunity to V. cholerae infection.

We characterized the memory T-cell responses to V. cholerae antigens following natural V. cholerae infection and compared these with serological responses to the same antigens. Previously, our group has studied various V. cholerae antigens, including mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin, TcpA, CTB, and LPS (22, 33, 37). We also included in the present study responses to a novel antigen, V. cholerae cytolysin/hemolysin (VCC) (31, 32). The hly gene that encodes the VCC protein is widespread across both pathogenic and environmental strains of V. cholerae, suggesting that VCC may impart an advantage to the organism (42). Although the precise role of VCC in V. cholerae infection is unknown, VCC is the primary virulence factor in V. cholerae infection with non-O1, non-O139 strains that do not produce cholera toxin (12, 46). The immune response to VCC is not well understood; however, recent studies suggest that VCC may promote a Th2 response in V. cholerae infection (2). In addition, the cytolytic activity of VCC may generate epithelial destruction that allows other V. cholerae antigens to penetrate the mucosa and promote the inflammatory response observed in V. cholerae infection (35, 39).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study subjects and overview.The International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B) Dhaka hospital cares for over 20,000 cholera patients annually, most of whom are residents of Dhaka city. Patients older than 6 months who had a positive stool culture for V. cholerae and were without significant comorbid conditions were eligible for inclusion in the present study. All of the participants included presented with severe, acute watery diarrhea and required treatment with intravenous fluids. The study participants were also treated with antibiotics. Individuals with similar socioeconomic backgrounds as patients and who experienced no diarrheal illness in the previous 3 months were selected as healthy controls. For patients, blood samples were obtained during acute infection (the second day of hospitalization) and on days 7 and 30 during the convalescent period. At each time point, T-cell lymphoblast proliferation was measured in response to ex vivo antigenic stimulation with a membrane preparation from V. cholerae O1 (MP), TcpA, VCC, or V. cholerae LPS. These antigens are described in detail below. In addition, vibriocidal titers and serologic responses to antigens TcpA, VCC, and the homologous LPS (V. cholerae-specific serotypes Inaba or Ogawa) were performed. Study participants were enrolled after providing written informed consent. The Research and Ethical Review Committee of the ICDDR,B and the Institutional Review Board of Massachusetts General Hospital approved the present study. The human experimentation guidelines of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services were followed during the conduct of this research.

Bacteriological examination of patient stools.Cases were confirmed by culturing stool onto taurocholate-tellurite-gelatin and MacConkey agar (28). After overnight incubation of plates, suspected V. cholerae colonies were serologically confirmed by slide agglutination with specific monoclonal antibody for Ogawa or Inaba serotypes (34, 41).

V. cholerae-specific stimulating antigens and controls.A V. cholerae MP was made from the sequenced O1 El Tor strain N16961 grown in vitro in AKI medium (21). Specifically, a culture of N16961 was inoculated into 1 liter of AKI medium (21). The culture was grown in nonaerating conditions to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.3 and then transferred to shaking conditions for growth to stationary phase. Bacteria were pelleted by centrifuging and then sonicated. The sonicated mixture was centrifuged at 1,400 × g for 10 min, and the remaining supernatant was then centrifuged at 14,900 × g for 30 min. The pellet containing the membrane fraction was then suspended in MgCl2-Tris buffer (5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris [pH 8.0]) for subsequent experiments. Mass spectrometry analysis indicated that the MP contains a mixture of bacterial proteins, and the most abundant of these proteins are listed in Table 1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1.

Proteins represented in the V. cholerae membrane preparation and abundance of selected virulence proteins

The VCC monomer was used for V. cholerae-specific antigenic stimulation at a concentration of 2.5 ng/ml. We used VCC purified from a non-O1 clinical strain of V. cholerae; this protein is known to be immunologically and biochemically identical to V. cholerae O1 VCC (50). Isolation and purification was conducted as previously described (10). Recombinant TcpA, prepared as described previously, was used at a concentration of 2.5 μg/ml (3). V. cholerae O1 Inaba or Ogawa LPS, matched to the case serotype, was used at a concentration of 2.5 μg/ml. Preparation of V. cholerae O1 LPS was conducted as previously described (33). Positive controls for the assay included purified protein derivative (Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark) and phytohemagglutinin (Murex, Remel, Sweden) at concentrations of 5 and 1 μg/ml, respectively. Samples containing unstimulated cells were also included.

Measurement of V. cholerae antigen-specific antibodies in serum and lymphocyte supernatants.Vibriocidal antibody assays were performed as previously described using guinea pig complement and the homologous matched serotype of V. cholerae El Tor Ogawa (X-25049) or El Tor Inaba (T-19479) as the target organism (38). The vibriocidal titer was defined as the reciprocal of the highest serum dilution resulting in >50% reduction of the optical density compared to the optical density of control wells without serum. Seroconversion was defined as a ≥4-fold increase in vibriocidal titer after acute dehydrating diarrhea.

