Skip to main content
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems
  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
  • ASM
    • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
    • Applied and Environmental Microbiology
    • Clinical Microbiology Reviews
    • Clinical and Vaccine Immunology
    • EcoSal Plus
    • Eukaryotic Cell
    • Infection and Immunity
    • Journal of Bacteriology
    • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
    • Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
    • Journal of Virology
    • mBio
    • Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews
    • Microbiology Resource Announcements
    • Microbiology Spectrum
    • Molecular and Cellular Biology
    • mSphere
    • mSystems

User menu

  • Log in
  • My alerts
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Infection and Immunity
publisher-logosite-logo

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Archive
    • Minireviews
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Scope
    • Editorial Policy
    • Submission, Review, & Publication Processes
    • Organization and Format
    • Errata, Author Corrections, Retractions
    • Illustrations and Tables
    • Nomenclature
    • Abbreviations and Conventions
    • Publication Fees
    • Ethics Resources and Policies
  • About the Journal
    • About IAI
    • Editor in Chief
    • Editorial Board
    • For Reviewers
    • For the Media
    • For Librarians
    • For Advertisers
    • Alerts
    • RSS
    • FAQ
  • Subscribe
    • Members
    • Institutions
Host Response and Inflammation

Distinct Roles of CD28- and CD40 Ligand-Mediated Costimulation in the Development of Protective Immunity and Pathology during Chlamydia muridarum Urogenital Infection in Mice

Lili Chen, Wen Cheng, Pooja Shivshankar, Lei Lei, Xiaoyun Zhang, Yimou Wu, I-Tien Yeh, Guangming Zhong
Lili Chen
1Departments of Microbiology and Immunology
3Department of Pathogen Biology, University of South China, 28 Changshen Rd., Hengyang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wen Cheng
1Departments of Microbiology and Immunology
4Department of Immunology, Xiangya Medical School, The Central South University, 168 Tongzipo Rd., Changsha, Hunan, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pooja Shivshankar
1Departments of Microbiology and Immunology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lei Lei
1Departments of Microbiology and Immunology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xiaoyun Zhang
1Departments of Microbiology and Immunology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yimou Wu
3Department of Pathogen Biology, University of South China, 28 Changshen Rd., Hengyang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
I-Tien Yeh
2Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78229
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Guangming Zhong
1Departments of Microbiology and Immunology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: zhongg@uthscsa.edu
DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00611-08
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIG. 1.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 1.

    Effect of CD28, CD80/CD86, CD40, or CD40L deficiency on live organism shedding following chlamydial infection. Wild-type mice (black bar) or mice deficient in CD28 (CD28 KO, gray bar), CD80/CD86 (open bar), CD40 (CD40 KO, heavily hatched bar), or CD40L (CD40L KO, lightly hatched bar) were infected intravaginally with C. muridarum organisms, and vaginal swabs were obtained along the infection course as indicated along the x axis for measuring the number of live organisms (in IFU). The IFU count from each swab was converted into log10, and the log10 IFU values were used to calculate the means and standard deviations for each mouse group at each time point as presented along the y axis. The CD28 KO group started with a total of 20 mice and the CD80/CD86 KO group started with 10 mice while the wild-type, CD40 KO, and CD40L KO groups each started with 18. The number of mice with detectable IFU (IFU+) at each time point is listed in the bottom table. On day 73 after the primary infection, five to nine mice from each group were reinfected with C. muridarum organisms. The log10 IFU values along the time course were first analyzed by ANOVA and reanalyzed between the wild-type and KO groups (that displayed significant differences under ANOVA) by using a two-tailed Student t test (**, P < 0.01; *, P < 0.05). The wild-type and CD28 KO mice resolved their infections within 30 days after primary infection and within 7 days after secondary infection. However, mice deficient in CD40 or CD40L maintained statistically significant higher levels of live organism shedding and displayed extended infection courses (to 50 days after primary infection and 20 days after secondary infection).

  • FIG. 2.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 2.