LPS-, TcpA-, and VCC-specific IgG and IgA in serum samples were quantified by using standardized enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) procedures as previously described (36, 40). For anti-TcpA detection, ELISA plates were coated with TcpA (1 μg/ml) in carbonate buffer (50 mM, pH 9.6). For LPS- and VCC-specific responses, ELISA plates were coated with 2.5 μg of antigen/ml in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 10 mM, pH 7.2). Sera were diluted 1:100 for TcpA and VCC antibody testing and 1:50 for LPS, with 0.1% bovine serum albumin in PBS-Tween (10 mM PBS [pH 7.2] containing 0.05% Tween 20). Then, 100 μl of diluted serum/well was added for each antigen. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies to human IgG or IgA were applied in separate wells. Plates were washed and developed with ortho-phenylene diamine substrate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 0.012% hydrogen peroxide in 0.1 M sodium citrate buffer. The optical density was measured kinetically at 450 nm for 5 min. The maximal rate of optical density change was expressed as milli-optical density absorbance units per minute. ELISA units were normalized by calculating the ratio of the test sample to a standard of pooled convalescent-phase serum from recovered cholera patients added to each plate (33).

For the collection of lymphocyte supernatants, heparinized blood was diluted in PBS (1:1). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and serum were isolated by differential centrifugation with Ficoll-Isopaque (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ). PBMC were resuspended at a concentration of 107 cells/ml in RPMI medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA) and supplemented with 1% penicillin, 1% streptomycin, 1% l-glutamine, 1% sodium-pyruvate, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT). PBMC were incubated for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 in 24-well tissue culture plates without mitogen. Plates were centrifuged at 1,200 × g for 10 min, and the supernatants were collected. A protease inhibitor cocktail containing aprotinin (0.15 μM), leupeptin (10 μM), sodium azide (15 μM), and 4-(amino-ethyl) benzene sulfonyl fluoride (0.2 μM) was added at a concentration of 10 μl/ml of supernatant, and sample aliquots were preserved at −70°C. Supernatants were assayed at a 1:2 dilution in 0.1% bovine serum albumin in PBS-Tween in an ELISA as described above, and responses were detected with rabbit anti-human IgA- and IgG-horseradish peroxidase conjugate. Responses were measured kinetically as previously described (33).

FASCIA.The FASCIA (flow cytometric assay of specific cell-mediated immune response in activated whole blood) method was used as previously described to determine lymphoblast formation in response to antigenic stimulation (14, 48). Briefly, whole blood was collected in a lithium heparin-coated tube and diluted 1:8 in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 1% gentamicin, 1% mercaptoethanol, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum. Then, 100 μl of stimulating antigen, control antigen, or additional medium was added to 400 μl of diluted blood. After 6 days of in vitro culture at 37°C in 5% CO2, supernatant was preserved for cytokine analysis, and cells were stained with anti-CD3-FITC, anti-CD4-PerCP, anti-CD8-APC, and anti-CD45R0-PE monoclonal antibodies (Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems [BD], Stockholm, Sweden). An erythrocyte lysing solution of 1.0 μl of ammonium chloride (Orthumune lysing reagents; Ortho Diagnostics, Stockholm, Sweden) was added for 6 min, followed by incubation at room temperature, followed in turn by centrifugation, the removal of supernatants, and washing. Cells were suspended in 2% paraformaldehyde and stored in the dark; within 12 h, acquisition was conducted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACSCalibur [BD]) for standardized 2-min intervals using CellQuest Pro software (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Analysis was performed with FlowJo software (TreeStar, Inc.). The results are presented as the ratio of lymphoblast count with antigenic stimulation to the count without stimulation (stimulation index). A value of “1” indicates that stimulation is equal in samples with or without V. cholerae antigenic stimulation.

Additional investigation of memory T-cell phenotype.To further define the character of lymphoblasts proliferating in response to V. cholerae-specific antigens, we examined the peripheral blood of five cholera patients for additional T-cell phenotypic markers. On day 2 and day 7 after infection, we used the FASCIA method as described above and identified cell surface markers with anti-CD4-PerCP, anti-CD45R0-PE, anti-CD45RA-FITC, and anti-CCR7-APC monoclonal antibodies (BD).

Statistical analyses.The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare immunologic responses of cholera patients on different study days, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare immune responses between patients and healthy controls. All reported P values are two tailed. A cutoff of P ≤ 0.05 was the predetermined threshold for statistical significance. Analyses and figure preparation were performed on GraphPad Prism 4.0 and Stata version 9.0 (Stata Corp., Inc., College Station, TX). Geometric means with 95% confidence intervals are shown in figures unless otherwise stated.

RESULTS

Study population.Sixteen patients were enrolled in the study, and fifteen completed 30 days of follow-up. All participants had cholera and severe dehydration upon initial clinical evaluation. Ten apparently healthy adults were included as healthy controls. Demographic and clinical features comparing cholera patients and healthy controls are shown in Table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of cholera patients and healthy controls

Vibriocidal and antigen-specific antibody responses.VCC, LPS, and TcpA-specific antibody responses and vibriocidal titers were measured in sera on days 2, 7, and 30 and are shown in Table 3. On day 2 of infection, the geometric mean vibriocidal titer was 35 (95% confidence interval, 13 to 97), and this increased to 4,300 (3,000 to 6,300) by day 7 after infection (P < 0.001). All 16 patients demonstrated seroconversion.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3.

Serum vibriocidal and antibody responses in patients and healthy controls

We observed significant humoral responses to V. cholerae-specific antigens. VCC-specific IgG antibody titers peaked on day 30 and were significantly higher than titers on day 2 (P = 0.027). TcpA- and V. cholerae O1 LPS-specific IgG levels were highest on day 7 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001 compared to day 2). Patients demonstrated peak IgA responses on day 7 for all antigens, and these levels were significantly higher than day 2 measurements (P = 0.001 for TcpA- and LPS-specific antibodies, P < 0.001 for VCC-specific antibodies). LPS-, VCC-, and TcpA-specific antibody responses and vibriocidal titers were significantly greater on day 7 compared to responses observed in healthy controls.

Memory T-cell responses.Using the FASCIA method to measure lymphoblast proliferation, we observed significant increases in V. cholerae-specific memory T cells on day 7 after infection; these results are shown in Fig. 1. T-cell memory responses after stimulation by VCC and MP peaked on day 7 and decreased by day 30 (P = 0.013 and P = 0.001 for day 7 compared to day 2). Proliferation in response to TcpA increased by day 7 (P = 0.013) and remained elevated until day 30. Compared to healthy controls, the proliferation of memory T cells in response to VCC was significantly elevated on day 7 and day 30 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Differences in proliferation between HC and patient lymphoblasts were significant on both day 7 (P < 0.001) and day 30 (P = 0.035). Stimulation with V. cholerae O1 LPS, a T-cell independent antigen, did not generate any significant differences in memory T-cell proliferation during the 30-day period after infection.

FIG. 1.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 1.

Memory T-cell responses to V. cholerae antigens. Memory T cells are defined as CD4+/CD45R0+ cells. *, P ≤ 0.05 for day 2 compared to day 7 or day 30; ∧, P ≤ 0.05 for healthy controls (HC) compared to day 7 or day 30.

Immune responses to VCC.The antigen VCC generated a more robust T-cell memory lymphoblast response than that observed to other V. cholerae antigens assayed (Fig. 1). In addition, high-magnitude humoral responses to VCC were measured (Table 3). We also used the antibody in lymphocyte supernatant assay to assess mucosal immune responses to VCC (9). On day 7 after infection, lymphocytes stimulated in the gut mucosa transiently circulate in the peripheral blood (40). At this time, we observed a significant increase in VCC-specific antibodies secreted from circulating lymphocytes compared to day 2. These results are shown in Fig. 2.

FIG. 2.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 2.

VCC-specific antibody responses in supernatants of lymphocytes circulating on days 2 and 7 after infection.

Memory T-cell function and phenotype.We used known markers of T-cell function to further determine the nature of the memory T-cell populations after V. cholerae infection. The CD45RA marker was used to exclude intermediate memory populations (CD45R0+ CD45RA+ cells) from the analysis (17). The memory T-cell CD4+ CD45R0+ CD45RA− population was on average 80% CCR7− after 6 days ex vivo stimulation, and a representative flow cytometry plot is shown in Fig. 3. Lymphoblast populations displaying these markers indicate an effector memory population. The remaining CD4+ CD45R0+ CD45RA− cells were CCR7+, markers consistent with a central memory T-cell phenotype.

FIG. 3.
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIG. 3.

Proportion of central memory cells in the proliferating memory T-cell population. On average, 20% of CD4+ CD45R0+ CD45RA− memory T cells had the CCR7+ marker, a finding consistent with the central memory phenotype. Plots above are representative of the five patients sampled. (A) Lymphoblast and lymphocyte population after 6-day ex vivo stimulation with V. cholerae MP. (B) Lymphoblast gated CD4+ population. (C) CD4+ gated CD45R0+ CD45RA− population. (D) CD4+ CD45R0+ CD45RA− gated CCR7+ population. CCR7+ gates were placed by comparing a CCR7 unstained control to a CCR7 stained plot.