    Effect of CD28, CD80/CD86, CD40, or CD40L deficiency on the development of inflammatory pathologies in the mouse urogenital tract after chlamydial infection. (A) When urogenital tract tissues from wild-type (a, f, and k), CD28 KO (b, g, and l), CD80/CD86 KO (c, h, and m), CD40 KO (d, i, and n), and CD40L KO (e, j, and o) mice were examined for gross appearance (a to e), on slides (f to j), and under a microscope (k to o), obvious inflammatory pathologies were noted in the representative images from wild-type, CD40 KO, and CD40L KO mice but not CD28 or CD80/CD86 KO mice. The pathologies were recorded as hydrosalpinx and uterine horn (UT) dilatation observable with the naked eye (a, d, and e, white arrows, see Table 1 for quantitative data), as well as extensive infiltration of mononuclear cells and oviduct (OV) luminal dilation observed under microscope after H&E staining (k, n, and o, white arrows). The representative images were from mice sacrificed on day 80 after primary infection. (B) Inflammation and lumen dilatation of both uterine horns and oviducts were semiquantitatively scored under a microscope, and the scores were used to calculate the means and standard errors for each group as shown along the y axis. The various tissue and mouse groups were indicated along the x axis. The solid bar represents tissue samples from wild-type mice, the gray bar represents tissue samples from C28 KO mice, the open bar represents tissue samples from CD80/CD86 KO mice, the heavily hatched bar represents tissue samples from CD40 KO mice, and the lightly hatched bar represents tissue samples from CD40L KO mice. The number of mice in each group is listed Table 1. Statistically significant differences in inflammation scores (*, P < 0.05) of uterine horn tissues and dilatation scores of both uterine horn and oviduct tissues were found between wild-type and CD28 or CD80/CD86 KO mice after primary but not after secondary infection.

  • FIG. 3.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 3.

    Effect of CD28, CD80/CD86, CD40, or CD40L deficiency on mouse serum IgG and IgM antibody production in response to chlamydial infection. The various mouse groups were infected with chlamydial organisms as described in the Fig. 1 legend, and the mice were bled on different days after primary infection, as indicated along the x axis. Serum samples displayed on the right side of the figure were from the reinfected mice only. The Chlamydia-specific IgG (a) and IgM (b) antibodies in the mouse sera were measured using C. muridarum-infected HeLa cells as antigens in an immunofluorescence assay. The highest dilution at which a given mouse serum still positively stained the C. muridarum inclusions was determined as the titer of that serum. The serum dilutions were converted into log10 titers for calculating the means and standard deviations, as displayed along the y axis. The wild-type mice (solid diamond, n = 10) developed a robust serum IgG response, while the CD28 (n = 12) or CD80/CD86 (n = 10) KO mice (solid or open square) developed a reduced level of IgG antibodies. However, no Chlamydia-specific IgG antibodies were detected in mice deficient in either CD40 (solid triangle, n = 10) or CD40L (open triangle, n = 10), although all mice developed Chlamydia-specific serum IgM antibodies.

  • FIG. 4.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 4.

    Effect of CD28, CD80/CD86, CD40, or CD40L deficiency on chlamydial antigen-specific T-cell responses. Splenocytes were harvested from wild-type (solid bar), CD28 KO (gray bar), CD80/CD86 KO (open bar), CD40 KO (heavily hatched bar), or CD40L KO (lightly hatched bar) mice and restimulated with chlamydial organism antigens for 72 h. The culture supernatants were measured for IFN-γ using ELISA, and the results were expressed as pg/ml as shown along the y axis. There were five mice for each group after primary infection and five for the CD80/CD86 KO mice and three for the remaining groups after secondary infection. Spleen cells from CD40 or CD40L KO mice failed to produce significantly high levels of IFN-γ (P < 0.01, Student t test).

  • FIG. 5.
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIG. 5.