DISCUSSION

After natural V. cholerae O1 infection, an adaptive immune response provides protection from subsequent disease, but the mechanism of this protection is incompletely understood. In North American volunteers, infection with V. cholerae provided over 90% specific protection from rechallenge with the same biotype, and this protection lasted for at least 3 years (24). An observational study showed that dehydrating V. cholerae El Tor infection in areas of endemicity conferred significant protection from subsequent disease for approximately 5 years (15).

Compared to natural infection, protective immunity generated by vaccine candidates has been incomplete and often short-lived. In addition, protection mediated by vaccination has declined more rapidly in persons living in areas of endemicity than in V. cholerae-naive persons. An oral, inactivated V. cholerae vaccine containing CTB (rCTB-WC) resulted in 60% protective efficacy in North American volunteers (7). When tested in Bangladesh, this effect waned by 1 year and provided little protection in children (11). Similarly, a live attenuated vaccine strain (CVD-103HgR) gave minimal protection in Indonesian field trials after encouraging results were observed in North American volunteers (43, 49). The reasons for the differences in immune responses between vaccinees and cholera patients and for the discrepancies in the degree of protection between vaccinees in areas where the cholera is endemic versus areas where it is not endemic are not known.

The vibriocidal antibody response is the best characterized of the immune responses to V. cholerae infection. Although the magnitude of vibriocidal titer roughly correlates with protection from disease, this relationship is inconsistent. Since V. cholerae is noninvasive, it is unclear how a serum protein such as the vibriocidal antibody may provide protection. Instead, vibriocidal titers may serve as a proxy measurement for protective immunity. In a study of household contacts of cholera patients, a logistic regression model demonstrated that levels of vibriocidal antibody and CTB-specific IgA were associated with a protective effect independent of other immunologic factors (19). However, the duration and extent of protection mediated by these factors declines more rapidly than the protection observed after natural infection, suggesting that other longer-lasting immunologic responses are necessary for protection.

In order to identify additional factors that may play a role in protective immunity, we studied responses to VCC, an antigen for which immune responses have not previously been studied in humans. We observed that VCC is strongly immunogenic and generates both B- and T-cell responses of a higher magnitude than those observed to other V. cholerae antigens. Further studies are needed to characterize the role of VCC in both infection and protective immunity.

In addition to antigen-specific antibody responses, patients with cholera develop memory B cells specific for V. cholerae antigens CTB, TcpA, and LPS (18, 22). Responses to protein antigens CTB and TcpA persisted for more than 1 year, whereas memory B-cell responses to LPS, a carbohydrate antigen, waned more quickly after infection (18). Memory B-cell responses to LPS do not require T-cell recognition, and this may explain the more rapidly declining memory B-cell response to LPS compared to responses generated by CTB and TcpA. Development of humoral responses to protein antigens are dependent on T-cell responses (25). CD4+ cell cytokine secretion and costimulation are the primary determinants of the quality and duration of memory B-cell responses to protein antigens (25). The direct binding of T and B cells in secondary lymphoid tissue facilitates CD40 and CD40L interactions critical for B-cell proliferation and isotype switching (13, 26). The stability of memory B-cell responses after exposure to TcpA and CTB, in contrast to T-cell-independent antigens such as LPS, is likely the result of T-cell contributions to memory B-cell activation.

Our results suggest that T-cell responses to V. cholerae infection may play a role in protective immunity, and several recent studies support this hypothesis. Cytokine responses, including an increase in IL-13 secretion by proliferating T cells, have been observed in acute cholera, suggesting a Th2 polarized T-cell response (6). Differences in cytokine levels in the serum and fecal extracts of parasite coinfected cholera patients compared to parasite-uninfected patients suggest that T-cell responses contribute to differences observed between vaccinee responses in areas where cholera is endemic, where parasitic infection is common, versus areas where it is not endemic (20).

Previously observed T-cell responses following V. cholerae infection were hypothesized to represent memory T-cell responses because people living in areas of endemicity develop immune responses to V. cholerae as children (6, 16, 29, 30). Memory T cells are a heterogeneous population and, unlike B cells, changes in T cells induced by exposure to antigen may be reversible (4, 27). Therefore, there is a lack of consensus on the classification of the populations that result from memory T-cell proliferation upon exposure to antigen. Generally, subsets are divided into effector memory cells that secrete cytokines and home to peripheral sites, and central memory cells that secrete fewer cytokines and home to lymph nodes (1, 47). We differentiated these populations using the CCR7 marker, a chemokine receptor active in T-cell migration (8). The absence of CCR7 on memory T cells is associated with the ability to secrete cytokines (1, 23). In our study, CD4+ CD45R0+ CD45RA− CCR7− cells, classified as effector memory cells, were the most abundant T-cell type after 6 days of in vitro stimulation. CD4+ CD45R0+ CD45RA− CCR7+ cells were classified as central memory cells, and this subtype is known to respond to antigen upon subsequent exposure (5, 47). It is uncertain whether the prolonged in vitro stimulation affects the relative abundance of T-cell memory subtypes we observed.

We hypothesize that protective immunity to V. cholerae infection is mediated by an anamnestic memory B-cell response mounted in the intestinal mucosa and that memory T cells are necessary for developing and maintaining this response. Our results show significant memory T-cell responses to a variety of V. cholerae antigens by day 7 after infection, at a time prior to and concurrent with the development of B-cell responses. The majority of the memory T cells observed were of the effector memory phenotype, while a substantial minority were central memory T cells. These results suggest that T-cell responses to V. cholerae antigens may be important for generation and stability of memory B-cell responses.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the ICDDR,B Centre for Health and Population Research and by the following grants: U01 AI058935 (S.B.C.), RO3 AI063079 (F.Q.), U01 AI077883 (E.T.R.), International Research Scientist Development Award KO1 TW07144 (R.C.L.), Howard Hughes Medical Institute Physician Scientist Early Career Award (R.C.L.), International Research Scientist Development Award KO1 TW07409 (J.B.H.), and a Fogarty International Center Global Infectious Disease Research Training Program Award in Vaccine Development D43 TW05572 (M.A., A.A.T., and A.S.). A.A.W., A.M.H., E.A.K., F.C., and A.I.K. are recipients of a Fogarty International Clinical Research Scholars award from the Fogarty International Center at the National Institutes of Health (D43 TW005572 and R24 TW007988). F.M. is a recipient of a Harvard Initiative for Global Health SURF Award. F.Q. and T.R.B. are recipients of funds from the Swedish Agency for International Development and Corp. (SIDA/SAREC).

We are grateful for the participation of patients and the work of the field staff at the ICDDR,B. We also thank Mohammad Rasheduzzaman at the ICDDR,B and Richelle Charles at Massachusetts General Hospital for laboratory and technical assistance.