    Effect of CD28, CD80/CD86, CD40, or CD40L deficiency on cytokine production in the mouse genital tract after chlamydial infection. On different days after intravaginal infection, vaginal swabs were collected from various groups of mice including wild-type (solid bar), CD28 KO (gray bar), CD40 KO (heavily hatched bar), or CD40L KO (lightly hatched bar) mice, as described in Fig. 1 legend and as displayed along the x axis. A portion of each vaginal swab sample was used to measure IL-1α (a), IL-6 (b), MIP-2 (a mouse homologue of IL-8 [c]), TNF-α (d), and IFN-γ (e) using ELISA, and the results were expressed as pg/ml along the y axis. The data came from 8 to 12 mice per group after primary infection and 3 to 6 mice per group after secondary infection. The varied number of mouse samples in each group was largely caused by the limited amount of each vaginal swab sample. No single sample had sufficient amount for measuring all five cytokines. The cytokine levels from CD80/CD86 KO mice were similar to those from CD28 KO mice and were not included into the figure. Please note that most cytokines peaked on day 7 after primary infection. The CD28 KO mice produced significantly lower levels of IL-1α, IL-6, MIP-2, and TNF-α (*, P < 0.05 [Student t test]), but not IFN-γ, whereas CD40 or CD40L KO mice failed to produce a significant level of IFN-γ (**, P < 0.01). Upon secondary infection, the cytokine peaks in most mice moved to day 3 and extended to day 6 or beyond.

Tables

  • Figures
  • TABLE 1.

    Incidence of gross pathologiesa

    Mouse groupNo. of miceb sacrificed after:
    Primary infectionSecondary infection
    Uterine horn dilationHydrosalpinxUterine horn dilationHydrosalpinx
    NoneSingleBothNoneSingleBothNoneSingleBothNoneSingleBoth
    Wild type00100010008008
    CD28 KO5*24056009009
    CD80/86 KO2**21023005005
    CD40L KO0010028008008
    CD40 KO0190010008008
    • ↵ a Mice were sacrificed after primary infection alone or after secondary infection, and the reproductive tissues were isolated and inspected for gross pathologies, including uterine horn dilatation and oviduct hydrosalpinx (see Fig. 2A for images).

    • ↵ b The number of mice showing the pathologies on single or both sides of the reproductive tissues were recorded and tabulated. The total uterine horn dilation incidence (both single and bilateral) of CD28 KO mice (*, P = 0.02) or CD80/86 KO mice (**, P = 0.09) was compared to that of wil-type mice using the Fisher exact test.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Download PDF
Citation Tools
Distinct Roles of CD28- and CD40 Ligand-Mediated Costimulation in the Development of Protective Immunity and Pathology during Chlamydia muridarum Urogenital Infection in Mice
Lili Chen, Wen Cheng, Pooja Shivshankar, Lei Lei, Xiaoyun Zhang, Yimou Wu, I-Tien Yeh, Guangming Zhong
Infection and Immunity Jun 2009, 77 (7) 3080-3089; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00611-08

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Print

Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email

Thank you for sharing this Infection and Immunity article.

NOTE: We request your email address only to inform the recipient that it was you who recommended this article, and that it is not junk mail. We do not retain these email addresses.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Distinct Roles of CD28- and CD40 Ligand-Mediated Costimulation in the Development of Protective Immunity and Pathology during Chlamydia muridarum Urogenital Infection in Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Infection and Immunity
(Your Name) thought you would be interested in this article in Infection and Immunity.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Distinct Roles of CD28- and CD40 Ligand-Mediated Costimulation in the Development of Protective Immunity and Pathology during Chlamydia muridarum Urogenital Infection in Mice
Lili Chen, Wen Cheng, Pooja Shivshankar, Lei Lei, Xiaoyun Zhang, Yimou Wu, I-Tien Yeh, Guangming Zhong
Infection and Immunity Jun 2009, 77 (7) 3080-3089; DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00611-08
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Top
  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
    • FOOTNOTES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

KEYWORDS

CD28 Antigens
CD40 Ligand
Chlamydia Infections
Chlamydia muridarum
Urinary Tract Infections

Related Articles

Cited By...

About

  • About IAI
  • Editor in Chief
  • Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • For Reviewers
  • For the Media
  • For Librarians
  • For Advertisers
  • Alerts
  • RSS
  • FAQ
  • Permissions
  • Journal Announcements

Authors

  • ASM Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Article Types
  • Ethics
  • Contact Us

Follow #IAIjournal

@ASMicrobiology

       

ASM Journals

ASM journals are the most prominent publications in the field, delivering up-to-date and authoritative coverage of both basic and clinical microbiology.

About ASM | Contact Us | Press Room

 

ASM is a member of

Scientific Society Publisher Alliance

 

American Society for Microbiology
1752 N St. NW
Washington, DC 20036
Phone: (202) 737-3600

Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology | Privacy Policy | Website feedback

Print ISSN: 0019-9567; Online ISSN: 1098-5522