FOOTNOTES

    • Received 15 July 2009.
    • Returned for modification 5 August 2009.
    • Accepted 13 August 2009.
  • Copyright © 2009 American Society for Microbiology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Amyes, E., A. J. McMichael, and M. F. Callan. 2005. Human CD4+ T cells are predominantly distributed among six phenotypically and functionally distinct subsets. J. Immunol.175:5765-5773.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Arcidiacono, D., S. Odom, B. Frossi, J. Rivera, S. R. Paccani, C. T. Baldari, C. Pucillo, C. Montecucco, and M. de Bernard. 2008. The Vibrio cholerae cytolysin promotes activation of mast cell (T helper 2) cytokine production. Cell Microbiol.10:899-907.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Asaduzzaman, M., E. T. Ryan, M. John, L. Hang, A. I. Khan, A. S. Faruque, R. K. Taylor, S. B. Calderwood, and F. Qadri. 2004. The major subunit of the toxin-coregulated pilus TcpA induces mucosal and systemic immunoglobulin A immune responses in patients with cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139. Infect. Immun.72:4448-4454.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    Bell, E. B., and S. M. Sparshott. 1990. Interconversion of CD45R subsets of CD4 T cells in vivo. Nature348:163-166.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    Bell, E. B., and J. Westermann. 2008. CD4 memory T cells on trial: immunological memory without a memory T cell. Trends Immunol.29:405-411.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  6. 6.↵
    Bhuiyan, T. R., S. B. Lundin, A. I. Khan, A. Lundgren, J. B. Harris, S. B. Calderwood, and F. Qadri. 2009. Cholera caused by Vibrio cholerae O1 induces T-cell responses in the circulation. Infect. Immun.77:1888-1893.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Black, R. E., M. M. Levine, M. L. Clements, C. R. Young, A. M. Svennerholm, and J. Holmgren. 1987. Protective efficacy in humans of killed whole-vibrio oral cholera vaccine with and without the B subunit of cholera toxin. Infect. Immun.55:1116-1120.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Bromley, S. K., S. Y. Thomas, and A. D. Luster. 2005. Chemokine receptor CCR7 guides T-cell exit from peripheral tissues and entry into afferent lymphatics. Nat. Immunol.6:895-901.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  9. 9.↵
    Chang, H. S., and D. A. Sack. 2001. Development of a novel in vitro assay (ALS assay) for evaluation of vaccine-induced antibody secretion from circulating mucosal lymphocytes. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.8:482-488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Chattopadhyay, K., D. Bhattacharyya, and K. K. Banerjee. 2002. Vibrio cholerae hemolysin. Implication of amphiphilicity and lipid-induced conformational change for its pore-forming activity. Eur. J. Biochem.269:4351-4358.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. 11.↵
    Clemens, J. D., J. R. Harris, D. A. Sack, J. Chakraborty, F. Ahmed, B. F. Stanton, N. Huda, M. R. Khan, M. U. Khan, B. A. Kay, et al. 1988. Field trial of oral cholera vaccines in Bangladesh. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health19:417-422.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Debellis, L., A. Diana, D. Arcidiacono, R. Fiorotto, P. Portincasa, D. F. Altomare, C. Spirli, and M. de Bernard. 2009. The Vibrio cholerae cytolysin promotes chloride secretion from intact human intestinal mucosa. PLoS ONE4:e5074.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Durie, F. H., T. M. Foy, S. R. Masters, J. D. Laman, and R. J. Noelle. 1994. The role of CD40 in the regulation of humoral and cell-mediated immunity. Immunol. Today15:406-411.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  14. 14.↵
    Gaines, H., L. Andersson, and G. Biberfeld. 1996. A new method for measuring lymphoproliferation at the single-cell level in whole blood cultures by flow cytometry. J. Immunol. Methods195:63-72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    Glass, R. I., S. Becker, M. I. Huq, B. J. Stoll, M. U. Khan, M. H. Merson, J. V. Lee, and R. E. Black. 1982. Endemic cholera in rural Bangladesh, 1966-1980. Am. J. Epidemiol.116:959-970.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  16. 16.↵
    Glass, R. I., A. M. Svennerholm, M. R. Khan, S. Huda, M. I. Huq, and J. Holmgren. 1985. Seroepidemiological studies of El Tor cholera in Bangladesh: association of serum antibody levels with protection. J. Infect. Dis.151:236-242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  17. 17.↵
    Hamann, D., P. A. Baars, B. Hooibrink, and R. W. van Lier. 1996. Heterogeneity of the human CD4+ T-cell population: two distinct CD4+ T-cell subsets characterized by coexpression of CD45RA and CD45RO isoforms. Blood88:3513-3521.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Harris, A. M., M. S. Bhuiyan, F. Chowdhury, A. I. Khan, A. Hossain, E. A. Kendall, A. Rahman, R. C. LaRocque, J. Wrammert, E. T. Ryan, F. Qadri, S. B. Calderwood, and J. B. Harris. 2009. Antigen-specific memory B-cell responses to Vibrio cholerae O1 infection in Bangladesh. Infect. Immun.77:3850-3856.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Harris, J. B., R. C. Larocque, F. Chowdhury, A. I. Khan, T. Logvinenko, A. S. Faruque, E. T. Ryan, F. Qadri, and S. B. Calderwood. 2008. Susceptibility to Vibrio cholerae infection in a cohort of household contacts of patients with cholera in Bangladesh. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.2:e221.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    Harris, J. B., M. J. Podolsky, T. R. Bhuiyan, F. Chowdhury, A. I. Khan, R. C. Larocque, T. Logvinenko, J. Kendall, A. S. Faruque, C. R. Nagler, E. T. Ryan, F. Qadri, and S. B. Calderwood. 2009. Immunologic responses to Vibrio cholerae in patients co-infected with intestinal parasites in Bangladesh. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis.3:e403.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Iwanaga, M., and K. Yamamoto. 1985. New medium for the production of cholera toxin by Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor. J. Clin. Microbiol.22:405-408.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Jayasekera, C. R., J. B. Harris, S. Bhuiyan, F. Chowdhury, A. I. Khan, A. S. Faruque, R. C. Larocque, E. T. Ryan, R. Ahmed, F. Qadri, and S. B. Calderwood. 2008. Cholera toxin-specific memory B-cell responses are induced in patients with dehydrating diarrhea caused by Vibrio cholerae O1. J. Infect. Dis.198:1055-1061.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Johnson, L. A., and D. G. Jackson. 2008. Cell traffic and the lymphatic endothelium. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1131:119-133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Levine, M. M., R. E. Black, M. L. Clements, L. Cisneros, D. R. Nalin, and C. R. Young. 1981. Duration of infection-derived immunity to cholera. J. Infect. Dis.143:818-820.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. 25.↵
    McHeyzer-Williams, L. J., L. P. Malherbe, and M. G. McHeyzer-Williams. 2006. Checkpoints in memory B-cell evolution. Immunol. Rev.211:255-268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    McHeyzer-Williams, L. J., and M. G. McHeyzer-Williams. 2005. Antigen-specific memory B-cell development. Annu. Rev. Immunol.23:487-513.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. 27.↵
    Michie, C. A., A. McLean, C. Alcock, and P. C. Beverley. 1992. Lifespan of human lymphocyte subsets defined by CD45 isoforms. Nature360:264-265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  28. 28.↵
    Monsur, K. A. 1961. A highly selective gelatin-taurocholate-tellurite medium for the isolation of Vibrio cholerae. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.55:440-442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Mosley, W. H., A. S. Benenson, and R. Barui. 1968. A serological survey for cholera antibodies in rural east Pakistan. 1. The distribution of antibody in the control population of a cholera-vaccine field-trial area and the relation of antibody titre to the pattern of endemic cholera. Bull. W. H. O.38:327-334.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  30. 30.↵
    Mosley, W. H., A. S. Benenson, and R. Barui. 1968. A serological survey for cholera antibodies in rural east Pakistan. 2. A comparison of antibody titres in the immunized and control population of a cholera-vaccine field-trial area and the relation of antibody titre to cholera case rate. Bull. W. H. O.38:335-346.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  31. 31.↵
    Mukherjee, G., K. K. Banerjee, and T. Biswas. 2008. Oligomerization of Vibrio cholerae hemolysin induces CXCR3 upregulation and activation of B-1a cell. Cell Mol. Immunol.5:231-234.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Mukherjee, G., A. Biswas, K. K. Banerjee, and T. Biswas. 2008. Vibrio cholerae hemolysin is apoptogenic to peritoneal B-1a cells but its oligomer shepherd the cells for IgA response. Cell Mol. Immunol.45:266-270.
    OpenUrl
  33. 33.↵
    Qadri, F., F. Ahmed, M. M. Karim, C. Wenneras, Y. A. Begum, M. Abdus Salam, M. J. Albert, and J. R. McGhee. 1999. Lipopolysaccharide- and cholera toxin-specific subclass distribution of B-cell responses in cholera. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.6:812-818.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Qadri, F., T. Azim, A. Chowdhury, J. Hossain, R. B. Sack, and M. J. Albert. 1994. Production, characterization, and application of monoclonal antibodies to Vibrio cholerae O139 synonym Bengal. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.1:51-54.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. 35.↵
    Qadri, F., T. R. Bhuiyan, K. K. Dutta, R. Raqib, M. S. Alam, N. H. Alam, A. M. Svennerholm, and M. M. Mathan. 2004. Acute dehydrating disease caused by Vibrio cholerae serogroups O1 and O139 induce increases in innate cells and inflammatory mediators at the mucosal surface of the gut. Gut53:62-69.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.↵
    Qadri, F., A. Chowdhury, J. Hossain, K. Chowdhury, T. Azim, T. Shimada, K. M. Islam, R. B. Sack, and M. J. Albert. 1994. Development and evaluation of rapid monoclonal antibody-based coagglutination test for direct detection of Vibrio cholerae O139 synonym Bengal in stool samples. J. Clin. Microbiol.32:1589-1590.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. 37.↵
    Qadri, F., G. Jonson, Y. A. Begum, C. Wenneras, M. J. Albert, M. A. Salam, and A. M. Svennerholm. 1997. Immune response to the mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin in patients with cholera due to Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.4:429-434.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Qadri, F., G. Mohi, J. Hossain, T. Azim, A. M. Khan, M. A. Salam, R. B. Sack, M. J. Albert, and A. M. Svennerholm. 1995. Comparison of the vibriocidal antibody response in cholera due to Vibrio cholerae O139 Bengal with the response in cholera due to Vibrio cholerae O1. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.2:685-688.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    Qadri, F., R. Raqib, F. Ahmed, T. Rahman, C. Wenneras, S. K. Das, N. H. Alam, M. M. Mathan, and A. M. Svennerholm. 2002. Increased levels of inflammatory mediators in children and adults infected with Vibrio cholerae O1 and O139. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.9:221-229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    Qadri, F., E. T. Ryan, A. S. Faruque, F. Ahmed, A. I. Khan, M. M. Islam, S. M. Akramuzzaman, D. A. Sack, and S. B. Calderwood. 2003. Antigen-specific immunoglobulin A antibodies secreted from circulating B cells are an effective marker for recent local immune responses in patients with cholera: comparison to antibody-secreting cell responses and other immunological markers. Infect. Immun.71:4808-4814.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. 41.↵
    Rahman, M., D. A. Sack, S. Mahmood, and A. Hossain. 1987. Rapid diagnosis of cholera by coagglutination test using 4-h fecal enrichment cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol.25:2204-2206.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    Rahman, M. H., K. Biswas, M. A. Hossain, R. B. Sack, J. J. Mekalanos, and S. M. Faruque. 2008. Distribution of genes for virulence and ecological fitness among diverse Vibrio cholerae population in a cholera-endemic area: tracking the evolution of pathogenic strains. DNA Cell Biol.27:347-355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    Richie, E. E., N. H. Punjabi, Y. Y. Sidharta, K. K. Peetosutan, M. M. Sukandar, S. S. Wasserman, M. M. Lesmana, F. F. Wangsasaputra, S. S. Pandam, M. M. Levine, P. P. O'Hanley, S. J. Cryz, and C. H. Simanjuntak. 2000. Efficacy trial of single-dose live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in North Jakarta, Indonesia, a cholera-endemic area. Vaccine18:2399-2410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  44. 44.↵
    Sack, D. A., R. B. Sack, G. B. Nair, and A. K. Siddique. 2004. Cholera. Lancet363:223-233.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. 45.↵
    Saha, D., R. C. LaRocque, A. I. Khan, J. B. Harris, Y. A. Begum, S. M. Akramuzzaman, A. S. Faruque, E. T. Ryan, F. Qadri, and S. B. Calderwood. 2004. Incomplete correlation of serum vibriocidal antibody titer with protection from Vibrio cholerae infection in urban Bangladesh. J. Infect. Dis.189:2318-2322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  46. 46.↵
    Saka, H. A., C. Bidinost, C. Sola, P. Carranza, C. Collino, S. Ortiz, J. R. Echenique, and J. L. Bocco. 2008. Vibrio cholerae cytolysin is essential for high enterotoxicity and apoptosis induction produced by a cholera toxin gene-negative V. cholerae non-O1, non-O139 strain. Microb. Pathog.44:118-128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. 47.↵
    Sallusto, F., D. Lenig, R. Forster, M. Lipp, and A. Lanzavecchia. 1999. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature401:708-712.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  48. 48.↵
    Svahn, A., A. Linde, R. Thorstensson, K. Karlen, L. Andersson, and H. Gaines. 2003. Development and evaluation of a flow-cytometric assay of specific cell-mediated immune response in activated whole blood for the detection of cell-mediated immunity against varicella-zoster virus. J. Immunol. Methods277:17-25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  49. 49.↵
    Tacket, C. O., M. B. Cohen, S. S. Wasserman, G. Losonsky, S. Livio, K. Kotloff, R. Edelman, J. B. Kaper, S. J. Cryz, R. A. Giannella, G. Schiff, and M. M. Levine. 1999. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentered trial of the efficacy of a single dose of live oral cholera vaccine CVD 103-HgR in preventing cholera following challenge with Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor Inaba three months after vaccination. Infect. Immun.67:6341-6345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    Yamamoto, K., Y. Ichinose, N. Nakasone, M. Tanabe, M. Nagahama, J. Sakurai, and M. Iwanaga. 1986. Identity of hemolysins produced by Vibrio cholerae non-O1 and V. cholerae O1, biotype El Tor. Infect. Immun.51:927-931.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Memory T-Cell Responses to Vibrio cholerae O1 Infection
Ana A. Weil, Mohammad Arifuzzaman, Taufiqur R. Bhuiyan, Regina C. LaRocque, Aaron M. Harris, Emily A. Kendall, Azim Hossain, Abdullah A. Tarique, Alaullah Sheikh, Fahima Chowdhury, Ashraful I. Khan, Farhan Murshed, Kenneth C. Parker, Kalyan K. Banerjee, Edward T. Ryan, Jason B. Harris, Firdausi Qadri, Stephen B. Calderwood
Infection and Immunity Oct 2009, 77 (11) 5090-5096; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00793-09

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Memory T-Cell Responses to Vibrio cholerae O1 Infection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Memory T-Cell Responses to Vibrio cholerae O1 Infection
Ana A. Weil, Mohammad Arifuzzaman, Taufiqur R. Bhuiyan, Regina C. LaRocque, Aaron M. Harris, Emily A. Kendall, Azim Hossain, Abdullah A. Tarique, Alaullah Sheikh, Fahima Chowdhury, Ashraful I. Khan, Farhan Murshed, Kenneth C. Parker, Kalyan K. Banerjee, Edward T. Ryan, Jason B. Harris, Firdausi Qadri, Stephen B. Calderwood
Infection and Immunity Oct 2009, 77 (11) 5090-5096; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00793-09
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

cholera
Immunity, Cellular
Immunologic Memory
T-Lymphocyte Subsets

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522